Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore

Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: July 30, 2010

4.9	USER SCORE Mixed or average reviews based on 73 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

AlanGJul 30, 2010

A horrible piece of crap. It makes the first one look bad. It makes battlefield earth look bad.

2 of 2 users found this helpful

MikeH.Jul 30, 2010

Really, it's rated PG for "Animal Action"? It's as if their making up things to rate it PG for. PG is the New G.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

SerchvazJun 4, 2020

Like his predecessor in this movie is a popcorn, it has a basic history, but it was taken in the right way, if you like basic movies you will enjoy this.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

NF123Aug 23, 2010

When I was growing up the first Cats and Dogs came out, however I'm now all grown up and have no feelings of love towards it, so when I had to take my cousin to see it, you could say I was horrified I liked the original in the first place.When I was growing up the first Cats and Dogs came out, however I'm now all grown up and have no feelings of love towards it, so when I had to take my cousin to see it, you could say I was horrified I liked the original in the first place. Where to start, the acting, CG and story are all inept. I will say Marmaduke looks worse but that's not a whole lot of praise. Overall I'd say if your child is around 5 s/he be entertained. But at around 7+ I'd recommend renting something… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

TheCriticAug 16, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. $85 Million Dollars was used to make this film. Where did the money go?!!?! Not in the story part of Cats and Dogs The Revenge of Kitty Galore. Seriously what company would wait for nine years to make a sequel to a film that didn't need one in the first place. I hated everything about this film. All it was was a rehash of the first films plot which involves a cat bent on taking over the world and some dogs trying to stop the mad feline. The only difference is that the dogs team up with the cats. This film made me laugh a few times, but not enough to recommend this movie. Plus the ending leaves opened for a sequel that will probably never see the light of day. Hopefully this is the final film in the Cats and Dogs Franchise.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

ESS180Oct 8, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A disappointment...

A big waste of time.

There was some jokes that were not funny at all like in one part you see the main villain from the first movie and he's in a hannibal lector costume i mean chidren don't know about that!

It was good for the first 5 minutes then it got stupid and annoying.

All in all it was pretty terrible.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

MovieLonely94Oct 26, 2010

I don't see why people don't like it. well I do. It was great entertainment, perfect visuals, and great comedy.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

daddy_boglinSep 15, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When I was growing up the first Cats and Dogs came out, however I'm now all grown up and have no feelings of love towards it, so when I had to take my cousin to see it, you could say I was horrified I liked the original in the first place. Where to start, the acting, CG and story are all inept. I will say Marmaduke looks worse but that's not a whole lot of praise… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

CourtneyP.Jul 31, 2010

It was an okay movie filled with corny jokes and dry humor. I just don't know why the film makers would spend $85,000,000 on something that would wind up to be a piece of crap.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

RickAAug 3, 2010

Great movie to take all the family to. I enjoyed this a lot and found it quite entertaining which is why I go to movies. I guess the critics go for deeper meanings to movies or something because I can not figure why it was so poorly rated by them.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

Forrestgump1Oct 9, 2010

"This was actually overall a pretty decent flick , not great or anything , no where compares to its predecessor , but i did like Bette Midler as the villain , the 3D was unnecessary , and the movie was cornballlish and predictable so a mild"This was actually overall a pretty decent flick , not great or anything , no where compares to its predecessor , but i did like Bette Midler as the villain , the 3D was unnecessary , and the movie was cornballlish and predictable so a mild recommendation" .. C+… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

cub317Sep 28, 2011

This is not a good movie at all! I can't believe I even went to see it! The plot is so unoriginal. It reminds me of James Bond, or some other secret agent movie. The acting is pretty bad also. It sounds like nails screeching on a blackThis is not a good movie at all! I can't believe I even went to see it! The plot is so unoriginal. It reminds me of James Bond, or some other secret agent movie. The acting is pretty bad also. It sounds like nails screeching on a black board. To be fair here, this movie is meant for little kids, but I was fourteen when I saw this. I thought it would be good, but it was terrible! I don't even like dogs!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

PeppersReviewsApr 27, 2012

A cute film, but don't expect anything too different or new from the first film.
Final Score: C+

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

KivaJun 11, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. the first movie was funny and entertaining. This film was boring and bad. I saw it on 3d and the 3d sucked. I liked the scene with The silence of the cats. This one was good. All the other movie was flying cats and dogs talking… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

Mordovan89Mar 5, 2014

No, no, and no, this film does not get more. What I see is a boring and repetitive work, with bad dubbing and a villain that gives shame.
The only thing I liked was .......... no, I do not find anything, and only give 5 so it is not so bad.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

emlugo123Feb 22, 2015

Cats and Dogs should not have added this piece of crap sequel. I fell asleep 30 minutes into the movie. This movie is definitely for kids 7 and under.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

homer4presidentMar 11, 2015

This isn't worth spending time watching. I would rather was dishes than watch this. My 3 year-old brother, 20 minutes into this movie asked if we could leave. How's that for a critic.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

PanchogulOct 2, 2020

La primera película fue un horrible pedazo de chatarra exagerada en cgi y un pésimo sentido del humor, sólo una secuela podía superar todo eso, pero para mal.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

EpicLadySpongeJan 14, 2016

Don't get me wrong, but I do love the attempt of cats and dogs fighting some evil (especially fighting Kitty Galore) and saving the day once again. Unfortunately, all of this was let down by the jokes this film had and it's not cool.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

gameguardian21Mar 20, 2016

While I love cats and dogs in real life, this was not what anyone really wanted. The plot is dumb, its dumb how animals would be fighting like this, and this is just no other reason to watch this hunk of garbage.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

StannyCartvskiOct 9, 2016

The only reason why I gave this a 4 was cats are good. Still cheesy and Dogs should be bad guys. Not a dog lover here. Plus, the graphics were bad and this is cheesy.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

Toasty87Jul 12, 2020

The film no one wanted yet we got it it's just really really bad with a rubbish story.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

ChadS.Aug 1, 2010

An announcement made over the PA during German Shephard's orientation is about as funny as anything in Zucker/Abraham/Zucker's "Airplane", the 1980 comedy classic that spoofed "Airport"-type movies, for instance, Jack Smight's An announcement made over the PA during German Shephard's orientation is about as funny as anything in Zucker/Abraham/Zucker's "Airplane", the 1980 comedy classic that spoofed "Airport"-type movies, for instance, Jack Smight's "Airport 75", the one with the stewardess flying the plane. Although "Cats and Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore" never quite gives "Austin Powers" a run for its money, as far as James Bond send-ups go, this unwarranted sequel is reasonably smart, especially when you consider it's primarily an exercise in talking animals, the most dreaded of all children movie subgenres. Nevertheless, the film has a brain, albeit a pigeon's brain, the size of a pea, as evidenced by the scene where a cat rides a motorcycle, a cat incognito, lodged inside a human dummy. In a lesser talking animals movie, the filmmaker wouldn't bother to acknowledge how people may react to the miracle of a kitty on two wheels. At Alcatraz, however, rather than have a cat mimic Hannibal Lecter, in yet another tired "Silence of the Lambs" parody, why not mimic the Zodiac killer instead, since the island prison is off the coast of San Francisco? In this alternative universe, cat and dog technology is clearly ahead of our technology, so the same should be true for canine and feline law enforcement. The animals could bitch and moan about how David Fincher got it all wrong. As for Kitty Galore(a chi chi voiced superbly by Bette Midler), her plan to turn the humans against the dogs sidesteps her real grudge, which is the humans themselves. The popular belief that dogs need human companionship more than cats could've been explored, as man's best friend, once again, would have to save the city from the Zodiac killer, a cat. Kitty Galore's hench-cat looks demented enough to play the part, but due to the constraints of a children's movie, the violence is tempered, limited to knives stuck in a stuffed toy, as the chi chi obviously doesn't need her human owner, a magician(played by Jack McBrayer)."Cats and Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore" eventually runs out of inspiration(there is the occasional funny line interspersed throughout the otherwise routine screenplay), and resorts to ripping off Barry Sonnenfeld's "Men in Black".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

RobwinzMay 4, 2020

I remember this one coming out and today I noticed it was on ITV2. So, I thought I'd give it a watch and it might have been the worst decision I've ever made.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews