Ad Astra

5

Jonah5Nov 22, 2019

Good effects but the plot of looking for his father becomes a pointless story.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

mrc_brnNov 18, 2019

While pretty, in the end I felt slightly deflated. 'All that for such a .. basic message in the end?'. Well crafted, well acted and like I said, pretty images throughout. But ultimately only a so-so experience as far as I'm concerned.While pretty, in the end I felt slightly deflated. 'All that for such a .. basic message in the end?'. Well crafted, well acted and like I said, pretty images throughout. But ultimately only a so-so experience as far as I'm concerned. Expected more substance than what I felt left with exiting the cinema.… Expand

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

8

RobloxManNov 4, 2019

This astronaut movie starring Brad Pitt is a overall an interesting movie. Although it seems like there's too much build up for an unrewarding ending, the visuals are fantastic. I've never seen since Interstellar such realism to what its likeThis astronaut movie starring Brad Pitt is a overall an interesting movie. Although it seems like there's too much build up for an unrewarding ending, the visuals are fantastic. I've never seen since Interstellar such realism to what its like on another planet or moon. Although I feel the ending of this movie was sort of a let down, it tells a good story about a man just trying to find out what happened to his dad and realizes there similarities on the way.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

AverycrosslinNov 3, 2019

Brad Pitt gives an excellent performance in Ad Astra, where he travels across the solar system to find his father. I fricking loved this movie, everything about it is good. It has awesome acting, amazing space travel, thrilling action, and aBrad Pitt gives an excellent performance in Ad Astra, where he travels across the solar system to find his father. I fricking loved this movie, everything about it is good. It has awesome acting, amazing space travel, thrilling action, and a great score. This is one of the best sci-fi movies of the year. I don't understand why some people don't like it. Awesome movie! 10/10 or A+… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

WpgTrinimanNov 2, 2019

A slow burn, not an action film, despite a few action scenes. Rewarding for those with patience, but not a mainstream crowd-pleaser.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

DominArsenOct 27, 2019

A new movie about "Mars" and the surroundings. A long one .. This film is magic. I liked the moon, which is only a stopover for the other planets? Here Mars! The battle without real objective is a pity, but very well done. The special effectsA new movie about "Mars" and the surroundings. A long one .. This film is magic. I liked the moon, which is only a stopover for the other planets? Here Mars! The battle without real objective is a pity, but very well done. The special effects are magical because you believe in them from start to finish. A story about the loneliness of a man to join his father who had taken the path of loneliness earlier than him. And an experience feedback at the end of the film draws our own story!

Un nouveau film pour sujet "Mars" et les alentours. Un peut long.. Ce film est magique. J'ai aimé la lune qui n'est qu'une escale pour les autres planètes ? Ici Mars ! La bataille sans réel objectif est dommage, mais très bien réalisée. Les effets spéciaux sont magiques, car on y croit de bout en bout. Une histoire sur la Solitude d'un Homme devant rejoindre son père ayant pris le chemin de la solitude plus tôt que lui. Et un retour d'expérience en fin de film vous dessine notre propre histoire !… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

JazzyChanOct 26, 2019

I don't understand how the critics mark this so high. "Pitt's best performance" "A well made provocative movie" "superb suspense sequences" "A rare nuances story-telling". Are those guys still seeing the movies they talk about or they justI don't understand how the critics mark this so high. "Pitt's best performance" "A well made provocative movie" "superb suspense sequences" "A rare nuances story-telling". Are those guys still seeing the movies they talk about or they just write papers on it like ****ing robots? I don't think this is a bad movie but, come on, it isn't that great.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

7footjesusOct 25, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This was a beautiful film with great acting. I love the feel and tone. The climax was terrible for me. Heavy-handed and preachy. The first thing I said about this film out loud was, "I am profoundly disappointed." I prayed there would be an ambiguous ending, but nope. They hit you over the head with the "message." Human connection is neat. Got it, thanks.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

LajaleaaOct 25, 2019

"I should feel something."
.
( 73/100 ) . "Ad Astra" es un puro muy duro de fumar, pero también uno muy elegante. Fuera de las influencias que carga la película, se nota la poderosa mano de Hoyte Van Hoytema y su intención por exponer su"I should feel something."
.
( 73/100 )
.
"Ad Astra" es un puro muy duro de fumar, pero también uno muy elegante. Fuera de las influencias que carga la película, se nota la poderosa mano de Hoyte Van Hoytema y su intención por exponer su parte del proyecto de forma integra y pulcra. Hoytema es un erudito capaz de fotografiar y visualizar paisajes interestelares que muy pocos en este planeta podrían imaginar. Ese es el deleite más grande del film. Cuando se trata de observar el panorama, contemplar la distancia y los elementos que conforman las capas visuales como el color y la arquitectura, "Ad Astra" es un gran éxito. Pero hay un gran "pero". El guión, escrito por Gray, desmorona todo potencial en el film. La esencia de la película sonda entre el viaje de Roy en busca de su padre, su propia concepción de la vida y la obsesión del padre con la vida extraterrestre. El guión le da demasiado existencialismo a la voz de Roy y mucho peso a la obsesión del padre. Roy es una persona tan dominada por la pesades de la soledad que su narrativa se vuelve repetitiva y arrastra al público a un eterno discurso de "¿Quien soy y porque no siento nada?" hasta un punto de tedio. Por otro lado, la obsesión del padre es absurda e irracional, y aunque ciertas actitudes se justifican durante el viaje, simplemente agregan monotonía a las escenas que tanto trabajo le costó idear a Hoytema. En ese aspecto, me entristece decir que no hubo un impulso importante de actuación en el film. Es evidente que Brad Pitt comprime su actuación para lograr al personaje, y cuando se esfuerza por romper su propio casco, es muy poco el merito que se le puede dar a un par de lagrimas que no logra retener. Ni Tommy Lee Jones o los 5 minutos en los que sale Ruth Negga aportan en la dramática. Fuera de lo visual, "Ad Astra" es una intención más de generar reflexión en un público que ha visto a gente perderse y encontrarse a sí misma de formas más razonables. Creo que el error de James Gray fue contar la vida de un hombre que no la vivía.
-
"Ad Astra" is a cigarette hard to smoke but is also an elegant one. Independently the influences that the movie has, it can be noticed the powerful hand of Hoyte Van Hoytema and the intention of presenting his part of the project with integrity and neatness. Hoytema is an erudite capable of picturing and visualizing interstellar landscapes that very few on this planet could imagine. That is the biggest delight of the movie. When it's about observing the panorama, contemplating the distance and the elements that have the visual layers such as the color and the architecture, "Ad Astra" is a great success. But there is a big obstacle. The scrip, written by Gray, crumbles all the potential in the film. The essence of the movie probes between Roy’s journey in search of his father, his conception of life and the obsession of the father with extraterrestrial life. The scrip gives too much existentialism to the voice of Roy and a lot of weight to the father's obsession. Roy is someone so overwhelmed by the heaviness of his loneliness that his narrative becomes repetitive and drags the public into a never-ending speech of "Who Am I and Why I Can't Feel Something?" to a point of tedium. On the other side, the father's obsessions are absurd and irrational, and even when some behaviors are justified while the journey, they simply add monotony to the scenes that Hoytema worked so hard to idealize. In that aspect, I'm sad to say that there was not an important impulse of acting in the movie. It is evident that Brad Pitt compress his own acting to achieve the character, and when he tries to break his own helmet, the merit that can be given to the few tears that he couldn't hold in is too little. Not even Tommy Lee Jones or the five minutes on the screen of Ruth Negga add something to the dramatic. Taking the visuals out, "Ad Astra" is one more intention of promoting reflection in a public that has seen characters getting lost and finding themselves in more reasonable ways. I believe that James Gray's mistake was telling about the life of a man who was not living it.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

sassymahOct 25, 2019

Ad Astra is an art film set in space. It is about a man's existential crisis via the lens of an attachment issue to his father. I can't elaborate more on the plot without revealing spoilers. Brad Pitt gives an understated and impressiveAd Astra is an art film set in space. It is about a man's existential crisis via the lens of an attachment issue to his father. I can't elaborate more on the plot without revealing spoilers. Brad Pitt gives an understated and impressive performance here that I found riveting. Most actors wouldn't be able to pull off an effective performance with such an abstract plot in a minimalist movie. James Gray is a genius. The cinematography is beautiful and the original score is haunting. This is the Space Odyssey of our generation. It is a very compelling movie.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

2

lostkid0Oct 23, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A meandering movie that does nothing interesting. It tries to come off as artistic but in the end is just a two hour long ode to someone's desire to punch their absentee father. The physics make no sense, and neither does the plot. Forgettable, unrealistic, pointless. You are better off skipping this film. A waste of Brad Pitt and Tommy Lee jones.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

GuilhermeCursiOct 20, 2019

Nem mesmo o talento de Brad Pitt pode salvar Ad Astra filme cansativo, com um direção ruim e filme só se destaca em seus efeitos visuais

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

JumpCut_OnlineOct 20, 2019

Ad Astra, through its inherent intelligence and cerebral nature, might not cater to a mainstream audience. It’s a slow burner, favouring a sedately-paced 121-minute runtime to explore the fragility of the human condition, but that is not toAd Astra, through its inherent intelligence and cerebral nature, might not cater to a mainstream audience. It’s a slow burner, favouring a sedately-paced 121-minute runtime to explore the fragility of the human condition, but that is not to say it lacks entertainment. There are a handful of truly exhilarating set-pieces set against the backdrop of planet-to-planet travel, filled with moments of true horror and simultaneous exuberance. Gray’s odyssey is a member of a rare coterie of intellectual science-fiction movies that exist to challenge the parameters of the genre it finds itself in; to be intelligent and also offer spectacle. It may not be for everyone, but by God is it an experience to remember.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

ArgonautOct 20, 2019

This is a cerebral hard science fiction film. For the fans of 2001, Blade Runner (both), Interstellar, Arrival, and Annihilation. Most likely not for the kids who grew up watching Marvel / DC stuff and cannot bear the pace of classicThis is a cerebral hard science fiction film. For the fans of 2001, Blade Runner (both), Interstellar, Arrival, and Annihilation. Most likely not for the kids who grew up watching Marvel / DC stuff and cannot bear the pace of classic film-making. As a kid who grew up on hard sci-fi novels and an admirer of classic cinema, I have enjoyed it a lot.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

moviecritic68Oct 17, 2019

I'm guilty of not heeding the reviews of fellow critics I have followed in the past. I actually dozed off twice in my seat. Not one of Pitt's & Jones's better roles. Good enough to stay out of the red but a bitter disappointment to someoneI'm guilty of not heeding the reviews of fellow critics I have followed in the past. I actually dozed off twice in my seat. Not one of Pitt's & Jones's better roles. Good enough to stay out of the red but a bitter disappointment to someone who loves science fiction & space films.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

Emanuel44Oct 16, 2019

Amazing cinematography, outstanding performance of Brad Pitt, a bit over-explained at times but very good over-all

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

9

hugoferreiraOct 16, 2019

This film is a humane essay mascaraed as a sci-fi, space exploration movie. It's a character film which touches the human condition itself. This film is a dissertation on the human condition, on the impact of loneliness in a person, on theThis film is a humane essay mascaraed as a sci-fi, space exploration movie. It's a character film which touches the human condition itself. This film is a dissertation on the human condition, on the impact of loneliness in a person, on the scars parents leave in a son/daughter, on how it influences one selves choices, on redemption itself and how we should let go something the pulls us down and embrace what pulls us up, on how we shouldn't search for answers on others but within ourselves and at the same time help each others carry our burdens. It's an heavy film filled with symbolism and metaphors, that uses the sci-fi and space exploration genre to ease the topic into the audience. Masterfully directed with an outstanding Brad Pitt performance lifting him up to the top. A must see film, Ad Astra - "To the Stars". Enjoy it.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

4

DarthNihilusOct 14, 2019

I love a good space movie as much as the next person and I'm also a Brad Pitt fan so when this movie was announced it seemed like a no brainer that it would be good. Unfortunately that was not the case. The slow pacing of the film makesI love a good space movie as much as the next person and I'm also a Brad Pitt fan so when this movie was announced it seemed like a no brainer that it would be good. Unfortunately that was not the case. The slow pacing of the film makes boredom set in very quickly. Also the confused tone of the film is another hard pill to swallow. Throughout the entire movie I had the feeling of anticipation. I was waiting for something interesting to happen to take the movie to the next step and validate my expectations but that never happened. The film seems like it wants to convey a messag but isn't quite sure what it should say. By the end of the film, you get the sense that this movie was completely unneccessary… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

3absh84Oct 13, 2019

Please don't look at the negative reviews people have of this film, and miss the chance to see one of the best space movies ever made.
Go watch it, and judge it for yourself.
This film is a 10/10 in my book and probably one of the top 10Please don't look at the negative reviews people have of this film, and miss the chance to see one of the best space movies ever made.
Go watch it, and judge it for yourself.
This film is a 10/10 in my book and probably one of the top 10 movies I've ever seen.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

MPReviewsOct 12, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Pros:
-Solid characters that I found myself fairly invested in.
-Good performances, particularly from Brad Pitt and Tommy Lee Jones.
-Great visuals and atmosphere.
-The way the film portrays space travel is very interesting since it’s very likely that that is what it will actually be like in possibly a decade or so. -The movie is slow paced, but unlike Star Trek: The Motion Picture where it was only made like that to pad out the run time, in this film it works in favor of the story. -The film as a whole feels realistic, which makes it even easier for us to connect to these characters.
-The scene where Tommy Lee Jones’ character, H. Clifford McBride, commits suicide nearly made me tear up, something only a few films in the past have managed to accomplish.

Cons:
-The placement of the scene where Roy, Brad Pitt’s character, is collecting data from the Lima Project I found confusing because it happens after H. Clifford McBride commits suicide and the transition to this scene doesn’t make it clear enough that it’s a flashback. I admit it’s a nitpick, but it left me a little confused when I watched the movie. -While I believe the slow pacing works in the film’s favor as it helps to add suspense to the movie, it may turn off some viewers who are looking for a more fast paced action heavy sci-fi movie, and some of the trailers for this movie make it seem as though this is something like that, when it reality it is slow paced and doesn’t have too much action. -Roy seems a little too devoted to saving his father considering what he knows what he has done to his other crew member and he even straight up tells him he never cared about him or his mother, especially considering how emotionally detached he is portrayed as being in the movie.
-The film’s main core message seems to be one that I think most people already know. It still serves as a good cautionary tale, but it’s still a message I feel like most people are already aware of. -It’s kind of hard to be invested in Liv Tyler’s character because we see very little of her throughout the movie. We only really care about her because Roy cares about her, and that’s not really a good thing.

Final verdict: I enjoyed Ad Astra. I have a few small issues with it here and there, but it is overall a well made film that I would recommend checking out. Just be sure you know what you are getting into when going to see it.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

HarmiclirOct 12, 2019

The movie looks good. The acting is fine. But the plot is obvious and dull. Pitts voice over is done in hushed, reverent tones that amplify the slow running of the thing in the first half and the almost complete cessation of movement inThe movie looks good. The acting is fine. But the plot is obvious and dull. Pitts voice over is done in hushed, reverent tones that amplify the slow running of the thing in the first half and the almost complete cessation of movement in the second half.

For the first time in years, I closed my eyes for the last 20 minutes and kinda sorta listened and had no difficulty following any of it. If you're half-sleeping through a movie.....… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

TreasuresamericOct 11, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. People have compared this to Interstellar and Contact. There is no comparison, as those two movies were immeasurably better.

This movie was advertised to have a “realistic” depiction of space travel. Nope. There was nothing realistic (whatsoever).

In essence, the entire movie can be summed up as: Brad Pitt, a quirky guy, misses dad. Brad Pitt undergoes unrealistic, boring experiences. Brad Pitt finds his dad. Brad Pitt loses his dad. Brad Pitt comes home. Roll end credits.

It’s a boring movie with nothing profound or entertaining about it. No comedy, no action, no compelling imagery, no real story, and nothing reality based about space travel. The other actors the trailer makes seem important are virtually non-existent in the film.

Tommy Lee Jones gets about 6 minutes... 4 of which are repeated videos from decades ago playing on his futuristic iPad. Liv Tyler hets about 2 minutes, all as flashbacks from the past. Donald Sutherland gets 5 minutes, but has a heart attack in the beginning of the movie and doesn’t die... so..(?)

Now, the solitary reason it gets even one star from me (instead of zero) is that, given the character that poor Brad Pitt was given to play, he played it well. The character is ridiculous, but is played well.

Spaceballs and Howard the Duck were better films.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

4

reflexreactionOct 11, 2019

Yet again the critics prove they’re out of touch with the rest of us. Did I really just watch the same film as them? Boring, slow and terribly written. Not worth the time (and I LOVE sci-fi!)

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

wevertonaguiiarOct 11, 2019

Efeitos visuais belissimos, um personagem principal sem carisma mas que gera empatia e uma direção quieta porém objetiva. Temos tudo isso aqui em Ad Astra. Brad Pitt está incrível mais uma vez.. pode facilmente ser indicado ao Oscar. O pontoEfeitos visuais belissimos, um personagem principal sem carisma mas que gera empatia e uma direção quieta porém objetiva. Temos tudo isso aqui em Ad Astra. Brad Pitt está incrível mais uma vez.. pode facilmente ser indicado ao Oscar. O ponto baixo do filme é a desnecessária lentidão. O ritmo é importante para desenvolver personagem e história, mas o filme exagera um pouco. De resto, bom filme.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

7

AngryHedgehogOct 10, 2019

A movie that in my opinion dares to give the absolute opposite answer to a question we are all so sure has a positive answer; Is there life out there? If there is not then we better value the insanely unique "life" we have right here in ourA movie that in my opinion dares to give the absolute opposite answer to a question we are all so sure has a positive answer; Is there life out there? If there is not then we better value the insanely unique "life" we have right here in our own solar system. If we are alone, then it becomes almost duty for us to expand, to leave the boundaries of our own solarsystem… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

3

kirkenderOct 10, 2019

Science Fiction is meant to be inquisitive, thoughtful, expansive and imaginative. Ad Astra is cynical, conservative, boring, and shallow. There is a sense that its meant to be 'realistic' but its lazy and mean. Toxic masculinity: A SpaceScience Fiction is meant to be inquisitive, thoughtful, expansive and imaginative. Ad Astra is cynical, conservative, boring, and shallow. There is a sense that its meant to be 'realistic' but its lazy and mean. Toxic masculinity: A Space Opera. Plot holes are plentiful. There are meandering, meaningless voice overs that do nothing to further the plot or 'emotional' journey. Also; there are 2 black people in the movie and they are brutally killed on screen. All the white people get dignified or off screen deaths. WTF.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

4

dbwingcoOct 9, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not that great. Pitt's performance is fine but soulless. The cinematography is the highlight of the film which isn't a bad thing. The film didn't break any new ground on father/son relationships or relationships in general and it really didn't answer or even ask questions about extraterrestrial life. Would be careful recommending this one.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

MattBrady99Oct 9, 2019

“Work hard, play later.”

Once a year ever since ‘Gravity’ was released, we seem to get new stories about the voyage of space where certain characters “do not go gentle into that good night.” I wasn’t wowed over the trailers for Ad Astra,“Work hard, play later.”

Once a year ever since ‘Gravity’ was released, we seem to get new stories about the voyage of space where certain characters “do not go gentle into that good night.”

I wasn’t wowed over the trailers for Ad Astra, because when you work at a cinema and spent most of your day watching trailers, well trust me when I say this didn’t stand out from the rest. I originally thought it was about saving the world or something like that. For what it didn’t advertise was a slow burn sci-fi movie that’s on the same level as ‘Blade Runner 2049’ and the emotional side as ‘First Man’. A personal story told through a first person narrative about unresolved issues from past relationship.

Basically an art house movie with a huge budget.

‘Ad Astra’ was pretty good. After only seeing it once, I feel that this will grow on me overtime and so far it has. A mixture of both ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ and Terrence Malick movies. While not as great as those two comparisons, but while watching I couldn’t help to be reminded of those two.

There's some beautiful and impressive shots through out the movie, especially when the movie constantly shows you the entire scale of space and planets through the characters journey. The colors adds to environment that oozes with style and has a tranquil feel to it. I think that’s where the Blade Runner vibes really come in. Brilliant cinematography by Hoyte Van Hoytema.

Brad Pitt was terrific as the silent astronaut with tangled mood swings. It’s not an explosive performance, just simple enough for it to be effective. Any other actor would’ve gone big for no other reasons than being overly dramatic and it makes sense for his character to be closed off; similar to Ryan Gosling in ‘First Man’, where his emotional health comes last. You learn very little about his character, as most of his backstory is only in the background for you to piece together the puzzle.

The score was mystical and often eerie at times which helped ties in with the unknown aspects of space. The visual effects are excellent and nearly photorealistic at times - something you come to expect by now with space movies.

I wasn’t too sure about the narration at first, because it was very off putting and a cheap way for the character to express himself. However it sorta grew on me after awhile and some of it was almost rambling with Roy questioning every decision he made.

Now for the issues:

I have no idea why Liv Tyler was in this movie, because she literally does nothing and could have easily been cut out. It felt like a reshoot for some reason.

Remember when I said the visual effects are photorealistic ‘at times’, but that isn’t always the case with certain scenes. There’s a deranged chimpanzee that pops up and it looks really phoney. I think that entire scene could been cut out. I’ve brought up twice about cutting scenes, because I believe if this movie went back to the editing room one more time, then my score would be a lot higher.

There’s a ridiculously and almost laughable scene where Roy (Brad Pitt) steaks into a spaceship that he’s not suppose to be on, and all the astronauts onboard go into a frenzy and accidentally start kill themselves while trying to cease Roy. No joke. Roy dosen’t even do anything as he never intended to hurt them. It was cheap way of making Roy isolated for the rest of the movie. A few years ago I remember reading a horrifying incident that happened to astronaut Luca Parmitano where he reported water inside of his space suit helmet, and nearly become the first astronaut to drown in space. However, Luca remained calm throughout the whole incident despite the odds of him dying being high, but in the end he survived. So it’s really strange seeing these trained astronauts freaking out because came on board.

Overall rating: Out of the whole spectacle, I find the meaning of the movie the most striking. The themes of family, love and abandonment plays a major role in the story. The whole idea of “working hard and playing later” comes with a cost, which is the less time we spend with our loved ones and abandoning everything to pursuit something better out there when in reality the best things in life are right here. When you discover nothing there’s no turing back and no finding your way back. I’ve been thinking about it for awhile now after seeing the movie.

Never underestimate James Gray as a storyteller.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

2

marconaOct 9, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Another bloated, over-produced let down in an era of bloated, over produced letdowns. This movie wants to be everything, but winds up being a muddled pile of nothing.

Brad Pitt is a fine actor and he does his best, but the story is ungodly awful. I realize this is sci-fi and we are suspending belief, but they have asked an awful lot of us here.

The main premise is that a guy who has been traveling space for almost 30 years (unheard from for 16 years, supposedly dead) is parked outside Neptune and is firing life-ending energy blasts at Earth. This guy is Brad Pitt's dad and they recruit him to get kill/retrieve/stop him. Okay, cute premise.

Brad then needs to go to the moon (flew commercial, terrible scene), then Mars (3 days trip, goofy side story), then to Neptune. The trip to Neptune takes 63 days, if I recall. So, a madman is out there on Neptune, we can go get him in 2 months, and they wait 16 years? Granted, the energy surges just started, but still... wouldn't you want to follow up?

Sorry for being glib, but the movie itself is glib. It is filled with empty emotion, meaningless action sequences, and long stretches of nothing. It has no identity. It desperately wants to be Apocalypse Now, but it falls woefully short. Wait for the streaming release.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

chrisse989Oct 9, 2019

A genuine master piece. It is a very beautiful movie. Overall storyline is not hyperoriginal, but there are a lot of references which made an impression on me. Go see it!

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

1

TrunkisOct 8, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Saw the reviews for this and was really excited for it. But this was dreadful. The story just doesn't make sense. Obviously radio waves just don't exist in this universe! If they did this story wouldn't have been necessary. A guy needs travel all the way to mars to send a voice message to Neptune?? It couldn't have been sent to Mars? Brad Pitt needed to be in a sound proof room to record a message?? He's able to board a rocket as it launches? Obviously G forces don't exist either or Newton's laws of motion for that matter. When is this set?? They had better Luna buggy's in 1970's! A wave capable of power surges billions of miles through space but doesn't effect the source in any way! Ridiculous character reactions ruin the acting too! The most important mission in human history and they pack pitt off on a commercial flight for secrecy?? With a geriatric?? My god. I was actually laughing every few minutes. If this was fantasy sci-fi fine, but this seemed to want to be "realistic". Baah. Space 1999 was more realistic than this. By the end you have to ask what was the point and how are you not up for 3 counts of manslaughter? It gets 1 star for the visuals only.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

BeardedYodaOct 8, 2019

A very intelligent and fascinating film that is bound to get some Oscar buzz around it. The acting in the film is great, the story is awesome and the world the film creates is absolutely outstanding.

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

SirDidymusOct 1, 2019

Interstellar with an inner monologue. Great performances and beautiful visuals that are held back by a few minor plot and pacing issues. It feels longer than it's two hour run time.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

Bertaut1Oct 7, 2019

Despite some absurd diversions (chase scene! horror scene! shoot-out scene!), this is a quality science-fiction narrative

Hoping to step into the lineage of such esoteric science-fiction films as 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and SolyarisDespite some absurd diversions (chase scene! horror scene! shoot-out scene!), this is a quality science-fiction narrative

Hoping to step into the lineage of such esoteric science-fiction films as 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and Solyaris (1972), Ad Astra is, first and foremost, a mainstream Hollywood movie wherein the demand for crowd-pleasing content clashes with the desire for esotericism. This is manifested in the form of an overly convenient resolution and some of the most ludicrous narrative diversions since the abomination that was Star Wars: The Last Jedi (space pirates! enraged simians! shoot-out!). Which is not to say that I disliked the film – I didn't; even if the narrative never manages to get beyond Heart of Darkness in space and the script relies far too heavily on a sub-Terrence Malick voiceover. The craft on display is exceptional and the story is thought-provoking, with some spectacular visuals. But it could have been so much better.

In the near future, a series of energy surges originating near Neptune leave much of Earth without power. 29 years previously, H. Clifford McBride (Tommy Lee Jones), left Earth with the Lima Project, a mission aimed at establishing contact with alien civilisations. Travelling to the same region near Neptune from which the surges are now emanating, 16 years into the mission, all contact was lost. SpaceCom presumed the crew dead, but now they fear that a possibly unhinged Clifford could be behind the surges. And so Maj. Roy McBride (Brad Pitt), Clifford's son, is to travel to a secure long-range communications base on Mars and record a message for Clifford in the hopes he might respond.

Written by James Gray and Ethan Gross, and directed by Gray, Ad Astra wastes no time in tying us rigidly to Roy's perspective; it opens with a POV shot from inside his helmet, and the first words we hear are him speaking in voiceover. This sets up the narrative to come, as Roy remains the sole focaliser throughout. The fact that the film is set amongst the stars, but remains always tied to Roy's perception allows Gray to fashion a narrative that's both massive in scope yet emotionally intimate. He's aided in this by cinematographer Hoyte van Hoytema, whose gorgeous 35mm celluloid photography captures the overwhelming scale, but also frequently frames Pitt in tight close-ups.

Initially played as emotionally closed off ("I've been trained to compartmentalise my emotions"), Roy's stoicism slowly starts to erode as his mission begins to go wrong. Pitt's performance shuns emotional grandstanding, and is terrifically modulated and minimalist, using the lack of outward emotion to inform the character's emotional beats, relying on subtlety and nuanced gesture.

Thematically, Ad Astra is the story of two men obsessed with their profession to the detriment of all else, and like most of Gray's films, it's heavily androcentric, as are its most obvious narrative influences – Heart of Darkness (1899) and Apocalypse Now (1979). Within this, an especially interesting theme is commercialism - Roy takes a Virgin America shuttle to the moon, whilst an exterior shot of a lunar base shows signs for Applebee's, DHL, and Subway. And since the moon is now so like Earth, it's blighted by many of the same issues as Earth; crime, political division, materialism. Indeed, in VO, Roy notes the moon has become a "re-creation of what we're running from on Earth".

However, for all these positives, there are some significant problems. Firstly, there are three ridiculous pseudo-action scenes. The third, at least, is the springboard for the second half of the movie, but it remains a monumentally silly way to advance the plot. The first two scenes, however, serve no such purpose; they lead nowhere, reveal nothing about the character, and have no connection to the esoteric themes found elsewhere.

Another problem is the overly neat finale, which I believe was a reshoot after test audiences responded poorly to the original ending. However, the originally scripted ending made a lot more sense and was thematically fascinating. The other big problem is the VO. Obviously intended to function in much the same way as Willard's in Apocalypse Now, the problem is that most of the time, it's describing something we can see on screen. Pitt's performance is strong enough that the VO is unnecessary, and it's hugely distracting. By the half-way stage, I was sick of Roy's cod-philosophical ramblings that come across like someone trying and failing to imitate Malick.

With all that said, however, it's a testament to the story that despite these hurdles, I still enjoyed the film. The manner in which Gray juxtaposes an intimate tone with massive themes is impressive, and Pitt gives a strong performance. In essence, Ad Astra is a fable about the importance of human connection, played out against the backdrop of the infinite, and despite some significant problems, it's well worth checking out.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

hnestlyontheslyOct 7, 2019

Doing this review in October, two weekends late, but there’s really not much to say about this one. I’m generally pretty opposed to the genre of true-to-life, near-future space movies with a few exceptions, like Moon (2009) and ContactDoing this review in October, two weekends late, but there’s really not much to say about this one. I’m generally pretty opposed to the genre of true-to-life, near-future space movies with a few exceptions, like Moon (2009) and Contact (1997). For the most part, they feel a little smug and self-serious like First Man and Gravity. “But what about The Martian???” everyone responds. “It was such a feel-good movie! It was so scientifically ACCURATE,” to which I say, I watch YouTube videos on picture frame hanging for scientific accuracy, I go to see movies for original storytelling. Interstellar and Arrival felt like hypebeasty films that never really delivered on their promises. Space movies feel like an excuse to use a lot of CGI and green screens, off-set by a tremendous amount of time in tiny, windowless compartments, and mildly gross shots of people squirting food directly in front of their mouths and then slurping it slowly into their food holes. If there isn’t a fear for space food consumption yet I’m coining it now: cosmophagyphobia.

These vanity projects are so common nowadays that Mekado Murphy from the NYT has a short article outlining the phenomenon of movie stars receiving their own Space Movies as a kind of rite of passage as they hit stardom. Which is all just to say, I know this is a me thing not a movie thing, but I still think the “serious science” genre of space movies has a lot to learn from their goofy younger sci-fi siblings. Also, I blame Tom Hanks for all of this **** **** One spot of joy and light in this movie’s otherwise bleak and craven existence is the fact that Polygon did a fabulous write up of this film in which they summarized the trailer as such, “Brad Astra is Sad Astra because of his Dad Astra”–that recommendation comes care of Friend from work, and I think says everything you need to know about the movie. The thing that really pissed me off every time I saw this goddamn trailer at the movie theater was how **** quickly it appears that things go to **** in this goddamn movie. You see Brad Pitt fighting in a MOONCHASE of all things, because NASA can’t have it’s act together for the 48 hours it takes for him to leave Earth’s orbit, apparently. The fact that **** goes down so quickly really made me feel like the story was putting unnecessary restraints on itself. No one is going to be able to find, neutralize, and resolve an anti-matter death ray on Saturn if they’re having trouble with their very first way station...

All that said, this movie was disappointing in so many ways. Anyone who went expecting that Ruth Negga and Liv Tyler were going to have speaking lines was sorely disappointed. Despite being what I think amounted to “Mayor of Mars,” Negga has effectively no control over any of the operations of her base, not even of the tiny little transmission room they use to let teens play their loud rock music on Mars. Also, the circumstances of her birth and her relationship to the search for extra-terrestial life mission that Sad Pitt’s father was a part of is still really murky to me. Was she conceived before the astronauts went into space and born on Mars? Or was the trip so long that the astronauts had sex in space and then gave birth… on Mars? I’m so confused by this plot point. Although the discovery at the end of this movie is quite nice, it runs into the Mowgli problem, AKA “Traveling at the Speed of Plot,” where a character can run on foot through a burning **** forest in five minutes where it takes him half of his childhood to make it there the first time. So too with Brad Astra. When I asked, “How long DOES it take to get to Saturn?” Friend responds sagely, “It depends how fast you’re going,” which is both wise and infuriating.

My major takeaway is that this movie makes Sandra Bullock look like an **** Everything that she does by the skin of her teeth and only after minutes of calculations and preparation, Brad can do in his sleep. He’s an astronaut and Mars’s most stealthy climber and a skilled nuclear technician and a feelsy ex-husband. Dad mentioned similar things when we checked notes, but he was less bothered by the Moon. He also mentioned the weirdness of not having sent a drone or probe or something to have stopped the anti-matter death ray, so at least we’re on the same page there.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

joeyabukiOct 7, 2019

Explore the galaxy. Search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Are we alone in the universe? Are we self-destructive? Are we willing to continue until the end regardless of the consequences? Do we become what we judge without realizing it? TheExplore the galaxy. Search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Are we alone in the universe? Are we self-destructive? Are we willing to continue until the end regardless of the consequences? Do we become what we judge without realizing it? The story that the film tells us has a very deep meaning and explores the most hidden corners of the human being. A slow movie that goes through the stages of degradation and collapse of an individual feeling lost and the will to continue forward and get up to reach a goal. The sound and score, the photography, the scenarios and landscapes, the cinematography, the direction and the colours are really gorgeous.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

BikerjamesOct 7, 2019

I don't mind the slow pacing - but the movie really pushes the limits of believability in many scenes. I actually chuckled at the ridiculousness of certain scenes, especially when he used a shield through a rock field which not only did notI don't mind the slow pacing - but the movie really pushes the limits of believability in many scenes. I actually chuckled at the ridiculousness of certain scenes, especially when he used a shield through a rock field which not only did not push him backwards but didn't change his course, and he somehow projected the trajectory back to his craft perfectly from a spinning turbine. WOW. Although Brad Pitt is fine in the roll, I didn't feel a connection to him, and didn't feel the connection between him and his father either. The overall look of the film is excellent and its saving grace. I'm still not sure what was causing the electrical surges that was taking place throughout the universe, but some of the dialogue was muddied here and there and difficult to decipher. People sitting around me were complaining about the slow pacing when the film ended. The film reminded me of a space version of Apocalypse Now, where the destination is a mad man and the journey getting there is treacherous and death. Ad Astra is not at the level of that masterpiece of course, but maybe worth seeing for the overall visual look.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

4

kpb1973Oct 7, 2019

One of the most thematically and emotionally confused films i've seen in many years.

The point of the movie is seemingly to explore father-son dynamics, the burden of isolation, how the near-space of our minds might just be more importantOne of the most thematically and emotionally confused films i've seen in many years.

The point of the movie is seemingly to explore father-son dynamics, the burden of isolation, how the near-space of our minds might just be more important than the deep-space of our ambitions - plus a multitude of other worthy subjects in between.

To do this, the film-makers have assembled a stellar cast, tremendous visual effects and exceptional set design.

With such an armoury at their disposal, how could Grey, Pitt and co fail?

Well...chuck in some psychopathic space monkeys, illogical interplanetary journeys, loaded-for-bear lunar pirate carjackers, countless instances of laughably improbable (and I mean utterly ridiculous) science and you're halfway to Oblivion. No pun intended.

At regular intervals come scenes that are so far-fetched that they ask less of a "willing suspension of disbelief" and promise more of an "insult to your intelligence". The metal panel through the rings of Neptune was extraordinary in this regards, but it is just one of MANY that punctured any bond I had with the underlying themes the film is trying to explore.

Additionally, Pitt's transformation from sociopath to social worker is practically instantaneous and therefore unconvincing (although the moments of high emotion that he does show are well delivered) and Lee's character is even more unlikeable. The fact there is no opportunity for them to bond, bounce off and understand each other leaves an emotional void even greater than some of the plot mechanics.

In trying to weave high art themes with low brow science, there whole film just feels disconnected - from its component parts, from its lofty intentions and indeed from many of its audience.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

5

MaximumDOct 7, 2019

Wow, I was really jacked to see this movie. Everyone's saying it's like next best SciFi flick. I got burned again by the critics. Acting and cinematography were very well done, but beyond that, what a snooze-fest. Nothing interesting happensWow, I was really jacked to see this movie. Everyone's saying it's like next best SciFi flick. I got burned again by the critics. Acting and cinematography were very well done, but beyond that, what a snooze-fest. Nothing interesting happens in this movie. I appreciate that it is trying to be grounded in reality but then it goes and throws that out the window with unbelievable physics in some sequences. I don't want to spoil anything, but this movie is basically 2 hours of waiting for something to happen. I wouldn't even call this SciFi. It's more like a family drama. Completely disappointed. If you are expecting something along the lines of 2001, Interstellar,etc., sorry but prepare to be bored to death. Even the Martian, which is a comparable movie to this, was leaps and bounds ahead. If you like nice space visuals, it might be worth it to see unless you have an awesome HD TV at home.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

0

MFCOct 6, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Can't believe this movie is getting any good reviews. Linear, superficial, soppy and dull.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

7

JPKOct 6, 2019

Uhhhhhh, Okay
Ad Astra is pretty disappointing, But it still has a great performance from Brad Pitt and incredible visuals.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

7

zumballyuOct 6, 2019

Slow moving interstellar drama that pits Brad Pitt’s exceptional acting against lackluster writing and aesthetically dubious narrative fillers. What most surprised me about the movie was it’s tension. The lightness and boundlessness ofSlow moving interstellar drama that pits Brad Pitt’s exceptional acting against lackluster writing and aesthetically dubious narrative fillers. What most surprised me about the movie was it’s tension. The lightness and boundlessness of floating through space contrasts sharply with scenes of bodies flailing hopelessly to the earth, skulls cracking on airlock windows and human arms being devoured by genetically modified space apes. However where the more subtle tension builds around the theme of space travel, huge opportunities are lost by not exploiting Liv Tyler’s character as the strained romantic relationship between her and the protagonist. Also the father-son drama although mostly well acted lacks in believability and emotional connection.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

antolunaOct 5, 2019

Excelente película muy buena manera de tratar la ciencia ficción Brad Pitt hace una excelente actuación de un hombre reprimido y cabe resaltar los efectos visuales que son demasiado buenos

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

10

drovskiOct 5, 2019

A heavily psychological take on the human experience with space. If you liked children of men there’s a good chance you’ll also like this film.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

JalemanyOct 5, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Wanting to be big, it feels small. Maybe the father-son cliché does not reach enough depth, maybe the space stories and the threat for Earth are too secondary, maybe it's waaaaay toooo sloooow. Also, the Moon and Mars stories seem to take place on some seedy outskirts, with no control, authority of technological advancements ... really, driving little cars and surrounded by thieves ?!! Disappointing.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

Cyruss77Oct 5, 2019

honestly are we watching the same film here? no story to speak of an absolute flat line of a movie great actors talents wasted completely i want my 2 hours life back please!!

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

4

MovieDoctorOct 5, 2019

Very slow moving. Not enough substance to keep the movie goer interested. I was waiting for it to end. Too bad, it had enough to work with but it just fell way to short.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

TheodorKingOct 5, 2019

This movie is really pretty. The cinematography is top-notch. Set designs, visual effects, art direction. All of the technical aspects are great. Also, Brad Pit is also really pretty. Good acting on his part. Even though there wasn't a lot toThis movie is really pretty. The cinematography is top-notch. Set designs, visual effects, art direction. All of the technical aspects are great. Also, Brad Pit is also really pretty. Good acting on his part. Even though there wasn't a lot to act. The music is fine. But, that's it for the pluses. Overall, this is a two-hour road trip in space. The problem is, there are no roads in space, only darkness. So it's not even a road trip, it's a two-hour airplane travel. The script is as simple as a short comic at the end of a newspaper. Some storylines in the scrip just don't make any sense. Whole characters and scenes could have been gone without any consequences to the plot. The movie could be literally 30 minutes. It felt like 3 hours, even though, it's only 2. Your brain has nothing to do there. Mine tried. But the fact is, the movie is basically telling you everything. And it doesn't talk much. I don't understand why this was two-hour movie. It would have been a great short film. But instead, it's more of a good planetary exhibition rather than a good movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

WagyuMeatloafOct 4, 2019

I'm torn on this one because I love me a space adventure and the visuals and atmosphere are amazing but I just couldn't shake the feeling of mehness when I left the theater. It's not bad but a few things drag it down for me. First, the actionI'm torn on this one because I love me a space adventure and the visuals and atmosphere are amazing but I just couldn't shake the feeling of mehness when I left the theater. It's not bad but a few things drag it down for me. First, the action scenes felt out of place and were unnecessary diversions that didn't affect the storyline so it was like they were just checking off a box which contributes to a bit of an identity crisis of what kind of film it wants to be. Second, the narration was totally unnecessary and felt distracting. Finally, the plot was very straightforward and obvious. It failed to trigger my inquisitive mind which is a necessity for a slow-burn kind of movie.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

1

cpnscarletOct 4, 2019

It is a stupid, pretentious movie with a story that tries to be too smart by half. The final reveal is an interesting concept, but it is so wrapped up and almost totally buried in a "Daddy doesn't love me anymore" story, that you just won'tIt is a stupid, pretentious movie with a story that tries to be too smart by half. The final reveal is an interesting concept, but it is so wrapped up and almost totally buried in a "Daddy doesn't love me anymore" story, that you just won't care. The space tech is just a tiny bit interesting toward the start of the movie, but that charm is rapidly lost in interior insipid monologues.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

PrleOct 4, 2019

Aside from casting one of the biggest names in Hollywood this movie is awful. No plot nor suspense, failed to to show the structure and good script writing. Pitt seems to have lost interest in making good-quality performances or movies forAside from casting one of the biggest names in Hollywood this movie is awful. No plot nor suspense, failed to to show the structure and good script writing. Pitt seems to have lost interest in making good-quality performances or movies for that matter. Visual effects are below average as well. Just terrible.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

DerekReideOct 4, 2019

I think in the grand scheme of things, 'Ad Astra' serves its purpose. Just looking at the reviews on both RottenTomatoes and MetaCritic, people have completely misunderstood the film. I don't directly blame them at all, to be honest. The filmI think in the grand scheme of things, 'Ad Astra' serves its purpose. Just looking at the reviews on both RottenTomatoes and MetaCritic, people have completely misunderstood the film. I don't directly blame them at all, to be honest. The film was mis-marketed to be a Sci-Fi epic, like some big action movie. But that is not the case. 'Ad Astra' is a slow-burn character study of sorts of Brad Pitt's character. The film is absolutely gorgeous with stellar cinematography, incredible visuals, and a possible Oscar nomination worthy performance from the lead role, Brad Pitt. Overall, this is definitively the next 'Interstellar' in ways, but a very different Sci-Fi film in general. Plan to see something entirely different than what was marketed!… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

1

Amano81Oct 4, 2019

Most boring movie ever, I want my time and money back. The movie industry completely run out of imagination and creativity it’s almost impossible to watch a good movie nowadays. Also the ratings and critics in sites like this one failMost boring movie ever, I want my time and money back. The movie industry completely run out of imagination and creativity it’s almost impossible to watch a good movie nowadays. Also the ratings and critics in sites like this one fail completely to distinguish what is worth watching.. all seem fake and sponsor by lobbies - somehow this movie is highly rated here (by some virtual reviewers) yet every real person I talk to has the same opinion as me that this was the most boring movie they have ever watched!… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

3

namelessOct 3, 2019

Save your money, it works better when you have the opportunity to fast forward. The users are correct, ignore the professionals. Brad Pitt holds this movie together but it is hard to say this is a movie, it is really a novel brought to theSave your money, it works better when you have the opportunity to fast forward. The users are correct, ignore the professionals. Brad Pitt holds this movie together but it is hard to say this is a movie, it is really a novel brought to the screen. Very little action. Mostly Brad Pitt narrating his thoughts as he moves from point A to point B to point C... Our thoughts are the strength of a novel but not a movie. I think the only reason this got released to the theaters inside of direct to DVD is Brad Pitt.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

4

CaspROct 3, 2019

This Movie, while visually stunning, had almost no character development, left me wanting more in everything from a deeper story line to an actual purpose to the movie. The ending of the movie was nothing more than anticlimactic let down, notThis Movie, while visually stunning, had almost no character development, left me wanting more in everything from a deeper story line to an actual purpose to the movie. The ending of the movie was nothing more than anticlimactic let down, not that there really was any climax to the movie. i went in having zero expectations and was horribly let down. such big names tragically under utilized. All Negatives aside, the visuals and score in this movie were phenomenal. The realism of this sci fi movie was believable, left me excited and wanting more. I think this movie had a lot of potential but wasn't able to deliver a complete product. Every character interaction was extremely surface level and almost seemed completely irrelevant. there seemed to be this urgency to jump around from situation, to interaction, as if they were in a rush to jam this 12 hour movie into the allotted time yet there was no payoff. I would recommend this as a lazy rainy Sunday watch, if theres NOTHING else to peak your interest. wouldn't spend money on it. Catch it on TV.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

2

BoozehoundOct 2, 2019

Boring, nonsensical drama. Like typical films of our time, all of the worthwhile scenes are in the trailer. Do not recommend, unless you are sleep deprived.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

1

BondanhoOct 2, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I don’t understand why I have gone to this film because it doesn’t show anything new in the industry if it only contradicts to the all physics laws and uses Brad Pitt’s name to PR but in fact it is just second-rate film with no humor, breathtaking actor’s play and logic. 1 point only for the special effects and beautiful landscapes.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

9

RodukaOct 2, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. First of all, this movie has nothing to do with Interestellar. Interestellar is the same movie as Inception, but in space. It's clever, extremely well done, and that's it. I don't even think Ad Astra is a sci-fi movie, as the space is only a metaphor for the main character's journey in life through solitude. Always looking out, trying to find reasons and answers, with goals in mind, and never looking in. It's about how our parents are in many ways our heroes, how much they are an example in our lives. But as we grow older, we end up learning that they're only humans, with flaws, and resentment and maybe also capable of grandious things. People can trash them, or put them on pedestals, but the truth is nobody is perfect nor the devil. It has strong religious conotation. The cinematography is amazing, and it's Brad's best acting ever. I didn't have problems with the pace and narration of the movie, but some people did. I must admit that Max Richter did let me down. I'm waiting for the 3 hour cut from Criterion, since some scenes from the trailer were not in the movie. And don't read those reviews trashing the movie. The character was not on a trip to f*cking Neptune for Christ's sake. He just went on a journey inside himself to find out how he became that person, and how he didn't want to be that person anymore. People are just so f*cking used to get everything chewed up that they can't even think for themselves nowadays. I'll tell you what, you want to go on a journey? Watch the movie and then read some reviews trashing it. It's really like going on a trip to human stupidity.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

3

SeussMyTubOct 2, 2019

Brad Pitt as an astronaut who is sent on a mission to contact his father (Tommy Lee Jones as another astronaut) who supposedly went missing almost 30 years ago. It's got big ideas, but it falls totally flat. I didnt like the world buildingBrad Pitt as an astronaut who is sent on a mission to contact his father (Tommy Lee Jones as another astronaut) who supposedly went missing almost 30 years ago. It's got big ideas, but it falls totally flat. I didnt like the world building and the huge plot holes didnt help either. I have no idea why critics would even like this movie.… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

4

caveatscotiOct 1, 2019

Heart of Darkness in space, which could have been great , but... Beautiful cinematography, Brad Pitt at his best and some tense action scenes early on- these are the good. The bad: the third act is a tedious go-nowhere slog (literally),Heart of Darkness in space, which could have been great , but... Beautiful cinematography, Brad Pitt at his best and some tense action scenes early on- these are the good. The bad: the third act is a tedious go-nowhere slog (literally), there’s jump-scare reveal scene so dumb it seems to have teleported in from another movie, and the science is bad. Baaaaad. Gravity works and then it doesn’t, sometimes in the same scene; space is vast but then conveniently small when the plot requires it; and gunfights inside a spacecraft? No. Just no. And the over-arching theme ends up being: ‘human achievement is hard and turns you into an empty misanthrope- stay home and make babies, you’re better off.’ The horror. The. Horror.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

4

dmarkwindOct 1, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Slow, dragging, and more than a little depressing. The effects are good and Brad Pitt does a great job playing an emotionally compromised astronaut who turns out to be bad luck to a lot of the folks he comes in contact with. The psychological check-ins his character has to regularly endure make you wonder if he’s just playing the game or what his real motives might be, while at the same time giving hints of a fascist government pulling the strings from back home. It does show us a few things no space movie I’ve seen has shown us before, including: a person parachuting down from an low-orbit antenna station, a high-speed moon buggy chase, a unique fight scene in space, an astronaut swimming underwater in his space suit, and the first space surfing I’ve seen since Dark Star. Overall, not a favorite or something I’ll need to see again.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

9

VadertimeOct 1, 2019

I went to see this movie with my wife when it opened 2 weeks ago. She was not impressed, but I loved the movie. My expectations, based on the reviews, were a little mixed. However, I was really surprised at how this movie drew me into theI went to see this movie with my wife when it opened 2 weeks ago. She was not impressed, but I loved the movie. My expectations, based on the reviews, were a little mixed. However, I was really surprised at how this movie drew me into the story and how superb Brad Pitt's acting was and really moved the story along to it's climax. When this comes out on DVD, it will become part of my permanent collection.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

4

steve-wOct 1, 2019

I left 60mins in…………says it all! Just too pretentious, slow and in truth boring for my taste. A save the world movie in slow motion
In its favour! Brad Pitt tries

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

4

tenoutoftenSep 30, 2019

I'm genuinely baffled by how it is possible for some viewers to be moved by this appalling piece of garbage calling itself a movie. It's random shots stitched together with virtually no plot. Ludicrous.

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

10

TachSep 30, 2019

I loved this movie. This is one of the most technically beautiful films I’ve ever seen. Brad Pitt is really solid

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

10

GrantD243Sep 30, 2019

Ad Astra is similar to Gloria Bell in that general audiences just aren’t going to like it. It’s a slow burn that has an emotionally distant lead character...and that’s basically poison to general audiences. With that being said, a lot ofAd Astra is similar to Gloria Bell in that general audiences just aren’t going to like it. It’s a slow burn that has an emotionally distant lead character...and that’s basically poison to general audiences. With that being said, a lot of people also won’t like it purely because of the story. Like I said, it’s slow and it’s more about Roy’s journey to finding that emotion he lacks in the beginning. It’s about a man and his desire to have a relationship with his father. Space travel is not the true focus here. I thought it was extraordinarily well done and honestly I can’t find much that I don’t like about it. It also features the best cinematography a film has had in a couple of years. Every frame is beautiful.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

7

AvodeskormSep 30, 2019

Ad Astra is inferior to the director's previous movie 'Lost City of Z'. AA contains some of what made Lost City of Z great, but utilizes it much less and trading it in for sterile narration/monologues; close-up shots of Brad Pitt's face.
AdAd Astra is inferior to the director's previous movie 'Lost City of Z'. AA contains some of what made Lost City of Z great, but utilizes it much less and trading it in for sterile narration/monologues; close-up shots of Brad Pitt's face.
Ad Astra could have been fine with the monologues if the writing was much better. An example would be the film A Scanner Darkly, which had monologues ripped straight from the book by Philip K Dick. (So of course it would be good) None of the writing is especially stand out but the direction in the monologue scenes is too true to the character. It's not directed badly, its directed to reflect the emotionless dialogues.
Almost everything else is excellent, there's just not enough of it to outweigh the poor introspective moments. What made some scenes in Ad Astra and a lot of scenes in Lost City of Z memorable is how strikingly haunting the scenes are. The emotional story is perfectly reflected in the images the director presents.
Ad Astra is not the sum of its parts; it contains scenes of brilliance combined with too many scenes of dull monologue and dialogue.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

AxeTSep 29, 2019

Admirably realistic physics in space sabotaged by enormous lapses in logic, time and distance. Too bad because elements are beautiful and it's technically well made in trying to walk the line between "2001" and more commercial scienceAdmirably realistic physics in space sabotaged by enormous lapses in logic, time and distance. Too bad because elements are beautiful and it's technically well made in trying to walk the line between "2001" and more commercial science fiction but ultimately shows the filmmakers to be too immature to fully realize their ambitious subject with the star not discerning enough on the script level. It works hard to deliver emotion but instead drags.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

alejandro970Sep 29, 2019

Now, Brad Pitt in his own space trucking with some taste to 2001, due it's philosophical context; something that would love Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke. The special effects amaze without noise, or blurring the plot. The score is moderated asNow, Brad Pitt in his own space trucking with some taste to 2001, due it's philosophical context; something that would love Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke. The special effects amaze without noise, or blurring the plot. The score is moderated as hypnotic. One of big surprises of autumn 2019.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

7

CristoParadoSep 29, 2019

A tale of overcoming depression through humility. Set in a vague “not so distant future” where mankind has reached the edge of the solar system in Neptune (as Pluto is no longer thought of as a planet) but remains unable to reach into theA tale of overcoming depression through humility. Set in a vague “not so distant future” where mankind has reached the edge of the solar system in Neptune (as Pluto is no longer thought of as a planet) but remains unable to reach into the intricacies of the soul for lack of volition and surpluses of fear. The movie moves slowly but surely into the protagonist’s acceptance of his universal needs, doubts and longings amidst a mostly gloomy atmosphere accomplished through tense and low music, sparse sound effects, and long voice-overs. It takes a nuclear explosion for the protagonist to shake off his reluctance to bond with the world thus transforming himself into a new shape of the father figure. Pitt’s performance goes splendidly from emotional unavailability to a calm vulnerability in surrender.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

0

heloheSep 29, 2019

I am a physicist, but I can enjoy some good sci-fi movie from time to time. I also don't mind some scientific inaccuracies if the movie is enjoyable. But this one is just bad. Literally everything about the movie is bad. Boring plot. BoringI am a physicist, but I can enjoy some good sci-fi movie from time to time. I also don't mind some scientific inaccuracies if the movie is enjoyable. But this one is just bad. Literally everything about the movie is bad. Boring plot. Boring ending. Bad science. Nonsensical message. Bad acting. I don't really understand why this movie even exists.
I have to say the sets and camera work is quite nice though.… Expand

10 of 17 users found this helpful107

All this user's reviews

9

systemBuilderSep 29, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The deeper you go into space, the more out of control humanity becomes. But sometimes it's the only place that has answers ...… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

8

Creeper3455Sep 29, 2019

RI'm so glad Abominable is flopping (judging from the Friday estimates). It looked terrible from the beginning,so why even bother? Anyway…

Ad Astra can also be called Rad Astra,because yes,this movie is gorgeous. Ironically Stellar,to sayRI'm so glad Abominable is flopping (judging from the Friday estimates). It looked terrible from the beginning,so why even bother? Anyway…

Ad Astra can also be called Rad Astra,because yes,this movie is gorgeous. Ironically Stellar,to say the least.
As someone who loves these kinds of movies (the Space genre,or the Experience Genre for my taste. This one breaks the barrier,though),this was probably my favourite kind of Space Movie. I love that the best Space Movies out there now are all about Daddy Issues,between this and Interstellar. Don't let the Disney/Fox merger trailers fool you into thinking it's an Action Movie,because,while this is a Space Opera (and an Action Movie for 2 Seconds) in a way,this is (at its heart) a Character-driven film. Oh,and it's also slow,but should I even care? (we'll get there later)
I mean it as "this is a Character film",because we only follow him,his experiences in Space and his struggles in life,while he's travelling his ass over the stars,amidst a Future that I would perfectly picture in my head,and a big-ass " Save The Universe" plot. Brad Pitt shows his all in this,as he plays a Character that I can kind of relate to (with lines like "I talked when I should've listened" or "They're using me") in terms of charisma,movements or even wide range of emotions. When he freaks out,he WILL freak out. There's also a cute subplot about him always being committed to the next mission and how he should stop. Good stuff.
This is also handled by some great Production Design. Hoyte Van Hoytema (the Photographer of several Nolan movies) films this and it looked beautiful from the first second. Seriously,I hated myself for remembering this didn't come out in IMAX (but Yesterday sure did,because why not),because it could've benefited A LOT from some Premium Cinema experiences. Same for the Score,as it fuels up the narrative and makes it creepy or tension-full at times. This is the one where I feel like Lorne Balfe will get the Oscar. You know he's on his way NOW.
And the Art Direction is a standout here. Never has Space looked this beautiful and stunning since 2001 A Space Odyssey. Oh,and let's discuss the Action Sequence on the Moon. That is history right there,80 seconds or less,and I'm glad they pulled the heels hardcore and went full Fury Road,between Solar Panel crashes,Gravity throws,and Laser Guns (?!?),which appears to be a common theme in this movie,and I'm glad it is.
Although,had it not been for a Plot Convenience moment,then it would've been perfect. Yeah,it's emotional and all,but it's still Plot Convenience.
And the other flaws i'll mention aren't in relation the movie,so take them as rants about the average Audience.
Are we (no,not me. THEY) now acknowledging slow movies exist and are boring to the average consumer who goes to the movies? Disney/Fox merger trailers aside,go see Costumes Abbey or Abominable (next movie for me...God) if you're that bored with Space Shenanigans.
And if you want to go see this,please support this. I'm struggling to write a coherent review for it (and usually studios like 20th Fox are crowded for Franchise craze) but I'm telling you. It's failing to make its money back,so please. Go see this and stop supporting movies like "Oscar Nominee for Best Costumes" and "Animated Yeti". Ok,Universal rant over.
Space is scary and sad,but it rocks. Hell yeah it ROCKS.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

4

frenesiSep 29, 2019

muy desilusionado con esta peli es aburrida,lenta y mal guión pero bonitos efectos especiales

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

1

caioniloSep 29, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. lfcvvcfhdhdhdhdbdbxbxbdbdbdbdbddbhdhdhxchchcggcvyvyvyvtvtvttvtvtvtvtvtvtvtv… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

10

GrachechkovskiSep 29, 2019

This film is not masterpiece - it's much more. This film like Interstellar but with more detail story about human identity. This is a adventure to a existentional crisis and deep space, to a loneliness and question for how small an univers.This film is not masterpiece - it's much more. This film like Interstellar but with more detail story about human identity. This is a adventure to a existentional crisis and deep space, to a loneliness and question for how small an univers. And actor's game is brilliant such as the sound and true background of current space's knowledge.
You will enter in existentional crisis or exit from it after watching this film.
I'm bravely saying this movie is about all mankind and it's not gonna be better… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

9

Redheaded86Sep 29, 2019

Solid space drama. Brad is convincing in the role. If you want a movie in space with a simple, yet elegant story, this is the one

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

7

Davrosdaleks1Sep 29, 2019

Ad Astra is basically a little bit of a mesh of Black Hole meets Apocalypse Now as Brad Pitt plays an astronaut who goes into space seeking his long thought dead father played by Tommy Lee Jones who may be linked to a serious of dangerousAd Astra is basically a little bit of a mesh of Black Hole meets Apocalypse Now as Brad Pitt plays an astronaut who goes into space seeking his long thought dead father played by Tommy Lee Jones who may be linked to a serious of dangerous electrical surges. It's a great looking film that can also be pretty dull at points.

This is one of the most visually impressive films of the year. There is just so much gorgeous scenery and special effects. Includes the best looking realization of the moon's surface I've ever seen. The film does a great job of balancing the whiteness or colors of the spacecraft with the darkness of space. The cinematography is also excellent with just some great camera shots.

The movie does a strong job of world building in this near future world where space travel is easier and travel to the moon is pretty routine. The setting is explained naturally without forced exposition.

This is a very deliberately paced movie that focuses too much on the hero's journey for it's own good. This is isn't too much of an issue for the first half of the film as they throw several interesting things at you. However as Pitt's character travels further away from human civilization, scenes get far more drawn out and just plain boring. I had to step away for a few minutes and didn't miss anything.

It doesn't help the movie any that the main story and the hero's journey are all really basic and predictable when you get down to it.

Though I just said how simple his character's arc was, Pitt does a really good job of selling the guy especially since he has his emotions in check for a good part of the film. Though he's not in this much, Jones also does a hell of a job. (Also, this isn't really relevant to the content of the film, but Donald Pleasance is in this and this is the first time I've seen him without facial hair. I think he's a reverse Trebeck in that I actually thinks he looks better without it despite being accustomed to him with the moustache and sometimes beard for years.)

I think this film is more appealing to those you are interested in intellectual films. If you're into pure entertainment, this may not be your thing.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

Mafia1Sep 28, 2019

This was a disappointing movie. It is shot well. The visuals are great. But overall a kind of too introspective. Boring and a poor plot.
The Plot is pointless. Feel like all the money was wasted because you have the amazing tech in theThis was a disappointing movie. It is shot well. The visuals are great. But overall a kind of too introspective. Boring and a poor plot.
The Plot is pointless. Feel like all the money was wasted because you have the amazing tech in the background of the POOR plot.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

4

catlinhSep 28, 2019

"Ad Astra" follows a story of a determined astronaut(Brad Pitt)who sets on a secret mission to locate his supposedly dead father and to find the source that is putting Earth in critical danger. This film is extremely slow-paced(and"Ad Astra" follows a story of a determined astronaut(Brad Pitt)who sets on a secret mission to locate his supposedly dead father and to find the source that is putting Earth in critical danger. This film is extremely slow-paced(and predictable)considering that it is only 2 hours(like any other movie). "Ad Astra" is monotonous throughout, with a very unnecessary, imbecile plot that makes no sense, which will put you to sleep for almost half of the movie. However, prominent themes of a meaningful relationship between a father and son is truly heartwarming to watch and the theme of sacrificing your life for your career is also shown. The special effects crew is someone I would like to applaud to. I appreciate that they were able to successfully create a space-like environment in a movie theater, although, it was excruciatingly lagging. They could have cut out many parts of simple (silent) sequences or transitions which were at least 5 minutes or longer, that could have been much shorter. James Gray, with "Ad Astra" has tried too hard to make this a meaningful, original movie. With monologues that were sappy and not so bittersweet as it should have been. This film has many characters that serve almost no impact on or a crucial role in the film, which I am not a fan of. In conclusion, PLEASE do NOT waste a movie ticket or your money to watch "Ad Astra" if you are not into space-related films. More importantly, PLEASE do NOT bring your kids or friends who are 17 or under as they will get bored and most likely doze off. As a teenager watching "Ad Astra", felt like years. I got bored very easily and fell asleep like the majority of the audience. If I was awake, I would see people walk out disappointed. However, some people(mainly adults) would most likely appreciate its' interesting aspects and uniqueness. Overall, "Ad Astra" is a film not worthy to watch as it will most likely to come out on streaming services or sites that you can watch without wasting money or a movie ticket.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

6

Ricard0Sep 28, 2019

Película algo lenta, con una muy buena ambientación y potencial, pero con una historia demasiado sensilla y esenas algo forzadas. Además el mensaje final de la película no creo que sea del agrado de los amantes de la exploración espacial.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

0

inopinatusSep 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Excruciating, nails-down-the-blackboard stuff for anyone with a science education or familiarity with the works of Joseph Conrad or human behaviour. This hairdo edition of Heart of Darkness violates basic physics in practically every scene, and the storyline, far from reaching for the stars as the title might suggest, never gets past reaching for the mood stabiliser pills.

The narrative construction is ridiculous from start to finish, whether it's the confected "power surge" crisis, the moon pirates, the decades-long but oddly mundane exploratory mission, the Murderous Space Baboon (no, really), or the gross misunderstanding of Project Orion-style propulsion, and everything in between.

Brad Pitt's flat affect is ideal for portraying a man with a flat affect and unresolved issues with his father, but there's little depth of hidden feeling here.

The director intended for the film to feature "the most realistic depiction of space travel that's been put in a movie". Well, it ain't. It's one of the least realistic. The rocketry is drivel from start to finish. Konstantin Tsiolkovsky is turning in his grave. The depiction of orbital mechanics is not merely flawed; major plot elements of the film depend on them being radically different to real world physics.

There are three scenes with aerodynamic significance. In the first, where aerodynamics are used to create a false sense of danger, there isn't any real danger, and in the second and third, the director seems to be entirely unaware that in the real world the maneuvers depicted would be sensationally difficult, dangerous, and probably fatal.

The idea that a spaceship on interplanetary transfer can make a quick "stop" to board another one is as absurd as the (impossibly) brief transfer they were already making. Basically the director has assumed that humans can survive G-forces that would turn real people into smeared pulp.

The energy physics of the confected "crisis" involving "antimatter surges" is just invented babble.

The idea of traveling to Mars, in person just to radio Neptune is drivel. We already have bidirectional radios and relay stations reaching further.

The psychology of every crew depicted has more in common with schlocky sci-fi-horror video games than with real-world hiring practices. Basically it's your choice between steely-eyed-missile-men, or hopeless flakes that in a highly regulated society (such as that depicted) would never have been in a cockpit at all.

There isn't a single scene that stands up to a moment's scientific scrutiny. Comparisons with 2001, Gravity, or even Interstellar are just bunk.

There isn't a single scene of literary significance, either. Comparisons with Heart of Darkness are fair, but unlike Coppola's work, only negative ones. All the allegorical significance is clobbered by the effort to portray a character rather than a society.

In the end, it turns out that Ruth Negga's turn as a burned-out Martian is the only good thing in this film, and her outfit rocks.… Expand

8 of 16 users found this helpful88

All this user's reviews

4

johndoe2014Sep 28, 2019

There are dumb movies for smart people (i.e., raising arizona, borat, marx bros, etc) and then there are movies like this that seem smart, but only if you are not smart enough to recognize that almost nothing in it makes any sense -There are dumb movies for smart people (i.e., raising arizona, borat, marx bros, etc) and then there are movies like this that seem smart, but only if you are not smart enough to recognize that almost nothing in it makes any sense - scientifically, practically, emotionally, or on any other level. It is a visually beautiful film, Pitt does a fine job or acting, the concept is fine, but the space experience is silly, and the relationships are just plot driven. We really learn nothing about anyone in the story including Pitt, except that he thinks he should trust people more and wishes he could - not exactly profound ground there. What I would guess is that the writers were smart enough to know that what they were writing was dumbed-down, and the science was not even close to anything that would not inspire a real astronaut to laugh out loud at most of it, but they figured the average movie goer would not notice and would love - macho man goes to neptune. But it is an expensive missed opportunity to make a great movie just to make money.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

0

NakorenSep 28, 2019

I didn't actually know what film I am going to watch and after film I understood that I lost my money. I would say seriously nearly 6 people in cinema laughed, I also wanted to cry.
Film don't has bad picture. But it has very stupid plot. II didn't actually know what film I am going to watch and after film I understood that I lost my money. I would say seriously nearly 6 people in cinema laughed, I also wanted to cry.
Film don't has bad picture. But it has very stupid plot. I really don't know who think that it is good idea to sneak. Into the rocket in 5 minutes before launch and then kill all people inside ple inside… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

7

TheDiSep 28, 2019

Ad Astra, I would call as "Interstellar on minimal" Kind of similar plot, smaller action, different hero and story. It can be the same world just 5-10 years earlier. Pitt playing well, but sometimes there are scenery issues from my view. SomeAd Astra, I would call as "Interstellar on minimal" Kind of similar plot, smaller action, different hero and story. It can be the same world just 5-10 years earlier. Pitt playing well, but sometimes there are scenery issues from my view. Some actions and scenes are a little absurd. Overall it was a nice picture for me. I like the self voice of Pitt's character and his character.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

2

chi7891Sep 28, 2019

It’s a bad movie that had the potential to be decent but had a horrible editor. The editing was just so bad... the movie was an hour too long.

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

4

SergiopSep 28, 2019

There not much story and the picture is bad. I do not understand why Brad Pitt got involved in such a bad movie

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

3

T4NKESep 28, 2019

Hacía tiempo que no veía nada tan aburrido. Te pasas todo el tiempo esperando que pase algo, hasta que al final... sigue sin pasar nada.

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

6

GrassmannSep 28, 2019

Slow, nonsense, not original at all. Gets a 6 for the descent visual effects.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

8

HannahKSep 20, 2019

I felt compelled to write a short review after seeing some of the unjustified low scores. Pitt gives an arguably career best performance in an Oscar worthy movie. If you are a proper grown up, discerning Sci fi fan this one is for you.

14 of 24 users found this helpful1410

All this user's reviews

2

NerdsinriSep 27, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie starts... Amazing.... By the end I was angry that I wasted my time watching this. With a huge budget, great cast I had high hopes. Could this be another Martian type movie? Nope. Chew on some broken glass instead of seeing this movie. It will be more productive… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

1

KlebartSep 27, 2019

Poor science. No special effects. Tries to be something deep and meaningful but fails. Boring. I went in expecting little and I was still disappointed. Left the movie before the end. Too boring.

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

1

thebagginsSep 27, 2019

You wont be challenged by this movie, there's no science fiction here, but go and see it if you like Brad Pitt, dramas and a story of a guy with latent daddy issues. So mind-numbing. 1 point for out of focus space scenes.

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

4

tp122Sep 27, 2019

Some good moments, beautiful photography, but ultimately disappointing. Some ridiculous plot holes and long, dull, sleep-inducing stretches. Pitt is solid, but the character is uninteresting. I sat in the theater wishing I had a 'fastSome good moments, beautiful photography, but ultimately disappointing. Some ridiculous plot holes and long, dull, sleep-inducing stretches. Pitt is solid, but the character is uninteresting. I sat in the theater wishing I had a 'fast forward' button.… Expand

1 of 11 users found this helpful110

All this user's reviews

0

Catr3Sep 27, 2019

Mira esta peli es una mierda lenta floja y literal mente estoy escribiendo esto en el momento mas "Critico" de la peli
-1/10

3 of 18 users found this helpful315

All this user's reviews

5

DrStrangeLUgSep 27, 2019

This is son finds his father movie with a SciFi window dressing. It's trying to be like "The Martian", "Interstellar" or event "Moon" but doesnt manage it.

It's also too long - a lot of the movie is taken up with travel time or waiting timeThis is son finds his father movie with a SciFi window dressing. It's trying to be like "The Martian", "Interstellar" or event "Moon" but doesnt manage it.

It's also too long - a lot of the movie is taken up with travel time or waiting time that doesnt advance the plot. It needed either more story or a shorter duration.

I really got the feeling that the script needed another one or two iterations.… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

9

StevosSep 27, 2019

This is my kind of science fiction. Almost no gun or lasers, no aliens, just an excellent look at how the future could possibly look pumped up with a bit of planet saving action. Excellent when you look past a couple of minor and unnecessaryThis is my kind of science fiction. Almost no gun or lasers, no aliens, just an excellent look at how the future could possibly look pumped up with a bit of planet saving action. Excellent when you look past a couple of minor and unnecessary plot holes. Brad Pitt great as is futuristic imagery. I’ll recall this movie for a long time… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

2

RasgonSep 26, 2019

Aburrida. Absurda. Guion lleno de trampas y deus ex machina. Terrence Malick de Hacendado. Guion que no hay por dónde cogerlo. Trama absurda. Voz en off con carga filosófica nivel Mr Wonderful. Un despropósito.

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

8

gustavoriquelmeSep 26, 2019

Ad Astra is a magnificent film, being one of the best space adventures of the last years. With an amazing sound editing, stunning cinematography, a beautiful soundtrack, and an incredible performance by Brad Pitt as Roy McBride, it gives usAd Astra is a magnificent film, being one of the best space adventures of the last years. With an amazing sound editing, stunning cinematography, a beautiful soundtrack, and an incredible performance by Brad Pitt as Roy McBride, it gives us an astonishing journey through space.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

1

jimlockSep 26, 2019

The movie is terrible. Its one of the worst sci fi worlds put on screen. The setting is anything but realistic. 70s like rockets and old school moon rovers and suits simply to remind us of 1969 while humanity has dug immense tunnels bellow Mars...

7 of 17 users found this helpful710

All this user's reviews

Ad Astra

User Reviews