Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Warner Bros. | Release Date: November 18, 2016
7.2
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1267 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
908
Mixed:
254
Negative:
105
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
Legoguy6100Nov 29, 2016
As a huge fan of the Harry Potter movies, I was absolutely blown away by this film. From the nostalgic opening titles and classic score to the stunning visuals, this film more then exceeded the hype and expectations surrounding it, prior toAs a huge fan of the Harry Potter movies, I was absolutely blown away by this film. From the nostalgic opening titles and classic score to the stunning visuals, this film more then exceeded the hype and expectations surrounding it, prior to its release. Like every film, this one had it's problems, including recycled elements from the original Harry Potter movies. These factors include an overly abusive adoptive family (physically and mentally) as well as constant visits to an orphanage. These two factors were unnecessary- but didn't take too much time away from the mysterious marvel that was the rest of the film. A lot of things were cut out of the movie, as expected from a film from a series like this. The words "I want to be a wizard" were never said. Newt never stops in front of the police offers and says "You have absolutely nothing to worry about." The scene in which Newt stands on a roof top in daylight with two others next to him? Never shown. All complaints aside, this is one of the best movies I've seen in a while. This film was at the top of my list for most anticipated films for the year- and it didn't disappoint. This is truly a flick that will satisfy long-time fans of the Wizarding World, as well as welcome viewers to the incredible universe.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
0
isibisiNov 21, 2016
bad film, description of the characters (including evil) completely absent, more similar powers to a magneto that a potter, actors with a single expression.
3 of 16 users found this helpful313
All this user's reviews
6
dtlNov 19, 2016
A generally enjoyable film, it looks good (but not great) and the cast works well together. The story on the other hand seemed often aimless and overly bogged down. Honestly, I don't understand why this is the story they decided to go withA generally enjoyable film, it looks good (but not great) and the cast works well together. The story on the other hand seemed often aimless and overly bogged down. Honestly, I don't understand why this is the story they decided to go with when expanding the Harry Potter world. That said, the story was neither overly confusing nor overly simple, and I expect that Rowling could do a good job in future scripts. The world itself seemed well put together, if a bit off-putting. Rowling doesn't seem to find much to like in her vision of American Wizardry, though I imagine in future movies we would find more nuance in that area. Additionally, I am not a fan of period pieces, and those who do may find it slightly more enjoyable.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
4
familyguyNov 19, 2016
What the hell with Eddie Redmayne? Entire a film he only have 1 boring expression. Is that how 2 times oscar nominated and 1 win acting. His performance like this film is the pain in the ass and he just want to go home soon after work hour.What the hell with Eddie Redmayne? Entire a film he only have 1 boring expression. Is that how 2 times oscar nominated and 1 win acting. His performance like this film is the pain in the ass and he just want to go home soon after work hour. Seriously they should more screen time on Colin farrel… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
6
TheMetacritiqerNov 19, 2016
It's nothing compared to the best Harry Potters. What about the not so good ones? I forget, I saw them years ago. Theirs no sense of mystery or punch to the confrontations. And it could be a little shorter. It takes way too long to end. A lotIt's nothing compared to the best Harry Potters. What about the not so good ones? I forget, I saw them years ago. Theirs no sense of mystery or punch to the confrontations. And it could be a little shorter. It takes way too long to end. A lot of it is a comedy that's not funny. Except for the platypus creature in the beginning when he's shaked and all the gold comes out his pouch. But I did actually like Katherine Waterston's character. Four more of these? Ridiculous.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
7
DirigiblePulpDec 17, 2016
There's some really good world-building in this film. America in the 1920's? Absolutely brilliant what is done with it. It feels like a very organic extension of the Harry Potter universe; like it has always been this way and we are peekingThere's some really good world-building in this film. America in the 1920's? Absolutely brilliant what is done with it. It feels like a very organic extension of the Harry Potter universe; like it has always been this way and we are peeking back in time in a fictional universe (and not like a different universe altogether, or just shameless fandom branding).

However the plot leaves a lot to be desired. The "Fantastic Beasts" wrapper doesn't wind up nearly as exciting as the world around it. It's a very basic fetch quest type story that merely serves to introduce new characters and places and things; it also serves to dumb-down and grind the interesting stuff to a halt. The action scenes aren't great -- choppy, bad CGI, mindlessness (though not the mating dance which was a real delight) -- they go on a tad too long and don't add much overall.

Rowling clearly knows what she's doing, yet for some reason resorted to a paint-by-numbers plot to get her points across. Maybe it was studio interference (albeit only for the first film, to re-introduce things in a simple way) or maybe all the good stuff is being saved for later (ugh, world-building).

Sorcerer's Stone used a fairly simple plot to build a world, yet it felt like an organic extension of what we were seeing and how it was being shaped and presented to us. Here it feels cheap, unfinished and of two disparate ideas.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
TheQuietGamerMay 5, 2017
Fantastic Beasts welcomes us back into the world of Harry Potter. This time though we aren't at Hogwarts and we are following an entirely new cast of characters, in a different time period, and a different part of the world. The movie does aFantastic Beasts welcomes us back into the world of Harry Potter. This time though we aren't at Hogwarts and we are following an entirely new cast of characters, in a different time period, and a different part of the world. The movie does a great job of expanding the scale and lore of the Rowling's universe on the big screen. Most importantly though, Fantastic Beasts brings back that sense of fun that had been missing from the movies since The Goblet of Fire. The new setting and it's unique twists on wizardry rules ensure that Fantastic Beasts is new and fresh enough to ensure that this isn't just a retread, but familiar enough to tap back into that sense of amazement and wonder we felt way back in 2001 when The Sorcerer's Stone first came out. The new cast is just as endearing as the old, only in different ways. Each new character feels distinct enough to carve new paths in our hearts. Each is excellently portrayed and written. The same can't be said for the supporting cast. They are all talented actors playing interesting characters, but the film puts most of it's intention on it's main heroes. Not a bad move, but it left me wanting just a little bit more from the side of the world.

The plot is also a sparse. The majority of it is going on in the background. Instead the majority of what we're watching is Newt and his new friends chase spectacular magical creatures. It's still entertaining, but the main conflict suffers as a result. We can clearly see who the villain is, but he doesn't get much screen time. Of course I can't complain too much about this. With so many of the later Harry Potter movies being something of a drag due to how dark things got, I appreciate this more lighthearted affair and there are still more serious things going on behind the scenes.

This new tale in Harry Potter universe feels like a fresh new start. It hearkens back to glory days of the Harry Potter movies. It stumbles a bit with it's writing and world-building, but all of that can be forgiven because Fantastic Beasts reminded me why I fell in love with these movies all those years ago. It's a brand new adventure with that recognizable magic and original feel.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
lancekozNov 25, 2016
Strange world now... such over the top incredible seamless effects, incredible hi-price cast, and people-who-really-know-stuff Art Direction... in service to such a silly, cliche-laden story that only children could love, but at the sameStrange world now... such over the top incredible seamless effects, incredible hi-price cast, and people-who-really-know-stuff Art Direction... in service to such a silly, cliche-laden story that only children could love, but at the same time, too complex and dark for children. Starts out with some light and fantastic moments, ends up about as pleasant (and loud) as a weekend in Aleppo, Syria. Oddly touches on Fascism, waterboarding, Trump... with dragons. The pre-modern visualization of New York city was wonderful. But brief.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
1
TelemanJul 22, 2017
So much pretentious dialogue, so little plot. Characters are unlikeable and unrelatable. CGI is sub videogame level in some scenes. So very unfitting for Harry Potter universe.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
evokingsMay 29, 2017
the movie was well done, but I feel there is no connection to harry potter universe, to be fair maybe a few names and spells from that universe creep in, this movie feels like it take place in the past background of the harry potter universe,the movie was well done, but I feel there is no connection to harry potter universe, to be fair maybe a few names and spells from that universe creep in, this movie feels like it take place in the past background of the harry potter universe, the movie is a bit long at bits i felt honestly like it was not explaining itself enough but it eventually explains the story to you, but the movie makes you wait for the back story to present itself, it feels vary JK Rowling-esque the movie is good, but nothing special the whole movie as a whole is a good watch.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Jim222001Jun 15, 2017
The film is magical and "Fantastic" despite being over-stuffed and draggy. The chemistry between Dan Fogler and Alison Sudol to me is what made the film truly great. Fogler who usually plays the same loud mouth in comedies, really shines hereThe film is magical and "Fantastic" despite being over-stuffed and draggy. The chemistry between Dan Fogler and Alison Sudol to me is what made the film truly great. Fogler who usually plays the same loud mouth in comedies, really shines here as a muggle dragged in the magical world. However Sudol's Queenie who can read minds probably gives the most magical performance in the movie.
Anyone whining that the film isn't exactly what they wanted, I don't understand. The film is a magical delight, what else did you expect it to be ?… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
MattBrady99Nov 25, 2016
"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" is a cute, funny, and enchanting film that I had a lot of fun with.

It doesn't cheat itself by using nostalgic or references to win you over. It manages stands on it's own feet and give us a fresh"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" is a cute, funny, and enchanting film that I had a lot of fun with.

It doesn't cheat itself by using nostalgic or references to win you over. It manages stands on it's own feet and give us a fresh look of the wizarding world. That's the biggest praise I can give to this movie, as you can watch this without any acknowledgment of the Harry Potter films and you still know what's going on. I know fans will embrace this spin-off and rightly so.

Eddie Redmayne was excellent as Newt Scamander. He's likable, engaging, and has a very distinct personality. The same goes to Dan Fogler as Jacob Kowalski who isn't the annoying sidekick that I thought he was going to be. He added a lot to this film, which is the laughter and heart to the story. Come to my surprise, his character towards the end was the most emotional part of the film.

The rest of the cast were pretty solid and I can easily see fans falling in love with the characters.

Katherine Waterston was good as Tina, who's investigating the strange things that's going on in New York City.

When I said that Fogler brought the laughter and emotion to the story - well Colin Farrell (Percival Graves) and Ezra Miller (Credence) brought the dramatic elements. Both of their scenes I found pretty intense and was more interested in that story-line.

David Yates can be a hit or miss for me. (*COUGH COUGH* "The Legend of Tarzan" *COUGH COUGH*). I did like "Order of the Phoenix" and "Deathly Hallows: Part 2". The other's on the another hand, not so much. But I can say this about Yates, he understands the universe very well and him returning to direct must feel like home to him. While the action scenes are basic and duels aren't that special, but the best part & the main focus are the characters.

My issues with the film are mostly with the effect's, editing mistakes, and the heavy exposition scenes.

I kinda wish there was more practical work with none-effect characters. Like the Goblins or Elves didn't have to be cgi and could've easily had make-up on. Because the effect's for them looked fake and pretty bad which is unfortunate to say. It really did stick out and not in a good way.

Overall rating: There's plenty of room for improvement for "Fantastic Beasts", but the flaws didn't stop me from enjoying the film. And I don't mind that there's gonna be five of these. Seriously, I don't mind at all.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
Jess_HillNov 21, 2016
This is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. TheThis is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. The performances are considered and generally polished, with Redmayne excellent as is to be expected. Definitely one for older children, this was better than I was expecting. 7.86/10… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
Xan_RyilDec 2, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Here’s what’s wrong with Fantastic Beasts…!!!!

1. Eddie Redmayne
Eddie could hold first 10 position on this list because of his worst ever portrayal of any character written by J. K Rowling. It’s a new low by an Oscar winner. Even with all the efforts by writer and director, Eddie not only failed to make audience feel infatuated with him but one can’t even relate to his character. It has something to do with his hate towards camera’s lenses or his love for his side profile that he would rather should his left cheek most of the time instead of facing the camera. His acting is pretty much unidimensional. Character shows no development or attachment to anyone besides harnessing some weird animals. 2. Rest of the cast
As much as we praised the casting director of Harry Potter for bringing such brilliant mix to our lives, audience will curse the casting director of Fantastic for the job to bring worst performers on the screen…altogether. None of the actors could really fit in the character (much thanks to J. K. Rowling’s very weak characterization). Every actor seems to be the miss fit. And wearing weird costumes and hair. Lead characters seems to miss the cohesiveness among them even they witch sisters are distant. Some characters hardly acknowledge another’s screen presence.

3. The adventure
Unlike Harry Potter and as the movie is sold, there is less or no adventure involved. Eventually the biggest threat is the exposure (which does not sound that much of a threat). There is nothing left in the action sequence when it’s known to be harmless to living being whether it’s animal or dark force which despite of revolving around the person who betrayed him does not hard him a bit ( not even his hair were messed up while Eddie’s were all messed up throughout )

4. Plotline and Characterization
Story is pretty much vague, we never know, how did the beasts escaped at the first? Here much is left to imagination or presumption that only die hard readers of the books are watching the movie. Also the intentions of characters are not clear, why Newt is taking Jacob to everywhere, only likeness is not enough, beside the movie would have still be the same without Jacob as he plays no role in whole movie at all. Same is the character of Queenie and her affection for Jacob. Some sub plots used, were only waste of budget especially Shaw’s death and his father & brother’s rage. Signing John Voight for a role which has no significance was mismanagement by studio. I personally struggled to have fun during most of the part. Story was plain straight and offered no excitement.

5. Finale
Ending is very much like any other super hero movie. Someone trying to take over and destroying building during its movement however it does not do much harm we’ll give it that ( and they can’t come up with sequel where heroes will be held responsible or be divided among themselves to take responsibility of the destruction and mass murder). Even though Tine was closer to credence (a character which should won award for the worst hair cut in history of mankind), she sends Newt to save and talk to him. Another failed effort by W Bros to create beloved hero (but with Eddie’s stupid acting or in words of Sia “Cheap Thrills” it’s impossible). Graves’ intentions about obscurus and newt are so unclear. It’s not revealed what he wanted to do with obscurus and it was annoying what he was doing with Newt in the subway. As is the fact that they have planned 4 more movies after this adventure less movie. What’s good with Fantastic Beasts?

1. Collin Farrell
Mr. Farrell is the best thing in the movie. Although his character lacks the depth and background but Collin gave persona and intensity to it. He literally owned every frame he was in. He could have been one of those series antagonists who are both evil and memorable. 2. Cameo
I was not going to write it as it would have caused “Spoiler Alert” but I cannot, not write about it. Johnny Depp’s cameo is the best cameo ever in film or television. Even that I had read about it, still I completely forgot and almost jumped out of my seat to see him. He gave us hope.

3. Future prospects
Now that Eddie is signed and played Newt, they can’t replace him but J. K. Rowling can bring Albus Dumbledore in the story and make him the lead instead. It would make the story much mature, dark and fan favorite.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
3
ImpeccableTasteJan 3, 2017
BORING! CGI is really fake looking, and story is just flat. New York looks really depressing, and dark all the time. Redmayne has become addicted to playing his characters on the autism spectrum in my opinion.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
hannah132016Dec 8, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The film is just amazing, with stunning, sets visuals and plot. My favorite character is Jacob the no-mag. Definitely worth paying the admission, it was so amazing that I was left speechless at the end. I love the fact that it has some resemblance to the Harry Potter. I loved how Newts case has lots of dimensions. My favorite beast was the Niffler, I thought it was really quite cute. However it isn't really like the Harry Potter movies, which I think is a good thing because it gives HP fans a chance to see something different by J.K Rowling, with some different actors too. I thought Eddie was the perfect choice for Newt. I loved Dan Fogler too! The film was the best film I have ever seen, I cant wait for the second film. Very developed, worth seeing, definitely entertaining from start to finish.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
VirgonoShakaDec 10, 2016
As a big Harry Potter fan in my teenage years, I wasn't sure where to stand in my expectations of this movie. I was hopeful it was going to be good, but was cautious about being too exited, mostly because Harry Potter has lost some of itsAs a big Harry Potter fan in my teenage years, I wasn't sure where to stand in my expectations of this movie. I was hopeful it was going to be good, but was cautious about being too exited, mostly because Harry Potter has lost some of its shine in this stage of my life. But to be honest, I was very pleasently surprised by this movie. It expands in one of the things I always wanted to see more in Harry Potter, the world, and it ends up being the best character of the movie, because you see that outside of Hogwarts there is more to be found and it can be very intersting, charming, and wondrous all in its own. Add to it nice designs for the creatures, excellent music, good mystery, and you have a winning start to a new movie saga. Hopefully the world, the places, and the story continues to impress in the next chapters.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MyDistUniverseDec 26, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I am the first to admit that I was sceptical about the movie Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them. How could you make a movie about the world of Harry Potter without Harry Potter? I needn't have been worried. Clearly, J.K. Rowling knows what she is doing. In a departure from the conventional first writing the story in form of a novel, she skipped a step and went on straight to writing the screenplay instead. With an incredible movie as a result.

The story is about Newt Scamander. Newt is a British wizard who comes to New York in the 1920s. In his possession he has a suitcase filled with magical creatures. He has collected those fantastic beasts all over the world and stopped over in America to release the Thunderbird into the wild to be with other creatures of its kind. After that he is on his way back home to write a book about the fantastic beasts and where to find them. Or so he thought.

A chance encounter with ‘no-maj’ Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler) leads to a mix up of their suitcases and ultimately results in some of the creatures getting out. When he meets Newt, a strange new chapter in his life starts.

Trouble brews in form of Percival Graves (Colin Farrell), a powerful wizard and the Director of Security at MACUSA. He appears to have an agenda of his own, which is not quite clear as of yet. But he does meet Credence, a teenage boy and one of Mary Lou’s adopted children in some back alleys to task him with finding a child witch who supposedly possesses unimaginable powers.

The events take the group of new friends all across New York in an effort to catch the escaped creatures and to return them to the magical world Newt has created in his suitcase for them,

The story ends in an epic show down wizard style, with grown men waving their wands like it’s no ones business. There are sparks flying and buildings crumbling.

The CGI effects throughout the movie are spectacular. I highly recommend watching the movie in 3D. The creatures and their world look incredibly real and close enough to touch. It is rather fascinating to watch a tiny little blue insect flapping its wings right in front of your nose.

The story itself is thought provoking and beautiful. It touches on the age old subject of comparing people of different backgrounds against each other. People who lead different lives and people who have different abilities. Who is right and who is wrong. Who is better and who is not. And how do they treat the creatures around them?

Similarities with today’s society is clearly visible to anyone willing to look passed the story of wizardry and transfers the values into the everyday life of the modern world.

We can all learn something from a suitcase full of magical creatures.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
manningn15Nov 21, 2018
I loved the Harry Potter franchise and this spin-off is amazing. The visual effects were spectacular. The story and plot were fantastic. The creatures were all cool, creepy, and cute. The cast gave stupendous performances especially EddieI loved the Harry Potter franchise and this spin-off is amazing. The visual effects were spectacular. The story and plot were fantastic. The creatures were all cool, creepy, and cute. The cast gave stupendous performances especially Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol, Colin Farrell, Ezra Miller, and Carmen Ejogo. The soundtrack was also great. A+.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
nateOstrikeJan 13, 2018
How did I miss this one in the cinema? It is the best Harry Potter movie of them all on my opinion. Great actors, good story, wonderful imagination and creatures and nothing crude or foul. I enjoyed this movie a lot and I really hope anotherHow did I miss this one in the cinema? It is the best Harry Potter movie of them all on my opinion. Great actors, good story, wonderful imagination and creatures and nothing crude or foul. I enjoyed this movie a lot and I really hope another one comes out with Depp in it and all the others. Well done.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
luke100Jan 11, 2018
The plot is really stupid sometimes, and the subplot of magical creatures feels a bit forced, but it's characters and themes are captivating, and the visuals keep your eyes glued to the screen. It's not perfect, but it has me hugely excitedThe plot is really stupid sometimes, and the subplot of magical creatures feels a bit forced, but it's characters and themes are captivating, and the visuals keep your eyes glued to the screen. It's not perfect, but it has me hugely excited for the sequels.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(83/100)
I very much liked this new step into another side of the Harry Potter world!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
BrearosemcmNov 8, 2020
Johnny Depp was the best thing to happen to the show and now that he’s gone I’m not gonna be able to watch it, Firing him was a big mistake.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
Kdog152Jan 3, 2023
All the magic of the Harry Potter series, but with different characters and based 50 years before the events of the philosophers stone. I love the small Easter eggs and other small details in this film as well, especially the little deathlyAll the magic of the Harry Potter series, but with different characters and based 50 years before the events of the philosophers stone. I love the small Easter eggs and other small details in this film as well, especially the little deathly hallows symbol Easter egg. Really great movie from the amazing series brought to us by the legend who is JK Rowling and whoever the producers are.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
smijatovDec 11, 2016
As a Harry Potter fan since the pre-film Harry Potter times, I was clearly extremely excited about the expansion of the magical world that I had come accustomed to explore in the film theatre. The awe-inspiring creativity and ability toAs a Harry Potter fan since the pre-film Harry Potter times, I was clearly extremely excited about the expansion of the magical world that I had come accustomed to explore in the film theatre. The awe-inspiring creativity and ability to project a completely new world onto the screen was what kept on bringing me and millions others back year after year to watch the next installment of the Harry Potter saga.
However, this is a new saga, and, unfortunately, as the reviewer from Entertainment Weekly aptly described, this one seems "numbingly inconsequential." Do not get me wrong, this is not a bad film. But it is not a *good* film either. It is just fine. And that is disappointing. I found it hard to get into the story for the first hour or so. It just did not grab my attention, despite of all the action going on. Later on, I did find myself engrossed in the film, but that was not quite enough. The darkness that the HP films went to by the end is well maintained here. The visuals are beautiful. The CGI is amazing and even a notch better than the last couple of Harry Potter films. There is nothing wrong per se. It is just lacking an emotional connection. And that may be because it is compared to Harry Potter and if we are holding the film to that standard, it never will live up to it. It just cannot. The most redeeming factor for me was the feeling that it was very appropriate to have such a bleak view of the U.S. in the wake of Donald Trump's election. While this was overall not quite as exciting nor engaging as I had hoped it would be, it did set a stage with enough unknowns about this new wizarding world of the U.S. that it will probably easily give itself to the other 4 sequels. Maybe they will develop this emotional connection that this first installment failed to achieve.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
BikerjamesMay 11, 2017
I have enjoyed Eddie Redmayne in films, but he lacks personality in this one. He has little dialogue throughout the movie, and Dan Fogler steals every scene he is in with him. Colin Farrell's bad guy Percival doesn't have enough characterI have enjoyed Eddie Redmayne in films, but he lacks personality in this one. He has little dialogue throughout the movie, and Dan Fogler steals every scene he is in with him. Colin Farrell's bad guy Percival doesn't have enough character development, and also seems a little one note. One thing you can tell the filmmakers spent a LOT of time on is the special effects, because it's a special effects extravaganza. Because of that it does give a sense of wonder and made me enjoy the film enough to recommend it. I just wish I cared about the characters more.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Lambo442Mar 24, 2022
It looks and feels like a Harry Potter film but it's slow, lacks plot and the script is bad. Too many characters, too much hapenning with no focus or cohesion. Lots of it doesn't make sense either.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
HfahmyJan 4, 2017
Absolute waste of time, no story to drive a scenario, and no scenario to drive acting. Full nonsense, as if magics movie is a permission for absurdity and out of context personalities and events. The only positive in this so called movie areAbsolute waste of time, no story to drive a scenario, and no scenario to drive acting. Full nonsense, as if magics movie is a permission for absurdity and out of context personalities and events. The only positive in this so called movie are the special effects, but that is not sufficient. If someone needs some sleep, he will be granted two hours but at a high ticket price.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TyranianApr 9, 2019
Great visuals but terrible lead character and really dumb plot ruin this film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Tss5078Nov 28, 2016
J.K. Rowling may have ended the Harry Potter series, but she isn't done writing about her magical world. Her latest series Fantastic Beasts has finally hit theaters, with the first of what will be a five film series, that starts off a hundredJ.K. Rowling may have ended the Harry Potter series, but she isn't done writing about her magical world. Her latest series Fantastic Beasts has finally hit theaters, with the first of what will be a five film series, that starts off a hundred years before Harry Potter stepped into Hogwarts. The film is centered on Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), who has come to New York City as part of his quest to save the endangered species of the magical world. These creatures live in what appears to be a suitcase, but when some of them escape and a muggle is exposed to Scamander's attempts to retrieve them, he finds himself in a world of trouble. Scamander's only salvation is that with another unknown creature and a dark wizard on the loose, there are other things to worry about, so he is sent with an agent (Katherine Waterston), and the muggle, to collect his creatures and to try to help figure out what is going on. Even though this movie takes place a hundred years before Harry Potter the special effects and especially the CGI on all the creatures involved is amazing! Even if I watched this film without the sound on, I'd still be blown away by how visually impactful it is. As for it's star, they cast one of the biggest up and comers in Hollywood, Eddie Redmayne, and he is perfect for the role. Redmayne is exactly like Harry and the kind of character Rowling loves to write about. He's this geeky, skinny, soft spoken, lovable loser, that no one would expect to be perhaps a hero in waiting. Aside from some corny jokes thrown in for the kids and die hard Potter fans, this movie was absolutely fantastic and I can't wait to see where it goes next. Rowling has stated that the other films will focus on other characters, including a younger Dumbledore, which I'm a bit indifferent to. I really liked this film, and I am curious to know what would be the point in a sequel that starts over. I'd imagine it would be to introduce everyone and then bring them all together in the end, but no matter what they do, the producers will be hard pressed to out due this film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JoeCoolFeb 25, 2017
This is a decent enough movie to go see with the kids. The critics might be right in giving it a score like Rogue One, but I definitely enjoyed this one a lot more. The setting is the fantastical "Harry Potter universe" but it doesn't compareThis is a decent enough movie to go see with the kids. The critics might be right in giving it a score like Rogue One, but I definitely enjoyed this one a lot more. The setting is the fantastical "Harry Potter universe" but it doesn't compare to any of those movies. It's not a really great movie because there certainly are times when it's a bit too slow, but it certainly has its moments and is overall decent enough to make the "go see" category IMO.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
AthanasiosTFeb 27, 2017
Some movies are made for children up to 10 years old. Clearly this is one of those. It has some nice visual effects, but apart from that, I just couldn't stay and watch it till the end.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
mrmonsterApr 17, 2017
Not a great Harry Potter movie, but defintiely worth watching if you are a fan of Harry Potter. I hope the sequel is better than this. Overall, just an okay movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Jack97Dec 16, 2016
J.K Rowling's Wizarding World is back, only this time we see a whole new side of it. Seeing the workings of the American wizarding community was fascinating and I can't wait to see more of this world expanded in future films. On top of thatJ.K Rowling's Wizarding World is back, only this time we see a whole new side of it. Seeing the workings of the American wizarding community was fascinating and I can't wait to see more of this world expanded in future films. On top of that we get an entertaining yet simple story populated by likable characters and terrific visuals. Welcome back to the Wizarding World folks!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
adrenilinmattNov 18, 2016
Fantastic movie, exactly what it needed to be. I dont know why people seem so obsessed with the darker side of this movie, as if it is a bad thing.. the universe is dark. Evil lurks around every corner of the hp universe, why would this beFantastic movie, exactly what it needed to be. I dont know why people seem so obsessed with the darker side of this movie, as if it is a bad thing.. the universe is dark. Evil lurks around every corner of the hp universe, why would this be any different? I enjoyed every second of it. The beasts truly were fantastic, and eddie was great as expected. Go see it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Compi24Oct 4, 2019
After the undoubtedly impressive, decade long, multi-director triumph that was the first eight films of the Harry Potter franchise, Warner Bros. -- in classic Hollywood studio fashion -- decided to capitalize further on the IP by goingAfter the undoubtedly impressive, decade long, multi-director triumph that was the first eight films of the Harry Potter franchise, Warner Bros. -- in classic Hollywood studio fashion -- decided to capitalize further on the IP by going backwards in both time and, well, a lot of other things too. Considering the film we have here, coupled with the fact that J.K. Rowling assumed sole scripting responsibilities this time around, it comes to no surprise that die hards have evoked the Prequels (yes, that's "Prequels" with a capital "P," as you know exactly what's being referred to) as a comparison piece. This film takes the stately and quaint priggishness out of what we all understand the Wizarding World of Harry Potter to be, and yet somehow makes it all lesser in terms of appeal? Maybe it's the lack of British accents. Or maybe it's the pedestrian nature of the world in play, considered in hand with the disjointed narrative, incomplete character work, and confounding lore. On second thought, maybe it was the British accents. All kidding aside, however, this really didn't feel like a Harry Potter movie to me. Now, that doesn't mean the whole movie is bad or otherwise unwatchable. But it is most definitely an inferior product. With the lush history, legendary world-building, and -- honestly -- more impressive effects of the previous eight films in mind, I feel as though I've already seen the light when it comes to anything involving this universe. And while that light was shaped like a proud and stolid stag, "Fantastic Beasts'" light remains in the shape of a. . .what the hell was that platypus-looking thing called again?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
LeZeeApr 14, 2017
Well, everything's in the title itself, you watch it only to confirm.

I don't want to be so negative like the film critics, but this is a big disappointment for me watching being a film fanatic. I don't think anyone who loved 'Harry Potter'Well, everything's in the title itself, you watch it only to confirm.

I don't want to be so negative like the film critics, but this is a big disappointment for me watching being a film fanatic. I don't think anyone who loved 'Harry Potter' film series would thumb this new beginning. This is not like 'The Lord of the Rings' and 'The Hobbit' from the same universe, but different trilogies. I was excited for something like that, as a concept wise, for the fresh tale from from the fresh characters in the same universe. I don't know about the book version, but the film did not click for me.

It had a bunch of nice characters, and to set in the Harry Potter universe, really it should have been a masterpiece. The major drawback was the story. There's nothing to appreciate the screenplay. It's about some creatures from the magical world got out in the human world, just like 'Jumanji'. So our hero struggles to recapture them. Meanwhile, some others too involved in and the reason will be revealed in the final stage.

Nice casting and great visuals. I won't point out its director's fault, because he has done his duty very well. He's also will be the man behind the rest of the sequels. I think it deserved the Oscars for the costume design. Not a bad film, particularly for the kids. Comparing it with the Harry Potter franchise makes it a worst film, but independently it is an okay film. So the initiation was average, but I'm still expecting the follow ups to be much better.

5/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
sanyrubApr 27, 2017
Never seen a Harry Potter film in my life. I was very skeptical about this but I love Erza Miller, Collin Farrel and Eddie Redmayne so I decided to stream this film a few months after release. I was surprisingly involved with the story andNever seen a Harry Potter film in my life. I was very skeptical about this but I love Erza Miller, Collin Farrel and Eddie Redmayne so I decided to stream this film a few months after release. I was surprisingly involved with the story and the whole look of the film. Those three actors I mentioned didn´t disappoint, and so didn´t the rest of the cast. Very charming film. Perfect for kids.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ViolettDec 11, 2018
If you are not a diehard fan of Harry Potter universe, didnt read the books, but you just like this kind of bright movies - you might like this. While the story is some sort weak as well as acting, this is a nice one-time-see movie for anIf you are not a diehard fan of Harry Potter universe, didnt read the books, but you just like this kind of bright movies - you might like this. While the story is some sort weak as well as acting, this is a nice one-time-see movie for an evening. Hot chocolate and donuts is a must :)… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
NShep53Nov 29, 2016
Dan Fogler made this movie for me and the rest of the cast was great. Funny, dark, charming and exciting, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them was a great surprise. Wasn't expecting it to live up to the legacy, but it does.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
travellynJan 10, 2017
Based on the potter world but not in the uk but in New York giving us a chance to see the wizard if world in a new way making this spin of fresh with a great cast out standing effects and visuals and fun but simple story along with someBased on the potter world but not in the uk but in New York giving us a chance to see the wizard if world in a new way making this spin of fresh with a great cast out standing effects and visuals and fun but simple story along with some awesome and cute magic levels creatures … Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
eagleeyevikingApr 20, 2017
'Fantastic Beasts' is entertaining throughout and sets up its sequels on solid foundations in terms of the bigger picture threat, but the film itself is a choppy, uneven mess between two storylines. It also doesn't help to be filled with bad'Fantastic Beasts' is entertaining throughout and sets up its sequels on solid foundations in terms of the bigger picture threat, but the film itself is a choppy, uneven mess between two storylines. It also doesn't help to be filled with bad CGI and underdeveloped characters.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
potatoman222Jul 21, 2017
Animais Fantástico trás de volta o sentimento de amizade verdadeira que Harry Potter nos deixou no passado. O filme nos proporciona a familiaridade de um universo rico de detalhes e com muita magia para oferecer. Rowling mais uma vez faz umAnimais Fantástico trás de volta o sentimento de amizade verdadeira que Harry Potter nos deixou no passado. O filme nos proporciona a familiaridade de um universo rico de detalhes e com muita magia para oferecer. Rowling mais uma vez faz um ótimo papel ao escrever uma história inspiradora, que diverte, emociona e te faz querer mais um pouco no fim das contas.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ksipeMay 7, 2023
Mediocre, uninspired, boring. Dropped after half an hour. Constant teleportation was obnoxious.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Jill_SandwichFeb 23, 2019
A popcorn flick at the level of Transformers in that it's gimmicky, has no specific age target it's trying to appeal to, & is overly reliant on visuals to distract the audience with a big spectacle. If you're looking for a movie where youA popcorn flick at the level of Transformers in that it's gimmicky, has no specific age target it's trying to appeal to, & is overly reliant on visuals to distract the audience with a big spectacle. If you're looking for a movie where you can shut off your brain, then it's fine.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsJan 2, 2021
It was watchable movie, but I really hate that it really didn't has a proper ending as they just will be makin another sequel and in this one not that many things are resolved really. So ends up like too spread out and when I get to nextIt was watchable movie, but I really hate that it really didn't has a proper ending as they just will be makin another sequel and in this one not that many things are resolved really. So ends up like too spread out and when I get to next movie I will have finished about this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
badgerryan19May 19, 2017
Very enjoyable film. Eddie Redmayne is spectacular as usual and the supporting cast as well. The plot was very entertaining and great CGI. The movie does a very good job by still being part of the Harry Potter universe and it's own film atVery enjoyable film. Eddie Redmayne is spectacular as usual and the supporting cast as well. The plot was very entertaining and great CGI. The movie does a very good job by still being part of the Harry Potter universe and it's own film at the same time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CineAutoctonoJan 16, 2020
"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them"was a movie that although had little enchantress of the Harry Potter´s franchise was a really entertraining movie with new an interesting characters and characteristic magic action, that only the"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them"was a movie that although had little enchantress of the Harry Potter´s franchise was a really entertraining movie with new an interesting characters and characteristic magic action, that only the Wizarding World of J.K. Rowling could bring.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
JeanDuchampJan 10, 2018
A total disaster! Done as a spin-off of a successful franchise for exclusively commercial purposes, this film could at least contain a tiny bit of something, except the worn-out clichés and a set of annoying CGI that lacks even a shadow of aA total disaster! Done as a spin-off of a successful franchise for exclusively commercial purposes, this film could at least contain a tiny bit of something, except the worn-out clichés and a set of annoying CGI that lacks even a shadow of a shadow of imagination... But no, it doesn't! Too dull and mournful for a child, it's absolutely shallow and rudimentary for an adult! An absolute waste of money, time, energy, celluloid, fabrics, wooden sticks, lipsticks, whatever... The bright side of it - yes, I still know a couple of movies even worse than this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
valgov291May 1, 2017
This movie was a fun ride. Aside from a couple plot device solutions and an ambiguous hold on the climactic creature they battle at thee end obliterating everything in its path and then dying very easily the movie was worth watching and IThis movie was a fun ride. Aside from a couple plot device solutions and an ambiguous hold on the climactic creature they battle at thee end obliterating everything in its path and then dying very easily the movie was worth watching and I look forward to a sequel.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Jollyjoe1000Apr 12, 2017
It did have it's boring parts, but most of the time I was intreated by the amazing creativity of the fantastic beasts, and how much of good new hero Newt Scamander was.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
LockeJohnJan 21, 2017
This is easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It was painful to watch. I am the fan of the books, and all the HP movies, but I found this movie boring and unengaging. It's a CGI fest, where you just see colorful pixels movingThis is easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It was painful to watch. I am the fan of the books, and all the HP movies, but I found this movie boring and unengaging. It's a CGI fest, where you just see colorful pixels moving around, without any story or meaning. It might be interesting to preschool children.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
KleverViperDec 22, 2016
This film marks the first time I've ever been to see a film in the cinema and have wanted to leave. The film, despite many cool scenes is just boring. The main male characters are not likeable. It isn't 'fun' like the other Harry PotterThis film marks the first time I've ever been to see a film in the cinema and have wanted to leave. The film, despite many cool scenes is just boring. The main male characters are not likeable. It isn't 'fun' like the other Harry Potter films. Don't bother watching.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AndrewLambertJan 22, 2017
Fantastic Beasts is a intriguing return to the wizarding world, introducing a vastly different universe to explore and some memorably offbeat characters to go with it, in addition to a darker side of the genre that was never explored to itsFantastic Beasts is a intriguing return to the wizarding world, introducing a vastly different universe to explore and some memorably offbeat characters to go with it, in addition to a darker side of the genre that was never explored to its full capability in the Potter movies. That being said, the movie struggles to focus on a coherent storyline and by the time we reach its climax, Beasts has almost totally derailed itself, and the sacrifice of its greatest character in Farrell for the severely waning talents of Depp as Grindelwald feels like a fatal mistake for the remainder of the series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SrPepeJan 3, 2018
Un buen comienzo de lo que espero que sea una gran trilogía. No es la gran cosa pero emociona ver en que se puede convertir.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
lucbevibrasilDec 27, 2016
The film's premise may be silly, but the script signed by J. Rowling herself is quite complex, layered and well built. Underscoring the way the author conveys sensitive issues of today's society in the magical society of the time. But one ofThe film's premise may be silly, but the script signed by J. Rowling herself is quite complex, layered and well built. Underscoring the way the author conveys sensitive issues of today's society in the magical society of the time. But one of the biggest hits of the film is the independence of the other Harry Potter films, whether on the soundtrack of James Newton Howard (a hit), in the more "free" direction of David Yates and note the work of director of photography Philippe Rousselot. The editing of Mark Day sins, damaging the initial rhythm of the film. Finally, the cast also deserves prominence, especially Eddie Redmayne and Katherine Waterson.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
coltrevMay 15, 2017
Brilliant! A great story and another example of one of the most versatile actors in the business today. Eddie is elite - witness his performances in The Science Of Everything, The Danish Girl and now FB.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Pamuditha007Mar 11, 2017
Awesome movie .... the best Harry Potter Universe movie since harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire ...
From the opening theme music to end credit .. so much nostalgic moments from the childhood !!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
triple_coDec 30, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Aesthetically this is a very well made film that looks the part and has the feel of both the Harry Potter franchise and something new. The creatures, locations and characters all look fantastic. There is a lot of be enjoyed in the colours and visuals throughout the movie.

Story wise however, it lacks clarity and focus and tends to leave plot points unattended. Several characters in this film seem to be swept away by the narrative and are unnecessary to the plot, with a couple ultimately being forgotten about by the end. There were too many main characters, leaving the pacing feeling cluttered and overwhelming. In addition, there was not enough focus on the orphanage, Credence or the main villain, Grindelwald. There was lots of world building throughout, but not enough put on the actual characters of this film.

Enjoyable enough, and a movie that Harry Potter fanatics will love, but it lacks focus and gets a little muddled in its pacing and plot.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SouthboundbevyNov 25, 2016
The movie doesn't capture the magic of Harry Potter movies, but it is ok. I just hope that future installments will be better. I need a better story and characters I could like more.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
red_ninja_9Apr 19, 2017
This movie sucked! LOL, over the top with cheesiness made for 12 year old and under. Modern technology and fantasy shouldn't mix, makes no sense how this can be entertaining. I want my money back...please?
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
eva3si0nOct 29, 2018
Spin-off I didn't wait for the main series. Having seen a trailer, I have understood that Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is created first of all on new younger generation. It is some kind of first movie of the saga. Naturally thisSpin-off I didn't wait for the main series. Having seen a trailer, I have understood that Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is created first of all on new younger generation. It is some kind of first movie of the saga. Naturally this movie doesn't come within miles of any part of the original saga. He reminds the parody to the original more. But the parody has turned out good, first of all because all have missed the world created by Rowling. On the other hand it is the excellent family movie with excellent CGI. Initially I waited smaller from this spin-off.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
ourtimehascomeMar 31, 2017
The CGI creatures look like high school notebook rejects. With a lackluster plot and boring characters, even notable performers Eddie Redmayne and Colin Farrell look as though they've lost interest. This blatant, overwrought cash-grab isThe CGI creatures look like high school notebook rejects. With a lackluster plot and boring characters, even notable performers Eddie Redmayne and Colin Farrell look as though they've lost interest. This blatant, overwrought cash-grab is unsatisfying.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
jakem1000Nov 27, 2016
As a fan of the original HP books and movies, this was a huge disappointment. The characters are two-dimensional, the story is both contrived and bizarre. This film is basically an excuse for Warner Bros to make two hours of CGI madnessAs a fan of the original HP books and movies, this was a huge disappointment. The characters are two-dimensional, the story is both contrived and bizarre. This film is basically an excuse for Warner Bros to make two hours of CGI madness (think Michael Bay meets Harry Potter), and make a guaranteed profit. It had potential, but it didn't meet it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CicoNutNov 28, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. J.K. Rowling’s long awaited return to the wizarding world has finally hit cinemas,and it’s not the best movie about sorcerers duking it out in New York to come out this year *cough* Doctor Strange *cough*. In fact, it might just be one of the worst Harry Potter movies so far. But why is this?

Firstly, the movie is far too overstuffed. We are in about half an hour and despite being introduced to him, we know virtually nothing about the protagonist. That’s not always a problem, but when it’s universe building your making time for, it can take you out of the film’s narrative. And this throughout the movie, as it hops back and forth between the main story of Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) gathering his fantastic beasts, a side story about Credence (Ezra Miller) being abused by his mother, another story about Collin Farrell being a fat ugly pale Johnny Depp (spoilers) and another side story about a business man and his son, who runs for president, but promptly dies. And then that story goes absolutely nowhere. Because apparently adult drama became too sophisticated for a wizard movie.

The other problem is the title is misleading: it’s called, ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’, yet some of the creatures just look like hybrid monstrosities and the rest look like already existing animals with giant testicles on their heads. Ew. And the pre-2005 era CGI looks horrendous.

But there is a lot to like in this film, too. Dan Fogler is an absolute joy to watch on screen and steals literally every scene he’s in. That’s why seeing his memory erased in the end saddened me, as it means there won’t be any more Jacob Kowalsky later movies. Aside from him though, Eddie Redmayne does his usual, socially awkward shtick where he just kind of acts like himself, while Katherine Waterson and Fine Frenzy to good jobs as the magical Goldstein Sisters.

While there are some aspects of this movie you can enjoy, you will most likely be disappointed in the not-so-fantastic beasts and the way J.K. Rowling shamelessly tries to cash in on the successes of Marvel and Star Wars, as she spends so much time setting up sequels she ultimately fails to have a little fun and actually tell a good story, which we know she is well capable of doing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
KaptenVideoDec 9, 2016
Not really my cup of tea anymore but If you're into Harry Potter, current wave of superhero movies, and/or "Night at the Museum", you will probably like it quite a bit.

It will probably make a billion dollars (seriously, even the leastNot really my cup of tea anymore but If you're into Harry Potter, current wave of superhero movies, and/or "Night at the Museum", you will probably like it quite a bit.

It will probably make a billion dollars (seriously, even the least successful "Harry Potter" movie did 800 million dollars in cinemas), and it will have four sequels.

I don't want to spoil anything but don't go just to see Johnny Depp.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
maugeishDec 11, 2016
Way better than the Harry Potter series. More adult and less for kids. The plot is great and characters are amazing. Underrated movie. My movie of the year. Excellent.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Magic84Dec 11, 2016
Weak villian due to no motivation explained by a weak plot. Special effects are good but as good as smother movies with similar budget. I feel like they tried way too hard to set up this new franchise rather than produce a solid film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
varmadmcgooDec 23, 2016
Do you want to see inexplicable creatures floating around and destroying New York City, but you aren’t into superhero films like THE AVENGERS? Would you like to see the collective memory of that same city wiped clean of said incident, andDo you want to see inexplicable creatures floating around and destroying New York City, but you aren’t into superhero films like THE AVENGERS? Would you like to see the collective memory of that same city wiped clean of said incident, and were you born so late that you have no idea what MEN IN BLACK is about? Are you curious what a teen with an evil mother figure might do if bestowed with dangerous powers, but CARRIE and all the POLTERGEIST movies seem icky to you? Have you ever wanted to tame a dragon but decided that a movie called HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON was a little "on the nose"? Have you ever wanted to travel back in time to see a Carey Mulligan-type actress in a bob, but your parents told you that any adaptation of THE GREAT GATSBY with rap music must be of the devil? Have you yearned to watch an evil swarm of swarmy bee-like things swarm, but you decided STAR TREK BEYOND was too nerdy for you? Or quite simply did you ever wish that there were an incarnation of The Doctor from DOCTOR WHO that managed to never, ever look anyone (snakeypuffs and planticrawls excepted) in the eyes?

YES? To all of that? Then do we ever have the movie for you!

⁂ Fantastical Beasts is a meaningless amalgamation of clichés, borrowed scenes, ineffective attempts to tug at heartstrings, and shockingly bad (for 2016!) special effects. It’s a hammy trope-fest. While the female lead was endearingly played by Katherine Watterston, it wasn’t close to enough to make this film worthwhile. Yes, this is even true if one knows enough of the Potterverse to know who Grindlewald is, although apparently if a Potterhead is desperate enough, this film will taste like manna: Heavenly to the starved, and like generic, flavorless carbohydrates to the rest of us.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
DikkoJan 24, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not as good as the trailer or BoxOffice would have you believe. I struggled to watch it through to the end. It felt like in order to enhance objectivity, I had to watch the whole thing not because I was willing to. Quite a good number of the scenes were predictable, lacking in substance and senseless. A lot of things just didn't add up. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone I like. And like someone said, it is nowhere near Harry Potter.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DominArsenDec 8, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Les animaux fantastiques
Un film rempli de poésie. Un film qui nous change de l'environnement habituel qu'était l'école et se diversifie pour nous montrer tout le charme que c'est d'être un "sorcier incompris", on y écoute les sons qui retentissent et qui nous rappellent une belle série #HarryPotter.
Cependant un film pas vraiment adapté tout public en revanche plus sombre et éclairci que les autres Harry potter dans certaine de ces phases.
La découverte du bestial est géante, mais peu inspirée parfois [spoiler] (je mets le petit dans le grand et le grand dans le petit) c'est un peu la même chose. [/spoiler] En tout cas c'est un film à aller voir absolument !!! Juste pour la fantaisie et le rêve… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
Benkoko11Feb 23, 2017
Sadly follows its predecessors as wildly dissapointing portrayals of the wonderfully complex and irresistably charming world of Harry Potter. Can someone fire Yates already?
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Jk9785Nov 12, 2018
Yet another solid film by David Yates. It has its problems, but performances from Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, and Dan Fogler, along with a great score from James Newton Howard, really propel this film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
RicardobbtzMar 23, 2017
I started this movie somewhat happy to be back at Harry Potter's universe, but nothing felt the same. The plot is beyond bad, cheesy and forgettable. The main character, which I can't recall the name is a weird Stephen Hawking of EddieI started this movie somewhat happy to be back at Harry Potter's universe, but nothing felt the same. The plot is beyond bad, cheesy and forgettable. The main character, which I can't recall the name is a weird Stephen Hawking of Eddie Redmayne. That said, I was really confused about his Oscar award. It's not acting; he is this way and it doesn't add to the film. The CGI work is incredible, a bit overwhelming. A bunch of good actors misplaced with weird lines and a fast subplot that tried to be serious. People told me it's a children's movie. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone was a children's movie, so to speak, and worked a hundred times better. It bugs me that this movie was done to throw the audience a vast universe of possibilities so I'm sure there will be others to come.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017
This was fantastic! Get it? What a way to introduce Harry Potter fans to a new series, I was on the edge of my seat the entire time during this fun yet surprisingly dark, but not so surprisingly touching film. This is a must see, especiallyThis was fantastic! Get it? What a way to introduce Harry Potter fans to a new series, I was on the edge of my seat the entire time during this fun yet surprisingly dark, but not so surprisingly touching film. This is a must see, especially if you are a Harry Potter fanboy or fangirl!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
BastienSoucasseJun 15, 2017
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is one of these films so great that you find too short. At first, it can seem a little repetitive. But David Yates and JK Rowling managed to amaze me. I've seen someone saying that it's only a series ofFantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is one of these films so great that you find too short. At first, it can seem a little repetitive. But David Yates and JK Rowling managed to amaze me. I've seen someone saying that it's only a series of useless but fun facts that make this film long and with no story. So, indeed some parts can be debated. But you can't tell me that there's no story. To me, the plot is well represented and thickens throughout the film. The Harry Potter universe is entirely respected. The special effects are well done: it's just like we could adopt some of these strange animals to home, like a cat or something. Also, the acting is excellent especially from the main character (played by Eddie Redmayne). I won't write a novel to express my feelings. But I think that this film is a must see at least once.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SonicHD7May 31, 2017
The year is 1926, and Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) has just completed a global excursion to find and document an extraordinary array of magical creatures. Arriving in New York for a brief stopover, he might have come and gone withoutThe year is 1926, and Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) has just completed a global excursion to find and document an extraordinary array of magical creatures. Arriving in New York for a brief stopover, he might have come and gone without incident, were it not for a No-Maj (American for Muggle) named Jacob, a misplaced magical case, and the escape of some of Newt's fantastic beasts, which could spell trouble for both the wizarding and No-Maj worlds.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JPKJun 14, 2019
Decent Prequel
Fantastic Beasts is pretty boring in it's first 25 minutes, But it starts to get fun after that point even though it lacks the magic of the Potter films.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Orli_AguilarJun 5, 2017
Al parecer Yates ha llegado para quedarse. Una vez más hace una película del universo de Harry Potter como todas las otras bajo su dirección, es decir, a penas llegando con tumbos y armando por los pelos un punto donde consigue entretener yAl parecer Yates ha llegado para quedarse. Una vez más hace una película del universo de Harry Potter como todas las otras bajo su dirección, es decir, a penas llegando con tumbos y armando por los pelos un punto donde consigue entretener y cumplir con los estándares necesarios para mantener viva la magia. Ojalá siga siendo capaz, porque se nota que la fórmula está por agotarse.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CoreGamer1408Feb 13, 2022
Eco warrior movie, but not in a bad way or heavy handed way. A wizard with a portable nature reserve in the shape of a (no spoilers). It is all rather simple in it's story tellling. Like abuse people/nature and they maybe become monsters. TheEco warrior movie, but not in a bad way or heavy handed way. A wizard with a portable nature reserve in the shape of a (no spoilers). It is all rather simple in it's story tellling. Like abuse people/nature and they maybe become monsters. The story sets up good personal stakes with mostly good pay offs that actually works rather. With endearing characters to root for. The ending I found rather bitter sweet. What is life, but a bunch of memories and to lose memories is to life imo.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
fearti2Nov 21, 2017
I got the chance to watch Fantastic Beasts bla bla. the other day or should I say I was unfortunate to watch it. The movie is a forced and naff one that is made with commercial concerns. It is a mediocre movie that came out of neverendingI got the chance to watch Fantastic Beasts bla bla. the other day or should I say I was unfortunate to watch it. The movie is a forced and naff one that is made with commercial concerns. It is a mediocre movie that came out of neverending desire of money of J.K Rowling. While watching the movie, you feel that you are bored to the bone of the magical world of Rowling. Besides, it is a shame for Eddie Redmayne and Johnny Depp to be in this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
FilipeNetoJun 26, 2020
The Harry Potter universe has become one of the most lucrative and remarkable cinematic phenomena we know. Personally, I am one of many teenagers who read all the books and saw all the films but I was afraid when I heard about the idea ofThe Harry Potter universe has become one of the most lucrative and remarkable cinematic phenomena we know. Personally, I am one of many teenagers who read all the books and saw all the films but I was afraid when I heard about the idea of making this film. The environment is very different from what we saw in Harry Potter and, if it weren't for the mention of several elements we saw in previous films, the link would be very small. Accentuating the differences is the fact that this film takes place between World Wars and has New York as its setting.

The idea for this film came from the small book "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them", and it follows the adventures of their fictional author, Newt Scamander. He goes to New York with a suitcase of little monsters, some of them escape and their eagerness to recapture them puts the city in an uproar and concerns the magical authorities. However, some incidents are attributed to Scamander's animals, who refute responsibilities and end up engaged in an effort to discover what powerful evil being has caused them.

The story, dark and mysterious, manages to keep our interest but the prestige of Harry Potter universe and our willingness to see how it all will end helped a lot. In fact, now we can check all its problems, which make it more boring than the worst of Harry Potter films: it takes a long time to develop and the story, initially confusing, turns out to be illogical and underdeveloped. Another problem is their poorly developed and generally one-dimensional characters. Scamander may be nerdy but he lacks charisma and leadership. The Goldstein witches goes from naive to stubborn. Credence looks like a man with a traumatic depression and Kowalski is just an idiotic "muggle".

David Yates did a good job. I am convinced that he was decisive in preventing this film from being a fiasco. In fact, with all the problems, the overall performance of the cast, mostly little known to me, is naturally affected and only the hand of a skilled director could help them. Despite being a good actor, Eddie Redmayne does not perform miracles and is far from his best. Dan Fogler managed to be more interesting and charismatic than he, in the same proportion that he knew how to be funny and to captivate public's sympathy. Alison Sudol also captures our sympathy by giving her character a candid and sweet aura, but she is so sugary and stupid that I wanted to hit her with a chair. Another actor able of becoming sympathetic was Ezra Miller, but I think he didn't have enough material to develop his character beyond anger and a depressive cry. Katherine Waterston was uninteresting. Colin Farrell is somber but doesn't seem to know what he's doing. Carmen Ejogo is hateful. Worse than she, Samantha Morton seems to have been inspired by the wicked witch of the fairy tales. We also have the additions of Ron Perlman, unrecognizable but impeccable, and Johnny Depp, who does nothing more than an irrelevant and uninteresting cameo.

Technically, this is a very visual film, thanks to tons of very high quality CGI, as we would expect. Its an expensive film, a super-production where green screen was the key. As it should be, the film is loaded with magical creatures that we have never seen before and each one is more incredible than the other. I especially liked the niffler, which looks like a friendly kleptomaniac platypus. Cinematography is characterized by good colors, a misty but pleasant environment, good use of light and dark and very clear footage. To add aesthetic quality, we have the charm of the Thirties, the golden decade for New York. Few decades have given us so much charm and style: magnificent cars, clothes and props that are still in fashion today and an incredible urban landscape, where there is no lack of fog and rain. For a moment, I almost felt like I was in a gangster movie, just missing the jazz background. The soundtrack, by James Newton Howard, is good and epic, but it is not surprising for those who has seen Harry Potter.

Although the film exudes style, it lacks content, good characters and a strong and charismatic lead. Anyway, it achieved a feat that even Harry Potter, who broke box office records, managed to achieve: finally the franchise won an Oscar, for Best Costume Design, which in fact was deserved.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Kire_92May 4, 2018
It a fun movie but it got some flaws. I did not care much about the story and thought that the majority of the characters were uninteresting, including the main character. And for some reason it did not give me the Harry Potter feeling whichIt a fun movie but it got some flaws. I did not care much about the story and thought that the majority of the characters were uninteresting, including the main character. And for some reason it did not give me the Harry Potter feeling which made it feel like a fan film with a very high budget. Though the movie was not boring, it was just lacking anything that was truly interesting. In the end it was still enjoyable overall but I hope they make the sequel more interesting plot wise.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
d0vla11Dec 16, 2018
I've never been into Rowling's universe before this film, but decided to give it a try. Really liked it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SoulWarfareMay 16, 2021
Magic Cash-Cow: and How to Milk It.

It's not quite as magical or amazing as Harry Potter but there is definitely something there.

This is a good start to a new story in the Magical World of Harry Potter. Hopefully, sequels don't let it down.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RaduAMar 16, 2019
72/100

  It's a decent fantasy movie.   The biggest problem I have with the movie is the villain, super predictable ...   The acting is ok (I liked Eddie Redmayne).   The CGI is OK (this cloud looks terrible).   The story is ok (I was not a72/100

  It's a decent fantasy movie.
  The biggest problem I have with the movie is the villain, super predictable ...
  The acting is ok (I liked Eddie Redmayne).
  The CGI is OK (this cloud looks terrible).
  The story is ok (I was not a big fan of Harry Potter so I can not compare it).
  In conclusion, this movie is ok ...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
GrantD243Dec 3, 2018
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them has the magical feeling that you want from a Harry Potter film. It's also awesome to see what it's like for adults to be out in the magical world on their own and freely use magic as they see fit. NewtFantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them has the magical feeling that you want from a Harry Potter film. It's also awesome to see what it's like for adults to be out in the magical world on their own and freely use magic as they see fit. Newt is also a very likable character, arguably much more likable than any of the kids in the original Harry Potter films. Unfortunately, the story just doesn't do it for me. The creatures are cool, but Newt spends most of the film just chasing creatures around New York, while there's also a sub-plot that is trying to incorporate some darker themes into the film. Neither storyline is particularly that interesting or engaging, and I couldn't help but be disappointed that this is all J.K. Rowling could come up with for the Harry Potter first spin-off film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
meydianarizki21Mar 15, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No story & too much CGI
I have to say that I am really disappointed of the movie as a whole. The Harry Potter movies are easily one of the best and most rewatchable movie franchises so far. And this movie is sadly nothing like the original HP movies. The only thing that is has in common are the special effects (for the apparitions). There was no real dialogue between the characters. Just silly one-liners and the occasional humorous remark. I am also very angered by the fact that they just introduced a new concept (obscurials) to the HP franchise that would literally change everything (if obscurials exist why hasn't Harry Potter become one? After all he fits the criteria).

There was also way too much CGI in the movie. It became a real nuisance after a while. Especially because it wasn't even "up to today's standards".

My final critique concerns the overall flair of the movie. It just didn't feel like it belongs to the magnum opus that is the HP movie franchise. And righteously so; why did they film it in NYC? The HP franchise is the most British thing since James Bond and Doctor Who. I never really realized it before but now that I watched this movie it became very clear to me. You can't just change the location like this and expect the audience to embrace it. Sorry. What's next? Fantastic Beasts in Japan? No thanks. We already have that, it's called Kaiju.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
clarkaddisonNov 15, 2018
If you are a massive Potter head, and havent seen this which would be a shock, then go watch it. Otherwise most audience members may not like it. It`s a period movie, as in it happens in another time of the world, it`s a magic movie. To startIf you are a massive Potter head, and havent seen this which would be a shock, then go watch it. Otherwise most audience members may not like it. It`s a period movie, as in it happens in another time of the world, it`s a magic movie. To start a 5 movie or so franchise you could have done better. But it was still a blast to back into the wizarding world… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JAHA301Nov 20, 2018
This movie is not for Muggles but the Potterheads will enjoy it a lot.

ist's Fantastic
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DoniJrNov 8, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' was one of the most coziest movies from 2016 for me. The Wizarding World franchise it's a home for me and even when it shows it's flaws (biggers and minors) I love it anyway. I think this movie was a good starter and even if the tone was not so focused and the revelations were quite predictable, it's a story that I'll keep close to my heart. It was to great to know more about the wizarding world in America and the final scenes (from the Obscurial attacks to the partting of ways) were thrilling, beautiful and emotional.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MurNov 11, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Good knklnilnlilbjlbjbljlbljbjkbklnklnklnklnlkvlklknlkvlvkljvlkvklvweknfdjekskgfe… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Mikibruno02Nov 8, 2020
WOW! WE'RE BACK! Okay, now I'll try to rate it without being swayed by the fact that, gee (!), I was looking forward to seeing a movie set again in J.K. Rowling. Great script, really! In spite of the latest films by H.P. made by David YatesWOW! WE'RE BACK! Okay, now I'll try to rate it without being swayed by the fact that, gee (!), I was looking forward to seeing a movie set again in J.K. Rowling. Great script, really! In spite of the latest films by H.P. made by David Yates who now seems to have left the darkness! The soundtrack of J.N. Howard is truly adorable as well as the set design that is rarely so well looked after, as the costumes that have earned him an Oscar. Colin Farrell, truly remarkable. Do I have to find any faults? Maybe it could last a few minutes less and allow more space to focus on the plot. Really beautiful fantastic animals and ending with a stellar surprise bang. Thanks to the ending I can't wait to see the 4 sequels. Overall rating: 8. Hurray!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JojonutNov 19, 2018
Coming from the books, I was never a fan of the Harry Potter movies so I didn't bother watching "Fantastic Beasts" until recently on Netflix. Honestly, I was pleasantly surprised by how good it is. The story seems much darker than the HarryComing from the books, I was never a fan of the Harry Potter movies so I didn't bother watching "Fantastic Beasts" until recently on Netflix. Honestly, I was pleasantly surprised by how good it is. The story seems much darker than the Harry Potter series, definitely more tailored towards adults but that's what I enjoyed about it. I found the main cast of characters very likeable and rooted for each one. Honestly, I was really afraid about the theme music, because of Harry Potter, if it had even the slightest similarities to it's iconic soundtrack, I would have cringed but the music didn't resemble Harry Potter at all, even though it wasn't as memorable. Good thing I watched this movie as late as I did, because I don't want this story to end!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
BulgarianCriticNov 21, 2018
I was never a big fan of harry potter so i wasn't expecting anything that interesting when i went to the theaters to watch Fantastic beasts and where to find them.And oh boy i am glad i did.The effects of the creatures were really well madI was never a big fan of harry potter so i wasn't expecting anything that interesting when i went to the theaters to watch Fantastic beasts and where to find them.And oh boy i am glad i did.The effects of the creatures were really well mad and the story and characters were also intriguing to watch and listen to.If you wanna see some interesting fantastical beasts and also some harry potter magic i suggest you go watch it… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
WordsmythologicApr 14, 2022
Please stop giving She Who Must Not Be Named money. Your nostalgia goggles are lying to you. And this movie is a disaster. The sequels get even worse.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
silbakkerJan 17, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. LOVED IT! I do think there is a little too much about Newt, he gets a little boring after 10 minutes or so. But I LOVED IT!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JoesDec 19, 2019
Es mejor que varias películas de Harry Potter su trama sus efectos especiales y sus personajes son una maravilla
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TomtagApr 14, 2019
The movie was quite entertaining for me, meeting some new fantastic and magical creatures with some great viaual effects as we wanted to see more of that
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
NicholasmaximusApr 23, 2019
Lacked that magical feeling that one got from Harry Potter. The world was created and was good but then lost with movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

66 Critic Reviews

7.2 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL