Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Hail, Caesar!

4

marklaing1Feb 15, 2016

With young kids, 6 and 4, my wife and I struggle to go out to see big screen films these days so it's doubly tiresome when we hit a dud. The old couple sitting to the right of us must have been teenagers during the movie's time period andWith young kids, 6 and 4, my wife and I struggle to go out to see big screen films these days so it's doubly tiresome when we hit a dud. The old couple sitting to the right of us must have been teenagers during the movie's time period and the wife fell asleep. Twice, snoring loudly. I thought Clooney was in the wrong part. The younger player were great. The movie was a mess, compare it to the dark humor of The Player and you'll see why. Ghastly with some great moments. But a series of vignettes, set pieces to what purpose. Sleep.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

5

foxgroveMar 16, 2016

The most disappointing thing about ‘Hail Caesar!’ is that it had the potential to be a very funny pastiche of Hollywood’s golden age, and indeed the moments involving movie making recreations are sublime indeed. The problem is that the twoThe most disappointing thing about ‘Hail Caesar!’ is that it had the potential to be a very funny pastiche of Hollywood’s golden age, and indeed the moments involving movie making recreations are sublime indeed. The problem is that the two main threads of the story are just not worthy of the incidental pleasures that the rest of the movie affords. The characters of Eddie Mannix and Baird Whitlock, played by Josh Brolin and George Clooney as a troubled studio head and kidnapped star respectively, are just not given the material to make their characters anything but dull, despite their perfectly respectable efforts. The film is basically too loosely written to gel properly into a satisfactory whole and it is definitely not as funny as it should be. Inspired moments peppered throughout enable a game supporting cast to try and salvage a film that is resolutely skewered to following the boring story arcs of Brolin and Clooney. Scarlett Johansson, Tilda Swinton and Ralph Fiennes all register strongly, but it is Channing Tatum and Alden Ehrenreich who steal the show. Tatum is dazzlingly fabulous in his big song and dance number demonstrating a talent I don’t think anyone could have imagined. And as Hobie Doyle, the dumb star of countless westerns making his transition to drama, Ehrenrich presents us with the most enjoyable and fully rounded character in the film. More of him and less of Brolin and Clooney would have been advantageous and most welcome. The film’s biggest laugh out loud moment, though, is reserved for Frances McDormand’s editor, C C Calhoun, whose one scene unwittingly, but deliciously, brings to mind Isadora Duncan. The film is finely crafted in all areas but especially in costume and production design. Their contributions add to the scenes recreating the movie making process which are undoubtedly the highlights of an otherwise very uneven film.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

5

MantisAug 28, 2016

Another let down. I didn't get the fuss about Inside Llwyn Davis, and now this. The movie is at least for me more entertaining than the previous one of the brother directors, but still it failed to deliver for me. I could appreciate someAnother let down. I didn't get the fuss about Inside Llwyn Davis, and now this. The movie is at least for me more entertaining than the previous one of the brother directors, but still it failed to deliver for me. I could appreciate some jokes and clever remarks, but all in all it was not a very interesting story. One to watch if you're a Coen brothers fan and otherwise nothing lost by skipping this one.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

3

hydrallusOct 19, 2016

19 years. That's how long I've been a Cohen Bros fan. I like all their movies. Even A Serious Man and their more obscure works. But this film just isn't that funny or that entertaining. It's only slightly so.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

jblum1998May 13, 2016

Despite being a huge Coen Brother's fan I honestly didn't enjoy Hail, Caesar! as much as I thought I would...sure the acting was good, it's just such a slow-paced and extremely confusing movie. There may have been at least ONE humorous scene,Despite being a huge Coen Brother's fan I honestly didn't enjoy Hail, Caesar! as much as I thought I would...sure the acting was good, it's just such a slow-paced and extremely confusing movie. There may have been at least ONE humorous scene, but it didn't save the rest of the film.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

WallisdjJul 2, 2016

Would someone like to explain to me why I wasted an hour-and-a-half watching this film (other than to state that I saw the film)? No plot. No characterization. It appears that a great many actors were hired and not one of them delivered aWould someone like to explain to me why I wasted an hour-and-a-half watching this film (other than to state that I saw the film)? No plot. No characterization. It appears that a great many actors were hired and not one of them delivered a performance that will be remembered as anything but the worst ever!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

PeterAlexanderDec 11, 2016

Great cast, quirky and filled with amusing dialogue, the Coen brothers provide a film that is reasonably enjoyable to watch, but nothing more. It is not the masterpiece it tries to be.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

The3AcademySinsNov 18, 2019

I went into Hail, Caesar! expecting that the numerous reviews and word-of-mouth grumblings I have had about the movie would be true: "It's the worst Coen Brothers movie" or "its actually bad" or "its a waste of time." I was pleasantlyI went into Hail, Caesar! expecting that the numerous reviews and word-of-mouth grumblings I have had about the movie would be true: "It's the worst Coen Brothers movie" or "its actually bad" or "its a waste of time." I was pleasantly surprised when the movie turned out to be actually entertaining and meticulously crafted.

To its core, Hail, Caesar! is an anti-action movie. There is a lot of build up and tension that leads to ultimately no payoff. You're just along for the ride, and I ended up really enjoying the lack of a climax. There are a plethora of characters and interweaving plot threads, and the ensemble cast has no main character. The closest we come to a protagonist is Josh Brolin's character, who tries to navigate the quagmire that is the internal workings of a Golden Age Hollywood film studio and keep everything afloat. Every performance is really solid, and everyone gets their moment in the limelight.

Hail, Caesar is a strange, but authentic take on the movie business. Despite the occasional seediness and artistic conflicts, everyone loves the movies. In a way, Hail, Caesar is a very meta take on the film industry.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

DaisymichelleSep 24, 2016

It was months ago that I saw it - Georg Clooney's greasy jaundiced face and greasy hair and over-acted expressions, the whole movie, to Channing Tatum's fat oversized Botox face resembling a pig and the pointless stupid dance class?, theyIt was months ago that I saw it - Georg Clooney's greasy jaundiced face and greasy hair and over-acted expressions, the whole movie, to Channing Tatum's fat oversized Botox face resembling a pig and the pointless stupid dance class?, they all hated each other. I starting to feel even more sick. I have not experienced this kind of disgust before - It was new to me - and I had paid $2 and wasn't doing anything, I kept watching and it kept it up! The makeup was appalling, George Clooney might have looked better with matt based pancake for the grease on his face, he was not wearing any, Channing Tatum had enough on for both of them on his oversized Botox head (he was actually nice looking once), George Clooney's greasy face and greasy hair stuck to his face, the whole movie! made me sick, and when it was over I felt ill and whenever I see the advertising for it I feel ill, and see George Clooney's greasy face and hair and stupid expression. Gross .That's it.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

Rick1000Feb 6, 2016

From the hype and marketing I thought Hail, Caesar would be a very funny movie... I was wrong. This is an ambitious effort with a bunch of movie genres from the 1940s and '50s packed in, some with humorous results and others for the sake ofFrom the hype and marketing I thought Hail, Caesar would be a very funny movie... I was wrong. This is an ambitious effort with a bunch of movie genres from the 1940s and '50s packed in, some with humorous results and others for the sake of it. The problem with this film is that while there are several funny moments scattered throughout, the Coen Brothers introduce various plotlines, none of which generate any steam. Nothing has us asking; "what will happen?" How will this work out? The stories are so meekly resolved that nobody cares. Add to that the fact that no characters are explored fully enough to love them, hate them or really careabout then, and you've got a movie in which the audience simply doesn't have any reason to watch other than having paid to be there.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

5

kriebelrFeb 5, 2016

Some funny moments. Meandering, go nowhere plot. There were lots of big names in this film, which just seems like a gimmick. George Clooney's portrayal was very one dimensional. Slightly disappointed.

7 of 9 users found this helpful72

All this user's reviews

0

JJPingFeb 22, 2016

Joel and Ethan...please confess your intentions to purposely write a horrible script and then load up the cast with A-Listers, only to get rave reviews... just to prove the general public is moronic. I've always enjoyed Coen Bros. movies andJoel and Ethan...please confess your intentions to purposely write a horrible script and then load up the cast with A-Listers, only to get rave reviews... just to prove the general public is moronic. I've always enjoyed Coen Bros. movies and "got" them, but this one is simply awful. I honestly think it was a test to see if they could successfully pull the wool over peoples eyes.… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

3

MotojohnnoMar 13, 2016

Decided to see this because it's a Coen bros movie. Yes; great cast; Yes; fabulous period detail, sets etc. Yes, nice concept. HOWEVER....it's not actually very funny. Perhaps I was negatively influenced by the elderly ladies next to me whoDecided to see this because it's a Coen bros movie. Yes; great cast; Yes; fabulous period detail, sets etc. Yes, nice concept. HOWEVER....it's not actually very funny. Perhaps I was negatively influenced by the elderly ladies next to me who giggled inanely and incessantly through every scene. But, seriously most scenes warrant a couple of smiles at best. Josh Brolin is perfect, as is Alden Ehrenreich. Clooney is good as a grinning buffoon (if that's what amuses you). Tilda Swinton does a great job with her one-dimensional character. The cast is largely wasted. Scarlett Johansson shows huge promise but gets only short scenes. Ralph Fiennes is treated the same way - a terrible waste. Don't be fooled by the fawning critics' reviews.… Expand

6 of 8 users found this helpful62

All this user's reviews

4

Jess_HillFeb 28, 2016

This was a disappointing film which is difficult to categorise, as it's comprised of a series of self-aware film cliches strung together in an attempt to form some kind of meta commentary on the nature of film itself (I think). There areThis was a disappointing film which is difficult to categorise, as it's comprised of a series of self-aware film cliches strung together in an attempt to form some kind of meta commentary on the nature of film itself (I think). There are laughs to be had, but only as a result of singular sequences, the storyline being too esoteric to enjoy in a broader sense. The performances, really just a sequence of cameos, are good but contrived, caricature rather than substantive. An oddity without substance. 4.02/10… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

0

sidfalcoFeb 11, 2016

Easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. All of the "funny" bits - actually not funny at all - are in the trailer. The rest of the movie is an embarrassment, with the exception of Josh Brolin, who is good in a meaningless and boringEasily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. All of the "funny" bits - actually not funny at all - are in the trailer. The rest of the movie is an embarrassment, with the exception of Josh Brolin, who is good in a meaningless and boring role.

I'm sure even the Coen brothers know it sucks, hence the voiceover - meaningless, intermittent and a sure sign that it would have been even worse without it - difficult - and made even less sense - more difficult.

Dreadful beyond words, save your money.… Expand

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

5

donnelbrFeb 5, 2016

Seems like a film made FOR Hollywood to laugh at itself. Too bad it's not funny for the rest of us. Don't get me wrong, it's a somewhat interesting film, full of caricatures. It, and the plot, barely held my interest. The Channing TatumSeems like a film made FOR Hollywood to laugh at itself. Too bad it's not funny for the rest of us. Don't get me wrong, it's a somewhat interesting film, full of caricatures. It, and the plot, barely held my interest. The Channing Tatum dance scene leverages his talents, and is well directed. ...altogether a solid film. It's just that my date and I were looking at our watches the whole film, and time definitely did not fly. For a film so highly regarded by the critics, it was a slog for us.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

0

FizzMoFeb 20, 2016

The only movie ever that rivals Ice Pirates for awfulness. There is literally nothing else to say. What any critic saw in this, I'm not sure. I can only assume they were ashamed to pan a film with Clooney in it.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

freviewsFeb 17, 2016

This movie was supposed to be a comedy???? Than why did they put all the funny parts in the trailer????? Why do they even have the blonde haired lady in the movie, it doesn't make sense, it doesn't relate to the overarching plot, so why???? IThis movie was supposed to be a comedy???? Than why did they put all the funny parts in the trailer????? Why do they even have the blonde haired lady in the movie, it doesn't make sense, it doesn't relate to the overarching plot, so why???? I do NOT want to see this movie ever again in my life!!!!… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

AthosmrFeb 15, 2016

This was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Going in, my wife & I both thought it would be funny. It wasn't close. We thought about walking out several times but since we had paid to see it, we hoped it would get better. It didn't.This was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Going in, my wife & I both thought it would be funny. It wasn't close. We thought about walking out several times but since we had paid to see it, we hoped it would get better. It didn't. It was dry, it was boring (I nearly fell asleep a few times), it was disjointed & hard to follow. For a movie that had so many stars, it fell flat as a pancake.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

Acehack1Feb 16, 2016

Please do not waste you time with this movie!!. We walked out with others behind us. Felt sorry for the ones we left behind. Mass confusion nothing seemed to fit together. Very boring with nothing being said for lengths of time. WaitPlease do not waste you time with this movie!!. We walked out with others behind us. Felt sorry for the ones we left behind. Mass confusion nothing seemed to fit together. Very boring with nothing being said for lengths of time. Wait until it comes out on DVD and you'll cuss yourself for ever renting it.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

DeclanDMar 6, 2016

It's been a while since I've seen a film this grotesquely bad, and the first time in my life I have ever walked out the cinema before the end to demand my money back, not only that but it has made me feel the need to create a metacriticIt's been a while since I've seen a film this grotesquely bad, and the first time in my life I have ever walked out the cinema before the end to demand my money back, not only that but it has made me feel the need to create a metacritic account to save any poor souls who may think about seeing this film. My mother even fell asleep during the film. Not only does this 'film' suffer from being incredibly boring, with little to no plot, but it creates so many film travesties. The acting is well, rather poor, but I feel they did this on purpose for some stupid inside joke. The characters are less than 1 dimensional, the humor was embarrassing, we had huge moments of silence during the (mostly slapstick) 'comedy' segments in the cinema. I can't even pick apart the plot of this film because it did not have one.

The largest culprit was these stupid scenes where they would introduce a largely pointless character mid way through the movie or near the end, who would have a flamboyant, nearly 15 minute entrance, then that was it for them, or they appeared later in the movie to tie up some half assed plot point which made no sense.

Please save your money, watch something else or save it by doing literally anything else. This was barely even a film, it was just people moving around poorly interconnected by half assed writing and scenes.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

4

McGillotineFeb 26, 2016

The Coen Brothers sure do a hell of a job, accomplishing nothing in Hail Caesar, from characters to general plot and progression, there is a serious lack of substance within the film leading way to excessive confusion and boredom. It alsoThe Coen Brothers sure do a hell of a job, accomplishing nothing in Hail Caesar, from characters to general plot and progression, there is a serious lack of substance within the film leading way to excessive confusion and boredom. It also holds my record for most people to walk out on a film accumulating half the cinema getting up to refund their tickets, which surprisingly became more entertaining than the movie itself.

Now if you are planning to watch this movie please help yourself, to these few things to better your experience. 1st. hit yourself with an adrenaline shot before the film, so you don't have ushers trying to wake you 5 hours after the movie has ended 2nd. Sticky tape your eyebrows to your forehead, because with the brief screen time some actors have, you will have missed them in the time it take to blink and 3rd and finally don't go in with any expectations at all or you will be guaranteed to be disapointed

Now where credits is due is to Brolin and Ehrenreich who make the most of the films pretentious script whereas every other actor and actress who shares a piece of the small spotlight seemed to have had a care factor of zero, when reading the weak and intolerable screenplay. Written with the same amount of care and consideration involved in trying to to miss the toilet seat while peeing.

Hail Caesar, isn't funny it isn't intelligent and most of the struggle behind the movie is trying to figure out exactly what it was supposed to be.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

BingBongMar 13, 2016

I went to watch this with high hopes, and the first 30 minutes were great, actually had me laughing at one point. And then it just slowed down and began meandering along, like an amiable, slightly drunk uncle after a good meal wandering roundI went to watch this with high hopes, and the first 30 minutes were great, actually had me laughing at one point. And then it just slowed down and began meandering along, like an amiable, slightly drunk uncle after a good meal wandering round the garden looking for somewhere to rest his weary bones. Mind you, I've often noticed this with the Coen's work. Start off with zip and inventiveness and then run out of steam and become unnecessarily wordy. 'No country for old men,' for example, and 'burn after reading.' Only, TBH, this last was pretty flat from the getgo.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

YellowKirbyMar 12, 2016

While certainly enjoyable, 'Hail, Caesar!' failed to live up to my expectations, as it not only produced less laughs than I expected, but also underused some of its greatest and most interesting characters and set-pieces. The plot seemed lazyWhile certainly enjoyable, 'Hail, Caesar!' failed to live up to my expectations, as it not only produced less laughs than I expected, but also underused some of its greatest and most interesting characters and set-pieces. The plot seemed lazy and wore thin after a while, and the best scenes are those on the sets of the movies within the movie.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

Masked_One7240Apr 9, 2016

The plot was weak and I didn't even know what was happening throughout the movie. Extremely weak 'comedy'. A-grade cast members were also very under-used with Jonah Hill appearing for less than two minutes,Scarlett Johansson apearing in onlyThe plot was weak and I didn't even know what was happening throughout the movie. Extremely weak 'comedy'. A-grade cast members were also very under-used with Jonah Hill appearing for less than two minutes,Scarlett Johansson apearing in only two short scenes and Channing Tatum in a musical number and another short scene. The only part I really liked was the Channing Tatum musical number.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

3

KPWarriorApr 4, 2016

This film highlighted for me how far out of touch my opinions are with those of the critics. There are some great little sketches in the film replicating some of the classic movie genres of the era. However the linking together of pieces isThis film highlighted for me how far out of touch my opinions are with those of the critics. There are some great little sketches in the film replicating some of the classic movie genres of the era. However the linking together of pieces is awful. There is no character development and many of the story threads are wasted or just left hanging in mid air. My worst film of the year.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

3

Shark_SandwichApr 15, 2016

Not very good. While Hail, Caesar! had some fun moments I just couldn't find a way to give a **** about any of the characters. I like most of the Coen brother's movies, and their good ones are fantastic, but man they can make a bad movie too.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

movielover49Feb 6, 2016

This is a generous rating given that the movie is without real spirit. Lots of fine actors, none of whom are given any real room to develop their characters. The trailer was funny and energetic, neither of which the movie actually is. A sadThis is a generous rating given that the movie is without real spirit. Lots of fine actors, none of whom are given any real room to develop their characters. The trailer was funny and energetic, neither of which the movie actually is. A sad contribution to the Coen brothers' body of work.… Expand

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

0

kaminFeb 12, 2016

This is one of the worst movies ever and caused me to write my first review on Metacritic after many years of relying on it for user reviews. This felt like the Hollywood inside culture of private humor that only the so-called elite actorsThis is one of the worst movies ever and caused me to write my first review on Metacritic after many years of relying on it for user reviews. This felt like the Hollywood inside culture of private humor that only the so-called elite actors of a closed niche group could be admitted. I only went to see it to appease a family member. Just a film to fill the egos of all who acted in it and who created this complete piece of garbage. Of course some of the so-called movie critics like it. They are in the tank for the people in the film personally and politically.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

0

OhgodthatmovieFeb 12, 2016

Awful waste of time. One of the worst films to start out 2016 with. It goes no where. Don't watch it. It's a waste of money. The reason i made this account. Good day :)

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

1

HonestjonMar 12, 2016

On the way to the cinema with the wife and she asks "is there anything else on, other than Deadpool? I don't feel in the mood for a sweary,violent film, I'd rather watch a comedy" ......or something like that. So I did a quick search ofOn the way to the cinema with the wife and she asks "is there anything else on, other than Deadpool? I don't feel in the mood for a sweary,violent film, I'd rather watch a comedy" ......or something like that. So I did a quick search of listings and noticed Hail, Caesar! I checked reviews and Mark Kermode absolutely waxed lyrical. Sold! We left early. worst film I've ever seen.. Filled with stars but just not funny… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

1

TheKavehJFeb 6, 2016

Hail, Caesar makes working at a movie studio seem awful. The story line is dull, the film is long, and the film fails to deliver any laughs. The Coen Brothers disappoint.

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

2

DotdaveFeb 10, 2016

Misused cast- full of Hollywood "inside " jokes and references that go nowhere- almost fell asleep, but stayed thinking it would get better, it didn't - save your money. Guess even the magic touch of the Coen brothers can't pull a rabbit outMisused cast- full of Hollywood "inside " jokes and references that go nowhere- almost fell asleep, but stayed thinking it would get better, it didn't - save your money. Guess even the magic touch of the Coen brothers can't pull a rabbit out of a worn out fedora.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

2

phillytomFeb 6, 2016

My wife and I just left watching "Hail Caesar". It is difficult for us to equate what we just wasted 2 hours on and what the critics scores they gave in their reviews. My wife I reached the conclusion that they were simply paid to write theMy wife and I just left watching "Hail Caesar". It is difficult for us to equate what we just wasted 2 hours on and what the critics scores they gave in their reviews. My wife I reached the conclusion that they were simply paid to write the reviews that they did. The movie was organized in a way that took a considerable number of old movie concepts and threw them against a wall. I assure NOT many stuck. Generally the Cohen brothers produce a quality product, they missed this time, BIG time. My wife said, "Give it a D-".… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

0

ngddgjFeb 9, 2016

Utterly F...ing terrible. The Coen Bros should know that since they are in the MOTION picture business, long, static philosophical diatribes dont really work in this medium. Write a book next time.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

0

jhepFeb 9, 2016

Where to begin !….the Coen Brothers’ cinematic food fight ……their In-Your-Face hissy fit …. their de-constructed parody OF a parody ..….whatever you decide to call it it’s an embarrassing mess made up of undigested plot morsels and themes andWhere to begin !….the Coen Brothers’ cinematic food fight ……their In-Your-Face hissy fit …. their de-constructed parody OF a parody ..….whatever you decide to call it it’s an embarrassing mess made up of undigested plot morsels and themes and feels INTERMINABLE to sit through……can this really be the same George Clooney, Tilda Swinton and Joel and Ethan Coen of the witty and razor-sharp “Burn After Reading” ? …..can this rambling, self-indulgent “smirk-fest” with its hastily assembled grab-bag of “bits” that RAPIDLY wear out their welcome, possibly be the work of the film-makers who made “A Serious Man” or “No Country For Old Men”?…….and, by the way, “The Robe” was actually quite an intelligent film and Richard Burton was terrific in it……so enough cinematic masturbation Ethan an Joel; time to get back to work.....enough already with the Food Fight Thing !… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

3

hotfromcauldronFeb 5, 2016

I went. I saw. I concluded. Hail Caesar! is a patch work quilt homage to old Hollywood that
is sloppily sewn together. There were some things I wanted more of others much less and nothing I really could sink my teeth into. I missed JohnI went. I saw. I concluded. Hail Caesar! is a patch work quilt homage to old Hollywood that
is sloppily sewn together. There were some things I wanted more of others much less and nothing I really could sink my teeth into. I missed John Goodman. After seeing Swinton and Fiennes - I wondered if Wes Anderson could have kept the lunacy going with a stronger narrative. Johansson had a good accent - Clooney and Tatum a gay old time - Hill a line. Me , betrayed - et tu Coens?… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

3

njlakeFeb 8, 2016

This is by far the worst Coen brothers movie. Really seemed like a mashup of a bunch of different stories that didn't seem to coincide at all. My favorite scene by far was with Ralph Fiennes... but that ended very quickly you don't seeThis is by far the worst Coen brothers movie. Really seemed like a mashup of a bunch of different stories that didn't seem to coincide at all. My favorite scene by far was with Ralph Fiennes... but that ended very quickly you don't see anything close to that quality throughout the rest of the movie unfortunately. It's sad because that scene is what felt most like a Coen bros. movie. In the end, the story was really weak and the characters were not well developed at all.… Expand

9 of 17 users found this helpful98

All this user's reviews

1

marco34laFeb 7, 2016

It is beyond reason that anyone in their right mind with a half an ounce of intelligence...could consider this film
anything more than a complete waste of celluloid. It was utterly painful... totally pointless. Clooney is so over-rated inIt is beyond reason that anyone in their right mind with a half an ounce of intelligence...could consider this film
anything more than a complete waste of celluloid. It was utterly painful... totally pointless. Clooney is so over-rated in general, and in this role, he's just plain idiotic. SKIP THIS… Expand

10 of 20 users found this helpful1010

All this user's reviews

0

BeingrealFeb 14, 2016

This was one of the worst movies I've ever wasted my time watching, Save your money! We actually left during the movie... it was that bad. Thanks Carmike Cinemas for the rain check.

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

4

acricketerFeb 5, 2016

"Infamy! infamy!, they've all got it in for me!" One of the best lines in comedy cinema history which passed through the lips of the late,great Kenneth Williams playing Julius Caesar in 'Carry on Caesar". You can't compete with that.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

TVJerryFeb 7, 2016

The latest from the Coen Brothers is a playful tribute to the Golden Age of Hollywood. The central character is a studio exec (Josh Brolin), who deals with his stars, directors and productions in one busy day. We also get treated to someThe latest from the Coen Brothers is a playful tribute to the Golden Age of Hollywood. The central character is a studio exec (Josh Brolin), who deals with his stars, directors and productions in one busy day. We also get treated to some delightful re-creations of classic styles (a Biblical epic, a Western, a Kelly-esque dance romp, an Esther Williams production number). The star-loaded cast (Clooney, Tatum, Johansson) gets to create some delightful types (Alden Ehrenreich is especially enjoyable as a sincere, simple cowboy). So far, sounds like lots of fun. Where it stumbles is tying it all together. The individual encounters are lively and peppered with the Coen’s cracked sense of humor. But the whole narrative doesn’t seam together smoothly and there’s more energy than laffs. A lesser film by the Brothers is still fun.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

GreatMartinFeb 5, 2016

"Hail, Caesar!" is a goldmine for film buffs and anyone familiar with the 'old' Hollywood, a time when studios ruled and took care of their stars and kept them out of jail. It was a time when a baby born out of wedlock would be adopted by her"Hail, Caesar!" is a goldmine for film buffs and anyone familiar with the 'old' Hollywood, a time when studios ruled and took care of their stars and kept them out of jail. It was a time when a baby born out of wedlock would be adopted by her movie star real mother. Was the story true about a director being fired because the actor had tricked with him before becoming a big time 'masculine' star? Who is the singing cowboy, (played by Alden Ehrenreich), the studio wants to turn into a drawing room star based on?

The best segment is a 'homage' to Gene Kelly, and films like "One The Town" and "Anchors Away", with Channing Tatum dancing up athletic tapping and acrobatic, flawless movements with homoerotic overtones to a song entitled "No Dames". The funniest segment is a scene with Frances McDormand editing this segment.

The story line of, possibly, the blacklisted 'Communist" writers kidnapping the star of the movie "Hail, Caesar!" ("Ben Hur" anyone?) played by George Clooney (Charleton Heston?) doiesn't really go anywhere but he seems to be having fun playing it for goofiness.

There are a few scenes that just don't work like Eddie Mannix, the 'fixer', played by Josh Brolin in a somber, fedora clad, going to confession and confessing he smoked 2 to 3 cigarettes and slapping a contract player. There is also a scene that falls flat where Mannix is trying to get approval for the film from 4 religious readers. None of this is Brolin's fault but of the screenwriting.

Scarlott Johansson as DeeAnna Moran, really Esther Williams at least in the roles she played, replicates the swimming routine choreographed by Busby Berkeley in the original "Million Dollar Mermaid" and though not given enough to do looks great doing in it.

Veronica Osorio (Carmen Miranda?) shines in a small role while Ralph Fiennes (Vincent Minelli?) and Tilda Swinton (Louella Parsons and Hedda Hopper?) are given little to do but do what they can with what they are given.

Directed and written by Joel Coen and Ethan Coen the movie is not up to par in either position. Though offering a few laughs "Hail, Caesar!" is more enjoyed for the guessing game that holds interest for those who know movies and/or remember the scandals of yesterday.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

3

yezoFeb 27, 2016

The movie is not great. The script and story is boring and uninteresting. To give it some credit, part of the movie is funny but not in intellectual level but like clown funny which is disappointing.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

2

mnbykjakFeb 24, 2016

This movie was novel, in a kooky kind of Coen Bros. way. But, unlike some of their other movies, for example Oh Brother Where Art Thou?, it was incredibly boring. My husband will watch almost any movie, but even he went to refill his soda!This movie was novel, in a kooky kind of Coen Bros. way. But, unlike some of their other movies, for example Oh Brother Where Art Thou?, it was incredibly boring. My husband will watch almost any movie, but even he went to refill his soda! Other than some incredible dancing from Channing Tatum and a beautiful synchronized swimming scene, I was so bored. How this can be called a "mystery" movie I have no clue. There was zero tension and intrigue.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

1

csw12May 31, 2016

Hail, Caesar is a absolute pile of garbage. The worst film I've seen this year. Not funny and extremely stupid..............................................

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Cassio-MartinsMar 3, 2017

A good movie set in 1950's, a part of Hollywood greatest history, shows the life of a "fixer" (portrayed by the always great Josh Brolin) and his stars,in a studio amazed by big productions like the main title: Hail, Caesar!
Another good jobA good movie set in 1950's, a part of Hollywood greatest history, shows the life of a "fixer" (portrayed by the always great Josh Brolin) and his stars,in a studio amazed by big productions like the main title: Hail, Caesar!
Another good job by the Coen brothers, who developed a good comedy and a funny satire.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

BshopFeb 5, 2016

Mildly entertaining. Some characters fell flat, while others were outstanding.
When it ending, it seemed abrupt (like there was meant to be more)?
In summary, wait for it on DVD or Redbox. Not worth the admission, unless maybe you like meta-movies.

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

0

JosephjwinFeb 14, 2016

Took my gf to see this at Willoughby Commons 16 in Northeast Ohio on Feb 13th. We both almost fell asleep at this horrendously boring movie. We were both waiting for something to happen where the movie might pick up pace and some form ofTook my gf to see this at Willoughby Commons 16 in Northeast Ohio on Feb 13th. We both almost fell asleep at this horrendously boring movie. We were both waiting for something to happen where the movie might pick up pace and some form of understanding might become of this pathetic plot, but nothing the movie offered muttered the slightest hint of entertainment. After over and hour and 20 minutes of time we will never get back in our lives, we finally walked out and got a refund for this insult to great films abroad. Please, don't waste your money!!!!… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

2

biokenjistryFeb 9, 2016

I get that there were huge ties to the Bible. I get that the communists and the submarine were analogies to the 12 disciples and Jesus Christ's ascent to heaven. I get that the pregnancy and a stand in father were analogies to the ImmaculateI get that there were huge ties to the Bible. I get that the communists and the submarine were analogies to the 12 disciples and Jesus Christ's ascent to heaven. I get that the pregnancy and a stand in father were analogies to the Immaculate Conception and Joseph/Joe. But just because there's symbolism in the movie, doesn't give it an excuse for being plodding and dry for two thirds of the movie, and having a unsatisfactory payoff with a hastily resolved ending. Maybe this movie would be good to pick apart in film school, but save your money, it's terrible entertainment.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

BrianMcCriticJun 8, 2016

While this is not a Coen Brothers classic it's also far from a dud. This love letter to old Hollywood still has some great dialogue and has terrific performances throughout. B+

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

10

JazzyJayFeb 6, 2016

This is a great movie by any measure. It's an entertainment on the surface, with startling stunts, huge sets, technical dance numbers, entertaining "bits", great music both as background and foreground, beautiful places and cinematographyThis is a great movie by any measure. It's an entertainment on the surface, with startling stunts, huge sets, technical dance numbers, entertaining "bits", great music both as background and foreground, beautiful places and cinematography and characters that tie all these things together. Attempting to disassemble any part of this juggling act in the act of judging the Movie is to miss the whole point of the movie. It is designed to work as a "meta" meta. Whether or not you agree with the espoused mature outlook and body politic hidden within the clever script and whether or not you choose to pull outward and see how actually genius the entire presentation is as a whole, you can't help but be entertained by this product of Hollywood about Hollywood using the "language" of Hollywood. Like I said, pure genius and I left with a smile on my face.… Expand

12 of 32 users found this helpful1220

All this user's reviews

2

EvilEyebrowBoyFeb 6, 2016

So disappointing. The basic premise is that a Hollywood actor in the 1950s is kidnapped by communists. Sounds like the setup for a brilliant comedy, right. Nope. While it does get out some good jokes, the acting is too serious for a premiseSo disappointing. The basic premise is that a Hollywood actor in the 1950s is kidnapped by communists. Sounds like the setup for a brilliant comedy, right. Nope. While it does get out some good jokes, the acting is too serious for a premise so wacky. It should be over the top and ridiculous, but it's not! The jokes are to infrequent, and the climax is completely underwhelming. If only they had just had someone else make a movie based off the trailer. So sad to see such a brilliant idea wasted… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

0

YarkerFeb 13, 2016

Worst movie I have ever seen. Wish I could get money and time back! Would give a minus rating if that was an option. Whole theatre boo'd at the end. Not worth watching...

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

8

tropicAcesFeb 10, 2016

I love 1950s Los Angeles and movies, so maybe I'm biased, but I had a blast with this movie. It offers a great look at the making of movies, and even if each actor besides Clooney and Brolin only have two scenes, there's a lot of fun to beI love 1950s Los Angeles and movies, so maybe I'm biased, but I had a blast with this movie. It offers a great look at the making of movies, and even if each actor besides Clooney and Brolin only have two scenes, there's a lot of fun to be had with this if you know what you're going into.… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

1

TheMetacritiqerFeb 6, 2016

Perfect for those who grew up in this era. However, young people should steer clear of this trashypiece. Could well be one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Is that more than 150 characters?

6 of 18 users found this helpful612

All this user's reviews

7

Brent_MarchantFeb 6, 2016

"Hail, Caesar!" offers viewers a fine collection of characters, moments and style, but, unfortunately, it lacks the glue that holds them all together well. It's entertaining, to be sure, but not entirely satisfying, something I'd expect more"Hail, Caesar!" offers viewers a fine collection of characters, moments and style, but, unfortunately, it lacks the glue that holds them all together well. It's entertaining, to be sure, but not entirely satisfying, something I'd expect more of when it comes to a Coen Brothers film. Take it for what it's worth, but don't say you weren't warned if you walk away disappointed.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

7

jrodfilmsFeb 6, 2016

why is this film getting bad reviews? i actually liked it! but keep in mind, this is josh brolins movie, not george clooneys. its a bit clunky and unever, takes a while to get going. but i was sucked in.

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

7

JacobAug 14, 2016

Overall I enjoyed Hail Caesar! The setting was outstanding and the cast was phenomenal and I wish the film ahd given them both more to do. As it is it is still an entertaining film even with little action. Perhaps repeat viewings will give meOverall I enjoyed Hail Caesar! The setting was outstanding and the cast was phenomenal and I wish the film ahd given them both more to do. As it is it is still an entertaining film even with little action. Perhaps repeat viewings will give me more appreciation for the film and its nuances or make its flaws gape out.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

bttrmoviesFeb 6, 2016

FIVE SENTENCE REVIEW:

Let me start by saying that not everyone will love "Hail, Caesar" - in fact I would imagine the split will be pretty 50-50 between really adoring it and full blown hating it. This is something that I think the CoenFIVE SENTENCE REVIEW:

Let me start by saying that not everyone will love "Hail, Caesar" - in fact I would imagine the split will be pretty 50-50 between really adoring it and full blown hating it. This is something that I think the Coen Brothers do well, though; a lot of my friends and family can't really stand them and unless you are in the mindset of watching one of their movies it can be a real chore to get through. So now that the warning is out of the way, I'll say that I really enjoyed this movie, with a cast that seems to be having fun, a love letter to the "golden age" of Hollywood, and a movie that pokes holes into what that era - which provided many classics - really meant for those who worked in it. Josh Brolin shines as the lead in this film and becomes the boss and manager of the crazy cast of people on the film set for the imaginary company he runs, and he brisks through the movie at a break neck pace that could come off as lazy writing but is done so well that it helps define the character. Most roles here outside of Brolin and perhaps Clooney really come off more as cameos, but they are done well and weave together rather effortlessly, making it an enjoyable and short watch.

FULL LENGTH REVIEW:

As I sat in the theater waiting for this movie to begin, I got myself ready. There are a few directors I have to do this with. Wes Anderson, Charlie Kaufman, and the Coens instantly come to mind. I knew I was about to see something with characters who are so well defined yet seem to ridiculous and over the top that they could not possibly exist in the real world. And despite this, they feel so fleshed out and real that they must exist in more than just the mind of the writer. But preparing myself for this and being met with it become two different things, as I don't think anyone can ever really be completely ready for a Coen Brothers film.

"Hail, Caesar," named after the epic being filmed at the studio where the film takes place, is really a satirical love letter to the "Golden Age" of Hollywood, where film studios were run like factories and movie after movie were churned out on the assembly line and put on the silver screen. Hollywood felt like a world completely removed from reality, although that probably still is true to a certain degree. At the center of this studio kingdom is Eddie Mannix, played wonderfully by Josh Brolin. Brolin brings a bravado and calm handle to the film that it really needs, as the rest of it seems to be filled with overly eccentric and out of control directors and actors.

Mannix is thrown for a loop, however, when the lead of his big epic being filmed (played in an effective if not a little too airheaded manner by George Clooney) is kidnapped. Mannix, while dealing with all the other problems being presented around his studio, must quietly resolve this or risk losing total control of his studio. The story, which features a lot of moving parts and a cast made up almost entirely of cameos (Jonah Hill, Scarlett Johannson, and Channing Tatum are in the movie for the briefest of moments - although they are done well), seems like it is complicated but in reality is quite simple. Mannix is simply a studio head/fixer, who is trying to keep his machine running as smoothly as possible.

Under this story is a deep love letter to classic Hollywood, complete with the film archetypes of the era. Musicals, dance movies, epic movies, Westerns, and Broadway adaptations all get screen time as the movie moves through the studio. Stars have exclusive deals that keep them tied to the whims of the studio, and all troubles are swept under the rug to keep their stars looking innocent and pristine. It is in this vein, however, that it also plays out as a sort of satire. Writers are shown to be mainly Communists, the studio heads abuse their stars and control everyone, and the winning religion - which plays well hand in hand with the fictitious "Hail, Caesar" being filmed in the movie - is the film studio. It becomes a little heavy handed at times, and the writing can be a little too dense in some areas, although that is something that goes through many recent Coen Brothers comedies.

The movie, despite some shortcomings and potentially wasted talents, is very effective. The real scene stealer here may be relative newcomer Alden Ehrenreich, who plays a young Western star forced into more serious roles despite being a less than proficient actor. His naive attitude and dedication to the studio and director really shines, and played to near perfection by the young actor. All in all, this movie is fun, lighthearted, humorous, and a well done satirical love letter to classic Hollywood. If you like the Coen Brothers, you will like this movie. If you liked "The Artist," you will like this movie, despite some shortcomings.

I give Hail, Caesar a B.… Expand

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

8

SpangleFeb 6, 2016

I loved Hail, Caesar. An absolutely hilarious homage and piece of social commentary (politics, Hollywood, human nature, etc.), Hail, Caesar is a really a movie about movies made for people who love movies and their history. Touching on allI loved Hail, Caesar. An absolutely hilarious homage and piece of social commentary (politics, Hollywood, human nature, etc.), Hail, Caesar is a really a movie about movies made for people who love movies and their history. Touching on all the key movements of the 1950s from the classic films to the politics therein, the film really skewers the time period and entertains along the way. Lavishly crafted with fantastic production and costume design, the film both looks and sounds the part. Channing Tatum honestly stole the show for me comedically, as all of his parts were hysterical. George Clooney, Josh Brolin, and Alden Ehrenhich, were the real stars here and knocked it out of the park. Ralph Fiennes, Tilda Swinton, and Frances McDormand, were also very good in smaller roles. Overall, Hail, Caesar is an absolute riot if you love film and film history. It appears many moviegoers thought it would be more of a serious kidnapping type movie, but if you know anything about the Coen Brothers, you know there is always more than meets the eye in their films and their classic kidnapping trademark. This is very much the case in their latest work. Overall, the film was phenomenal and really sets the standard for forthcoming releases this year.… Expand

6 of 20 users found this helpful614

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24Feb 6, 2016

It may have something to do with the supremely high standards set by the Coen Brothers' stellar filmography, but there is certainly something missing from "Hail, Caesar!" Perhaps, it's the narrative at hand, which seems to clearly lack aIt may have something to do with the supremely high standards set by the Coen Brothers' stellar filmography, but there is certainly something missing from "Hail, Caesar!" Perhaps, it's the narrative at hand, which seems to clearly lack a sense of cohesion amongst its bizarre moving parts. Maybe it has something to do with the undercooked feel of the film's final act, or the heavy handed antics of the movie's philosophical platform. Still though, as disappointing as these elements may be, make no mistake - "Hail, Caesar!" is a surprisingly enjoyable comedy, with delightfully entertaining performances from Josh Brolin, George Clooney, and newcomer Alden Ehrenreich. The bitingly outlandish humor is also a shining element of this tribute to cinema's golden age. Sure, the Coen Brothers might not be at the top of their narrative game, but that comedic right hook is still a knockout.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

8

DanBurritoMar 13, 2016

Hail, Caesar may be a little bit underwhelming in some aspects, but it's a very entertaining film with great set pieces and a committed cast. The movie's main flaw was its somewhat slow pace - I felt it needed a bit more energy. And theHail, Caesar may be a little bit underwhelming in some aspects, but it's a very entertaining film with great set pieces and a committed cast. The movie's main flaw was its somewhat slow pace - I felt it needed a bit more energy. And the kidnapping of Clooney's character didn't seem necessary to the plot. But all complaints aside, I enjoyed it very much. The scenes on the various set pieces of the various films were easily the best. George Clooney was in top form, and the rest of the cast were great too. Josh Brolin played his character well, with Scarlett Johansson, Alden Ehrenreich and Ralph Fiennes to name a few turning in highly impressive supporting performances. The production design was amazing. They deserve an Oscar for that. FINAL VERDICT: Hail, Caesar may prove frustrating to some (and you probably need to be a movie-buff to fully appreciate it) but it's a solid Coen Brothers flick and an affectionate, humorous tribute to Hollywood's golden age that should satisfy fans of old cinema. 7.5/10.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeFeb 5, 2016

Highly fun and enjoyable. The mixed reviews are from people and their opinions in which you cannot trust or this review. You can mark it helpful if it's really helpful.

4 of 16 users found this helpful412

All this user's reviews

8

tjman09Feb 6, 2016

Hail, Caesar! as a film feels very much like an attempt by the Coen Brothers to make an old-fashioned Hollywood film, in a day and age where it is not accepted. For those who love the films of 1950’s Hollywood, and the general history ofHail, Caesar! as a film feels very much like an attempt by the Coen Brothers to make an old-fashioned Hollywood film, in a day and age where it is not accepted. For those who love the films of 1950’s Hollywood, and the general history of Hollywood this film is a great way to spend time. Hail, Caesar! is funny, well shot, but lacks the memorable stature of the previous Coen Brothers films. For those who love Coen Brother’s films this is not there best, but is still enjoyable.

Not that it is all that surprising but this film has quite a few moments that are truly laugh-out-loud funny, but the humor is more subtle. It should be noted that the film is not as funny as The Big Lebowski, so those hoping for another Coen Brothers comedy classic it may not be that funny. Another small problem with the humor is that while the film is funny, many of the funnier jokes are in the trailer, and naturally the film lacks surprises.

Another trademark of the Coen Brothers is there beautiful cinematography, thanks to cinematographer Roger Deakins. It seems ironic watching it because the film is set in 50’s Hollywood and the film reels they watch look like some of the cleanest film of today. The overall look of the film is mesmerizing, and may be honored a year from now for it’s cinematography. However, in many aspects the film falls short of the expectations that the Coen Brothers deserve today.

While the film is a good and solid entry it has a few too many weaknesses. The villains of the film are a little weak, and because of the crowded story are never really fleshed out in a realistic way. On top of that the story is a little weak, often taking detours that aren’t necessary, and often feeling as though what we’re seeing isn’t all that important. The film also seems to gloss over the consequences of characters actions, and tries to just be funny, but not over the top just subtly funny, which doesn’t quite jive.
In the end Hail, Caesar is a comedy for the thinking man who doesn’t like the modern comedies that are often dumb and overbearing. Hail, Caesar is a film that looks back at 50’s Hollywood lovingly, and for that reason is a great film for film buffs, especially those that love classic Hollywood. However, if you’re expecting a great comedy that is both subtle, and brilliant like The Big Lebowski, this isn’t quite that.… Expand

3 of 13 users found this helpful310

All this user's reviews

0

KITTY6May 18, 2016

Hale Ceaser !! Sorry mr Clooney and co i only paid £4 and a free cup of coffee to see this film i wish i had drank my cup of coffee and not watched the film

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

GinaKFeb 14, 2016

I went to this film with my sister who has an encyclopedic knowledge of Hollywood lore. She loved this film and I give it an 8 in her honor. She said to me later, “I guess you don’t know what Dashiell Hammett looked like” (all the actorsI went to this film with my sister who has an encyclopedic knowledge of Hollywood lore. She loved this film and I give it an 8 in her honor. She said to me later, “I guess you don’t know what Dashiell Hammett looked like” (all the actors playing the kidnappers were chosen to look like famous “studio”-connected people of the era). She also reminded me that Loretta Young adopted her own child (fathered by Clark Gable), just like an actress in the film almost does, and told me about the rumors that Eddie Mannix (who really existed) supposedly had George Reeves (Superman) murdered because of his affair with Mannix’s promiscuous wife, most of whose affairs he tolerated. So I can see why many critics had high praise for this film. I thought the film was fun, but I yawned a lot at times, luckily not as loudly as a man behind us. But if you know all the old stories, you’ll love this film.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

9

SaikronFeb 9, 2016

This is possibly the most self-indulgent work by any writer/directors that I have ever seen, but it somehow works out into a movie that I love.

It's essentially a bittersweet love letter from the Coens to Old Hollywood, the gist of whichThis is possibly the most self-indulgent work by any writer/directors that I have ever seen, but it somehow works out into a movie that I love.

It's essentially a bittersweet love letter from the Coens to Old Hollywood, the gist of which is "I'm sorry we batter each other sometimes, but you're worth it." It's told in a zany, 24+ hour workday of a fictionalized Eddie Mannix, Old Hollywood executive and producer.

I think many users' complaints that the stories seem disjointed and the characters seem underdeveloped come from not giving Mannix the proper level of consideration. The scenes inspired by Old Hollywood aren't just thrown in because the Coen's felt like it (though that is one big reason for sure), those scenes are also what make the business worth it to Mannix. The other characters are certainly interesting, but they're there to help us decide if Mannix should stay at Capitol Pictures or leave for a more mainstream career. They aren't separate, unexplored storylines. There is only one storyline: "Should Mannix go to Lockheed or not?"

I'm a big fan of the movies from the 30s and 40s which the real Mannix worked on, so I think the Coens and I agree that it is worth it, even if we are "just" making aquamusicals and superhero movies.

If none of that's for you, I think the movie can also get by just based on slapstick comedy alone.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

9

NBNEFeb 20, 2016

Excellent. Great retrospective of and farce about the studio era. There's much to mine if you keep alert with the dialogue and multiple plot lines. A lot of fun.

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

7

Rebecca31Mar 4, 2016

An arthouse movie by Joel and Ethan Coen, set in 1950s Hollywood, starring Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Ralph Fiennes and the list goes on. This might divide people significantly but if you want to see a throwback to the Golden Age of cinema,An arthouse movie by Joel and Ethan Coen, set in 1950s Hollywood, starring Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Ralph Fiennes and the list goes on. This might divide people significantly but if you want to see a throwback to the Golden Age of cinema, fantastic acting, beautiful shots and set pieces, and Channing-Potato-Face-Tatum singing and dancing in a sailor suit (I could have happily lived the rest of my life without that last one but it's too late now). I personally enjoyed this, but it's no Fargo. Let me put it this way, if you're the type of person who hasn't heard of the Coen Brothers then you might want to give this a miss, but for everyone else it’s a definite recommendation.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

9

Mack_FraserFeb 7, 2016

Hail, Caesar! is a film cut from the same cloth as Barton Fink, Inside Llewyn Davis and The Man Who Wasn't There despite what the trailers may be selling you. This is the Coen Brother's in high art film mode although perhaps more subtly thanHail, Caesar! is a film cut from the same cloth as Barton Fink, Inside Llewyn Davis and The Man Who Wasn't There despite what the trailers may be selling you. This is the Coen Brother's in high art film mode although perhaps more subtly than their previous efforts. Hail, Caesar! is a film more concerned with examining structures of belief that people dedicate themselves to (communism, capitalism, religion and cinema/art specifically) and their relative merit or lack thereof than telling a tight, fast-paced story. It's also affords the brothers Coen a chance to play around in the classic Hollywood sandbox to varying degrees of success (the parlour drama 'Merrily We Dance' is the only movie-within-the-movie that completely captures the aesthetic of the time although the rest are still fun). Consequently, the central story, such as it is, is not as strong as in some of their films like True Grit, Fargo or No Country for Old Men, but that is by design - it's a just a framework for what they're really interested in and the more languid pace actually gives it something of that 1950's old Hollywood vibe.

Slight side note, the ad campaign for this movie did it no favours. It was sold as a movie more in the vein of The Big Lebowski or Raising Arizona - still very Coen brothers, but more in the screwball comedy vein which it really isn't. I'm willing to bet that the critical consensus on this film will rise given time as people recalibrate their expectations as to what the film is trying to do.… Expand

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

6

BHBarryFeb 7, 2016

"Hail, Caesar" boasts an all star cast including Channing Tatum, Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Frances McDormand, Jonah Hill, Elden Ehrenreich, Ralph Fiennes, Scarlett Johansson and Tilda Swinton and was co-written and directed by Joel and"Hail, Caesar" boasts an all star cast including Channing Tatum, Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Frances McDormand, Jonah Hill, Elden Ehrenreich, Ralph Fiennes, Scarlett Johansson and Tilda Swinton and was co-written and directed by Joel and Ethan Coen. Given this stellar list of talented actors, writers and directors, I eagerly anticipated viewing this attempted satire of 1950’s Hollywood but, unfortunately, I was greatly disappointed for the advertised brand was significantly better than the product. With so much material available, the Coens missed almost every opportunity to make the film work and could have elicited genuine laughter instead of only a slight smile or grin from an audience anxiously wanting and hoping for more. It should also be noted that Mr. Clooney and Ms. Johansson, two charismatic and generally enjoyable actors to watch, should not attempt slapstick comedy for the result is more tragic than humorous. Also, the film with many subplots never properly allows any of them to develop and what could have been a clever spoof of making films in the mid 20th Century becomes a poor but unsuccessful attempt to be funny. Knowing what could have been achieved but wasn’t is even more frustrating. Difficult to understand, too, is that so many reputable critics have applauded this film apparently judging the proverbial "book" by its cover rather than its contents. I give the film a6.0 rating 2 stars suggesting that the Coens owed the viewers and their own tremendous talents more than they were able to achieve in their latest theatrical endeavor.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

6

netflicFeb 17, 2016

Overall, the movie is at times amusing but not memorable. Definitely, not one of the best produced by Coen brothers. For people closely familiar with Hollywood it should be a lot of fun though.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

owmynose9000Apr 6, 2016

Hail, Caesar is a time capsule of classic Hollywood movie production, an era which was unique and interesting to witness. This movie was entertaining but the overall plot was not up to par with other Cohen brother films. The plot wasn't veryHail, Caesar is a time capsule of classic Hollywood movie production, an era which was unique and interesting to witness. This movie was entertaining but the overall plot was not up to par with other Cohen brother films. The plot wasn't very satisfying but this was made up for with the great set pieces and performances by the cast of characters. The satirical nature of the plot was amusing but there were scenes that did suffer from weak dialogue. It isn't a must-see but is worth watching for the uniquely entertaining format used to present an era of classic Hollywood that is supported by a great cast and characters.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

beingryanjudeMar 7, 2016

Just as many Coen Bros. films, HAIL, CAESAR! is funny, genuine and nothing short of an exciting glimpse into Hollywood during the Golden Age of cinema. The film consistently references the past - if the jokes go over your head, this may beJust as many Coen Bros. films, HAIL, CAESAR! is funny, genuine and nothing short of an exciting glimpse into Hollywood during the Golden Age of cinema. The film consistently references the past - if the jokes go over your head, this may be why. Overall, gorgeous looking - and a heck of a cast.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

8

NickLikesMoviesApr 17, 2016

A really fun, exciting journey that doesn't really add up to anything. It's still beautifully shot and has a load of exciting and interesting characters. Alden Ehrenreich is gold here. And the Scarlett Johannson mermaid film scene is MAGIC.A really fun, exciting journey that doesn't really add up to anything. It's still beautifully shot and has a load of exciting and interesting characters. Alden Ehrenreich is gold here. And the Scarlett Johannson mermaid film scene is MAGIC.

Just a lot of fun.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

BobacriticFeb 14, 2016

Hail, Caesar!
Hail, Caesar! 2016
★★★★★ Added Listing everything this movie is "about" would be an exercise in absurdity (although that's kind of fitting, considering that most of--if not all of--the Coens' movies are exercises inHail, Caesar!
Hail, Caesar! 2016
★★★★★ Added

Listing everything this movie is "about" would be an exercise in absurdity (although that's kind of fitting, considering that most of--if not all of--the Coens' movies are exercises in absurdity). Need more time to digest this, but it's genius. A meta movie that plays like a series of movies-within-movies, whilst never getting so caught up in itself that you forget that you're watching a single film unto itself. That's the structural/stylistic approach of Hail, Caesar!, but I need to sleep on it before I can attempt to verbally lay out its thematic density.… Expand

0 of 11 users found this helpful011

All this user's reviews

10

vicyamusicgreatFeb 13, 2016

Odd coincidence that at this very time I'm reading a book that is strikingly similar to this film: Dickens' Little Dorrit; both are scathing reviews; the film a screed of an indictment of Hollywood and its misfits from the near-mid-20thOdd coincidence that at this very time I'm reading a book that is strikingly similar to this film: Dickens' Little Dorrit; both are scathing reviews; the film a screed of an indictment of Hollywood and its misfits from the near-mid-20th century, the novel a screed of an indictment, just as colorful I might add, of London "society" and its most unfortunate misfits, mid 19th century. Both are brilliant!… Expand

0 of 8 users found this helpful08

All this user's reviews

7

marcmyworksFeb 20, 2016

If not for some minor casting errors I would say this is a fully realised film. The Coen Brothers are masters at creating reality in small and intense situations. Though not a lot of the film is really necessary for the major plot, it createsIf not for some minor casting errors I would say this is a fully realised film. The Coen Brothers are masters at creating reality in small and intense situations. Though not a lot of the film is really necessary for the major plot, it creates different points of humour and interest in the main characters reality.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

6

moviemitch96Feb 16, 2016

I must admit that this was a very odd and uneven film. Despite promises from critics that film buffs such as myself and those familiar with Hollywood's golden age would enjoy this film, I really thought that it could've turned out a lotI must admit that this was a very odd and uneven film. Despite promises from critics that film buffs such as myself and those familiar with Hollywood's golden age would enjoy this film, I really thought that it could've turned out a lot better. Granted, there are some worthwhile performances from the A-list all-star cast, but even they weren't enough to make the film any better. And while the film was certainly meant to be a comedy and I did let out a chuckle or two, I found most of it to be very bland and straightforward. Overall, this is just another sign to me that the Coen Bros. are more or less losing their touch.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

oDjentoMar 27, 2016

Hail Caesar! Has gotten quite a bit of hate that I don’t believe it deserves, but I will admit it is one of the Coen Brothers weaker films.
The film is a throwback to the ‘golden age’ of cinema, and the film deals with the perception ofHail Caesar! Has gotten quite a bit of hate that I don’t believe it deserves, but I will admit it is one of the Coen Brothers weaker films.
The film is a throwback to the ‘golden age’ of cinema, and the film deals with the perception of their actors in which most people were told what to do not only with their careers but with their lifestyle. Josh Brolin’s character (Eddie Mannix) is the man who tries to hold it all together and wants to keep everything on a tight timescale (evident by the frequent use of his watch and time throughout the film). The film is also just a chance for the Coen Brothers to have fun and show off their film knowledge in the industry; and you can see how much fun each actor is having.
George Clooney is to be quite honest really just a McGuffin for the film, but he is still great in his role, Josh Brolin is pretty enjoyable too, and Ralph Fiennes is hilarious and brilliant as he is in almost everything but the actor that really steals the show is Alden Ehrenreich as Hobie Doyle. His character is loveable, hilariously unaware be a very caring and polite man. He may not be the best actor but he tries his best at adapting from his typical western films of little dialogue to a period drama and really wants to do well but he just can’t. Seriously, if there is any reason to go see this film it is for the scene between Alden and Ralph. It is a hysterical scene.
The film has a bundle of jokes but I feel many viewers may not fully get all of them as a lot of them are orientated around the jargon of the film industry. The film also references a lot of film industry trivia; for instance the film columnists who are based on real people and the scene in which Frances McDormund almost chokes herself to death on a film reel which references an actual person who died whilst their scarf got caught up in a film reel.
The films plot is debateable on how legitimate it actually is and does become a little too confusing getting towards the end but the script does allow for some hilariously entertaining scenes. Every actor is on point here but the best in the film are absolutely Alden and Ralph. If you are a big film industry buff you have to check this out but its downfall is definitely in how limited an audience can enjoy this. I enjoyed the film but I must admit it isn’t as consistent as other Coen Brother films and is quite inaccessible but there is definitely some people who will love this film and is probably going to gather a larger cult following later on in its life.
6.4/10… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

NerdConsultantMar 3, 2016

Hail Caesar is a rather well made movie but has rather an under developed script which is what really holds it back. The performances are all good even though most of the cast don’t get much to do and honestly it feels too short and it feelsHail Caesar is a rather well made movie but has rather an under developed script which is what really holds it back. The performances are all good even though most of the cast don’t get much to do and honestly it feels too short and it feels like it could have easily gone on longer. The film does have an excellent production design and is a perfect tribute to 1950’s cinema but I felt it could have given us more. The Coen brothers can make movies that have less structure and more just exist to be movies like The Big Lebowski, but I kind of preferred their more structured works like No Country For Old Men and True Grit where they are being kept on a leash because of their source material, when they are left on their own like they are with this movie, I think they can often go a bit too far, however on this occasion, I don’t think they go far enough and it reeks of them trying to bite off more than they could chew.

It’s not totally bad, this will be a very interesting film to watch on NetFlix on a movie night with your friends and you won’t come out hating it, a couple of moments really made me laugh. The film can be very entertaining at times which is a credit, it just doesn’t measure up to a perfect whole. Wait for it to come out on DVD and get it on a rental.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Unladenswallow0Mar 9, 2016

I liked the satire the most, thats where the film actually became enjoyable, especially the parts where they take jabs at the role of directors and actors. Parts of the film were actually funny, without trying to hard to be, which is great.I liked the satire the most, thats where the film actually became enjoyable, especially the parts where they take jabs at the role of directors and actors. Parts of the film were actually funny, without trying to hard to be, which is great. The majority of the movie was a meandering mess though, i didnt know where the hell it was going for the most part. When the Baltic black communist submarine came up out of the ocean to pick up Channing Tatum i soon began to realize that i may have had a stroke. The story itself was just weak, even when you make sense of it. A stronger writing board, with the same directorial set would have made this movie a hell of a lot more enjoyable than it was.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

WheelzFourReelzMar 29, 2016

There is a lot to like here. The performances are great, the cinematography is gorgeous, the humor is well-timed, and the filming of these movies are phenomenal. However, the story is such a sloppy, inconsistent mess, that it's tough toThere is a lot to like here. The performances are great, the cinematography is gorgeous, the humor is well-timed, and the filming of these movies are phenomenal. However, the story is such a sloppy, inconsistent mess, that it's tough to wholeheartedly recommend this one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TributeManFeb 20, 2016

Ave, Cohen!

Bracia Cohen po raz kolejny utrzymują mnie w przekonaniu, że są jednymi z najlepszych reżyserów w historii. Ich najnowsze dzieło opowiada historie producenta (27 godzin z jego życia), który stara się wypaść jak najlepiej wAve, Cohen!

Bracia Cohen po raz kolejny utrzymują mnie w przekonaniu, że są jednymi z najlepszych reżyserów w historii. Ich najnowsze dzieło opowiada historie producenta (27 godzin z jego życia), który stara się wypaść jak najlepiej w swojej pracy. Do tego ukazane jest jak działa machina zwana Hollywoodem.
Niestety nie mogę polecić każdemu tego filmu. Jest to najbardziej specyficzny film Cohenów i co za tym idzie zbiera bardzo złe opinie. Może dlatego, że dzisiejsze filmy przyzwyczaiły nas do prostych historii z kompletnie nie złożonymi bohaterami. Śmieszą mnie te wszystkie recenzje gdzie pisze się o braku logiki albo że nic nie jest jasne. To smutne jak bardzo ludzie odzwyczaili się od prawdziwego Kina.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

9

shoulderoforionMay 19, 2016

Dug it, dug it, dug it, a movie so subtle I could see how it would bore a lot of people, I found it funny & charming. Big fan of the Coen Brothers but didn't like their last golden age Hollywood flick Barton Fink, at all, this was nothingDug it, dug it, dug it, a movie so subtle I could see how it would bore a lot of people, I found it funny & charming. Big fan of the Coen Brothers but didn't like their last golden age Hollywood flick Barton Fink, at all, this was nothing like that, and if you're in the mood for something light it's a great watch.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

7

badgerryan19May 19, 2017

Stupid funny comedy. Bust out laughing at some points. Great acting, intriguing story. Another great film from the Coen brothers. Not for everyone but still a good one.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

kathytreeceApr 8, 2017

Love the Coen Brothers' humor. Enjoyable performances by Brolin and Clooney. Enjoyed performances by Swinton and Ehrenreich. Watched this on Netflix Instant.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

jg63Feb 14, 2016

Great production numbers and cinematography, but the plot is very thin. Clooney is wasted, so is Johansson. Then again, so was Tatum. All are great talents who could have been used much more effectively with a deeper plot. Brolin wasGreat production numbers and cinematography, but the plot is very thin. Clooney is wasted, so is Johansson. Then again, so was Tatum. All are great talents who could have been used much more effectively with a deeper plot. Brolin was great. Great pieces looking for a great movie to be in.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MovieInsiderFeb 22, 2016

Wow just...WOW. This amazing film by Ethan & Joel Coen was a piece of movie literature. A historical fiction film of movie studio named CAPITAL STUDIO. this studio is ran by Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) a stern family man...well at least whenWow just...WOW. This amazing film by Ethan & Joel Coen was a piece of movie literature. A historical fiction film of movie studio named CAPITAL STUDIO. this studio is ran by Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) a stern family man...well at least when he's at home. Josh Brolin's character has to deal with the mysterious disappearance of Baird Whitlock (George Clooney), AND at the same time he deals with all the actors, editing, stages, and angry directors. Although if you wanted to se a specific actor such as Scarlett Johansson or especially Jonah Hill and Ralph Fiennes. you are unfortunately out of luck.If you want to see a real picture, see this movie. But if your into action and adventure, some of this may come to your liking, but don't over pay for tickets… Expand

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

8

BenedictusMar 1, 2016

I really, really enjoy Coen brother films but I was near to ambivalent about watching this one due to the mixed reviews - and some statements to the tone of it not being like the other Coen brother films. Both me and my partner found a lot ofI really, really enjoy Coen brother films but I was near to ambivalent about watching this one due to the mixed reviews - and some statements to the tone of it not being like the other Coen brother films. Both me and my partner found a lot of the scenes laugh-out-loud funny and really enjoyed high quality charismatic performances from great actors. It's visually beautiful as well and, I think, a film with great heart, like all Coen brother films.… Expand

0 of 8 users found this helpful08

All this user's reviews

7

themovieguy123Mar 9, 2016

I don't get the message of the movie, at first i thought it was something to do Communism but i still have no clue. The trailer led me to think there was a lot of humor in this movie and they were not lying but its not humor i got but i foundI don't get the message of the movie, at first i thought it was something to do Communism but i still have no clue. The trailer led me to think there was a lot of humor in this movie and they were not lying but its not humor i got but i found that the elderly in my cinema enjoyed in very much. Don't get me wrong i laughed a couple of times. Overall i found this movie is nothing compared to other Coen Brothers films.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

mrtickleMar 7, 2016

Hail, Caesar! has a dry, deadpan humour to it that is like all Coen brothers films. And like many other Coen brothers films it has a surreal and abstract quality to it too. The story and theme is not clear at first, but it is a film to makeHail, Caesar! has a dry, deadpan humour to it that is like all Coen brothers films. And like many other Coen brothers films it has a surreal and abstract quality to it too. The story and theme is not clear at first, but it is a film to make you think, and once you realise what the film is about (hint: faith and the role you play in life) Hail, Caesar! becomes a film that is both a lover letter to 50's Hollywood and a deeper look at how a man trying to chose between taking a job that is easy but boring, or a job that is hard, muddled yet far more interesting.… Expand

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

7

al_dszMar 12, 2016

This is not the best Coen Bros film, but still a good one to watch. The cinematography in the film is brilliant and the set pieces and look and feel of 1950s Hollywood is brilliantly captured. However the let down is the plot, there isn'tThis is not the best Coen Bros film, but still a good one to watch. The cinematography in the film is brilliant and the set pieces and look and feel of 1950s Hollywood is brilliantly captured. However the let down is the plot, there isn't much to it and the 'payoff' at the end seems quite insubstantial for the plot build-up. There is also one subplot (out of a few) that seemed a bit pointless and didn't really add much to the main storyline.

The film has a lot of silly and funnily penned characters though and good performances by all the actors. It's a shame that the storyline and writing didn't do these characters and the overall film much justice.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

7

lucbevibrasilApr 24, 2016

There is a spectacular film, but it's a good movie. Not to laugh. If you expect to laugh, do not see this movie. If see, wait time to Johansson and Ehrenreich. Oh, if you see because of Clooney, you do not see at all.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

tv12May 10, 2016

Underrated movie, Lots of very clever scenes and a good send-up of old Hollywood.Too bad it slipped under the radar. The Coen Brother always deliver intelligent films.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

alejandro970Nov 26, 2017

Brothers Coen reproduce with ingenuity the tinsel of the golden age of cinema in the 50s; all this and the double moral and hypocresy of the producers and society. The fat cats of the cast makes a remarkable job, even Roger Deakins behind the camera.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

SomePersonaJan 27, 2017

A seemingly light and harmless movie with serious dark undertones beneath its overplayed charm. The movie has a panicked tone as high stunts in choreography, production design, score, and acting are brought onto the last remaining films ofA seemingly light and harmless movie with serious dark undertones beneath its overplayed charm. The movie has a panicked tone as high stunts in choreography, production design, score, and acting are brought onto the last remaining films of the studio system before it collapses. The movie also questions religion, economy, and opposing government ideologies.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

GreatGatsbyJan 28, 2017

Hail, Caesar! is another great film from the Coen Brothers, based on the 1940's Hollywood hijenks. The film has great star power and amazing acting throughout, with production both magical and colorful. The film's humor for the most part isHail, Caesar! is another great film from the Coen Brothers, based on the 1940's Hollywood hijenks. The film has great star power and amazing acting throughout, with production both magical and colorful. The film's humor for the most part is amusing, though some parts are dragged out a little too long, with periods of dialogue that is both dull and tiresome. The plot of the multiple areas of a "fixer" in Hollywood is both smart and well acknowledged within the film. Hail, Caesar! is a smart production with star power, and only lacking an uproarious response and satisfying ending for the numerous characters involved.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DirigiblePulpJul 29, 2016

Good fun. Full of lots of Old Hollywood homages, sly winks and nods and knowing humor. It's a movie I'm sure will be more appreciated on repeat viewings. As it is, it feels slight; not being overtly hilarious (The Big Lebowski) nor earnestlyGood fun. Full of lots of Old Hollywood homages, sly winks and nods and knowing humor. It's a movie I'm sure will be more appreciated on repeat viewings. As it is, it feels slight; not being overtly hilarious (The Big Lebowski) nor earnestly human (Raising Arizona) nor cuttingly satirical (Burn After Reading) enough to completely sell itself on its own merits.

The "Would that it were so simple" scene is an instant classic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews