Focus Features | Release Date: November 22, 2017
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 351 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
276
Mixed:
56
Negative:
19
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
TVJerryDec 26, 2017
A film that's mostly people sitting in rooms talking relies on good writing and strong performances to make it effective. Luckily, this film has both. Sure, Gary Oldman nails the look and style of Winston Churchill, but he goes beyond that toA film that's mostly people sitting in rooms talking relies on good writing and strong performances to make it effective. Luckily, this film has both. Sure, Gary Oldman nails the look and style of Winston Churchill, but he goes beyond that to create a character with complex presence and emotional depth. If you saw DUNKIRK, then you know about the massive effort to evacuate the British army from the coastal town in France, while the Nazis are threatening their destruction. This film takes place behind the scenes in London, when Churchill strives to save the troops, while planning to lead Britain into the war….all despite massive political opposition. Oldman is in almost every scene and his charisma (both as the Prime Minister and as an actor) carries the weight with award-worthy skill. He brings this challenging situation to life and makes the circumstances much more enthralling than you might expect. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
DukeJonFeb 23, 2018
An exciting and moving film that is also a testament to the acting ability of Gary Oldman. The editing and cutting between scenes is masterfully done, particularly the "looking up into the sky" moments. Some very moving sequences,An exciting and moving film that is also a testament to the acting ability of Gary Oldman. The editing and cutting between scenes is masterfully done, particularly the "looking up into the sky" moments. Some very moving sequences, particularly the speech at the end and the section showing the defenders of Calais. A great film. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
IraSNov 26, 2017
"Darkest Hour" is excellently written, cast, and acted.

It depicts the desparate "behind the scenes" British parliamentary activity as the Germany was defeating the UK and France during what became known as the Battle of France or the Fall
"Darkest Hour" is excellently written, cast, and acted.

It depicts the desparate "behind the scenes" British parliamentary activity as the Germany was defeating the UK and France during what became known as the Battle of France or the Fall of France in May/June 1940. "Darkest Hour" concentrates on Winston Churchill's actions leading up to Operation Dynamo - the evacuation of British soldiers (and the soldiers of other Allies as well) and the British and French armies were crumbling before the German onslaught. I recommend reading these Wikipedia entries before watching "Darkest Hour":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_1940_War_Cabinet_crisis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkirk_evacuation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Ariel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cycle
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
10
AxgrinderDec 23, 2017
The movie covers the first few weeks after Winston Churchill becomes Prime Minister of the UK, and Nazi Germany's invasion of France. No battle scenes, guns or explosions. Just great acting, and an interesting story that makes you wonder whatThe movie covers the first few weeks after Winston Churchill becomes Prime Minister of the UK, and Nazi Germany's invasion of France. No battle scenes, guns or explosions. Just great acting, and an interesting story that makes you wonder what the world might have become had England capitulated. One of this year's finest movies. Kudos to both Gary Oldman and Lily James (who plays Churchill's secretary). Makes you want to know more about this amazing man, who is an English icon, but almost completely unknown to younger generations of Americans. Makes for a nice companion piece to Dunkirk, without the confusing timelines. Ben Mendelsohn's portrayal of the speech impaired King George VI is both credible and strikingly different from the impression given in The Kings Speech. The underground war room London is now a museum open to the public and well worth seeing if you have the chance. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
masterchief247Dec 27, 2017
This was a very emotional inspiring movie about a man who overcame opposition and failure to save his country from destruction. It did have some slow moments, but they did not overshadow the good. This movie is what is good, right, andThis was a very emotional inspiring movie about a man who overcame opposition and failure to save his country from destruction. It did have some slow moments, but they did not overshadow the good. This movie is what is good, right, and sacred about our society. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
MattBrady99Dec 31, 2017
"Will you stop interrupting me while I am interrupting you!"

'Darkest Hour' is this years 'Lincoln'. Both films star a well respected actor who is unrealizable and brings one of the best performances of their career. History sure dose repeat
"Will you stop interrupting me while I am interrupting you!"

'Darkest Hour' is this years 'Lincoln'. Both films star a well respected actor who is unrealizable and brings one of the best performances of their career. History sure dose repeat itself.

It's quite shocking more actors have played Winston Churchill than James Bond, Spider-Man, and Doctor Who. Lets not forget we had another movie about Winston Churchill early this year named 'Churchill' staring Brain Cox. However, my excitement for Oldman to play the British bull dog was high, because I knew he's gonna stick his teeth into this meaty role, and he sure did. Gary Oldman was absolutely terrific and not once will you guess it's him. The level of humility, fear, and rage Oldman brought to role makes you see another side to Churchill. Almost like an inside look. He continues to be a legend and this is his finest hour.

Ben Mendelsohn, Kristin Scott Thomas, and Lily James all delivered solid performances in supporting roles. Each character has a major role in Churchill's life. Leaving a strong impression on me.

Without giving away too much, but there's a great scene in the film where Churchill goes onto the subway for the first time. He meets regular people and listens to them in person. It's probably one of the best scenes I've seen this year.

The cinematography was really stunning and Joe Wright directs the hell out of it. Even through some scenes go on a little bit too long for it's runtime. There's a lot of dialogue heavy scenes which may turn some people off, which it did for me at times.

Overall rating: Any British or history buff will really enjoy this one. It's a well crafted movie that's doesn't feel like one of those TV made films you sometimes get.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
moviecritic68Feb 21, 2018
Took me awhile to go see this film but it was worth the wait. I'm kind of a history buff so my rating may be high for some's liking but personally I thought it is worthy of it's nominations for the Oscars. Outstanding lead role portrayed asTook me awhile to go see this film but it was worth the wait. I'm kind of a history buff so my rating may be high for some's liking but personally I thought it is worthy of it's nominations for the Oscars. Outstanding lead role portrayed as was supporting roles. The negative raters should be ignored ... probably hated history class in school :) Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
MustardaFeb 26, 2018
Churchill was a very complex character, very difficult to deal with like most genius normally are. His strong personality and drive are probably responsible for saving England and the movie is very clear portraying that. The performance isChurchill was a very complex character, very difficult to deal with like most genius normally are. His strong personality and drive are probably responsible for saving England and the movie is very clear portraying that. The performance is Oscar level by Gary Oldman, but Kristin Scott Thomas is also brilliant, as was the real-life wife. A very emotional movie, carefully directed and powerfully acted, one of my year favorites and a must-see for any History lover! Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
antcrtJan 28, 2018
The journey from confidence, to doubt, to purpose is so well handled, that even those who know everything about Dunkerque, Churchill and his speech will find inspiration at the end of this movie. What an amazing accomplishment.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
BrianMcCriticDec 22, 2017
I'm a sucker for films about historical leaders during war time. Darkest Hour was riveting throughout with the performance of a lifetime by Gary Oldman. He is a sure fire Oscar nominee and has a real shot at winning. The film didn't hit me asI'm a sucker for films about historical leaders during war time. Darkest Hour was riveting throughout with the performance of a lifetime by Gary Oldman. He is a sure fire Oscar nominee and has a real shot at winning. The film didn't hit me as much as Spielberg's Lincoln did but it's not far behind. A Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
moviemitch96Dec 24, 2017
Yes, it is a by-the-numbers biopic, but that's easily forgiven thanks largely in part to the stellar performances, obviously most notably from Gary Oldman's commanding lead performance. I will truly be stunned if he doesn't win the Oscar forYes, it is a by-the-numbers biopic, but that's easily forgiven thanks largely in part to the stellar performances, obviously most notably from Gary Oldman's commanding lead performance. I will truly be stunned if he doesn't win the Oscar for this! Even supporting turns from Kristen Scott Thomas and Ben Mendelsohn to name a couple others make the film all the more worthwhile. Overall, it's definitely a superbly acted and gripping look at Winston Churchill and the events that surrounded him during WWII. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
9
yosemiteJan 9, 2018
This is a borderline great film. I gave it a 9 only because I don't know how close to actual history it clung to. Gary Oldman's portrayal of Churchill is Oscar worthy. He is in 90% of the film and is just great. The photography is spot on asThis is a borderline great film. I gave it a 9 only because I don't know how close to actual history it clung to. Gary Oldman's portrayal of Churchill is Oscar worthy. He is in 90% of the film and is just great. The photography is spot on as is the directing and film editing. Telling the story through the eyes of Churchill's secretary was a good choice. The theater I went to seated 36 people. About 25 showed up and they were all "over 60". Does the under 60 group even know who Winston Churchill was ??? Expand
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
9
ProteusDec 25, 2017
Oldman. Makes. Churchill. Lovable. See the movie for that alone. Merry Christmas.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
9
section20mi6Feb 23, 2018
With Gary Oldman's never-seen-before stellar performance, Darkest Hour certainly reminded us how politicians during wartime used to be honorable and righteous. The power of language throughout the film is a dominant driven force to underscoreWith Gary Oldman's never-seen-before stellar performance, Darkest Hour certainly reminded us how politicians during wartime used to be honorable and righteous. The power of language throughout the film is a dominant driven force to underscore the imminent danger that faces one nation and to boost morale in the people during extreme circumstances. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
10
GinaKDec 12, 2017
Although this film is very traditional, I really enjoyed it. Gary Oldman gives a great performance as Churchill and he has an excellent supporting cast. In its way, it is a propaganda film, but it is also solid and engrossing in itsAlthough this film is very traditional, I really enjoyed it. Gary Oldman gives a great performance as Churchill and he has an excellent supporting cast. In its way, it is a propaganda film, but it is also solid and engrossing in its story-telling and a lot of fun for history buffs especially. I liked it a lot better than the Dunkirk film, but perhaps it is a bit too perfect. Somehow the film doesn’t encourage you to realize that things could have gone very wrong if the British had not been lucky enough to have the right leader at the right time and one to whom the right things happened {like his serendipitous first and only trip on the London “Tubes”). Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
8
LynJan 15, 2018
Wow, this doesn't even make the critics' top 100? That's surprising, considering Gary Oldman's amazing performance. If you appreciated "Dunkirk," definitely see "Darkest Hour" as a behind-the-scenes, "other side of the story." The majority ofWow, this doesn't even make the critics' top 100? That's surprising, considering Gary Oldman's amazing performance. If you appreciated "Dunkirk," definitely see "Darkest Hour" as a behind-the-scenes, "other side of the story." The majority of the movie -- dimly lit and talky, sort of like "Lincoln" -- is probably more "interesting" than "exciting." But the dramatic payoff brought a tear to my eye. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
preciouskikiJan 7, 2018
Stirring, well-paced, gorgeously photographed, and entertaining with occasional bursts of good humor, "Darkest Hour" is a must-see movie for people of all ages. Never dry or boring, it illustrates the entire man, both his flaws and his finerStirring, well-paced, gorgeously photographed, and entertaining with occasional bursts of good humor, "Darkest Hour" is a must-see movie for people of all ages. Never dry or boring, it illustrates the entire man, both his flaws and his finer qualities. We need more movies like this. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
shpostalDec 30, 2017
I had my reservations about seeing this movie, but since Gary Oldman was playing the part of Churchill, I figured it was worth a shot. First, I am not a fan of Churchill. For those of us who know a little WWI history, the manI had my reservations about seeing this movie, but since Gary Oldman was playing the part of Churchill, I figured it was worth a shot. First, I am not a fan of Churchill. For those of us who know a little WWI history, the man was responsible for the inexcusable needless slaughter of 25000 or more British sailors and soldiers in the invasion of the strip of dirt called Gallipoli that jutted out into the Dardanelle straits, leaving them to horrific fates by the Ottomans, who easily defended the strait. Churchill belligerently refused to withdrawal until it was already marked as one of the most pointless and brutal massacres in WWI history. He would never admit wrongdoing for this event, and in my view should never have been a politician ever again. But "Darkest Hour" is historically quite accurate, and I was pleased to see the disaster of Gallipoli was not ignored. Nor was his heavy drinking. However, with Hitler's imminent takeover of France and the east side of the channel, and a state of war already declared, for this brief period Churchill did act appropriately. Neville Chamberlain was pathetic. He had flown to Berlin at Hitler's behest to end up allowing the dictator to take Austria and the Czech Republic free and clear in exchange for a "pact" that he naively thought would bring the U.K. "peace in our time". Even when Hitler violated the agreement by invading Poland and resulted in touching off the European theater of WWII, (Japan well on her way in Manchuria since 1937), Chamberlain and fellow coward Viscount Halifax would sue for a wilting borderline treasonous "deal" with the Germans, even after having been royally suckered. Pacifism is one thing - when the mightiest army of the history of the world up to that time was on the verge of attempting the complete annihilation of your nation, however, to be so cowardly was indeed a war crime in itself. Churchill refused to kowtow to this effort by Chamberlain and Halifax, and it was his steadfastness and determination along with the support of the British population that would ultimately persevere, draining the Luftwaffe dry and forcing Hitler to abandon plans for a full scale invasion. Oldman is terrific, as are the supporting cast. There is almost no real war action but the tension in the month before the Battle of Britain was to commence is palpable. Great care was taken to present as accurately as possible the historic events, and as a person who loves history but is sick to death of the immediate spin and **** that accompanies every aspect of our lifetimes, I appreciated the attempts to exclude any one "favorable" propaganda spin over another. It's a gripping tale, and well worth the time. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
AvrilNov 23, 2017
Joe Wright's Darkest Hour is a masterpiece. Anchored by a career best performance from Gary Oldman, stunning cinematography and one of the mosy beautiful musical scores you will hear this year, Darkest Hour is bold, beautiful and one of theJoe Wright's Darkest Hour is a masterpiece. Anchored by a career best performance from Gary Oldman, stunning cinematography and one of the mosy beautiful musical scores you will hear this year, Darkest Hour is bold, beautiful and one of the best of the year. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
HelenHDec 31, 2017
Wow. This is THE FILM to see. It's simply gripping and despite knowing how it will end it kept me on the edge of my seat the whole time. Masterful acting - it makes you feel with its characters. I definitely recommend.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
Tommy8kinsDec 4, 2017
In the Q&A that followed the BAFTA screening for this superb film Gary Oldman called this a love letter to the British people. That seems appropriate for a wonderful telling of a brand new aspect of what made Churchill the greatest man of theIn the Q&A that followed the BAFTA screening for this superb film Gary Oldman called this a love letter to the British people. That seems appropriate for a wonderful telling of a brand new aspect of what made Churchill the greatest man of the last century and perhaps of all time.

Because this film shows us just how much pressure Halifax and weaker members of the British establishment, put on Churchill to do a deal with Adolf Hitler. A deal that would have preserved the British Empire instead of bankrupting it to the tune of £145 Billion. (Junkers please note). You will learn much about Britain and Churchill and the crisis of May 1940 in this terrific film.

Gary is as absolutely spell binding just as you would expect him to be. What you might not expect is an equally amazing performance by Ben Mendelssohn as King George (Ben was the the bad brother in Blood Lines). Lilly James is also super as the long suffering secretary to to Winston and Kristen Scott Thomas almost steals each scene as Clemmie, Winston's wife.

The film isn't perfect. The scene on the London Underground was silly and irritating and more money should have been spent on the computer graphics. But I still give this a score of 10 because of something unexpected.

The film is emotional. I felt myself choked up on 3 occasions not just because I am a Brit who loves the story but because Joe Wright takes us into the hearts of the characters and makes us feel their fear, their hope and their pain.

Lastly the film is a wonderful reminder that Britain is special and different. It cannot be taken away that we did stand alone, without hope, without support from the USA, when all seemed lost. A salient reminder to remoaners that Europe often needs Britain. This is a cracker of a film. Don't miss it.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
ledaumasDec 22, 2017
Inspiring movie written and acted in an entertaining way that you understand what’s going on. What was so moving was the patriotism of the common cause against Hitler. Churchill saw that giving in to a tyrant meant being vanquished with noInspiring movie written and acted in an entertaining way that you understand what’s going on. What was so moving was the patriotism of the common cause against Hitler. Churchill saw that giving in to a tyrant meant being vanquished with no reason to live. We were in tears watching Churchill forge ahead to overcome what others almost gave up on. That period in time had the same characters in the 1940s that 2017 has now, the greedy trying to overtake the weak. We need another Churchill now... Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
Brent_MarchantDec 16, 2017
While the stellar portrayal of Gary Oldman is a bona fide stand-out, backed by an array of fine supporting performances, the overall product is a little too talky and drawn out to captivate, given that it's based on a story that truly shouldWhile the stellar portrayal of Gary Oldman is a bona fide stand-out, backed by an array of fine supporting performances, the overall product is a little too talky and drawn out to captivate, given that it's based on a story that truly should engross viewers. With a little too much emphasis on the domestic politics behind this British wartime drama, the film becomes bogged down and, frankly, a bit boring. See it for the work of the film's brilliantly depicted protagonist, but don't be surprised if you come away from it a little disappointed overall. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
Compi24Jan 2, 2018
A classic case of supreme acting and directorial talent committing themselves to and performing circles around a script that only occasionally matches their efforts. Now, don't get me wrong - the script's final act is quite good, and theA classic case of supreme acting and directorial talent committing themselves to and performing circles around a script that only occasionally matches their efforts. Now, don't get me wrong - the script's final act is quite good, and the narrative at hand holds a handful of fascinating historical facts. But, generally speaking, the narrative elements only feel about half as epic and historic as they should. This still doesn't stop the movie from being eminently watchable, though. Thanks in no small part to the aforementioned, potentially career-defining performances and directorial work from Gary Oldman and Joe Wright, "Darkest Hour" ultimately shakes out to being a rewarding and enjoyable watch. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
BroyaxNov 17, 2018
Churchill méritait bien un film dédié à sa gloire et son opiniâtreté, ses talents d'orateur et son sens de la formule mais son portrait ici ne se borne pas à un simple panégyrique : ce singulier personnage était un fumeur et un buveurChurchill méritait bien un film dédié à sa gloire et son opiniâtreté, ses talents d'orateur et son sens de la formule mais son portrait ici ne se borne pas à un simple panégyrique : ce singulier personnage était un fumeur et un buveur invétéré mais aussi et surtout un animal politique. Avec le recul, il est incontestable qu'il a été l'homme de la situation dans ces temps troublés et ces... heures sombres.

La grande qualité du film qui se focalise sur le mois de mai 1940 est de montrer la débâcle elle-même vue du côté britannique : l'Europe de l'ouest tombe alors sous le rouleau compresseur de l'agression nazie via sa "blitzkrieg" stupéfiante de rapidité et d'efficacité. On ne voit pourtant que très peu de séquences de guerre : les mauvaises nouvelles qui ne cessent de s'accumuler suffisent à retranscrire cet état d'urgence et d'effondrement imminent... y compris après l'évacuation réussie de Dunkerque.

C'est une chose que le film de Christopher Nolan n'a jamais réussi à rendre dans son "Dunkerque" d'ailleurs. Le Royaume-Uni se retrouve donc isolé face à l'ogre allemand avec à cette époque sans doute un seul homme capable de lui tenir tête, de résister... bien que le Premier Ministre ait quelque difficulté à se faire entendre dans ce gouvernement de coalition dont il a la charge...

L'interprétation de Gary Oldman y est pour beaucoup ; on sait l'acteur très doué et tout ce maquillage n'était à mon avis pas nécessaire mais après tout, cela rajoute encore à ce portrait criant de vérité. On peut regretter du coup qu'on ne suive pas Churchill pendant toute la guerre, de même que son passé ne soit qu'à peine abordé ou évoqué.

La séquence dans le métro est certainement de trop par son caractère surréaliste et ressemble davantage à une vision de la "communication" de notre époque qu'on a maladroitement plaquée, placardée ici via un agenda SJW assez ridicule (mais que fait cet homme noir dans la rame de métro au juste ?). De même pour la dactylo (la très jolie Lily James) dont le rôle sert un autre agenda (féministe celui-là) plus ou moins dissimulé.

Quoi qu'il en soit, le film reste passionnant et très bien fait ; il alterne la grandiloquence, le désarroi et l'émotion avec talent. L'espérance et la fierté aussi, celle d'un peuple inquiet mais combatif. Un peu (beaucoup) comme les si beaux discours de Winston Churchill en somme.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
DubeauJan 14, 2018
This movie will makes people think of Lincoln, but also the Dunkirk movie. The performance of Oldman is by far amazing, inspiring. And his portrait of Churchill is human and touching. The story focus on the political side of the events inThis movie will makes people think of Lincoln, but also the Dunkirk movie. The performance of Oldman is by far amazing, inspiring. And his portrait of Churchill is human and touching. The story focus on the political side of the events in Britain, and in that sens, just enough of the war is said and showed. And it does use some scenes for emotional effect, rather then historical. So no, it's not a true historic film, But it has the quality of showing how hard it was to stand as politician in a period of conflict. It put some perspective to a movie like Dunkirk. I don't know if it was intentional or an opportunistic move, but the timing is good. I give it a 78% because of Oldman and the actors around him. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
BHBarryDec 30, 2017
“Darkest Hour” stars Gary Oldman, was written by Anthony McCarten and was directed by Joe Wright. This as most know is the story of the early days of World War II as Great Britain struggled with the results of the appeasement stratagies of“Darkest Hour” stars Gary Oldman, was written by Anthony McCarten and was directed by Joe Wright. This as most know is the story of the early days of World War II as Great Britain struggled with the results of the appeasement stratagies of Neville Chamberain, his fall from grace and the appointment of Winston Churchill as his successor who led his country and the Allies to a victory over Nazi Germany. But more than anything, it is the vehicle in which Mr. Oldman is given the opportunity of an actor’s lifetime to play Mr. Churchill so convincingly that the film becomes more like a documentary rather than a fictionalized version of what took place in Europe in the days preceding Britain’s entry into the war. I give the film an 8 based mostly on Mr. Oldman’s portrayal of Mr. Churchill but also because of the interesting and informative manner in which the film is presented. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
netflicJan 22, 2018
This is a docu-drama that depicts end of May in 1940 when most of Europe fell to Nazi Germany, and Winston Churchill became GB's PM.

The moment in history was one the the most grave that GB had endured. Yet film's authors invented several
This is a docu-drama that depicts end of May in 1940 when most of Europe fell to Nazi Germany, and Winston Churchill became GB's PM.

The moment in history was one the the most grave that GB had endured. Yet film's authors invented several fictional episodes that never happened to make it look even more dramatic.

I do not want to spoil it for you but the movie should not be taken as "this is how it happened in 1940", only to some degree. Gary Oldman playing Winston Churchill deserves Oscar nomination.

Director Joe Wright made the whole film a bit too stagy and theatrical for my taste.

Overall, the movie is interesting to watch, especially for people who know little about that time in history, particularly in history of WWII.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
HealingToolboxJun 3, 2019
I agree with the The existing positive professional reviews posted here :) The director's commentary track is wonderful if you wish to learn more about directing
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ApolscFeb 27, 2018
This movie is driven by Gary Oldman's astonishing acting, he'll easyly win best actor this year. It's all about dialogues but it's pretty fast paced.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
foreignfilmfanFeb 6, 2018
10 out of 10 for Gary Oldman's performance - brilliant! one of his best, which is saying a lot. But 4 out of 10 for the film itself, which is melodramatic and, in part, historically inaccurate.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DBPirate1129Jan 6, 2018
If you're interested in movies that go extremely in-depth about the behind the scenes of some of the most famous events in human history, Darkest Hour is definitely for you.

The film, as I'm sure everyone knows, focuses on Gary Oldman who
If you're interested in movies that go extremely in-depth about the behind the scenes of some of the most famous events in human history, Darkest Hour is definitely for you.

The film, as I'm sure everyone knows, focuses on Gary Oldman who turns in a spectacular performance as Winston Churchill. At times, I truly believed I was watching the Prime Minister on screen. Stephen Dillane, Ben Mendelsohn, and Lily James are also highlights. Darkest Hour does a great job of balancing a realistic portrayal of Churchill and the sort of legendary status that he has nowadays. Despite the fact that the film also displayed some of the man's faults, it also succeeded in making him a sympathetic underdog character. I think that most people that see it will have a great respect for his struggles and him after coming out of the theater. The movie is very well paced, but begins ramping up in the final act. A scene near the end of the film that takes place in the Underground is definitely the highlight.

I walked away from Darkest Hour pleasantly surprised. This is definitely one of the best biographical and historical films to date.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HotelCentralSep 27, 2018
If you as an audience member are in love with things that go boom then this is not the film for you, because "Darkest Hour" is a film created by people who know something about drama, and dialog, and character, and how to hold people'sIf you as an audience member are in love with things that go boom then this is not the film for you, because "Darkest Hour" is a film created by people who know something about drama, and dialog, and character, and how to hold people's attention without any need for chattering machine-guns and roaring explosions and 120 minutes of unending carnage.

This is one of the best films I've seen in years and it won something like 5 separate awards for best film, including the Oscar and the British Academy award. Gary Oldman is excellent and won something in excess of 15 awards for best actor, including the Oscar and the British Academy award. The story is engrossing. Makeup, costumes, and cinematography all won awards as well. And at least one historian is on record as saying that Oldman nailed it: the man, the gestures, the speech patterns, etc.

If you haven't seen it by now, get the DVD, get it from your local library, borrow it from your cousin, but see it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
CineAutoctonoJan 23, 2018
"Darkest Hour" was a great movie, the story is somewhat entertaining, but Gary Oldman was the one who took all the credit, and almost all the prizes missing the Oscar, he played a great British character such as Winston Churchill, his battle"Darkest Hour" was a great movie, the story is somewhat entertaining, but Gary Oldman was the one who took all the credit, and almost all the prizes missing the Oscar, he played a great British character such as Winston Churchill, his battle and his ambitions were key to a great story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SrPepeFeb 15, 2018
Una película muy divertida con una historia que debe ser conocida por todo el mundo. La actuación de Oldman es genial, digna del Oscar.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
pdw123Dec 31, 2017
Truly, the most incredible portrayal of Churchill ever viewed. Can't believe the critic on Vox saying the film didn't have enough historical context or "wasn't much of a film". This gem is right up there with great films like "SophieTruly, the most incredible portrayal of Churchill ever viewed. Can't believe the critic on Vox saying the film didn't have enough historical context or "wasn't much of a film". This gem is right up there with great films like "Sophie Scholl" in displaying that fine historical line and that we could've all ended up under odious fascism. And, that Churchill was a deep thinker weighing many factors and humble man, unlike other accounts falsely describing him as arrogant. Oldman and whole cast are incredible here, PBS worthy. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
miccaelMar 3, 2018
strong movie. People need to know who Churchill was.
He was no saint but had guts to go against Hitler.
Gary Oldman plays well and as much as I did research, movie is close to what historians have on their records.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alejandro970Jan 28, 2018
Gary Oldman is one of the actors who that best interpreted the historic profile of Winston Churchill, is his early days as Prime Minister, and his hardest dilemma. The sequence of London Underground is for antology.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Creeper3455Jan 21, 2018
Once upon a time,Joe Wright understood that the abomination known as "Pan (2015)" failed big time and decided to make a comeback with "Darkest Hour",a movie whose material and execution I would describe with an adjective 'Solid'.
After seeing
Once upon a time,Joe Wright understood that the abomination known as "Pan (2015)" failed big time and decided to make a comeback with "Darkest Hour",a movie whose material and execution I would describe with an adjective 'Solid'.
After seeing countless versions of Winston Churchill,Gary Oldman is probably the Churchill worthy of an Oscar,and to the makeup team 'credit where credit is due',because they somehow managed to transform Oldman's sweet-looking face into someone else.
The story was also easy to follow (kinda like the instructions of a LEGO Set),where its execution was going for a slow build-up to a delirious 3rd Act,with surprising moments of comedy that try to make the movie a little 'lighthearted' and parts that make it the 2nd movie of 2017 with some mentions of Dunkirk (that was indeed refreshing).
The soundtrack by Dario Marianelli was both catchy and the movie's only flaw (near the end) and it sure made a scene after the beginning the best part of the movie.
Summing everything up,Darkest Hour was a surprise (especially since this is my first Oscar Contender movie of 2017). Talking about Awards,I would compare this to Titanic,since both of these movies I would call 'Oscar Movies that don't really need that much recognition',since they'll be talked about for years to come. Joe Wright made a step-up over his last (horrible) effort and made an inspiring movie,with,as said,a Winston Churchill worthy of an Award.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
VirgonoShakaMar 24, 2018
While this movie is not specially different from many, many other WW2 flicks, and it does glorify some of the characters and themes too much, Gary Oldman's performance and some excellent cinematography here and there, specially in awkwardWhile this movie is not specially different from many, many other WW2 flicks, and it does glorify some of the characters and themes too much, Gary Oldman's performance and some excellent cinematography here and there, specially in awkward scenes makes this movie a worthy use of your time, specially if you like historical films. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AkumaJackApr 13, 2018
Great acting and directing, but the film is painfully slow since it is a biopic about Churchill. It is not for everyone because of that, but if you like inspiring dialougues then go for it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JLuis_001Jan 17, 2018
Joe Wright is a good director but the script he worked with seems not to match his work or that of the titanic Gary Oldman who should undoubtedly win the Oscar this year.

There are many moments in which the narrative fails and the flow of
Joe Wright is a good director but the script he worked with seems not to match his work or that of the titanic Gary Oldman who should undoubtedly win the Oscar this year.

There are many moments in which the narrative fails and the flow of the story is not really seductive, however the film manages to maintain itself in a stable point but that it's because of the skill of the director and the work of its main character rather than the film itself.

I heard people compare it with Lincoln, undoubtedly they share similarities but Lincoln was much more functional and succesful with its subject.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
tripp2themoviesJan 2, 2018
"Darkest Hour" would not be as good as it is without Gary Oldman's terrific performance as Winston Churchill. While the rest of the movie isn't bad by any means, Gary Oldman keeps us interested when the film fails to produce an interesting"Darkest Hour" would not be as good as it is without Gary Oldman's terrific performance as Winston Churchill. While the rest of the movie isn't bad by any means, Gary Oldman keeps us interested when the film fails to produce an interesting narrative. Lily James is also in the film, but doesn't have anything interesting to do. The acting from her is never bad, but I would have liked to see what she could do with an interesting character. Another thing worth mentioning is the amazing cinematography in this film. The director of photography is Bruno Delbonnel, who previously produced the cinematography in films like "Inside Llewyn Davis," so this guy is the real deal. The overall direction from Joe Wright is pretty good as well. "Darkest Hour" was a great film, even though the script wasn't always interesting. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
WalterTSolleyJan 6, 2018
“Darkest Hour” is far from perfect, and that is primarily the fault of director Joe Wright, who has momentary lapses of taste that, were it not for a fine screenplay and incomparable performances, would have ruined this film. What we have“Darkest Hour” is far from perfect, and that is primarily the fault of director Joe Wright, who has momentary lapses of taste that, were it not for a fine screenplay and incomparable performances, would have ruined this film. What we have instead—thanks to a brilliant lead performance, by a perfectly unrecognizable Gary Oldman as Winston Churchill, equally fine supporting performances, and an engrossing screenplay written with Churchill’s own words—is history come to life. If not in unimpeachable detail, certainly and unequivocally in spirit. The remarkable core of this movie is performance and words, and ultimately that is all the audience will care about. Inspiring and moving as filmed historical record, without artistic vision as cinema. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
KunderaDec 28, 2017
Hardcore history. Britain saved by this man. And it is great to see this giant of history being viewed in his own time. His own party hated him. The opposition hated him. They thought he was delusional and only cared about himself. SoundHardcore history. Britain saved by this man. And it is great to see this giant of history being viewed in his own time. His own party hated him. The opposition hated him. They thought he was delusional and only cared about himself. Sound familiar? History proved him right. My only quibble with this film is they didn't show the background of Neville Chamberlain's appeasement to the Germans. But the odds were stacked against Churchill and he overcame after a very weak predecessor. Sound familiar? See it! Learn! Understand! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
halllllooFeb 7, 2018
Darkest Hour dreht sich um Winston Churchill und sein Wirken beim Eintritt Großbritanniens in den 2. Weltkrieg. Churchill wird brilliant von Gary Oldman verkörpert. Der Film startet und endet sehr stark, hat jedoch im Mittelteil ein paarDarkest Hour dreht sich um Winston Churchill und sein Wirken beim Eintritt Großbritanniens in den 2. Weltkrieg. Churchill wird brilliant von Gary Oldman verkörpert. Der Film startet und endet sehr stark, hat jedoch im Mittelteil ein paar Probleme das recht hohe Pacing beizubehalten. Der Film sieht super aus und schafft es an manchen Stellen sogar gekonnt einen Witz einzubauen. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Roro21Jan 14, 2018
If Gary Oldman and Kristin Scott Thomas weren't in this film, it would be a third-rate, historically inaccurate soap-opera. Thankfully, they are in it. Oldman puts in an award-winning performance, and it's a shame Kristin wasn't in it moreIf Gary Oldman and Kristin Scott Thomas weren't in this film, it would be a third-rate, historically inaccurate soap-opera. Thankfully, they are in it. Oldman puts in an award-winning performance, and it's a shame Kristin wasn't in it more (I get the feeling she was supposed to be in more scenes, which were cut).

The supporting cast, directing, miss-en-scene, writing and narrative were all lacklustre when compared with Netflix's 'The Crown', which nails the fine line between fiction and historical accuracy. "Darkest Hour" also looks to have been made on a budget. The success of this film hangs on Oldman's performance, which is mesmerising. Plus, what's with all these Dunkirk themed movies? Could we British be looking to our past for encouragement to get through Brexit?
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
amheretojudgeJan 29, 2018
will you stop interrupting me while i am interrupting you..

Darkest Hour I think that this is probably the first movie to have these number of monologues (after any Woody Allen's movie, I presume) and they are so good and within all these
will you stop interrupting me while i am interrupting you..

Darkest Hour

I think that this is probably the first movie to have these number of monologues (after any Woody Allen's movie, I presume) and they are so good and within all these speeches or explanations or discussions, there is a beautiful relation brewing whose innocence and sweetness might probably the highlight of the movie along with of course Gary Oldman's performance. Darkest Hour is as it name suggests; dark on its premise and character driven film which is entirely based on facts which may come off as a bit disappointing since it is low on drama. As mentioned earlier, this is clearly Gary's show and what a show he puts on; from his walk to attitude or behaviour to nature or even how he manages to move as he talks or even argue, Gary lights up Winston Churchill brightly and majestically. Joe's depiction is perfect on screen and there is no doubt but it still needed a better editing considering it is more that 2 hours long. Darkest Hour is raw, brutal and dark on its tone and its completely palpable too and if it had better editing, gripping screenplay and high on drama or entertainment; Joe would have crossed it out of the park.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
thetylerhouckJan 19, 2018
As a film, the movie may lack some gravitas, and feels very stilted as a by-the-books biopic. As a character study of Winston Churchill, Gary Oldman proves he is a master chameleon, blending into a role that should finally adorn him with thatAs a film, the movie may lack some gravitas, and feels very stilted as a by-the-books biopic. As a character study of Winston Churchill, Gary Oldman proves he is a master chameleon, blending into a role that should finally adorn him with that long-deserved Oscar. The film finds humanity in it's light-hearted moments, creating a character study that many will point to as a template for future biopics. Some of the camera shots felt like a forced artistic choice that didn't meld with the film, but whenever Oldman is on screen, you can't ignore him. Regardless of the flaws, this performance is defining, and cements Oldman's status as one of the finest in film to date. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
surajchelatSRCJan 25, 2018
The Second World War is at its height; the system has fallen and Britain is at its Darkest Hour. Chamberlain has stepped down from the Big Chair, Halifax refuses to take over the reins, and the focus obviously shifts to a man who they believeThe Second World War is at its height; the system has fallen and Britain is at its Darkest Hour. Chamberlain has stepped down from the Big Chair, Halifax refuses to take over the reins, and the focus obviously shifts to a man who they believe can win most hearts; a flawed man who's known widely for his strange habits and fitting eloquence, a man who lives upto the reputation he upkeeps-none but one of the greatest Leader-Orators the world has ever had a taste of-Winston Churchill. It's such a well known story, with multiple underlying aspects to it. Joe Wright, the man who made 'Atonement', chose to make a movie on this one in particular, because he knew how far elucidative and reverberatory a story he could tell on this one. He has managed to rip of multiple perspectives on the same, besides the Great Man demanding a constant centre stage; the movie focuses on the view points of Clementine Churchill, King George VI, Halifax, Chamberlain, Eliza Nel Churchill's personal secretary, and more importantly that of free citizens, as much as it focuses on The British Bulldog. The word 'Dark' is given paramount importance in the whole method of storytelling; most of the drama happens in dark rooms and unlit alleys, and within the brooding darkness of a perplexed mind, Churchill has always housed. Some of his iconic speeches have been featured in the movie, and the arresting flow of visuals blended with a storming performance by Gary Oldman is sure to oust you out from your seats on intense outbursts. Gave me goosebumps, literally.

Portraying Churchill, Gary Oldman's is an expression par excellence. Besides impersonating Churchill to the maximum possible extent, in appearance, gait as well as strange poses, he has manifested the essential character of the Man under study, to astounding results. He looks like a Churchill in the eyes, in deeds and posture; even in silhouettes!!! As far as an actor is concerned, he must make the rest feel nothing about his acting at all; at least until the movie ends. I never saw a trace of Oldman in this movie; all I saw was Churchill, who I even took to believe could've replaced the real one. Such a profound feat! Brilliance is the word. Churchill was not only a man famous for his leadership, looks and behaviour, but also for his strong words. The modulation that Oldman has brought about, combined with the strict control he has kept, gives us one of this year's countable performances which will make the Big Race soon. As of now, I'll say it's Oldman; have to watch Phantom Thread more to judge on that one completely! At one instance Churchill says at the peak of his screen tension, "You cannot reason with a Tiger when your head is in its mouth." Oldman will make us wonder which side Churchill meant himself to be in; he has both the tiger as well as a fearing doe in his face there!!!

The movie is all about inner conflicts, the mind's darkness; it also brings in unheard details about the Great Man. It shows even the great Winston Churchill had stuttered on many occasions, before presenting some of his iconic pieces. The movie was made the same year we had another Dunkirk movie by Nolan; 'Darkest Hour' presents a whole lot of unseen perspective on Operation Dynamo and Churchill's hardbound decisions. There's even a subtle nod to the hasty 'naming ceremony' of the whole operation. There's another great scene where he makes a call to the Whitehouse, asking for help and reinforcements to defend his country; 'Franklin Roosevelt' on the other end is shown as a helpless voice, while the effective drama is taking place in Churchill's face and his head, not to leave out the darkness enveloping his private recess. The movie starts of where the darkness has just crept inside the Men's souls, wounded with fear and ends off on a resolutive high. It shows the ordeals that the Great Leader had to surpass to reach there, the new channels he had to break open towards it. Instead of focusing on the general victory, it dwells and swings inside a perplexed heart; which had to think a great deal in pain, before making an anyway detrimental decision at this hour, with the least harm assured. The age too wasn't favourable for him; Thanks to Oldman's acting expertise, all these details subtly flow. It also has its funny moments; gives some trivial confirmation on the iconic man's strangest ways. His wits were impeccable, as was his uncontrollable rage!

Joe Wright has done it all in a conventional way, delivering an outright classic. The Drama is so intense, and rich with emotions; and it's as riveting as the peachiest entertainment flick there is, running in town. A very well written screenplay by Anthony McCarten, and a dashing score by Dario Marianelli has rightly contributed to its ebbs and flows. A really well made movie on one of the most adored figures from History, a ripe man who was always young at Heart and eloquent in speech, 'Darkest Hour' is easily a must watch.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Mo76akFeb 16, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A very impressive simulation of the internal stituation of a counrty in war with Gary Oldmans admirable acting.I believe the scene in subway was so lovely.And so the last scene in Parliament with Oldmans decisive speech and how he leaves the room with authority.Also I like the Cinematography , production design and music.But I think the movie just focus on Churchill and Englands positive aspects in the war,and maybe deceives the audiences without historical knowledge. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AndrewBurgeApr 7, 2018
Joe Wright's 'Darkest Hour' might be the most obvious Oscar bait film of the year, especially when it comes down to Gary Oldman's impeccable and brave performance of the controversial Winston Churchill, but you know what? It worked! This isJoe Wright's 'Darkest Hour' might be the most obvious Oscar bait film of the year, especially when it comes down to Gary Oldman's impeccable and brave performance of the controversial Winston Churchill, but you know what? It worked! This is one of the best films of the year!

'Darkest Hour' sets itself apart from other generic biopics by seeping the mannish personality of its lead character through nearly every single element, especially the soundtrack and the refined and polished cinematography, and mostly through its pace. It is rarely that a film inspired by real life events managed to thrill, as real life is often not very exciting, even from a political stand-off. But the grim situation in which the Allied Forces found themselves during the beginning of the Second World War its definitely made for the screen. The director, Joe Wright, and the screenwriter, Anthony McCarten were well aware of this, as they kept the historical accuracy without sacrificing excitement.

It is definitely a film which manages to thrill more than one which would take place in the actual battlefield. But the tensions between Churchill and his associates in the government is really tense and generates a consistent rhythm of adrenaline pumping. This rhythm is also conveyed by Churchill's nearly unbreakable will, which, thanks in part to Oldman's well deserved Oscar-winning performance, seeps an uplifting, glorious and patriotic tone, amidst the Allies being nearly wiped out!

In an age where world leaders are less and less trusted, 'Darkest Hour' is a proud example of historical leadership and eventual glory achieved by listening to the people (addendum to the scene in which the prime-minister rides the underground metro as a simple man). For him, riding the metro was an experience, as he confessed "I've never been on public transport[...] I know how to boil an egg but only because I've seen it done."

There have been many portrayals of the bulldog himself in cinema, but never was one so personal and so truthful but respectful at the same time.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
HopDoubleScotchApr 6, 2018
It wasn't perfect, god not nearly so. But that's no excuse at all to ignore the phenomenal, earth shattering performance given by Gary Oldman and Kristin Thomas as Mr. And Mrs. Churchill. The dark story of the first few months of ChurchillsIt wasn't perfect, god not nearly so. But that's no excuse at all to ignore the phenomenal, earth shattering performance given by Gary Oldman and Kristin Thomas as Mr. And Mrs. Churchill. The dark story of the first few months of Churchills term as Prime Minister shows us a theatrical (But enjoyable) window into the struggles that were faced during the events of Operation Dynamo, and offers us a chance to see another take through the eyes of Joe Wright. Is it perfect? No
Is it Dramatic? God yes.

Should you see it? Without a doubt.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SakataOct 6, 2018
The film "Darkest Hour" by itself is not one of the most memorable works in film history, despite having many qualities. What will make him relevant in the future is precisely the powerful performance of Gary Oldman, unrecognizable andThe film "Darkest Hour" by itself is not one of the most memorable works in film history, despite having many qualities. What will make him relevant in the future is precisely the powerful performance of Gary Oldman, unrecognizable and uncontested as Winston Churchill. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DawdlingPoetNov 22, 2021
I liked the (sometimes lavish) settings/surroundings this film is set in. Its quite engrossing, with a very commanding central performance from Gary Oldman as Churchill. As the story develops, Oldman's performance gets better and better. OfI liked the (sometimes lavish) settings/surroundings this film is set in. Its quite engrossing, with a very commanding central performance from Gary Oldman as Churchill. As the story develops, Oldman's performance gets better and better. Of course the fact that this is based on a true story made me find it all the more engrossing.

The film is quite tense at times and I thought it made for a very decent period drama. The music used isn't over the top and thus overbearing and the script didn't strike me as cheesy or bland, so I'd recommend it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
geewahDec 27, 2020
A brilliant performance from Oldman as Churchill, a flawed leader in a time of crisis. Rather than all encompassing biopic, it focusses on a critical period of his life and is all the better for it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
liamexeNov 8, 2022
a wonderful depiction of the greatest Briton ever during what was undoubtedly the darkest period for the nation. But why, oh WHY, do contemporary filmmakers feel the need to incorporate moments in 'factual' pictures that are blatantly madea wonderful depiction of the greatest Briton ever during what was undoubtedly the darkest period for the nation. But why, oh WHY, do contemporary filmmakers feel the need to incorporate moments in 'factual' pictures that are blatantly made up? The incident on the tube train most definitely fit into this category, and the political correctness that was unavoidable made it worse. In those days, there were few opportunities to see a black person on television, and even fewer opportunities to see someone with a classical education. One day, I hope to watch a movie that respects its viewers' intelligence. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
julienelJan 7, 2023
I rate this movie 8 stars out of 10. Acting is undoubtedly amazing as well as the shot actions. Despite the fact that this movie is not strictly historical or biographical, it is a war drama. I expected more references to the historicalI rate this movie 8 stars out of 10. Acting is undoubtedly amazing as well as the shot actions. Despite the fact that this movie is not strictly historical or biographical, it is a war drama. I expected more references to the historical concepts and terms. Gary Oldman as always did a great job. Visually pleasant and recommended for people who start their adventure with war drama or historical/biographical movies. Dates help a lot! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews