Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Fast Food Nation

9

IamheA.Nov 27, 2006

This film makes "Supersize Me" look like the lightweight it truly is. From the opening sequence it is clear that the fast food health issues visible to most consumers are just the tip of the iceberg lettuce, as the camera shows us cattle This film makes "Supersize Me" look like the lightweight it truly is. From the opening sequence it is clear that the fast food health issues visible to most consumers are just the tip of the iceberg lettuce, as the camera shows us cattle herds that threaten the ecology and public health, exploited undocumented workers losing their limbs and sexual autonomy in sped-up, infected slaughterhouses, and cynical corporate officials who find a way to cover it up and make it all pay. Certainly director Linklater owes a great debt to John Sayles' film "Lone Star," as well as to Stephen Frears' "Dirty Pretty Things," inasmuch as he has shown the interweaving of lives at multiple levels of the de facto race, class, nationality and corporate hierarchies, and yet has nonetheless managed to give his characters the depth and respect they deserve instead of representing them as cardboard stereotypes a la the film "Crash." The message of this film is that unaccountable corporate hierarchies must not be entrusted with decisions that affect the conditions of labor, justice and public health for entire communities of people. If you don't like that message then you are drinking the Kool-Aid that is killing the organic, cooperative systems that underlie everything that works in this world.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

1

JordanD.Nov 19, 2006

I don't think I've ever seen a more jaded piece of garbage in my short life. Written as if by a would-be activist who considers himself very clever for managing to address every single contemporary crisis in American society; from I don't think I've ever seen a more jaded piece of garbage in my short life. Written as if by a would-be activist who considers himself very clever for managing to address every single contemporary crisis in American society; from immigration, to figuring out what to do with our life, to corrupt organizations, to animal rights, and of course the global environmental crisis. The film became so convoluted with attempted themes that none of theme seemed to matter in the least. They were badly addressed, on-the-nose and didactic, failing to bring any real understanding or insight to any of the causes that were so obviously far from the filmmaker's hearts. Makes me want a hamburger.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

JasonW.Nov 19, 2006

Possibly one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It is bad on two levels: the first is that the movie does not deliver its message well, and the second is that its message is bad.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

2

EricY.Mar 19, 2007

I thought it would never end... How boring. I was entertained for a while, but got tired of the movie. Don't waste your time.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

MarkBayerDec 13, 2006

Richard Linklater's misshapen interpretation of Eric Schlosser's rigorously researched best seller that blows the whistle on Ronald McDonald and his ilk may not be the worst movie of the year per se (Poseidon, The Black Dahlia, Richard Linklater's misshapen interpretation of Eric Schlosser's rigorously researched best seller that blows the whistle on Ronald McDonald and his ilk may not be the worst movie of the year per se (Poseidon, The Black Dahlia, Lady in the Water, The Sentinel and You, Me and Dupree just put up too tough a race), but if there were a special designation for 2006's most ineffective film, this would win it in a walk. The wildly prolific and uneven Linklater, who in the last four years brought us the lovely, sublime Before Sunset, the visually striking A Scanner Darkly, the solidly entertaining School of Rock and the totally unnecessary Bad News Bears remake, makes (with not only Schlosser's blessing but also his co-participation) a fatal mistake that dooms it from square one: instead of molding Schlosser's material into the powerful documentary it should've been, Linklater turns it into a ponderous, lumpy, frequently inept and painfully dull work of fiction! It's a tragic shame, because Schlosser's work eviscerates not only the fast food industry but the culture that allows and encourages it to thrive in so many different ways that it cries out for a Michael Moore, Robert Greenwald or Errol Morris to do it justice. In doing so it would almost surely have been a far more effective indictment than Morgan Spurlock's overrated Super Size Me, which suffered from too many specious or dishonest arguments (let's face it, you can get a hair in your burger at any restaurant in town, not just McDonald's) but an idiotic premise and "hook" (anybody who's stupid enough to eat nothing but Golden Arches food for a month when there are affordable alternatives is of course not only guaranteed to get sick but almost deserves to!) To Schlosser's credit (and admittedly Linklater's) he asks us to look at our dining choices altruistically rather than merely out of a selfish concern for our health; while he has much to say about the impure elements that make it into Quarter Pounders in the factory (and that also occasionally make it ONTO them in the restaurant as well, depending on just how disgruntled your local servers happen to be) he also arouses our compassion and concern for the inhumane treatment both of the cattle that are used and of the immigrant labor who are more or less treated LIKE cattle. Linklater makes the miscalculation of, rather than SHOWING us much of this, having various guest actors mostly look at the camera and TELL us about it; he saves the gut-wrenching visuals until nearly the end, but given just how surprisingly wooden and amateurish most of his capable cast is here (except Maria Full of Grace's Catalina Sandino Moreno, who has some heartwrenching wordless moments) it's doubtful that much of the audience will be awake at that point to watch. (For all its faults, Super Size Me certainly wasn't boring!) Schlosser's book is this generation's parallel to Upton Sinclair's 1906 expose of meat-packing practices in urban Chicago, The Jungle; Sinclair always regretted that, for all the changes his book and its uproar forced upon the industry, that the public didn't see the bigger picture Sinclair intended and embrace socialism (or at least reform the more heartless aspects of capitalism). Any movie in which a group of high school kids (including a fast food employee) engage in an endless scene of agitprop chatter unpleasantly reminiscent of the worst campus-protest movie of 1971 before deciding to stick it to The Man by freeing a herd of cattle, and the main audience response elicited isn't solidarity or even sympathy with their cause but rather irritation at their naivete in wondering why Bessie and Elsie stay right where they are and DON'T make a break for it isn't going to come anywhere near achieving either Sinclair's or Schlosser's greater or lesser aims. In fact, it's emblematic of Fast Food Nation's total failure in communicating its arguments that less than 48 hours after seeing it, I bought and ate a Big Mac and fries...and the irony didn't even occur to me for several MORE hours!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

LanceM.Mar 20, 2007

It would've been better if this were a intelligent, comical satire, but it comes off as vegan propaganda. Plus the characters don't intermingle, and is rather a disjointed concept movie that tries to snub its nose at its own It would've been better if this were a intelligent, comical satire, but it comes off as vegan propaganda. Plus the characters don't intermingle, and is rather a disjointed concept movie that tries to snub its nose at its own viewers. Too bad, I was expecting better.… Expand