Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000

2

grandpajoe6191Oct 6, 2011

"Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000" has everything messed up. The story is messy and disjointed, (with breath-taking slo-mo action popping up in the wrong time every 5 seconds), the dialogue is cheesy and obvious, as well as for the"Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000" has everything messed up. The story is messy and disjointed, (with breath-taking slo-mo action popping up in the wrong time every 5 seconds), the dialogue is cheesy and obvious, as well as for the movie's choppy editing. It sure did deserve a lot of razzies....… Expand

8 of 8 users found this helpful80

All this user's reviews

0

EpicLadySpongeDec 29, 2015

Ugly, dumb, and predictable, Battlefield Earth has shown what it got to deserve the 0 rating. From John Travolta, this is his worst movie he has ever done so far.

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

0

ApocalypseGamerJan 2, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Watch ONLY 3 Minutes of the film. maybe, maybe not. Maybe see how BAD it looks for everyone who likes Sci-Fi film. This is one ofthe WORST movies I've seen.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

Midge115Mar 28, 2012

Umm... No. Just don't do this. Ever. It's Passion of the Christ for Scientology. Don't watch this if you don't want to feel like you are clawing your eyes out with sharpened fingernails made of poop. So just avoid this movie at all costs.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012

The worst film I have ever seen. The writing is absolutely horrible. The acting is very poor. I mean come on, John Travolta and Barry Pepper can be good actors, they deserve better than this crap! But most of all, the film is just downrightThe worst film I have ever seen. The writing is absolutely horrible. The acting is very poor. I mean come on, John Travolta and Barry Pepper can be good actors, they deserve better than this crap! But most of all, the film is just downright ugly. The characters are ugly and the film-making concepts that they used for this film are awful. I mean, why is every shot at a slant? This film just makes no sense whatsoever.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

dante_finnJun 28, 2014

In my opoinion this is the wprst film of all time. The camera angles are annoying and the fuxking scene transitions with the "wipes" is annoying as hell. John Travolta's character is just really stupid and cheesy. The slow motion is **** TheIn my opoinion this is the wprst film of all time. The camera angles are annoying and the fuxking scene transitions with the "wipes" is annoying as hell. John Travolta's character is just really stupid and cheesy. The slow motion is **** The script is really poor with lots of plot holes and the design is just really bad.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

0

Leo9127Jan 20, 2014

Wow, this movie is bad, first John Travolta's acting is so over the top you will die laughing, the cinematography is the worst ever, almost every shot is leaning for some reason, the special effects are crap, and nothing makes sense. This isWow, this movie is bad, first John Travolta's acting is so over the top you will die laughing, the cinematography is the worst ever, almost every shot is leaning for some reason, the special effects are crap, and nothing makes sense. This is one of the worst movies ever.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

2

cabritaMay 6, 2012

This film has so many wholes you could practically see right through it. The performances are so bad and the director was so lost with how to create an action scene. I see why this film won the worst film of the decade at the razzies.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

KadeemluvmusicMar 9, 2012

There are so many reasons why you should avoid Battlefield Earth:

1. Never make a dull and sleazy script from a novel. 2. A film needs more marketing campaigns. 3. Throw it in a landfill in New Mexico. The film is so bad, I will notThere are so many reasons why you should avoid Battlefield Earth:

1. Never make a dull and sleazy script from a novel.
2. A film needs more marketing campaigns.
3. Throw it in a landfill in New Mexico.

The film is so bad, I will not ever rent or buy a bad box office flop again. I think John Travolta needs to learn a couple of lessons from Pulp Fiction because every time when a critic comes to harass you, that's the reason why sci-fi and adventures don't mix. It's still one of the most disgusting movies since Showgirls and The Adventures of Pluto Nash. No sequel, no nothing. Total B.S. "Battlefield Earth" is so bad, I got a good review in a good way.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

Ven-WedeJan 30, 2012

Battlefield Earth can be quite accurately summed up by just describing how John Travolta appears - bloated, clumsy, unintelligent, overbearing, uninteresting, ugly, ridiculous, pathetic... The list could go on, though there is a lot more toBattlefield Earth can be quite accurately summed up by just describing how John Travolta appears - bloated, clumsy, unintelligent, overbearing, uninteresting, ugly, ridiculous, pathetic... The list could go on, though there is a lot more to get to. The plot is mostly cliched, contrived nonsense; the characters look stupid, do stupid things and say stupid things; but where Battlefield Earth fails on such an IMMENSE scale is the direction. Seriously, the direction is ABHORRENT - never has a big-budget Hollywood movie been directed so awfully. The camera is almost permanently stuck on an absurd diagonal, making it very hard to concentrate, and also causing borderline motion sickness. On top of that, the colours and the lighting are so ugly that it almost defies you to continue watching. Every scene is either in this dull and lifeless blue, or a bewildering menagerie of green, yellow and purple. It's just baffling how anyone could look at this steaming pile and find it anything but excruciating! In addition to this abomination of direction is a cast of grossly unappealing actors, including the emotional flatline, Barry Pepper; the half-asleep Forest Whitaker; and of course, the ham and cheese deluxe, John Travolta. All the adjectives in the world fail to even touch on the complete depth of hopelessness that Battlefield Earth exudes in all facets of production. Let it be the saga of the year 2000, so that all will know of the first mistake humankind made in the new millennium.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

TheguyoffireMar 28, 2012

This was a terrible movie. One of the worst movies i've ever seen. Almost as bad as alone in the dark.................................................

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

GagaForGhibliJun 4, 2012

Just No..
Never Will Win A Single Damn Thing..
One Of The Worst Movie's I Have Ever Seen

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

2

HadrianusAug 25, 2012

The worst movie I saw in my life.The second place goes to Lord of the Flies.I do not like the plot of Lord of the flies;but Battlefield Earth has the worst director and the worst actor:John Travolta(only for this movie).

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

GravelordMar 1, 2013

Battlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 is possibly the worst movie of all time, it comes complete with and incomprehensible plot, wooden and cheesy acting (the best kind) and some terrible camera angles. Now if you roll all of theseBattlefield Earth: A Saga of the Year 3000 is possibly the worst movie of all time, it comes complete with and incomprehensible plot, wooden and cheesy acting (the best kind) and some terrible camera angles. Now if you roll all of these aspects together into one little deformed ball you will create the greatest disaster to ever hit the big screen. I would recommend this movie only to people who like to torture their own brain for 90 minutes (like me.)

0/10- Train wreck from Hell… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

mpmartinJul 10, 2013

Horrible, and difficult to watch the entire movie. Once was enough. I don't often have a reason to rate anything this low, but this is one of those times. I can't find anything about this movie that has any redeeming qualities and I like JohnHorrible, and difficult to watch the entire movie. Once was enough. I don't often have a reason to rate anything this low, but this is one of those times. I can't find anything about this movie that has any redeeming qualities and I like John Travolta, just not in this movie. I think as a parody of sci-fi it would have been better!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

FreedomFightersApr 12, 2018

You know your movie's bad when even the unintentional comedy doesn't work.

Honestly, you don't even need to sit through the whole thing to know why it's so bad. Awful story, hammy acting, headache-inducing cinematography, horrific CGI thatYou know your movie's bad when even the unintentional comedy doesn't work.

Honestly, you don't even need to sit through the whole thing to know why it's so bad. Awful story, hammy acting, headache-inducing cinematography, horrific CGI that makes early films look great, everything about it is just wrong. Don't do it. Please. Don't.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

1

SNLover44Mar 1, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Terrible same with every body's acting in this movie AWFUL JUST TERRIBLE IT'S WIERD AND STUPID SO IS THE BOOK this movie should be banned from shelves and HBO! The Screen play acting setting and cinematography department of this movie just made a star wars and star trek rip off IT DESERVED AND WON A LOT OF GOLDEN RASBERRYS AND I SHOULDVE AND IT DID

--- SPOILER BELOW ---

At the end someone blows up travolta's planet the bomb that travolta planted then barry pepper locks travolta up in a sell where he is surrounded by more than a million brick of gold than Forrest Whitaker is behind them gives the gun to pepper turns out he switched sides and than travolta is pissed that he changed sides and that the movie sucked terribly… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

WheelzFourReelzDec 29, 2014

These reviews aren't lying. This is one of the worst excuses for a film I've ever seen. Everything, from the acting to the costumes to the special effects to the story to the script to the plot holes to the action to the cinematography to theThese reviews aren't lying. This is one of the worst excuses for a film I've ever seen. Everything, from the acting to the costumes to the special effects to the story to the script to the plot holes to the action to the cinematography to the lighting, just sucks. This is the worst movie I've ever seen.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

gameguardian21Mar 24, 2016

Battlefield earth now has another battle to deal with, keeping fans interested as this movie has bad dialogue, story, effects, characters, this is one of those huge messed up movies.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

The3AcademySinsSep 12, 2019

This is a movie that disgusted me to my very core. At the same time, the messy, awful, hodge-podge story is nothing short of unintentional comedy genius.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

JPKDec 8, 2019

Hilariously Awful
This is truly one of the worst movies ever made. But at the same time, It’s so f*cking funny.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

BeastJ18Apr 23, 2018

This has got to be the worst film ever in comparison to how much it cost. Everything about this movie is a hideous and illogical mess. It is by far the most painful movie experience I have ever had. While there are some other movies are justThis has got to be the worst film ever in comparison to how much it cost. Everything about this movie is a hideous and illogical mess. It is by far the most painful movie experience I have ever had. While there are some other movies are just as bad, they are more enjoyable because of their inadequacies. This was just a long, boring, ugly and relentless assault on the eyes and ears.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

MattJacks2003Mar 9, 2019

This is the most watched movie since Star Wars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

Steven1981Mar 14, 2020

I saw a bit of this years ago, not the entire film but enough to see it was boring. Finally having watched Battlefield Earth in full I can honestly say this is John Travolta's worst film along with Face/Off and Broken Arrow. Battlefield EarthI saw a bit of this years ago, not the entire film but enough to see it was boring. Finally having watched Battlefield Earth in full I can honestly say this is John Travolta's worst film along with Face/Off and Broken Arrow. Battlefield Earth is slow, the humour is awful, the explosion scenes are okay but besides that the action is awful. No story, and no character development and it looks depressing. Poor acting and it made zero sense.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

SoulmanApr 3, 2007

Well... the film is bad. BUT it is not that bad then I thought after reading all the critics. Or maybe it's only not so bad because it is some sort of fun to see such a bad film. I had a good time!

4 of 5 users found this helpful

4

LeifOct 5, 2013

A bizarre ugly film with bizarre ugly characters. The ridiculousness of the story and the fact we have never seen anything like this weird mash-up of alien finance, blackmail, and uninspired Planet of The Apes derivative keeps it oddlyA bizarre ugly film with bizarre ugly characters. The ridiculousness of the story and the fact we have never seen anything like this weird mash-up of alien finance, blackmail, and uninspired Planet of The Apes derivative keeps it oddly entertaining. Travolta overacts to an obscene amount and stumbles around in a strange but intriguing moon boots and dreadlocks combo and makes the film watchable for his odd performance that certainly doesn't lack in conviction, he wants to do this movie and that adds to it even though it is messy schlock poorly directed by Roger Christian who never met a color filter he didn't like.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

python2000Sep 10, 2013

Perhaps not as bad as most make it out to be. But still a bad film. Battlefield Earth fails at keeping the viewer entertained because of it's run time which is 30 minutes too long. It fails at building up suspense and tension, when thePerhaps not as bad as most make it out to be. But still a bad film. Battlefield Earth fails at keeping the viewer entertained because of it's run time which is 30 minutes too long. It fails at building up suspense and tension, when the characters were in danger I wanted them to die. It fails at being an acceptable science fiction movie because of it's bad special effects. The only thing it doesn't fail at is having a good portrayal of Terl. John Travolta (surprisingly) is the best thing about the movie and delivers a good performance. Overall Battlefield Earth is a stupid Star Wars wannabe which doesn't seem to have any plot.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

bfoore90Sep 8, 2017

Battlefield Earth is the mother of all bad movies. If Cigarettes can have messages informing customers that they can die from it then I feel like they should have put that same warning on the tickets when this movie was released.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Hemp316Oct 5, 2015

Extremely underrated and overlooked.I think the main complaint of the Movie is that the Movie is based off A work from L. Ron Hubbard who invented Scientology and John Travolta being A Scientologist starring in the Movie.The Acting wasExtremely underrated and overlooked.I think the main complaint of the Movie is that the Movie is based off A work from L. Ron Hubbard who invented Scientology and John Travolta being A Scientologist starring in the Movie.The Acting was nothing special,but was fine.The story is actually really intriguing and overall it was A great film who's really only tarnished by people scoring it so low which is the same and again I believe it is because of the Scientologist part.Maybe if people would get over that then they could truly see the Movie without blinders on.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

amf32Jul 28, 2014

This film had me rock hard from start to finish. John Travolta has never played a more convincing role; I think he really explored the roots of his own life in this motion picture.

The ending was simply "golden"

7 of 23 users found this helpful716

All this user's reviews

5

georgeNov 4, 2008

After all the brutal reviews I expected BE to be the next Plan 9 on a big budget. Derivative, absolutely - and that's really its worst problem: for all the money and hoopla it looks and sounds like every other sci-fi schlocker, right After all the brutal reviews I expected BE to be the next Plan 9 on a big budget. Derivative, absolutely - and that's really its worst problem: for all the money and hoopla it looks and sounds like every other sci-fi schlocker, right down to the lighting, sound fx, etc; Travolta should never have cast himself in the lead - he's TRAVOLTA, and you can't get past that; at least duds like DUNE tried to create something visually unique. But hey, I've also defended ISHTAR - another movie undeserving of such universal derision; bad? Yep; the WORST? Not even close; if you're looking for TRUE PAIN then test yourself with Roberto B's PINOCCHIO.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful

10

TomC.Mar 28, 2007

This film is great. You must be a psychiatrist or on medication if you hate this film. My buddy Jon Travolta does an excellent job portraying Bob Marley. I can't wait to show it to Suri when IT takes over and our Xenu comes back. This film is great. You must be a psychiatrist or on medication if you hate this film. My buddy Jon Travolta does an excellent job portraying Bob Marley. I can't wait to show it to Suri when IT takes over and our Xenu comes back. Haven't you all suspected? THIS film is how I converted Katie. I assure you, watch this film and your E-Meter will be off the chart. Just pay 400 thousand dollars to the only true religion and 5 bucks to your local secular video store and you too can be a scientologist! Thanks for your time, and Viacom, f.ck off! I'm fine without you!… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful

10

DavidD.May 21, 2007

Best bilingual scifi movie of all time In a country where bilingual English/Spanish signage is scoffed at by the illiterate provincial masses, I don't expect a movie as brilliantly bilingual as BattleField Earth to have been embraced. Best bilingual scifi movie of all time In a country where bilingual English/Spanish signage is scoffed at by the illiterate provincial masses, I don't expect a movie as brilliantly bilingual as BattleField Earth to have been embraced. Just as I am ahead of my times for my ability to speak Chinese, so BattleField Earth is ahead of its time in presenting the inhabitants of Psyclo as non-native English speakers who need to tech their enemy their language before they can communicate with him. That aspect was misunderstood by the uni-lingual American masses. In a world where only 7% of the people speak English as their native language, I find it insulting to see SciFi movies where Romulans and Naboo-ians speak perfect English. The "cultural elite" often praise themselves on watching foreign films with subtitles, yet the same people scoff at the best bilingual scifi movie of all times - BattleField Earth. BattleField Earth gets 2 thumbs up from this critic.… Expand

1 of 10 users found this helpful

9

MikeFeb 5, 2006

I was expecting it to be different having read the book. I thought it was not bad at all , i don't follow critics opinions, especially were sci fi is concerned. a worse piece of crap was hitchikers guide to the galaxy but you don't I was expecting it to be different having read the book. I thought it was not bad at all , i don't follow critics opinions, especially were sci fi is concerned. a worse piece of crap was hitchikers guide to the galaxy but you don't hear nothing about it, or Vin disel's attempt at sci fi. that moovie sucked so much i forgot the name.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful

6

DetoxE.Apr 6, 2009

I have watched this movie several times. I enjoyed watching it. The Alien race is very interesting. The whole movie is somewhat different from the normal Hollywood output. May be not better but at least different! So it is not a very good I have watched this movie several times. I enjoyed watching it. The Alien race is very interesting. The whole movie is somewhat different from the normal Hollywood output. May be not better but at least different! So it is not a very good movie but it is worth watching if one likes the genre.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful

5

TitaniumDragonJul 21, 2009

This movie IS terrible, but it crosses the line from "its awful" to "its so bad its good". It is completely ridiculous, but it is actually quite watchable so long as you laugh at it. There are definitely, definitely worse movies.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

6

RickB.Sep 17, 2005

Not all bad just alittle not very good. I will say i have seen worse.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

7

YossarianJan 25, 2006

A very funny comedy with two of the funniest performances and two of the funniest characters I've seen from either John Travolta or Forrest Whitaker. What? It wasn't supposed to be a comedy? Too bad. It is what it is. I laughed A very funny comedy with two of the funniest performances and two of the funniest characters I've seen from either John Travolta or Forrest Whitaker. What? It wasn't supposed to be a comedy? Too bad. It is what it is. I laughed myself silly!… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

5

JBAug 11, 2006

A generic sci-fi action flick that honestly isn't worth the cost of admission. It's not nearly as bad as some of the other films at this rating level though.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

VinnyB.Mar 1, 2007

Far ahead of its time, "Battlefield Earth" was never recognized for the masterpiece allegory that it is. The aliens in this movie are thinly veiled versions of Scientology proselytizers, and their adventures on planet Earth focus on the Far ahead of its time, "Battlefield Earth" was never recognized for the masterpiece allegory that it is. The aliens in this movie are thinly veiled versions of Scientology proselytizers, and their adventures on planet Earth focus on the misunderstandings that often occur between members of the church and the general public. Travolta's character is an unsubtle archetype of every Hubbard-worshiping movie star that has come before him - his natty dreads and over-the-top delivery an uncanny riff on Tom Cruise's performance in "Born on the Fourth of July." His large bulk and space-faring ways can not fail to invoke memories of Kirstie Alley in a far inferior sci-fi flick, "Star Trek II." Indeed, the film makes a case for L. Ron Hubbard as the supreme pop culture Sci-Fi guru of our time, not the overrated Gene Roddenberry. Indeed, "Battlefield Earth" may very well be viewed in the year 3000 much as we look back on near-forgotten masterpieces like "The Inferno" and "King Lear." Watch for Will Smith's brief but hilarious cameo as a Bible salesmen. Other Scientologists making brief cameos include Tom Hanks, Bea Arthur, the kid from "Jerry Maguire," and Fred "The Hammer" Williamson.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful

4

WWABTT123Sep 8, 2010

Before I watched this, I thought it would be good for the audiences around the world but when i watched it, I feel disappointed for this movie and also wasted my money for watching this crap

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

DamienDarko777May 7, 2011

This movie isn't nearly as bad as all that. Sure, it's a bit cheesy but I liked the characters. I think it's done purposely with tongue in cheek, not meant to be a SERIOUS sci-fi but just a fun adventure; Sort of the same way how the IndianaThis movie isn't nearly as bad as all that. Sure, it's a bit cheesy but I liked the characters. I think it's done purposely with tongue in cheek, not meant to be a SERIOUS sci-fi but just a fun adventure; Sort of the same way how the Indiana Jones movies were inspired by those old serial shorts. It has pretty good fx and the actors are clearly into it. The story is cool though unoriginal, but I rooted for the humans to rise up against their alien masters. Don't over-think it, you'll have some fun. Ignore the haters, they just go for the obvious cheap shots. If you like sci-fi adventures, then you could do much worse.… Expand

0 of 9 users found this helpful09

All this user's reviews

4

MattMintageJul 26, 2011

You know what, even with the crummy camera-angles and John Travolta as an intergalactic space commander...thing...it wasn't bad to look at it's colorful scenes and comfy science-fiction action. But still...it is an interesting film that evenYou know what, even with the crummy camera-angles and John Travolta as an intergalactic space commander...thing...it wasn't bad to look at it's colorful scenes and comfy science-fiction action. But still...it is an interesting film that even though is said to be the worst, will still have people talking eons to come.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

4

13freedom13Jan 6, 2020

this is an awesome movie i can't understand why people don't like this it takes place in the 3000 for crying out loud

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

StephenC.May 8, 2008

Better than I thought it was going to be and I can still only give it a 2. It's shamelessly pandering to the same people that Scientology does, the not so smart segment of the population. Besides being a not very good sci-fi story in Better than I thought it was going to be and I can still only give it a 2. It's shamelessly pandering to the same people that Scientology does, the not so smart segment of the population. Besides being a not very good sci-fi story in the first place it is also a bad adaptation of a bad story that is badly acted and badly directed. The best thing I can say is some of the acting is so bad it's laughable, especially Mr. Travolta.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JohnD.Jul 6, 2008

Not one character was appealing. I enjoy science fiction a great deal but this reminds me why 99% of the time the movies are never done correctly or are able to be funded. Any made for tv movie would have been much better because at least Not one character was appealing. I enjoy science fiction a great deal but this reminds me why 99% of the time the movies are never done correctly or are able to be funded. Any made for tv movie would have been much better because at least you could blame a lack of funding, but this fails on such a large scale that its imeasurable. Never thought Id ever feel sorry for an actor before but Travolta this was just sad. Its his own fault though.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

SamNov 20, 2005

It's far from the worst movie I've ever seen, but it's not very good either. I really thought the plot gave it pottential, but the lame effects and acting really ruined it. There are, however, two things that I DID enjoy about It's far from the worst movie I've ever seen, but it's not very good either. I really thought the plot gave it pottential, but the lame effects and acting really ruined it. There are, however, two things that I DID enjoy about this move. As I said before, the plot was interesting and I really enjoyed Travolta's performance. Other than that, I will admit that this is a true, honest-to-God disaster.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

SkeetM.Aug 26, 2005

I've seen many great movies and many bad ones, but this is easily the worst all around flick i have watched. by far. from dialogue to plot to scenery to tone to setting to costum design. it is bad beyond comprehension from start to I've seen many great movies and many bad ones, but this is easily the worst all around flick i have watched. by far. from dialogue to plot to scenery to tone to setting to costum design. it is bad beyond comprehension from start to finish. and in no way am i guilty of exaggeration.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AndrésM.Jul 6, 2006

Horrible and completely stupid. I´d rather use the time to stare at a rotten banana.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

NickASep 16, 2006

Sometimes you feel you have to watch something to see if its as bad as everyone said! I did and it

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AnonApr 7, 2008

The most clichéd science fiction piece I have ever witnessed. Absolutely terribly written and the acting inspired no emotional reaction.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

LaurenJan 20, 2009

It's so bad, it's not even funny. Who gave this movie the green light? I would like to know, cause' they need to re-evaluate their jobs.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

JasonS.Dec 3, 2006

Almost as bad as 'The Lake House' :-)

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

A.NoteFeb 27, 2007

Every scene in the movie is flooded in either vomit orange, deep purple, or baby poop green. Seriously.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

NathanT.Mar 8, 2007

The hype is accurate! "Battlefield Earth" is one of, if not the worst film in the history of mankind. Ugly, stupid, repulsive, and disturbing in a manner not seen, since, well, the era of L. Ron Hubbard's crummy derivative writing and The hype is accurate! "Battlefield Earth" is one of, if not the worst film in the history of mankind. Ugly, stupid, repulsive, and disturbing in a manner not seen, since, well, the era of L. Ron Hubbard's crummy derivative writing and scam of a religion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

DaleH.Apr 11, 2007

This movie was so bad it was amazing that the stars accepted these roles, in two weeks time the primitive people know how to fly fighter jets? It also moved way too fast and was so stupid how the tryed to talk, piece of crap movie, This movie was so bad it was amazing that the stars accepted these roles, in two weeks time the primitive people know how to fly fighter jets? It also moved way too fast and was so stupid how the tryed to talk, piece of crap movie, don't waste your time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

BenE.Aug 15, 2008

This is possibly the worst movie ever made, but perhaps slightly better than Ben & Arthur.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

kidblockAug 20, 2008

Geez why people give this a higher rating which means they should be put into a mental institution if they like this film. Cause this movie sucks as hell because if poor plot and poor effects in this film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

RogerD.Jul 16, 2001

I've seen worse, just can't remember when.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AlanN.Oct 12, 2006

So bad it's funny.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

slaying_spudMar 4, 2011

Ha ha!!!! I get it now! after watching this overacted, non-linear, headache inspiring film, I get that all the good reviews in this section must be sarcastic! Very good jokes you guys! If you want to see a movie that is so bad that youHa ha!!!! I get it now! after watching this overacted, non-linear, headache inspiring film, I get that all the good reviews in this section must be sarcastic! Very good jokes you guys! If you want to see a movie that is so bad that you can't watch it without a constant headache, then by all means, burn through a few hours of your life with this empty soda can that cost 75 million dollars to make.… Expand