Big Eyes
Weinstein Company, The | Release Date: December 25, 2014
7.2
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 216 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
146
Mixed:
58
Negative:
12
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
5
tvnewsguidoJan 11, 2015
I found it a trifle boring.

The story is fascinating but not the way the filmmakers chose to tell it. If it's on cable one rainy Sunday afternoon you should watch it.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
heathermJan 4, 2015
This movie felt like a long series of missed opportunities. Both Amy Adams and Christoph Waltz came off as ultimately flat, making it that more frustrating that a cast of supporting characters were kept in the background rather than used toThis movie felt like a long series of missed opportunities. Both Amy Adams and Christoph Waltz came off as ultimately flat, making it that more frustrating that a cast of supporting characters were kept in the background rather than used to flesh out the story. The movie often seemed more concerned with producing a shiny, gorgeous version of the 1950s and 1960s than it did with developing either the plot or the characters. Christoph Waltz isn't quite believable as the charming sociopath, because his charm is too manic from the beginning--I wanted him to be a more talented liar early on, so that his unravelling could be more satisfying. Similarly Amy Adams' misery and submission aren't entirely convincing either, and the hallucinations so prominently advertised in the trailer had a minimal role in the movie, and lacked an accompanying narrative of mental illness to explain or justify them. The movie was still somewhat enjoyable overall, but it felt too glossy and superficial to be a compelling portrait of the Keanes.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
LynJun 27, 2015
This film is well-acted but frustrating. Adams is her usual charming self and Waltz is his usual sparkling-sinister self. Visually, it's great. But there are several key moments when you want so much for Adams's character to reveal the truthThis film is well-acted but frustrating. Adams is her usual charming self and Waltz is his usual sparkling-sinister self. Visually, it's great. But there are several key moments when you want so much for Adams's character to reveal the truth about her artwork -- which would have been great for her sanity and perhaps even workable if done early in their marriage. She doesn't, of course, and where the film falls short is helping us to understand why.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
lasttimeisawAug 1, 2015
When I first read the brief synopsis of this biography feature from Tim Burton about painter Margaret Keane, and the notorious scandal in the art scene of 1960s in America, my prompt answer to how to solve the chief issue - who is the realWhen I first read the brief synopsis of this biography feature from Tim Burton about painter Margaret Keane, and the notorious scandal in the art scene of 1960s in America, my prompt answer to how to solve the chief issue - who is the real creator behind all these paintings, Margaret (Adams) or her husband Walter (Waltz)?- is rather simple, unlike literature and music, painting is an art form too visual-dependent, so why not just let them paint? Then a second thought strikes me that maybe Walter is capable of simulating Margaret’s trademark style, which could elongate this lawsuit case into a more complicated protracted battle. Well, the truth is, I was thinking too much, during the court sequences, after a long-standing filibuster from Walter, which presumably should be funny but only feels insufferable, finally the judge orders them to paint, but as audience has already been informed that Walter simply cannot paint, that is all, case closed, Margaret’s win is such a duck soup, what a stroke of bathos!

keep reading my review on my blog, please google: cinema omnivore, thanks… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
hdbflyDec 27, 2014
Flat. Begins at one level and continues at that level until the end. No connection to the characters, with Christoph Waltz overacting like crazy. Amy Adams wonderful. Writing is meh to terrible--some of it seemed to be a first draft . . .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
LowbrowCinemaJan 2, 2015
Like all of Tim Burton's films, BIG EYES looks great and it may well be his most adult film yet. Unfortunately, Burton's singular imagination doesn't invite real danger. The horror or conflict is easy, fun and childlike. And that's theLike all of Tim Burton's films, BIG EYES looks great and it may well be his most adult film yet. Unfortunately, Burton's singular imagination doesn't invite real danger. The horror or conflict is easy, fun and childlike. And that's the problem with BIG EYES. This most intriguing story of the Keane's and their big eye paintings invites exploration into gender politics, sexism, pop culture v. high art, and the very nature of art itself. I wish the film failed for seeking to explore too many areas, instead Burton and his screenwriters are only interested in rubbing the surface of the Keane's personal story and the filmmakers depict this world with little threat or real consequence. That's why it comes as such as a shock in the final moments when Margaret Keane testifies to being manipulated and threatened. When was there any real threat? Why is her duplicity never explored with any depth? Amy Adams has the chops to deliver what is needed but instead, Burton focuses relentlessly on the shenanigans of Walter Keane. In many ways, Burton and his two male screenwriters are guilty of doing to Margaret's story exactly what Walter did to Margaret in real life. The film is entertaining, but ultimately, nothing more than a diversion when depth and insight were there for the exploring.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
bigtunaonfilmApr 18, 2015
This was a solid film, but it had its issues. This film definitely had the feel of a Tim Burton film, and I feel that it was totally unnecessary. Had David O. Russell (American Hustle) directed it, it would have been even better. ChristopherThis was a solid film, but it had its issues. This film definitely had the feel of a Tim Burton film, and I feel that it was totally unnecessary. Had David O. Russell (American Hustle) directed it, it would have been even better. Christopher Waltz delivers in his performance, and Amy Adams is good, but her fake accent got a bit annoying. The pacing was uneven, as the beginning and end felt rushed, but the middle seemed dragged out. Overall, this was an enjoyable film, but it did not perform to its full potential.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
smiyamotFeb 28, 2016
Okay, I'm old and I was around when the "big eyes" happened. Personally, I thought they were gross (is that a 60's expression?) so this movie was interesting to me to see what went on behind the scenes. Unfortunately, what went on was notOkay, I'm old and I was around when the "big eyes" happened. Personally, I thought they were gross (is that a 60's expression?) so this movie was interesting to me to see what went on behind the scenes. Unfortunately, what went on was not so interesting to make a movie. Ho hum.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
sorou8hDec 20, 2016
When you're watching this movie, about an hour before the movie ends you start questioning why doesn't she sue this guy? she can actually ask the guy to draw one girl with big eyes and then everyone would know that he's a liar, BUT you haveWhen you're watching this movie, about an hour before the movie ends you start questioning why doesn't she sue this guy? she can actually ask the guy to draw one girl with big eyes and then everyone would know that he's a liar, BUT you have to wait all day to same thing happen at the end. So predictable but at the same time not waste of a time because of good acting.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JLuis_001Sep 6, 2017
Big Eyes is a work away from Burton standards, although it has its touch, really if you did not know it would be difficult to know that this work belongs to him, that is neither good nor bad, but neither does it leave one satisfied.
Big EyesBig Eyes is a work away from Burton standards, although it has its touch, really if you did not know it would be difficult to know that this work belongs to him, that is neither good nor bad, but neither does it leave one satisfied.
Big Eyes is almost like a movie to make you feel good and shows a woman who was forced to lie about her art by order of her manipulative husband, but then turns things around in order to claim his name.
I conclude by saying it's not a bad movie and I do recommend it, but it feels weak for the old standards of Burton.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
amheretojudgeJun 5, 2018
narrow and blurred sight..

Big Eyes With a premise so dark and complicated, it gets difficult to pull off such a pitch in a dark tone, instead the makers here decide to take it lightly with a hint of comic tone which unfortunately shattersnarrow and blurred sight..

Big Eyes

With a premise so dark and complicated, it gets difficult to pull off such a pitch in a dark tone, instead the makers here decide to take it lightly with a hint of comic tone which unfortunately shatters the gravitas of the character and the structure of the script. It seemed like the creators didn't willingly supervised to tell the story which is clearly visible in each frame as there is zero passion and enthusiasm on screen in any single aspect. The adaptation isn't as smart as the writers think and addition to that it is a bit chalky around the edges, even though it has its few moments that gives hope to the viewers. Tim Burton whose love for cinema is usually visible, is the missing puzzle and the reason why he fails to execute the anticipated vision on screen. On performance objective too, there appears to be a weakness which comes as a shock considering the potential of the cast like Amy Adams and Christoph Waltz. The feature is shot beautifully and is immensely pleasing on visual aesthetics but unfortunately all of it fades away quickly. Big Eyes is a narrow and blurred sight that is not aware of the vision and the trajectory that it wishes to follow and is the only reason why it never connects with the viewers.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
YungKangJun 20, 2018
The slightly whimsical and charming cinematography helps this film compensate for its rather lackluster characterization.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Slovenly_MuseAug 23, 2018
Strong performances make this movie, which is a straightforward, predictable, but easy-to-watch biopic. While interesting in its examination of some of the ways women are often manipulated and shouldered out of the limelight by men, this filmStrong performances make this movie, which is a straightforward, predictable, but easy-to-watch biopic. While interesting in its examination of some of the ways women are often manipulated and shouldered out of the limelight by men, this film can't help but feel a touch simplistic and trite in its resolution, especially in the #MeToo era.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021
"Big Eyes" boasts a wonderful performance by Amy Adams, solid shot work, and bright colours; all letting us see some majesty in Keane's work. The story of Margaret Keane continues to be a relevant one in today's business/arts world. It's too"Big Eyes" boasts a wonderful performance by Amy Adams, solid shot work, and bright colours; all letting us see some majesty in Keane's work. The story of Margaret Keane continues to be a relevant one in today's business/arts world. It's too bad, however, that Burton's trademark direction is far better suited for fantasies and the macabre, not for 'based on real events' dramas. The misdirection causes a nasty clash of styles that becomes especially revealing during the horrendously offbeat climax, spearheaded by an increasingly cheesy, over-the-top performance by Christoph Waltz.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

62 Critic Reviews

7.2 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 71 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL