Divergent

5

sanyrubJan 25, 2015

The movie is entertaining enough and there are really talented people involved, but the script is weak and the story in general does not quiet take off. It is decent and the best thing is probably that there is room for improvement in theThe movie is entertaining enough and there are really talented people involved, but the script is weak and the story in general does not quiet take off. It is decent and the best thing is probably that there is room for improvement in the upcoming sequels. Just for when you have a couple of hours you don´t know what to do and have seen all the other better films out there.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

shpostalMar 23, 2014

Dystopian movies are all the rage with Hollywood, especially in the wake of the "Hunger Games" series. After seeing "Divergent" I couldn't help but wondering if it shouldn't have been called "Derivative".
Not that it's a terribleDystopian movies are all the rage with Hollywood, especially in the wake of the "Hunger Games" series. After seeing "Divergent" I couldn't help but wondering if it shouldn't have been called "Derivative".
Not that it's a terrible movie, or the cinematography is terrible - it just doesn't have much in the way of originality going for it, nor does it have the cast of "Hunger Games" caliber. Face it - there's only one Jennifer Lawrence, and her charisma is far superior to any actor or actress in this film. Not even Cate Blanchett can save this movie, coming across as oddly wooden rather than sinister.
Classes of people divided into sectors? "Brave New World". Mind control? The same. Urban decay? Tons of movies like "Warriors".
What makes this an average film is its length, too damn long and a failure to allow audiences to really connect with the acting. We get "Ender's Game" style training and the usual bottom to top struggle to fit into a group.
All in all "Divergent" has possibilities maybe for a sequel that could actually be good - the "divergents" coalescing somewhere and taking on the structured society of the post-war Chicago, where the reason for the war or the reason for the class structure are never explained. Just shows how power the "Hunger Games" series ultimately is.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

5

DexterVaneSep 6, 2014

In itself an interesting concept, the movie was riddled with cliches and was dragged out a lot longer than necessary. I'm not too sure about the actors either. Very mixed performances. But overall enjoyable, although not amazing in any way

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

chwMar 12, 2015

Divergent is the most clichéd movie I've seen so far. If there weren't any clichés, there would still be the terrible acting. If there wasn't any terrible acting and no clichés, there would be no movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SimpleReviewzMar 23, 2014

Before starting, let's just say first that I DID read the book, so this review will be from that perspective. Overall, I was disappointed with Divergent. It kinda betrays what the book was. Dialogue is different, scenes are changed and orBefore starting, let's just say first that I DID read the book, so this review will be from that perspective. Overall, I was disappointed with Divergent. It kinda betrays what the book was. Dialogue is different, scenes are changed and or cut out, and it just doesn't feel as special as it should be. Theo James and Shailene Woodley were very, very good in terms of acting, and just a great pick, too. Miles Teller is almost as good. The other characters? Meh. Just your typical teens. The action held up, but was nothing extraordinary. Remember how I said dialogue was different? Well, yep, the script is just plain boring. In terms of the scenes, some of the great ones are cut out. Come on Hollywood, know what scenes to cut out when your making a movie based on a book. Yes, the book is LOONG, so they had to make some sacrifices. One of my favorite parts of the book is how much you see Tris change. Here, it is slightly noticeable, but not to the book's degree. I'm about to talk about the ending, so watch out for spoilers. IT PISSED ME OFF. IT'S BARELY ANYTHING LIKE THE BOOK'S, AND IT MIGHT EVEN BETRAY THE NEXT MOVIE. Overall, Divergent feels like a mixed bag. You have your good parts, and complete opposites. Its not as bad as the terrible Twilight junk, but still not worthy enough to stand up with the best. (hint, hint HUNGER GAMES!)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

MigukApr 6, 2014

Should have a giant warning "For Teenage Girls Only"!! If you liked Hunger Games you will be disappointed by this movie..........................................................................................................

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

5

superblabloMay 20, 2014

Too similar to Harry Potter and especially to The Hunger Games saga. A teenager girl has been chosen to save the world in the future. This is what a teenager will be looking for when Katniss movies are over.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

AntoGrayoSep 7, 2014

This film offers some good moments that have you screwing up your face and you really do feel the emotion behind certain scenes. The storytelling is good, but it drags out a bit and there is not enough action. Ultimately, it misses out orThis film offers some good moments that have you screwing up your face and you really do feel the emotion behind certain scenes. The storytelling is good, but it drags out a bit and there is not enough action. Ultimately, it misses out or just ignores little unanswered questions and fails to capitalize on the climax, it's really quite a boring ending. Worth a watch if you like waiting three years for a sequel, but I wouldn't recommend it as I personally hate unfinished stories and I don't think 'The World of Divergent' will make it to it's third 2-parter (yawn) instalment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

WJSJan 10, 2015

This movie looks really good, is well acted and has a great soundtrack. Unfortunately, its script is weak and the direction is laboured. It plays out far too long and its cast is quite beautiful, which proves distracting. The problem here isThis movie looks really good, is well acted and has a great soundtrack. Unfortunately, its script is weak and the direction is laboured. It plays out far too long and its cast is quite beautiful, which proves distracting. The problem here is that its YA roots are showing, and for me that's a problem, because the only YA film I've enjoyed in the past while is "Enders Game".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Jeebus117Jan 25, 2021

The first in the series is worth watching, as it builds a moderately compelling utopia/dystopia blend. But this quickly gives way to teen romance, and rehashed character types.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

WheelzFourReelzDec 28, 2014

Like the first book in the series, Divergent didn't really impress me. It has solid acting and some fun to be had, but the film lacks all tension and logic that is important in one of these stories.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

heathermMay 13, 2015

I didn't have particularly high expectations for this movie, and so I was pleasantly surprised that it's a reasonably good offering. The main actress falls flat often, as she doesn't seem to express very much emotion. Her instructor Four isI didn't have particularly high expectations for this movie, and so I was pleasantly surprised that it's a reasonably good offering. The main actress falls flat often, as she doesn't seem to express very much emotion. Her instructor Four is much more interesting, as he takes her under his wing and helps her learn to get by in her new faction, showing more knowledge and ability than our main character seems to have. One thing the film does well is lay out the world of the factions and how they work, giving the audience enough information to follow and get by, but still leaving lots of questions unanswered for the later movies. Still, it's not a particularly compelling dystopia, and even Kate Winslet's menacing would-be autocrat can't quite save the movie. One of the most interesting performances comes from Miles Teller, whose character provides the perfect love-to-hate rival. The movie had a reasonably compelling plot arc, but it did leave something to be desired; partly this can be blamed on the necessity of setting things up for the next movie, but it would have been nice if it functioned better as a standalone film to introduce the series.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

RereRayendrasMar 13, 2015

Not a bad movie even though the movie is mostly lack of action or moments that makes the viewers like the movie. Also, many parts of the movie makes me bored.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

CineAutoctonoJan 10, 2016

" Divergent " was a very good adaptation of the book of Vereonica Roth, but in the film , was a bit dramatic but no action, or some excitement , but what stands out is the role of Shailene Woodley.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

nahtan1244Mar 22, 2016

dystopian society movies are interesting. I guess something like this could happen in real life but if so that would be way far into the future. We have seen good dystopian society movies the hunger games catching fire and some bad such asdystopian society movies are interesting. I guess something like this could happen in real life but if so that would be way far into the future. We have seen good dystopian society movies the hunger games catching fire and some bad such as the giver. Divergent is a interesting slow often times boring movie that tries to be like the hunger games but is far less exciting. Shaline woodly delvers the movies best performance as the girl who does not fit into any faction because she is divergent. Kate Winslet delivers a fine performance as the movies main villain. Maybe i was expecting something like the hunger games i don't know what it was but despite the interesting story divergent is a boring lifeless and plotting entry into the dystopian movie cannon that is far better than the giver but inferior the the mostly good hunger games movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SomePersonaFeb 6, 2017

This movie is very weak and clichéd. The characters are underdeveloped, the chemistry stinks, and the finished film looks and feels teen-ish and unprofessional. There are some strokes of greatness in there though like some of the acting andThis movie is very weak and clichéd. The characters are underdeveloped, the chemistry stinks, and the finished film looks and feels teen-ish and unprofessional. There are some strokes of greatness in there though like some of the acting and some of the science fiction ideas of the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

S1r-R34lJan 12, 2017

How not to run a world after a devastating war. Having not read the books I can;t say how close to the source material they are. But if they are accurate then I don't want to read the books. The original concept of the story is flawed fromHow not to run a world after a devastating war. Having not read the books I can;t say how close to the source material they are. But if they are accurate then I don't want to read the books. The original concept of the story is flawed from the start. I cannot see how a population could progress as these have, into five factions (and wear specific colours and live in specific abodes), this is just too much human nature wouldn't be able to do it. And that is the crux of the story and a Catch22 situation. However, the action is good, the direction isn't bad, the acting is average with likes of Ashley Judd, Ray Stephenson, and Kate Winslet giving less than their skills allow.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

CoreGamer1408Feb 20, 2019

Ok got the the entire boxset of three films for less than one new DVD. Seems like a low budget made for TV movie like quality. The story comes across as a cautionary tale against the perils of collectivism and indentity politics'. The localOk got the the entire boxset of three films for less than one new DVD. Seems like a low budget made for TV movie like quality. The story comes across as a cautionary tale against the perils of collectivism and indentity politics'. The local is kind of drab post-apocalyptic mixed in with some future tech. Easy to pick up and put down. I watched the first film in fits and starts. Yeah I can see myself watching the next movie at some point, but no rush.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

jiffer2387Mar 22, 2014

If I was rating this just as a standalone movie I would have given it a 6, but as a book adaptation it fell really short. The writers left out details from the book that made the story what is was and the character development was seriouslyIf I was rating this just as a standalone movie I would have given it a 6, but as a book adaptation it fell really short. The writers left out details from the book that made the story what is was and the character development was seriously lacking. One thing that Veronica Roth did so well in the book was showing the small acts of bravery (mentioned in the movie as the dauntless vision) that Tris performs but the movie left most of them out entirely, e.g., confronting Marcus, helping Edward when he is hurt. You find out very little about any character other than Tris and Four, which made their interactions feel disingenuous. Leaving these things out made the movie feel emotionally empty. Overall, the movie was disappointing as a book adaptation but decent if you have not read the books.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

4

nicholasbertJul 27, 2014

Since it seems like a must, I'll admit I haven't read the books. Not that they are literature anyway. But this allows me to give an unbiased review, not conditioned by my previous opinion of the books. One more thing about the books: any bookSince it seems like a must, I'll admit I haven't read the books. Not that they are literature anyway. But this allows me to give an unbiased review, not conditioned by my previous opinion of the books. One more thing about the books: any book is better than any adaptation, we've experienced this many times, and there still seem to be people who expect the movie to be at the same level, or even better, than the books. That has never happened.

Anyway, the film was yet another dumb post-apocalyptic action/romance mix, which I've never liked, although I have to admit it's not worse than the Hunger Games. Now, the premise was kind of good: the idea of the factions in particular. But, as always, they've managed to ruin everything with lousy, cheesy dialogue, which we've heard just as many times as many movies like this are out there, and with an immediate look at the characters' first introductions we could decide, right away, if they were good or evil. And the thing is, they stay that way till the end. I call that lack of character development.

The actors were good, I just didn't expect Kate Winslet to involve in such a stupid script. The cinematography was okay, I guess, but then again I'm not an expert in this genre so I might be wrong: from what I read in the reviews it sounds like the consensus veers towards bad special fx. Divergent is nothing special, as expected, and adds nothing to the already inextinguishable stockpile of action carap.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

SEROJMar 25, 2014

Haven't read the book but i'm pretty sure it's better than the movie i saw couple of days ago! Predictable,Strange and Dumb movie! Trust me you don't wanna see it... or at least more than once!

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

franissavioMar 23, 2014

This movie Divergent is a flop only because Kate Winslet is fully covered. Winslet may have won her 13 yr old daughter's accolade but not from 'your true fans'.

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

4

Tessara_VejganDec 4, 2014

Another bad movie released this year. Story is not very good. Acting is not very good. I was bored most of the time. This entire idea about how they are divided into factions is pretty stupid to me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

lazatoyApr 9, 2016

Divergent is the epitome of YA Novel based movie cliches, and what do they craft? Mediocre writing, poor character development, but, also a few interesting scenes.

Personally, I didn't enjoy it as much, but, I can sort of understand whyDivergent is the epitome of YA Novel based movie cliches, and what do they craft? Mediocre writing, poor character development, but, also a few interesting scenes.

Personally, I didn't enjoy it as much, but, I can sort of understand why some people might have.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

komarhomesterApr 15, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. If you are teenager or you acting like that you are welcome to see that film.
If you have protest soul and don't have enough brain muscle in your head you are welcome to see that film
Everything is trivial and understandable from first minute, o begging your pardon not from first, from 10s minute everything is understandable.
A good pretty girl who will safe our world one more, o dear, why they thing ( I'm talking about directors) that in every movie main characters need to safe our world could you make movie where people don't safe the world but still doing something good, is it possible ?
Good movie to see doing something as cleaning your house or playing some good game.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

Gamer2014Jul 26, 2014

Shailene Woodley is the worst choice for this movie and this is bad because she is near all the 2 hours . she is so **** dull unlike ashley judd (the mother) she was awesome . theo james is another bad choice . i only wish they do better nextShailene Woodley is the worst choice for this movie and this is bad because she is near all the 2 hours . she is so **** dull unlike ashley judd (the mother) she was awesome . theo james is another bad choice . i only wish they do better next time after they know their roles better . never read the book but its simply great story .… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

ruizvi10May 3, 2014

It is said that books are always better than than the movies, well in this case is true. Roth's effort in describing each character in the book is absolutely mismatched in the movie. They just scratched the surface when it comes to givingIt is said that books are always better than than the movies, well in this case is true. Roth's effort in describing each character in the book is absolutely mismatched in the movie. They just scratched the surface when it comes to giving relevance to each character. If you loved the book, you will get a feeling of disappointment once you have finished watching it, knowing that it could have been a much better movie.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

GriffMeliesAug 10, 2014

Although there could be something promising in the following films, this is just a been there and done that kind of film. Not the best. Shailene Woodley does an incredible job and will be quite the saving grace of this franchise. I give thisAlthough there could be something promising in the following films, this is just a been there and done that kind of film. Not the best. Shailene Woodley does an incredible job and will be quite the saving grace of this franchise. I give this film 38% of a good movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

Ripper89Mar 28, 2015

Divergent is a movie that has a very weird and a not very well explained plot that leaves you wondering what the hell is happening.

It seems like a cool idea but several things plotwise make absolutely no sense, however i believe if youDivergent is a movie that has a very weird and a not very well explained plot that leaves you wondering what the hell is happening.

It seems like a cool idea but several things plotwise make absolutely no sense, however i believe if you read the book, it would help with certain parts that just seem like they were picked out of a hat.

Personal belief: Divergent seems like a cool idea and had me hooked for about the first 30 minutes, after that, things go weird and a very unexpected change in the plot in the 2nd half of the movie just make it horrible and unbelievably stupid

4 out of 10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

All_ButTrU4Oct 6, 2022

Yet another allegorical dystopia YA book to movie adaptation with a brave female protagonist faced with a system that threatens her & her loved ones. It's a worn out story at this point but it's told in a rushed one note blockbuster fashion.Yet another allegorical dystopia YA book to movie adaptation with a brave female protagonist faced with a system that threatens her & her loved ones. It's a worn out story at this point but it's told in a rushed one note blockbuster fashion. Obviously seeking to ride the "Hunger Games " wave but like it's original novel form it's unveiled as a thin film enslaved to it's references. From it's costumes aka the clothes that distinguish each faction evoking the categorization in the classic " logans run to a society based on a sorting hat… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

FazhaMar 22, 2014

Full disclosure: I haven't read the books, but as someone who has read all of Harry Potter and The Hunger Games, I can say that this movie suffers from all of the pitfalls of every young adult novel series that followed either of them, thatFull disclosure: I haven't read the books, but as someone who has read all of Harry Potter and The Hunger Games, I can say that this movie suffers from all of the pitfalls of every young adult novel series that followed either of them, that it shamelessly copies the story beats and themes from those greater ones that came before. Divergent offers zero in the way of new or compelling ideas. The premise, that everyone in the future fits into one of exactly 5 psychological types (termed Factions by the film and book) is flimsy at best. The worst offenders are the 'Dauntless', the enforcers/protectors of all of Chicago. You might as well call that faction 'The Idiots' as all they seem to want to do is run around everywhere in dark clothing, climb everything in sight, and jump off of/onto moving trains (although perhaps in the future all trains don't have brakes in which case mea culpa). Why the heroine wants to be a part of that group is as big a mystery as why the Erudite faction (the scientist faction) wants to wipe out the Abegnation (the Amish, er, bureaucrat) faction.
Apart from the story, the actors chosen for the roles all looked like they were taken from The CW, and the art direction and set design looked decidedly 'B' movie, with not great special effects and set design that looks like it was ripped from a Canadian sci fi TV production house.
After seeing this I have no interest in reading the book and hope that the studio doesn't waste it's time and resources with a sequel vs working on something worthwhile.… Expand

6 of 12 users found this helpful66

All this user's reviews

3

EludiumQ36Aug 31, 2014

Long story short: too long, un-charismatic femme lead, and tired premise (you've seen it before). Limited demographic of interest: pre/early-teens, adults will yawn - repeatedly.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

3

MrRandomGuyApr 2, 2014

The movie suffered from obvious plot holes and there were things that just didn't make sense. There are 5 factions living in what appears to be post apocalyptic Chicago. The main character's faction is the one that runs the government. Yet weThe movie suffered from obvious plot holes and there were things that just didn't make sense. There are 5 factions living in what appears to be post apocalyptic Chicago. The main character's faction is the one that runs the government. Yet we have a random woman who doesn't fit in any faction (or at least they don't tell us what faction she's in) that plots and conspires to kill everyone in the ruling faction. What doesn't make sense about that is the woman appears to be the leader of everyone. If she's the leader wouldn't she be part of the faction she's trying to destroy?

That's just one out of many things that didn't make sense. Don't see this movie. You will be horribly disappointed.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

3

eagleeyevikingJul 29, 2014

Divergent arrives with a whimper in the crowded post - Harry Potter young adult franchises largely due to it's failure in generating thrills for most of the movie and it's overly derivative plot.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

3

ThatBrayKidMar 21, 2014

As a book reader, I have never been so disappointed in a book-to-movie conversion. Not only did they leave extremely important details out, but many important events occur out of order. Motivations for certain characters aren't evenAs a book reader, I have never been so disappointed in a book-to-movie conversion. Not only did they leave extremely important details out, but many important events occur out of order. Motivations for certain characters aren't even explained; even extremely important plot devices are not included. Many of these changes serve no purpose and hinder the emotional impact certain characters' decisions would otherwise have on the viewer. Book readers will generally be confused with the changes, and by the time the credits roll, most will be asking, "Why?"… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

3

diogomendesJul 24, 2014

"Divergent" has an outstanding cast but the director wastes them in a script that borrows heavily from Harry Potter, Twilight series and Hunger Games.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

3

movieclassJul 25, 2014

I prefer to and usually suspend story flaws when watching Sci-Fi or action movies BUT ... in this movie when Four and Be-a-Triss are caught by the enemy and they are NOT killed on-the-spot like all of the other Divergents .... I lost allI prefer to and usually suspend story flaws when watching Sci-Fi or action movies BUT ... in this movie when Four and Be-a-Triss are caught by the enemy and they are NOT killed on-the-spot like all of the other Divergents .... I lost all interest in the too long plot and too many weak characters. As in ... the movie characters. The acting is very strong but this all gets kinda lost in the weak story. I really found myself not caring about how the movie was going to end. I just wanted it to end like .... much sooner !… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

3

vikesh2206Nov 10, 2014

Divergent arrives with a whimper in the crowded post - Harry Potter young adult franchises largely due to it's failure in generating thrills for most of the movie and it's overly derivative plot.

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

3

daijahmetcalfSep 12, 2014

“Divergent” has filled many teenagers with misguided anticipation for months. Neil Burger, director of the films “The Illusionist” (2011) and “Limitless” (2011), has created this film based off of Veronica Roth’s novel. This film was supposed“Divergent” has filled many teenagers with misguided anticipation for months. Neil Burger, director of the films “The Illusionist” (2011) and “Limitless” (2011), has created this film based off of Veronica Roth’s novel. This film was supposed to combine gripping action and tender romance. These two factors were supposed to generate “…the next big thing (The Wire)”. But this film did not do enough to blow me off my seat. Shailene Woodley, the protagonist of this movie, plays Beatrice Prior. Her character is an awkward, daring, and combatant sixteen- year old who was born in a selfless faction called Abnegation. Despite her origins she chooses to live in Dauntless, a faction that does not know fear. There she consistently encounters and soon develops a relationship with Dauntless trainer Four, played by Theo James. However, despite the “unexpected” fight scenes and the “star crossed” co-stars, this film was repetitive, dull, and deficient to say the least.
The first element of this movie that already disappointed me was the setting. As shown in the commercials, this movie takes place in a futuristic dystopian society. I am not sure if anyone else remembers, but there has been a recent movie with a similar atmosphere. If you cannot remember, I will be happy to let you know that it was the “Hunger Games”. I do not think Neil Burger or Veronica Roth would want to hear this, but this movie is like the demoted version of the “Hunger Games”. Manohla Dargis points out that the movie does offer the standard aspects for a teen flick, “…but the similarities
between these young adult juggernauts are conspicuous in the extreme (The New York Times)”. In previews, the leaders of this society are attempting to place people in factions according to their identity. So it is already evident that there has to be some kind of distortion to break this cycle. This is where Shailene Woodley comes to the rescue. Since it is not a secret that she is Divergent, it is automatically clear that she is going to be the rebel of this film. This makes it even easier to realize where the movie is going. And the next place it shall go would also cause me more dissatisfaction.
Once Beatrice “unexpectedly” arrives in the dauntless faction, she meets the withheld and painfully attractive transfer trainer Four. As the movie goes on, they magically realize that they are meant for each other. Now I love romance as much as the next person, but I think it is safe to say that the young audience needs a break from it. Just like ice cream, too much of it can make one sick. If you look back in all the recent teen love films, I think a lot of people would agree that the whole “Romeo and Juliet” trend needs to have a break for just a while. Los Angeles Film Critic, Kenneth Turan, supports this topic when he states that the movie “…really drags out the romantic uncertainty element… (LA Times)”. But besides the cliché adoration, there is one more thing that really displeased me.
So far we have had numerous novel-based movies. And to name a few off the back we have had The Fault in Our Stars, Catching Fire, Hunger Games, The Host, and The Twilight Saga. Now that we have an addition of Divergent, I am beginning to question the passion behind these directors. When I see a consecutive line-up of novel-based films, I also see a lack of creativity. And the main thing that adds fuel to the fire is how agonizingly accurate this movie was to novel. If a director decides to make a movie that is based on a novel, they should go beyond the audiences’ expectations. This should really apply to adolescent films, which mostly consists of excitement and thrills. A movie should be so spectacular that a couple of glitches should not matter. Chicago Tribune Film Critic, Michael Phillips felt the same way when he said, “The movie version of ‘Divergent’ is no divergent. It goes along to get along. It’s tame, formulaic, and strictly by the book in every sense (Chicago Tribune)”. And I do not want to declare any director lazy if he or she creates a film from a work. But if you do go for it, go above and beyond the text. Because that will give some people the impression that you’re lethargic in originality.
Surprisingly enough, there is one positive thing that I could take away from this movie. This is the second movie that has portrayed young women as being independent, strong, and superior. This exposure is diluting the “damsel in distress” trend that is often seen on television and in movies. And a lot of girls need to be reminded that they could also do a lot in society. Not going against an entire totalitarian system, per say, but in other things like in their community or in their careers. I am also aware there is suppose to be a second movie next year. I just hope that the director will be more daring the next time around. . Because their boldness might just be what the Divergent movies need to really become “…the next big thing (The Wire)”.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

NerdConsultantMar 20, 2016

divergent really isn't much of anything it just feels like a bunch of sequences tied together with not much actually happening. it's almost like the film is a 2 hour prologue for the rest of the series which in itself wouldn't be too bad ifdivergent really isn't much of anything it just feels like a bunch of sequences tied together with not much actually happening. it's almost like the film is a 2 hour prologue for the rest of the series which in itself wouldn't be too bad if it was a least good set up, but man is this film boring. the characters fell stock and the plot feels too predictable at times and non sensible at others. also the cinematography and the design of the world feels like they are trying way too hard to be The Hunger Games.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

royphishoohApr 28, 2015

Extremely derivative movie with poor acting and dull story lines. As Dogboy observes this is definitely one for the Twilight fans. Why didn't they build a metro station next to the Jock faction's headquarters? All that macho train-leaping wasExtremely derivative movie with poor acting and dull story lines. As Dogboy observes this is definitely one for the Twilight fans. Why didn't they build a metro station next to the Jock faction's headquarters? All that macho train-leaping was extremely silly.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

DokaluJan 15, 2015

This movie is boring, stupid, just for teenagers, has stereotype protagonists and the whole thing is just horrible. I really hope the book is much better than this extremely long cliched sh*t. The worst part is that now that I saw thisThis movie is boring, stupid, just for teenagers, has stereotype protagonists and the whole thing is just horrible. I really hope the book is much better than this extremely long cliched sh*t. The worst part is that now that I saw this stupidity, I have the moral obligation to watch the sequel...… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

zuratusJul 19, 2015

This movie is a complete waste of time, money and resources. I'm totally disappointed, the actors were good, but the director didn't know how to use their talent.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

reviewfrom19842Dec 29, 2016

Divergent is a rip-off of both The Hunger Games and Harry Potter. Horribly written, and a bad story makes Divergent forgivable and boring. The acting is decent and it has it's moments but Divergent is still a sh*t movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

AWESOM-0Jun 12, 2020

The cast is good and the acting isn’t bad but since I haven’t read the novels I can only assume there was serious errors in the screenwriting/adaption. Or the novels were terrible. It’s completely predictable and the sci-fi aspect of it is soThe cast is good and the acting isn’t bad but since I haven’t read the novels I can only assume there was serious errors in the screenwriting/adaption. Or the novels were terrible. It’s completely predictable and the sci-fi aspect of it is so basic and not really thought through at all it’s just ends up being meh. It’s truly on the CW level of creative work and not the high end CW (not saying much).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

mrmonsterAug 10, 2014

This movie was a complete waste of time. It was nothing more than a knockoff of The Hunger Games, only it didn't have the suspense, the action, the plot, or the Jennifer Lawrence of the Hunger Games. Overall, this movie is just a pointlessThis movie was a complete waste of time. It was nothing more than a knockoff of The Hunger Games, only it didn't have the suspense, the action, the plot, or the Jennifer Lawrence of the Hunger Games. Overall, this movie is just a pointless movie mean to cash in on a book for teenage girls.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

NFWJun 25, 2015

DIVERGENT is an annoying, shameful, and utterly vile excuse for science fiction that has also managed to produce one of the worst romances in recent memory. I honestly can't see this appealing to a anyone other than High School girls.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

francisrgoMar 24, 2014

"Divergent" is based on Veronica Roth's young adult series of the same name. The story she has created is very complex and makes readers think about their own "self" and others. Each character in the book are given their own spotlight and"Divergent" is based on Veronica Roth's young adult series of the same name. The story she has created is very complex and makes readers think about their own "self" and others. Each character in the book are given their own spotlight and reader's get to learn more about their traits. My biggest issue of the movie is how they rushed the character development. Even though the movie is already running at 143mins, they could have at least done a more cohesive introduction. You really don't get to know the rest of the characters except for the main protagonist, Tris. What is worst about the movie is that the order of occurrences from the book to the movie are jumbled. It is completely out of order and some scenes they just added. The script could have been so much better and the book has so much potential to be made into a movie.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

2

talisencrwSep 24, 2014

Decent, but nothing more. Its buildup was fine but it then descended into a shoot-em-up, which must have made Republicans and the NRA happy. It's a half hour too long, given epic treatment when it deserves far less, and the dialogue'sDecent, but nothing more. Its buildup was fine but it then descended into a shoot-em-up, which must have made Republicans and the NRA happy. It's a half hour too long, given epic treatment when it deserves far less, and the dialogue's terrible, as if a high school student had written it. I'll pass on any sequels. And the poster's hilarious--Four transcends his fear of heights, just to get Tris' butt in his face. I hope for his sake she didn't have tacos for lunch.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

Pacific_InfernoMar 22, 2014

I wish I could write this independently of the novel, but I can't. There are omissions and edits all over the place, which can be forgivable if there aren't major plot points or essential to character development, but this film fails toI wish I could write this independently of the novel, but I can't. There are omissions and edits all over the place, which can be forgivable if there aren't major plot points or essential to character development, but this film fails to deliver any reason to attach to any character or the world around it.

If you're thinking about seeing this movie, just buy the book; you can probably get through it in the same 2.5 hours you'd waste at this uninspired film bastardization.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

2

BrontebooApr 18, 2014

I read the book before going to see this film and really enjoyed it. Despite the generic, futuristic teen plot it was still a good read. However as someone who read the book I found the film to be a disappointment. Much of the plot had beenI read the book before going to see this film and really enjoyed it. Despite the generic, futuristic teen plot it was still a good read. However as someone who read the book I found the film to be a disappointment. Much of the plot had been removed or changed and I understand poetic license but some of it was just unnecessary. It missed out some huge plot points that made it difficult to connect with any of the characters on screen. However I do think the addition scenes with Kate Winslet were helpful to the plot and most of the casting was spot on.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

Michael_FormanMay 31, 2014

A simplistic revolution plot stretched out to a painful 2.5 hours with no gratifying resolution. The hour spent watching the protagonist train was filler that never connected with the plot It felt less like a movie and more like a TNT miniseries.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

BroyaxMay 28, 2023

Quasiment 2h20 la bouse mais je n’ai craqué qu’au bout de 2h ! et j’en suis fier… ou pas ! Beaucoup trop naïve et superficielle, cette fable communiste ! (chacun dans ses kolkhozes et tout ira bien) malgré une mise en scène efficace (c’estQuasiment 2h20 la bouse mais je n’ai craqué qu’au bout de 2h ! et j’en suis fier… ou pas ! Beaucoup trop naïve et superficielle, cette fable communiste ! (chacun dans ses kolkhozes et tout ira bien) malgré une mise en scène efficace (c’est filmé correctement, ce qui est rare de nos jours et l’entrâinement des recrues est relativement amusant).

Une héroïne, c’était pourtant une excellente idée, j’adore les héroïnes… sauf quand elles ont une tronche de thon. Mais quelle andouille s’est occupé du casting pour choisir une telle mocheté ? surtout qu’elle joue comme un pied, cette cruche !

Le monde décrit ici manque également de crédibilité et de cohérence. Qu’y a-t’il à l’extérieur de la clôture ? on ne sait pas. Quoi, il fallait regarder jusqu’à la fin pour le savoir ? je dois être un divergent alors, car je m’insurge devant une telle lenteur de film à la con, bien que la ‘divergente’ à sale gueule soit bonnasse quand même. Mais bon voilà quoi.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

Naruto78909Apr 22, 2018

Divergent is what lionsgate made and like 90% of there movies its awful bad characters boring effects and just terrible acting divergent fits the lionsgate trash they are always making

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

zNeverSleepingOct 17, 2020

Sorry, it wont work.

Por mais que a premissa não fosse má, a condução do filme para com a mesma é muito mal feita. Primeiro: onde está o desenvolvimento de personagem? Segundo: Devo desligar completamente meu cérebro para me divertir aquiSorry, it wont work.

Por mais que a premissa não fosse má, a condução do filme para com a mesma é muito mal feita. Primeiro: onde está o desenvolvimento de personagem? Segundo: Devo desligar completamente meu cérebro para me divertir aqui quando qualquer lógica não existe? Terceiro: pra que 5 facções se 3 são figurantes? Quarto: É claro que haveria um romance forçado, senão não seria para o publico pré-adolescente.

A principio, me perguntei: Porque essa personagem é tão vazia? Logo me deparei com mais um clichê, bem parecido com crepúsculo. Vamos pegar uma garota que não tem nada de especial, mas algo acontece que reviravolta a vida da mesma. Isso n'ao lembra alguma coisa? É como se eles quisessem porque quisessem identificar essa personagem com o publico alvo. Ela é uma divergente, mas tá. Porque? É como se o roteiro tivesse preguiça de desenvolvê-la além disso. No final ficamos nos perguntando porque ela é quem é, já que nada mais faz sentido. Ela não é carismática, não é inteligente - até que o roteiro precise disso; não é bonita, carece de habilidades - ela vira a "filha do john wick", mas só quando o roteiro exige que ela seja, pra não focar pra traz. Fora todas as conveniências. Alguém me diz qual é dessa de "regras novas". Serio, assim do nada? Se não desligarmos o cérebro aqui, fica difícil se entreter.

Os personagens são o cumulo da fraquice. Miles Teller mais uma vez é posto no papel do antipático, e aqui forçam tanto o ódio pelos telespectadores que acaba sendo totalmente anti-climático e ineficiente. A protagonista não tem nada de especial, e aquelas frases de efeito são uma vergonha alheia que eu nunca mais vou esquecer na minha vida. E o seu parceiro até tenta, mas não vai muito diferente da mesma.

O desenvolvimento do mundo é nulo, como se tudo girasse em torno da protagonista. O uso de clichês e conveniências vai além do normal, quebrando qualquer senso de perigo e suspense. A morte dos pais, por exemplo, soou extremamente desnatural, só pra se livrar mesmo.

Enfim, eu poderia ficar falando mal desse filme por muito mais tempo, mas vou fazer algo que preste da minha vida.

Audio: English, with portuguese subtitles. Q60T 50' TV Speakers
Quality: 1080p SDR [PrimeVideo]… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

1

MovieFan123Mar 29, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Divergent a movie I thought was actually gonna be pretty good was just horrible. Okay first they spent more money on the sound track than actual character development. You don't even learn any of the characters names until the movie is almost over. Also there are many parts in the book that aren't in the movie. It made the book very good and gave more explanation. Also the whole feels like its on fast forward because 3 minutes into the movie your already at the test and then 20 minutes into the movie the characters are in initiation. In the book it took way more time and explained everything. Also Peter wasn't as sinister and evil and we didn't no his name until the end of the movie. Also they give no motive for Al's suicide and his character isn't talked about for the rest of the movie. We really didn't even know his name. The only good thing about this movie is the soundtrack which helps the movie's pacing. In conclusion this is one of the worst movies I've seen in a while and I would be surprised if it doesn't take home at least one Razzie Award.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

1

rachiebabieMar 25, 2014

This is a rental folks! The editing of this movie will put you right to sleep! It's just not compelling or emotional, and it is WAY TOO LONG. I found myself looking at my watch many, many times. Now if you're younger than 17, this might justThis is a rental folks! The editing of this movie will put you right to sleep! It's just not compelling or emotional, and it is WAY TOO LONG. I found myself looking at my watch many, many times. Now if you're younger than 17, this might just be your anthem as it's all angsty and full of rebellion. The concept is too simple to be complex. We get it, you're "Different" and "different" is BAD. The world is reminiscent of an amish utopian set in the future, but it looks like it takes place in past....I've seen this world before, it's called The Hunger Games, but at least in the hunger games, their amish lifestyle is juxtaposed by the futuristic lifestyle of the rich. Anywho, if I had to give this movie a grade it would be a solid "ZZZZZZZ" for SNORES because that's the only feeling this movie elicited.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

1

mek12Apr 10, 2016

I do not believe that any of the movies did the books the justice it deserved as well as the not being well cast for all of the main characters. I do not have much to say the movies are not worth watching if you truly read the books.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

mppSep 22, 2018

While staying with friends I stumbled into the family room where this was on the screen. I honestly thought I was watching some low-budget Sci-Fi channel or WB TV series--low quality production, cheesy, formulaic, predictable, etc etc. ButWhile staying with friends I stumbled into the family room where this was on the screen. I honestly thought I was watching some low-budget Sci-Fi channel or WB TV series--low quality production, cheesy, formulaic, predictable, etc etc. But it kept going on and on and on, until I finally asked when this "show" ended. I do have to give one star to Shailene Woodley, who is a top-rate, though much underrated, actress, evidenced by her solid performance in "Divergent" despite awful writing and an even worse concept.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

ViewJarDec 19, 2019

Round about four years after I had read the book and almost forgot everything about it I saw the movie. Since a lot of time has passed, I won't judge how near the movie is to the book.
The music in this movie most time seems very imposed andRound about four years after I had read the book and almost forgot everything about it I saw the movie. Since a lot of time has passed, I won't judge how near the movie is to the book.
The music in this movie most time seems very imposed and I also don't quite like the idea with the different fractions. The main character is pretty okay, also if there would have been better cast options, but that is the case for all characters, because none of them is played well. The world and the costumes look pretty cool, although they are a little bit over the line sometimes. The biggest problem isn't, as i thought in the beginning, the action, which is bad, but the character development and the dialogues are even worse. Almost all characters are two-dimensional, exchangeable and not interesting at all. And the dialogues mostly seem pretty flat and unnatural.
If you are interested in the story, I would recommend to read the book, rather than watching this. Because everything I remember from the book is way better than the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

DearDearMar 25, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Divergent was the first time I've walked out of a movie in nearly three decades of going to the cinema. The Hunger Games films, while far-fetched and cliched at times, have worked so far because they have featured strong scripts, great pacing, genuine dramatic tension, interesting characters, and good acting. The dystopian society presented in Divergent, with its personality-based caste system, is intriguing. Unfortunately, it is populated by one-dimensional characters who spout shallow, vapid dialogue and act in incomprehensibly stupid ways. Tris Pryor, the heroine, joins Gryff... er, sorry, Dauntless, the Faction we're told act as the police, protecting the citizens of post-apocalyptic Chicago. But instead the brave folk of Dauntless seem to be a pack of moronic adrenaline junkies who run around everywhere and climb everything in sight for no discernible reason. New recruits to Dauntless, straight out of the Faction-choosing ceremony, are expected to jump onto a moving train and then jump off of it onto a roof with no warning or training. Exactly what purpose does setting new recruits up for nasty injuries on their very first day serve? Then they're made to beat each other up Fight Club-style. They're warned that if they don't perform well, they'll be cast out to fend for themselves as Factionless on the cruel streets, but they don't seem to be given any form of structured combat training to help them become better fighters. Oh, and they all get tattoos at one point, because apparently having a tattoo means you're a BAMF and no one will mess with you. It's like something a twelve-year-old more concerned with coolness than any sort of internal logic dreamed up. So what if there's no reason for the police to engage in random acts of parkour like a bunch of Spider-man wannabes? It's cool! Did I also mention that the cardboard standees on display in the lobby of the theatre had more dimension than the actual characters in the film? Tris is a perfect Mary Sue and everyone else is a one-note stereotype. Christina, who was born into Huffle...er, Candor, the honest Faction, but chose Dauntless, always says whatever is on her mind. The boy who was born into Raven...er, Erudite, the scientific Faction, is a Spockian sort who randomly cites statistics during target practice. It's obvious from the first twenty minutes that Erudite are going to turn out to be the villains, and, frankly, I find the portrayal of scientists and intellectuals as cold, shrewd, and evil to be deeply offensive.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

0

dogboySep 2, 2014

This movie is complete drivel. It is made for people who thought Twilight was a great movie and the Hunger Games a masterpiece. If this is you, you may like this movie. For everyone else it just plain sucks.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

0

EraldSep 4, 2014

It's simple: if you want to see a good movie, go somewhere else. This is a terrible product, made to please those teenagers full of hormones and very little time to see or read something good.
That girl "Woodley" reminds me of a fat uncle IIt's simple: if you want to see a good movie, go somewhere else. This is a terrible product, made to please those teenagers full of hormones and very little time to see or read something good.
That girl "Woodley" reminds me of a fat uncle I had and the love story... soooooo bland.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

0

ThatsameguyApr 26, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Best movie ever, I loved it sooooooooooooooooo much, the book is **** but the movie is amazing, you must watch it in the movie theater. The protagonist is so beautiful, inteligent and smart, I LOVE HER… Expand

1 of 12 users found this helpful111

All this user's reviews

0

bmaster4616Apr 5, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. *WARNING SPOILERS*
Holy cluster **** Let me first start by saying that this movie was one of the worse movie ever. The writers obviously didn't even pretend to make it realistic in anyway. The makers must just wanted to make money out of this and had no interest in making it a quality movie. This cliched , idiotic premise, and cheesy filled movie just kept crumbling down as the movie dragged along. The whole premise of creating five factions to promote peace is probably thee or the second dumbest idea I've ever heard. Creating fractions automatically creates tension. This is not even the tip of the iceberg.

We get to the test to decide what fraction you should be in (rip off of Harry potter by the way). The person is told its a test and given a drug that enhances your dream world. Giving you a test to choice what to do. Any capable mental person would obviously know its not a dream. Maybe the drug gives the dreamer a huge sense of fear...can we explain this please.

The word Divergent is for someone who has no fear, which in fact is totally unrealistic. This allows a different prospective ideas and ideals that span across each fraction. The thing that makes no sense is the fact that they allows people to jump to a different fraction. Isn't that almost like being divergent. Tell me I'm wrong please.

The protectors was this rag tag group of people who jump out of trains while moving, that jump into them while moving, and do all this crazy stuff. The brilliant creators has this smart idea to put this out of control bunch of people in charge of the safety and security of the "colony".

Talking about the fractions. Abnegations hold office and are the leaders of the society. The problem I have here is the fact that they really don't do much. It seems like they're not really in charge at all. The movie doesn't even explain anything about the process of making law. Do the abnegations make law, give it to Candors, and then the leaders signs it or something? Also the leaders live in one of the **** places in the whole society.

Now lets jump back on track.
The Ceremony:
You have these young kids cut themselves (which could cause infection and what knows what) to decide what fraction to go into. What reason exactly? To make it look cool or something? Can anyone example the significance of it? It doesn't explain that at all. Why could you just thrown the **** or anything else?

Now we get to the middle of the movie where it wasn't that bad. It started off shaky but turned to be a pretty good movie. It was at about a 3.5/5 at one point until of course it started to fall apart at a colossal rate.

The movie does a great job showing this society that's eaten itself apart and it's moments away from falling apart. We see get this test to determine if you have what it takes to be in the fraction. I understand that most actors don't know how to fight and I get that. Though you would think that they would bring in trainers that can actually teach someone how to fight. Woodley looked like a ****ing idiot out there. She was punching like she was Parkinson's disease. It was as if she was trying to have a **** fight with a labradoodle. It was quite embarrassing. Then you have this weird hand position of the hands that would never ****ing work. Now I'm not an expert in fighting (though I do do karate). That hand position will not protect **** and will actually cause your hand to come back and pop you in the face. Okay yes the position of a person doesn't determine how bad a movie is. Stick with me.

So then we go through test after test of getting to know someone. The tests were pretty awesome and seemed to be a highlight. Though you have Woodley; who basically fails at every test, all of a sudden gets this holly light in her. she didn't receive any major help. Tris moves up the ranks and makes the cut.
Yeepy!
You don't really see any of the outcasts though. They are just thrown out without an acknowledgement. Whatever at this point.

One side note:
The movie was extremely sappy, but i should have know that coming in.

The Ending:

Then the ending starts to roll around and all hell of idiocy happens. We first learn about this "army" that four shows us. You know kids out there and few people of an apocalyptic outcome. When you see an army that's being made up and constructed; will you please tell someone besides your girlfriend. You would think that if there's a rumor of an overthrow; that some one would get a hold of it. They would then get this information and do something about it. You would also think that Abnegation would confront the issue. They're the leaders of the control for god's sake.

Four then comes to the conclusion that they are building an army on the sole mariet of Erudite bringing in supplies in to Dauntlet's place. Maybe the leaders would have killed him for bringing up questions. I would tell you to go to other fractions. Another problem could have occurred.
What if they stopped him?
A. but then how did Tris get out so easily.

Maybe they wouldn't have listened to him?

I'm pretty sure when they hear this "rumor" of an overthrow; they would have listened. The fraction to go to would have been Abnegation. That's the exact fraction trying to get wiped out. Also why in god's name would the Dauntless be on the side of the erudite in the first place. What do they get out of this? Would they become military "slaves" of the erudites? Why get rid of a peaceful people like the abnegation? They seem to be hated throughout the movie with no explanation.

So now the army that's created by this serum that makes their own people turn into "zombie". These zombies kill and don't ask questions. The premise is the fact that Divergents don't get affected by it. Why? No explanation is need I guess.

Let's get the fan fact of why the movie was one of the worse movies I've seen. The decisions of the characters was like a five year old was making them. These decisions were dosed in cliches and lit with some bad acting.

Let me combine both of them in my next paragraph. I'll just start off this section by examining the ending other. I'll be here all day if it was the whole movie. The audiences watch as the two main characters pretend to be zombies while Daughtless takes over the homes in Abnegation.

First, they watch one of the people shot as they walk by them. You're a zombie! Please act like it. They then run in Triss's house while screaming their heads off for her parents. There are people outside killing other people. They can hear you and obviously you're not a zombie if you're screaming your head off.

Later they get stoppped by the head guys of Daughtless. They have their cliched laugh of the warrior in Four looking like an mindless idiot. They then all of a sudden notice that he's Divergent. The cliched "everyone has a gun and everyone is pointing at someone" occurs. Stalemate right? Well it didn't have to be if the dumb **** would have just shot both of them in the head from point blank range. They get caught and another cliche appears. "The main character gets away. The friend or family member gets caught". A cliche comes yet again. The "hero is saved from some random person out of nowhere".

Tris goes with her mom into the city to find the group. We get to a part where they are confronted and they kill the evil people. Cool. They come to the end of the alleyway, where the mom stops her and said "cover me". From what! The end of the alleyway was nothing but grass and open space.

Cliche alert again: "no I got this, cover me" type **** comes from Triss. What the F? Why the hell do you need to be covered? A truck then comes around the corner and people start shooting. So did they hear that? If yes then why didn't you just ****ing wait in the alley and let the car go by? I don't get that concept at all. Let's just run into the middle of the field by yourself, so your mom has to save your ass and get killed (cliche by the way). The mom dies and she finds the group. They then go stop the slaughter before it kills all of Abnegation. Tris finds guns on the people that she shot. Apparently "nobody investigates shots getting fired". There was a lot of compotion around the village. I do get that. Though the only gun battle was between those two. I'm also wondering "what the hell happened to the people that were shooting at them from the truck". Did they just not want to pursue the attackers or something? I'm just confused how she was able to get weapons from the people she just attacked? Whatever, lets move on. So the group gets to the place where this program for the zombies are taking place. Which seems to be randomly in dauntless's place and not Erudite's. Why, I don't know? Cliche alert. The dad is responsible this time. "I will distract then and kill them because were running out of time". He runs out and kills the guards by himself. What the flying **** You have three people with guns and there are only four guards. Just have one person shoot two of those ****ers. Lets run out and get killed while only killing two of them. It was like something from a parody. Tris looks towards the dad and said "what are you doing dad?" or "Are you okay dad?". I don't remember. It was one of the two Well the camera pans back to the dad with like seven bullet holes and blood flowing from his mouth. You know he was probably just resting from the hard day. *sigh*. Tris tells everyone to stay there to protect his brother for some reason and goes on alone (cliched). Why? I don't know? She finds four who's staring in one direction like a zombie. She ask "are you okay?". Well he has a mindless stare and has ivies attached to him. He must be fine. Cliche alert "The person can snap out of anything for love type **** occurs and the both of them stop the killing of Abnegation. Okay, so now you have the leader of the bad guys in your hands...who did all this crazy **** and you don't off the **** Fine, morals. Ending her life could have solved everything. Let's say you didn't kill her. The threat is over. You can just kidnap her and give her up to the other fractions. Put her up for trial or something. Even if one of the fractions is still on her side. There's three against one. Kill off the two other fractions and you'll be fine. You don't need to leave for no good reason. Lets say that Dauntless has all the weapons. Well that was an idiotic premise in the first place.This stupid premise goes back to the idiotic premise of having five fractions. Just whatever on the whole premise right now. This movie was just a cluster **** of utter proportions. Again this is a good portion of the cluster ****ness. I would be here all day trying to go through all of it. P.S. This is a rip off of Harry Potter and Hunger Games. Ask me if you want to know why. A solid 1/10. My lowest rating of a blockbuster movie ever. Forgot a couple of things. If you're going to build a wall from an enemy. Please build it around your crops so people won't steal **** or burn them down. Also when those "zombies" became good again. You can use those people to fight off the rest. There's no point of leaving. Also to those who liked it. Pay attention more.… Expand

9 of 19 users found this helpful910

All this user's reviews

0

judyburnsideMar 21, 2014

DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE. If you have read the book you will be severely disappointed at the lack of crucial characters and events, the terrible casting, and the bland acting. Based on the lack of characters in the first movie, it is impossibleDO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE. If you have read the book you will be severely disappointed at the lack of crucial characters and events, the terrible casting, and the bland acting. Based on the lack of characters in the first movie, it is impossible for them to make a second. There are revolutionary characters that they left out! If you have not read the book, you will find yourself confused and unsatisfied at the poor character development choppy and hard to follow. I can only pray that John Green will not let producers butcher his novel The Fault in Our Stars as much as they did this one.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

0

movies87Mar 22, 2014

First things first, this movie is ridiculously long. 2 1/2 hours movie that goes nowhere for the first 2 hours is quite the JOB for a moviegoer. Could have easily been a 1 1/2 hour movie. Movie drags on with little to no plot. VeryFirst things first, this movie is ridiculously long. 2 1/2 hours movie that goes nowhere for the first 2 hours is quite the JOB for a moviegoer. Could have easily been a 1 1/2 hour movie. Movie drags on with little to no plot. Very predictable. Save your money and just watch the trailer. Plenty of other movies to watch.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

0

evearcherMay 3, 2014

Wow this movie was as boring as predicted, the acting is not that bad....but not very interesting. It looks like a cheap cash grab "hunger games" wanna be movie. Stay away until it comes out on DVD for a buck.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

NdaulatanaMay 10, 2014

I honestly did not like it. They did not show the important part and not even mention important characters. Dont watch it dont spend your money. When i saw it it ruined my day.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

0

LazerfistOct 2, 2014

Terrible...just...awful. Do not spend money on this movie, and make sure that you have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BETTER TO DO for 2.5 hours. Horrible acting. The lead has resting **** face the whole time, and she is just entirely awkward. The restTerrible...just...awful. Do not spend money on this movie, and make sure that you have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BETTER TO DO for 2.5 hours. Horrible acting. The lead has resting **** face the whole time, and she is just entirely awkward. The rest of the cast is still pretty bad, but not as bad as her. Avoid eating anything while she is doing her sob scene; something happened to her face that just aint right. Ashley Judd, Kate Winslet...I expect more from you; why are you associating yourself with this crap.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

Toten79Jul 28, 2020

Sorry, can´t watch this Twilight emo, lfick-chicks anymore. I lasted about half an hour, when these "Dauntings" teens started to run and climb all over the city... I think only a 15 year old girl could watch this flicks until the end...

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Divergent

User Reviews