Read Positive User Reviews for Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

10

dspratlinNov 19, 2016

What’s it about?

Eccentric magizoologist Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) misplaces an enchanted suitcase in 1920s New York. An extremely profitable franchise is unleashed. What did I think? Hey, you guys like Harry Potter? Then I’ve gotWhat’s it about?

Eccentric magizoologist Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) misplaces an enchanted suitcase in 1920s New York. An extremely profitable franchise is unleashed.

What did I think?

Hey, you guys like Harry Potter? Then I’ve got good news: Fantastic Beasts is the worthy spin-off that you’re going to be really into for the next ten years or so. While it’s darker than the original films, it’s packed with subtle little nods to them that fans will adore, and the story (though somewhat complicated) is good enough to stand alone. It’s tremendous fun to see the wizarding world through a 1920s lens – magical speakeasy, anyone? – and the inhabitants of Scamander’s Pokeball-meets-TARDIS suitcase are just as fantastic as advertised. This film will frighten young children, but everyone else will be thoroughly enchanted.… Expand

20 of 35 users found this helpful2015

All this user's reviews

8

Happy-KMay 26, 2019

You can fell the magic again. The Movie just is enjoyment pure. As an big Harry Potter Fan this movie just works. The Story may not be Special but seeing the American side of the Wizarding World is Fresh and interesting and the Main cast alsoYou can fell the magic again. The Movie just is enjoyment pure. As an big Harry Potter Fan this movie just works. The Story may not be Special but seeing the American side of the Wizarding World is Fresh and interesting and the Main cast also works for the most part. I personally find Newt an good Main Protagonist but i kind of missed that he gets no real development so the thing he says at the end is ironic. The Main Villain was fantastically played. I was invested in the World and the Beasts. The CGI was really good for the most Part, only the last showdown was a little to much in may opinion. I got to admit that this Movie is one of my favorite Harry Potter movies even it has probably not the same quality as some of the older ones.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

9

Trineo99Nov 17, 2018

First of all, a majority of the casting for the characters was fantastic. Each actor or actress fit their respected role perfectly. This can be seen with Eddie Redmayne. He just played Newt in such a way that he was relatable. He was such aFirst of all, a majority of the casting for the characters was fantastic. Each actor or actress fit their respected role perfectly. This can be seen with Eddie Redmayne. He just played Newt in such a way that he was relatable. He was such a charismatic character that everybody loves. Also, Dan Fogler was hilarious as Jacob Kowalski. He had pretty much all of the funny lines in this film. He also was the audience character which was nice to have in a film like this. The score by James Newton Howard was incredible to hear. The costumes in this film, which are Oscar-winning, are fabulous. They look like they were taken out of a history book for what people might have worn in the 1920’s. The last good thing I want to mention is the visual effects and set designs. Their production design was Oscar-nominated and you can see why. You can see how much detail went into each set that they wanted to show in this film. Same thing with the special effects. All the beasts and creatures in this film looked remarkable. Now some things that they could of fixed was the pacing in the film. The pacing was all over the place. It almost felt like they didn’t know how to end some scenes or they thought the scene was too long and cut it too early. This also could be a cause of some poor editing. There were some awkward transitions in this film that didn’t make sense. The last thing I want to mention is the plot holes. I feel like the writers had to ignore them or else there wouldn’t have been a film. In the end, Fantastic Beasts is a stunning film that just has a few issues but I still recommend to watch.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

WaelNov 21, 2016

Set in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everythingSet in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everything Rowling has ever touched. With a great script from JK, great direction from David Yates, outstanding performances from the whole cast (Eddie Redmayne especially), and breath-taking visual effects, it's safe to say that this is the first journey of what looks like a franchise that will be up to the level of the pinnacle that is Harry Potter.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

7

Muskrat147Nov 18, 2016

With incredible special effects and exceptional performances, Fantastic Beasts figures out how to stand up all on its own, even if it feels like somewhat of a set-up for future installments.

9 of 13 users found this helpful94

All this user's reviews

9

A1yrNov 18, 2016

A worthy successor of Harry Potter movies, well thought out story and good casting make it works. Finally we get some insight to the wizard's world, and we like it. I think CGI is exaggerate, however it's well made and enjoyable.

12 of 18 users found this helpful126

All this user's reviews

7

EpicLadySpongeNov 18, 2016

This spin-off of the Harry Potter franchise isn't what everyone was expecting to see, but just for the benefit of it, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them builds a feeling connected to the original Harry Potter books and/or movies and theThis spin-off of the Harry Potter franchise isn't what everyone was expecting to see, but just for the benefit of it, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them builds a feeling connected to the original Harry Potter books and/or movies and the spirit lives on.… Expand

12 of 18 users found this helpful126

All this user's reviews

7

busbfranNov 19, 2016

Fantastic Beasts is a fun adventure set in the magical word that we have ALL come to love! However this spin off fails to capture the raw amazement the originals did. Mediocre performances, hit & miss dialogue really flat line the moviesFantastic Beasts is a fun adventure set in the magical word that we have ALL come to love! However this spin off fails to capture the raw amazement the originals did. Mediocre performances, hit & miss dialogue really flat line the movies overall quality. Unfortunately this magical world may have already surpassed its hay days.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

9

PerculaNov 20, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Well, this franchise certainly has my attention now or, let's say, once more. Fantastic Beasts is magic and the only flaw that gets to me might be a personal taste problem: The casting of Johnny Depp as Gellert Grindelwald, when actually the whole movie made me more and more interested not only in Colin Farrell's character but also his performance.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

7

JyroJyroSep 19, 2017

It's a weird blend of childish silliness and gritty seriousness but it just about fits. A charming world with an array of equally charming (and uncomplicated) characters.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

M_RidcullySep 9, 2017

I think if more people could set nostalgia aside they'd realize this is a much better film than the entire HP series. Moving to 1920's America setting and removing the angsty teenagers who have to save the world because the negligent adultsI think if more people could set nostalgia aside they'd realize this is a much better film than the entire HP series. Moving to 1920's America setting and removing the angsty teenagers who have to save the world because the negligent adults are too incompetent are both absolute improvements.

Newt himself is an extremely underrated character, and brilliantly portrayed by Eddie Redmayne. See Pop Culture Detective's "The Fantastic Masculinity of Newt Scamander" on Youtube for a better examination, but I'll sum it up here: He's not macho or "The Chosen One" or a witty schmoozer. But he doesn't fall into the typical nerd/genius/outsider stereotypes either. He's quiet, introverted, humble and sensitive, but also confident in his abilities and sympathetic towards his beasts as well as humans.

The only major downside to the movie was that it couldn't decide which movie it wanted to be: a lighthearted romp about chasing down escaped magical beasts, or a dark conflict between wizards, anti-wizard muggles, and dark wizards. I personally preferred the latter, but it would not make a lot of sense to have Newt in a movie purely about that (and of course the former also brings child appeal and toy sales to the table).… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

DobbyTheFreeElfNov 19, 2016

I really like this movie! BEST MOVIE IN 2016! Great acting. The beasts are fantastic. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. But the picture — directed by David Yates, who also gave us the last four Harry Potter films, terrific ones —I really like this movie! BEST MOVIE IN 2016! Great acting. The beasts are fantastic. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. But the picture — directed by David Yates, who also gave us the last four Harry Potter films, terrific ones — feels both sprawling and crowded, as if it were trying to pack too much mythology into one cramped crawlspace. Fantastic Beasts is a prequel, set years before Harry Potter was even a zigzag-lightning-scar-shaped gleam in his parents’ eye: it’s 1920s New York, and Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), a “magizoologist” with insider knowledge of all sorts of magical creatures, is just arriving from London. Stateside, it’s a troubled and troubling time: the underground wizarding community is under threat, because a whirling black whatchamacallit has been forging a path of destruction through the New York City streets. To protect their ranks, the wizards must take great care to hide their powers from the No-Majs (the American term for Muggles). It doesn’t help that a fanatical group, led by Samantha Morton’s demonically prim Mary Lou Barebone, is out to break the wizards’ ranks apart. Also, dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald has gone missing—in case you happen to find that Fantastic Beasts doesn’t have enough plot points for you to digest.

Into this mess steps Scamander, hoping to research some new magical beasts and protect some that have become endangered. He happens to carry a number of such creatures in his mystically bottomless suitcase (more on that later), though their misbehavior ends up landing him, and the new friends he makes, in a great deal of trouble. Those misadventures involve an earnest, friendly No-Maj and aspiring baker, Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler); Tina Goldstein (Katharine Waterston), a “Statute of Secrecy” enforcer who misperceives what Scamander is up to and tries to turn him in to the wizarding officials; and Tina’s sister, Queenie (Alison Sudol), a charming flapper-girl who can read minds as efficiently as a voracious grade-school reader tearing her way through all seven Harry Potter books.

There’s so much going on in Fantastic Beasts that after the first act, you almost can’t be bothered to care what happens next. In the movie’s world, there’s a magical explanation for everything, which means story logic too often gets left by the wayside. (In the Harry Potter books, Rowling did a remarkable job of making magical logic seem consistent and believable, and the movie adaptations followed suit; that clarity has been lost here.) And even though the movie preaches tolerance, its ideas never quite jell. Still, Yates and Rowling are intent on working their charm on us, and some of it sticks: If Redmayne’s performance is just too adorably mannered, Fogler and Sudol twirl through their roles like dance-floor champs — both have low-key, breezy allure.… Expand

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

10

FrankSamNov 21, 2016

This film is the perfect expansion of the Harry Potter universe. Thanks to J.K. Rowling as the screenwriter and producer, and David Yates as the director, we can enjoy a very dark, mature and humorous film. Eddie Redmayne appears to be aThis film is the perfect expansion of the Harry Potter universe. Thanks to J.K. Rowling as the screenwriter and producer, and David Yates as the director, we can enjoy a very dark, mature and humorous film. Eddie Redmayne appears to be a flawless actor that can play any role. The soundtrack was very emotional and nostalgic: in fact we can notice an inspiration from the famous Hedwig's Them from Harry Potter. Moreover, the cinematography is fantastic and very detailed.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

7

yezoNov 19, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is okay, a lot of expectations from the movie but I was not as satisfied. The plot is ok. Some CGI is good, some is pathetic, particularly at the end, the farewell of Newt and the thunder bird, the CGI is so bad.
A lot of stuff was not quite make sense, I feel like there was a bit of rush about the orphanage, and constant cut scenes from Newt and Tina then to orphanage does not quite connect. At the end, I kinda of feel like Grindelwald might show up base on those newspaper headlines earlier. But Johnny Depp, wtf, I was expecting someone from Bulgaria or Russia.
The aims and objective for Grindelwald is not well explained, and c'mon man, the greatest dark wizard at that time, got defeated in no time.
But I have to declare I have not read the book yet.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

9

PhamAnhTuanNov 19, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Everything is great from the story to the CGI effects. The twist, the acting,... are great too. Its a nice Spin-off from the Harry Potter's franchise but the film is kinda not as good as i expected ,there are some plot holes and the ending is not perfect at all, The antagonist isnt bad at all he has a great ideology but the way he did it, which is wrong in many levels, the other one is seemed to be very powerful but in the end the MACUSA easily kill him within 30s - I mean what the f*ck , i thought there would be a lot of magical fight scences . That are the down-side of the film. In the end this film is very good and enoyable . Im looking forward to the sequel in 2018.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

SEROJNov 18, 2016

Don't get me wrong. I'm a huge Harry Potter fan. I grew up with it. I was so happy when i found out that J.K.Rowling is planning to get us back to the wizarding world! Yeah but... no. The characters are interesting, but not complete. WithoutDon't get me wrong. I'm a huge Harry Potter fan. I grew up with it. I was so happy when i found out that J.K.Rowling is planning to get us back to the wizarding world! Yeah but... no. The characters are interesting, but not complete. Without spoiling - you may not understand or care about the main "villian" in the movie, because the movie doesn't really tell much about him. The thing you probably liked the most in Harry Potter - the mystery, is really lacking in this movie! It's replaced by more action and comedy! The story was not that bad, don't get me wrong! But i really think that we needed more characters with more stories about them, so we could care about the plot. Because that's what the wizarding world was all about! The only character that gets that attention (without spoiling) is not even a wizard. I'm sorry for my bad english. Overall - i recommend this movie to pretty much everyone. I really liked it and i'm looking forward to the sequel!… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

10

moothemagiccowNov 19, 2016

We're no longer seeing 500 page books pared down to 2 hour compromises. Rowling is working within the medium and allowed to flourish. For the first time, I'm seeing her work portrayed on film and not knowing exactly what to expect.
I'm oldWe're no longer seeing 500 page books pared down to 2 hour compromises. Rowling is working within the medium and allowed to flourish. For the first time, I'm seeing her work portrayed on film and not knowing exactly what to expect.
I'm old and jaded, but this film delivered a true sense of wonder to me. Rowling's magic is just like what she put in her books. It's funny and intriguing. It's odd. It starts from an unlikely place but manages to get all the way to deep issues of society and self.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

8

Silverscreen91Nov 18, 2016

We travel once again into the magical world of Harry Potter, several decades before the rise of You-Know-Who and the birth of The Boy Who Lived, by following the misadventures of Newt Scamander in America and discovering his Fantastic Beasts.We travel once again into the magical world of Harry Potter, several decades before the rise of You-Know-Who and the birth of The Boy Who Lived, by following the misadventures of Newt Scamander in America and discovering his Fantastic Beasts. In this misadventure we get a treat of a film that is a decent follow up to the masterpiece of its predecessor but stumbles a little on the execution.

The biggest fault of the film is the story, or at least specific parts of it. The film is a little too obvious with its foreshadowing and setup, which distracts from the rest of the film. The entire subplot with the "exposure of the magical world" and the involvement of the "Magical Congress of the United States of America" (or "MACUSA") is interesting, but ultimately unnecessary for the movie until the sequels come out. When the film focuses on the Fantastic Beasts and Newt Scamander themselves, it shines, only to be rusted by the political overtones and the unneeded dark magic involved.

The characters are all fun and very distinct. They all have very unique looks and actions to them that makes them memorable and likable. The distinctions come to a disadvantage, however. The roles of each character is so obviously cliche that, if it weren't for the decent acting chops of all involved and the additional character tidbits added in, it would be rather painful. Newt is obviously the hero, Kowalski is obviously the comic relief, Tina is obviously the heroic girl and so on. The effects are a little questionable. It's easy to make out a lot of the CGI, and the filmmakers would have done well to use more practical effects. Especially for creatures that were on screen for a long time. For a movie that's based around them, that's a pretty big flaw.

The movie is good, but it could have been much better. If they cut out the subplots and add in more practical effects, we could have had the Magical World equivalent of Jurassic Park. Instead we get an enjoyable movie that is bogged down by stories that are obviously meant to set up future sequels.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

9

PipeCNov 18, 2016

Scamander's Lumos Maxima Is Sufficient For Another J.K. Rowling's Heptalogy

It was predicted by the selfsame Rowling: "If I have a sufficiently powerful idea, I will come back", it is. The return to the wizarding universe most acclaimed ofScamander's Lumos Maxima Is Sufficient For Another J.K. Rowling's Heptalogy

It was predicted by the selfsame Rowling: "If I have a sufficiently powerful idea, I will come back", it is. The return to the wizarding universe most acclaimed of all time was as logical and pressing as the return to Katniss Everdeen's Panem or a galaxy far, far away in "Star Wars". "Fantastic Beasts" fulfills all its aims with faultless expertise: conceiving the spinoff wished by all fanatics drawing on Harry Potter's rich mythology to forged a style of its own which stands out with power of franchise, introducing to the most apathetic or uninterested people of Rowling's writings and laying a consistent foundations for extensive franchise which has in front of its wand.

Seductive prequel begins in in the midst of the 1920s, in New York precisely, a period of economic prosperity. Magizoologist Newton "Newt" Artemis Fido Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) born in 1897, who was expelled from Hogwarts due to an incident with one of his beloved offsprings, does expeditions across five continents to register, protect—from the most dangerous specimens in the planet, "humans—" and categorize magical creatures in order to write a meticulous textbook of preservation about them, entitled "Fantastic Beats and Where to Find Them" (with a foreword written by Albus Dumbledore: "Never tickle a sleeping dragon"). These trips take him to 'The Big Apple', where meets the baker Jacob Kowalski (Dan Floger), who accidentally takes Scamander's fabulous carrying case. That mistake ends with the catastrophic opening of the suitcase, which four celestial animals escape ("Night at the Museum" style). While Kowalski, Scamander, Goldstein (Katherine Waterston) — a police belonging to the 'MACUSA' — and her charismatic sister Queenie (Alison Sudol) are in the exhaustive animal search and capture, in Europe, malicious and powerful dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) causes great vicissitudes, which will be connected ominously with animal chase in North America.

The charm, excitement and fantasy projected before us were theoretically 'as if by magic', nonetheless, such magic is performed by explicit magicians. The first of them is who has been behind the art of wizards all this time, J. K. Rowling, who now holds the start of this new story with her own hands, since in addition to assembling almost naturally the new piece within Harry Potter's vast universe, wrote the screenplay of all the characters involved. British (screen)writer makes a well-built beginning as such; it's for that reason that first installment is crammed with information, narrative threads as: The Magical Congress of the United States of America (which is strictly dissimilar to the British), varied range of suggestive characters, meaningful range of facts, ambitious catalog of creatures and the presentation of who perhaps will be the king-villain of the saga (akin to 'Thanos' in "MCU").

Second miracle worker is director-producer David Yates, who was in the middle of Gabonese jungle with "The Legend of Tarzan" in July and concluded masterfully the story of Harry, Ron and Hermione with "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 & Part 2" in 2010 and 2011 respectively; he enigmatically returns to inaugurate a new and long chapter, which probably also will direct. His tremendous experience is imposed on the fluidity of the story, the refreshing and vital blocking and assiduous harmony of every complex aspect on the screen. It is open to view that Yates and Rowling are understood well and for the sake of their all 'muggles', that honest connection must endure.

Our third magicians are the art, production and boundless special effects team, they demonstrated some of their aces under the sleeve, the others are kept for future films. Simply by the imaginative, surprising and sophisticated recreation of the 1920s, radiant —and sometimes terrifying— creatures, thundering lightning flashes of wands, flying food and objects in the movie, parallel worlds of the suitcase of Newt and more are a compelling Academy Awards nomination. Maybe there is a little excessive use of CGI, but if the current blockbusters abusing technology for purposes like these, they have the clear path.

Lastly, but no less important, the true wizards of the story. Oscar-winning Eddie Redmayne wears the coat that made Radcliffe shine in his time. The new hero for a new era of magic has an inherent connection with his stooped over way of walking, his shy personality and bangs manage to create an overwhelming and interesting atmosphere. His team is equally effective, however, Dan Floger ("No-maj") is who amuses us and provides part of the comicality in the film, and in addition, gives us glimpses of silent film. On the dark side of witchcraft and wizardry, Colin Farrell, Ezra Miller and the short cameo by Johnny Depp become the subplot into something scary, creepy and not too suitable for kids— substantially, pointing out in the excellent performances and background music by James Newton Howard.

"Fantastic Beasts" fortuitously becomes us absent-minded of the original series, with a spin-off packed with magic, joy, new opportunities and surprises to come. The faithful muggles—or No-maj— of Rowling have a lot to be happy with the return to the essence of Harry Potter with a golden and striking wrapping which promises fabulous visuals, stories, and possibilities. Open that suitcase, we are on the right way.… Expand

11 of 18 users found this helpful117

All this user's reviews

7

MrMovieBuffNov 20, 2016

'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' is the first screenwriting credit for "Harry Potter" author, J.K. Rowling, who plans on taking this beloved franchise and expanding it, since that is the current trend of Hollywood blockbusters, these'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' is the first screenwriting credit for "Harry Potter" author, J.K. Rowling, who plans on taking this beloved franchise and expanding it, since that is the current trend of Hollywood blockbusters, these days. Eddie Redmayne stars as Newt Scamander, a wizard employee at the Ministry of Magic who travels to New York. It's 1926, and Newt appears to be carrying around a case that seems to hold a living creature inside. He tries everything he can to retrieve the creature when it's escaped and starts to cause trouble, on the way, he runs into a man named Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler) that takes one of Newt's mysterious eggs when he leaves it behind. Meanwhile, a woman named Tina Goldstein (Katherine Waterston), another wizard is concerned that Newt may have let Jacob, who is a "No-Maj" - which is an American term for "Muggle", meaning non-magic humans - know too much about the wizard world, and his memory must be "Obliviated". But Jacob gets away with the egg, and Newt and Tina must get it back before more chaos ensues. Meanwhile, we meet a high-ranking Auror and Director of the Magical Security named Percival Graves (Colin Farrell) who appears to get close to a young boy named Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller) whose family seems to be holding some dark, magical secrets that Graves needs to know more about. Graves also discovers that there are some dark magic that invades the whole of New York, and it's up to Newt, Tina and Jacob to try and stop it. Seeing the few unlikely heroes reluctantly go on their unexpected journey together is fun and riveting, and the cast do an excellent job to get you invested in what might happen in future sequels... it appears that there will be four more movies to come out of this. The worst thing I can say about "Fantastic Beasts" is that, it's not "Harry Potter"... there is no young boy discovering the gifts of magic, there is little awe and it's not quite as whimsical. But, director David Yates - who directed the last four "Harry Potter" installments - keeps things balanced. The pacing of the story is a little uneven, as there are some amazing scenes where we discover a world of magical beasts, and there are some slow, scary and chilling moments about the dark magic. 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' isn't necessarily exciting, but it has made me curious for where the characters might go in future sequels. Whether or not this will match or even surpass the quality of the "Harry Potter" franchise, we will never know. But, if you watch it as a franchise on its own terms, it's still good! I liked the characters, I liked the creatures, I liked the new story... this is a franchise that should get more attention.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

10

josephgmNov 19, 2016

This movie had a great plot and extremely interesting character list. Eddie Redmayne did a fantastic job of Newt and portrayed the inner character. CGI wasn't as good as I thought it would be, which was one of the let downs. But the nifflerThis movie had a great plot and extremely interesting character list. Eddie Redmayne did a fantastic job of Newt and portrayed the inner character. CGI wasn't as good as I thought it would be, which was one of the let downs. But the niffler was an extremely adorable addition to the movie. I thought this movie was incredible and fun to watch. Good job Yates and Rowling!… Expand

12 of 21 users found this helpful129

All this user's reviews

10

batxavierNov 18, 2016

Gran comienzo de la saga. Mostrandose en su primera parte la similitud con los primeros libros como la aventura, descubrir nuevos bestias. Ya en su recta final se notan las similitudes con las ultimas peliculas de David Yates(masGran comienzo de la saga. Mostrandose en su primera parte la similitud con los primeros libros como la aventura, descubrir nuevos bestias. Ya en su recta final se notan las similitudes con las ultimas peliculas de David Yates(mas enfrentamientos, drama).Y dejando un final que da ganas de ver mas.… Expand

12 of 21 users found this helpful129

All this user's reviews

9

TSTINKERSNov 23, 2016

I really enjoyed this movie. It's basically like a Harry Potter. Lots of new characters and not everything was predictable either. There will be sequel!

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

10

chrisblackeyeNov 18, 2016

amazing film with well made settings and enchanting moments. JK is such a talented writer with a script that keeps you at the edge until the very last moment. Yates' directing is really good

13 of 23 users found this helpful1310

All this user's reviews

8

mrushing02Nov 18, 2016

In 1926 a former Hogwarts student, Newt Scamander travels to New York with a case full of magical creatures only to find himself pulled into the strange world of magic in the United States, which is very different than Britain. The MagicalIn 1926 a former Hogwarts student, Newt Scamander travels to New York with a case full of magical creatures only to find himself pulled into the strange world of magic in the United States, which is very different than Britain. The Magical Congress of the United States of America (MACUSA) is embroiled in a situation that threatens the safety of the wizarding community as well as the No-Majs (Muggles). It also jeopardizes the International Statute of Secrecy, risking the exposure of the wizarding world in America. Newt and his beasts may be just the thing needed to help bring to light the true forces at work.

Us vs Them

The Magical community has been hidden from the rest of the world since 1692 when the International Confederation of Wizards enacted the International Statute of Secrecy to protect itself from Muggles or No-Majs. In America it has created an even stricter divide between the two worlds as witches and wizards are forbidden to marry non-magic folk. It's created a sense of superiority in the magical community which Tina clearly show when she says to Newt, "Why would I want to marry him?", pointing at Jacob, a No-Maj that has unwittingly become entangled in the wizarding world. The No-Maj world is no better. Mary Lou Barebone who runs an orphanage and the New Salem Philanthropic Society, works to indoctrinate the children she "cares" for and the people of New York of the dangers go witches and wizards in their midst. There is a real sense of tension that is palpable as each side cloisters in it's group, spreading fear of the other.

The movie, in subtle ways, slowly undermines this idea of Us vs Them through the character of Jacob. In America, a No-Maj is immediately obliviated (a memory charm) so that they do not remember what they have seen, yet circumstances in the film make that impossible. Jacob and Newt form a friendship, learn from one another as they share their worlds. Jacob also has a major impact on Tina and Queenie Goldstein who, for the first time in their lives, get to spend significant time with someone from the "other side". It's beautiful to see the fear of the unknown vanish as communication leads to the awareness that they're not that different. In the real world where this happens every day, the message is clear, true knowledge of the "other" side only comes though interaction, communication and an open mind.

The Movie

This is the first of five movies in the Fantastic Beasts series, written specifically for the screen by J.K. Rowling. There is a really strength to this since there are no books to compare it to leaving the audience free to enjoy the film for it's own sake. The movie does a good job of laying the foundations for the world of wizardry in this time period as well as what's to come in the series. The cast is outstanding, with the relationship between Alison Sudol as Queenie Goldstein and Dan Fogler as Jacob Kowalski being a true highlight. James Newton Howard's score is good, even if it never reached the heights of Williams and the production value, character design and world building is, well, magical. The film nicely begins it's journey to telling the history of the Harry Potter universe that we got hints of in the previous series, making it a wonderful addition and expansion to the world, yet, at the same time, it stands on it's own. Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is rated 4 out of five Bowtruckles.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

8

SSH83Nov 23, 2016

The only blondie is an airhead. The white hair ones are either incompetent or evil. There is no shortage of bad things and plot holes, but the fantastic production outshines it all. The CG really turned Rowling's quriky monsters intoThe only blondie is an airhead. The white hair ones are either incompetent or evil. There is no shortage of bad things and plot holes, but the fantastic production outshines it all. The CG really turned Rowling's quriky monsters into Fantastic beasts, and the principle cast did a good job at making me care about their characters. Rowling's go-to-choice for a whimsical adventure with foreshadowing of greater plot is still here and it's good entertainment... if you just accept it for what it is... a kid's movie.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

10

LinttaFlamingoNov 26, 2016

Harry Potter is the biggest part of my childhood, so it's no surprise that I was waiting for Fantastic Beasts more than anything else this year. But finally the wait is over, and I can feast on this movie with my eyes! And for all youHarry Potter is the biggest part of my childhood, so it's no surprise that I was waiting for Fantastic Beasts more than anything else this year. But finally the wait is over, and I can feast on this movie with my eyes! And for all you Potterheads out there, I've got some good news! Fantastic Beasts is just what the title says, it is fantastic. The biggest surprise for me was the fact that this movie doesn't rely on nostalgia and just try to set up sequels, but instead it gives us a good story, interesting characters portrayed by fantastic actors and last but not least, it gives us the feeling that we really are in the Harry Potter world once again! There's magic, there's wonder, there's color and an overall feeling of warmth here. Eddie Redmayne was such a good choice for the main role, his performance was fantastic, and so was Dan Fogler's as the funny sidekick character. It's just so nice that the movie didn't suck because I'm the biggest Potterhead and it feels good to have a new movie in the series.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

thedaywalkerDec 31, 2016

Maintaining the magical components of the Harry Potter world and adding more creatures that i couldn't even imagine, and a great twist in the end, just was expecting more from some characters, but if you enjoyed the harry potter franchise,Maintaining the magical components of the Harry Potter world and adding more creatures that i couldn't even imagine, and a great twist in the end, just was expecting more from some characters, but if you enjoyed the harry potter franchise, you will certainly enjoy this movie… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryNov 23, 2016

Eddie Redmayne plays the slightly-eccentric Brit who travels to 20s New York with a suitcase full of magical creatures. Naturally, they escape and all manner of mayhem ensues. The visual effects are remarkable and the beasts are trulyEddie Redmayne plays the slightly-eccentric Brit who travels to 20s New York with a suitcase full of magical creatures. Naturally, they escape and all manner of mayhem ensues. The visual effects are remarkable and the beasts are truly fantastic. On the other hand, the story isn't especially inventive and the direction lacks personality. Even Redmayne resorts to the gawky, awkward style that's often apparent in his work. While there are clever moments and a few mildly enjoyable characters, it's just a noisy, jumbled disarray by the end. The overall effect is visually dazzling and fun to watch, but not especially captivating on a human level.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

TokyochuchuDec 6, 2016

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is an excellent first chapter in the Harry Potter spin off. It immediately lurches towards the darker aspects of the later potter movies, whilst still maintaining some giddy fun of new discovery. TheFantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is an excellent first chapter in the Harry Potter spin off. It immediately lurches towards the darker aspects of the later potter movies, whilst still maintaining some giddy fun of new discovery. The world building is great and in general, this is a much more satisfying movie than the early Potter films. Great stuff!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

imthenoobNov 23, 2016

It's great to jump back into the series after a few years absence. Really enjoyed the main cast, Specifically Farrell and Redmayne. Shout out to Dan Fogler, He gave a much better performance than I expected and really had a lovable character.It's great to jump back into the series after a few years absence. Really enjoyed the main cast, Specifically Farrell and Redmayne. Shout out to Dan Fogler, He gave a much better performance than I expected and really had a lovable character. I thought Ezra Miller was by far the weakest part of the cast, Mainly due to how his character was written and not acted. Plot wise is was a little bit basic but there was enough action and plot twists to keep you interested in for the full run time. It's a very beautiful and well directed/edited film. I wish they tried more variety among spell use rather than the same 3-4 spells over and over again but that's just me.

Overall, I really enjoyed it. I had no real issue with the movie and can't wait to see the second one. Certainly lived up to expectations as a spin off and more than lived up to the hype.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

TimW001Nov 25, 2016

The first half of this movie moves at a very slow pace with no music or rhythm. The first half is quite boring. The second is a lot of fun and adventure. With a great climax to the movie as well. If you're a fan of the Harry Potter series youThe first half of this movie moves at a very slow pace with no music or rhythm. The first half is quite boring. The second is a lot of fun and adventure. With a great climax to the movie as well. If you're a fan of the Harry Potter series you will love this film, but otherwise it may not be worth seeing.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

marcmyworksNov 22, 2016

Fantastic Beasts is a thrill ride full of monster, witches, wizards and the American laws of magic. Inspired by JK Rowling's book of the same name, this is more of a North American based prequel of the Harry Potter films, and though it startsFantastic Beasts is a thrill ride full of monster, witches, wizards and the American laws of magic. Inspired by JK Rowling's book of the same name, this is more of a North American based prequel of the Harry Potter films, and though it starts slow it builds into a wonderfully complex movie filled with themes of politics and animal rescue. Eddie Redmayne is wonderful as the awkward Newt as is Dan Fogler who plays his No-Maj (human) friend Jacob.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

43in2014Nov 23, 2016

Related media: I have watched all of the previous seven Harry Potter films but have not read any of the books, including the Fantastic Beasts book.

What's it like?: It's like the first Harry Potter film, where they introduce the World ofRelated media: I have watched all of the previous seven Harry Potter films but have not read any of the books, including the Fantastic Beasts book.

What's it like?: It's like the first Harry Potter film, where they introduce the World of Wizardry, its magic, human characters and animals, combined with the horrifying world of witch-hunting in the old US of A.

Pros:
1) As promised by the title, there are some fantastic beasts! 2) The film also brings the world of Harry Potter, its magic, human characters and animals, back into our consciousness again, but it is going in a totally different direction, and that is interesting and original.

Cons:
1) The obvious villain in the film, a very destructive force, could be better presented towards the end of the film. As in Alien and Jaws, less is more. There was too much of it in the film, yet it felt insufficiently explained. This part here could be shortened by few minutes. (Note: There is a less obvious villain in the film.)
3) Johnny Depp's casting in this film felt like an attempt to promote his flagging career.

How would the the different age groups rate it?
Children: (The film is not rated for children.)
Teens: Excellent
Young adults: Good
Medium age adults: Good
Old adults: Good

Rating: 4/5 (no half scores). It is worth spending your money and watching it in the cinemas.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

adpirtleNov 28, 2016

FBaWtFT is as good as a film based on a spin-off novella written for charity has any right to be, and better than the ninth film in any franchise should be expected to be. It's got all the wonder and none of the bad child-acting of theFBaWtFT is as good as a film based on a spin-off novella written for charity has any right to be, and better than the ninth film in any franchise should be expected to be. It's got all the wonder and none of the bad child-acting of the original Harry Potter films. What more can be said than that?… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

DBPirate1129Nov 25, 2016

Fantastic Beasts is an absolute blast and a great opener to this new story in the Wizarding World. It has all the magic of the Harry Potter franchise, while at the same time bringing in new elements and standing on its own without relying tooFantastic Beasts is an absolute blast and a great opener to this new story in the Wizarding World. It has all the magic of the Harry Potter franchise, while at the same time bringing in new elements and standing on its own without relying too much on nostalgia or the previous entries. I don't want to spoil too much but this film was much darker than I was expecting. This is definitely a more mature version of J.K. Rowling's universe. The acting is fantastic. Eddie Redmayne as Newt was a great choice but I would say the standout is probably Colin Farrell as Percival Graves. He stole every scene he was in. Fantastic Beasts is full to the brim with imagination. It truly shows how many tricks Rowling still has up her sleeve. It's pretty impressive how her first screenplay/film is already up to par with her extremely innovative book series. This is definitely not like other prequels when it comes to substance. It's original, it's complex, and it's engaging. And I say that as someone who liked the Star Wars prequels.

Unfortunately, since I'm not an official critic, I can only give scores out of 10 but if I could give scores out of 100, this would be a 96. For Harry Potter fans, this probably ranks somewhere in between 3rd and 4th place out of all the films. For me, that'd be between Prisoner of Azkaban and Half-Blood Prince.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

fool0117Nov 21, 2016

A pleasent revisit to the universe that JK Rowling created. I only wish they would have spent more time on character development than story. I can't wait to see more.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

tethysdustNov 24, 2016

I was not expecting much, since this is a kind of prequel to Harry Potter based on a fictional textbook. However, J.K. Rowling really did not drop the ball here. I love how she has brought the US wizarding world to life, taking into accountI was not expecting much, since this is a kind of prequel to Harry Potter based on a fictional textbook. However, J.K. Rowling really did not drop the ball here. I love how she has brought the US wizarding world to life, taking into account a variety of real-life cultural differences between the US and the UK. There's a lot of imagination and a lot going on in this story, all while it introduces us to a new cast of interesting characters. I liked that the No-Maj character is not simply comic relief (though he is pretty funny).… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

RobBob99Nov 27, 2016

A solid start to this new franchise, the World Building and establishing the Wizarding World in America was the most dynamic part of this film. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a weird movie to judge, there wasn't anything exceptional about theA solid start to this new franchise, the World Building and establishing the Wizarding World in America was the most dynamic part of this film. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a weird movie to judge, there wasn't anything exceptional about the movie, at the same time there wasn't anything bad about it either. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a fun movie with two solid performances from Eddie Redmayne and Colin Farrell.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

TLHGNov 24, 2016

THIS IS A BETTER GHOSTBUSTERS REBOOT THAN WE SAW EARLIER THIS YEAR! This movie is a fantastic experience and got me excited about all the other cool and curious ideas that J.K. can pull out of her hat! The main character is very charming andTHIS IS A BETTER GHOSTBUSTERS REBOOT THAN WE SAW EARLIER THIS YEAR! This movie is a fantastic experience and got me excited about all the other cool and curious ideas that J.K. can pull out of her hat! The main character is very charming and weird, awesome to see him dealing with this crazy creatures haunting New York city! The main villains are great and it seems that their arc was just set up in this movie and probably we will learn more about them in the future! Oh and the soundtrack -> it is not John Williams, but is just as good!
Now there are four flaws that I found with this flick and, although the final assemble of everything is great, this things do get annoying at some points: (1) CGI in this movie is really in your face, very easy to spot, very distracting, this movie required a better work; (2) lack of creativity with the creatures, there some amazing ones, but most are quite random and could be pokemons just as much; (3) some very important characters (mostly Porpentina, but not only) are so lifeless it feels like they came from the Twilight movies; and, (4)it is impossible to avoid comparing with the HP movies and, I don't know if it is the characters or if it is America, or the whole blend of things, but Fantastic Beasts... is just so much less charming than any of the HP movies that, if they don't correct the course for the next ones, setting up this series is just not worth it. Despite these things, it is a great movie and I loved it both as a HP and as a Ghostbusters fan =P… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

masamunerikuNov 25, 2016

Fantastic beasts is a movie that tries to be several things at once. It tells the story about catching beasts and about the wizardry world in the US. Even though it manages to do both it does not excel at one.

The disparate story between theFantastic beasts is a movie that tries to be several things at once. It tells the story about catching beasts and about the wizardry world in the US. Even though it manages to do both it does not excel at one.

The disparate story between the two aspects results in uneven pacing in the storytelling. The first half focuses on the beast catching while the rest is about the issues surrounding the world of US wizardry. In the end none is completely fleshed out.

This movie is also heavily character driven due to the light plot. The characters in the movie are hit-or-misses. Some may like them while other may find the main characters to be ditzy and at times *oblivious*. The villains feel cookie-cutter and superficial as the story never dives deeper into them. The movie is a treat for HP fans as it expands the HP universe complete with references to original HP world. Others who find the characters likable and enjoy a light plot on wizards and imaginary beasts will find it worth the admission and time.

---
In my opinion they should've made Fantastic Beasts as a TV series focusing on 'beasts' while the story on US wizardry world should be a standalone movie with a more substantial plot.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

VadertimeNov 28, 2016

So, we went and saw the movie on the second weekend of it's release, due to timing. This was a different movie than the Harry Potter series, less dark and more optimistic. With Harry Potter one had the overwhelming presence of Lord Vordemort.So, we went and saw the movie on the second weekend of it's release, due to timing. This was a different movie than the Harry Potter series, less dark and more optimistic. With Harry Potter one had the overwhelming presence of Lord Vordemort. Here, it was more free-form and almost to the point of frivolous enjoyment.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

alejandro970Nov 27, 2016

From the universe of Harry Potter, a spin-off that fulfill the expectations of fanboys with own magic, witty dose of british humor and charming roles, specially Redmayne.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

MalifixNov 28, 2016

The movie was a great opening to new characters in a familiar world. There are lines dropped about characters we know, but this film provides lots of fresh material in the wizarding world we are used to.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

Maggie0908hsuDec 2, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There're endless possibilities for JK Rowling and her magic world. I do love them, while this movie should be about the beasts, but in fact it spent too much time on dark magic. When the dark shadows came out, I just couldn't help think of the movie "Mama".… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

bfoore90May 20, 2017

Set in JK Rowling's magical world of witchcraft and wizardry, I wasn't expecting much from this movie as I'm not the biggest Harry Potter fan but nonetheless this movie certainly tops my list as one of the best of 2016. In an attempt toSet in JK Rowling's magical world of witchcraft and wizardry, I wasn't expecting much from this movie as I'm not the biggest Harry Potter fan but nonetheless this movie certainly tops my list as one of the best of 2016. In an attempt to expand the world of Harry Potter, Fantastic Beasts introduces us to Newt Scamander, an employee of the Ministry of Magic who travels to 1920's New York en route to Arizona but gets stuck there when chaos ensues and he has to recapture his mystical creatures that accidentally escape from his briefcase. This film does a good job of handling action, magic and at the same time staying grounded and not doing too much too soon with it's material. There is a really good foundation here to build on with good characters to build off of in this movie, it also carries a sense of magical wonder you come to expect from these movies.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

MamoshaNov 18, 2016

U know guys I hope in future we will have law about cooruptibility rewievs of "critics" cause this movie are really good, actors really nice played, we have a little long scenes near ending of this movie but it is really good and a think itU know guys I hope in future we will have law about cooruptibility rewievs of "critics" cause this movie are really good, actors really nice played, we have a little long scenes near ending of this movie but it is really good and a think it is one of the best movie of 2016 year. I am not Harry Potter fan i just wana to throw to jail this critics who many time write their review for money cause many computer games and many movies unfairly overestimated or underestimated. Why we need normal law about this? Сause it concerns the service sector and when I come to cafe and waiter advises and give me bad launch i dont wana pay for it and i take my money back and waiter have problem with authority. I hope many ppl understood me.… Expand

11 of 24 users found this helpful1113

All this user's reviews

10

grinfinoriaNov 18, 2016

But once, JK Rowling showing that he is one of the most creative and ingenious people at the time of creating history, the film is totally competent to take the name "History derived from Harry Potter" along with it, the story is very wellBut once, JK Rowling showing that he is one of the most creative and ingenious people at the time of creating history, the film is totally competent to take the name "History derived from Harry Potter" along with it, the story is very well thought out , With insane effects and a very amazing script, well-scaled actors and everything else, one of the best films of the decade!… Expand

11 of 25 users found this helpful1114

All this user's reviews

8

Iky009Nov 21, 2016

It already starts off with the iconic soundtrack that enshrined all the Harry Potter films. Now what about Fantastic Beasts ?, Well this is easy, it's a great movie, I swore it would be more of a '' The Hobbit '' but I fiercely burned myIt already starts off with the iconic soundtrack that enshrined all the Harry Potter films. Now what about Fantastic Beasts ?, Well this is easy, it's a great movie, I swore it would be more of a '' The Hobbit '' but I fiercely burned my tongue. With a beautiful soundtrack, impeccable art direction and great visual effects, it's a movie that will win all Harry Potter fans, not by playing in the same world of the eternal wizard, but by carrying the same familiar essence of his films, and Without Johnny Depp (who was strongly criticized) who even appearing for a few minutes, steals the scene and shows that he could be a great villain.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

MattyiceNov 30, 2016

While Fantastic Beasts does not capture the entire magic of the Harry Potter movies, it does get a lot of things right. The effects and beasts themselves are great. The acting is solid, despite the characters not being completely likable.While Fantastic Beasts does not capture the entire magic of the Harry Potter movies, it does get a lot of things right. The effects and beasts themselves are great. The acting is solid, despite the characters not being completely likable. However, the strongest aspect of the film is its early 20th century New York setting, which is lively and, for the lack of a better word, fantastic. Despite these pros, the film drags a bit in the middle and its subplots are rather forced and confusing. In the end, though, Fantastic Beasts is a solid spinoff of the widely successful Potter movie series.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

angelsanzcorreaNov 24, 2016

Heartwarming, fun, engrossing, absorbing, with mysterious yet lovable characters (as most fantasy movies should be) but slightly naïve and with a predictable plot.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

8

shoulderoforionNov 23, 2016

What a great grown up Wizarding world movie, I'm not a Potterhead, but liked the books & movies ... this gives me, more of that, plus I really really liked the characters. Not the same as HP, but different in a great way. Look forward to more.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

Bigchris27Nov 29, 2016

OK I had to see this movie as soon as I heard about it and I gotta say that I had a blast watching the movie it had charm good plot loveable characters and action packed fun I kinda fell in love with chassity she was hilarious and adorable goOK I had to see this movie as soon as I heard about it and I gotta say that I had a blast watching the movie it had charm good plot loveable characters and action packed fun I kinda fell in love with chassity she was hilarious and adorable go see this wonderful movie this holiday season you won't be sorry take the tweens Along with you have a good night at the movies… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

madmoviemanNov 29, 2016

This film is so good until it really isn’t. I’m not a Harry Potter die-hard, but I can say that, for the most part, Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them is a near-perfect series opener for this spin-off franchise to the Harry PotterThis film is so good until it really isn’t. I’m not a Harry Potter die-hard, but I can say that, for the most part, Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them is a near-perfect series opener for this spin-off franchise to the Harry Potter series. For over an hour and a half, it’s a film filled with glee, humour and imagination, as well as brains, strong directing and acting, and visuals, something that I absolutely loved until its crushingly disappointing final act, putting a real taint on the film as a whole.

But before I get into that, let’s talk about how this film works in comparison to the Harry Potter series. Thankfully, this film takes an almost totally different direction. With only hints and references to things we all know and love, this is a completely separate world and story from Hogwarts at the turn of the 21st Century, something that I was utterly delighted to see, as it allowed not only for more unpredictability and excitement in this film alone, but also opens up an endless world of possibilities for the films ahead.

Of course, we know that we’ll be getting many Fantastic Beasts sequels in the future, but I’m glad to say that this is a fantastic footing to start the franchise from. Despite the return of director David Yates from the last four Harry Potter films, the film has a distinctly different atmosphere in all ways from those movies. Save for one side plot, the film is wonderfully light-hearted, full of bright colours, and has a wide array of funny, energetic and interesting characters.

Because of that, I was smiling and having a great time for the first two acts of this movie. David Yates does an excellent job at confidently giving the film that vibe, whilst J.K. Rowling’s script isn’t just an entertaining adventure, but also features some intriguing elements about the wider context of the wizarding world in 1920s NYC, leaving the door open for a fascinating story arc.

Also, the performances here are excellent. Every one of the lead actors is brilliant from start to finish, adding to the film’s wonderful vibrancy and imagination. Redmayne, Waterston, Dan Fogler and Alison Sudol are a dynamite leading quartet, all with fantastic chemistry at every moment, reminiscent of the good old days from The Philosopher’s Stone where Harry, Ron and Hermione were all having fun and adventures, something that relit the joy in my heart that was missing in the later films of the Harry Potter series.

In short, there’s so much to love and enjoy about Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them, right up until its final act.

In a few seconds, the film switches from a bright and imaginative adventure to the most generic and dull blockbuster climax you can imagine. Apart from the genuinely painful overload of CGI throughout (there are moments when you can see nothing but it on screen), the story takes a dive, losing the camaraderie and intelligence of the earlier acts, in exchange for a city destruction sequence against a cloud of metal.

Whilst the final few minutes return the film to its earlier glory, the entire final act felt like it dragged on for an eternity, adding very little to both this film’s story and options for the future, showcasing loud, brash and boring action again and again. Having been so enchanted by this new world for so long, I was absolutely crushed by the final act’s disappointment, but I hope that it can be recognised as a simple fix for future films.

Overall, I really enjoyed the majority of this film. Imaginative, intelligent, bright and beautifully light-hearted, it’s a film that will warm your heart and put a smile on your face. Its strong directing, screenplay and acting all go a long way to making it even better, but it’s just the terrible disappointment of a final act that brings it all down a peg.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

OrwDec 10, 2016

This film makes you feel like a child. It's full of fantasy, and great characters. Eddie Redmayne is a perfect adition to the Harry Potter world. If you want something original and amazing, this movie is for you. I think it was wonderul.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

tsarouhasNov 21, 2016

The movie is so-so. The visuals were very pleasing (as expected) but the story is one huge mess...Nothing really happened. Don't expect action in this one

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

Legoguy6100Nov 29, 2016

As a huge fan of the Harry Potter movies, I was absolutely blown away by this film. From the nostalgic opening titles and classic score to the stunning visuals, this film more then exceeded the hype and expectations surrounding it, prior toAs a huge fan of the Harry Potter movies, I was absolutely blown away by this film. From the nostalgic opening titles and classic score to the stunning visuals, this film more then exceeded the hype and expectations surrounding it, prior to its release. Like every film, this one had it's problems, including recycled elements from the original Harry Potter movies. These factors include an overly abusive adoptive family (physically and mentally) as well as constant visits to an orphanage. These two factors were unnecessary- but didn't take too much time away from the mysterious marvel that was the rest of the film. A lot of things were cut out of the movie, as expected from a film from a series like this. The words "I want to be a wizard" were never said. Newt never stops in front of the police offers and says "You have absolutely nothing to worry about." The scene in which Newt stands on a roof top in daylight with two others next to him? Never shown. All complaints aside, this is one of the best movies I've seen in a while. This film was at the top of my list for most anticipated films for the year- and it didn't disappoint. This is truly a flick that will satisfy long-time fans of the Wizarding World, as well as welcome viewers to the incredible universe.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

DirigiblePulpDec 17, 2016

There's some really good world-building in this film. America in the 1920's? Absolutely brilliant what is done with it. It feels like a very organic extension of the Harry Potter universe; like it has always been this way and we are peekingThere's some really good world-building in this film. America in the 1920's? Absolutely brilliant what is done with it. It feels like a very organic extension of the Harry Potter universe; like it has always been this way and we are peeking back in time in a fictional universe (and not like a different universe altogether, or just shameless fandom branding).

However the plot leaves a lot to be desired. The "Fantastic Beasts" wrapper doesn't wind up nearly as exciting as the world around it. It's a very basic fetch quest type story that merely serves to introduce new characters and places and things; it also serves to dumb-down and grind the interesting stuff to a halt. The action scenes aren't great -- choppy, bad CGI, mindlessness (though not the mating dance which was a real delight) -- they go on a tad too long and don't add much overall.

Rowling clearly knows what she's doing, yet for some reason resorted to a paint-by-numbers plot to get her points across. Maybe it was studio interference (albeit only for the first film, to re-introduce things in a simple way) or maybe all the good stuff is being saved for later (ugh, world-building).

Sorcerer's Stone used a fairly simple plot to build a world, yet it felt like an organic extension of what we were seeing and how it was being shaped and presented to us. Here it feels cheap, unfinished and of two disparate ideas.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

TheQuietGamerMay 5, 2017

Fantastic Beasts welcomes us back into the world of Harry Potter. This time though we aren't at Hogwarts and we are following an entirely new cast of characters, in a different time period, and a different part of the world. The movie does aFantastic Beasts welcomes us back into the world of Harry Potter. This time though we aren't at Hogwarts and we are following an entirely new cast of characters, in a different time period, and a different part of the world. The movie does a great job of expanding the scale and lore of the Rowling's universe on the big screen. Most importantly though, Fantastic Beasts brings back that sense of fun that had been missing from the movies since The Goblet of Fire. The new setting and it's unique twists on wizardry rules ensure that Fantastic Beasts is new and fresh enough to ensure that this isn't just a retread, but familiar enough to tap back into that sense of amazement and wonder we felt way back in 2001 when The Sorcerer's Stone first came out. The new cast is just as endearing as the old, only in different ways. Each new character feels distinct enough to carve new paths in our hearts. Each is excellently portrayed and written. The same can't be said for the supporting cast. They are all talented actors playing interesting characters, but the film puts most of it's intention on it's main heroes. Not a bad move, but it left me wanting just a little bit more from the side of the world.

The plot is also a sparse. The majority of it is going on in the background. Instead the majority of what we're watching is Newt and his new friends chase spectacular magical creatures. It's still entertaining, but the main conflict suffers as a result. We can clearly see who the villain is, but he doesn't get much screen time. Of course I can't complain too much about this. With so many of the later Harry Potter movies being something of a drag due to how dark things got, I appreciate this more lighthearted affair and there are still more serious things going on behind the scenes.

This new tale in Harry Potter universe feels like a fresh new start. It hearkens back to glory days of the Harry Potter movies. It stumbles a bit with it's writing and world-building, but all of that can be forgiven because Fantastic Beasts reminded me why I fell in love with these movies all those years ago. It's a brand new adventure with that recognizable magic and original feel.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

evokingsMay 29, 2017

the movie was well done, but I feel there is no connection to harry potter universe, to be fair maybe a few names and spells from that universe creep in, this movie feels like it take place in the past background of the harry potter universe,the movie was well done, but I feel there is no connection to harry potter universe, to be fair maybe a few names and spells from that universe creep in, this movie feels like it take place in the past background of the harry potter universe, the movie is a bit long at bits i felt honestly like it was not explaining itself enough but it eventually explains the story to you, but the movie makes you wait for the back story to present itself, it feels vary JK Rowling-esque the movie is good, but nothing special the whole movie as a whole is a good watch.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Jim222001Jun 15, 2017

The film is magical and "Fantastic" despite being over-stuffed and draggy. The chemistry between Dan Fogler and Alison Sudol to me is what made the film truly great. Fogler who usually plays the same loud mouth in comedies, really shines hereThe film is magical and "Fantastic" despite being over-stuffed and draggy. The chemistry between Dan Fogler and Alison Sudol to me is what made the film truly great. Fogler who usually plays the same loud mouth in comedies, really shines here as a muggle dragged in the magical world. However Sudol's Queenie who can read minds probably gives the most magical performance in the movie.
Anyone whining that the film isn't exactly what they wanted, I don't understand. The film is a magical delight, what else did you expect it to be ?… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Jess_HillNov 21, 2016

This is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. TheThis is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. The performances are considered and generally polished, with Redmayne excellent as is to be expected. Definitely one for older children, this was better than I was expecting. 7.86/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

hannah132016Dec 8, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The film is just amazing, with stunning, sets visuals and plot. My favorite character is Jacob the no-mag. Definitely worth paying the admission, it was so amazing that I was left speechless at the end. I love the fact that it has some resemblance to the Harry Potter. I loved how Newts case has lots of dimensions. My favorite beast was the Niffler, I thought it was really quite cute. However it isn't really like the Harry Potter movies, which I think is a good thing because it gives HP fans a chance to see something different by J.K Rowling, with some different actors too. I thought Eddie was the perfect choice for Newt. I loved Dan Fogler too! The film was the best film I have ever seen, I cant wait for the second film. Very developed, worth seeing, definitely entertaining from start to finish.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

VirgonoShakaDec 10, 2016

As a big Harry Potter fan in my teenage years, I wasn't sure where to stand in my expectations of this movie. I was hopeful it was going to be good, but was cautious about being too exited, mostly because Harry Potter has lost some of itsAs a big Harry Potter fan in my teenage years, I wasn't sure where to stand in my expectations of this movie. I was hopeful it was going to be good, but was cautious about being too exited, mostly because Harry Potter has lost some of its shine in this stage of my life. But to be honest, I was very pleasently surprised by this movie. It expands in one of the things I always wanted to see more in Harry Potter, the world, and it ends up being the best character of the movie, because you see that outside of Hogwarts there is more to be found and it can be very intersting, charming, and wondrous all in its own. Add to it nice designs for the creatures, excellent music, good mystery, and you have a winning start to a new movie saga. Hopefully the world, the places, and the story continues to impress in the next chapters.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MyDistUniverseDec 26, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I am the first to admit that I was sceptical about the movie Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them. How could you make a movie about the world of Harry Potter without Harry Potter? I needn't have been worried. Clearly, J.K. Rowling knows what she is doing. In a departure from the conventional first writing the story in form of a novel, she skipped a step and went on straight to writing the screenplay instead. With an incredible movie as a result.

The story is about Newt Scamander. Newt is a British wizard who comes to New York in the 1920s. In his possession he has a suitcase filled with magical creatures. He has collected those fantastic beasts all over the world and stopped over in America to release the Thunderbird into the wild to be with other creatures of its kind. After that he is on his way back home to write a book about the fantastic beasts and where to find them. Or so he thought.

A chance encounter with ‘no-maj’ Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler) leads to a mix up of their suitcases and ultimately results in some of the creatures getting out. When he meets Newt, a strange new chapter in his life starts.

Trouble brews in form of Percival Graves (Colin Farrell), a powerful wizard and the Director of Security at MACUSA. He appears to have an agenda of his own, which is not quite clear as of yet. But he does meet Credence, a teenage boy and one of Mary Lou’s adopted children in some back alleys to task him with finding a child witch who supposedly possesses unimaginable powers.

The events take the group of new friends all across New York in an effort to catch the escaped creatures and to return them to the magical world Newt has created in his suitcase for them,

The story ends in an epic show down wizard style, with grown men waving their wands like it’s no ones business. There are sparks flying and buildings crumbling.

The CGI effects throughout the movie are spectacular. I highly recommend watching the movie in 3D. The creatures and their world look incredibly real and close enough to touch. It is rather fascinating to watch a tiny little blue insect flapping its wings right in front of your nose.

The story itself is thought provoking and beautiful. It touches on the age old subject of comparing people of different backgrounds against each other. People who lead different lives and people who have different abilities. Who is right and who is wrong. Who is better and who is not. And how do they treat the creatures around them?

Similarities with today’s society is clearly visible to anyone willing to look passed the story of wizardry and transfers the values into the everyday life of the modern world.

We can all learn something from a suitcase full of magical creatures.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

manningn15Nov 21, 2018

I loved the Harry Potter franchise and this spin-off is amazing. The visual effects were spectacular. The story and plot were fantastic. The creatures were all cool, creepy, and cute. The cast gave stupendous performances especially EddieI loved the Harry Potter franchise and this spin-off is amazing. The visual effects were spectacular. The story and plot were fantastic. The creatures were all cool, creepy, and cute. The cast gave stupendous performances especially Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol, Colin Farrell, Ezra Miller, and Carmen Ejogo. The soundtrack was also great. A+.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

nateOstrikeJan 13, 2018

How did I miss this one in the cinema? It is the best Harry Potter movie of them all on my opinion. Great actors, good story, wonderful imagination and creatures and nothing crude or foul. I enjoyed this movie a lot and I really hope anotherHow did I miss this one in the cinema? It is the best Harry Potter movie of them all on my opinion. Great actors, good story, wonderful imagination and creatures and nothing crude or foul. I enjoyed this movie a lot and I really hope another one comes out with Depp in it and all the others. Well done.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

luke100Jan 11, 2018

The plot is really stupid sometimes, and the subplot of magical creatures feels a bit forced, but it's characters and themes are captivating, and the visuals keep your eyes glued to the screen. It's not perfect, but it has me hugely excitedThe plot is really stupid sometimes, and the subplot of magical creatures feels a bit forced, but it's characters and themes are captivating, and the visuals keep your eyes glued to the screen. It's not perfect, but it has me hugely excited for the sequels.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(83/100)
I very much liked this new step into another side of the Harry Potter world!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Kdog152Jan 3, 2023

All the magic of the Harry Potter series, but with different characters and based 50 years before the events of the philosophers stone. I love the small Easter eggs and other small details in this film as well, especially the little deathlyAll the magic of the Harry Potter series, but with different characters and based 50 years before the events of the philosophers stone. I love the small Easter eggs and other small details in this film as well, especially the little deathly hallows symbol Easter egg. Really great movie from the amazing series brought to us by the legend who is JK Rowling and whoever the producers are.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Tss5078Nov 28, 2016

J.K. Rowling may have ended the Harry Potter series, but she isn't done writing about her magical world. Her latest series Fantastic Beasts has finally hit theaters, with the first of what will be a five film series, that starts off a hundredJ.K. Rowling may have ended the Harry Potter series, but she isn't done writing about her magical world. Her latest series Fantastic Beasts has finally hit theaters, with the first of what will be a five film series, that starts off a hundred years before Harry Potter stepped into Hogwarts. The film is centered on Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), who has come to New York City as part of his quest to save the endangered species of the magical world. These creatures live in what appears to be a suitcase, but when some of them escape and a muggle is exposed to Scamander's attempts to retrieve them, he finds himself in a world of trouble. Scamander's only salvation is that with another unknown creature and a dark wizard on the loose, there are other things to worry about, so he is sent with an agent (Katherine Waterston), and the muggle, to collect his creatures and to try to help figure out what is going on. Even though this movie takes place a hundred years before Harry Potter the special effects and especially the CGI on all the creatures involved is amazing! Even if I watched this film without the sound on, I'd still be blown away by how visually impactful it is. As for it's star, they cast one of the biggest up and comers in Hollywood, Eddie Redmayne, and he is perfect for the role. Redmayne is exactly like Harry and the kind of character Rowling loves to write about. He's this geeky, skinny, soft spoken, lovable loser, that no one would expect to be perhaps a hero in waiting. Aside from some corny jokes thrown in for the kids and die hard Potter fans, this movie was absolutely fantastic and I can't wait to see where it goes next. Rowling has stated that the other films will focus on other characters, including a younger Dumbledore, which I'm a bit indifferent to. I really liked this film, and I am curious to know what would be the point in a sequel that starts over. I'd imagine it would be to introduce everyone and then bring them all together in the end, but no matter what they do, the producers will be hard pressed to out due this film.… Expand