Lions Gate Films | Release Date: April 14, 2000
8.6
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1155 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,032
Mixed:
96
Negative:
27
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
2
SlyEnemyOct 12, 2008
In comparison to the book, it contains none of the subvertive text (How would it?) that is necessary for the characters and "storyline" to grip onto. Without reading between the lines, we're left with a pointless story about a pointless In comparison to the book, it contains none of the subvertive text (How would it?) that is necessary for the characters and "storyline" to grip onto. Without reading between the lines, we're left with a pointless story about a pointless man doing pointless things - A film which Withnail and I did many moons ago, without the grotesque and (film wise) unnecessary gore. Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful
0
SNXLFeb 28, 2022
KKKKKKKKK vtnc que filme ruim, não acredito que criei tanto hype pra essa bomba
0 of 14 users found this helpful014
All this user's reviews
2
siggi104Jul 8, 2022
This gotta be a parody. There is no way this is an actual movie. I don't believe it. If I'd be to see this as a comedic thriller I would give it a way higher score.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
0
johnnyboy53Jan 21, 2023
This movie was a complete waste of time and brain cells. The acting was wooden, the story was weak, and the supposed 'satire' fell flat. I can only assume the filmmakers were trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator with this trash.This movie was a complete waste of time and brain cells. The acting was wooden, the story was weak, and the supposed 'satire' fell flat. I can only assume the filmmakers were trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator with this trash. Save yourself the agony and don't bother with this cinematic abortion. Zero out of ten, and that's only because I can't give negative numbers. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews