Goodbye to Language 3D

Kino Lorber | Release Date: October 29, 2014

6.0	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 32 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Buy on

Stream On

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

ednunezApr 20, 2015

Jean-Luc Godard's influence in cinema is indisputable, but the line between genius and madman is thin, just as the line between art and pretentious trash. In short, "Goodbye to Language" is an unintelligible mess of a film. The onlyJean-Luc Godard's influence in cinema is indisputable, but the line between genius and madman is thin, just as the line between art and pretentious trash. In short, "Goodbye to Language" is an unintelligible mess of a film. The only innovative aspect was the 3D, which is the only thing why this is worth watching. At 72 minutes long, "Goodbye to Language" feels thrice its length.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

sebastianglzNov 17, 2014

I still can't believe this won the Jury Prize in Cannes this year. The story loses because all those names and quotes, the history lessons, the changing scenes and the annoying sounds. I've never been so bored in a movie.

6 of 7 users found this helpful61

All this user's reviews

bliss_sNov 25, 2014

In the end I felt as if 70 minutes of my life had been stolen... not to mention nauseous from the unbelievably bad 3D cinematography and editing. How could it have won an award? This film was a mishmash of Hitler, nudity, and too many overlyIn the end I felt as if 70 minutes of my life had been stolen... not to mention nauseous from the unbelievably bad 3D cinematography and editing. How could it have won an award? This film was a mishmash of Hitler, nudity, and too many overly long scenes of an ugly man sitting on a toilet. There was no discernible plot, no character development... The best thing about the film was the home movie of Godard's dog and even that had been spoiled by over saturated colors and poorly applied 3D. Apparently this movie is the swan song of an over-the- hill director and his cadre of sycophants that seem to believe if you make it painful enough to watch it must be "art".… Expand

8 of 10 users found this helpful82

All this user's reviews

rupertchappelleApr 21, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Worst. 3D Movie. Ever.

Quite possibly the worst French film I have ever seen and I have seen
quite a few, An SNL parody would have been better. This is the kind of
movie that makes Ed Wood seem an Orson Welles by comparison. I am
perplexed that the AFI would include this in a 3D movie festival but
apparently the name Godard counts for something,.

Best line - "the dog looks depressed," No kidding.

Everything about this movie shows contempt for whoever watches it. The
3D is a textbook example of things one should never do with 3D, too
close and too far and too jerky with parallax shifts for no apparent
reason and for some reason intentionally shifts the parallax from left
right to up down while rotating the image. The audio has intentionally
annoying cuts and gaps adding to a sense of discontinuity that needed
no help what so ever.

Literally, the best part of the movie was the frequent pooping.

Notable, Fritz Lang's Metropolis appears on the TV screen in the room
where the man and woman do their best to hone ennui to a dull edge
while Rotwang and Maria add some gravitas that goes nowhere.

MERDE!

BTW - I shoot 3D.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews