Complete Unknown

IFC Films | Release Date: August 26, 2016

6.2	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 13 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

NightReviewsFeb 9, 2017

Living in a world such as today’s, its no wonder how some people might want to just decide to up and leave their lives; their loved ones and the world’s that they know all so well. With the expansion of social media, the rapid decline ofLiving in a world such as today’s, its no wonder how some people might want to just decide to up and leave their lives; their loved ones and the world’s that they know all so well. With the expansion of social media, the rapid decline of privacy and our world’s natural ability to connect people almost effortlessly, picking up and taking off may seem like a suitable alternative. Yet, the newest film from Maria Full of Grace director Joshua Marston offers many promises about the idea of false identities, femme fatales and of course, the illusion and perception of strangers. Complete Unknown is a very dry, empty and almost didactic film about the essence of strangers, friends, family and oneself and the true meaning of self and the people we think we know and surround ourselves with everyday. Even if we tried, giving away too much of the film is almost impossible, especially if you’ve already seen the trailer to this highly deceptive and promising feature. Unfortunately, the big reveal and climax of the film comes way too early in the film (which is also spoiled in the trailer) and the majority of the film is basically a reunion between two lost lovers who spend a birthday evening catching up. The birthday boy, Tom (Michael Shannon) is surprised when his good friend and business partner brings an unexpected guest date to his quaint birthday gathering in his lovely New York brownstone. When Tom’s business partner Clyde (Michael Churns), brings Alice (Rachel Weisz) as his date to Tom’s birthday party, Clyde is under the impression that Alice is just a coincidental beauty who enjoys the food of their local business cafeteria and who he has made an uncanny connection with. Unknown to him at the time, Alice, whose name is really Jennifer, is a long-lost flame of Tom’s. Jennifer, who, fifteen years ago, walked away on her loved ones and family, and pursued a life as a drifter and civilian of the world, decides, after he life abroad, that her story with Tom isn’t quite finished. Assisting in hospitals as a nurse, becoming a test subject and entertaining for magicians, and studying a very rare type of frog in a nearby New York laboratory, Alice’s passions, hobbies and professions add the to complete enigma that is Alice.
cu5

Early on, it is revealed to the audience as well as the guests of Tom’s birthday party that Alice is a compulsive liar who is addicted to the idea of mis-identity and role playing. Her obsession of “living a thousand lives” becomes a very disturbing account of the many passions, desires and thoughts of countless people, who never really are able to live such fantasies out. Yet, as the film progresses and the dialogue builds, Alice’s motives and decision for walking out on Tom becomes as clear a foggy day in London. Even when the reveal of Alice’s true identity of Jenny is made clear, director and writer Marston spends very little effort explaining her pathologically disturbing behaviour to Tom, or the audience. In essence, Jenny’s rationale is a complete unknown, even given her very short family background.

Marston, who covered a very pressing social issue in Maria Full of Grace takes on a complete original work with fellow screenwriter Jualian Sheppard, that is anything but original, and takes too many cues from Mike Nichols’ Closer; Natalie Portman’s alias’ name in the film; the theme of mis-identity and of course, a very powerful and iconic final scene in which our main protagonists are walking amongst many people on a street, being the only individual visible in a crowd of blurred faces.

Complete Unknown is a film that really asks many questions, yet only deals with the questions Tom has for Jenny, and the many answers she keeps flipping around as the film progresses. One of the most interesting aspects of the film is quite actually, the casting. Shannon, who is a veteran actor, has a very powerful range of mournful facial expressions that speak volumes. While Weisz, who is nothing short of alluring, has a natural beauty that is quite forgiving, disarming yet also very engaging once opened up. Weisz and Shannon’s chemistry is one of the few things that are hard to ignore in the film, yet, these two amazingly versatile and talented actors really can’t save a film that could have played better as a short film.

As Jenny’s character reveals to Tom in the fourth act of the film, life allows you to be anyone you really want to be. All it takes is a complete unemotional detachment from the people you love most and some distance from the people who “think” that know you, and you can put yourself anywhere in the world and be anyone you want to be. Yet, with each and every very anti-climatic reveal, we become in engaged in the very distorted reality of Jenny’s world, an almost intoxicating look at the ability to shape, mould and form yourself into anyone at all, yet no one really.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

Compi24Aug 30, 2016

Aside from the two engaging lead performances from Rachel Weisz and Michael Shannon, Joshua Marston's "Complete Unknown" is an ultimately unsatisfying watch. Barely treading water with its glacial pacing and occasionally painful dialogue, theAside from the two engaging lead performances from Rachel Weisz and Michael Shannon, Joshua Marston's "Complete Unknown" is an ultimately unsatisfying watch. Barely treading water with its glacial pacing and occasionally painful dialogue, the film aims for thematic fences and lands somewhere in between there and home plate, briefly scratching the surfaces at hand, but never really delving anywhere deeper than that. Unless you're a fan of challenging mood pieces or any of the director's previous works, I'd say proceed with cautious optimism.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews