Universal Pictures | Release Date: November 21, 1931
8.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 66 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
59
Mixed:
6
Negative:
1
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
kyle20ellisMar 14, 2022
There have been complaints that Frankenstein is dated. Personally I don't find that, it isn't the most sumptuous of all films, but it is still a wonderful film, that is still shocking and enthralling to me. The Gothic set design is veryThere have been complaints that Frankenstein is dated. Personally I don't find that, it isn't the most sumptuous of all films, but it is still a wonderful film, that is still shocking and enthralling to me. The Gothic set design is very imaginative, helped by the beautiful cinematography with suitably bizarre camera angles, and the music score is haunting, melancholy and atmospheric. James Whale's direction is also very impressive, it is very focused and innovative. The story is without a doubt a classic, tense, moody and melancholic, and the Monster itself is just a masterful creation. The cast are superb, Colin Clive is very good as the eccentric Henry Frankenstein, while Mae Clarke is an alluring and sympathetic Elizabeth. There is no doubt in my mind though that Boris Karloff gave the best performance, not only that but the definitive portrayal of the monster. He is almost unrecognisable and scary with his make up, and while he was scary with the towering presence and the frightening look in his eyes, his monster is also somewhat touching, particularly when he reaches up to grasp a ray of sunlight. Overall, shocking, enthralling and just wonderful. "It's Alive!" 10/10 Bethany Cox Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
PanchogulJun 8, 2020
Es un buen clásico, de eso no hay duda, pero en mi opinión está lejos de ser tan espectacular como muchos la consideran.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
imthenoobFeb 21, 2020
I don't necessarily think it's a bad movie, I just had a hard time getting into it. I thought the pacing was slow. It felt like there were parts of the movie just skipped over due to the odd fade to black moments throughout. It doesn't age asI don't necessarily think it's a bad movie, I just had a hard time getting into it. I thought the pacing was slow. It felt like there were parts of the movie just skipped over due to the odd fade to black moments throughout. It doesn't age as well as you would hope it would, at least in comparison to other universal monster movies. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
wadisplaceJun 15, 2019
This is a classic movie that you never gets old.
This made Boris Karloff horror icon!
This is a movie that the whole family can watch. It might be too intense for younger children.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ComandanteCobraNov 3, 2022
I watched it this Halloween season (2022)...and it's still a good movie.
Short, beautiful black and white glory, a classic.
Better than Dracula in my opinion
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
alejandro970Nov 17, 2019
At side of Nosferatu and Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde, a pioneer of terror genre. The screenplay isn't quite faithful to Mary Shelley book, but you can forgive due the detail of who is the monster: the creature or the creator. Despite it's 90 yearsAt side of Nosferatu and Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde, a pioneer of terror genre. The screenplay isn't quite faithful to Mary Shelley book, but you can forgive due the detail of who is the monster: the creature or the creator. Despite it's 90 years old, still is ghastly due the presence of Boris Karloff. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FilipeNetoNov 15, 2020
Some films are more valuable for the inheritance they leave. This film, one of the most classic among the classics of horror cinema, is one such case. I don't know if it's really worth summarizing the script because almost everyone, evenSome films are more valuable for the inheritance they leave. This film, one of the most classic among the classics of horror cinema, is one such case. I don't know if it's really worth summarizing the script because almost everyone, even those who haven't read the novel, knows the story of Victor Frankenstein, a notable doctor and scientist who lets himself be obsessed with the idea of creating life by his own hands and using electricity to give life to a being made up of pieces of several human bodies. The film fails to recreate the controversial and morally challenging story, written by Mary Shelley in the midst of a snowstorm in Switzerland, and makes very little use of the original material. But it has the merit of bringing to life one of the most popular and revisited creatures in horror cinema for cinema, and of giving us the impeccable work of one of the actors who most competently brought her to the screen: Boris Karloff.

Karloff was an anonymous actor before this film and I doubt if he was aware of the impact and the strength he was going to have. After all, Bela Lugosi himself, who was the great horror actor at the time thanks to the way he had given life to Count Dracula (another monstrous character with whom the Frankenstein Monster will meet many times, in several films), had ended to refuse the role of the monster! Karloff does the work of a lifetime in this film, and jumps into immortality. He is so striking that the following actors who brought the Monster to life basically limited themselves to copying the actor's work, manners and physical appearance. And all of this, be amazed, without saying virtually a syllable! The entire remaining cast was overshadowed, including Colin Clive, who played Dr. Frankenstein.

The film is also a pearl when it comes to technical aspects, although it is not brilliant or particularly well done. The landscapes are outlined, all the scenarios are summed up to the essential, occasionally covered with artificial dust, visibly false spider webs and other resources that are basic to us, but were good at the time. Black-and-white cinematography works well and looks elegant, and the work of make-up (of the Monster, of course) and costume fulfills its role with pride and distinction.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
codyzSep 3, 2023
This movie is the classic game changing horror film. Compelling and well performed throughout. I liked the Expressionistic set design, the iconic monster makeup, and the now iconic creation sequence, and the fiery windmill scene.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews