Catwoman

Warner Home Video | Release Date: July 23, 2004

2.8	USER SCORE Generally unfavorable reviews based on 346 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

mds03Apr 16, 2013

Why was this movie just in the low standards of mediocre when it could have been pure gold? Don't get me wrong it had it's moments. But barely enough of them. The problems are that it wasn't constantly entertaining and the dialogue was atWhy was this movie just in the low standards of mediocre when it could have been pure gold? Don't get me wrong it had it's moments. But barely enough of them. The problems are that it wasn't constantly entertaining and the dialogue was at times bland and boring.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

kyle20ellisMar 27, 2022

I do much prefer Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman,a manipulative character with a crave for jewellery, not emphasised enough in this instalment, but not entirely missed. Unlike some people, I liked Halle Berry in the title role, I liked the sceneI do much prefer Michelle Pfeiffer's Catwoman,a manipulative character with a crave for jewellery, not emphasised enough in this instalment, but not entirely missed. Unlike some people, I liked Halle Berry in the title role, I liked the scene where she cuts off her hair and revealed her real self. Somehow she didn't look right with all that hair over her face. When she was Catwoman, she looked very sexy in that leather outfit. Now the script was weak at times, but I really liked the overall look of the film, with the splendid sets. The special effects were a bit ropey, and others where it looked part-animated, or like the Matrix, but they're weren't the weakest part of the movie, that was the script, which seemed rather muddled and trite. The supporting players, particularly Sharon Stone weren't that bad, and while slow-moving and predictable at times, neither was the plot. All in all, a fairly watchable movie, not the best superhero movie, but not the worst(Batman and Robin). 6/10 Bethany Cox.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

Toasty87Jul 12, 2020

It's a okish attempt the script goes haywire half way though and never recovers.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

clem666Mar 16, 2023

Kind of a promising start but the plot doesn't last long before being unecessarily jerky and dumb. In the end, the storytelling is awful, full of inconsistencies and of failed subplots. Characters are one-dimensioned stereotypes, particularlyKind of a promising start but the plot doesn't last long before being unecessarily jerky and dumb. In the end, the storytelling is awful, full of inconsistencies and of failed subplots. Characters are one-dimensioned stereotypes, particularly Catwoman who desperately tries to be two faces of the same coin.
CGI is fun, a bit outdated but still enjoyable despite some rare ugly scenes. Some scenes are quite interesting in their artsy way, but they are far too often overcut, mindnumbing and confusing.
Choregraphies are just dumb, diamond garbage that constantly defies the laws of gravity. Acting is barely okay.
Surely not a good movie but still doesn't deserve such low scores.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews