Boyhood

7

deanableJan 10, 2015

Good movie. Using the same actors over a 12 year period was very interesting but something was missing. I'm not even sure what it was but it wasn't there.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

PoundthoOct 12, 2014

Well executed throughout, yet lacking powerful insight or inspiration. Linklaters dialogue is continuously entertaining and interesting and mostly truthful and while the strategy in this filmmaking endeavor is admirable it's not inherentlyWell executed throughout, yet lacking powerful insight or inspiration. Linklaters dialogue is continuously entertaining and interesting and mostly truthful and while the strategy in this filmmaking endeavor is admirable it's not inherently meaningful in the way that it's tone, title and running time seems to suggest.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

tvnewsguidoAug 17, 2014

Engaging to the very end

It's a good movie - not great cinema.

Beyond the clever concept, Boyhood is little more than a coming of age film. It is warm and charming and feels very real. I enjoyed my time with these characters.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

soylinda21Oct 25, 2014

When I heard that this movie was shot for 12 years, I thought it was a brilliant idea. I was ready to be mind blown like the time I watched Gravity.
But when I finally watched it, I thought the film was aimless for the most part. I worriedWhen I heard that this movie was shot for 12 years, I thought it was a brilliant idea. I was ready to be mind blown like the time I watched Gravity.
But when I finally watched it, I thought the film was aimless for the most part. I worried this might be the case when I learned that the movie didn't have a set story and adapted itself to the lead actor's real-life experiences as it went along. My worry turned out to be true: it's basically just a bunch of unrelated events clumsily put together. I don't think even Linklater himself knew where the movie was going, until maybe the very end. I felt like the movie was wandering a lot. At the end of the day, I believe that the 12-year-long filming thing was mostly a gimmick.
Some people might argue that the very fact that there is no point in this movie is the good thing about it because the movie is life itself. Well, I'd rather watch a movie that has a clear beginning, middle, and end and actually knows where it's headed, because my own life is enough for a lifelike experience so to speak.
And another thing, I thought the movie was trying too hard with its political agenda. Sure, filmmakers can incorporate their politics into their work. But it only works when their political views are carefully interwoven with other things, which isn't the case in this film. And I'm a liberal like Linklater so that's saying something.
That said, I think Patricia Arquette gives an Oscar-worthy performance in the movie. She really saved the film for me.
I wouldn't necessarily call this a bad film, but it certainly doesn't deserve the hype and praise it currently gets.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

luislmfMar 3, 2015

Boyhood through simplicity achieved something that decades of movies didnt: give an unpretentious opinion about humanity and life.
Congratulations and thank you for this awesome movie.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

kevinpark14Aug 25, 2014

Great film. I loved almost everything about it. I wasn't as much about the end as I was with the rest of the film, but it was overall amazing. Would definitely recommend.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

rricetalksOct 3, 2014

For those of you who don’t know by this time, Richard Linklater’s film Boyhood started principal photography 12 years ago. And, over the course of those 12 years, Richard Linklater kept returning to his actors, Ethan Hawke, Patricia Arquette,For those of you who don’t know by this time, Richard Linklater’s film Boyhood started principal photography 12 years ago. And, over the course of those 12 years, Richard Linklater kept returning to his actors, Ethan Hawke, Patricia Arquette, his real-life daughter Lorelei Linklater, and new-comer Ellar Coltrane, who was 6 years old when the filming started, to craft a story over time about the challenges of a family growing up and changing as the parents try to survive and raise their children in the world. The film is long, clocking in at almost three hours.
The act of filming a story over 12 years creates challenges of its own that standard film schedules avoid. And one of the most remarkable things of the film is the manner in which passing time and the aging of the characters has been handled. There are no jarring jump cuts forward in time. No supers imposed on the screen to tell us it’s 2004. Or 2008. No jump cuts into the middle of the expected and well-worn rites of passage, the traditional indicators that mark the progression of life. High School graduation, College, first loves. There is so much more as each sequence slips into the next that the aging of the characters becoming almost incidental.
This is not a film that is concerned with the paradigms of Hollywood story structure as taught by screenwriting books. This is a film whose story structure and form has more in common with a documentary than it does with the traditional form of family drama. This is not the family dramas of the fifties and the sixties wherein some dark family secret has to be exorcised out from the family closet and dragged into the light of truth. This is a family drama that doesn’t plays itself out so much as just piles itself on event by event in continuous layers. Quite possibly, docudrama has finally found its true definition.
The film’s story starts with Olivia (Patricia Arquette) struggling as a single mother to bring up and support her two young children, Mason and Samantha. Money is always an issue for this young family and, in the opening of the film, it is clear the children’s father is absent. The issues of the material well being of the family are contrasted and played out against the family’s emotional needs and well being.
Mason Sr. returns from working in Alaska after being absent for a year and a half. The true nature of Mason Sr.’s role as the children’s father during his year and a half absence seems to be left intentionally ambiguous. The clashes between the two parents early in the film over past issues are also left deliberately vague. The mother and father don't play out the roles of protagonist and antagonist as they fight over their children. Richard Linklater has deliberately avoided that in favor of a storyline that is much broader than those story strictures would allow. It isn’t easy to pick a villain and a hero between the parents in this story. There are other villains that appear and disappear throughout the long arc of this film but the parents seem to grow closer and develop a respect for each other as they pursue independent lives.
This isn’t a story where the main character has a dream and pursues it. This is a story where characters have their dreams and must abandon them for their own good and the good of others.
It is evident that Mason’s father comes to maturation slowly. He is still a “boy” in the beginning of the film struggling to hold onto his adolescent ambitions of being a song writer and a musician while the demands of fatherhood pressure him to give up that pursuit . In the end, the best he can do is hand down the remnants of his adolescent ambitions to his son.But even in Mason Sr.’s delayed growth to full adulthood, there is value to be had. The still-alive boy in Mason Sr. allows him to connect to his children emotionally in a very vital and important way.
His willingness and demand to connect to his children on their emotional level and to feed his own emotional needs with theirs contrasts sharply with the disciplinarian and authoritarian figures of Mason’s stepfathers.
In this, the destructive power of misunderstood masculinity is on display in the role of fatherhood.
There is a dramatic circular parallel between Mason Sr. and Mason Jr. at the end of the film because all of this may well be the same for Mason. We leave Mason at the end of the film at the age of 18, one foot still in boyhood and one foot firmly on the path of his adult life. He is now studying to be a photographer in College and it remains to be seen as to whether or not he will be able to pursue his artistic ambitions or will he repeat the cycle of his father, relenting his artistic ambitions late in life by the necessities of survival.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

smd9Jan 14, 2015

I saw this movie because of all the hype, and while it is pretty fascinating to see the kids grow up in the film and be played by the same people, that's basically all the film has going for it. The story, while not necessarily bad, isn'tI saw this movie because of all the hype, and while it is pretty fascinating to see the kids grow up in the film and be played by the same people, that's basically all the film has going for it. The story, while not necessarily bad, isn't particularly interesting either. It's just the life of a boy, and many scenes will leave you wondering "what was the point of showing that?".

It's worth seeing for the novelty of being shot over 12 years, but that's about it.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

NerdConsultantNov 22, 2014

the film is very well put together and is a remarkable achievement in film making and i'll admit is a good movie and i enjoyed it but i would like a bit more of an actual plot rather than the concept of life itself. it has very good dialoguethe film is very well put together and is a remarkable achievement in film making and i'll admit is a good movie and i enjoyed it but i would like a bit more of an actual plot rather than the concept of life itself. it has very good dialogue and the charters very well played i feel like this is a real family. but i felt it was too long and with little plot i didn't feel as invested as i could be… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

LaraRNov 17, 2014

I had high hopes for this film but it just ended up being too drawn-out and anticlimactic. I'll certainly give the director a 10 for his commitment creating this in a period of 12 years, although, I think that was the only unique aspect aboutI had high hopes for this film but it just ended up being too drawn-out and anticlimactic. I'll certainly give the director a 10 for his commitment creating this in a period of 12 years, although, I think that was the only unique aspect about this film. It didn't leave me inspired and I felt like I wasted 165 minutes of my life. But, I processed what I had just seen and I guess, it was alright. This film is way overrated but the director definitely deserves praise for all his work.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

Le__XenomorphJan 19, 2015

Probably the most realistic family movie ever made. You literally grow up with the actors as the movie took 12 years to make and you can see a huge transition in the actor's ages. Boyhood is an instant and heartwarming classic that tells aProbably the most realistic family movie ever made. You literally grow up with the actors as the movie took 12 years to make and you can see a huge transition in the actor's ages. Boyhood is an instant and heartwarming classic that tells a grand story about a boy's life. 9/10 (Awesome)… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

OtakutacoJan 2, 2015

I don't understand why this movie had so many awards and praised thrown upon it like it was the most revolutionary movie since Star Wars.The movie was slow and blandly written and long as HELL(unlike interstellar, which was slow, but wellI don't understand why this movie had so many awards and praised thrown upon it like it was the most revolutionary movie since Star Wars.The movie was slow and blandly written and long as HELL(unlike interstellar, which was slow, but well written).Unfortuanetly it doesn't have too much of a plot too back it up,my expectations were also really high because of the awards.It's MASSIVE con is the fact that it is almost 3 hours long,if it were 1 hour and 30 minutes long, it probably could have been better. I also fell asleep during 3/4 of the movie, so I had my mom explain the rest of the almost non existent plot.
Over all, this movie is a bore, and you should instead spen your time watching the godfather, Star Wars, or kill bill (which are great movies by the way) over this movie… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

martins1977Jan 6, 2015

una gran pelicula, con condimentos de todo tipo, mas alla del formato, nuevo y la paciencia de todo el elenco mas el director que innovo en todo sentido, muy recomendable.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

EntreeFeb 22, 2015

It's probably one of the most, if not the most ambitious indie film in recent memory. It has a very natural feel to it, almost like watching a documentary, without being boring. It's definitely a film that I enjoyed watching immensely. WellIt's probably one of the most, if not the most ambitious indie film in recent memory. It has a very natural feel to it, almost like watching a documentary, without being boring. It's definitely a film that I enjoyed watching immensely. Well done Linklater, well done.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

ThisGuy2060Jun 11, 2015

The fact that the movie is so mundane is part of it's charm. The film does a good job of presenting the beauty in the things that we often take for granted. This is honestly about as natural of a film as they come, nothing feels contrived about it.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

notlawMar 24, 2015

I really cant understand all the hype surrounding this movie i mean yes it was filmed over 12 years which is original they get points there, its not a bad movie but doesnt really have much else going for it. Ethan and Partricia give goodI really cant understand all the hype surrounding this movie i mean yes it was filmed over 12 years which is original they get points there, its not a bad movie but doesnt really have much else going for it. Ethan and Partricia give good preformances and apart from wanting to punch the first drunken husband and getting a chuckle hear and there it doesn't really make you feel much else just drags on for ages with the main character leading a pretty boring life.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

Jk9785May 22, 2017

Nearly flawless. This movie was my favorite of 2014. The only flaw is that it is looooooooooonnnnngggg. However, it's performances and characters are certainly enough to keep you invested through its 2 hr, 45 minute runtime. If you have threeNearly flawless. This movie was my favorite of 2014. The only flaw is that it is looooooooooonnnnngggg. However, it's performances and characters are certainly enough to keep you invested through its 2 hr, 45 minute runtime. If you have three hours to spare, take a look at this masterpiece.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

azhar_Dec 30, 2017

this movie is amazing, very beautiful, and natural, one of the best movie ever, very recommended movie to watch and to understand.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

DrBlahBlahMay 2, 2017

One of the most overrated films in recent memory. The 12-year gimmick is amusing, but the writing is tedious and cliched, and the run time is an hour too long.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

GreatMartinAug 1, 2014

What has brought a lot of attention to “Boyhood” is the fact that the director/writer Richard Linklater took 39 days in 12 years to film this picture. He used the same boy, Ellar Coltrane, same girl, Lorelei Link later (yes, the director’sWhat has brought a lot of attention to “Boyhood” is the fact that the director/writer Richard Linklater took 39 days in 12 years to film this picture. He used the same boy, Ellar Coltrane, same girl, Lorelei Link later (yes, the director’s daughter) plus the main adult actors such as Patricia Arquette and Ethan Hawke as Coltrane’s divorced parents. The film is fiction covering a period of time from when Coltrane was 6-7 and Linklater was a couple of years older until we see the latter off at college and Coltrane, at 18, graduating from high school and he too is going off to college. We watch these two children grow into adults, physically, as they did in real life. Whether the same technique was used with Hawke and Arquette is hard to tell as they were/at the age actors don’t change too much physically.

The story is linear as we see Mason (Coltrane) going through life in Texas much as boys have grown all time. Samantha (Linklater) goes through her rebellious period, pink hair anybody?, and we too watch her grow up but the picture concentrates on her brother. Dad (Hawke) and Mom (Arquette) get divorced when the children are young and Mom keeps choosing wrong men though she is smart enough to go back to school, gets her degree and finds an excellent job as a college teacher. Dad goes though a period of not knowing who he is and what he wants and becomes a weekend Dad who spoils the kids and is the ‘fun’ parent while Mom is the stern, disciplining one. There is no doubt that both parents love their children.

It has been two hours since I left this film that is 2 hours and 40 minutes long and I still don’t know whether I like it or not but I am still thinking about it. Hawke and Arquette are as professional and good as you would expect with Hawke giving one of his best performances on film. None of the supporting cast makes a false step. It is watching Coltrane and Linklater as they grow that is spellbinding and the director took a chance not knowing if they could act expressing their changes over 12 years but he certainly can be proud of his daughter’s performance and Coltrane is a natural actor.

I think parents who have had teenagers, and watched them grow, will appreciate this movie more than a childless person but the latter will find this movie different from the run of movies about teenagers and the evolution of Samantha and Mason from children to adults.

This is a work director/screenplay writer Richard Linklater should be proud of and will be very involved with awards time.… Expand

8 of 25 users found this helpful817

All this user's reviews

10

CalvinCrackAug 13, 2014

It's hard to award this movie less than a perfect score, even though it isn't a perfect movie. It works so well for what it is, and is such a thoroughly enjoyable work of art, that it should be impervious to the judgment you'd pass on aIt's hard to award this movie less than a perfect score, even though it isn't a perfect movie. It works so well for what it is, and is such a thoroughly enjoyable work of art, that it should be impervious to the judgment you'd pass on a normal film. As it stands, Boyhood is a collection of mostly great scenes which cause you to laugh, tear up, or reflect on your own life. I saw the movie with my my sister and after it was all over she said to me "That was mostly a comedy." And to my surprise I agreed. But all the humor is so organic that it sneaks up on you, and I could say the same for the dramatic bits as well.… Expand

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

0

matheusmk123Feb 24, 2015

Um dos filmes mais chatos que já vi, agora todo mundo fala bem, mas tenta ver o filme sem tem sono, aposto que esse filme vai ser um daqueles considerados "cult" mas que ninguém vai se lembrar. Minha nota para o filme é 0 de 10.

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

2

Mike_MSep 10, 2014

I am a fan of Linklater, but I am just not seeing the love for this movie. I will give this movie its due for not being about empty bs, but it's definitely a melodrama for most scenes, and with very performatory acting on top of it. There'sI am a fan of Linklater, but I am just not seeing the love for this movie. I will give this movie its due for not being about empty bs, but it's definitely a melodrama for most scenes, and with very performatory acting on top of it. There's not a lot of depth or nuance here.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful37

All this user's reviews

9

csw12Jan 11, 2015

The strength of Boyhood is how real it felt, every conversation, every scene and every moment. Ambitious, ground-breaking and truly something special.

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

amboyAug 24, 2014

A remarkable project brought superbly to fruition. The auteur, Linklater, could not have known where this twelve year project would take him, and this leads to a film of remarkable spontaneity and urgency. What emerges is a portrait of aA remarkable project brought superbly to fruition. The auteur, Linklater, could not have known where this twelve year project would take him, and this leads to a film of remarkable spontaneity and urgency. What emerges is a portrait of a young man who has grown up seeing how his parents live and determined not to repeat their mistakes. The actors do their best film work ever. And the sense of how things change in a society you grow up in is finely observed. The whole thing has the flavor of French cinema verite at its absolute best.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

disorrisoSep 13, 2014

This is, right there, a top 5 movie in my opinion. It express from the normal issues to the most delicate of them and it feels good to watch. I just can't believe how ingenious the creator is, I mean this is history of art being made just inThis is, right there, a top 5 movie in my opinion. It express from the normal issues to the most delicate of them and it feels good to watch. I just can't believe how ingenious the creator is, I mean this is history of art being made just in front of us. I belive my point is that I want to thank you all who have participated in the creation of this masterpiece, this kind of thing that keeps me believing in humankind.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

SimpleMethodAug 5, 2014

I just saw it tonight, don't quite have the words to summarize how in love I am with it, but I certainly am. It's **** fantastic and the most truly original movie I've seen in quite some time.

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

Enforcer122Aug 14, 2014

What a profound film. Amazing scope, vision and creativity to do this. I've never seen anything like this before. Even though the story is reasonably normal, the story you see and the characters along the way feel so absolutely real, I had toWhat a profound film. Amazing scope, vision and creativity to do this. I've never seen anything like this before. Even though the story is reasonably normal, the story you see and the characters along the way feel so absolutely real, I had to remind myself it was just a film multiple times. A massive achievement in film, in my opinion.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

5

theoverhumanJul 29, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "Boyhood" comes with an interesting idea behind it, but never uses this gimmick for anything more than a tool to enhance the bildungsroman style of the story. We start off with a young Mason going through a very normal life and end with him graduating high school still a very normal, if slightly anti-establishment, attitude.

Although you might expect ~160 minutes and literally 12 years to create an interesting character, Mason never really comes into his own. We are shown many different stages of life and clichéd moments--but at a certain point seeing another youth look at lingerie magazines loses its humor and originality. None of the characters are especially memorable or go through any kind of arc. Sure, Mason changes over the years but not through what we see; what we see are only the most typical and forgettable scenes of Mason's life. Why do we need to see how cool a person Mason's dad can be (portrayed in the conventional method of 'divorced dad is more fun while divorced mom cares more about schoolwork') yet we never get to see his interests grow and develop? Why does Mason stop loving video games and move onto loving cameras?

The film subsists solely on the gimmick of aging. As mentioned before no character arc is fleshed out, even the mother continues to date men who end up being alcoholics. There is no real sustenance to this film, only ever becoming captivating in its nostalgic reminders about video games, TV shows, or technology changing over the years. While this does give moments of entertainment, the whole film sags around these sequences.

The cinematography, praised for "loving Texas" in various reviews, does little to enhance the banal change from place to place. Not once was there a shot even close to the immensely superior *Paris, Texas* which, in a much shorter amount of time, showed us more unique and memorable locations than anything present here in Boyhood.

In conclusion, Boyhood is all hype. If the idea interests you, at least try to spend little money watching it. For real character development you could go to almost any other movie, even for a film with character development but little explanation you could at least watch some Maurice Pialat. Nothing in this film is special except for a dedication that only really comes across in the two child actors, and even then is never used for little more than visual continuity. Please, watch something else and save your time.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

thurley45Aug 7, 2014

100 rating on this movie is a joke. The one stunt of using the same actor over a 12 to 15 year period is interesting but it doesn't make a good movie a great movie. At 2 hours and 40 minutes it requires a lot of patience. I found myself100 rating on this movie is a joke. The one stunt of using the same actor over a 12 to 15 year period is interesting but it doesn't make a good movie a great movie. At 2 hours and 40 minutes it requires a lot of patience. I found myself asking again and again "When does the shooting start?" Well it never did. It's a serious movie, about teenage angst and family problem, but more depressing than uplifting. I think it is worth seeing, but don't pass up American Hustle or Wolf of Wall Street to see this.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

9

ryanneevmanAug 25, 2014

Even though he does succeed in doing so, Linklater's goal is not to impress, but rather tell a story about an average boy's life, and tell a story he sure does.

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

atmanSep 2, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I have to give points for the creative idea behind the film. Filming every year for twelve years is quite the feat, especially when it involves children. And without a doubt, the film was very compelling and it strongly resonated emotionally with me. But there were a few glaring flaws that prevent me from giving it the fawning reviews some other people have given it.

For starters, we never find out what happens to the stepsiblings. Did their dad kill them? Did they kill him? Did they run away from home? Did he lose custody of them? Did the whole family die in a housefire from when the dad fell asleep drunk on his bed smoking a cigarette? Here we spent half an hour getting to know these kids and see their connection with the main children, and yet they're not even mentioned a single time in the second half of the film?

Another thing that REALLY bothered me was how the second stepdad just vanished. In one scene he's telling the boy "I pay for you and your mother to live in my house" and by the next scene he's nowhere to be seen. No mention of a death, divorce or separation. The mom talks about selling the house because "I can't afford it." Seriously, how is there NO mention of her husband after that?

Finally the last thing that bugged me was the scene where the boy is in 8th grade and is hanging out in the house with his friends, his friend's older brother and the brother's friends. Honestly this scene had the worst acting I can recall ever seeing in any movie. It honestly seems like they only did a single take of the scene.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

papeadojhonDec 17, 2014

Maravillosa, impresionante y excelente, Boyhood es una película que sin duda quedará en la historia, es una increíble inspección al crecimiento de la mayoría de los niños hoy en día. Además también cuenta con un muy talentoso elenco queMaravillosa, impresionante y excelente, Boyhood es una película que sin duda quedará en la historia, es una increíble inspección al crecimiento de la mayoría de los niños hoy en día. Además también cuenta con un muy talentoso elenco que ofrecen actuaciones de primera.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

10

keith-sJan 14, 2015

Amazing. The arc of a boy's childhood from ages 6 through 18 is portrayed in real-life-feeling events. They are dramatic in the way signposts and experiences in our own lives are, and not in the way movies generally create drama (violence,Amazing. The arc of a boy's childhood from ages 6 through 18 is portrayed in real-life-feeling events. They are dramatic in the way signposts and experiences in our own lives are, and not in the way movies generally create drama (violence, disasters, etc). I love director Richard Linklater's 'Before Trilogy' and I waited for this movie with great anticipation. It did not disappoint. The acting was top-notch across the board. If you want a unique and satisfying movie, this is it.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

0

bo100Feb 21, 2015

There was absolutely no plot to this movie except to have a few subliminal political messages continually bashing Bush, Fox News and Republicans, while at the same time flaunting sex, alcohol and drug use by minors, while a hard working MomThere was absolutely no plot to this movie except to have a few subliminal political messages continually bashing Bush, Fox News and Republicans, while at the same time flaunting sex, alcohol and drug use by minors, while a hard working Mom gets constantly abused by the men in her life. It was like watching a liberal campaigning for office bringing up just about every liberal hot topic to push down the throats of its viewers. As expected, because of this the liberal media and Hollywood will love this movie, hence all the Oscar nominations.

It would be nice to see a movie that had no political overtones (liberal or conservative) to it be nominated once in a while, but that is not what drives Hollywood.

With that being said, it was a brilliant idea to film these characters over an 11-12 year period. There was just no storyline and it ended making you fell like you were waiting for there to be some type of conclusion and/or wondering if you missed something. After watching the movie a 2nd time, I realized I did not miss anything, because there was nothing to miss. There was no point to this movie except for watching the characters grow up physically. A complete waste of time-twice!… Expand

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

10

RoulerAug 1, 2014

Esta clase de peliculas son las que te hacen profundizar sobre diversos aspectos de tu vida y a la vez son un gran respiro para los amantes del buen cine.

No digo que no sean entretenidos los blockbusters para pasar un buen rato conEsta clase de peliculas son las que te hacen profundizar sobre diversos aspectos de tu vida y a la vez son un gran respiro para los amantes del buen cine.

No digo que no sean entretenidos los blockbusters para pasar un buen rato con explociones, guerras y guiones sin sentido adornados con muchos efectos especiales que es lo que los grandes estudios de hollywood normalmente nos ofrecen cada verano.

Por eso Boyhood me parecio tan fascinante un proyecto genial, lleno de momentos e imagenes de espectacular belleza que te hacen reflexionar, pensar y hasta profundizar por la cadencia que tiene el film y sobre todo porque no cae en formulas sencillas para hacer sobresaltar al espectador, sino más bien una propuesta solida, profunda y a la vez sencilla, en pocas pallabras ¡¡¡me encanto la pelicula!!!… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

10

SeanGamerDaysAug 15, 2014

I was really proud of Richard Linklater works. It's really a biggest, sad, great, and the best-of-the-best movies, i ever watched! I cry alot like watching "The Fault in Our Stars" (too late for doing that review, but whatever...). If thereI was really proud of Richard Linklater works. It's really a biggest, sad, great, and the best-of-the-best movies, i ever watched! I cry alot like watching "The Fault in Our Stars" (too late for doing that review, but whatever...). If there is 1000/1000, I will give this good movie a 1000 score, but man, i think thats too much.....… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

9

JohnnyScumbagJul 20, 2014

The movie is fantastic, needless to say. As a person who grew up during the same time frame, it was like seeing bits of my childhood come to life and leading into college which I am in now. The authenticity is perfect as it was shot duringThe movie is fantastic, needless to say. As a person who grew up during the same time frame, it was like seeing bits of my childhood come to life and leading into college which I am in now. The authenticity is perfect as it was shot during the actual years it's depicting in the film. However the political propaganda could have been excluded from the film for the sake of social/political differences. There were a few bits of social propaganda as well such as the depiction of a "confederate flag waving anti-democrat southerner." But all in all the film was fantastic. I felt the depiction of the children was a little stereotypical as well. Not every teenager is a pop-singing, drug taking, beer chugging, soulless, mumbling, whatever-attitude, sex starved, anti-parent child. In fact, most of them don't fit that depiction. I was hoping for a different and more realistic depiction of teenagers from this movie. I only give the film a 9 for those two reasons for which I usually take 3-4 marks off, however this film started with a 12 rating because of its innovation and uniqueness. Will definitely go down as a classic in cinema.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

6

JalemanyJun 16, 2015

Ok, yes, it is quite awesome that the movie is shot during 12 years using the same actors. Since this is film about growing up, that fact is quite important. BUT, since this is not a documentary, just a fiction piece, we couldn't care less ifOk, yes, it is quite awesome that the movie is shot during 12 years using the same actors. Since this is film about growing up, that fact is quite important. BUT, since this is not a documentary, just a fiction piece, we couldn't care less if the kid, teen, young adult, is the same person or not. Who cares. The point is that as narrative story is flat, it lacks depth and character insight ... too much time span, too many broad strokes. It was entertaining, just that.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

doctor_rudeAug 18, 2014

It's a unique movie for sure. An impressive 12 year, or so, project. After it was all said and done, I thought the film was pretty good. I was not blown away at all. I'd maybe give it a 7.5. A little long, I started to doze off towards theIt's a unique movie for sure. An impressive 12 year, or so, project. After it was all said and done, I thought the film was pretty good. I was not blown away at all. I'd maybe give it a 7.5. A little long, I started to doze off towards the end. My wife and I were the only ones in the whole theater. I don't think many people are going to see this film, because no one is aware it exists.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

jgzegerJan 31, 2015

You can count me among those who think this movie is over-rated. Don't get me wrong, it's a good movie, but if this is the best movie of the year then there isn't much for me to look forward too. On the plus side, kudos to Richard LinklaterYou can count me among those who think this movie is over-rated. Don't get me wrong, it's a good movie, but if this is the best movie of the year then there isn't much for me to look forward too. On the plus side, kudos to Richard Linklater for making a well-directed film, but what really is the point of the whole exercise -- to make a movie that was shot over a period of 12 years with the same actors in the end as where there in the beginning? Well, that's quite a feat I admit, but it doesn't automatically translate to an entertaining film. I guess it helps to be a parent which I'm not. You can hold that against me if you like.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

geedupDec 2, 2014

I can't say more than the opther nearly 600 reviews have not said about this movie. I liked the premise of the movie, which I don't remember seeing/knowing about-same cast for multi years as they grow up in a movie. Also I liked Ethan's roleI can't say more than the opther nearly 600 reviews have not said about this movie. I liked the premise of the movie, which I don't remember seeing/knowing about-same cast for multi years as they grow up in a movie. Also I liked Ethan's role in the movie as well as the mother's changes in the movie. What I didn't like, or expected more of (thus the 9 rating) was better acting. The main character/boy, along with others, couldn't seem to pull off any thing-like crying or anger. None the less I will keep this one in my movie collection.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

dyshpoMar 22, 2015

Dyshpo's Law

1. When a film has more than 3 producers it shall suck.

2. When a film has more than 2 writers it will suck.

3. When a film has more than 1 director it will suck . (excluding animation)

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

francisrgoDec 7, 2014

The movie is about the reflection of time and how people live their daily lives. It focuses on how we manage pain and love. Though regrettably the only thing I find wrong about the movie is over more than a decade Olivia Evans, played byThe movie is about the reflection of time and how people live their daily lives. It focuses on how we manage pain and love. Though regrettably the only thing I find wrong about the movie is over more than a decade Olivia Evans, played by Patricia Arquette, has never really learned or come to terms her mistakes and past. The movie is done over 12 years and wouldn't in that time frame she have learned anything.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

PsychefanAug 22, 2014

"Boyhood" is certainly a remarkable film. However, I do not consider it a great one. There is no perceivable plot. We see a very realistic portrayal of children growing up in abusive situations and the effects on them. However, it is not"Boyhood" is certainly a remarkable film. However, I do not consider it a great one. There is no perceivable plot. We see a very realistic portrayal of children growing up in abusive situations and the effects on them. However, it is not a story per se. The is no beginning, middle and end other than the gaining of independence. There is not overt growth of character, just methods of coping. I would highly recommend this film for psychology students, parents who are abusive and perhaps victims of abuse who may have their feelings validated. People seeking entertainment or escapism from film should not go see this film.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

wowtahAug 16, 2014

Great concept, not so great execution. Yes, it is cool that they took 12 years to film the same group of actors, but as far as plot goes, it wasn't very impressive. Lots of stuff about not really anything, just how life goes. If you go aroundGreat concept, not so great execution. Yes, it is cool that they took 12 years to film the same group of actors, but as far as plot goes, it wasn't very impressive. Lots of stuff about not really anything, just how life goes. If you go around and follow people for 12 years, make a documentary, and show the world what really happens in 12 years. Since -in this case- they wanted to create a work of fiction, i'm a little disappointing about what they came up with. Felt also a little cheap how they put in all kinds of references to 'how the world was at that time', like talking about cellphones, text messages, Facebook profiles etc. Again, if this was a documentary, that would be fine. But as a work of fiction, i'm disappointed.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

the_dude81Sep 18, 2014

First thing to know about this movie is that it is different. And I'm not talking about being filmed over 12 years with the same actors. More importantly, this movie is extremely understated and there is no discernible plot besides 12 yearsFirst thing to know about this movie is that it is different. And I'm not talking about being filmed over 12 years with the same actors. More importantly, this movie is extremely understated and there is no discernible plot besides 12 years in the life of a boy and his family. Thus, there are no arcs and climaxes - this movies IS plodding, as some have described it. This movie is first and foremost about life and in being so moves at the pace of life - not the pace of a hollywood blockbuster.

That's not to say there is no rhyme or reason to this movie. There is no defined plot but the scenes are not random. The movie is a collection of vignettes which build on each other and important aspects of life are all there but none of them are so overwhelming to replace the central theme which is simply life. In this sense, Boyhood is a profound achievement.

I finished watching this movie with a lingering and deep sense of emotion and reflection. I don't really know how to describe it but I feel like every other movie I've watched before this one was relatively contrived or overproduced. I think this is the power of this movie.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

TheDude-Jul 19, 2015

Boyhood was a stellar film for the first half the main character was likable and had some good dialogue but the second half is a whole different story the dialogue is stale, the main character becomes an unlikable hipster conspiracy theoristBoyhood was a stellar film for the first half the main character was likable and had some good dialogue but the second half is a whole different story the dialogue is stale, the main character becomes an unlikable hipster conspiracy theorist douchebag and just loses everything it had built up.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

SkipSheffieldAug 30, 2022

The most boring movie of all time. I fell asleep watching this, woke up, rewinded it and fell asleep again. The cure for insomnia: Boyhood

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

darkbeast119Jan 23, 2015

Boyhood is a coming of age film directed by Richard Linklater which is over two hours long and let me tell you, it was 12 years for absolutely nothing. all the young actors are more or less incredibly lifeless and Ellar Coltrane goes fromBoyhood is a coming of age film directed by Richard Linklater which is over two hours long and let me tell you, it was 12 years for absolutely nothing. all the young actors are more or less incredibly lifeless and Ellar Coltrane goes from being a innocent kid to a miserable and pathetic young man who looks like a druggie Justin Bieber. it was super duper **** and the only good thing was the actress who played mason's mother who was really acting and showing some emotion. Boyhood is a film for poor butt sucking critics who lives are terrible and can relate with a film that gives a dark view on how life is really terrible. I can't believe that rotten tomatoes and metacritic gave this film high scores, either because they don't know what real films or they just have their heads up their prideful asses. Boyhood is a disgrace to modern day cinema and is the absolute worst and I mean worst film of 2014.… Expand

4 of 17 users found this helpful413

All this user's reviews

7

GetbusylivingAug 20, 2014

It was an okay movie, I enjoyed watching it. But it isnt that great by any stretch. If you've seen any of the Before Sunrise Trilogy you should know what to expect. The implications of the subject matter are preachy, even if I happen to agreeIt was an okay movie, I enjoyed watching it. But it isnt that great by any stretch. If you've seen any of the Before Sunrise Trilogy you should know what to expect. The implications of the subject matter are preachy, even if I happen to agree with most of what's been said. I'm sure it will win a ton of awards but in my opinion its nothing special.… Expand

6 of 29 users found this helpful623

All this user's reviews

0

Anonymous_1Sep 15, 2014

Synopsis: Basically a left-wing, misandrist propaganda movie about the life of a drug-abusing, alcoholic, womanizing teenage delinquent; his airhead single mother; and all of the bad, disposable father figures the boy had in his life.Synopsis: Basically a left-wing, misandrist propaganda movie about the life of a drug-abusing, alcoholic, womanizing teenage delinquent; his airhead single mother; and all of the bad, disposable father figures the boy had in his life.

Score Breakdown: Plot 0.2/10, Left-Wing Agenda -100/10, Total Score 0/10… Expand

9 of 44 users found this helpful935

All this user's reviews

0

boubadiopFeb 19, 2015

A very long and boring film. Watched it on a long plane journey and I'm sure it made the the journey worse, The main character becomes this annoying kid who you just really cant be bothered listening to because of his unenthusiastic doucheA very long and boring film. Watched it on a long plane journey and I'm sure it made the the journey worse, The main character becomes this annoying kid who you just really cant be bothered listening to because of his unenthusiastic douche bag voice. You watch the film the whole way through because of the major hype and excellent reviews waiting for something to happen but the ending is just one big fart in the face and really not worth your time.… Expand

4 of 20 users found this helpful416

All this user's reviews

10

fiabegJul 30, 2014

One of the aspects of the movie that is very interesting: Growing up in a broken family, Mason lives constant stressful interactions with his parents and stepfathers. Many times adults are in their own world and they have little empathy. HeOne of the aspects of the movie that is very interesting: Growing up in a broken family, Mason lives constant stressful interactions with his parents and stepfathers. Many times adults are in their own world and they have little empathy. He doesn't like it. He has to cope.
On the other hand he has very nice moments with his father who tries hard to be the best parent he can be. The mother tries too but it is a different story. Also we see some nice family gatherings.
Beautiful movie that makes the audience experience the process of growing up.
Richard Linklater took twelve years to shoot this film. This is breakthrough, something that has never done before,truly a master piece.… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

8

dierregiAug 13, 2014

I am usually not a big fan of "documentary style" movies, which are an excuse for sloppy scriptwriting, poor editing and bad photography. Following the life of a boy from primary school until college may easily have fallen into the category,I am usually not a big fan of "documentary style" movies, which are an excuse for sloppy scriptwriting, poor editing and bad photography. Following the life of a boy from primary school until college may easily have fallen into the category, but it has none of the above problems.

The main character is Mason Jr. (Ellar Coltrane) literally "growing up in public". Arquette plays mom Olivia and Hawke is dad Mason Sr. Annoying Lorelei Linklater (the director's daughter) plays sister Sam. The script moves swiftly through some important moments in Mason Jr.'s life from age 6. Dad is often absent and has problems accepting "real" life, such as a normal job which would not fulfil his dream of becoming a famous musician. Mom tries to improve family life and fails, marrying an abusive drunkard professor.
Mason Jr. is relocated a couple of times, losing his childhood friends and going through the difficulties of adolescence, compounded by mom's divorce, new job and new boyfriend.

However, the best part of the movie for me was the normalcy of the situations. No super-drama, just ordinary life with the usual disappointments and small traumas (bullying at school, first love, etc…)
Luckily we are spared Mason Jr.'s first sexual experience and explanations about what is going on in his head. We observe him and may be reminded of episodes from our own childhood, such as why our parents made us play the "game of silence". Anybody can find a familiar episode, which will probably remind us that there is just a limited number of "first" experiences in our life.

Coltrane is fine as the young introverted boy, but I started to dislike him as a gloomy adolescent. I am not sure which part of it was acting. The scene with Mason Jr. and his girlfriend walking around Austin a whole night might have been an ideal link with the "Before" series, unfortunately Coltrane does not have much of the charisma and acting skills of Hawke.

Finally, the first 2/3 of the movie move smoothly, but the story gets stuck towards the end, just when morose teenage Mason Jr. gets most screen time. Contrary to the "Before" series, I am definitely not interested in a follow-up.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

7

prabhuSep 25, 2014

The name 'boyhood' is kind of misleading although the movie's shown
only about the boyhood of Mason until he goes for his graduation to some college and get interested in photography.
Critics really liked more than people do! Because theThe name 'boyhood' is kind of misleading although the movie's shown
only about the boyhood of Mason until he goes for his graduation to some college and get interested in photography.
Critics really liked more than people do! Because the project had
enough risks for a successful execution but Richard Linklater did it,
its really something that have never seen before something unique and
risky. From 2002 to 2013 total of 45 days of shooting until the boy
grew up from his age 7 to 18. Such a long contract with the crew and if
Richard dies then who'd manage the such long project! Of course Ethan
Hawke, one of Richard's favorites but Linklatet did it. It shows what
happens to our life with every passing time and according to him
nothing. You grow up, you struggle, you baffled, you are taken care of
then fall in love, get married, have kids..and what happens? Life goes
on...but nothing really happens. To illustrate this he took the life of
a 7 years kid, Coltrane and changed his name to Mason in the movie. I
like Ethan Hawke, he's the first choice of Richard's movies especially
for his before sunrise series, most of Richard's movies which are
usually dramatic so Ethane was perfect to be a jobless dad who tries to
direct the right path for his son and every year with Coltrane he shot
the movie.

I really like the father-son scenes in which they talk about everything
and Mason gets advices from his father. They talked about movies like
star wars if there's a possibility of it to another one and that
happened too, what they predicted in 2008 that came true!!, brilliant.
Excellent achievement of the director and how realistic the movie
is,what a potential remains in the movie! 12 year project doesn't or
couldn't contain some top rated actors especially the theme
character,Mason. Coltrane was a risky, unpredictable one. I can't say
he did that great as the movie deserves but It was such a great risk if
the main character would have failed! But he did well not like the
growing characters of harry potter movies but OK for the slow soothing
unpredictable 12 years project. Various changes in a decade can happen!
That altered number of changes to Mason, in her character, attitude.
Except him even in our life cool electronics stuffs like no one uses
the old phones or old vintage saloon cars new smartphones and beautiful
cars are everywhere. His dad finally sells his Pontiac GTO although he
loves that! There's something called emotional attachment, kids are
like that! Especially kids are attached, so Mason stared a horrible
perplexed look at his dad's most loved car when he sold that so he
could by a new car for his son when he turns to 16. Again, a baffled
look while her mother meets the professor, Bill and talks like she's
getting attached to him Why does that happen? Doesn't dad love his mom,
but its the responsibility the capability that control's you and like
every creatures on the earth human too get attached to those who can
give them a better environment and then what happens? Nothing! Life
goes on. This is the most important essence the movie stands upon.
Nothing really happens in the movie. His mom then gets married to
another guy till she stands upon her own feet becomes what she wanted
to be and then in the ends she asks what shall happen to her, she
sacrificed most of his life for her kids and in the end what happens to
her? Of course, the answer is nothing. But 2hr 45min can be really boring if you're not that into drama movies or even if you are you can still feel it because of this boring but true factor 'nothing'. There isn't anything in the storyline to be entertained or inspiring but the direction and the labour in the movie, the time it took the pain isn't that possible for every directors. Its a new style a unique and significant one of movie direction. That's what everyone loves about. The story isn't epic rather boring, the actors aren't that great rather unknown, the movie is what that everyone's life is about, nothing but the project is fascinating yet magnificent by Richard Linklater.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

1

lhedemannAug 17, 2014

Wow , the most boring and drawn out rubbish i have ever seen.What a waste of 3 hrs.I as not alone in falling asleep in the cinema , a movie about dribble.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

danachitAug 23, 2014

In the book Brain Rules, the author states that in order for our attention to be in full engagement, we need a re-set every 9-10 minutes. Anything works - a laugh, a cry, a shock, fear. Some sort of emotional shakeup to re-grab our attention.In the book Brain Rules, the author states that in order for our attention to be in full engagement, we need a re-set every 9-10 minutes. Anything works - a laugh, a cry, a shock, fear. Some sort of emotional shakeup to re-grab our attention. After the initial novelty of the aging actors wore off, say...at about 30 minutes into this film, I fell into a numbing state of boredom that lasted until the end of this very. long. movie.

I began to wonder about dinner, my plans for the following day, just what was that weird smell in the theater... But most of all, I wondered, "For the love of gawd, when would this movie ever end??" I kept glancing at my watch, shifting in my seat, wondering if my companion was feigning interest (she was). The story was just boring. A boy, his mom, his sister, school, family matters, driving, girl issues...sure the acting was good, it was interesting to note the various facial changes as the younger actors aged, but that just wasn't enough to carry the movie. This movie has cured..totally cured me of following the advice of the professional movie reviewers.

Movies are suppose to entertain. If I walk out thinking I would never, ever want to endure a film again, then in my opinion, it didn't accomplish what it set out to do. King's Speech or Hundred Foot journey...those were two great films where the story carried the plot along at a nice clip and kept me engaged. Boyhood contains good acting but plan to be bored after the first hour.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

1

3bytheseaSep 11, 2014

Oh my... Where do I start other than to say than this movie took 2 hours and 45 minutes of my life I can never get back! Boy did Linklater really miss an opportunity here to capture what was really going on for this young boy who turns teenOh my... Where do I start other than to say than this movie took 2 hours and 45 minutes of my life I can never get back! Boy did Linklater really miss an opportunity here to capture what was really going on for this young boy who turns teen who turns young adult. You see a mom who twice makes poor choices in men and we never really know the depth of the impact this has on not only this boy but his sister. How did it feel for them to leave their step siblings so abruptly...no one knows, the movie transitioned and never dealt with the psychological repercussions for all involved. The bullying that is often so pervasive for boys in middle school...bathroom scene took all of a couple minutes of a 2 hr. 45 min movie...really? Boys have their own complexity and this movie was nothing but superficially going through the motions for far too long. Where was the editor? While Ethan Hawke was a like able character and perhaps in the end the most put together adult, couldn't help but feel his role and style of his dialogue was a mere extension of his character in Linklater's trilogy Before Sunrise, Before Sunset and Before Midnight. If you want insight as to the depth of how boys really feel...You will NOT find in in this movie. The critics lack depth by rating this movie so high. Pay attention to the user reviews, not the critics...if you do, it's at your own risk!… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

6

zerox720Mar 6, 2016

I mean, the movie certainly isn't bad, but it for sure doesn't deserve all of this critical acclaim. I mean its just not that good of a movie. I think other people may really enjoy this movie because it does have a lot of the elements of aI mean, the movie certainly isn't bad, but it for sure doesn't deserve all of this critical acclaim. I mean its just not that good of a movie. I think other people may really enjoy this movie because it does have a lot of the elements of a movie that would get critical acclaim, but it's just not good enough to get all of it.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

3

psvJul 18, 2014

I have just been witness of real life boy being stripped from his manliness as he grows old. The movie starts incredibly well, featuring the early stages of both a boy and a girl and all the subtle details that makes the difference betweenI have just been witness of real life boy being stripped from his manliness as he grows old. The movie starts incredibly well, featuring the early stages of both a boy and a girl and all the subtle details that makes the difference between genders. The parents going through real relationship problems. The mother being amorous and caring and the father taking them out of their comfort zones and being active.
Everything is awesome until the boy turns 15. His 15th birthday is one of the most amazing birthdays any man could have. He is given a shotgun for god sakes! From there the movie takes a 360 degree turn and becomes more of a series of propaganda scenes. The acting performance of the boy suddenly felt ungenuine. The boy is not the only one taken his manhood from. Suddenly every single male character becomes a confused wuss and is starts being reflected in the women around their lives. I just could not take it any more when I saw his sweet mother in tears of desperation. People around me laugh as the poor woman screamed for something to hold on to life.… Expand

7 of 37 users found this helpful730

All this user's reviews

6

AffableParadoxSep 2, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There were some really beautiful and insightful moments in Boyhood...very brief moments...book ended by hours of mind-numbing nothingness. Unfortunately, overall, it feels like Linklater turned out the equivalent of breaking out some dusty photo albums and showing them to strangers who don't have much in the way of contextual background. The characters are generally have no depth and aren't particularly like-able.

It was a neat project. I applaud the effort and the idea. It really just doesn't work as far as making a great film. It was good...or it was better than OK, and the novelty added a bit more spice to the otherwise bland movie. The critics are going to LOVE this movie!

I love the idea of the movie. I even love the moments that took me back to relive some of my own childhood. It just felt like it belonged in an extended (and probably very boring) Lifetime Network television series instead of crammed into a movie that was more than just a little disjointed.

I read somewhere (I wish I could quote where) that Linklater really avoided cliches with this movie. He was either lying to the author of the article or himself. His main character, Mason, Jr., ended up becoming the Indie movie darling stereotype...Brooding, disaffected, artist, loner, philosopher...who somehow scored a Photography scholarship to college after giving every indication he might fail out of school due to apathy...poof...movie magic...Ugh.

The fact that this is fiction and not a documentary following a real family for 12 years makes it even more frustrating...Where is the story? Where is the character development?… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

6

PfenderStrat621Mar 15, 2015

As a movie i enjoy it, but as a Richard Linklater movie it was really disappointing and i think it doesn't live up for the praise the critics has given to it (although i think they were paid off). I still thought it was a good movie thatAs a movie i enjoy it, but as a Richard Linklater movie it was really disappointing and i think it doesn't live up for the praise the critics has given to it (although i think they were paid off). I still thought it was a good movie that require some effort and i appreciate that. I like it as a journey of growing up with some relatable things and nostalgic events, but other than that it was EXTREMELY FLAWED. A lot of things that happened through the first half and second half were really underdeveloped and If you think about it, it doesn't make sense and you end up seeing it as a mess. The screenplay was good but some parts of it were really forced and written in a poor and unfocused way just to give sense to the scenes. I was expecting the script to be as amazing as the one in the "Before trilogy" (directed by Linklater), but it wasn't that good. If the screenplay was like "Before Sunset" the movie would be an epic masterpiece, but sadly it wasn't. It is really sad, because in both movies (Boyhood and Before Sunset) there is a huge dependence on the script and that's because it doesn't happen that much on the story of both films. Before Sunset worked really great but Boyhood not so much. I was entertained by it and it's concept was interesting, but it is difficult for me to see it as one of the best movies of 2014.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

hugoactiviaFeb 23, 2015

Interesting project, great directing and editing, characters interacted very naturally, however, It seemed more like a 12-year long home video. Very dull at some times.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

6

Matticuss77Jun 19, 2019

Boyhood is basically a good movie, and it was made in a way that, miraculously, ended up working. But ultimately, I have to pose the question of whether or not the story presented here will hold up next to timeless classics like TheBoyhood is basically a good movie, and it was made in a way that, miraculously, ended up working. But ultimately, I have to pose the question of whether or not the story presented here will hold up next to timeless classics like The Godfather, and I don't think it will. Great on a technical level and definitely worth one watch, at least, the film ultimately succumbs to pretentious posturing. Not for me.… Expand

1 of 15 users found this helpful114

All this user's reviews

10

bleedsblue96Jan 4, 2015

People who call this movie boring need to learn that not all movies are supposed to appeal to the viewer through action, sex, or second rate space travel with love and emotions. This is one of the realist movies since Shawshank RedemptionPeople who call this movie boring need to learn that not all movies are supposed to appeal to the viewer through action, sex, or second rate space travel with love and emotions. This is one of the realist movies since Shawshank Redemption that I can deem perfect. It captures the life and world around Mason along with him, as he grows he is constantly changing, adapting, molding into the person he thinks and might finally believe he wants to be. Not to mention being accepted, before the final act hurting him deeply and causing him to question what he really is, before realizing that in life, you not only seize a perfect moment, but it seizes you.… Expand

2 of 33 users found this helpful231

All this user's reviews

6

RewriteJan 9, 2015

Wow -- what a major disappointment!
I knew going in that this movie would have a hard time living up to it's reputation (universal acclaim), but it didn't even come close.
The idea is fantastic, but the execution wasn't. Some of the actingWow -- what a major disappointment!
I knew going in that this movie would have a hard time living up to it's reputation (universal acclaim), but it didn't even come close.
The idea is fantastic, but the execution wasn't. Some of the acting was mediocre at best, especially the sister (who it turns out is the director's daughter). [Note to directors: Ad-lib dialogue is really challenging, and if is not done right it's pretty terrible].
The story line left a lot to be desired - it didn't feel natural.
This was a great idea that could have been so much more, but one cool concept can't carry a movie.
It's still worth seeing, just don't expect the movie of the year or anything close.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

rodsAug 31, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I will be very disappointed if this film wins the best picture academy award... it was a real downer for me... o.k.... but, not at all what I was hoping for... in fact, I was rooting for the girl who dumped he main character when she did.... and hated the mescaline induced ending...… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

AtariBabyNov 16, 2014

It's an interesting movie with a clever gimmick that I won't give away, but that wasn't enough for me. The movie has fascinating characters and performances, but it lacks too many key elements I want in a film, including pacing. It plays likeIt's an interesting movie with a clever gimmick that I won't give away, but that wasn't enough for me. The movie has fascinating characters and performances, but it lacks too many key elements I want in a film, including pacing. It plays like it was heavily improvised and the best bits were kept in. And it's LONNNNG. I don't share the obvious love that most people felt with this film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

oDjentoJan 27, 2015

This definitely is film history and one people should watch. It may not be the most exciting film to watch, or the most interesting, but as i found with the film Inside Llyewn Davis it is a nice and pleasant viewing experience. And that'sThis definitely is film history and one people should watch. It may not be the most exciting film to watch, or the most interesting, but as i found with the film Inside Llyewn Davis it is a nice and pleasant viewing experience. And that's what this film is: an experience. The 12 years of filming works meticulously well and really helps develop the characters as real people. The film is about growing up, and the reason the message and work comes across so well is because that's literally what happens: they grow up. Other films that try this with different actors don't really work and you find them a little too boring or sentimental, but this film works with the growing up mechanic so well that you can really relate to the film even if you don't follow a life like the one portrayed in the film. I must say the acting is pretty solid pretty much from the get go, but the character Sam i found a little bit obvious as not being a real person. However, all the other actora felt genuine, and that's why i felt i connected with this film. A must watch.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

JKN145Feb 10, 2015

I personally think Boyhood is an amazing film. The performances were so lifelike, and the characters were so heartbreakingly real. However, your enjoyment of this very distinctive film really hinges on your personal tastes in cinema. If youI personally think Boyhood is an amazing film. The performances were so lifelike, and the characters were so heartbreakingly real. However, your enjoyment of this very distinctive film really hinges on your personal tastes in cinema. If you can appreciate quiet, intimate, introspective character studies, like 'Lost in Translation,' 'The Kids Are All Right,' or Linklater's own 'Before' trilogy, then you'll probably find a lot to love in 'Boyhood.' If those kinds of movies aren't your cup of tea, then likely neither will this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

ydnar4Jan 23, 2015

Its nice to see that movies can still be critically acclaimed by the media and still be enjoyed by the general public. Boyhood is a movie that can be enjoyed by the whole family. It had to believe that a project like this could be pulled offIts nice to see that movies can still be critically acclaimed by the media and still be enjoyed by the general public. Boyhood is a movie that can be enjoyed by the whole family. It had to believe that a project like this could be pulled off over 12 years. Ellar Coltrane was great throughout this movie. It would be neat if this movie is the only thing he does. He really shows what its like to be a growing male. I found many aspects of his life that we similar to events in my own life. Ethan Hawke was great also as the father. I'm going to say that this is the best thing he's ever done. Ethan Hawke is a bad that you wish everyone had. Richard Linklater has pulled off a movie that has captured a point in time and although it may not be relevant forever it will be one of the most significant movies of this period of time. Linklater even did so while casting his own daughter with little experience in one of the lead roles. I would be 100% happy with Boyhood winning best picture this year and I wouldn't be shocked if it does.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

borderlinefilmsFeb 4, 2015

Phenomenal

When you think back to Slackers you remember how easy that movie flowed. How comfortably it drifted. Just go with it. Let it happen, live in the moment. Then there's the Before trilogy which again seemed effortless andPhenomenal

When you think back to Slackers you remember how easy that movie flowed. How comfortably it drifted. Just go with it. Let it happen, live in the moment. Then there's the Before trilogy which again seemed effortless and free-flowing yet constructed with so much care that you knew this filmmaker was not only unusual, but acutely human. That he cherished experience and learning and submitted to the eternal present, surrendering to and tinkering with fate, while tending to the perpetually immediate situation with enormous sensitivity and regard.

But nothing could prepare you for Boyhood. You can't overstate the fact that it's a grand free-flowing time-lapse experiment and that most of the actors--no not actors, not performers--most of the people were cast when the central figure was a very young boy, looking up at the sky, having no idea how his future would unfold. The world might be a stage but Richard Linkater is not omnipotent. As a definitive work-in-progress, a daring collaboration with fate and destiny, who could really know how the boy's script was going to turn out, and how the wide array of voices in his life would shape him as he stumbles toward adulthood? Only a true sure-footed and fluid filmmaker, an authentic disarming innovator could raise this baby with as much beauty and wisdom. Dazed and Confused? Make room for Clear and Composed.

Hear the lamb howl. Boyhood is a daring experimental wolf wrapped in conventional wool. Needing to be shot chronologically, the linear time-line and 12-year shooting schedule called for a fresh and original approach to crafting a movie. If something went wrong during the many long gaps in production, say, if an actor suddenly became unavailable, or some drastic circumstance threatened to break the continuity of the boy and his family's life, there's no going back to re-shoot. No relying on special effects make-up or casting young and old versions of a character. The faith invested in this concept and the delicate handling of it's execution is a marvel to witness, blooming before our eyes.

Patricia Arquette was growing up too. Aging faster than Ellar Coltrane, it appeared. This movie defies breaking up into a series of disjointed, episodic fragments. And Arquette stitches together an admirable and dedicated performance as the ubiquitous maternal defender who struggles to keep herself and her family from falling apart. Because of the blur between fiction and reality, between drama and documentary, and because of the way Linklater is able to nurture the process and allow his films to take on a life of their own, Arquette may not be acting on set any more than she has to in real life. A slight adjustment in perspective and this movie could have been called Motherhood.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

RipperskiteJan 5, 2015

Coincido con muchas de las otras criticas, me parece muy bien que se rodara en 12 años, pero la película en si es lenta y aburrida. Es interesante ver a los mismos personajes creciendo, pero no tiene sentido. Simplemente una vida. UnCoincido con muchas de las otras criticas, me parece muy bien que se rodara en 12 años, pero la película en si es lenta y aburrida. Es interesante ver a los mismos personajes creciendo, pero no tiene sentido. Simplemente una vida. Un principio, y no nos cuentan el final.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

downwithdragonsSep 10, 2014

Eh. That's really all I can say. There was nothing offensive or particularly wrong with this movie and there were many things to admire (not the least of which is the dedication of everyone involved for 12 years!), but I left underwhelmed. IEh. That's really all I can say. There was nothing offensive or particularly wrong with this movie and there were many things to admire (not the least of which is the dedication of everyone involved for 12 years!), but I left underwhelmed. I thought Ethan Hawke and Patricia Arquette were outstanding. The "boy" was actually pretty uninteresting. I certainly wouldn't recommend people not see it if they're intrigued, but I might temper their expectations. My expectations were so high and perhaps that was the issue.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

MrSaturn21Sep 15, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The movie is definitely different than any other movie that you've seen. Does that mean it's good? Not for me. I love Richard Linklater and Ethan Hawke too. Before Sunrise, and the sequels were great. A Scanner Darkly, School of Rock, are great. This movie falls short, in my appraisal.

The movie chronicles the adolescence of a young boy named Mason. He faces a lot of things. His parents are divorced, and they argue a lot. There is a countless array of bad step-fathers that are abusive. He falls in love and deals with a breakup.

My problem with the movie is that Mason doesn't evolve. Throughout the movie he seems to stay his lazy slacker self, regardless of how many people tell him he's got to shape up. The movie ends with Mason walking through Texas with a group of new friends, including an attractive young college student who gives him flirty eyes and conversation when she onscreen. They sit on the site of a mountain and the girl tells him her ideas about how time (the day) isn't something to be seized, but something that seizes you.

While that message may be something that is quite profound, it tastes sour when told by someone so young with so little experience. Mason quickly agrees with her (of course he does) and they just sit there. I don't know why it bothers me so much. Maybe it's Mason's scruffy demeanor. I'm just sort of tired of teenagers who like to wax intellectually about time and the human condition as if they are Nietzsche. I'm of the Louis C.K. way of thinking when it comes to acclimation of wisdom. Wisdom is gained through experiences, through decades of observation and thought. Mason hasn't really transformed as a character at all. He hasn't really gone through anything that changes him, he hasn't come to any sort of realization about him or his life. He's kinda just floating through his life.

Maybe this movie wasn't made for me. Maybe it was made for people Mason's age who can relate to him. Maybe the movie was made for people who are a product of divorce. Maybe it was meant for parents who wonder what it might be like to grow up at the turn of the century who want to compare it to their own childhoods.

I didn't really get anything out of the movie. It wasn't for me. I still look forward to Richard Linklater's work. Maybe next time he'll catch my inspiration.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

pesho_oneFeb 20, 2015

I can see some appeal it this movie, but I think it depends on how you are going to relate to it or if you are even in the right mood to observe+relate rather than just being entertained. I don't care much about the 12 years of real timeI can see some appeal it this movie, but I think it depends on how you are going to relate to it or if you are even in the right mood to observe+relate rather than just being entertained. I don't care much about the 12 years of real time either, because it only added so much in the overall experience. I would prefer more focused and interesting story-line instead.
That being said, it is hard to predict how every other spectator would precept it and from what angle. But one thing, I am quite certain of, is that it dragged too much for what could be much shorted and more eventful tale. The ending was kind of charming though.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

dfelesinaMar 2, 2015

Just because something took 12 years to film doesn't mean it will be good or original. Put the same story in film that was made in about a month, and it would be average. That doesn't make it terrible, but it is decent to say the least.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

longjetty7Apr 2, 2015

An absolutely incredible film, and probably one of my favorites ever. This is cinematic realism at its absolute finest. Everything about it, the characters, their conversations, and their mundane everyday experiences are captured in a wayAn absolutely incredible film, and probably one of my favorites ever. This is cinematic realism at its absolute finest. Everything about it, the characters, their conversations, and their mundane everyday experiences are captured in a way that mimics real life like no other film I've ever seen, not to mention watching the characters literally grow up before your eyes is surreal and deeply fascinating. This movie is basically just a bunch of scenes documenting this kid's life, some of which will make you laugh, make you sad, make you nostalgic, make you hopeful, etc. There really is no overarching plot, but nonetheless, I feel like I could have sat through another 3 hours of this movie! The acting is also some of the most natural and effortless I've ever seen. The characters seem strangely familiar in everything they say and do, which I suppose is the point. Overall, Boyhood leaves you feeling satisfied and somewhat in awe at how incredible our lives are once you put things into perspective.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

vy7478Jan 22, 2015

Truly amazing movie. It really reflects my life and the more you think about it the deeper the movie gets. Definitely a masterpiece by Linklater. If you think this movie is boring then you really don't know how to enjoy one.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

GameExplorerFeb 2, 2015

A boy that love woman in swimwear. Here you can learn how to get your girlfriend. If you like teen movies than this one is for you... The name of movie may not be so interesting....

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Arthur_S_PoeFeb 11, 2015

An absolute must-see, Linklater's 'Boyhood' is a unique movie in every aspect. It offers a lot to the viewer, but it also demands quite an effort to be fully comprehended. Full of a variety of cultural references and a very specific zeitgeistAn absolute must-see, Linklater's 'Boyhood' is a unique movie in every aspect. It offers a lot to the viewer, but it also demands quite an effort to be fully comprehended. Full of a variety of cultural references and a very specific zeitgeist atmosphere, this movie is a profound and aesthetically perfect epic dedicated to life itself.

Linklater's hyperrealism is something that contributes to the magic of the film itself. It is not a movie, it is a story about a boy, his development inside the boiling cauldron we all call life, his struggles, both external and internal and, ultimately, his victory over life itself as MJ comes out stronger and more mature. You never actually perceive it to be a movie, rather a story of a boy you're witnessing first hand, either as a direct participant or a third-person observer, but always within the story itself, never distancing yourself back to the sofa or seat you're actually in. All the actors are brilliantly adapted to their roles, never over-acting or showing signs of egoistical vanity, dedicated to both the idea of the film itself and the story of Mason Evans, Jr., the main protagonist of the film itself.

Finally, the aesthetics of the film is stunning. The technical details, a well-made choice of scenery and moment, the authentic presentation of a human emotion that just flows through you via the screen like you're actually there and captures you fully, forcing you to relieve that same emotion, via nostalgia or anything else, within yourself - all of that and much more contributes to that specific aesthetic moment that is 'Boyhood'. Because, it really is just a moment, a moment of 12 years compressed into three hours, but so rich and fantastic that it is much more than just a cinematic experience, much more than just a movie.

'Boyhood' is an absolute master-piece, a work of art in every sense of the work, elevating the often pompous and overly self-worthy genre of art films and elevating the cinematic experience as a whole. A story that must be seen, carefully, remembered and loved. It reached the status of a classic immediately, surely to be remembered in history and is, certainly, one of the best movies ever made and one of the best stories ever told.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

FelicityFenwickAug 19, 2018

Simply an overrate film that seems to have gotten a TON of love from the critics simply because of how long it took to make it. Stunt cinema. For the most part, I was non-plused.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

flylexMay 22, 2017

The director's biggest play, Richard Linklater, was 12 to finalize the film. Focused on the character named Mason from his sixteen-eighteenth year, the great difference of the film is to see the actors poisoning naturally during the yearsThe director's biggest play, Richard Linklater, was 12 to finalize the film. Focused on the character named Mason from his sixteen-eighteenth year, the great difference of the film is to see the actors poisoning naturally during the years that pass by. Very gratifying to see the evolution of each character during the lapéis of time this makes the movie true, alive. The mother of the mason played by Patricia Arquette does a great job with the evolution and the physical and mental disengagement of the character in the beginning for example she wants To do college, then to be a teacher. The father of the mason played by Ethan Hawke is incredible. The maturation of the character is evident during the years. As the film portrays small moments in the life of Mason it is impossible not to become familiar with at least one of them new school, First love, domestic abuse, alcohol, drugs, etc, this makes the film an incredible experience the cuts are perfect, the sequences plans are very good and the story n It does not become tiring at any time what is quite rare in a movie lasting 130 minutes. The film has an incredibly well-written screenplay that is due to the actors who make the film look like a real and familiar experience. Ends in the second certain. In general it is a film that took years of production and a lot of effort involved and this generated some of the best cinematic experiences.note 100… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

Jaredc324May 16, 2019

A transcendent film achievement. Shot and captured over the course of 12 years, Richard Linklater focusses in on the moments of truth and perspective rather than the obvious footnotes in ones childhood experience. It results in a veryA transcendent film achievement. Shot and captured over the course of 12 years, Richard Linklater focusses in on the moments of truth and perspective rather than the obvious footnotes in ones childhood experience. It results in a very effective and enriching film experience as if following the life Mason rather than the highlights of Mason. Being the same age as this kid it truly resonated with me at a level I cannot describe, and needed some time after viewing the experience to reflect and ponder myself. Because that's what the movie strives for. Moments of reflection, perspective and seeking truth on the journey of life, but never giving us the answers. Boyhood is what most coming of age films strives to be.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

auburnnJan 19, 2018

This film took 12 years to complete. On the one hand, it elevates the medium of film to equivalent of fine art, faithfully documents every moment repeatedly within a long period of time. On the other hand, it explores how we can use movies toThis film took 12 years to complete. On the one hand, it elevates the medium of film to equivalent of fine art, faithfully documents every moment repeatedly within a long period of time. On the other hand, it explores how we can use movies to translate biography -- in the end, every single life is capsulized in a story. What fine art requires is accuracy and rawness without selectivity; what literature requires is a consistent narrative. That seems to be a paradox, but Boyhood achieves a great balance between the two.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

goncalocoutoOct 20, 2018

"Boyhood" é um filme perfeito e sem falhas. O melhor de 2014, sem dúvida.
10/10

0 of 23 users found this helpful023

All this user's reviews

7

UncleWillardMar 12, 2019

Hell of an achievement. 12 years in the making. The cast literally grew up on the screen. And yet it plods at points. It's an American family drama that just reeks of mediocrity. Not the acting or the film making, but the story itself. EvenHell of an achievement. 12 years in the making. The cast literally grew up on the screen. And yet it plods at points. It's an American family drama that just reeks of mediocrity. Not the acting or the film making, but the story itself. Even after 12 years, the main character is still on the cusp of his life. Maybe a little more indication of where he goes from there would have helped? Still, an outstanding film.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful07

All this user's reviews

6

clem666May 5, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I'll make things clear from the beginning: I enjoyed 'Boyhood' way more than six out of ten. It has some honestly touching and moving scenes, moments and evolutions. Empathy for the characters is sometimes effortless, sometimes really hard considering some of their choices. 'Boyhood' appear to be in many ways the story of a regular boy (and by extension his ever-changing family) living in America. This movie has no other pretention than to show daily routines and the lukewarmness of reality and it successfully manages to do so.

This film features ordinary characters dealing with real life issues such as financial problems, (multiple) separations and divorces, growing up and aging, changing careers, witnessing domestic violence, forging an identity, etc. Acting is poor in overall (excepted for Ethan Hawke obviously) which contributes to make almost all characters look like normal people. Anyway, we have to admit that Richard Linklater made a risky bet on this film and really put all the chances on his side. It's a pity that he had to fall into the trap of conventions far too often and especially by making terrifying adults by their stereotyped characters.

With this particular artistic and conceptual approach of filming for 12 years, we have a finished product with no particular plot and that suffers from spasms making it even harder to understand the red line throughout. Too many scenes appear to be anecdotic or meaningless.

The beginning isn't a true beginning, the end surely not an end. 'Boyhood' is way more like a documentary about daily life in this first quarter of 21st century than an actual movie.… Expand

0 of 13 users found this helpful013

All this user's reviews

10

TootsieWootsyAug 29, 2019

Linklater has given us many amazing cinematic experiences, but this is his masterpiece. Not only is this film a heartbreakingly honest portrayal of growing up, but it should be mandatory for students to watch before graduating from highLinklater has given us many amazing cinematic experiences, but this is his masterpiece. Not only is this film a heartbreakingly honest portrayal of growing up, but it should be mandatory for students to watch before graduating from high schoool. Even two years after its release, my eyes still water every time I think about this film. Hawke delivers one of his finest performances, but Arquette's raw emotion will steal your heart and connect with every person who understands what single-parenting feels like. In her last scene of the film, Arquette delivers a heartbreaking line that will break the heart of every mother (and father) who has raised a child to adulthood. This film will go down as one of the greatest cinematic experiences to ever come out of Hollywood… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

9

LolathonMar 26, 2022

Very unique slice of life movie. Being from Kazakhstan, I kinda got the grasp of average American life.

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

10

freerideartsMar 4, 2021

This is a great film. This is a great film. This is a great film. This is a great film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

TokyochuchuDec 26, 2015

Boyhood is an absolute masterpiece and probably the best movie of it's type ever made. The acting is excellent across the board and the writing matches the performances. There isn't much in the way of 'plot' per se, but somehow the film justBoyhood is an absolute masterpiece and probably the best movie of it's type ever made. The acting is excellent across the board and the writing matches the performances. There isn't much in the way of 'plot' per se, but somehow the film just works with the daily grind compulsively pulling you in. Boyhood is a joy to watch and a really emotional ride. It's a perfect slice of movie making.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

NedRyerson1Jan 29, 2015

Boyhood is definitely a movie you cannot miss, not because is the best movie of the year or something like that (is not even close), but it is an experiment, a new way of doing things in cinema. The key is that it's a more contemplative kind,Boyhood is definitely a movie you cannot miss, not because is the best movie of the year or something like that (is not even close), but it is an experiment, a new way of doing things in cinema. The key is that it's a more contemplative kind, similar to a documentary, there is nothing to reflect. Richard Linklater brings this film and tells everyone, this is life. The level of reality that reach the story is shocking, takes the viewer to his own childhood, having two characters to identify with, Mason for men and Samantha for women; and for parents there is Olivia and Mason Sr., make your choice. Maybe not with the best plot, not clever script and simple performances (except for Patricia Arquette, who is absolutely breathtaking), but hey that's how it's life. What is surely a success is the song Hero, fits perfect with the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SpangleFeb 21, 2015

If you asked me to name one movie similar to Boyhood, I simply could not think of something. Sure, many of the events here have been depicted before and the whole coming of age thing has been done to death, but man, it has never been doneIf you asked me to name one movie similar to Boyhood, I simply could not think of something. Sure, many of the events here have been depicted before and the whole coming of age thing has been done to death, but man, it has never been done like this before. Sporting a killer soundtrack to guide us as we trek through Mason Jr's formative years, Boyhood is a slice of life film like never before. Things happen for no reason, things come and go, and things fall apart out of thin air, just like real life. This film is extraordinary for many reasons, one of which has to be the way it was filmed. You do not see films made over the course of 12 years and to see this only helps it be all more powerful. As we grow up with the actors throughout the film, you truly feel like you are almost watching a documentary on these people's lives, which is an incredible feeling .In addition, it just felt unique and was amazing to watch unfold. In addition, it does not try to create drama. Life is not perfect and things happen randomly, people drift off for no reason at all and you have no idea why and you never see them again. This film is exactly like that and makes no attempts to "Hollywood" things up by tying up all the loose ends, instead it leaves them as is. Plus, one cannot forget that this isn't their whole story; this is only a 12 year period in their lives. Who knows where their stories will end up? The writing is incredible, as is the direction from Richard Linklater, who is a true visionary and has undoubtedly created his magnum opus with this project. The acting from Ellar Coltrane, Patrica Arquette, Ethan Hawke, and the only cast, is incredible. The chemistry and familiar relationships felt so real and authentic. The situations rang true and ultimately made this one feel as though the most authentic coming of age film I have ever seen. There were no one dimensional characters and everyone had a story to tell, just like in real life.

Above all though, I have to say one of the best parts of this film has to be the quotes, in particular one that stood out to me, "I thought there'd be more." Just impeccable writing that manages to sum up what it is to be at that point so well, although I personally have not gotten there, I can sympathize with that line and its meaning. Ultimately, Boyhood deserves the accolades bestowed upon it and is one of the best films of 2014 and will undoubtedly be hailed as a film for the ages. Wow.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Compi24May 6, 2018

In what is perhaps Richard Linklater's loftiest feature film feat to date, "Boyhood" not only represents a watershed moment in the on-going history of modern American filmmaking, but an enjoyable experience overall, chockfull of simple, yetIn what is perhaps Richard Linklater's loftiest feature film feat to date, "Boyhood" not only represents a watershed moment in the on-going history of modern American filmmaking, but an enjoyable experience overall, chockfull of simple, yet captivating storytelling tactics, some terrific acting, and an immeasurable amount of thematic insight. The film's length is a bit unwieldy at times, but it also really helps drive home the epic weight of what's been accomplished here, and -- indeed -- the majesty of life itself. Life is far from perfect. In fact, much of life includes suffering, hardship, undue change, and an endless study of "what might have been." But if I'm hearing the movie's message right, it's important to take all of that in stride and to focus more on the present moment, keeping hopeful for what might be in store for us all down the pike.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

etoppApr 8, 2023

While an interesting experiment (similar to the "7 Up" series), this film is unsuccessful in telling an engrossing story. Does the viewer really care how this kid is going to turn out?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

ThatCooperGuyJul 1, 2015

In development for 10 years and somehow, Boyhood is great. It's rare to have a movie that doesn't have any problems with it. It's just a perfect movie, done in such an authentic way too.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

googolendtimesJun 21, 2015

Its almost three-hour runtime, somewhat meandering pace and lack of action demands tenacity. But for the cinephile and the patient viewer, "Boyhood" provides a unique viewing experience of singular ambition and veracity and captures theIts almost three-hour runtime, somewhat meandering pace and lack of action demands tenacity. But for the cinephile and the patient viewer, "Boyhood" provides a unique viewing experience of singular ambition and veracity and captures the minutiae of adolescence in the 21st century with searing intimacy and an expansive scope. It is, of course, this focus on the mundane that has divided audiences far more than it has divided critics. But "Boyhood" is, at heart, nothing more or less than what it sets out to be: an authentic exploration of growing up. And it accomplishes that with exceptional clarity and honesty. It feels like we viewed it from a young boy's perspective, not the adults behind the camera. As such, there is no defining moment within the film that makes it stand out: the reality of the twelve years it covers on-screen is its defining moment. Shot by shot, it is far from unforgettable but as a whole, it is definitely memorable. At heart, "Boyhood" is an extraordinary way of telling quite an ordinary story. I can't put it any better than that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CaesaroctopusMay 2, 2015

Boyhood possesses an interesting central concept, but is bogged down somewhat by its reliance upon nostalgic elements of childhood and by the simplicity of its central character who seems more like a vessel to recite platitudes than a trueBoyhood possesses an interesting central concept, but is bogged down somewhat by its reliance upon nostalgic elements of childhood and by the simplicity of its central character who seems more like a vessel to recite platitudes than a true individual. Despite this, I am glad to have seen Boyhood. It is a touching movie with outstanding acting, even if it is not the seminal film event that it has been heralded as.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

Boyhood

User Reviews