Blade Runner 2049

7

SkulbOct 29, 2017

It is not easy to pick up a movie like BR to try and make a sequel. Use the interminable Hollywood tropes that almost every movie uses these days and you'll lose the adult crowd. Slow it down, like BR 2049, and you lose the attention spanIt is not easy to pick up a movie like BR to try and make a sequel. Use the interminable Hollywood tropes that almost every movie uses these days and you'll lose the adult crowd. Slow it down, like BR 2049, and you lose the attention span deficit youth. Stay too close to the original and the sequel becomes redundant. Diverge too much and it alienates fans of the original.
And indeed BR 2049 manages to somehow fall into all of these traps of sequel-making. It ends up as a sort of stew of Hollywood tropes, like the inevitable female Terminator in this movie, and artsy scenography in lieu of world building. Low clouds, rain and plenty of top down shots get rid of the need for convincing visual detail of the sort found in the original. And that gives us plenty of time for intellectualist masturbation over contemporary politics in what was supposed to be a movie representation of Gogol's Dead Souls.
But thanks to the American invasion of the planet it is of course now impossible to talk about slavery without immediately ending up in a squabble over racism. But these are two completely separate issues, which you can spend the rest of your life without being able to explain to an American. And then you can't understand either Gogol or Blade Runner.
And I'm not sure if the people who wrote BR 2049 understand it either. Having said that though, this is a good movie. But it is a bit long and very quiet in places. I was tired when I came into the theater and really struggled staying awake in the middle of it. Luckily something exploded loudly just as I was dozing off and I was able to stay conscious for the ending. But there needs to be a reason for a movie to be close to three hours long. And I'm not sure if I see it. Some trimming in editing, some work on the script to make it coherent with the original and some careful chiseling of some of the more heavy handed characterizations would not have been time wasted. But it is what it is. But if I have to see one more unrealistic ninja woman with glasses in a movie I might just go live in a monastery.

One thing that annoys me terribly is that Decker could not have been alive after thirty years if he was a replicant. This is the key theme in BR, which hints very strongly that he is in fact a replicant. And if he isn't a replicant there should be little need for him to hide in BR 2049. It was obviously more important to give Ford his cameo though, and narrative cohesion be damned! Why can't the people writing the script at least be made to carefully watch and truly understand the movie they are rebooting. This crew did the same thing with Alien Covenant. Fortunately BR 2049 is a million times better than that disaster though. Good call to keep Ridley Scott as far away from this movie as humanly possible.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

seymoursgalOct 16, 2017

This is a well-made film. I really didn't like the first one, but I liked this. It was engrossing and visually stunning. And I like that's it's not just an action, action, action thing all the time. It has a story that's served well byThis is a well-made film. I really didn't like the first one, but I liked this. It was engrossing and visually stunning. And I like that's it's not just an action, action, action thing all the time. It has a story that's served well by slowing down at times. The female "bad guy" I thought could be quite over-the-top, but I liked all the other actors.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

TimW001Nov 1, 2017

A beautiful sci-fi movie and a fantastic addition to the genre. The movie has outstanding colour use and cinematography. Also is able to tell a complex story with twists. Without rubbing it in the audience's face we all get the story. TheA beautiful sci-fi movie and a fantastic addition to the genre. The movie has outstanding colour use and cinematography. Also is able to tell a complex story with twists. Without rubbing it in the audience's face we all get the story. The movie is also not afraid of the long shot with no interruptions. I recommend seeing this movie.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

poewilsonOct 30, 2017

The P.H. Metric 78.75/100

During my showing 7 people walked out, and there was only probably 15 of us, and they made it no more 50 minutes in. Several people I went to the theater with fell asleep, yet critically applauded and here comes theThe P.H. Metric 78.75/100

During my showing 7 people walked out, and there was only probably 15 of us, and they made it no more 50 minutes in. Several people I went to the theater with fell asleep, yet critically applauded and here comes the divide. Movies critics love, film does not make money even when they have huge investment and movies critics don’t love film makes enough money to fund 5-15 more movies. So in short this film is a disservice, because ultimately fewer studios are willing to take the risk on artsy films and all this film needed was to tighten up its pacing and it would have probably broken even and in terms of cinematic vision that is hardly selling your soul.

Directing: 8.75/10

The directing is superb and I am shocked with the level of investment that Villeneuve was given as much control as he was. Though it must be said that this film draws out shots for too long and this is from a man who loved the film Stalker. Where as something like Stalker is completely about the philosophical nature this film still tries to make it self an action/thriller/mystery film and these long takes end up killing the mystery and feels more like there is not enough story to go around, which ultimately is true. The shots themselves are lovely.

Acting: 7/10

Ford is Ford the man is not that great of an actor and he really is just cashing in on old franchises at this point. Gosling’s muted touch was decent enough and while Leto’s weird character was weird in a good way the character itself was unneeded. The main villain of the piece was over the top and worthy of being in a film that is trying so hard to be nuanced. She ends up coming off as a jarring screeching noise.

Cinematography: 10/10

Deakins’s cinematography shines, absolutely shines and this has to be his year. 13 noms and with Lubezki currently attached to a special award Oscar his major comp for the year is not there.

Editing 8.5/10

I feel bad for Joe Walker he kept the ship as tight as he could throughout, but ultimately due to the nature of these long drawn out takes that it feels like he was ultimately overruled when it came to where to cut the film.

Score/sound effects: 5.5/10

I would have scored this higher if I had not seen Arrival, where as the industrial style sound design should have been more engaging I could not help feeling they were reusing it from Arrival. Of course the sounds were meant to be jarring given all the silence we were fed, but ultimately it feels like that opening sequence in the remake of Funny Games, it is not shocking or jarring in the sense the creator wants, but more in the sense please turn down the TV those noises are starting to give me a headache.

Visual Effects: 9/10

I get a sense of Silent Hill (the first game) it feels like the fog and dust in certain scenes is there to hide rather than enhance and when one goes back to the original Blade Runner these modern effects (specifically shots of the city) do not look like the technology has really pushed the boundaries, in fact it looks more like the status quo, which mind you the status quo is excellent, but not genre defining.

Writing: 3/10

I am sad to find out there was a writer for this film. Now I previously mentioned Stalker which is similar in many regards, however the dialogue in that is profound, where is the dialogue in Blade Runner 2049 thinks it is. With such cliche android film lines as basically sacrificing yourself is the way to prove you are human. This concept never sits well with me, as apparently for an android the most human thing is to sacrifice yourself so that the human may continue to live a better life than you. That sounds like the kind of thing an android would be programmed to do. Asimov anybody? Everything just keeps pushing the fact that these androids want to be human, but ultimately it keeps slapping them down and saying they are not. It adds nothing to the greater debate over AI and ultimately when compared to the sheer quality of everything else in the film it looks out of place and useless, as if someone was brought in last minute to patch it up. Secondly the whole it could be him story was let out of the back to early on, so it made the double twist so predictable that it steals any power it had.

Production Design: 9.5/10

Those in production design you all need more respect and deserve to be pushed further into the foreground, because when you do an excellent job no one says anything, only look how well this and that is, but you owned this film.

Costume Design 9/10

Well done, especially Leto’s character, though I will say the only real negative was Wright’s outfit. What is this 2049 and she is channeling the 50’s or was she literally a copy of the police chief from Futurama. Also Ford’s was a little meh.

Make-up/Hairstyle 8.5/10

Again Leto is the high point, but not much else as everything is high quality, but nothing feels astounding.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

manuelgcgNov 19, 2017

First things first, this movie is not for everybody. Blade Runner 2049 has amazing sceneries, great CGI, fantastic practical effects and a world so well made that whilst watching the movie you just feel part of it. However the story its quiteFirst things first, this movie is not for everybody. Blade Runner 2049 has amazing sceneries, great CGI, fantastic practical effects and a world so well made that whilst watching the movie you just feel part of it. However the story its quite disappointing with an unnecessary length that could have been easily reduced by removing sections of the movie that added nothing more than beautiful scenarios.

Pros
+ Beautiful universe
+ Fantastic performance from Ana de Armas
+ Top notch CGI
+ Great use of practical effects
+ Stunning scenes with an incomparable immersion
+ Amazing soundtrack

Cons
- Unnecessary long
- Slow paced
- Weak Story
- Poor performances

This movie suffers the same negatives as the original Blade Runner, if you liked the first you must watch it.

If you are looking for a movie to admire its beauty and how well made it is, this movie is a 9/10

If you just want to watch a movie and just enjoy it and have a good time it is a 4-5/10

I am going to score it a 6/10 to balance these two.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

JyroJyroNov 10, 2017

An auditory & visual masterpiece that stays true to the original film whilst also feeling suitably futuristic and nuanced in a number of different ways. I did feel it was a little too ponderous at times, but this is still a seriouslyAn auditory & visual masterpiece that stays true to the original film whilst also feeling suitably futuristic and nuanced in a number of different ways. I did feel it was a little too ponderous at times, but this is still a seriously mesmerising sequel from Villeneuve.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

KaptenVideoDec 24, 2017

A young blade runner's (Ryan Gosling) discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down older colleague (Harrison Ford), who's been missing for thirty years. In the future, there are people whose job is to find and kill human-likeA young blade runner's (Ryan Gosling) discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down older colleague (Harrison Ford), who's been missing for thirty years. In the future, there are people whose job is to find and kill human-like robots, you know, and they are called blade runners.

Also appearing, Jared Leto, Robin Wright, Dave Bautista, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Mackenzie Davis, David Dastmalchian et al.

The original „Blade Runner“ (1982) is lauded as one of the best and most important sci-fi movies ever. I have seen it, of course, even more than once, and read the Philip K. Dick’s story it’s based on, but never see the appeal, honestly. Was quite bored with it, actually.

So why do they like it so much? I am too lazy to research it on the interweb, so I am just gonna take a wild guess and offer that when it came out, it was a long-waited antidote to all the silly sci-fi movies craze that had ruled in the previous five years.

You see, throughout history sci-fi was always a „serious“ and artsy cinema genre but then „Star Wars“ (1977) came out and made huge amount of people want something different entirely.

So „Blade Runner“ was, for sci-fi geeks, a long-awaited return to form, with its moodiness, sombre atmosphere and deep philosophical questions such as what makes us „real“ anyway, and is human life more important than artificially created one.

„Blade Runner“ flopped in cinemas originally but over the years it has built an admirable cult following. And the fans are surely glad to know that the long-planned sequel is finally here and stays far away from mainstream fare, respecting its „serious“ roots and everything.

Yes, the trailers look spectacular and have plenty of rip-roaring action but the new „Blade Runner“ is all about returning to the form, easily supassing the original movie in every aspect, at least for yours truly.

Be warned: not only does it last for close to three hours, it’s so artsy that you may feel the need to go grab some junk food later. Just to, you know, compensate.

The story is slow, not too eventful, a few action setpieces, not much dialogue – and the existing sounds more like monologue than real natural conversation between persons.

Filled with futuristic landscapes and environments, the movie looks gorgeous but there’s a noticeble discord between viewer and characters/events. The experience is cold and disheartening by design, always keeping you at arms length, so to speak.

It does have Ryan Gosling and Harrison Ford starring, but the result is far from perfect date movie… unless both are big movie lovers and/or loved the original „Blade Runner“.

You may also have trouble with understanding the backstory and certain things about the characters. It is even difficult to say whether everything is meant to feel so ambiguous, asking us to offer our own answers, or the makers have tried to remain as „artsy“ as possible. I think it’s meant to be that hard to grasp. It’s directed by Denis Villeneuve after all („Prisoners“, „Enemy“, „Sicario“, „Arrival“).

To be honest, the movie does not have any good reason to last for close to three hours, but at least it’s full of thoughtful and well-crafted material, not filler crap like many „event“ movies.

The main topics such as the future of artifical intellect and the value of life, especially human life versus the artificially created one, are intriguing if you are able to open up to the whole experience.

And if you manage to open up already, you may admire how spiritual this bleak and cold futuristic story can be at its core. I dug throught the symbolism evident in the story and found out that it is really about the importance of feelings – this is all you really have to get through life. Just what the spiritual systems have taught us for thousands of years.

There will be many who will feel turned offed by this approach, I am sure. For an expensive 150 million U.S. dollar movie, it sure tries its earnest not to be easily liked and digested.

But it’s gorgeous and after a while, you may notice that it really speaks to you. Some may dig the moodiness, or Gosling’s face, but there’s enough serious content beneath the surface.

For all it’s emotional distant-ness and terrifying length, „Blade Runner 2049“ is not my cup of tea, but I think it’s a noteworthy piece of modern art. Considering the hefty budget, it is also probably the most expensive piece of modern art ever made.

All in all, for what it is, the movie could not be better in any aspect. Except for maybe giving Leto a bigger role.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

PotaeSuprakitNov 19, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Blade Runner 2049 returns very few of the characters from the original film but they manage to breathe life into this movie through the new ones they created. Officer K isn't the most lively protagonist but he gets an eye-opening character arc that kept me involved. Deckard doesn't appear till later in the movie but he remains interesting and what they decide to do with him makes his appearance worthwhile. I also really liked some of the smaller supporting characters. Sapper really helps kick off the movie, what Joi represents is extremely emotional and Mariette is so mysterious that her involvement brings up more and more questions. Add in that Niander Wallace and Luv make for pretty menacing villains and you have a pretty well-rounded and fascinating script.

I don't think that the actors/actresses will be the focal point of the awards attention that this movie will get but that doesn't mean there aren't exemplary performances. Gosling is good as K, he's deliberately robotic and he accomplishes a lot through his subtlety. Harrison Ford isn't in the movie as much as I wanted him to be (he's still one of my all-time favourite actors) but he holds up his end. He works with Gosling well and they have a solid rapport. Surprisingly, I really liked Sylvia Hoeks. She stole a lot of her scenes and I thought she was great even acting against a stacked cast. Dave Bautista showed he has a lot more range than people give him credit for. Jared Leto is in a very Jared Leto role (deliberately weird and hard to understand) but he does it well and although he might be a little creepy, the guy is still a great actor. I also want to credit Ana de Armas, she was distinctly warm and she showed a lot more emotion than I had seen from her previously.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

FillTheAndroidOct 30, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Yes, they do. So the film says, not the book. And new part of the Blade Runner continues the story of those who have souls, even if they're nothing more but replicants. Deep loud music written by Hans Zimmer with bright neon pictures of the future draws this world you'd never want to live in, but the world you'd want to take a look at. Blade runners still chasing replicants, replicats still trying to save their lifes. But now there's a greatest goal in this world. Replicants need to find a messiah, who will lead them to the freedom.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

7

PyledwNov 18, 2017

If you liked the first film then you will really enjoy this film. Honestly this movie feels exactly like the original film. That blending of the old style with the new makes this an any enjoyable film for any movie lover.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

10

acoolguyOct 8, 2017

The future of waifu technology is looking bright.

(The movie was really fantastic just like the original, but the biggest take away for me was what I mentioned above)

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

CapnAwesomeOct 9, 2017

It's an absolute travesty that this movie is a box office bust, but this will definitely be a cult classic like the first Blade Runner. The cinematography and world-building in this movie is unbelievably amazing. It's a 2 hr 43 minute movieIt's an absolute travesty that this movie is a box office bust, but this will definitely be a cult classic like the first Blade Runner. The cinematography and world-building in this movie is unbelievably amazing. It's a 2 hr 43 minute movie that was completely enjoyable the whole time. Great story, great action, great acting, and really does a great job asking the audience what it really means to be human. My favorite movie this year and I would recommend it to everyone.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

Rwmfilm85Oct 9, 2017

After my first view of this film, I felt it was more style over substance, but upon second viewing I realized I was wrong and there is plenty of substance beneath waiting to be uncovered with multiple viewings. If you're a fan of theAfter my first view of this film, I felt it was more style over substance, but upon second viewing I realized I was wrong and there is plenty of substance beneath waiting to be uncovered with multiple viewings. If you're a fan of the original Blade Runner, you'll love this film. If you aren't, as I wasn't a big fan of it, I loved it as a film on its own and it brought more depth and meaning when I went back and viewed the original after seeing this. This is the rare sequel that supersedes the original; think Godfather: Part II or The Dark Knight.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

LuhterOct 9, 2017

A lot of people complain about the slow plot. Well, the first Blade Runner had a slow almost non-existent main plot: Deckard hunts for some replicants. What made it a great movie was the atmosphere, visuals, and philosophical implications.A lot of people complain about the slow plot. Well, the first Blade Runner had a slow almost non-existent main plot: Deckard hunts for some replicants. What made it a great movie was the atmosphere, visuals, and philosophical implications. The movie conveyed exactly the same feeling like the original Blade Runner. The thing is, cinematic techniques evolved. A movie carbon copy of Blade Runner released today won't give the same feeling like back then. And it's amazing Dennis managed to capture that feeling with this sequel. He truly is a master of the craft

While seemingly the film lacked a final "The C-Beams Speech", it actually didn't, because it started with one, "never witness a miracle"

The movie is great. It's slow, but I loved it this way, because a fast movie will make all the visual go to waste. Just don't watch it tired or as an action flick. While the plot line is not his strongest point (neither was the first's movie) it's still engaging, fresh and it doesn't keep you bored. Enjoy the movie as it should: a visual experience… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

KeroliftOct 8, 2017

It's sci-fi brought to perfection, every aspect of the movie was made to honor the prequel while at the same time stand on it's own, the plot is a modern day 80's detectivesque movie, Gosling plays the role the the audience has, someone thatIt's sci-fi brought to perfection, every aspect of the movie was made to honor the prequel while at the same time stand on it's own, the plot is a modern day 80's detectivesque movie, Gosling plays the role the the audience has, someone that knows what has transpired bot doesn't exactly knows how that affects his surroundings, and work his way to discover one of the most deep, solid and human stories that cinematography has to offer, and a classic that is a worthy succesor, a great movie on it's own, and an even better succesor… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

tonyeditorOct 10, 2017

It's fitting that the film has divided audiences the way it has. Seems appropriate to the Blade Runner mythos. I think its achievements swamp its weaknesses. This is an immediate classic and at least the equal to its predecessor.

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

FancypantserOct 8, 2017

We saw the original in '82, fell in love with everything about it. It shaped our family's aesthetic in many ways, and predicted so many changes in society's relation with technology. The sequel is a gift, a treat, a miracle. Such a beautifulWe saw the original in '82, fell in love with everything about it. It shaped our family's aesthetic in many ways, and predicted so many changes in society's relation with technology. The sequel is a gift, a treat, a miracle. Such a beautiful film, will go see it again next week.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

JamesRogersBushOct 9, 2017

There is one constant connecting the few naysayers among the critics of Blade Runner 2049: They all sound surprisingly like the naysayers of the original. I remember watching the original and loving it, even though many critics panned it inThere is one constant connecting the few naysayers among the critics of Blade Runner 2049: They all sound surprisingly like the naysayers of the original. I remember watching the original and loving it, even though many critics panned it in the same way that a few are doing now. The only real difference is that while a majority of critics at first panned the original and then slowly changed their minds, this time most critics get what Blade Runner is all about and are appreciating it from the get-go, while a paltry few, some of whom didn't like the original either, are panning it for much the same reasons the original was panned: It's too obscure, it's a mood piece that doesn't really hold up as a story, it's too long, it's more a series of set pieces than an engaging drama, etc. Well, guess what naysayers, the majority don't care, and all you've done is miss the point and distance yourselves from having a great movie experience. And given time, this Blade Runner, like the original, will grow an audience, beyond it's critics and even it's fan base. Thats what this kind of film does - it comes on like a slow acting drug, that wallops us in the beginning, then slowly drags us to a new place, and finally sinks in, long after we think we are done with it. The seeds that it plants in our psyche will eventually grow into our subconscious, where we will find ourselves having feelings about the film that we didn't have at first viewing. But for some, the seeds will never germinate and they will be left with nothing to show but a feeling of 'what was that all about?' While for those of us whose seeds do grow, a feeling of quiet awe and understanding will begin to take shape. And, if we haven't seen it already, we will begin to see that Blade Runner is most importantly about our inability to ever fully know who we really are and what this drama we are living is really all about. It also shows us a vision of a possible future, that we may already be on our way to creating - a future where love, the most basic emotion of all, like the trees that no longer grow in 2049, finds it hard to find a place to grow. And yet, like the small flowers that Joe finds at the foot of the dead tree where Rachel is buried, love still finds a way to survive.
And finally, eyeball to eyeball, that was and is the first image in both films and the point of the whole thing. Voigt-comp, the ultimate test of who is human and who is not. Technology, testing, and can the test be fool proof, or are we just fooling ourselves into believing that our testing really proves anything? Human or AI? What will be the ultimate difference, how will we tell the difference, and will it even matter when the replicants and AI decide not to take it anymore and then take their place on the evolutionary ladder. Next up, replicant revolution, AI liberation, and the subservience of the human genome to a future where the world is reborn, and love, the one ingredient that cannot be altered or done away with, is still at the heart of existence.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

10

CottenipeteOct 9, 2017

Music and visuals are incredible. The story is good enough. It's long but not unnecessarily drawn out. The length allows it to become immersive. See it in a good imax for added bonus because this movie at top volume is great.

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

9

PeabarterOct 8, 2017

I cautiously got excited to see this movie. Of course, I watched the Final cut version of Blade Runner with my son 2 days before. My anticipation increased when I saw overwhelming critic ratings, but I only read one review ahead of time. II cautiously got excited to see this movie. Of course, I watched the Final cut version of Blade Runner with my son 2 days before. My anticipation increased when I saw overwhelming critic ratings, but I only read one review ahead of time. I was worried that too high expectations would result in my being disappointed with the film. I did note that the film was 2 hrs and 40 minutes long so I prepared myself for a long movie. The obvious place to see this film was the IMAX at the MN zoo which has a true 70 mm screen (97 ft high!!!) and the most awesome sound presentation that I have ever heard.

I'm happy to say that I was not let down by my high expectations. I loved the story, visuals and sound track of Blade Runner 2049! The movie plays like a mystery/detective story and keeps the audience immersed and thinking about what they are watching. This movie may not be for everyone since there are many scenes with no talking as it follows the protagonist, detective K (played well by Ryan Gosling), while he works the clues and moves around the futuristic world. Just sit back and enjoy the visuals and music score during these scenes. It is so nice to see a movie that is built around an intricate story with character development and not just how many chase scenes they can string together. Hollywood are you listening??? Blade Runner 2049 does a great job stitching the special effects into the movie to complement the story rather than vice versa. Be sure to watch the original Blade Runner before going to see this movie. The stories are linked and you will be doing yourself a disservice otherwise.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

MaxsonOct 8, 2017

The movie might be a bit too long for some people, and there's definitely a lot to take in while watching this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel, and very faithful to the original. The movie is absolutely gorgeous, every scene isThe movie might be a bit too long for some people, and there's definitely a lot to take in while watching this movie. Blade Runner 2049 is a great sequel, and very faithful to the original. The movie is absolutely gorgeous, every scene is like a piece of art. Surprisingly, I was never bored with the movie thanks to the captivating dialogues and great acting from the cast.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

LukibusOct 10, 2017

Stunning, immersive, thrilling. A special mention deserves the photografy, colors, music and sound effects, which creates a wonderful sense of immersion. The story is surely more complex and rich compared to the first one (it has more twistsStunning, immersive, thrilling. A special mention deserves the photografy, colors, music and sound effects, which creates a wonderful sense of immersion. The story is surely more complex and rich compared to the first one (it has more twists and complexity). I was amazed and captivated till the end of the movie.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

The3AcademySinsOct 11, 2017

This is the amazing sequel to Blade Runner that we definitely did not deserve. It's better than any Blade Runner sequel I could have imagined. The direction is fantastic, and it might be Dennis Villeneuve's best work to date. The acting isThis is the amazing sequel to Blade Runner that we definitely did not deserve. It's better than any Blade Runner sequel I could have imagined. The direction is fantastic, and it might be Dennis Villeneuve's best work to date. The acting is beautiful, and there is not a weak link in the cast. The script is mind blowingly incredible, and very true to the original Blade Runner film.

This movie is an experience. You will be transported to this other world and blown away. Watch this movie on the biggest screen that you can, it will only add to how beautiful this movie looks. I spent the rest of the day thinking about life after I walked out of the theater. This movie will inspire you. Go see it.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

8

valerianOct 9, 2017

I’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this film taken a lot of inspiration from Baraka and Ghost in the Shell (1995).

Both films in my opinion, are perfect, for what they intended to aim, but they can be very straining for mostI’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised if this film taken a lot of inspiration from Baraka and Ghost in the Shell (1995).

Both films in my opinion, are perfect, for what they intended to aim, but they can be very straining for most viewers because it felt slow or confusing to watch. And both these films were barely an hour long.

This film very similar to these except, it has double the length time. And that can be straining for even really patient audiences.

Not for everyone, but to those who want to be immersed into such a well thought out, beautiful world, it’ll be up your ally.

This film needed better editing, especially at around the last 45 min mark though.

Really nice surprise! 8.9/10… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

JLuis_001Oct 11, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Blade Runner is one of my favorite movies of all time, let's start out there, not only it's a great movie; it's also one of the fundamental pieces of science fiction in cinema. Ridley Scott's vision, the images, the music, another legendary role for Harrison Ford, the cult to the film, everything that encloses the name Blade Runner implies too many things.

Now let's take into account a director like Denis Villeneuve who in recent years has been cementing an exceptional career, his last five films have been among the best of cinema in their respective years of release.

Now bring those things together in a sequel, a sequel to a movie that many fans consider untouchable, a sequel that comes thirty five years after the original. To say that the expectations were gigantic is to stay too short, not only for everything that represents the original film but for the reputation of its director, but I also realized that it was completely unfair to judge the film for that.

But what was of Blade Runner 2049? Honestly? I honestly am very happy about the movie I watched, 2049 is a movie that did not damage the legacy of the original but rather enhances it, a sequel worthy of the name and in my opinion one of the most beautiful films visually speaking in the last decade.

I will not reveal anything independently of all those who have already seen it but what I can say that despite the simplicity of the plot in general, this is a coherent and functional story, everything is in place and pretty much works really good. Ryan Gosling as K manages to create an interesting, complicated, deep enough character completely different from what Harrison Ford did. Obviously the difference lies in that K is a replicant, therefore his path is different. The plot follows a simple but profound argumentative line; after all, the repercussions of the events that develop after the discovery of K are enormous and somehow establish what could give rise to another or other films, although it's something I doubt enormously.

The themes of 2049 deal with identity, the soul, love, artificiality, evolution, faith, hope and yes in the end talks about revolution, the lesson that is learned and the film belongs to Gosling's character, there should be no doubt about that. Harrison Ford makes his appearance like Deckard but he is not the focus of this movie, although its character has a substantial weight in the plot.

Now let's talk about the technical marvel that is 2049, let's start with the visual, **** me, Roger Deakins created something awesome, the shots in their entirety are intoxicating, Blade Runner 2049 is a visual orgasm, I don't have the slightest doubt, I haven't seen another film this year that looks like this one, I must emphasize it, it is ridiculous the visual level of this film and also the sets play a very important role and these are also first class, especially those of the offices of Wallace Corporation and in Las Vegas, that scene in which Ryan Gosling is walking through the sand with that brutal orange palette is beautiful, to hang it in a museum, what else can I say? is just spectacular.

Hans Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch's score, while it does not live up to what Vangelis did is actually pretty good, coupled with the outstanding sound design and sound effects, the film sounds awesome, I had never felt a movie theater vibrate that way.

Now I must speak of the bad things, which is not much but undoubtedly they do have effects in the film, the main one has to do with the way in which certain elements of the plot are carried and the rhythm of the narrative, that has nothing to do with the film's length because even though it lasts almost three hours, the film does not feel overlong at all, it's just that there are slow passages that stop the film a lot and they affect the general fluidity of the narrative.
Another problem has to do with the loose ends, the most surprising one has to do with Wallace - Leto's character - because we do not know what the **** happens with him and it's clear that his character has more at stake than what was seen and the way he disappears from the film is rude and unbelievably unsatisfactory. Those are the only reasons why I don't give it a ten but after that threshold, the movie is excellent.

Blade Runner 2049 is one of the best sequels in history, as I said it earlier is totally worthy to carry the title and also has the total right to erect itself as a complete and solid work of its own. Another home run for Villeneuve I'm more than ready and excited to see what he will do with Dune.

You may not like it; I honestly think it's not for all audiences, especially those who consume mostly or totally commercial films, nothing bad in it but at least if you are going to judge the film, judge it for what it is, no for what you expected.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

CurlleeOct 9, 2017

The 1982 film did not impress me, not even the final cut version. It was simply too boring. So I was not excited about 2049. But I found myself glued to nearly every frame. While the cinematography is the main attraction, most of theThe 1982 film did not impress me, not even the final cut version. It was simply too boring. So I was not excited about 2049. But I found myself glued to nearly every frame. While the cinematography is the main attraction, most of the characters, story, and score were interesting. Great direction and acting. The only things that I was not overly fond of were Leto's character and the last segment of the movie (except the last scene), where it felt out of place compared to the rest of the film. But one of the year's best for me.… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

9

OctavisOct 8, 2017

BR2049 is a masterpiece, a brilliantly directed and absolutely visually stunning film. BR2049 compliments the original 1982 Blade Runner cult classic with action, drama, suspense and a plot which connects the original film perfectly. The filmBR2049 is a masterpiece, a brilliantly directed and absolutely visually stunning film. BR2049 compliments the original 1982 Blade Runner cult classic with action, drama, suspense and a plot which connects the original film perfectly. The film is a must see in an IMAX theater to fully appreciate everything BR2049 has to offer however it is a must see on the big screen. Finally a film has been made that reminds me of why we go to the movies. One of the best films you will ever experience in IMAX or the big screen. Blade Runner 2049 is a must see...… Expand

7 of 12 users found this helpful75

All this user's reviews

10

OlrikusOct 7, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is awesome!
This film clearly respects its predecessor in each and every way and unlike recent bland sequels or reboots, it really stands on it's own.

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

10

temptershellOct 8, 2017

One of the best movies of recent years. Brilliant continuation and spectacular science fiction movie. Amazing pictures, great acting and special effects. Everything is delightful and beautiful. The directorial skills on high level. I waitedOne of the best movies of recent years. Brilliant continuation and spectacular science fiction movie. Amazing pictures, great acting and special effects. Everything is delightful and beautiful. The directorial skills on high level. I waited for this movie many years.… Expand

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

10

FilmaticOct 7, 2017

perfect cinematography, perfect CGI, perfect acting, good story. Perfect metaphors, thought provoking ideas. Best SCI FI of this decade EASILY. enjoyed nearly every single scene, as it was mastered to perfection. Whatever you do WATCH IT INperfect cinematography, perfect CGI, perfect acting, good story. Perfect metaphors, thought provoking ideas. Best SCI FI of this decade EASILY. enjoyed nearly every single scene, as it was mastered to perfection. Whatever you do WATCH IT IN IMAX. PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. IT'S SO BEAUTIFUL VISUALLY, AND AUDIO WISE I WAS ABOUT TO CRY. MAKES DUNKIRK look like a pile of ash.… Expand

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

10

madebywingOct 8, 2017

The film is a simple deep complex poetic masterpiece. Blade Runner 2049 does a perfect job of expanding on the brilliantly sewn seeds that were planted in the original 1982 Blade Runner. Before watching it we recommend you revisit the firstThe film is a simple deep complex poetic masterpiece. Blade Runner 2049 does a perfect job of expanding on the brilliantly sewn seeds that were planted in the original 1982 Blade Runner. Before watching it we recommend you revisit the first and even read analysis online to get into the juicy juice. Blade Runner 2049 was made for those who are familiar with the storyline and is a sci-fi monument and masterpiece. Whatever you do — forget about the reviews! One of the ones to stay away from is written by RICHARD LAWSON From Variety magazine. The following was a headline from another article he wrote: “Who Is America’s Most Envied Kardashian-Jenner? We finally have an answer to this most serious of questions.” Well Richard go back to your social media and most serious questions with the Kardashians.… Expand

11 of 19 users found this helpful118

All this user's reviews

10

clarkestarOct 14, 2017

Masterpiece. All those involved in realising Blade Runner 2049's construction - from the direction, writing, and aesthetic(s) (including the soundscape), to the cinematography, editing and acting - are (surely?!) operating within the upperMasterpiece. All those involved in realising Blade Runner 2049's construction - from the direction, writing, and aesthetic(s) (including the soundscape), to the cinematography, editing and acting - are (surely?!) operating within the upper echelon of film art/design. Thematically profound, visually stunning, and tonally aligned with its predecessor.… Expand

8 of 14 users found this helpful86

All this user's reviews

7

BigDegs29Oct 16, 2017

Interesting movie, but about 30 - 40 minutes too long. It simply couldn't maintain its momentum. That said, I think it's a true sequel to the original, for which I also had pacing issues. If you're a sci-fi buff like me, definitely worth aInteresting movie, but about 30 - 40 minutes too long. It simply couldn't maintain its momentum. That said, I think it's a true sequel to the original, for which I also had pacing issues. If you're a sci-fi buff like me, definitely worth a watch in theaters. Otherwise, wait for home release.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

10

donelsonOct 6, 2017

Yes, a masterpiece of canon, and style, and production. Spare and sensual, with an extraordinary central performance by Ryan Gosling, great plotting and dialogue in an examination of the nature of love, of memory and of identity. The best ofYes, a masterpiece of canon, and style, and production. Spare and sensual, with an extraordinary central performance by Ryan Gosling, great plotting and dialogue in an examination of the nature of love, of memory and of identity. The best of science fiction in that it explores who we really are under almost inconceivable stresses.

You can feel the love and effort poured into this movie in every second of film. The music evokes and expands on the original, returns us to this future we know so well from so long ago now.

Remember: Science fiction has no ceiling.

10 stars.

Update:
I've just seen Blade Runner 2049 for the third time today. I've never done this before for any movie.

Extraordinary. Wonderful. A true masterpiece. Each time I see it, it gets better, deeper, and more profound. The script, direction and performances are flawless.
The gentle love scene with the hologram Joi actively blending with the real girl Mariette, matching their movements, to allow Joi to physically express her love for K is exquisite. Astonishing. The best and most extraordinary love scene I've ever experienced in the cinema. I wept.

So much of this movie is so profound, so searching and wonderful. The themes of identity, memory, and love are explored with joy and respect. I will see the movie again, in a week or so.… Expand

14 of 25 users found this helpful1411

All this user's reviews

10

Jess_HillOct 6, 2017

Exquisite. This is a beautifully crafted sequel worthy of the original, with the dystopian universe faithfully recreated and enhanced whilst maintaining the iconic aesthetic of the world. With perhaps the finest score of the year, stunninglyExquisite. This is a beautifully crafted sequel worthy of the original, with the dystopian universe faithfully recreated and enhanced whilst maintaining the iconic aesthetic of the world. With perhaps the finest score of the year, stunningly sumptuous visuals, and superb cinematography, this is a sensory feast that is best enjoyed in a theatre. Gosling gives his most enigmatic performance to date, and the performances are polished and nuanced throughout. Carefully paced and edited, this takes time to allow poignant moments to breathe, resulting in a very long but satisfying experience. A sublime film. 9.94/10… Expand

14 of 25 users found this helpful1411

All this user's reviews

7

Rebecca31Oct 7, 2017

A sequel to the cult classic Blade Runner 1982. We live in a world where movie sequels, prequels and remakes plague our cinemas. It's exhausting to read about yet another sequel set 20+ years after the original. In the case of Blade RunnerA sequel to the cult classic Blade Runner 1982. We live in a world where movie sequels, prequels and remakes plague our cinemas. It's exhausting to read about yet another sequel set 20+ years after the original. In the case of Blade Runner it's 35 years later, a definite risk and rarely pays off but we need not have worried. I'll start by saying I was never a huge fan of the original Blade Runner, for some reason I never got caught up in the hype and I feel almost the same towards Blade Runner 2049. It's great, visually spectacular and I enjoyed it but at the same time I wasn't exactly blown away by it. Yet this is a movie that shows you just how a sequel should be made. Well done Denis Villeneuve you've done something many people thought impossible, you've kept the fanboys happy whilst bringing in a new generation of fans all while keeping true to Blade Runner.

I won't say too much about the story, the less you know the better. Ryan Gosling stars as a young Blade Runner who tracks down former Blade Runner Harrison Ford. It's stunning just to watch, the attention to detail in every shot is mesmerizing. Chances are you probably won't see a more beautiful movie this year. Each scene seems to linger, not wanting to move on, allowing you to immerse yourself in this beautiful world. Not only is it hypnotic to look at but it's accompanied by that incredible soundtrack we know so well. Only on a grander scale, it certainly doesn't hold back. The acting is superb, Gosling and Ford make a great team. Poor Jared Leto can't catch a break these days. His character seemed grossly underused and honestly very wasted. Yet considering the much talked about running time of 163 minutes I don't know how this could have happened. Disappointing to see but I'll get over it.

A sequel that not only stays true to the original content but brings it to a whole new level. A definite recommendation for all you sci-fi fans and a must see for the Blade Runner fans.… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

10

victoralvarezOct 8, 2017

This movie is a stand out in newer sic fi titles due to the fact that it uses plot, details, and conversations to engage the viewer instead of action as most sic fi films do. While some may say this is the weak point of this film I love thisThis movie is a stand out in newer sic fi titles due to the fact that it uses plot, details, and conversations to engage the viewer instead of action as most sic fi films do. While some may say this is the weak point of this film I love this since it just makes the movie even more interesting by introducing and developing character, which I personally find important in a movie for it to be engaging to me. Another part of this film that I loved was the overall aesthetic of the environment, with its futuristic, gloomy California it creates a very iconic setting for the film. The story and cast however are definitely the centerpieces of the film, since the cast was chosen very well to match their characters, and the story is just unimaginably well written in my opinion.… Expand

10 of 18 users found this helpful108

All this user's reviews

10

PeterAlexanderDec 6, 2017

Stunning imagery, immersive sound effects, well-crafted characters and a story filled with mystery ensure Denis Villeneuve's sequel matches the original Blade Runner. Blade Runner 2049 brings the dystopian world back to life in spectacular fashion.

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

10

terenceOct 7, 2017

Superior to the original Blade Runner, and one of the best scifi films for both scifi fans and non-fans alike. I just rewatched the original Blade Runner last night so this is not a comparison based on distant memories. The sequel has aSuperior to the original Blade Runner, and one of the best scifi films for both scifi fans and non-fans alike. I just rewatched the original Blade Runner last night so this is not a comparison based on distant memories. The sequel has a richer but also more approachable and understandable story, better acting and cast, and even better cinematography and music. Must see! Don't be scared away by the weak box office results or long run-time.… Expand

11 of 20 users found this helpful119

All this user's reviews

9

Gamed2longNov 5, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful unicorn of a film. The kind of film that only comes along once every few years. And it'll probably be talked about for years. Its very much art house film but with a modern blockbusters budget and resources.Blade Runner 2049 is a beautiful unicorn of a film. The kind of film that only comes along once every few years. And it'll probably be talked about for years. Its very much art house film but with a modern blockbusters budget and resources. The film plays with complex concepts that can quickly turn into debates. People have complained that the film is long and drags on. And if your looking for action events and plot twists that will be your experience. The film is like a 10 layer puzzle. The problem, like the original, is that the simplest layer on the bottom is strange and doesn't have much going on. Since that is usually all there is to simpler action flicks, if you don't look on other levels for more then you get bored. But on every other layer of the puzzle the pieces add up. The rules of the universe are self consistent and not broken. The narrative makes certain logic jumps without spoon-feeding you the information. Again, off-putting to people used to being spoon-fed every plot point. My experience for the first viewing of the film was with a language I am not yet fluent in. So a lot of the conversation was lost on me. I was amazed by the visual storytelling that was going on. My second viewing, in my native language, only added to it, though it helped I could focus on other details the second time around. More than 1 viewing suggested! Overall it is an incredibly impressive film, toying with the fundamental concept of what it means to be human. And what it means to be human in a world where memory can be implanted, where creations are becoming more perfect than their creators and what it means when you can't tell the difference anymore. In a way the film borrows ideas from other P.K.Dicks novels and takes them great places. True to the universe of the original film it also cut key elements of the book out. Overall best film I've seen in ages. Also props to the director. The romantic encounter scene is something absolutely unique. Given how often that contents been put to film, truly a feat!… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

3

2morovianJan 18, 2018

The film tries to impress us with its connection to the original, when in fact it just cannibalizes the Ridley Scott masterpiece for the only value it has. It's just not organically woven into the new film and it's painfully obvious, rightThe film tries to impress us with its connection to the original, when in fact it just cannibalizes the Ridley Scott masterpiece for the only value it has. It's just not organically woven into the new film and it's painfully obvious, right down to the 'imitation Vangelis' soundtrack which is so bad it should be illegal. 2049 has no depth and dimension and points to the work of a very mediocre director re-configuring and dispensing the bland expectations of a 21st century sci-fi audience who are so dumbed-down by 21st century schlock by now that they, sadly, can't tell the difference. I had to keep telling myself that the film had nothing to do with the original just to get through, but then I was left with the stark, 2-dimensionality of a truly poor work that relies on its visual effects and darkest themes to anesthetize the audience into believing they actually saw something worthwhile.… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

10

HusnanOct 12, 2017

From beginning to end, this movie holds your attention. I was a fan of the original, but not a die-hard fan. When I saw this, I was completely blown away. I had incredible expectations for this movie. The character development, narrative,From beginning to end, this movie holds your attention. I was a fan of the original, but not a die-hard fan. When I saw this, I was completely blown away. I had incredible expectations for this movie. The character development, narrative, script, editing, cinematography, directing, sets, miniatures, VFX, are just out of this world. A true Sci-Fi masterpiece.… Expand

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

10

gislenecarvalhoOct 12, 2017

A direction of art and photography that makes the sequence of Blade Runner seem even more grandiose than its predecessor. Philip K. Dick would be proud of this sequence if he were alive.

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

10

Morten67Oct 18, 2017

Utterly amazing! Perfect blend of dystopia and reviviting panoramas, screenplay and atmosphere. If Rutger Hauers character had partaken I had been sublime for me but that would probably mess with the story and the CGI.

6 of 11 users found this helpful65

All this user's reviews

8

LamontRaymondOct 6, 2017

It's crazy just how much I felt like I was back in the 80s. The tone and feel of the movie so mirrored the original. But the grandeur and sound (I think this film did some serious damage to speakers in my AMC) are off-the-charts. I love howIt's crazy just how much I felt like I was back in the 80s. The tone and feel of the movie so mirrored the original. But the grandeur and sound (I think this film did some serious damage to speakers in my AMC) are off-the-charts. I love how it rolls out thematically, and it scratches that nostalgic itch with several call-backs. Yes, it's a little long and certain scenes get stretch out, but wow, were the women roles in this film incredible. I'll have to see it again.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeOct 6, 2017

The very surprising fact how this sequel, 35 years later from the original's release, manages to take the things very lovable about its predecessor and make them a lot better for the modern people. The long 35-year wait is finally over. YouThe very surprising fact how this sequel, 35 years later from the original's release, manages to take the things very lovable about its predecessor and make them a lot better for the modern people. The long 35-year wait is finally over. You can go in and out with a hyped face because this sure is going to be a movie you got to see for yourself to feel the real experience.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

10

cabo32Oct 6, 2017

With the original film being one of my favorite movies of all time, it was hard for me to believe the sequel could live up to the original. It does not live up to the original. It equals the original and simultaneously provides a storylineWith the original film being one of my favorite movies of all time, it was hard for me to believe the sequel could live up to the original. It does not live up to the original. It equals the original and simultaneously provides a storyline that seamlessly continues the original, 30 years later, while throughout paying 'homage' to the original in so countless subtle ways that blend the two productions together. Blade Runner is the movie it became thanks to the amazing visuals and the groundbreaking and timeless score by Vangelis which created the Los Angeles of the future in Blade Runner.

Blade Runner 2049 blends the original Vangelis sound with strikingly heavy, dark, atmospheric sound. Think of it as Vangelis blended with Trent Reznor & Atticus Ross' Book of Eli sound, and combine them with subtle hints of the Gravity & Interstellar soundtracks.

Exceptionally heavy and chilling and just as Vangelis' original score, creating a future world of undeniable and frightening reality; and for 2049, the overbearing heaviness of the music during the slow, unfolding scenes throughout the film, especially Sea Wall, provide a stunning depth and impact to the film. 2 hours 43 minutes too long? Not if you're a fan and looking for another 5 versions.

This is the Director's Cut and the storyline is much more profound and creepy once you think about it on your way home. There a few sequels that stand on their own to the original. This is a masterpiece of special effects, sets, and the storyline sets up BR3 effectively. It took 35 years for the sequel and it was worth the wait for the right people to come together and create their vision of BR and brilliantly succeed.

Worth the wait? Absolutely; and a must see on a big screen with a powerful sound system behind it the first time.

As a big fan of the orginal, thank you to everyone involved in the making of this film. It is....an experience.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

10

alainduchesneauOct 6, 2017

You’re gonna love it — or hate it. And that’s the best quality I can think of of a movie. It means that Denis Villeneuve made a very personal and thoughtful piece of art.
A feast for the eyes AND the ears. Go see this in the theatre next youYou’re gonna love it — or hate it. And that’s the best quality I can think of of a movie. It means that Denis Villeneuve made a very personal and thoughtful piece of art.
A feast for the eyes AND the ears. Go see this in the theatre next you that have the best sound system. And the biggest screen, of course.
Big thumbs up to the cast. (Maybe just one thumb up for Jared Leto and Robin Wright…)
You may feel that some scene could have been cut, and you'd be right. Hence, this is not the masterpiece some reviewers are acclaiming, but it's close.… Expand

13 of 24 users found this helpful1311

All this user's reviews

9

allisonjane65Oct 7, 2017

I think negative comparisons with the original Blade Runner are unfair and unwarranted because BR2049 is an excellent stand alone movie. A knowledge of the original isn't really necessary {although an understanding of Deckard and Rachel'sI think negative comparisons with the original Blade Runner are unfair and unwarranted because BR2049 is an excellent stand alone movie. A knowledge of the original isn't really necessary {although an understanding of Deckard and Rachel's relationship would help}. Go and see it on the biggest screen you can and prepare to be wowed!… Expand

14 of 26 users found this helpful1412

All this user's reviews

10

DuraznitoOct 6, 2017

Simplemente espectacular, sublime, hermoso. Mi miedo mas grande era que esta película sea puramente acción y nada de trama, menos mal que me equivoque. La historia es bellisima con algunos giros de guion inesperados. No es la peliculaSimplemente espectacular, sublime, hermoso. Mi miedo mas grande era que esta película sea puramente acción y nada de trama, menos mal que me equivoque. La historia es bellisima con algunos giros de guion inesperados. No es la pelicula perfecta, tiene algunas incongruencias, pero para durar 3 horas sabe llevar bastante bien toda la traba debido a su ambientacion y trama. Una buena sucesora de la Blade Runner original… Expand

14 of 26 users found this helpful1412

All this user's reviews

9

kheasOct 8, 2017

Having grown up in the 80's and 90's I was exposed to many amazing films. Films that set the stage for the cinema we now know. Groundbreaking themes, visuals, sound and more. The original film, Blade Runner, was one of these films andHaving grown up in the 80's and 90's I was exposed to many amazing films. Films that set the stage for the cinema we now know. Groundbreaking themes, visuals, sound and more. The original film, Blade Runner, was one of these films and when a sequel was (finally) officially announced, I was both delighted and skeptical of this new film. Having seen it today, I am pleased to announce that I feel it was the perfect sequel, flaws and all. for more: http://wp.me/p93it6-Ik… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

LauberfenOct 8, 2017

Matches the tone, style and philosophical reflections of the original, while clearly advancing the plot, rather than attempting a re-boot. Moves into a more clearly dystopia setting, which is a plus in my book. Sound track has clearMatches the tone, style and philosophical reflections of the original, while clearly advancing the plot, rather than attempting a re-boot. Moves into a more clearly dystopia setting, which is a plus in my book. Sound track has clear similarities to Arrival, but ends up a little aggressive; both uncomfortably loud at points and some too quiet dialogue. Demands a second viewing.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

10

DigitalMindZOct 8, 2017

Je reviens du cinéma où j’ai vu, à mon avis, l’un des meilleurs films de cette année : Blade Runner 2049. C’est une suite qui respecte beaucoup le style visuel et narratif du premier tome de 1982. Blade Runner 2049 est une expérience richeJe reviens du cinéma où j’ai vu, à mon avis, l’un des meilleurs films de cette année : Blade Runner 2049. C’est une suite qui respecte beaucoup le style visuel et narratif du premier tome de 1982. Blade Runner 2049 est une expérience riche tant et si bien que j’ai eut l’impression d’écouter de la musique classique, mais en regardant un écran. Denis Villeneuve ne se contente pas simplement de raconter une histoire en présentant une série de plans rapides, mais il prend le temps de partager le moment tel que vécu par les personnages. Il explore les différentes perspectives d’une scène afin d’accentuer son impact. De plus, il stimule notre sens auditif comme moyen mnémonique en référence à d’autres scènes. Je vous encourage grandement à aller voir ce film très bien réalisé. J’ai déjà envie de le revoir. Et il vaut définitivement la pleine de se le procurer sur Blu Ray.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

Mragusa2Oct 8, 2017

A true masterpiece, both in terms of science fiction, and the art of cinema in general. Visually, it's one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen, period. Nearly every scene looks like something out of a painting. The acting isA true masterpiece, both in terms of science fiction, and the art of cinema in general. Visually, it's one of the most beautiful films I have ever seen, period. Nearly every scene looks like something out of a painting. The acting is phenomenal, with a near perfect cast. One of my biggest criticisms with most of today's movies is that they never take the time to tell their story. Blade Runner does exactly the opposite: each & every scene is critical to the plot of the film, so when you hear someone say it's sucks because of how long it is, they probably prefer loud, boring movies like Michael Bay's crapfest.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

8

InActionMan64Oct 10, 2017

Totally worth it. Feels like BR, looks like BR, sounds like BR. Yes, there's sequel setup but its subtle and non-invasive to the story. As to the sexism angle, this is an elseworlds setting with non-humans, there are things that look humanTotally worth it. Feels like BR, looks like BR, sounds like BR. Yes, there's sequel setup but its subtle and non-invasive to the story. As to the sexism angle, this is an elseworlds setting with non-humans, there are things that look human but aren't.… Expand

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

imraankOct 8, 2017

Visually stunning. Lack of context may come about for some who have not seen the original and may not result as an enjoyable experience within terms of storyline. Denis Villeneuve is the next Nolan.

7 of 13 users found this helpful76

All this user's reviews

9

DubeauOct 9, 2017

BR 2049 continues the story of the replicants and blade runner. It does so by branching new intrigues into the original script and adding dept. The presentation of the future is still a great warning for all of us. The movie has amazing FXBR 2049 continues the story of the replicants and blade runner. It does so by branching new intrigues into the original script and adding dept. The presentation of the future is still a great warning for all of us. The movie has amazing FX and has some actions. But the main effect of this movie is still the atmosphere and partially Vangelis alike music. I say alike, because it's a pale imitation of Vangelis style and the music is sadly not always that great, and become too many times a collection of sound effects. The actors are excellent, even the side characters are interesting. Don't go to that movie if you want an action flick or you are tired. The movie required your attention, even if it's mostly a visual film, the plot can be elaborate enough. Villeneuve did a fascinating movie that will go into the rank of classic, with the original one...no less. The music is maybe the aspect where it seems too loud and lacking variety. I give it a 90%, go see it if you love scifi. Update: At second viewing, I found that it lacked some action in the middle of the movie. The problem is that maybe, for a Blade Runner, he didn't do much of it in the movie (except at the beginning). Also many scenes linger too much, and it slow down the pace when they come in succession. But if you approach this as a detective movie, it kind of fits better. Still think it's a good movie.… Expand

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

8

mintloOct 6, 2017

I have to admit I wasn't asking for a Blade Runner sequel, and when I heard they were doing one my expectations were rock bottom. I was pleasantly surprised and I enjoyed it. I appreciate how the story was simple, there was more focus onI have to admit I wasn't asking for a Blade Runner sequel, and when I heard they were doing one my expectations were rock bottom. I was pleasantly surprised and I enjoyed it. I appreciate how the story was simple, there was more focus on visuals and 'showing' rather than explaining and talking. I got sucked in to the movie and forgot about reality for 146 minutes which was nice.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

9

jdb26354Oct 6, 2017

First time I saw the original Blade Runner (“2019”), I just stayed in my seat at the theater until the next showing and watched it again. I taped the movie at the theater to have the soundtrack, whose official version wasn’t released forFirst time I saw the original Blade Runner (“2019”), I just stayed in my seat at the theater until the next showing and watched it again. I taped the movie at the theater to have the soundtrack, whose official version wasn’t released for years. These facts put me in a 0.1% slice of fans of the movie.
So what to say of Blade Runner 2049 (“2049”)?
2019 pulled you into a world and a mood. The opening scene of Los Angeles in 2019 is not matched in 2049.
Making a virtue of necessity, Ridley Scott set 2019 at night (except for the controversial ending scene), which is cheaper to convey in the grimly grand manner he sought. Denis Villeneuve had the budget to venture into the day, which pays off best at the end, with the rest resting in an uneasy truce with sepia. The plot of 2019 was pedestrian; I think a Harrison Ford quote can be found that he played a detective who did not detect much. The plot of 2049 is hardly elaborate, but is more developed and satisfactory. Gosling is a god, and 2019 fans owe him a great debt for his embrace of the project despite the cult. 2019 actually aspired to the epic more in portrayal than in theme. 2049 has greater pretense to the epic—I spoil nothing, just watch the trailer (“the world is built on a wall that separates kind”). 2049 settles for less, but less ends up more. 2049 has a cracker jack supporting cast, although none delivers a line like Rutger Hauer’s “tears in the rain” from 2019. That’s what makes magic magic.
I’m glad that age and 2019’s cult status brought Harrison Ford back to the wisdom of his original choice to play Deckard. Sometimes you don’t give your younger self enough credit. Score honored the original, and sound generally was solid.
In sum, the army assembled by the hope of a reprise captures the prize of a wonderfully worthy movie in its own right. Doing justice to both 2019 and 2049, you watch no mere sequel. Too long? Perhaps. But better than gone.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

9

pixelcraftablesOct 7, 2017

A fantastic visual spectacle in which the scenes speak stronger than the dialogue, forcing you to think and reflect on the themes touched. The story's focus is indirectly Deckard (Harrison Ford), and the mystery and intrigue of the desolate,A fantastic visual spectacle in which the scenes speak stronger than the dialogue, forcing you to think and reflect on the themes touched. The story's focus is indirectly Deckard (Harrison Ford), and the mystery and intrigue of the desolate, emotionless, replicant society where K (Ryan Gosling) operates keeps pushing the story forward towards its climax. Excellent performances by all actors, with Harrison Ford and especially Ana de Armis being the highlights, however I felt that Jared Leto's character Wallace was written to stylistically different from the other characters, and felt out of place compared to everyone else.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

10

CometerOct 17, 2017

Well worth it. And quite frankly they managed to keep it true to the original while still being original. This is a movie so worth watching in the big screen for the astonishing sound and breathtaking sci-fi environments. But that is not whatWell worth it. And quite frankly they managed to keep it true to the original while still being original. This is a movie so worth watching in the big screen for the astonishing sound and breathtaking sci-fi environments. But that is not what the movie is about. It's about characters. Story.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

9

Notarius2323Oct 7, 2017

p«Бегущий по лезвию 2049 »: Снятся ли андроидам достойные сиквелы? В 1982 году, с жанром научной фантастики произошел феномен имя которому Бегущий по лезвию, за авторством сэра Ридли Скотта. Центральной темой фильма были взаимоотношения междуp«Бегущий по лезвию 2049 »: Снятся ли андроидам достойные сиквелы? В 1982 году, с жанром научной фантастики произошел феномен имя которому Бегущий по лезвию, за авторством сэра Ридли Скотта. Центральной темой фильма были взаимоотношения между репликантами (искусственной формой жизни) и людьми, а так же затрагивалась тема: жизни и смерти. Критики смешано отреагировали на картину и их мнения разделились: кто-то ругал фильм за излишнюю монотонность, а кто-то хвалил визуальную составляющую. В прокате у кинокартины Скотта дела тоже не заладились, где ее ждал провал. И все же, это не помешало «Бегущему по лезвию» выдержать испытание временем и приобрести статус культовой кинокартины. Прошло 30 лет, на большие экраны выходит сиквел, «Бегущий по лезвию 2049» в режиссерском кресле Дени Вильнев, Ридли Скотт значится продюсером, а за сценарий отвечает автор оригинала Хэмптон Финчер. Что же получилось у канадского кинорежиссера? Вильнев не скрывал, что многие элементы в сценарии он переработал под свое видение, при этом развивая основную идею оригинала. Фильм затрагивает тему человечности и поднимает ряд вопросов: что делает человека, человеком? Наличие души? Мораль или может быть эмоции? Вопросы, проходят сквозь сюжет поделенный на 3 акта – ближе к финалу, которого, ожидает Рик Декард 30 лет хранивший тайну способную перевернуть мир. В «Бегущем по Лезвию 2049» окончательно размыта грань между человеком и новыми моделями репликантов, оно и неудивительно ведь главный девиз Tyrell Corporation: "больше человек, чем сам человек". Как и в оригинале у картины неспешный темп повествования и большой акцент на деталях, а хронометраж составляет неполные 3 часа. Вообще любая попытка углубления в тему сюжета - спойлер, поэтому детали стоит опустить. Одна из сильнейших сторон фильма – визуальная составляющая, каждый кадр настоящее произведение искусства: его построение, плавность переходов, великолепная работа с цветовой гаммой и неважно будь то урбанистические джунгли дождливого Лос-Анджелеса, усыпанные тысячами неоновых вывесок и голограмм или апокалиптические руины старого города. Роджер Дикинс – настоящий маэстро, в его послужном списке такие работы, как «Побег и Шоушенка», «Старикам тут не место» и 7 номинаций на премию Оскар. «Бегущий по лезвию 2049», образцовый сиквел и значимое событие для современной кинофантастики, в то время пока некоторые студии продолжают штамповать ремейки или продолжения на грани ремейка, Дени Вильнев, снимает свое авторское видение «Бегущего по Лезвию» развивая идеи оригинала, а не эксплуатирует старые. Итог: к просмотру обязательно… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

9

jacoobi456Oct 6, 2017

Blade Runner 2049 is a sequel to the amazing 1982 film, this time directed by Denis Villeneuve. This film was aesthetically outstanding in every way. The costumes were incredible, the sets and set design made you connect so much more with theBlade Runner 2049 is a sequel to the amazing 1982 film, this time directed by Denis Villeneuve. This film was aesthetically outstanding in every way. The costumes were incredible, the sets and set design made you connect so much more with the characters because they felt so real, especially in downtown LA. You could tell a lot of effort went into the different sets, as each one is son unique, from K's (Ryan Gosling's) bedroom to the offices in the LAPD tower to the farm etc. Speaking of Ryan Gosling, he's done another great job in this role. Not once did I doubt he was a Blade Runner, and he effortlessly explorers his characters' subplot (one which I will not elaborate on for obvious reasons), and he just radiated bad-assery. There were a lot of takes with little to no sound/script, and all we had to look at were the amazing sets and emoting of the actors, which was pretty much always impeccable. All the actors and actresses involved did great performances - Harrison Ford slipped back into his role as Rick Deckard just like he was back in the 80's, and the villain(s) were menacing and equally as compelling as Gosling & Ford. (If it's not obvious already, the cameos of people in the 1982 version were very, very much appreciated!)

Probably my favourite aspect was the multitude of different angles and shots that Villeneuve used, as it constantly gave so many different perspectives of the sets and the characters and told the story in a very technical yet beautiful way, which leads me to congratulate the editors on a very good job well done. Not only did they tell the story well, they seamlessly linked flashbacks with the present plot, and often films can suffer from poor/excessive flashbacks, and I am happy to say: this one doesn't. As for issues, the pacing suffered on a few occasions, and to be perfectly honest I felt the film went on a little too long. There were some long takes (only some, as some were extremely effective) that dragged on a bit, and made me almost wish that it would cut to a different character/scene. Also,even though the sound was outstanding in this film and so sheerly loud, I sometimes felt the music was a little out of place in some scenes. This is probably one of my personal nit-picks, but in a couple of occasions I was like 'why is there music playing right now?' However, when there needed to be music there was, so there weren't scenes where I was asking for it to be added, just a couple where I think it should've been removed, (again, probably a personal thing.) The action scenes were great and well-choreographed, but to be honest I was expecting a few more that there actually was. Conclusion: if you liked the first one, definitely see this one (but I think you'll prefer the first one, I know I did), and even if you haven't seen the first one you should check it out, as it is visually stunning.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

8

VoloxiOct 6, 2017

As someone who loved the original, I'm very happy this movie was made. But I have to say that all the grandeur that this movie is and represents is ruined by one simple thing. Ryan Gosling. Oh yes, he at first seems like the obvious choiceAs someone who loved the original, I'm very happy this movie was made. But I have to say that all the grandeur that this movie is and represents is ruined by one simple thing. Ryan Gosling. Oh yes, he at first seems like the obvious choice for the roll, I see that. Except that he plays the same character in all his movies; a person who expresses nothing. You can shoot him, stab him, kick him square in the balls, and the most you'll ever get as a reaction is that faint, quirky smile he's so known for. Personally, I don't see any difference between his characters, and how he behaves as a person off-camera. And I want to like him. I really do. But when he's put next to any other actor in the film, especially someone like the charismatic Harrison Ford, his brooding sense of quiet falls flat. When they told him he was to play a robot, did he envision something from a 50's sci-fi classic? All he needs are the short jerky movements and some beeps and boops and there it is. And Jared Leto is just as guilty. His calm and cool sociopathic representation of corporate owner just did not bring anything to the performance. Villian 101: you have to almost like them and fall to their charms to truly despise them when they are bad. In this respect, the original still wins out as the better film in my opinion.… Expand

10 of 19 users found this helpful109

All this user's reviews

9

SirwootalotOct 6, 2017

This is the closest thing we will ever have to a new movie by Andrei Tarkovsky.
The slow, deliberate pacing is crucial; it is meditative and entrancing, and the scenes between K and his "wife" are thoroughly Lynchian in their drawn-outThis is the closest thing we will ever have to a new movie by Andrei Tarkovsky.
The slow, deliberate pacing is crucial; it is meditative and entrancing, and the scenes between K and his "wife" are thoroughly Lynchian in their drawn-out intense discomfort.

I don't want to spoil too much, but there is a gun battle in a special sort of abandoned room - and it just might be the most bizarre, haunting, and perfect scene in Sci-fi cinema since the 1970s.

The only things holding me back from giving a perfect 10/10 are that the music, while very good, wasn't as "Vangelis-ey" as I would have liked - and that Jared Leto's performance stands out as being very awkward and overwrought in a movie that is otherwise a broiling ocean of wordless emotion and memory.… Expand