Wrath of the Titans
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: March 30, 2012
5.2
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 350 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
103
Mixed:
164
Negative:
83
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
2
vikesh2206Nov 9, 2014
Like its predecessor, this unnecessary, box office hauling sequel hurls at us tiring action sequences, bland characters, a lame storyline and a false portrayal of Greek Gods. Its only "pro" is that it is slightly better than its dreadful predecessor.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
CineAutoctonoDec 24, 2015
"Wrath of the Titans" was similar to the first but with more emotion , good CGI , the plot just absurd , boring in the script without another opinion.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
mohamad91hkJun 25, 2019
Although I didn't like ''Clash of the Titans'' a lot, but It was little enjoyable, and for its sequel "Wrath of the Titans'', it's worse, the movie was boring, less action, fewer creatures and silly character turning.

Don't waste your time,Although I didn't like ''Clash of the Titans'' a lot, but It was little enjoyable, and for its sequel "Wrath of the Titans'', it's worse, the movie was boring, less action, fewer creatures and silly character turning.

Don't waste your time, you can watch the 1st part ''Clash of the Titans'' only if you like these types of movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
TheTigerDragonzMar 29, 2016
I think this movie should been giving a meta score of 40 on imdb. The movie was fun to watch in the cinema. It was full of intense action. The effects of this movie was great. Some scenes of the movie was kind of boring but i still enjoyedI think this movie should been giving a meta score of 40 on imdb. The movie was fun to watch in the cinema. It was full of intense action. The effects of this movie was great. Some scenes of the movie was kind of boring but i still enjoyed the filming.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
MovieMasterEddyApr 3, 2016
“FEEL THE WRATH,” promises the movie poster for “Wrath of the Titans,” the sequel to 2010’s mythologically themed “Clash of the Titans.”

The only reason you’ll feel any wrath is because you shelled out 12 bucks for this steaming bucket of“FEEL THE WRATH,” promises the movie poster for “Wrath of the Titans,” the sequel to 2010’s mythologically themed “Clash of the Titans.”

The only reason you’ll feel any wrath is because you shelled out 12 bucks for this steaming bucket of half-baked plot, cliched dialogue and disappointing 3-D special effects. It may be even worse than the original (whose Rotten Tomatoes score, by the way, is a whopping 28 out of 100). Who exactly was clamoring for a follow-up?

As before, Sam Worthington plays Greek hero Perseus, the demigod son of Zeus (Liam Neeson, in Dumbledore drag). Zeus is imprisoned by his brother Hades (Ralph Fiennes) in an effort to overthrow the Olympian gods and resurrect Kronos, the dormant leader of the evil Titans. To save Zeus, Perseus goes on a quest to the underworld. At stake is not just his father’s life — yeah, I thought gods were immortal, too — but the future of the world. As a CGI villain, Kronos looks like he’s made of molten lava and sounds like Barry White speaking Klingon.

Scary it is not. Perplexing, maybe.

For example, how is it that Greek queen Andromeda (Rosamund Pike) has never heard of Hephaestus, who pops up early in the movie and then is quickly dispensed with? Modern audiences may not recognize the god of fire, but you would think that the supreme ruler of the Greeks would have a clue. Pike plays Andromeda — Perseus’ s comrade-in-arms and PG-13 love interest — like she’s auditioning for a remake of “Xena: Warrior Princess.” A ZZ Top-bearded Bill Nighy — who looks like he’s in disguise more than in costume — is absolutely wasted as Hephaestus.

In an effort to appeal to audiences who might resist anything that smacks of the classics, the dialogue includes anachronisms such as “You gotta be kiddin’ me.” Perseus’s son Helius (John Bell) refers to his father throughout the film as “Dad.”And I’m pretty sure I heard someone in a crowd scene say, “Wow.”

It sure as heck didn’t come from the audience. For a film that relies so heavily on special effects, the visuals are mostly dull and unengaging. A CGI-enhanced cyclops (Martin Bayfield) and a couple of other digital monsters are rare exceptions. When Perseus tangles with a two-headed chimera and then the Minotaur, the movie wakes up briefly, then immediately goes back to sleep.

And what’s with the weirdly all-over-the-map casting? Neeson is Irish, Worthington, Australian. Fiennes, Pike and a few others stars are British — though their dialects range from Shakespearian to cockney. Venezuelan Edgar Ramirez plays Ares, Hades’s partner in crime; Danny Huston, an American, portrays Zeus’s brother Poseidon like the Gorton’s fisherman; and Andromeda’s army sounds half Spanish, half French. None of them make an attempt to sound like they’re in the same movie, let alone the same country.

Call it “Clash of the Accents.”

Late in the film, Zeus says, “Let’s have some fun.” Nice try. (Never mind the incongruity of the most powerful of all gods uttering those words.) For a fleeting second or two it looks like “Wrath of the Titans” might actually deliver on that one promise. But the movie doesn’t even rise to the level of dumb fun. It’s inexplicable, not to mention inexcusable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
spacebear1Dec 8, 2017
This film is only slightly better than the previous film. The acting is still not great, the characters are still bland, and the special effects are still not so great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
anaadigiriAug 3, 2021
I started actually watching because it was a sequel to the 2010 hit and for the incredible CGI and Greek mythology, but I was taken by surprise! There's a deeper meaning behind the plot and a father and son relationship which deeply connectsI started actually watching because it was a sequel to the 2010 hit and for the incredible CGI and Greek mythology, but I was taken by surprise! There's a deeper meaning behind the plot and a father and son relationship which deeply connects you to the film. Eventually I also fell in love with the comic relief. It was an all-around enjoyable and entertaining action film. It doesn't attempt to be something it isn't. That's nice and straightforward, and I like it. If you're a Greek mythology or a fantasy genre fan, then this is definitely the movie for you!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
jamesfhallJan 19, 2022
"Wrath of the Titans" is probably the definition of a blah, forgettable, and overdone movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
next
Page:
More From This Movie

37 Critic Reviews

5.2 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL