Paramount Pictures | Release Date: December 22, 2017
5.3
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 228 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
74
Mixed:
97
Negative:
57
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
2
qamasterMar 21, 2018
An interesting idea, but very badly incarnate. A lot of unnecessary scenes, superfluous words. Events are unnecessarily long. The semantic part of the film is vaguely expressed, although the authors had more than enough possibilities forAn interesting idea, but very badly incarnate. A lot of unnecessary scenes, superfluous words. Events are unnecessarily long. The semantic part of the film is vaguely expressed, although the authors had more than enough possibilities for this. Equally frustrating is the director's work. many scenes look ridiculous and unnatural Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
5
Rebecca31Jan 28, 2018
The most notable thing about Downsizing was I laughed a lot more than I ever expected to. I'm not about to urge you all to rush out and see this one. For one thing the trailer painted a slightly different picture than the one you end upThe most notable thing about Downsizing was I laughed a lot more than I ever expected to. I'm not about to urge you all to rush out and see this one. For one thing the trailer painted a slightly different picture than the one you end up getting. Not only that but there are a number of scenes that don't appear in the film at all. When a trailer about a topic as weird as this features a scene involving people 5 inches tall drinking out of a massive bottle of vodka and then doesn't appear in the film you can't help but notice that. It's not the best movie you'll see all year but it's so quirky and out there that you'll enjoy it in the moment and might even get some laughs out of it, I know I did.

In a world where overpopulation is an issue the only feasible solution apparently is to undergo a permanent procedure called downsizing. This will greatly benefit the environment etc but more importantly your money will get you a lot more so you can afford to live like millionaires in a little perfect town and a huge house. Matt Damon fed up with his life, experiencing money problems and unable to afford a house decides the best option for him and his wife is to downsize and live the life they've always wanted. Well things don't go according to plan for poor Matt Damon and that's about the point where the movie decides to take a sharp turn in another direction. I wasn't relishing the idea of seeing a depressed mini Matt Damon for 2 hours 15 minutes so the introduction of Christoph Waltz and Hong Chau was exactly what the story needed. So although I feel the second half of the movie differs so much in tone it does feel like you're watching a whole new movie I enjoyed Downsizing for the most part. For all its problems and lack of focus it makes up for it with unexpected and random bursts of hilarity. Not the easiest rating I've ever given, I didn't love it but I didn't hate it. A great idea, with a very good script so I can't help but feel like it should have been better. Recommended if you're looking for something a little bit different.
Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
3
The3AcademySinsDec 25, 2018
Downsizing takes an interesting premise and turns it into one of the most boring, plodding blunders I have ever seen. The pacing of this movie is all over the place. Some scenes fly by so quickly you cannot understand what is happening, andDownsizing takes an interesting premise and turns it into one of the most boring, plodding blunders I have ever seen. The pacing of this movie is all over the place. Some scenes fly by so quickly you cannot understand what is happening, and others go by so slowly that you wonder when the movie will end. The movie is very liberal with scenes accompanied by music in which nothing happens. In an attempt to be artsy, these scenes come off as nothing more than poorly disguised attempts to pad the run time.

The script is hit-or-miss at best and asinine at worst. Matt Damon does his best to give an honest performance, and he and Christoph Waltz are the only watchable parts of the movie. Downsizing is just a giant let down.
Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
4
pirMar 2, 2018
Unfortunately from a promising start this film devolved into a dull homily on "helping people is what matters". I could see so many promising avenues this could have explored based on the premise of shrinking people to lessen their impact onUnfortunately from a promising start this film devolved into a dull homily on "helping people is what matters". I could see so many promising avenues this could have explored based on the premise of shrinking people to lessen their impact on the environment, and it touches very lightly on a few of them (for example the inherent conflicts between the "smalls" and the "normals", the notion that repressive governments would use the technology in repressive ways, the problems of borders dealing with humans who come in pint size, the obvious issue that even in Leisure Land somebody needs to clean the toilets), but then it wastes time in a drug-induced trance, and loses its way entirely by meandering off into the original small colony in Norway reacting to a potential doomsday scenario that makes absolutely no sense (it does make sense to plan for it in the long run, but there's no reason at all for the darn hurry). Matt Damon is the most boring protagonist I can ever remember him being in any of his films, and even the always impressive Christoph Waltz and the bright newcomer Hong Chau couldn't pull the unfocused script back from the brink. I did like how Matt Damon's character came full circle (from taking care of his ailing mother at the start), that's a neat thematic viewpoint, but I really wanted this film to do a lot more with its premise and the big ideas that came with that. Heck, even just more of the interaction between tiny humans and the regular-sized world would have been more interesting, though that was the most superficial if funny aspect of the film. As usual, science fiction remains best left to actual science fiction writers. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
5
section20mi6Mar 20, 2018
What could've been an astounding social commentary piece ends up to be a multi-faceted disjointed disaster piece. Downsizing focuses on the good Samaritan character Paul Safranek as he ventures the downsized world with some realizations andWhat could've been an astounding social commentary piece ends up to be a multi-faceted disjointed disaster piece. Downsizing focuses on the good Samaritan character Paul Safranek as he ventures the downsized world with some realizations and disappointments without delving into any of the important societal issues, but simply stating them and moving into cliche stories of characters. Payne misses the mark with the great cast and occasional humor, ultimately dooming Downsizing the chance to become politically important. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
TVJerryJan 4, 2018
In order to extend our planet's life span, a technique is invented that shrinks people down to 5", so their energy usage and waste is greatly reduced. Matt Damon plays the man caught in this tiny world after his wife abandons him. Once theIn order to extend our planet's life span, a technique is invented that shrinks people down to 5", so their energy usage and waste is greatly reduced. Matt Damon plays the man caught in this tiny world after his wife abandons him. Once the novelty of the small vs. large wears off, what's left is a forceful ecological lesson. Luckily, it includes his relationship with a Vietnamese woman (Hong Chau in a delightful and sometimes touching breakout performance). This adds a level of human responsibility and expands the message to compassion for one's fellow earthlings. There's virtually no humor, so what looks like it could be fun turns into a mildly involving drama and a heavy-handed tract on the foilables of human nature and the dangers of disregarding our planet's health. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
eagleeyevikingOct 19, 2018
While the first half of the film introduces plenty of interesting ideas, the second half fails to capitalize on those ideas, instead asking more vague questions that leaves a sense of confusion.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
muldjordOct 6, 2022
The movie is quite interesting all up to the point where they enter the tiny world (about 30 minutes in). Then it becomes a boring drama. I'd expected it to be a bit like "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids", but it is not - not even by a long shot.The movie is quite interesting all up to the point where they enter the tiny world (about 30 minutes in). Then it becomes a boring drama. I'd expected it to be a bit like "Honey, I Shrunk the Kids", but it is not - not even by a long shot.

You don't even know they are in a tiny world during most of the movie. They have everything from TV's to coffee machines and busses. And basically NONE of it looks "small". It's just an ordinary coffee machine and an ordinary TV.

I was interested in the tiny concept of the movie. But when that was removed, there was nothing left but a sluggish, sleep-inducing drama.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
peeteelee83Nov 26, 2018
The trailer does this movie a huge disservice. The trailer tries to sell this movie as a silly comedy, like Matt Damon's "Stuck On You." While the movie does have some silly, comedic bits, it's main focus is a satirical take on modernThe trailer does this movie a huge disservice. The trailer tries to sell this movie as a silly comedy, like Matt Damon's "Stuck On You." While the movie does have some silly, comedic bits, it's main focus is a satirical take on modern consumerism. If you go into the film expecting to be rolling on the floor laughing, you're going to be disappointed.
"Downsizing" is to modern 21st century mass consumerism as Voltaire's "Candide" was to 18th Century Leibnizian Optimism. Both works take the perspective of a generic everyman to illustrate the flaws in the times they live in and the mindset of the people around them. And in both works, the main character starts off seemingly indoctrinated by the world around them and proceeds to live through experiences that cause disillusionment. I won't spoil the ending, but if you didn't like "Candide," you're probably not going to like "Downsizing."
It's not a comedy. It's meant to be a thought-provoking, satirical commentary on rampant, self-destructive consumerism. It does an acceptable job at that, though if you go into the movie blind like I did, you'll endure about an hour and a half of "where is this movie going" confusion.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
sitebenderMar 26, 2019
Downsizing is a comedy that turns into a drama. By the end it felt more about how people jump on trends. Its tone becomes very disjointed as you descend from lightheartedness into end of the world stuff that never really feels like an actualDownsizing is a comedy that turns into a drama. By the end it felt more about how people jump on trends. Its tone becomes very disjointed as you descend from lightheartedness into end of the world stuff that never really feels like an actual problem in the movie. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
AWESOM-0Mar 8, 2020
I don’t get it, the negative reviews puzzle me. I really enjoyed this movie and I thought the performances were fantastic!
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
Poor_LenoJan 24, 2018
Really terrible film, recapping it to my friends made me realise how poor the overall plot was. Just a few things stuck together. The only good bit was when Paul took some drugs... honestly everything else was terrible.
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
5
CriticFerJan 11, 2018
Yeah, the movie is disappointing but i don't think is bad. It has good acting, good jokes, the Visuals Effects of the tiny people are ok and the music is decent but the way is handle, how's the writing and which direction is going is reallyYeah, the movie is disappointing but i don't think is bad. It has good acting, good jokes, the Visuals Effects of the tiny people are ok and the music is decent but the way is handle, how's the writing and which direction is going is really mediocre and is like the three acts are just changing the story. The idea is great, it would be better if the movie would be a satire sci-fic comedy-drama that could work, but it couldn't for the direction that Alexander Payne goes and also the writing of Jim Taylor and Alexander Payne. It could be better, but they waste the oportunnity, that's why is disappointing, even more disappointing than LEGO Ninjago. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
5
amheretojudgeJan 28, 2018
why did this happen..

Downsizing An idea isn't everything and this movie is a fine example of it. Yes, it has its heart in the center of it and has genuine effort in writing and direction but it completely fails on offering the audience
why did this happen..

Downsizing

An idea isn't everything and this movie is a fine example of it. Yes, it has its heart in the center of it and has genuine effort in writing and direction but it completely fails on offering the audience what they were promised. Surprisingly as we know, it has a premise of an animated feature and much like it, it is finely detailed as it had to create its own world (in a way) and this is the only note where the movie scores for these little amusing things are the only thing helping one survive this overlong script. Downsizing lacks a gripping screenplay, better editing, fast pacing and a particular palpable environment (it fluctuates a lot; the first act is completely different than the others, it doesn't quite fits in). Matt Damon and Christoph Waltz are equally good in it but surprisingly so is Hong Chau; she is perfect in her role. And in the end, Alexander Payne is the man responsible for all of it and as far his direction or execution is concerned he puts all his effort in each and every frame; one can completely see it, but on the writing part he fails to either surprise or entertain the audience. Downsizing is sweet and beautiful filled with hope (not for the viewers though) but has an overlong second act and a disappointing climax.
Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
3
SuncoastGuyJan 13, 2018
All over the place. It had 5 different major themes and should have focused much more.
8 of 12 users found this helpful84
All this user's reviews
5
MarcDoyleDec 3, 2017
The first third of this film is brilliant and hilarious stuff. It's most everything you see in the trailers. Unfortunately, it settles into much more mundane, tedious sequences which lack humor. The final few scenes are satisfying, butThe first third of this film is brilliant and hilarious stuff. It's most everything you see in the trailers. Unfortunately, it settles into much more mundane, tedious sequences which lack humor. The final few scenes are satisfying, but they're not enough to rescue the film. Damon is generally solid in his "every-man" role, and Wiig is great, though her role is brief. Incidentally, the funniest bit in the trailer - the tapping massive vodka bottle - didn't make the final cut, which is a bummer. Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
1
blackmagicmarkrJan 2, 2018
This film was terrible. It lures you in with an interesting premise that is completely exhausted and ignored roughly 30% of the way in. What you are left with, is one of the most contrived spectacles I have ever had the misfortune to sitThis film was terrible. It lures you in with an interesting premise that is completely exhausted and ignored roughly 30% of the way in. What you are left with, is one of the most contrived spectacles I have ever had the misfortune to sit through. It takes a major turn for the worse around the same time Kristin Wig takes her leave. The dialogue at times is so ridiculously silly, it is literally painful to watch. What I can’t undertstand is out of all the people involved with this film, not a one of them spoke up and said “hey, this doesn't make a damn bit of sense” or “hey, this is probably some of the dumbest dialogue in the history of cinema. Where is the accountability? Matt Damon is a great actor and will rebound, but unfortunately I will forever see him as the main in this complete waste of resources and time. The writer and director as well as the producers should collectively be ashamed of themselves and especially Damon, whom I believe to know better than this. Each ticket should come with a complimentary cyanide capsule. Expand
6 of 9 users found this helpful63
All this user's reviews
8
RedrealMay 7, 2019
Wow this movie is a sleeper hit in my opinion. I initially watched this out of boredom expecting something goofy and fun akin to Honey I Shrunk the Kids but this movie is so much more!
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
0
BroyaxDec 8, 2018
Ce film est un tour de force... en effet, comment peut-on avec un tel sujet passer complètement à côté de son sujet ?!... Avec des gens réduits à 12 ou 13 cm, on a pourtant tout un paquet de situations plus ou moins cocasses, voireCe film est un tour de force... en effet, comment peut-on avec un tel sujet passer complètement à côté de son sujet ?!... Avec des gens réduits à 12 ou 13 cm, on a pourtant tout un paquet de situations plus ou moins cocasses, voire dangereuses (!) que l'on pourrait imaginer !

Au lieu de ça, on nous démoule un film tarte, concon et neuneu, gnangnan et chiant... oui, tout ça à la fois ! c'est hallucinant de voir ça, surtout avec les effets spéciaux et les moyens dont dispose le cinéma hollywoodien d'aujourd'hui...

Je passe rapidement sur le problème "Matt Damon", car tourner avec "Matt Damon", c'est se coller un sacré boulet au pied, même en miniature. Il est mauvais et aussi charismatique qu'un balai à chiottes mais passons, car c'est ici le cadet des soucis de ce film.

On a donc jamais l'impression qu'ils soient **** puisqu'ils vivent tout comme les "grands" dans leur petit monde où tout est reproduit à l'identique ; ils sont toujours aussi cons, ce qui démontre que la connerie ne rapetisse pas, hélas. Le film nous bassine évidemment avec sa morale écologique à deux balles et glisse dans son agenda les migrants clandestins... c'est tout ce qu'il a pu tirer comme conséquences directes du "downsizing" à la mode : une migrante vietnamienne éclopée.

On passera aussi sur l'invraisemblance générale du film qui veut pourtant se la jouer "réaliste"... on a tout réduit pour nos super-nabots, y compris les animaux, les cigares, les médocs, et même les amphètes. Mais la marmotte, elle est où ? est-ce qu'elle emballe toujours le chocolat dans le papier alu ? répondez, les Français veulent savoir !

Et donc, aucun géant pour marcher sur ces petites colonies, aucun enfant hyperactif pour jouer avec ces petites marionnettes humaines ? personne pour tomber de la table ? non, non, juste du blabla pontifiant de merde pour un film tout petit qui ne mérite que la note la plus petite... disponible.
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
DubeauDec 25, 2017
Downsizing had a good idea. The story starts well and is funny until half of it. After that it's more a semi drama. I really loved the romance in the second half. It was funny and a bit more realistic then usual. The problem with this movieDownsizing had a good idea. The story starts well and is funny until half of it. After that it's more a semi drama. I really loved the romance in the second half. It was funny and a bit more realistic then usual. The problem with this movie is that there is not treat to their lives in general, while almost everything would try to eat or attack them. Even the most aseptic of environments has failures. In that sens the movie only display some political, ethical, religion views of the situation but with no real danger...I give it a 60% because this was a great idea but the story in itself isn't very realistic and somewhat boring. Great acting from all the actors, I especially loved those actors/actress around Matt Damon. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
0
HorpSmileFeb 26, 2018
Great idea. But its the worst film i've ever seen after "War Planet Apes". But unfortunately,i've spend 2 hours of my life on this...
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
1
wannabedirectorJan 3, 2018
The problem with Downsizing comes down to everything in the script. The dialogue is unnatural and makes the actors seem awful. The story is pretentious, cramming in 2 seconds worth of commentary on different kinds of "relevant" topics. TheThe problem with Downsizing comes down to everything in the script. The dialogue is unnatural and makes the actors seem awful. The story is pretentious, cramming in 2 seconds worth of commentary on different kinds of "relevant" topics. The only one that's important to the story is a "Save the Environment" message that's been done to death. The directing is on the level of an Adam Sandler film. The special effects are generic, the cinematography is uncreative, and the music makes me WANT blood to leak from my ears. I was hoping for something interesting in this movie, but all I found was a stupid, unamusing attempt at "meaningful" sci-fi. Expand
7 of 11 users found this helpful74
All this user's reviews
2
TheGreatestShowJan 4, 2018
I love Matt, but good gravy this movie was the most banal and boring movie I have ever sat through.
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
1
GreatGobblinJan 6, 2018
From The Bourne Identity to the The Boring Identity there is literally nothing redeeming about Damon or Downsizing aside from the basic concept. If you watch the trailer for this movie it promises you a fun, comedic jaunt about the trials andFrom The Bourne Identity to the The Boring Identity there is literally nothing redeeming about Damon or Downsizing aside from the basic concept. If you watch the trailer for this movie it promises you a fun, comedic jaunt about the trials and tribulations of being small in a big world. What you ended up with is a long-winded, boring guilt trip about being human and destroying the planet. I'm not sure how this movie was even listed as a comedy, as I can't recall a single laughable moment throughout the whole film. Everything from the storyline, to the dialogue, to the on-screen performances, felt like the cinematic equivalent of a valium induced coma. If you are considering seeing this movie, do yourself a favour, go down to the pet store, buy yourself a goldfish, and watch it swim around in its bowl for 2 hours. It will be far more entertaining and far less depressing. Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
3
shonuffsheffDec 27, 2017
One of the most uninteresting movies of the year. So much wasted potential and a pretty solid cast who just drag their feet through the whole thing ultimately accomplishing nothing.
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
0
francisrgoDec 24, 2017
For a critical acclaimed director, writer and producer, this film left me just puzzled and confused. There was no clear direction and the trailer essentially had nothing to do with the film! Matt Damon's performance was lackluster and justFor a critical acclaimed director, writer and producer, this film left me just puzzled and confused. There was no clear direction and the trailer essentially had nothing to do with the film! Matt Damon's performance was lackluster and just utter nonsense. And yeah sure, just let a Vietnamese-American actress play a stereotypical Vietnamese-American individual, nothing racist about that..... Downsizing is one of the worst film I've seen this year. I even prefer Jumanji over this. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
6
AcaciaDec 22, 2017
This movie is hard to describe. The premise is certainly interesting: miniaturizing people to save the planet. The first part of the movie is about the discovery of the process and the eventual selling of the concept as we see Paul (MattThis movie is hard to describe. The premise is certainly interesting: miniaturizing people to save the planet. The first part of the movie is about the discovery of the process and the eventual selling of the concept as we see Paul (Matt Damon) and wife Audrey getting the sales pitch for Leisure World, the place tou can live in a tiny mansion for a tiny amount of money. The next thing we see is Paul’s life in Leisure World and meet his obnoxious neighbor played by Christoph Waltz. At this point, the movie takes a left turn and becomes a whole different movie. And, we meet a Vetnamese woman (Hong Chau) who becomes an important character. There is het another plot twist before the end. At this point, it begins to sound like a ride at Epcot. Preachy and like a hippie love fest. It sort of lost me sometime around this part. It is entertaining, but not entirely enjoyable. It is too unfocused for my taste. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
10
VancomycinFeb 3, 2018
Plainly put, movies like this don't come around often enough. With a refreshingly adult take on the "Indian in the Cupboard" (and only marginally less-racist) this film will take you in for the entirety of it's runtime. Beautiful scenery, anPlainly put, movies like this don't come around often enough. With a refreshingly adult take on the "Indian in the Cupboard" (and only marginally less-racist) this film will take you in for the entirety of it's runtime. Beautiful scenery, an encouraging take on classes in society and plenty of humor make this a comfy escape for a few hours. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
johndoe2014Apr 8, 2020
I was completely caught off guard by where this went, but it was delightful. I have never liked Matt Damon more. It took some chances. And I appreciate that.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
Willyam_CarrDec 30, 2017
Downsizing is a solid, fun idea for movie. Sadly, the concept is better than the film itself. The first 40 minutes are downright boring, and the ending just felt odd. However, the concept is so strong that film makes you think about it for aDownsizing is a solid, fun idea for movie. Sadly, the concept is better than the film itself. The first 40 minutes are downright boring, and the ending just felt odd. However, the concept is so strong that film makes you think about it for a while. The biggest highlight of the film is Hong Chau's performance; she's one to look out for. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
JLuis_001Dec 31, 2017
Disappointing, especially coming from Alexander Payne. I think it's the most unfocused film of his career and despite dealing with quite interesting topics, he never manages to make them resonant or flashy, therefore the film falls and onlyDisappointing, especially coming from Alexander Payne. I think it's the most unfocused film of his career and despite dealing with quite interesting topics, he never manages to make them resonant or flashy, therefore the film falls and only manages to stay on put because Matt Damon has enough charisma to avoid it, even on front his simple acting.

And to waste Christoph Waltz that way only adds fuel to the fire.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
OscarAdcockMar 2, 2018
What did I just watch. Downsizing looked so good, its trailer was great and the first 30 (give or take) minutes where genuinely really great. The premise was so unique and they could have gone so far with it. But, by about the 30/40 minuteWhat did I just watch. Downsizing looked so good, its trailer was great and the first 30 (give or take) minutes where genuinely really great. The premise was so unique and they could have gone so far with it. But, by about the 30/40 minute mark it completely loses all focus. Its like someone stood in an office with a bunch of executives and pitched them the concept of Downsizing but actually hadn't written a story that could back it up. The film ultimately leaves you confused to wear its going to go next and in the end its really not satisfying. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
jackbailey02Dec 10, 2018
A strong contender for the worst film of all time, certainly the worst movie of 2017. The initial premise of the film is set up well, but after around thirty minutes the film becomes a total mess and seems to have no idea where it is going,A strong contender for the worst film of all time, certainly the worst movie of 2017. The initial premise of the film is set up well, but after around thirty minutes the film becomes a total mess and seems to have no idea where it is going, jumping from idea to idea throughout the rest of the duration. A total waste of time, I actually watched it again as I couldn't believe how poor the film was and I wanted to give it a chance to redeem itself. It didn't. There is a very good video essay on youtube called "How Downsizing Cheated You" which sums it up in quite a humorous way. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
ProteusDec 23, 2017
Intensity. This movie has none. It needs some badly. Somewhere anywhere. Long slow paced mildly very mildly entertaining movie. Unfortunately mildly entertaining is very easy to find these days. If ever a movie was a 5 out of 10 this is it.Intensity. This movie has none. It needs some badly. Somewhere anywhere. Long slow paced mildly very mildly entertaining movie. Unfortunately mildly entertaining is very easy to find these days. If ever a movie was a 5 out of 10 this is it. You can probably do better. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
6
EpicLadySpongeDec 22, 2017
Downsizing gives us the once-in-a-while size-changing theme and a very rare shrinking feeling to it but for the absolutely wrong reasons. That is much of a shame of what I just saw as the final film because I expected more to come out of thisDownsizing gives us the once-in-a-while size-changing theme and a very rare shrinking feeling to it but for the absolutely wrong reasons. That is much of a shame of what I just saw as the final film because I expected more to come out of this one hence the R rating. It makes everyone's promises come true but then eventually forgets where to put them in the finalized film. I was expecting an actual unforgettable adventure like what I have been experiencing with my dreams lately with this movie's theme and feeling but instead what I just got is too much drama put onto the film. Whenever it comes to films like these, I don't think drama is the best genre to aim for since it'll just make the finalized film worse than the promised film I was expecting. How many years do we have to wait until we get another film that focuses on size change? I sure hope not any longer than four because I would be so disappointed if that was the case. Expand
3 of 7 users found this helpful34
All this user's reviews
4
solitas777Mar 16, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What a piece of crap. The first 50 minutes is decent. Matt Damon is an occupational therapist, who wants the good life. He's struggling with life and he's going through the hum drum of daily grind. There is no joy in this man's life, there are no smiles, just the world weariness of the unending grind. Downsizing, a process that allows people to get small and live a higher standard of life on the cheap. Throughout this process, is his passionless wife, a cutesy (but not pretty) plain jane, who abandoned him after he goes through the process. Now...this would be the perfect time and vehicle for the story to transition to a guy that only know mediocrity to find fun and passion in his life. A sex love story could have been introduced here with a happily ever after.

NOPE. There is a divorce where a guy that had $150000 assets, which equals $12.5 million dollars in the "little world". After a divorce he works at a call center and loses his awesome mansion with a crappy apartment. I feel like their math is bad because even if he kept 10% of the money after his divorce he's still have over a million dollars, so what gives? This movie is slow and boring. I won't bore you because once it transitions to his life post divorce it slowed down to a crawl. In fact, it's so boring I can't even continue to review it. This piece of garbage isn't even worth putting any more effort into.
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
ledaumasDec 31, 2017
This movie is nothing like the trailer. The trailer makes you think it's a comedy and doesn't show anything about the Asian woman Matt Damon's character spends with after his wife Kristen Whig doesn't join him. It has its funny moments, butThis movie is nothing like the trailer. The trailer makes you think it's a comedy and doesn't show anything about the Asian woman Matt Damon's character spends with after his wife Kristen Whig doesn't join him. It has its funny moments, but mostly in the first half. The second half is thought provoking about what is important about live. In the end, the answer is that what's important in life is different for everyone. But I knew that. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
ozymandias79Mar 14, 2018
Downsizing is original. It isn't a sequel, remake/reboot, or comic book movie, which dominate these days. There's an interesting/humorous concept and the acting is solid. The subtle humor is great. Not sure why people wouldn't likeDownsizing is original. It isn't a sequel, remake/reboot, or comic book movie, which dominate these days. There's an interesting/humorous concept and the acting is solid. The subtle humor is great. Not sure why people wouldn't like Downsizing. Could be a result of the Marvel conquest of cinema. Unlike those movies, Downsizing has a soul. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
Aladdin718Apr 7, 2018
An original movie with a quirky premise that really grew on me and took me on a thoroughly enjoyable ride. In a field of cookie-cutter, predictable movies Downsizing was refreshingly original.
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
joylitDec 25, 2017
I thought this movie was brilliant, a cult classic in the making. It uses a great sci-fi concept to mirror modern day society, offering a soberimg reflection on how easy social/political solutions are always bound to replicate old models,I thought this movie was brilliant, a cult classic in the making. It uses a great sci-fi concept to mirror modern day society, offering a soberimg reflection on how easy social/political solutions are always bound to replicate old models, creating bigger problems. It reminded me of Terry Gilliam's Brazil and Joe Vs. The Volcano. Hong Chau gives a funny and endearing performance. This is really Alexander Payne's version of "Make America Great Again". Very underrated film. Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
7
GreatMartinDec 28, 2017
“Downsizing” is a perfect example of why not to read critics before you go to see a movie. Go to a movie because you like the cast or the genre of what you saw in the trailers or, maybe, even word of mouth.

Matt Damon’s last 2 movies bombed
“Downsizing” is a perfect example of why not to read critics before you go to see a movie. Go to a movie because you like the cast or the genre of what you saw in the trailers or, maybe, even word of mouth.

Matt Damon’s last 2 movies bombed at the box office—“The Great Wall” deservedly, “Suburicon” not—but “Downsizing” is a good movie.

I go to see any Matt Damon movie and, yes, he has made a few bad ones (Don’t see “The Great Wall”!) and, yes, the director Alexander Payne who also wrote the screenplay with Jim Taylor, doesn’t follow through on a few deep ideas but the premise is different, there are laughs, there are tears and just how they shrunk a 6 foot person to 5 inches and surrounded them with first the ‘tall world’ and then the ‘miniature’ world is in itself a reason to see the movie.

While the main theme is human survival and why downsizing people will help with that there is also the problem of punishing dissidents by downsizing them and making them poor immigrants to wait on the new wealthy. Paul Safranek (Damon) is the married American everyman who is just gets by and becomes intrigued the more he hears about the Norwegian doctor, played by Rolf Lassgard, that his project of shrinking humans is successful plus he hears from others including some old friends that he didn’t know had gone through the project and has nothing but raves about it. When Paul learns what little money he has would be worth about $12 million in Leisureland where this new species of humans live in a perfect world.

As Paul learns about this new world so do we and we follow him in his journey meeting his new friends two aging party guys, Christopher Waltz and Udo Kier, into booze, drugs, women playing and using them as if they were frat boys. One of the benefits of everything being small is made fun of with Kier owning a fully equipped yacht that he has Fedex’d where he goes to get there before him.

We eventually meet Ngoc Lan, played by Hong Chau, while she cleans Waltz's apartment, right above Paul’s, who at one time was a famous Vietnam dissident, who now lives in a tenement world of various Third World people who are sick and ill-equipped to take care of themselves. Ngoc wears a prosthetic device, is direct taking no nonsense and spending her time before, during and after cleaning places taking care of others.

Without giving away any spoilers Paul and Ngoc with her bossing him around and they eventually team up with Waltz and Kier going to Norway to hear about the next step in saving the world.

While not getting too deep into the world situation but explaining enough plainly the journey Paul takes from being the normal guy then going through the shrinkage steps, which provides a few laughs, becoming adapted to being rich, taking a dead end job and a decision he has to make near the end is the arc of drama of the film.

Matt Damon does an excellent job as Paul, Christopher Waltz and Udo Kier are a hoot as the two aging playboys but it is Hong Chau who steals the film and has a 4-5 minute bit using the ‘f’ word that, while funny also has a lot of feelings.

There are cameos by Laura Dern, Margo Martindale, Neil Patrick Harris, Jason Sudeikis, Maribeth Monroe and James Van Der Beek among others while the aforementioned Rolf Lassgard along with Kristen Wiig offers strong support.

“Downsizing” is the second film I have seen this week, the other being “The Greatest Showman”, that have been snubbed by the critics but which offer strong performances by the male lead, with the former also having an award worthy female lead, and is definitely worth seeing.

Rated R for language, drug usage and frontal nudity.
Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
9
MaureenOSDec 27, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I assumed Downsizing would be light entertainment to kill a couple of hours before meeting friends in the food court. Instead, it riveted my attention from the beginning.The silly premise of people, en masse, shrinking down to five inches is the vehicle for an existential work of art more akin to Camus' The Plague, or Kafka's The Metamorphosis, than 'Honey, I Shrank the Kids'. To reduce the human carbon footprint, a scientist discovers a way to shrink people down to five inches. Not only will small people consume less but their personal wealth will increase in inverse proportion to their new size as their tiny houses and other necessities of life will now cost pennies on the dollar. This increase in wealth is the marketing tool used to entice customers to downsize. The movie opens at a scientific conference to announce the discovery of the transformational process. But the cutting-edge scientific tone soon shifts to a campy small town setting where the main character, Paul Safraneck, played by Matt Damon, is seen caring for his sick, aged mother. Both tone and settings kept ricocheting off in unexpected directions like marbles in a pinball machine. Worlds meld into worlds. A tunnel connects an idyllic small community to its dystopian counterpart of bleak carton-sized cement blocks of tiered units that house the poor and disenfranchized. Another tunnel is like the stuff of dreams, where the dreamer must choose to proceed one way or the other, forever sealing his fate depending on which way he goes. An Avatar-like forest filled with a lush extravagance of giant leaves and flowers seem magical from the perspective of people five inches tall. A scene of workplace banter among medical techs in a huge transformation plant seems mundane enough until a door opens and the giant head of a 'big' co-worker fills the doorway. But rather than feeling disjointed, the constantly shifting tone and settings are more like the whorls and eddies in a swiftly flowing mountain stream, with Paul a leaf floating Zen-like atop the ever-changing current. Matt Damon's acting talent shines as Paul is repeatedly thrust into bewildering circumstances and meets them with an expression of pure receptivity, the receptivity usually seen in children who find themselves in a perplexing adult situation and stand, transfixed, soaking everything up like a sponge. It's the receptivity to ever-changing circumstance and banishment of desires that's been timelessly advocated by Eastern mystics. I'd always assumed that by 'desire' these wisdom traditions meant desiring material things like cars and houses, or the more ephemeral desires of ambition and competition. But Paul not only has no interest in material wealth, which he shows by moving out of his tiny mansion into an apartment, neither does he have any 'What's in this for me?' or 'How do I get out of this mess?' personal agenda. He's neither self-pitying or rageful as his new small life goes unexpectedly wrong. He doesn't seem to desire anything - only to immerse himself in the flow of his new life, doing whatever is required of him in every shifting situation. I never knew what the Zen virtue of egolessness looked like before. Now I do. It looks like Paul Safranek. Paul has an unassuming presence. He runs like Forest Gump. His good nature is evident from the beginning when he rushes home from his job as an industrial occupational therapist to care for his sick mother. Only later do we learn the great sacrifice he made career-wise to move back home to care for her. A number of highly creative scenes are memorable, like when Paul struggles to carry a beautiful normal sized rose as a gift to a neighbor. Or the eerily real dialogue when trapped in a car with a stranger, he's forced to make polite conversation immediately after receiving a devastating loss. Or the visually surreal ballet without music as hundreds of still anesthetized newly made small people are adeptly scooped up onto spatulas and placed in carts for transport by giant techs with all the precision and repetitive motion of workers on an assembly line. A wordless backward glance at an old man in a wheelchair chomping down on a cold piece of chicken says everything necessary about who Paul is, and what motivates him. The only reason I didn't give Downsizing a 10 is because I found the role of Tran played by Hong Chou just a bit too abrasive. As the movie neared the end, something made me look away from the screen and around the darkened theatre. It was something odd I sensed. Only about a dozen other people were there with me. But there was no crinkling of candy wrappers, no shifting in seats. There was an atmosphere of deep silence, a collective of mental energy inwardly focused, like in a church where only a handful of people are sitting or kneeling, intent only on their prayers. Not surprising, since Downsizing is ultimately a deeply spiritual movie. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
5
BHBarryDec 24, 2017
“Downsizing” was directed by Alexander Payne who, with Jim Taylor, wrote the story and screenplay. The film stars Matt Damon, Christoph Waltz, Kristen Wiig and Hong Chau. I went to this film expecting to see an elaboration of a very tempting“Downsizing” was directed by Alexander Payne who, with Jim Taylor, wrote the story and screenplay. The film stars Matt Damon, Christoph Waltz, Kristen Wiig and Hong Chau. I went to this film expecting to see an elaboration of a very tempting trailer but, unfortunately, the best part of the film was, in fact, all in the trailer itself. What starts out with a very intriguing concept, i.e. shrinking human beings to a height of 5 inches with a proportionate environment around them, loses itself in the first 30 minutes and travels in a number of different directions, most of which involve the writer’s political statements about climate change and the harm humans are doing to the planet. Also, to add another negative to the film is the role played by Thailand actress Hong Chau and what has to be the worst attempt ever made at imitating a Vietnamese émigré. Simply stated, she ruins each scene in which she appears with this ‘chalk on a blackboard” dialogue. Couple all of this with plot changes and ideas that make no sense and you have a disappointing and uncomfortable 135 minutes. I give the film a rating of 6.02 because of what it started out to be, and could have been, but unfortunately went downhill in mid reel. In summary, all of Mr. Payne’s efforts as director and co-writer of this film came up short (pun intended). Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
1
frenesiFeb 9, 2018
Malísima esperaba encortar una película bien organizada de fantasía y esta llena de incoherencias y fallos en la escala de los objetos del mundo mini al normal
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
p_reinJan 17, 2018
The movie is proper entertainment. While it touches on some important topics such as environmental issues and overpopulation they are not the main theme. Actually, the main theme is hard to describe as it seems to change a few times but thatThe movie is proper entertainment. While it touches on some important topics such as environmental issues and overpopulation they are not the main theme. Actually, the main theme is hard to describe as it seems to change a few times but that doesn't ruin the movie at all.
I feel like people get some expectations based on the trailer and get them shattered during the movie, hence the low rating so far. I expected nothing more than good acting when I saw the cast and was not disappointed at all.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
EthanAnSequoyahFeb 20, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ethan's Review: Let me just start off by saying this is possibly the worst movie I have ever seen, the other movie that comes close to this movie by being the worst is "Mother", and that's saying something. The premise is what got me, along with Matt Damon. Who doesn't like Matt Damon? My friend Sequoyah after this movie (who will be typing his review after mine. Let's just say the only part of the movie I enjoyed was the Vietnamese character, only because of the racist stereotype that they show in this movie. To conclude, just don't watch this film. Don't even rent on redbox. Sequoyah's Review:If i could change history and choose between stopping 9/11 or stopping Matt Damon from acting in this movie, I would pick the latter in a heartbeat. This movie is like having pins shoved into my urethra and then someone poured lemonade on it, with nice salt and a garlic to finish it off. The only good thing about this movie is the philosophical question asked by the Vietnamese lady "What kinda **** you give me?", I spent 12.00 dollars on this... To sum it all up, this movie was terrible. Do not watch it. Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
10
ExistentialmanDec 23, 2017
I saw Downsizing last night and immediately after I would have given it a 6, but after letting it sink in, the film really resonated with me. At this point I will give it a 10. I'm going to make this a spoiler free review, in the hope thatI saw Downsizing last night and immediately after I would have given it a 6, but after letting it sink in, the film really resonated with me. At this point I will give it a 10. I'm going to make this a spoiler free review, in the hope that some people will see it based on my experience. The film speaks to issues of global warming and who we should be spending our life with knowing that we're destroying our environment and possibly destroying ourselves as a species. I really feel like I now have a better understanding of how I want to live my life in the face of climate change. It also feels like a feature film version of a Black Mirror episode. I love Black Mirror, so if you're a fan of that show you'll probably have a great time watching Downsizing. Expand
7 of 40 users found this helpful733
All this user's reviews
7
Arkham26Jan 27, 2018
To be honest, I was waiting for this movie for such a long time. The trailer itself suggested it's gonna be something very different. Among all the other tiny people movies we have watched so far such as Gulliver's Travel which focuses onTo be honest, I was waiting for this movie for such a long time. The trailer itself suggested it's gonna be something very different. Among all the other tiny people movies we have watched so far such as Gulliver's Travel which focuses on comedy but Downsizing focuses on the feelings and emotions. If you liked the trailer definitely you gonna love the movie as well. Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
10
tennisracketproJan 2, 2018
sound interesting , can't wait to see it. sci-fi movie my thing, but Matt in this kind of genre ... i don,t see you shining here son. you're better of with action
2 of 17 users found this helpful215
All this user's reviews
4
DaveisonlineMar 16, 2019
Downsizing is a film with a very intriguing idea with promising world building, but ultimately fails to capitalize on its own concept and instead opts for a poorly executed political message that conflicts with its subject matter.

I will say
Downsizing is a film with a very intriguing idea with promising world building, but ultimately fails to capitalize on its own concept and instead opts for a poorly executed political message that conflicts with its subject matter.

I will say the first act of the movie does a great job of setting up its world building by having its dialogue grounded in its sci-fi premise of humanity able to shrink down to a few inches to create a whole new society where they only need a fraction of the resources they would consume as normal sized beings and effectively live a life of wealth. Unfortunately once the 2nd act, its entire premise becomes completely trivial, to the point where its Sci-Fi premise is practically meaningless. And it also doesn't help that the story we have now is driven by a main character who is completely bland and uninteresting, not to mention that he seemingly fails to make any meaningful decisions for himself until the very end to run back for a cheesy romance subplot that lacks any chemistry.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
1
VagueShapeDec 29, 2018
Interesting idea, poor execution. By the second half of the movie it squanders the uniqueness of the plot for Hollywood cliches of humanitarianism and unlikely romance. I found myself constantly mocking the predictability of it all andInteresting idea, poor execution. By the second half of the movie it squanders the uniqueness of the plot for Hollywood cliches of humanitarianism and unlikely romance. I found myself constantly mocking the predictability of it all and wishing for it to be over. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
BitashJul 10, 2020
I watched the movie since I knew Matt Damon doesn’t do awful movies, it surprised me as what it was about and could not predict the script at all. I loved the script idea, acting was superb. The Vietnamese actress was amazing. Her last twoI watched the movie since I knew Matt Damon doesn’t do awful movies, it surprised me as what it was about and could not predict the script at all. I loved the script idea, acting was superb. The Vietnamese actress was amazing. Her last two scenes were so believable that I forgot I’m watching a movie.
Great script, movie takes you through a ride. Enjoy it, it will make you think at the end. Yes the world is over populated. So maybe we will stop having so many kids. Loved it
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
2
bartcbemJan 15, 2020
Unfortunately pretty boring, confused, environmental preachy bait and switch movie.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
mrdr4gonApr 7, 2018
I actually recommend watching on the basis of it being completely bizarre and constantly ridiculous alone.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
manningn15Oct 15, 2018
One of the most boring and dull movies I have ever had the displeasure to have watched. The only thing that made the movie not suck totally was the acting of Matt Damon and Hong Chau.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
FilmTVReviewJul 27, 2019
I’ll just wait til it’s on Netflix’ is the type of film this is and why it flopped at the cinema. Full of great actors, but a hollow script. I’ve never seen a film that starts so promisingly, intriguing and quirky, but then just slowly getsI’ll just wait til it’s on Netflix’ is the type of film this is and why it flopped at the cinema. Full of great actors, but a hollow script. I’ve never seen a film that starts so promisingly, intriguing and quirky, but then just slowly gets worse and worse. I want my money back! Oh right yeah, didn’t go to the cinema... phew! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
Jason_bJan 3, 2020
Not funny. Really boring. I hope Matt Damon donated all that money to his clean water charity. Also if they would've donated the $68 million it cost to make it, the world would be a better place.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
Sosmooth1982Jul 9, 2023
Really weird and pointless movie. He decides to become small but then that's pretty much it. After he has the operation there's really nothing else interesting about the movie after that. I give it a 4 just cause the Vietnamize lady had meReally weird and pointless movie. He decides to become small but then that's pretty much it. After he has the operation there's really nothing else interesting about the movie after that. I give it a 4 just cause the Vietnamize lady had me cracking up. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
geewahJan 8, 2021
An ambitious movie that starts off with a lot of promise but the further this bloated movie goes on it quickly loses it's appeal.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
Tss5078Jan 23, 2019
Billed as a comedy, Downsizing didn't last long in theaters, but looking at it from the perspective of Science Fiction and taking into account it's message about environmental protection, this film ends up having a lot more depth than theBilled as a comedy, Downsizing didn't last long in theaters, but looking at it from the perspective of Science Fiction and taking into account it's message about environmental protection, this film ends up having a lot more depth than the lame duck comedy it was advertised as. In the near future, a scientist comes up with a way to stop the problem of overpopulation by shrinking people to five inches tall. At first the world is shocked, but when the financial benefits come to light, ordinary people are rushing to have a life of luxury. One such person is Paul Safranek (Matt Damon), who is at risk of losing his home and marriage. He and his wife decide to undergo the procedure, but when Paul awakens, he learns that his wife couldn't go through with it, and he's left to navigate this brave new world on his own. The logistic and social changes brought upon by this simple transition are amazing! I really got into the whole thing from the process to the luxury world they live in, and to the discovery that poverty can still exist even in paradise. I really don't know why the studio would bill and advertise this film as a comedy, because really it's more sad than it is funny. In fact, aside from a few lines here and there, nothing about this film or the situation Paul gets into are really funny. Matt Damon stars and as has become common place with him lately, he seems to just be going through the motions. His lack of emotion made his a hard character to like. Thankfully he is paired with newcomer Hong Chau who really steals the show. Downsizing is a film with a terrific idea, with every last detail executed to perfection, however once characters get involved, the story becomes much less interesting. Once you put aside the setting, this film can be broken down to a simple love story, which doesn't do the rest of the film justice. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
SpankyNov 11, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is definitely Al Gore's wet dream movie. What started out as a pleasant, unique and original film of downsizing turned into a depressing political and dark movie halfway through. Just like Elysium, Matt Damon LOVES to be in Liberal/Leftist political movies that excoriate the middle class and well to do over poor, downtrodden Hispanic immigrants. Add on top of that, humanity's selfish total destruction of the planet and you've got yourself a typical Hollywood social message crammed down your throat. My wife and I really enjoyed the unique first part, which is why it has two stars. The rest of the film brought it down. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Jes1310Jul 29, 2019
I had fairly high expextations for this film. Loved Sideways and his other work is also good. But this left my very dissapointed. It is way tooo long, it can not decide whether its a comedy or drama. The actors are way to kliché to be beliveable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
EludiumQ36Apr 12, 2018
Though couched in a scifi/fantasy trope of human miniaturization, make no mistake, this is a Hollywood lecture on climate change and how we're doomed in your lifetime, not some theoretically distant future. Matt Damon is no action hero hero,Though couched in a scifi/fantasy trope of human miniaturization, make no mistake, this is a Hollywood lecture on climate change and how we're doomed in your lifetime, not some theoretically distant future. Matt Damon is no action hero hero, more the middle-aged with spare tire love interest of a barely paraplegic Vietnamese who plays to stereotype. Don't think too hard about the miniaturization process and its world, there are MANY plausibility problems with it so it's not even worth criticizing in detail but the cinematic technique they use to show us this is of some interest. Kristen Wiig plays against her comic-type in a chicken-sh*t, heartless role which makes us hate her character so I guess she figures that works for her career as a diverse actress. Christolph Waltz was the only character of amusement making your sit-through somewhat tolerable. Rolfe Kent's whimsical accompanying music echoes John Williams' ET job and cast events in a lighter mood than they should've been so that was some weirdness. Disappointing film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
HealingToolbox1Feb 11, 2018
What interests me is how the script might have been changed given its strong premise. I'm struck with teh similarities with Damon's Elysium plot set up. Downsizing runs out of dramatic momentum I think because it picks a weak centralWhat interests me is how the script might have been changed given its strong premise. I'm struck with teh similarities with Damon's Elysium plot set up. Downsizing runs out of dramatic momentum I think because it picks a weak central conflict; and then, does not foreshadow Paul's decision to back out of the tunnel. What I suspect is the stronger script is skip the whole first act. It's smart but leads to no clear conflict. Jump into teh middle more. Set up the conflict between the low wage service workers and the bored-hedonistic smalls. Where does real humanity lie? This would make the plot even more like Elysium. I think a key here. I do honor Matt's and Hong Chau's performances. Matt has again demonstrated his amazing courage. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsOct 13, 2018
It had a really interesting premise, but the actual story was quite lacking, was expecting something much better and different.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
johnem95May 3, 2018
Gets aggressively uninteresting very quick. Between this and "Suburbicon", 2017 really was the year for Matt Damon movies with an identity crisis.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TrailesqueAug 11, 2021
Here is a lavishly weird-normal SF comedy from Payne (and his co-writer Jim Taylor). It is something new for them, since their previous flicks have mostly been grounded in middle class American reality. This begins very much that way butHere is a lavishly weird-normal SF comedy from Payne (and his co-writer Jim Taylor). It is something new for them, since their previous flicks have mostly been grounded in middle class American reality. This begins very much that way but eventually spins off in a completely unexpected direction, and ends up someplace unique.

The premise is interesting - imagine a technology that allows people to shrink themselves down to a fraction of normal size. What would humanity do with that? Well, use it to stretch the family budget and retire to gated communities and lives of leisure, of course! Your dollar buys a lot more when you are 5 inches tall. Alas, the same problems that plague the regular world (e.g. poverty and illness) reappear in this one. An impending environmental disaster rears up, and our average guy hero (well played by Damon as always) ends up heading off to Norway and an encounter with the second coming of Noah's ark. The visual effects are very interesting, but some of the characters are not exactly a pleasure to spend time with. Overall this is a unique motion picture, and well worth a look. Unfortunately, it was not a hit at the box office, and ended up losing some money.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
BSchwarz95Mar 14, 2019
In 2017, one of the holiday movie releases that I was most anticipated was a film called Downsizing from director Alexander Payne (The Descendants, Nebraska, Sideways, About Schmidt) and starring a stellar cast including Matt Damon, ChristophIn 2017, one of the holiday movie releases that I was most anticipated was a film called Downsizing from director Alexander Payne (The Descendants, Nebraska, Sideways, About Schmidt) and starring a stellar cast including Matt Damon, Christoph Waltz, Kristin Wigg, Jason Sudeikis, et cetera. What’s not to be excited about? On top of that, it’s an original sci-fi movie that takes place in a modern world and looks at our lives through a sci-fi lens; critiquing us and our lives is the pinnacle of great, classic sci-fi and to see another movie do that and appeal to a wide audience is something that makes me genuinely happy.

And then the movie comes out.

Not only does it not do too well at the box office (at all), but the reaction it garners from critics and audiences alike was disappointing to say the least. Of course, being the naïve millennial that I am, I think that in order to enjoy this movie to it’s fullest potential, I should wait until the hoopla dies down and I may watch it with a clean slate. So, that’s exactly what I do.

I wait.

Now, it’s free to watch with a Hulu subscription (which I have because Community is a show that exists) and I was excited to see it pop up on my home screen. Over the last three nights, I finally watched it for myself. What did I think?

Yeah, “mixed reviews” sound about right.

During the first, say, 30 minutes I found myself enjoying it quite a bit. I think the premise is truly great and reminds me of some of Jim Carrey’s best films of the late-90’s and early-2000’s. With a script as unique as this, undeniable talent in front of and behind the camera, and an audience that’s clamoring for a great tale that this film promised, what went wrong? Well, it was the marketing that ruined this film. Even after waiting over a year to watch it for myself, I still feel as though this film has been grossly mismarketed in every way. Granted, I’m not sure how I would market this either (at least not honestly), but that doesn’t change the fact that what people wanted and what people got were dreadfully different.

While I sound quite negative in my perspective of the film, know that it is not the film itself that I have such disdain for, but the way this film was sold to audiences. If you remember the trailers, and I urge you not to, you’ll remember that this was sold as an Oscar-bait drama/comedy about life itself, and how best to appreciate it. It seemed like it was going to be a movie about enjoying the small aspects of life, paying attention to the little things, not judging a book by its cover and all of that cliched, usual stuff. What was this movie actually about? Well…enjoying the small aspects of life, paying attention to the little things, and not judging a book by its cover. But also, the end of the world? If Jim Carrey was in a movie that’s like Honey I Shrunk the Kids meets Seeking a Friend for the End of the World, I’d see that in a heartbeat. It would be unique, entertaining, and heartfelt.

This did not end up being that movie. It’s not Matt Damon’s fault, but the character we follow for the 135-minute runtime makes the film feel so much longer than it actually is. We don’t follow him because we enjoy being with him, we follow him because we pity him and, like the movie says at least three times, he’s pathetic. This movie is about his personal growth from being an everyday “no man,” to more of a free-willed “yes man.” Again, Jim Carrey would have made this movie simply marvelous. Instead of being about the celebration of life, it’s about how Paul becomes less pathetic. Still, the whole “nothing ever goes right for this guy” continues all the way until the credits, so did his new-found outlook on life really make a difference? I don’t think so.

I love a good character study, and I love a good movie about accepting the broad, uncontrollable aspects of life…but this film is neither, and it feels like it becomes something completely different. It’s about a very non-special man who undergoes a procedure that 3% of the entire Earth’s population goes through, who we pity throughout, and who weaves in and out of other people’s lives so much so that you never really know which characters are going to still be in the movie after another 10 minutes, and then who encounters the possible end of the human race. By the end of the film, we have such a rag-tag group of misfits that I felt as though I was watching something completely different than what I started three years ago (or however long this movie was).

However, I actually quite liked the movie. I did not find it boring, bad, or in any way unbearable. Granted, it was a good 135-minute movie when it could have been a bloody fantastic 90-minute movie but the film we got is what it is: a unique sci-fi movie that was embarrassingly mismarketed.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AndrewBurgeAug 10, 2018
Directed and co-written by one of the best modern filmmakers, Alexander Payne, "Downsizing" suffers, in part, from its own ambition. It attempts at being a serious environmental warning, a hypothetical splash of futurism, a social satire,Directed and co-written by one of the best modern filmmakers, Alexander Payne, "Downsizing" suffers, in part, from its own ambition. It attempts at being a serious environmental warning, a hypothetical splash of futurism, a social satire, screwball comedy and even surrealism (or at least is the only way I can explain some of these characters). Its initial concepts are flawless, but for all its intelligence, it delves quickly into single-minded, single-focused stupidity.

I felt slightly insulted watching this film. During the first half, it prepares you for the social puzzles and multi-layered decisions coming with deciding to undergo a medical procedure for shrinking your body to around five inches tall. Paul Safranek (Matt Damon), an occupational therapist and his wife, Audrey (Kristen Wiig) are a bit short, so hearing all the financial benefits (and the environmental benefits) of downsizing they decide to do it. It is at this point where the film completely abandons all its social ideas and becomes extremely single-focused leaving every single sub-plot in the air. It happens so quickly that it feels like a huge middle-finger.

This would not be such a big problem if the new ideas were not so unbelievably half-assed and silly. There is a methane gas from Antarctica which apparently brought the end of the world all of a sudden. Yet there is no contact with the normal sized civilization. Everything is left in the air. Overall, there is a bizarre production rush. Sure, by the end of it, there is a moral decision about the future of civilization and what-not.

Unfortunately, the personalities of the characters which were intended to be parodies of the middle-class ignorant modern man are actually carbon copies of the middle-class ignorant modern man. Basically, Paul Safranek has to be the lamest and stupidest character since Napoleon Dynamite. That is not a compliment. Not in a film with such serious themes; and I am not even going to mention Ngoc Lan Tran (Hong Chau), an ambitious refugee which I can only describe as ignorant; not to mention the slightly stereotypical portrayal of her. Everything she says is given through this broken "engrish" and you cannot take her seriously.

In the end, this is "Downsizing"'s biggest flaw. It is unbelievably confusing at showing you when it wants to be taken seriously. Still, I am going to focus on the first half...
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
CasandraComplexAug 14, 2022
Another great premise and crappy follow through. The beginning is all very interesting and then ...... ?? It always comes down to bad writing, in the the decade and a half, this is the repeating pattern of Hollywood. Probably becauseAnother great premise and crappy follow through. The beginning is all very interesting and then ...... ?? It always comes down to bad writing, in the the decade and a half, this is the repeating pattern of Hollywood. Probably because Hollywood has become politicized to the point that it destroys all creativity just like what trying to appease chinese communist dictators does to creativity. The artistry in Hollywood has been completely gutted out of the industry. They just simply cannot make a decent film under all of the compromises made for the politically correct (communist chinese invention) injecting stupid intersectionality where there aren't any historically ( revisionist history)

How many films have I seen foreigners, children who have no clue how the world works and females lecturing a castrated white male about politics that they have no hope in hell of understanding. And we say," oh! Isn't that Vietnamese character so sassy when she says," stupid maaan" then the politically correct converts snicker with smugness that somehow they have driven some progressive point home when in reality, they are living in a false reality.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
jb1296Jun 22, 2018
Downsizing has an interesting premise but outside of this the film does nothing interesting with the concept. There are far more interesting stories that could have been told other than the one we got to see. The film has issues like theDownsizing has an interesting premise but outside of this the film does nothing interesting with the concept. There are far more interesting stories that could have been told other than the one we got to see. The film has issues like the writing and the special effects are awful, although this film has good reviews from critics this is a film which people shouldn't watch because you deserve to watch something that is entertaining, which this isn't. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
keonbreezSep 17, 2021
so boring lmao. the characters are annoying, one of matt damons worst performances ever.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews