New Line Cinema | Release Date: April 20, 2007
8.4
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 363 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
301
Mixed:
43
Negative:
19
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
JimG.Jun 2, 2007
Plenty of other better movies to go see. Not even something you need to catch on DVD. Unless you've already watched every good movie available, don't waste your time with this. It reminded me a lot of the director's much Plenty of other better movies to go see. Not even something you need to catch on DVD. Unless you've already watched every good movie available, don't waste your time with this. It reminded me a lot of the director's much better film, "Primal Fear," but it never came close to reaching that film's genius. I think that Anthony Hopkins needs to stop playing roles that are so similar to Hannibal Lecter before that's the only type of part he is offered. Or maybe it already is. It seems as though he tried to make his character more interesting (did anyone else notice the very subtle accent?) but what the character needed was to be WRITTEN more interesting. I never understood just exactly what his character did for a living. We were given a basic idea, but I think more of an exploration into his mind would've allowed for a better film. His ball bearing devices that litter his office and home suggest a much more interesting man. Gosling is great, and this was the first film I've seen him in. This is merely a stepping stone for him to better films. I wish I could say I saw all the twists coming, but I didn't. I've never been good at predicting what's going to happen before it happens unless it's blatantly obvious. But it doesn't matter, because when the answers were revealed, they were completely uninteresting. Boring film. Don't waste your time on it. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
6
TokyochuchuDec 1, 2013
Fracture is a fine lawyer criminal face-off between Ryan Gosling and Hannibal Lecter... Oh, I mean Anthony Hopkins. No, wait. I mean Hannibal Lecter. Quite why Hopkins thinks he can just play Lecter in a different film with a different nameFracture is a fine lawyer criminal face-off between Ryan Gosling and Hannibal Lecter... Oh, I mean Anthony Hopkins. No, wait. I mean Hannibal Lecter. Quite why Hopkins thinks he can just play Lecter in a different film with a different name and no-one will notice is a bit disconcerting, but the movie is still a good bit of fun. Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
6
moviegrabbagJun 12, 2011
This was a very well done movie. The acting was incredibly solid and the story was very well written. The only issue that I had with this movie was that it became a little slow in some spots. This is definitely a movie that court roomThis was a very well done movie. The acting was incredibly solid and the story was very well written. The only issue that I had with this movie was that it became a little slow in some spots. This is definitely a movie that court room thriller fans need to check out as well as fans of Anthony Hopkins because he was amazing in this movie. Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
6
beingryanjudeAug 29, 2014
Amidst the hay-days of the murder mystery genre, Fracture is refreshing. Anthony Hopkins may lean on Hannibal Lector for influence but he and Ryan Gosling are a surprisingly great match.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
5
MovieMasterEddyApr 3, 2016
In 'Fracture,' shameless conviction.

A movie about shamelessness should be shameless itself. And for five minutes here and there, ‘‘Fracture’’ does a passable job. In fact, Anthony Hopkins, who plays a genius structural engineer who shoots
In 'Fracture,' shameless conviction.

A movie about shamelessness should be shameless itself. And for five minutes here and there, ‘‘Fracture’’ does a passable job. In fact, Anthony Hopkins, who plays a genius structural engineer who shoots his wife and then represents himself at the trial, has rarely demonstrated less shame than he does in this preposterous courtroom thriller. Nor has Ryan Gosling. Although at about a third of Hopkins’s age, he has decades to top his oily performance as opposing counsel.

The film is neither a whodunit nor a whydunit. We know both. Hopkins’s character, Ted Crawford, pulls the trigger because his wife (Embeth Davidtz) has been having an affair. Not long after the shooting, a detective (Billy Burke) arrives at the Crawfords’ great big Southern California home, and to his shock discovers that the woman on the floor is the very one he’d been seeing. Ted goes to jail, willingly confesses, and relishes the fact that Gosling’s district attorney, Willy Beachum (what a name), will try to put him away.

Willy is the movie’s favorite kind of lawyer: hotshot. This one is about to move on to bigger things — a fancy new job at a corporate firm, where he can work alongside the icy dame (Rosamund Pike) who recruited and bedded him. But his 97 percent conviction rate and Ted’s obvious gamesmanship (that the wife’s lover took Ted’s confession nullifies Willy’s entire case) compel him to find a new angle to prosecute. Ted chooses to be his own defense attorney, claiming he knows nothing about the law. But he’s obviously better at it than Willy. Fiona Shaw plays the presiding judge, and she looks rightly confused and exasperated.

The movie seems so content to be smarter than you’re expecting that it never amounts to more than a talky tease. What’s breezy about the first half of the picture turns logy in the second. The entire film is hung on a shrugging legal plot twist that, years ago, managed to inspire a whole Ashley Judd vehicle. And since Hopkins is far too likable as a would-be cold-blooded murderer (whose wife, mind you, remains in a coma) the movie has to settle for a humane ending that also feels like a shrug.

‘‘Fracture’’ was written by Daniel Pyne and Glenn Gers and directed by Gregory Hoblit, whose last legal thriller, ‘‘Primal Fear,’’ was more enjoyably hokey. The new movie isn’t stupid, however. The screenplay has its share of fun, snappy dialogue, and there’s no shortage of good actors to deliver it, from Shaw and Pike, to David Strathairn, as Willy’s boss, Cliff Curtis, as a detective, and Bob Gunton, as Pike’s father.

Then there’s Gosling and Sir Anthony slinging ham at each other. They spend their scenes crossing accents. Gosling’s has a backwoods lilt that evokes possums, beer cozies, and spritzes of cheap cologne. Hopkins might be using his native Welsh brogue. Who can say, since to me he doesn’t ever sound the same way twice?

In any case, you needn’t actually see ‘‘Fracture’’ to know that if the charge is acting that winks, these two are guilty.
Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
6
amheretojudgeSep 17, 2018
never less than a "check"..

Fracture Fracture is a plot driven courtroom drama among a lawyer at its prime prosecuting an already confessed guilty who now is defending his case with no whatsoever experience. It is surprisingly hilarious with
never less than a "check"..

Fracture Fracture is a plot driven courtroom drama among a lawyer at its prime prosecuting an already confessed guilty who now is defending his case with no whatsoever experience. It is surprisingly hilarious with much more mature humor installed in with suave note that it never seems forced and cheeky. The narration is fast paced with tightly packed screenplay that is gripping if not layered and thoroughly entertaining for its runtime. Amidst all these highly pitched dramatic sequences it fails to draw out the emotions especially concerning the relations and chemistry since the frustration and the irritation described and portrayed for the protagonist communicates clearly. The background score is exhilarating if not scored extraordinarily and along with decent cinematography and fine editing, the boat floats safely on technical aspects. Gosling is vulnerable but still resists it on each frame against the master Hopkins whose reputation is justified in here with a cunning script and slick chess moves that were never less than a "check". The script aces on enfolding newer territories and bold turns and choices that it makes which is not only to bedazzle the viewers but also justifies it considering each perspective. Hoblit's execution might be decent and palpable to its tone but what stands out in here, is the world created by him that feeds itself on nothing but nature and that is something which doesn't come often. The only thing that itches throughout the course is the procedure through which the makers either rush up or skips few beats. The gripping screenplay, the enthralling high stakes through which it conveys its subject and Gosling's stellar performances are the high points of the feature. Fracture not only breaks but shatters expectations that results into never wearing off euphoric energy for the viewers, actors and makers.
Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
4
FilipeNetoJun 26, 2019
Good, but still could improve.

In this "court movie" we have the simple situation of a vain lawyer, accustomed to winning cases, who is faced with the difficult task of proving that a powerful businessman killed his wife. Cold and
Good, but still could improve.

In this "court movie" we have the simple situation of a vain lawyer, accustomed to winning cases, who is faced with the difficult task of proving that a powerful businessman killed his wife. Cold and thoughtful, he manages to anticipate every step of the prosecution lawyer and is determined to seize every asset to confuse and shuffle him. To make matters even more complicated, the prosecution lawyer is in the process of being hired to work in a large and important business law firm, and hiring largely depends on his performance in this case.

I have little to say about the script ... the story seems to me well built and developed, and the twists that happen are, in fact, what keeps people stuck in the film. However, it is not very credible, it could be even better and there are some loose ends that can bother you. Plus, it's a bit predictable. Ryan Gosling is convincing in his character. Together with veteran Anthony Hopkins, who gave life to the villain, dominates the film, and how the two characters interact and provoke help greatly to maintain the interest of the public. We really want to know which of the two will come out on top. The remaining cast is limited to the space that the two protagonists leave free. I would particularly highlight the good contribution of Fiona Shaw. Rosamund Pike, meanwhile, despite being like a fish in the water on yet another ice cold character, seems to be left in the film. Technically, the film has quality as well. Good camera game, nice color and light, a regular soundtrack but it does what it needs to do.

Overall, this movie does what it claims to do, but it can not do enough to exceed what it is regular and become truly good.
Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
6
TonyB.Oct 8, 2007
Extremely well-acted legal thriller with some unfortunate plot holes. Ryan Gosling more than holds his own up against one of our finest actors, Anthony Hopkins.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
RandyP.Apr 21, 2007
Sadly, an audience that pays more attention to the film than Willy does to his case, is made to wait for a transparent gimmick to completely unfold. What texture is present does not stick to the two dimensional characters built out of Sadly, an audience that pays more attention to the film than Willy does to his case, is made to wait for a transparent gimmick to completely unfold. What texture is present does not stick to the two dimensional characters built out of Hollywood gloss. It's perhaps an interesting diversion, but hardly satisfying. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
RafaelP.Aug 22, 2007
Just wanted to say, Cindy N. you need to learn how not to spoil the movie for other people. Revealing key plot twists is inconsiderate and rude. Please learn how not to ruin it for other people, just for the sake of trying to look smart.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
FrankH.Sep 24, 2007
Generally as an attorney I am able to appreciate literary license and understand that a film can not 100% reflect the realities of the law. But I do expect some basis in reality. The legal errors were so glaring that I was unable to enjoy Generally as an attorney I am able to appreciate literary license and understand that a film can not 100% reflect the realities of the law. But I do expect some basis in reality. The legal errors were so glaring that I was unable to enjoy the movie. Just because a defendant waives a preliminary hearing doesn't mean that the trial is going to start the next day. When a defendant files a motion the prosecution has an opportunity to respond, in writing. Judges don't make rulings in chambers, etc. My guess that a police investigator who saw this movie would have their own complaints about police procedure. That being said, Hopkins is still an interesting actor. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JoeT.Apr 22, 2007
Terrific acting that is more than the script deserves. Had me entertained for the most part, with the exception of a few stretches where the self-conscious lighting and intrusive score were not enough to distract me from some painfullly Terrific acting that is more than the script deserves. Had me entertained for the most part, with the exception of a few stretches where the self-conscious lighting and intrusive score were not enough to distract me from some painfullly obvious storytelling and plot holes. "Plot Twist #1" is apparent from early on, and "Plot Twist #2" (a.k.a. the ending) is so ludicrously unbelievable that it left me feeling cheated. It asks the audience to believe that a character who has been established as a cunning, evil genius would overlook something that would be evident to a sixth-grader. A shame, because some of the dialogue was actually quite smart. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
BillyS.Apr 23, 2007
Nothing more than a good episode of Columbo. Anthony Hopkins is always worth the price of admission, but in Fracture he is not Marlon Brando reprising his Godfather role in The Freshman. He's just a highly intelligent murderer but no Nothing more than a good episode of Columbo. Anthony Hopkins is always worth the price of admission, but in Fracture he is not Marlon Brando reprising his Godfather role in The Freshman. He's just a highly intelligent murderer but no way as diabolical as Hannibal Lector though he gets about the same screen time as he did in Lambs. Ryan Gosling proves he's an actor with more Oscar nominations in store and with Gordon Joesph Levitt are the two great actors of their generation. Fractured is really just a good court-room drama with a couple of all too transparent twists that is able to hold your attention only by the two leads. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
MattBApr 28, 2007
Good movie, definitely worth seeing, but nothing terribly special or groundbreaking. Simply entertaining and interesting.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
CindyN.Jun 12, 2007
Plot was somewhat contrived, but it did hold your interest. Satisfying ending at least. Seems in real life people choose to kill their spouses rather than that ugly word Divorce. Good acting on all the stars part.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
JFJun 23, 2007
Decent acting by most of the cast, but Gosling was horribly miscast. That error threw the entire movie off, although the final 15 minutes saved it from being a complete flop.
0 of 0 users found this helpful