Blood Work
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: August 9, 2002
8.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 79 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
56
Mixed:
18
Negative:
5
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
2
Hi.I'mGilbertMulroneycakesAndI'llBeYourWDec 31, 2002
Tell-tale sign 1: it's only just this second come out in the cinema in this country (Britain, that is)...and it's already out on video in the America. Oh dear. Tell-tale sign sign 2: it's ChristmasNew Year this second...making Tell-tale sign 1: it's only just this second come out in the cinema in this country (Britain, that is)...and it's already out on video in the America. Oh dear. Tell-tale sign sign 2: it's ChristmasNew Year this second...making it easier to bury the film in the theatres. Oh dear. Tell-tale sign 3: it has Clinton of the Eastwood as a romantic lead at the age of about 97. A case of the Woody Allens, I feel. Oh dear. And Clint (Actually a very good director, viz Unforgiven, Madison County and, I believe, Play Misty For Me, though I could be wrong, and if I am, I'm sure Ed the Great will correct me about...now) doesn't even do a good job behind the camera either. Not a very good film? No, not really.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SamAug 25, 2005
I liked this movie, it just doesn't have the fantastic quality I came to expect from Clint Eastwood. Good acting, good twists, but there's something missing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
[Anonymous]Sep 5, 2005
Your typical, decent thriller. Eastwood is at his usual greatness, but sometimes the thriller feels unengaging.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LuisL.Apr 16, 2006
blood work is a masterpiece.clint eastwood, jeff daniels, angelica huston are suberb. blood work is one of the best films of all times.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
Compi24Nov 9, 2020
For the life of me, I can't help but be constantly entertained by Clint Eastwood, regardless of whether or not the film he's in severely lacks efficacy, energy or the occasional bout of grace. "Blood Work" never even comes close to borderingFor the life of me, I can't help but be constantly entertained by Clint Eastwood, regardless of whether or not the film he's in severely lacks efficacy, energy or the occasional bout of grace. "Blood Work" never even comes close to bordering into the "bad" territory of the Eastwood oeuvre, but there are some glaring issues, namely the clunkiness of the narrative, which constantly stumbles over its own feet in its efforts to "be cool" with some of the plot's more sensitive elements. Whether it's with certain telling camera movements or even the way a particular word is annunciated in a line of dialogue, you definitely get the feeling that the movie thinks it's not signaling the importance of something in the plot. Though, it totally is and you're well the hell aware of it. Clint Eastwood, however, tugs this sucker along at a decent clip, what with his innate charm and charisma. And the narrative, while imperfect, contains enough momentum and intrigue to keep the audience at bay for most of the running time. Again, it's not even going to crack the top 20 Clint Eastwood movies for me, but it's mostly competently done.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
RayzorMooseNov 12, 2013
Blood Work bleeds with discomfort.
A very interesting concept that doesn't unlock much depth. Eastwood directs and acts in this somewhat ironic train wreck that would otherwise be successful if not contaminated with poor lines and anBlood Work bleeds with discomfort.
A very interesting concept that doesn't unlock much depth. Eastwood directs and acts in this somewhat ironic train wreck that would otherwise be successful if not contaminated with poor lines and an underhanded script that feels copy and pasted together.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
lunanulJun 15, 2016
Has a lot going for it: intriguing premise, actors that are normally good (but wasted here), etc. That's where the goodness ends, however. A laugh-out-loud-bad stinker of a movie in which *you* know what Eastwood's next "discovery" will be inHas a lot going for it: intriguing premise, actors that are normally good (but wasted here), etc. That's where the goodness ends, however. A laugh-out-loud-bad stinker of a movie in which *you* know what Eastwood's next "discovery" will be in the murder case a long time before does, and every potentially powerful scene is undermined by coarse acting, bad script and cheesy music. To be avoided.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
FilipeNetoNov 25, 2018
I never knew the work of Clint Eastwood very well, neither as an actor nor as a director. I've seen some movies directed or starred by him, but he's usually one of those actors/directors that I've never paid attention to. It's a mistake, II never knew the work of Clint Eastwood very well, neither as an actor nor as a director. I've seen some movies directed or starred by him, but he's usually one of those actors/directors that I've never paid attention to. It's a mistake, I know, and I am willing to correct that. He's one of those people who know cinema with an intimacy and proximity reserved for very few and it was with great pleasure that I watched him in this film, where he accumulates the functions of director and protagonist.

The story is simple, but it works quite well: a retired police officer, who received the heart of a murdered donor, is invited by the donor's sister to investigate the crime. However, he quickly realizes that her death is linked to a serial killer he was trying to arrest when he fell ill. Of course, there are some details that I found unrealistic, such as the simple fact that a family member of an organ donor is able to identify, by chance, one of the patients who received those organs. I cannot imagine this happening in real life. But if you decide to ignore these details, the plot works and creates an effective and elegant thriller. There are good action scenes, but they are punctual and may not satisfy the appetite of those who seek it.

Clint Eastwood showed remarkable agility, given his age and even anticipating, as is often the case, the use of stunts. And besides, he adapted perfectly to the character and to what he asked of him as an actor. Jeff Daniels also deserves congratulations. He has a character that begins by looking totally insignificant, but ultimately proving to be important. I don't want to say what's going to happen, I'll just recommend you to keep an eye out for the way he talks and behaves. Wanda de Jesus fulfilled what was asked of her, and gave the film a romantic and feminine touch.

Ultimately, this movie is worth for the good performance of the actors and the good plot. It is not the best movie of any of those involved, but it has value for what it is, allowing us an hour and a half of good entertainment.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
r96skFeb 7, 2022
Good entertainment.

I like the plot of 'Blood Work'. I'm unsure if it would hold up if you went through with a fine-tooth comb, but it certainly gave me the required enjoyment levels. Clint Eastwood gives a sturdy performance, as do JeffGood entertainment.

I like the plot of 'Blood Work'. I'm unsure if it would hold up if you went through with a fine-tooth comb, but it certainly gave me the required enjoyment levels. Clint Eastwood gives a sturdy performance, as do Jeff Daniels and Wanda De Jesus; elsewhere on the cast, neat to see Anjelica Huston and Rick Hoffman, Louis Litt himself, appear in smaller roles.

It's not as unpredictable as it perhaps thinks it is, due to the casting more than anything, but I had a fun enough time with it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Xlyophone199May 6, 2021
buguugughuihihhiihihhihugtdrsgfjgkjojohydrawarfyfytyfyfytyfyfyfygyfyfutugutugyttuggututuugguguytfyguyfgujjjjjjjk
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Depose570May 16, 2021
.,?!;:"^&*()%$#@+×÷=++€£--------~`|▪○●□■{}[]◇♧♡♤■☆⊙☆°•¤《》¡¿●●■■▪▪.......bhjbjjjdmdkdmskkx
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Embalmer98Jun 9, 2021
○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○●○○●
÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,÷,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,+,
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Pluto744Jun 21, 2021
●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●¡●
".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".".
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

64 Critic Reviews

8.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL