Chloe
Sony Pictures Classics | Release Date: March 26, 2010
5.7
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 89 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
33
Mixed:
41
Negative:
15
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
5
grandpajoe6191Sep 26, 2011
"Chloe" is sleek and tense, but fails to maneuver that energy till the end of the movie.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
1
DukeNov 2, 2010
One of the weirdest films I have seen all year, and not in a good way. Oscar winners pair up to do a terrible film ..... what a shame. http://www.dukeandthemovies.com/search?q=Chloe
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
jonslowDec 8, 2018
Amanda Seyfried is so hot. She is so fit with this role. That's all I know. HAHAHA
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
1
FionaR.Mar 29, 2010
This movie is nothing but trash!! No message, no suspense no nothing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
jeffhMar 28, 2010
A very good erotic thriller with a great cast,Amanda Seyfried is an up-and-coming star and Julianne Moore is still gorgeous.Hearing Seyfried talk dirty will excite any red blooded heterosexual man.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
bdogMar 28, 2010
Preposterous. Hooker develops emotional attachment to THREE in the same family!?!? Superlative films don't need to show as much nudity as this one does--the saving grace(s) are the nude features of the female protagonists. Utter waste. Preposterous. Hooker develops emotional attachment to THREE in the same family!?!? Superlative films don't need to show as much nudity as this one does--the saving grace(s) are the nude features of the female protagonists. Utter waste. Attended NY premiere and was blown away at atrocity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
PabloRMar 28, 2010
Beginning starts off a tad slow, but once it picks up, it really picks up. Sad, slightly sexy, and really shocking. Good movie overall, and especially good acting from the lead roles.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
Lopez17Aug 11, 2010
I've seen many films just like or similar to Atom Egoyan's "CHLOE" I can name a few right off the top of my head: "Fatal Attraction"(1987), "9 1/2 Weeks"(1986), "Indecent Proposal"(1993), "Lolita(1997), "Disclosure"(1994). In addition,I've seen many films just like or similar to Atom Egoyan's "CHLOE" I can name a few right off the top of my head: "Fatal Attraction"(1987), "9 1/2 Weeks"(1986), "Indecent Proposal"(1993), "Lolita(1997), "Disclosure"(1994). In addition, one of the most infamous of the erotic thriller genre "Basic Instinct"(1992), now I ask you what all these films have in common. Simple they all have alluring femme fatale characters that try to seduce and kill and assert there power over men how theses beautiful and dangerous women and easily manipulate and control the men that are either after them or desire them. Theses type of films can go one of two ways 1. down the road of complete and utter absurdity and rampant sexuality(Basic Instinct, Lolita) that don't have a shred of intelligence and only serve the purpose of giving audiences some good sex scenes and nothing much else. On the other hand, the film can balance brains and sex to coherently tell an intelligent story of love, desire and family social angst (Fatal Attraction, Unfaithful, Eyes wide Shut) to make the film more than about sex. Itâ… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
CountryPetInnSep 13, 2010
It started out really good; good story good acting and eventually developed into what I thought was going to be a thriller. Some interesting twists to the plot...however. The end completely blows the picture. Really, really weakIt started out really good; good story good acting and eventually developed into what I thought was going to be a thriller. Some interesting twists to the plot...however. The end completely blows the picture. Really, really weak ending...my wife and I were disappointed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
raco2046Oct 4, 2010
I am an Atom Egoyan fan. This isn´t his highest moment yet is not disposable either. Julianne Moore is grand as a woman on the verge and Liam Neeson is quite believable as a hunky teacher. The son and Seyfried I could careless,I am an Atom Egoyan fan. This isn´t his highest moment yet is not disposable either. Julianne Moore is grand as a woman on the verge and Liam Neeson is quite believable as a hunky teacher. The son and Seyfried I could careless, notwithstanding the do 'work' the ensemble piece. Do have patience with this one, don't be hasty to discard it. I does deserve a second look.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
TaplingerJan 7, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. So many good actors, great direction, cinematography, sexual tension, eroticism, all ruined by an illogical script starting with the first scene - the whole movie is predicated on Chloe falling in love with Julianne Moore in the first scene in the bathroom. But they just met. And Moore's husband never slept with any of his students? Give me a break. And Chloe commits suicide in the end with a smile on her face? What exactly is the scriptwriter high on, and please don't ever offer me any.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
iamtrent424Nov 25, 2010
The story was okay. It could have been better. This movie was bored the first 10 min. It took a long time to get to the good parts. I wouldn't recommend you to see this on blu ray or dvd. But I think this a good movie to watch on hbo or showtime.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
bethesdabobMay 2, 2012
This movie is terrible. It's very, very predictable, even if you have only a little imagination. It only gets a good review from critics, because Liam Neeson is in it. Don't waste your time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
PurpleUrpNov 15, 2011
An interesting movie throughout but probably could've been better. The focus was more on the females' side of the story and less on the males; irrelevant, but lets say they got too much screen time! A one sided story that keeps the realityAn interesting movie throughout but probably could've been better. The focus was more on the females' side of the story and less on the males; irrelevant, but lets say they got too much screen time! A one sided story that keeps the reality out of the picture and bases everything on imagination.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
RegOzApr 18, 2012
This movie has surprised me! It is intense, rich, and deep. The original is the French movie 'Nathalie' with Emmanuelle Beart. 'Nathalie' is a classic and I did enjoy it, but I feel ' Chloe' was superior. In my opinion, Atom Egoyan hasThis movie has surprised me! It is intense, rich, and deep. The original is the French movie 'Nathalie' with Emmanuelle Beart. 'Nathalie' is a classic and I did enjoy it, but I feel ' Chloe' was superior. In my opinion, Atom Egoyan has delivered to us an improved story that I felt real. If you ask me to pick a flaw, I wouldn't be able to do so...at least not promptly. The art direction was great too, and all the actors's performances were excellent, but Amanda Seyfried was simply outstanding! If you have the chance to watch both of them, do it and then pick your favourite...but don't just trust the reviews...try it yourself!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mapizarroJun 22, 2013
"Chloe" is synonymous with sexual tension. It's avant-garde, a real erotic thriller. It's like "Eliana, sister-in-law" with a sexual tension with no resolving. Julianne Moore and Amanda Seyfried have good chemical connection. Good remake!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Meth-dudeJul 1, 2016
The acting was good but that's pretty much the only good thing about this movie. The story is not very logical and the characters are all pretty stupid.At least the movie was a little bit entertaining.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
BeatrixKiddoSep 11, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Enough with the gay propaganda!
Sorry, l have no problem with gay/lesbian people but enough with this over-advertising and propaganda. It's getting annoying and disgusting... yeah, l feel disgusted. The movie was so unrealistic, how can an hetersexual woman feel lust and desire for another woman? These things can't happen in real life. You are born as straight or gay or bi.. you know what you are from your teenage years. Also, if the wife hated cheating, why she cheated on her husband? Sounds rational but it's not realistic at all. Last but not least, the plot was so predictable and the acting nothing special. One of the stupidest (and most annoying) movies l have ever seen! I put 2/10 only for Liam Neeson.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

49 Critic Reviews

5.7 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL