United Artists | Release Date: June 26, 1981
6.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 67 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
38
Mixed:
22
Negative:
7
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
7
gracjanskiSep 21, 2021
One of the better parts of the Bond franchise in my view, especially because the villain was not so clear and therefore you need to think. Also I noticed some very good stunt scenes on the skis for example. But some action scenes wereOne of the better parts of the Bond franchise in my view, especially because the villain was not so clear and therefore you need to think. Also I noticed some very good stunt scenes on the skis for example. But some action scenes were ridiculously unrealistic again. I liked also, that this Bond was harder and ruthless.
Problems: Roger Moore is to old to imagine, he could do all these action scenes. Also the character of Bib Dahl was boring and the actress also. Carole Bouquet as Melina was very cold and without charisma, so boring, but her acting was not bad.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
kyle20ellisMar 27, 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is not the best of the Roger Moore Bonds(The Spy Who Loved Me) but it isn't the worst(a tie between **** and A View to a Kill) either- it is a film with its pros and cons and as an entry in the Bond franchise it is
Warning: Spoilers
This is not the best of the Roger Moore Bonds(The Spy Who Loved Me) but it isn't the worst(a tie between **** and A View to a Kill) either- it is a film with its pros and cons and as an entry in the Bond franchise it is actually pretty solid.

CONS: There is nothing new really in the plot, there is little really of surprises. Also some of the humour came across as rather goofy and misjudged while Bill Conti's score is rather disappointing in the forgettable sense.(the theme song was pretty good though)

PROS: The set pieces are truly spectacular, even if the gadgetry and stuff is toned down here, while the cinematography and scenery are excellent. The direction and parts of the script are solid too and the pacing is fairly brisk, while I had little to criticise the acting. Roger Moore shows more grit than usual while Carole Bouquet is very classy as Melina. John Glover is suitably subdued, while there is a colourful turn from Topol and it was a surprise to see Chales Dance as a killer.

In conclusion, not great but solid enough. 7/10 Bethany Cox.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
NBFCJan 9, 2018
After the fantastical gadgets and space spectacle of Moonraker, FYEO goes for a much more gritty and back-to-basics approach in the vein of From Russia with Love where the plot is about Bond and the villains chasing after a MacGuffin.

Moore
After the fantastical gadgets and space spectacle of Moonraker, FYEO goes for a much more gritty and back-to-basics approach in the vein of From Russia with Love where the plot is about Bond and the villains chasing after a MacGuffin.

Moore was always great with the comedy, but I feel he tends to be underrated in terms of how versatile he can be. Moore more than delivers the darker and edgy gravitas, especially during the scene where Bond avenges the death of a friend by kicking a car down the cliff with the assassin still inside.

Where the film may lack in gadgets, it more than makes up for in action. There is a great car chase in a very non-typical Bond vehicle, a ski chase, an intense underwater brawl and a heart-stopping sequence where Bond tries to climb the side of a tall cliff.

Now…even though I said this movie is more “serious”, some camp still remains like the hilarious scene where Bond fights a hockey team. I also really like the funky score provided by Bill Conti (Rocky, The Right Stuff).
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Gamepro3093Aug 19, 2020
It was cool seeing Roger Moore play a harder edged Bond and the emphasis on real spy tactics as opposed to gadgets and gimmicks. The typical Roger Moore humor is still here but significantly toned down. The action scenes are amazing and theIt was cool seeing Roger Moore play a harder edged Bond and the emphasis on real spy tactics as opposed to gadgets and gimmicks. The typical Roger Moore humor is still here but significantly toned down. The action scenes are amazing and the climax is tense. Worth the watcg. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MrPajamasFeb 17, 2021
For Your Eyes Only was a little better than Moonraker. Location great with a great plot, but mainly ... especially the jingle. The music in this Bond is one of the best in the series for me. For me, a good film that I can recommend.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
511andahalfFeb 7, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The darker tone in this movie works well after the really cheesy and silly Moonraker. There are some good action scenes in this movie, like the ski chase and cliff climbing scenes, as well as the underwater scenes. The movie feels really grounded and that's exactly what makes it work. Kristatos is a weak villain though, he really wasn't that intimidating. Overall, I think this is one of the better Moore 007 films. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
liamexeNov 27, 2022
What a fantastic time Bond movie this is! The film is filled with car chases, gorgeous women, underwater scenes, and chases in the snow once more. Or to put it another way, a Bond movie. But that is also this film's only flaw—it isn'tWhat a fantastic time Bond movie this is! The film is filled with car chases, gorgeous women, underwater scenes, and chases in the snow once more. Or to put it another way, a Bond movie. But that is also this film's only flaw—it isn't sufficiently unique or unique. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews