Dangerous Liaisons

Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: December 16, 1988

7.5	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 78 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

RachelS.May 12, 2006

Simply the truest reflection of the battle of the sexes that there has ever been.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

lasttimeisawNov 25, 2012

First of all, no offence, but calling John Malkovich

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

BitashSep 15, 2019

Absolutely amazing, I did not even know about the movie till today.....breath taking costumes , hair and jewelry, set design is spectacular, great great acting, director paying attention to every detail, fantastic writing andAbsolutely amazing, I did not even know about the movie till today.....breath taking costumes , hair and jewelry, set design is spectacular, great great acting, director paying attention to every detail, fantastic writing and dialog......complicated layered characters....everyone’s acting is superb, I forgot I was watching a movie, you get immersed in the storyline which is well told, never once could I see the script in my head, No weak link in this movie. It’s a must see. No one will be able to remake this movie, you cannot make it any better than this. They should re release this movie in theatres so the ne wgeneration can see.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

JLuis_001Dec 1, 2019

I don't really consider myself a fan of period films. I rarely enjoy them but this one has a much darker and provocative plot than one would expect and that was quite striking and curious.

What I always rescue from films of this type are theI don't really consider myself a fan of period films. I rarely enjoy them but this one has a much darker and provocative plot than one would expect and that was quite striking and curious.

What I always rescue from films of this type are the performances and usually these don't disappoint and this film is no exception. The three main actors were still at a great moment and that adds another good point to this story.

Stephen Frears is not a great filmmaker but this is one of the best films I've seen from him.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

FilipeNetoFeb 2, 2020

A visually beautiful film, where evil and perversity show their most attractive and seductive side.

The Baroque period was a time that became history for its wars (Seven Years' War, Spanish Succession War), for the emergence of art and operaA visually beautiful film, where evil and perversity show their most attractive and seductive side.

The Baroque period was a time that became history for its wars (Seven Years' War, Spanish Succession War), for the emergence of art and opera (Handel, Vivaldi, Carlos Seixas, Bach etc. in music, Velasquez, Caravaggio , van Dyck, Josefa de Óbidos, Rembrandt etc. in art), for the elaborate clothes and wigs worn by the rich and for the aristocracy, for royal absolutism and for their gigantic palaces (like Versailles, Sanssouci, Charlottenburg, Peterhoff, Tsarskoye Selo, Mafra, El Escorial etc.) But the Baroque was also a period of some moral relaxation, particularly for the upper classes. Figures such as Giacomo Casanova or the infamous Marquis de Sade are precisely from this period. And it is around two particularly infamous figures that the film takes place.

The marquise Isabelle de Merteuil is a manipulative, cold and cruel widow, who has a long-standing affair with the promiscuous and rude Viscount Valmont. It is she who asks Valmont to seduce the pure young Cécile de Volanges, who was destined to marry a man whom Merteuil hated. The viscount hesitates, preferring to try to seduce Madame de Tourvel, married and highly moralistic, due to the challenge this represents. But together they will jeopardize their and others' honor and feelings.

In this film, the story combines seduction, cruelty and passion quite well. The main characters, played brilliantly by Glenn Close and John Malkovich (one of the most notable films in the career of both actors), are truly despicable but have style and class, and that is what makes them alluring. Evil can be attractive, as we all know. Beside them, we have a great Michelle Pfeiffer, living the golden years of her career, and a young Uma Thurman, emerging, showing a developing talent as she played a Baroque Lolita. Keanu Reeves also appears, in a somewhat discreet role but that the actor effectively fulfills without having the space to show more.

Directed by Stephen Frears, the film has excellent costumes and sets. The use of excellent filming locations such as the Château de Neuville, Vincennes and the Montansier Theater in France helped a lot to the beauty and realism of the final product. The film also features a photograph with good contrast and regular filming.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

radegeddonAug 19, 2018

"Dangerous Liaisons" is a brilliant melodrama whose assets are difficult to count. Let's just say this film wins you over layered characters, the luxurious and convincing reconstruction of the era in which the action takes place, rich"Dangerous Liaisons" is a brilliant melodrama whose assets are difficult to count. Let's just say this film wins you over layered characters, the luxurious and convincing reconstruction of the era in which the action takes place, rich emotions, the great camera, and meticulous directing. Still, the striking trumps are phenomenal actors. Difficult to say who is better, John Malkovich, Glenn Close, Michelle Pfeiffer or then very young Uma Thurman. Nowadays famous Keanu Reeves (Matrix), had a small but nice act. In addition to great criticism, Frears' "Dangerous Connections" can boast of great success at cinemas and a great number of awards.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

DawdlingPoetNov 21, 2021

I thought Glenn Close and John Malkovich both gave very good performances in this film - they have decent on screen chemistry and I can't deny Malkovich does the 'death stare' particularly effectively. Also present is a young Peter CapaldiI thought Glenn Close and John Malkovich both gave very good performances in this film - they have decent on screen chemistry and I can't deny Malkovich does the 'death stare' particularly effectively. Also present is a young Peter Capaldi and an even younger Keanu Reeves, who swordfights in one scene. The period costumes and settings are good and the dialogue is quite good (somewhat thought provoking) at times. I suppose its about a power play, asserting authority over others. Yes I'd recommend this film, for the performances alone. If I were to describe it (plot wise) in a few words, it'd be 'subtle scheming plans play out'.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

sc0TTiOct 14, 2019

Solid adaptation. The male actors are the weakest points (John Malkovich and Keanu) , and it misses a couple of the important character aspects from the book here and there, but I was mostly satisfied.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

avr50Mar 20, 2017

This movie has the most complicated characters ever.
Glenn Close should have won an Oscar for her masterfull performance as Marquise de Mertefull. The writing is really wonderfull, with the words of Christopher Hampton and the productionThis movie has the most complicated characters ever.
Glenn Close should have won an Oscar for her masterfull performance as Marquise de Mertefull. The writing is really wonderfull, with the words of Christopher Hampton and the production design, the costume, the music and the performances this is one of the best movies of all time… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

BroyaxJun 10, 2022

Je ne crois pas que ce livre (qui remonte au XVIIIème siècle) soit vraiment adaptable, ni au théâtre, ni au grand écran… ni ailleurs, d’ailleurs ! ce film compassé est quoi qu’il en soit tiré d’une pièce, elle-même adaptée pour le cinéma parJe ne crois pas que ce livre (qui remonte au XVIIIème siècle) soit vraiment adaptable, ni au théâtre, ni au grand écran… ni ailleurs, d’ailleurs ! ce film compassé est quoi qu’il en soit tiré d’une pièce, elle-même adaptée pour le cinéma par Stephen Frears, lequel n’a -au moins- pas lésiné sur la qualité de la distribution.

Ils étaient tous si jeunes à cette époque que visionner ou tenter de revisionner ce machin nous fait demander en quel temps il fut tourné… eh bien, en 1988 pour être précis ! diantre, autant dire une éternité… Elles étaient belles en tout cas et il était beau le Malkovich ! en plus, avec la perruque d’usage, on ne remarquait pas sa calvitie…

On remarque ces sacrés corsages par contre, avec une préférence pour Uma thurman qui campe une oie blanche à la gorge généreuse (est-ce qu’elle arrive encore à respirer ? ça semble difficile…). Mais ces complots d’opérette chez les peigne-culs se révèlent assommants… impossible de tenir sans dormir.

A tout prendre, je préfère de loin le sketch d’anthologie des Inconnus (évidemment infiniment plus court que cette litanie pédante de deux plombes) et très drôle : « les liaisons vachement dangereuses » que ça s’appelait ! et ça, c’était quelque chose… Comme quoi merde, avec des efforts et des idées, on peut… tout adapter… finalement !… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews