Paramount Pictures | Release Date: August 19, 2016
4.9
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 156 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
57
Mixed:
51
Negative:
48
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
foxgroveSep 8, 2016
Comparisons are odious as propagated by those who suffer from such comparisons, and whilst films like this attempt to remake classics from the golden years it is highly likely that the comparison drawn will be unfavourable to the pretender.Comparisons are odious as propagated by those who suffer from such comparisons, and whilst films like this attempt to remake classics from the golden years it is highly likely that the comparison drawn will be unfavourable to the pretender. The original Ben Hur was a record breaking, Oscar laden epic that employed the old school styles of acting, colour and cheesy special effects with such assured confidence that it almost defied criticism. This Ben Hur invites it, even if ultimately it is not as bad as cynical naysayers would have us believe. The original Judah, Charlton Heston, took the whole thing incredibly seriously turning in an Oscar winning performance which cemented his appeal in this type of sword and sandals pic. I’m afraid that Jack Huston’s lack of screen presence and charisma will not be doing the same for him. His Ben Hur, along with the rest of the cast actually, is one dimensional and colourless complimenting, in fact, the surprisingly drab production values. Director Timur Bekmambetov keeps the camera in close for many scenes which has the effect of dissipating any chance of an epic aura. To add to this the actors’ line delivery is often flat and unconvincing. This adds immeasurably to the amateurish feel that the production can’t seem to dispel for much of its running time. Still, two sequences work very well indeed aided no end by some wonderful camera shots, precise editing and impressive special visual effects. Firstly, the chariot race is good enough, and long enough, to stand favourable comparison to the earlier film and the galley slave scenes are also up to par in their excitement value. Not a complete disaster then, but it is another remake that is as misjudged and second rate as it is unnecessary. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
EpicLadySpongeAug 19, 2016
Remember the previous Ben-Hur films we've seen that was inspired from the book? You get the 1907 short, the 1925 silent feature film, the 1959 award-winning feature film, the 2003 animated film, and now this live-action adaption and guessRemember the previous Ben-Hur films we've seen that was inspired from the book? You get the 1907 short, the 1925 silent feature film, the 1959 award-winning feature film, the 2003 animated film, and now this live-action adaption and guess what they all have in common? They follow the plot from the book with minor differences. One of the differences is that this Ben-Hur is just another plain Ben-Hur for the new generation of people. Just sit back and watch the 1959 award-winning film instead. Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
5
daviddelnorte23Mar 20, 2017
Cuando supe que iban a hacer un remake de 'Ben-Hur' me ilusioné bastante dado que nunca había visto la legendaria cinta original. Además contaba con Jack Huston de protagonista, un actor que me gusta bastante.

Pero muy lejos de esa realidad,
Cuando supe que iban a hacer un remake de 'Ben-Hur' me ilusioné bastante dado que nunca había visto la legendaria cinta original. Además contaba con Jack Huston de protagonista, un actor que me gusta bastante.

Pero muy lejos de esa realidad, Ben-Hur es una película sin alma, aburrida hasta las galeras que apenas cuenta nada y muy moñas... A partir de las galeras, se convierte en una película que a mi al menos me entretuvo y no se me hizo demasiado pesada, alguna aparición esporadica de Jesucristo estaba interesante...

Jack Huston está bien, el problema es SU personaje que es muy muy malo. Morgan Freeman está bien, pero el personaje sale poco... Esta película tiene que meterse mucho más de lleno en el tema de la religión. Y por favor señores de Hollywood, esas bajadas de pantalones con los finales, No. Es vergonzoso el final de esta película.

En definitiva, Ben-Hur, entretenida. Ben-Hur, mala. Ben-Hur, cobarde. Un 5 con generosidad, porque sale Jack Huston
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
PerculaNov 14, 2016
I cannot forgive Ben Hur wearing Jeans but all in all this film is quite acceptable. As for the CGI: It is just the one scene from the trailers - the horse climbing the amphitheatre's ranks - that should have either been improved or simplyI cannot forgive Ben Hur wearing Jeans but all in all this film is quite acceptable. As for the CGI: It is just the one scene from the trailers - the horse climbing the amphitheatre's ranks - that should have either been improved or simply cut from the movie. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
TVJerrySep 7, 2016
In his early career Timur Bekmambetov, directed some wonderfully innovative films (Day Watch, Wanted), so I was hoping this movie's famous chariot race would at least be cool. There were some high-energy moments and a few good crashes, butIn his early career Timur Bekmambetov, directed some wonderfully innovative films (Day Watch, Wanted), so I was hoping this movie's famous chariot race would at least be cool. There were some high-energy moments and a few good crashes, but this scene (and the whole film) just felt lax. This epic follows the conflict of 2 half-brothers in the time of Jesus: one is a Jewish price and the other a Roman. With the exception of the big boat battle, there's little dramatic tension. Ben-Hur's more concerned about emotional engagement than conflict, so we get a heartfelt drama when we want spectacle. It doesn't help that Jack Huston in the titular role lacks the charisma or presence to give it momentum. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TyranianAug 9, 2019
Half as good as the original, not terrible and intermittently enjoyable but fairly average otherwise.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
LeZeeDec 14, 2016
They've grown up together and later turned up to each other.

I had seen the old film and I liked that. So remake means we expect nothing less than a visual spectacular and this film had them at its best, including many more great features,
They've grown up together and later turned up to each other.

I had seen the old film and I liked that. So remake means we expect nothing less than a visual spectacular and this film had them at its best, including many more great features, but the real stars are missing. It was a let down without any notable performances. Besides, the idea of upgrading the story was good, though not everyone going to like that. Particularly the one who loved the old film or the versions.

The length is justified. For the kind of story the film narrates, the pace was very good. So for me this is not a bad flick, but just some key features missing like I said the star value. For the first timers, like today's generation, this film might work, but for the others most probably not. And the end was disappointing, because it felt like watching a Disney film that made for children and families.

I think the director of 'Wanted' did his job as it required. Definitely not an unnecessary remake, but should have been careful in the historic events. Overall, it fell short of depth. You won't feel emotions and/or the character's struggle. In the end it became just an entertainment product and if you expect beyond that, you are only responsible for that. So good luck with the watch if you are yet to give it a try.

5/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
eagleeyevikingMay 31, 2017
While it rushes through many years of Judah's slavery and contains lots of convenient moments, Ben-Hur ultimately delivers it's message of forgiveness and hope through powerful acting, top-notch action, and a condensed version of the 1959 plot.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
badgerryan19May 19, 2017
Lot better than expected, and the movie was competent. The acting for the most part was really good especially Jack Hudson. The movie doesn't really do anything the 1959 one didn't do. It felt like it was missing something though. The actionLot better than expected, and the movie was competent. The acting for the most part was really good especially Jack Hudson. The movie doesn't really do anything the 1959 one didn't do. It felt like it was missing something though. The action scenes where pretty good especially the Ship fight and of course the Chariot scene. Atleast this one didn't end up being another horrible Hollywood remake even though it never should of been made, but it's nothing to ride home about. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
shiftworkerNov 30, 2016
Roman empire drama. The problem with remakes of historical titles for me is that modernisation of attitudes and dialogue makes it harder to accept the different values of a period setting. The lighting, sets and scale all set up the rightRoman empire drama. The problem with remakes of historical titles for me is that modernisation of attitudes and dialogue makes it harder to accept the different values of a period setting. The lighting, sets and scale all set up the right atmosphere, and things improve when Morgan Freeman appears, but I did not find changes made to the plot added credibility. I was left disappointed, just watching another movie rather than becoming involved in a timeless story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
destinyfan1Mar 29, 2017
a fine movie ats it own but broken as the remake of a classic , i mean whole this movie is rushed but enjoineble
As remake 2/10 As seperate movie 8/10
THts why the 5 score Overall pretty good movie but if you think of it, it was totaly
a fine movie ats it own but broken as the remake of a classic , i mean whole this movie is rushed but enjoineble
As remake 2/10 As seperate movie 8/10
THts why the 5 score
Overall pretty good movie but if you think of it, it was totaly different then the classic movie
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Movie3Jul 15, 2018
One of the most unnecessary remakes of all time. Ben-Hur 1959 is like one of the best movies ever and didn't need a remake. And it's sad to say that, cause in it's own right it's actually decent. It has the production value that I wish was inOne of the most unnecessary remakes of all time. Ben-Hur 1959 is like one of the best movies ever and didn't need a remake. And it's sad to say that, cause in it's own right it's actually decent. It has the production value that I wish was in more faith based films and had a good way of telling the story...but the last 15 minutes was completely rushed (stuffing the last hour of story in the original into that span of time) that the turning around/forgiveness pretty much doesn't make sense. Good try...but again, totally unnecessary. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews