Universal Pictures | Release Date: September 16, 2016
6.6
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 108 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
63
Mixed:
33
Negative:
12
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
victoratorSep 16, 2016
I highly recommend this movie if your wife is pregnant. We just went to see it today. We had the whole cinema to ourselves. I treated it as a burden and just to give some pleasure to her to see a girl movie. To my surprise it was really funnyI highly recommend this movie if your wife is pregnant. We just went to see it today. We had the whole cinema to ourselves. I treated it as a burden and just to give some pleasure to her to see a girl movie. To my surprise it was really funny and well made. I guess I matured a bit and I was enjoying myself and appreciating the production efforts to make the movie funny, current and relating to actual pregnancy problems. If I was single I would have never watched it but I am really glad I did. It's simply put a very good girl movie with something for the guys as well. I'm sure you will enjoy it even more if you are expecting a kid just like I am. Not perfect but definitely above my expectations. I wish all girl movies were like this. Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
7
TVJerrySep 19, 2016
Renée Zellweger is back in the title role: single again…until she meets and sleeps with a handsome American (Patrick Dempsey). Shortly after, she hooks up with her old flame (Colin Firth). When she discovers she's pregnant and can't determineRenée Zellweger is back in the title role: single again…until she meets and sleeps with a handsome American (Patrick Dempsey). Shortly after, she hooks up with her old flame (Colin Firth). When she discovers she's pregnant and can't determine the father, the 2 men vie for her affections. Like the predecessors, this film is breezy and fun. The women in the audience were laughing a lot more than I did, but I was still entertained. The pace is spritely and the situations amusing. The men are charming and her dilemma is sweet. Fans of the series will likely find themselves warmly rewarded. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
EpicLadySpongeSep 16, 2016
The true second Bridget Jones installment. It's actually the third installment, but the second one was truly not as hilarious as the first one so I claim this to be the second installment and return of the franchise. Bridget Jones's BabyThe true second Bridget Jones installment. It's actually the third installment, but the second one was truly not as hilarious as the first one so I claim this to be the second installment and return of the franchise. Bridget Jones's Baby represents another blast of laughter and it's been years ever since a Bridget Jones installment. Don't miss this. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
madmoviemanNov 29, 2016
There are few films that irritate me more than the original Bridget Jones’ Diary, and its sequel. Annoying, cheesy and dumb, I never found much enjoyment in them at all, which is the main reason why I was so surprised to like Bridget Jones’There are few films that irritate me more than the original Bridget Jones’ Diary, and its sequel. Annoying, cheesy and dumb, I never found much enjoyment in them at all, which is the main reason why I was so surprised to like Bridget Jones’ Baby so much. Finally giving the character a likable and interesting persona, whilst also delivering comedy and romance in a confident and fresh way, fortunately moving away from the repetitive first two films, this is by far the best film of the whole series.

To start off, I think the most important reason this film is so enjoyable is because it’s totally different to the first two films. As much as I didn’t like them, I recognise a large audience did. However, 13 years later, it would have been insane to churn out the same formula once again, but I was delighted to see that director Sharon Maguire and writer Helen Fielding managed to provide a different experience.

With Bridget’s now more ‘mature’ and confident persona, this film doesn’t try to be another Pride And Prejudice parody full of awkward slips and mishaps. Yes, there are still a good few clumsy moments, but that’s a part of Bridget’s nature that even I wouldn’t want to see disappear completely, but what this film does so well is manage the balance between idiotic comedy and a genuinely engaging story, making for a far more entertaining watch that allows you to both laugh and get engrossed in Bridget’s various adventures.

One more positive that comes from the story here is that it’s not as insanely focused on Bridget Jones alone. Whilst she’s of course still the main character, a lot of this film is actually dedicated to the characters played by Patrick Dempsey and Colin Firth, both of whom provide excellent comic relief, a different dynamic to Hugh Grant’s bad-boy vibe from the first two films, and an occasional welcome break from Bridget’s inner monologue, which is yet another point that makes this film not only more bearable than the first two, but far more well-rounded and genuinely interesting.

Finally, we can’t ignore Renée Zellweger’s performance here. Along with her character’s maturing, Zellweger gives a far more likable and reasonable performance, making Bridget so much more tolerable than before. Although she was never a huge issue in the first two films, seeing Bridget actually act like an adult throughout, rather than a third edition of a grown-up 12 year old girl, was very refreshing, and definitely made her character a lot more accessible and interesting for me.

Overall, I was really surprised by Bridget Jones’ Baby. It’s not only a funnier and more enjoyable watch than its two predecessors, but a welcome evolution for the series, taking Bridget’s ridiculous mishaps down a notch by providing more interesting storytelling, characters and romance, whilst also featuring some of the best acting and directing of the trilogy.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
GreatMartinSep 16, 2016
“Bridget Jones’s Baby” opens with Bridget Renee Zellweger) celebrating her 43rd birthday at home alone with a single candle in a cupcake. She is thinner than before, has a good job as a TV producer and without any prospects in the romance“Bridget Jones’s Baby” opens with Bridget Renee Zellweger) celebrating her 43rd birthday at home alone with a single candle in a cupcake. She is thinner than before, has a good job as a TV producer and without any prospects in the romance department. One of her past suitors, Daniel Cleaver (Hugh Grant) has died and she broke up with Mark Darcy (Colin Firth) who got married.

As only as movies can do it Mark reappears in her life just as a new man Jack Qwant (Patrick Dempsey) appears, she goes to bed with both (NO! Not at the same time!) and guess what happens! (Read the title of the film folks!) We, she and they spend the next hour and a half (out of 2 hours) trying to figure which one is the father. Yes there is an easy way to find out who the father is but then there would be no movie.

Should you not be able to figure out who the father is by the scene in the Italian restaurant you haven’t seen a lot of movies.

Zellweger’s British accent gets a little too heavy at times, Dempsey seems to never have shaved during the movie constantly having that ugly 5 o’clock shadow and Firth’s saving grace is that he holds back with the smiles so when he shows one he lights up the film.

The supporting cast does their job and the film provides a few, very few, laughs, some slapstick and almost no feelings.

“Bridget Jones’s Baby” is a pleasant film but if you don’t see it you won’t be missing a thing.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
0
thedaarkbattySep 24, 2016
Least funny movie I have ever seen. I did not even chuckle once. What the heck is this garbage. These ugly actors are jokes. I don't care about the baby of bridget. It's not interesting.
0 of 8 users found this helpful08
All this user's reviews
7
foxgroveOct 1, 2016
Renee Zellweger effortlessly reprises her wonderfully kooky character in this belated third film in the series. Although a touch over long, the movie is full of great British actors at their funny best, especially the excellent Emma Thompson.Renee Zellweger effortlessly reprises her wonderfully kooky character in this belated third film in the series. Although a touch over long, the movie is full of great British actors at their funny best, especially the excellent Emma Thompson. Only to be avoided by those who dislike having a good time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
LeZeeDec 24, 2016
This is a two-man job!

Unlike the first two films, this was not based on the book. Instead, it is an original screenplay that fills the gap between the second and the third book. So reading the third book before watching this film is a
This is a two-man job!

Unlike the first two films, this was not based on the book. Instead, it is an original screenplay that fills the gap between the second and the third book. So reading the third book before watching this film is a spoiler. Most importantly the fourth film is on, only officially have to be announced.

The original director returned to this, but I appreciate the story and the screenplay and people behind it. I did not think this sequel would work, but it exceeded my expectation. A simple story and very familiar settings, but developed so well. There's no Bridget's diary in this, instead an iPad.

Renee Zellweger was totally unrecognisable. Actually, I said that in my 'The Whole Truth' review. But she was good to return as Bridget. Colin Firth looks too older than his actual age, but was great in his part. No Hugh Grant, but a new competitor was introduced which is none other than Patrick Dempsey.

This is not the same kind of narration that we saw a decade ago. Because all the characters are aged, so according to the situation this story takes place. It's a two hour long film, but it had some good jokes. Those who enjoyed the first two would surely enjoy it as well. So choosing it to watch is not a bad idea.

7/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
marcmyworksSep 17, 2016
This film is such a great improvement to the last instalment in the Bridget Jones franchise. Based on Helen Fielding's column in the Independent (which ironically did not get made into the 3rd book), it really adds a new level of humour toThis film is such a great improvement to the last instalment in the Bridget Jones franchise. Based on Helen Fielding's column in the Independent (which ironically did not get made into the 3rd book), it really adds a new level of humour to our struggling Bridge. The only weakness is though the film starts off quite strong, it turns into a light comedy towards the end. Though uneven it is still enjoyable Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsFeb 18, 2017
Not my type of movie I guess, even though I did like the first movie far more better. This one was good, but it is more of a romantic movie than comedy here as I found most of the jokes not that funny. Decent movie but not for me
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
sefrabuNov 21, 2016
I was very disappointed by the latest book dairy and so was quite happy with the filmmakers' decision to follow a different storyline. The twist with the baby was promising and yet - sadly wasted. The film lacks the furry feelings you hadI was very disappointed by the latest book dairy and so was quite happy with the filmmakers' decision to follow a different storyline. The twist with the baby was promising and yet - sadly wasted. The film lacks the furry feelings you had watching this clumsy woman getting the impossible, you chuckle far less at her antics than you used to, and the resolution is awfully lackluster. Honestly, it could have been any average romantic comedy without Bridget Jones name on it, and if it was, it wouldn't go very high in the box office, if at all. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
smiyamotJan 21, 2017
Continuing the saga of Bridget Jones, she get's pregnant. But who, her old boss (who has died, maybe?, next movie) her childhood friend, a new American? Fine actors all, the story line is a bit pretentious, but you knew that already. Can IContinuing the saga of Bridget Jones, she get's pregnant. But who, her old boss (who has died, maybe?, next movie) her childhood friend, a new American? Fine actors all, the story line is a bit pretentious, but you knew that already. Can I say, what happened to Renee? She looks so different, maybe older, did she have surgery? I think it's her cheeks; her face looks thinner except when she smiles, the cheeks puff out and she looks like the old Renee we all know and love. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrAlexWildOct 12, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A Warm and entertaining film , filled with little laughs along the way, thankfully not full of adverts and binge publicity, perhaps they shouldn't keep swapping the child and making it obvious, but other than that a pretty good flick. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
MeLikesMeHatesMay 7, 2017
Waited too long. Doesn't look or feel like it's part of the same story. It does have a few chuckles, but overall it's blah. Should have filmed a little sooner and w/ Hugh Grant on board.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
lucbevibrasilOct 15, 2016
Fun and engaging, Bridget Jone's Baby brings back all the humor of the character, the love triangle that she lives, this time with Patrick Dempsey, and characters you kill homesickness. The film features excellent performances, especiallyFun and engaging, Bridget Jone's Baby brings back all the humor of the character, the love triangle that she lives, this time with Patrick Dempsey, and characters you kill homesickness. The film features excellent performances, especially Renee Zellweger, and all charisma of old movies. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JyroJyroSep 17, 2017
A surprisingly successful third outing for Bridget Jones, as pregnancy related hilarities ensue. It's a little too rooted in 'cringe' comedy to be consistently funny, despite the decent performances of the main cast. A fairly safe butA surprisingly successful third outing for Bridget Jones, as pregnancy related hilarities ensue. It's a little too rooted in 'cringe' comedy to be consistently funny, despite the decent performances of the main cast. A fairly safe but satisfying end to the trilogy. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
opinioNateit555Sep 20, 2016
I did wonder if Bridget Jones Baby would be as entertaining as the first movie in this series. It ticked all the boxes that have me shaking with laughter. Everything about this movie works, the storyline, the acting, the timing. If I foundI did wonder if Bridget Jones Baby would be as entertaining as the first movie in this series. It ticked all the boxes that have me shaking with laughter. Everything about this movie works, the storyline, the acting, the timing. If I found myself in similar circumstances as Bridget Jones, I doubt I would be laughing. The painful drama of others is always more hilarious than our own embarrassing moments. I don't pay money to analyse the plausible connection between fiction and real life. I go to cinemas to be entertained.
Bridget Jones Baby entertained me.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Roxxy299Sep 29, 2016
I enjoyed this movie. It was sweet and fun. As a person that enjoyed the original movie , I would definetly recommend. Anyone who liked the first movie will like this one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
finkenberg61Oct 1, 2016
Very funny film and Colin Firth will break your heart. He is so good. He made me cry. The weak link was Patrick Dempsey. He cannot act. Emma Thompson was a added bonus. I wish that Americans were supporting the film. It is a huge hit overseas.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
sakshigoyal89Oct 6, 2016
Finally got to watch the much awaited sequel depicting the next chapter from the life of silly Miss Bridget Jones. The movie lives up to its expectations. very entertaining and full of laughter. Totally worth the watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
dspratlinNov 19, 2016
What’s it about?

Helen Fielding’s down-to-earth 20/30/40-something creation is back, still struggling with life, and about to embark on her most extravagant adventure yet – a baby, whose paternal genes she’s not quite sure. What did I
What’s it about?

Helen Fielding’s down-to-earth 20/30/40-something creation is back, still struggling with life, and about to embark on her most extravagant adventure yet – a baby, whose paternal genes she’s not quite sure.

What did I think?

Let me start with a disclaimer – I hate Renee Zellweger in this role. I loved the books, and always thought the casting was deeply offensive to legions of great British actresses – her ridiculously twitching terribly-accented Bridget did nothing for me. Surprising, then, that I found this sequel to be rather good. Zellweger’s now utterly-toxin-ravaged face is difficult to watch, and she still overplays Jones obscenely, but there are some seriously funny – proper “pah!” LOL moments – and some brilliant turns from Colin Firth, Patrick Dempsey and, particularly, Emma Thompson as the obstetrician who, God bless her, is aging beautifully (i.e. naturally).

It drags a bit – two hours?? – but it’s got just enough of the good stuff to keep you going, thanks in no small part to Fielding’s work on the screenplay and Shazzer picking up the director’s reins once again. I’m shocking myself by saying this, but it’s worth a watch!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
FilipeNetoNov 7, 2021
A worthy end for Bridget Jones.

Overall, I liked this movie, and I think it represents a decent ending to the Bridget Jones trilogy. It's not a very good movie, but it's warm, it has a funny story and gives us back most of the characters we
A worthy end for Bridget Jones.

Overall, I liked this movie, and I think it represents a decent ending to the Bridget Jones trilogy. It's not a very good movie, but it's warm, it has a funny story and gives us back most of the characters we like. Personally, I like this movie more than its predecessor, which seemed more worn and soulless. In this movie, the unthinkable happens and Bridget got pregnant… but she doesn't know who the father is! On the one hand, it could be Mark Darcy, her eternal love, but it could also be Jack, a one-night stand she had at a festival.

The movie is predictably the last in which we'll see Bridget Jones and her adventures. Not only is the formula already quite worn out, but the actors have also aged and are now on another level of their lives. The biggest problem with this film, in fact, is the predictability of its script, where we can foresee with some certainty what will happen. Even who is the child's father! The jokes are nothing new, but sometimes they work, and the film is not happy about making us laugh, but it also doesn't upset us either. Unfortunately, I didn't feel the same chemistry among the trio of main actors that was observed in the past. The film has a series of uninteresting sub-plots, placed to fill time and space, because nothing relevant comes from any of them.

Again, Renee Zellwegger returns to one of the characters that brought her notoriety and fortune, but the actress already accuses her age, with visible wrinkles and a lack of joviality that the character also gradually assumes. She is a good actress, however, and gives us another very competent job, closing in the best way her work. At his side, a mature but elegant Colin Firth remains fresh and impeccable in the role of Darcy. Cast in this film, Patrick Dempsey did a satisfying job, but somewhat lukewarm, as was his character, an algorithmic intellectual who made his fortune with a social networking site. Emma Thompson is a good comedian, but the character is too serious for her to really put to use the comedic skills we recognize in her. Gemma Jones and Jim Broadbent are safe bets, but they are rarely really taken advantage of. Sarah Solemani is also a nice addition, but also adds little to the film.

Once again, the film takes on its British credits with a discreet but effective and functional cinematography, making the best use of the good scenery and also the excellent filming locations selected for the film. We have a good balance of light and shadow, good colors and excellent editing, with the film not wasting time or dragging. The costumes are also very good, and the soundtrack does its job well, without standing out or disappointing.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DawdlingPoetNov 26, 2021
This is a light hearted bit of fun - pretty much what you'd expect of a Bridget Jones film. Its funny in an awkward/cringe-y way at times, as ever. Its not a film to be taken too seriously or anything, of course. This film features a decentThis is a light hearted bit of fun - pretty much what you'd expect of a Bridget Jones film. Its funny in an awkward/cringe-y way at times, as ever. Its not a film to be taken too seriously or anything, of course. This film features a decent cast - Colin Firth, Jm Broadbent, Sally Phillips, Joanna Scanlan and Renee Zellweger as the titular character and Patrick Dempsey as Bridgets new 'man on the scene'. There's even a cameo by Ed Sheeran. Its not especially memorable but its a nice enough watch regardless - a good bit of fun which I'd recommend. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews