Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Bad Education (2020)

6

TVJerryApr 28, 2020

This is based on the true story of a Long Island school superintendent (Hugh Jackman) and his assistant (Allison Janney), who embezzled millions from their system. This narrative slowly unravels their exposure, while offering an interestingThis is based on the true story of a Long Island school superintendent (Hugh Jackman) and his assistant (Allison Janney), who embezzled millions from their system. This narrative slowly unravels their exposure, while offering an interesting character study for Jackman. Ultimately, the writing and direction don't explore new ways of telling this "white collar criminal" story, which has been told before. It's interesting to see how a crime this astounding can happen and that's where this film (and Jackman's performance) is most compelling. Otherwise, it's not especially riveting, but a fascinating exploration of this criminal endeavor and the people around it.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

6

MarkHReviewsApr 28, 2020

With 2017’s “Thoroughbreds,” Director Cory Finley announced that he has a fresh perspective and a gift for dark comedy that make him a new face well worth following. It’s because of that promise, in part, that “Bad Education” seems soWith 2017’s “Thoroughbreds,” Director Cory Finley announced that he has a fresh perspective and a gift for dark comedy that make him a new face well worth following. It’s because of that promise, in part, that “Bad Education” seems so disappointing.

This film follows the true story of school superintendent Frank Tassone (Hugh Jackman) and his associate Pam Gluckin (Allison Janney). Over a period of years, the pair turned the Roslyn School District in Long Island, New York, into their personal piggy bank. Overall, $11.2 million went missing, the largest theft from a school district in American history. Screenwriter Mike Makowsky attended Roslyn High School in the years following this story’s unraveling and personally observed the consequences.

One of the fascinating quirks is that the fraud and embezzlement were not discovered by professional journalists but by a group of reporters from the student newspaper. In the film, this student-led effort is personified as a single character, Rachel Bhargava (Geraldine Viswanathan).

This story offers a rich vein of material for a dark comedy, a quirky character study or both. Frank Tassone was revered for bringing the school district to national prominence. He fended off the advances of the district’s more voracious ex-wives by claiming that the death of a wife many years ago was still “too fresh.” In reality, Tassone had at least two male partners. One he ensconced in a Park Avenue apartment. The other was a 32-year-old male dancer in Las Vegas. A fastidious dresser, Tassone justified his $30,000 expenditure for dry cleaning by explaining patiently that the expenses took place “over a period of years.” As the noose begins to tighten, so does Frank’s face, thanks to a district-funded visit to a cosmetic surgeon.

Finley and Makowsky take little advantage of this wealth of material. While Jackman and Janney are powerful in their respective roles, Act One is very slow-moving. What’s unpardonable is that there’s no meaningful exploration of these characters, who are practically begging to be better understood. There’s the intimation that school personnel may resent the sense of entitlement of the wealthy families in the school district. There’s the suggestion that this was all a slippery slope that began when a $20 sandwich ended up on the district’s credit card by mistake. But the viewer is left mystified about why these people did what they did (character development, anyone?).

There are some laugh-out-loud moments along the way. After being confronted with her crimes, Janney’s character tearfully says, “I’m ashamed of my actions. I’m ashamed of myself… There’s no excuse for it.” To which Ray Romano’s school board chair replies earnestly, “Well… the sociopathy.”

If this film were a high school essay, it would have been returned for lack of analytical thought.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

DudeManGuyMay 4, 2020

Incredibly straightforward. Good performances make it worth finishing, but there's nothing surprising or revelatory about the plot or character arcs. If you have an interest in spending 2 hours watching criminals get caught being criminals,Incredibly straightforward. Good performances make it worth finishing, but there's nothing surprising or revelatory about the plot or character arcs. If you have an interest in spending 2 hours watching criminals get caught being criminals, well then good news: this is the movie for you.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

DeanomiteApr 27, 2020

this was interesting more than it was good. the reality of embezzlement is what will likely destroy our nation (look at Trump), and so the story is interesting. However, given the talent involved, the performances were stilted.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

JLuis_001Apr 30, 2020

The film walks a fine line between satire and drama when addressing its theme but manages to balance it in a good way, above all avoiding turning its characters into clichés or monsters, after all, their motives are simple: greed andThe film walks a fine line between satire and drama when addressing its theme but manages to balance it in a good way, above all avoiding turning its characters into clichés or monsters, after all, their motives are simple: greed and entitlement and it's because when the money is within reach, the corrupt will always exist and they will always have their excuses rooted in those precise topics, greed and entitlement.

This is indeed a small film that stands out with the help of Hugh Jackman and Allison Janney's names and of course it's more solid because of them. And while there's barely anything new to learn from a story like this. Bad Education is as a matter of fact a pretty entertaining film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

lvmnzApr 26, 2020

Hugh Jackman is great. Highly entertaining and introspective film about the central figures in a shocking scandal.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

OlivierPielMay 5, 2020

It's a solid and competent entertainment, but quite a banal story. HBO going Netflix's way into peddling bland, safe, mindless distraction for the middle-classes.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

jodyjayApr 27, 2020

Loved Jackman, Janney and the young lady reporter. Great acting. Apparently, the film took some license, but from what I understand, most of it accurately tracked the scandal that took place in my school district some 20+ years after ILoved Jackman, Janney and the young lady reporter. Great acting. Apparently, the film took some license, but from what I understand, most of it accurately tracked the scandal that took place in my school district some 20+ years after I graduated from the high school.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

KazeemApr 27, 2020

My Best movie ever, My love for this movie is extremely high
I rate it 10/10

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

Brent_MarchantMar 7, 2021

Despite a slow opening, this fact-based tale about the largest school funding embezzlement case in US history manages to get on track about 30 minutes in and runs with it from there to its gripping conclusion. Director Cory Finley's secondDespite a slow opening, this fact-based tale about the largest school funding embezzlement case in US history manages to get on track about 30 minutes in and runs with it from there to its gripping conclusion. Director Cory Finley's second outing, a made-for-cable offering nominated for an Independent Spirit Award for best screenplay, features strong performances by Allison Janney, Ray Romano and Hugh Jackman (easily a career best) in bringing the material to life with snappy wit, unbridled guile, and the well-honed, carefully camouflaged skills of slick sociopaths. While the picture's overall tone could use a better balance in its mix of comedy and drama, more back story, and improved handling of some of its ancillary story threads, this production nevertheless delivers the goods, providing viewers with a solidly entertaining package.… Expand