Read User Reviews and Submit your own for A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors

9

robertoiglesiasJan 13, 2018

God I love this film in this spectacular series. This one was creative and fun in it's own unique way.

20 of 21 users found this helpful201

All this user's reviews

9

AmoraApr 1, 2018

After part 2 had mixed reception, part 3 really did what fans wanted but added some new elements. It made Freddy scary, but also cracking a few dark humor jokes every once in a while, its totally one of the most entertaining installments inAfter part 2 had mixed reception, part 3 really did what fans wanted but added some new elements. It made Freddy scary, but also cracking a few dark humor jokes every once in a while, its totally one of the most entertaining installments in the series.… Expand

12 of 12 users found this helpful120

All this user's reviews

10

mlrivello16Sep 27, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Robert Englund is fantastic in his role as freddy per usual, and he should return again to the role. He is rumored to "have one more left".… Expand

10 of 10 users found this helpful100

All this user's reviews

10

Rcavey92212Mar 17, 2020

This was the movie that really made me a fan of the franchise when I was 8. I remember going to see it with my cousins, father and uncle in Colorado and I was just blown away. I thought Freddy, Nancy, Kristen and the rest of the dreamThis was the movie that really made me a fan of the franchise when I was 8. I remember going to see it with my cousins, father and uncle in Colorado and I was just blown away. I thought Freddy, Nancy, Kristen and the rest of the dream warriors were so cool. Especially Taryn played by the amazing Jennifer Rubin (Bad Dreams). In this chapter Krueger targets the last of the Elm st. Children who have gone crazy and been put into a mental institution. Even though it was only released three years after the first Nancy is supposed to be like ten years older and a grad school therapist. A young Laurence Fishburne (Matrix) also stars. This is the entry where Freddy really became a pop villain. He's still dark but he has just a bit more humor. The kills are fantastical and involved. The movie is filled with solid performances all around especially from Robert Englund delivering a perfect balance, Heather Lagenkamp and a young wonderful Patricia Arquette. The movie is confidently directed by Chuck Russell (Blob "88"). Its definitely one of the best entries innovative, creative, smart and most of all entertaining.

4.5/5

Budget: $4m
Domestic Box Office: $45m
Worldwide Box Office: $45m… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

8

JPKJul 4, 2019

Improvement On Two
The third film of this franchise is actually pretty good considering how mediocre the second one was.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Sosmooth1982Jan 5, 2023

My favorite out of the entire series. Nothing like going after a bunch of teens who are locked up in a psychiatric hospital for bad nightmares. Freddy has a field day with this one. Welcome to prime time ****

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

GeovannypiresJun 9, 2023

é o mais triste e aterrorizante de todos ,e tem o melhor fred as mortes ,a historia e a finalização e realmente muito bom.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Josephgamers65Jun 17, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A Nightmare on Elm Street 3 Dream Warriors is a nice return to the franchise Nancy Thompson returns in the movie also L.T Donald Thompson returns also. We are introduced to Kristen Parker in the first 15 minutes she is having trouble sleeping like in the last 2 movies we had she has a nightmare so she goes to the hospital with the other kids while Nancy is trying to help the other kids and Dr. Neil Gordon is trying to help also while one of the patients does not want to help or care to help them alright so the good in this movie is pretty much all the characters I had zero problems with the characters Freddy is amazing like usual what I noticed that max character is the acter Laurence I was surprised he was in this the kills are cool like the tv kill was cool that was is my fav in this movie Robert Englund is great as feddy I can't imagin someone else being freddy as I learned the reboot was the Robert Englund which probably tanks that movie anyway Robert Englund the mixed elements Dr. Elizabeth is annoying all she is doing is not believing the right thing to do to take down freddy also the ending drags again I don't why so far every film I watched in this franchise it drags that is annoying So all round a very good sequel to the franchise So I give A Nightmare on Elm Street 3 Dream Warriors an B+… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

WhiskeyStoriesSep 9, 2017

Dream Warriors had a pretty great concept. The return of Nancy was a neat idea, though her character was still lacking in my opinion. Some of the nightmare scenes were freaking grotesque and were at times on par with the original's andDream Warriors had a pretty great concept. The return of Nancy was a neat idea, though her character was still lacking in my opinion. Some of the nightmare scenes were freaking grotesque and were at times on par with the original's and technically the film is pretty amazing for it's time. Some of the newly introduced characters are very likable and have interestingly distinctive traits(like Jennifer Rubin as Taryn's drug problems and sassyness, Ken Sagoes as Kincaid's attitude and humour and Ira Heiden as Will's nerdyness and quirkyness). The film's quality suffers a bit from its era, the style of the 80's is completely overcharging and takes away the tenseness(unlike in the original Nightmare on Elm Street, which had a sense of dread), which made me take it less seriously, but made it a bit more fun in a cheesy 80's movie kind of way - It has it's own sweet glamrock anthem for crying out loud.

My major gripes with the movie are that the ending is kinda dumb and a bit uninspired(except for the skeleton fight scene, that was great) and that Patricia Arquette and Heather Langenkamp(still) are not great leads. Lastly, a minor gripe, Freddy's morbid humour adds to his character as a pop-culture icon, but it takes away from his scariness.… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

6

Meth-dudeSep 26, 2017

While this movie was definitely not as good as the previous two, it still managed to be pretty entertaining. The kills were more inventive and the story was interesting, but the movie was way more silly and the ending wasn't very good.While this movie was definitely not as good as the previous two, it still managed to be pretty entertaining. The kills were more inventive and the story was interesting, but the movie was way more silly and the ending wasn't very good. Disappointing to say the least...… Expand

0 of 10 users found this helpful010

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoApr 21, 2021

I really liked this film, as it seemed to me a sequel that honors and resonates with the original film. In this film, Freddy Krueger goes back to attack the dreams of the Elm Street teens, but this time they're able to give him a fight. TheI really liked this film, as it seemed to me a sequel that honors and resonates with the original film. In this film, Freddy Krueger goes back to attack the dreams of the Elm Street teens, but this time they're able to give him a fight. The film does not disappoint the franchise fans and brings everything that is required, including blood, gore and rather macabre scenes, especially towards the end.

The cast does its job satisfactorily. Robert Englund is impeccable in the role of the iconic villain, Heather Langenkamp is perfect for the protagonist and Craig Wasson, Patricia Arquette, Ken Sagoes and Rodney Eastman secure the most important supporting characters with confidence and reasonable results. It is not an exceptional work, there are failures and moments when the actors sound excessively cliché, but I think that some of those failures may be due to bad lines and dialogues, and not so much to the effort of the actors themselves.

Technically, it is a very well-made film and appears to have a lot of money invested. CGI and special effects are quite good and worked very well, especially the skeleton. Englund's make-up also looks more realistic and detailed than in other older films, and that makes it clearer, more disturbing and impactful. There is some room for pleasant black humor, but the film is genuinely tense and the suspense was built in a coherent and skillful manner. Dark cinematography with strong colors helps, at the right times, to accentuate this tension, and the soundtrack also plays an honorable role.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

I_loveJan 3, 2019

At time was unintentionally funny, cheesy, and some bad affects, other than that a good sequel

0 of 10 users found this helpful010

All this user's reviews

1

JonSnow2049Aug 20, 2019

This is some kind of crazy mess. Not scary, not funny, not interesting. Picking up where NIGHTMARE 3 left off, we see the three surviving teenage Dream Warriors suddenly being plagued
in their dreams by the supposedly dead and buried FreddyThis is some kind of crazy mess. Not scary, not funny, not interesting. Picking up where NIGHTMARE 3 left off, we see the three surviving teenage Dream Warriors suddenly being plagued
in their dreams by the supposedly dead and buried Freddy (Robert Englund), who is now moving into new territory and invading the dreams of mousy teen Alice (Lisa Wilcox). What the child-killer doesn't anticipate, however, is that Alice begins taking on the strongest characteristics of her friends
and soon becomes a complete Dream Warrior blessed with impressive athletic prowess, physical strength, and intelligence.… Expand

0 of 13 users found this helpful013

All this user's reviews

7

HabibiehakimJul 30, 2022

A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is definitely and simply better than the sequel and it's one of those rare cases of a not awful third installment specifically the one that still made in the 80s, and while it's better in story,A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is definitely and simply better than the sequel and it's one of those rare cases of a not awful third installment specifically the one that still made in the 80s, and while it's better in story, better in performance, better in characters added with the return of Heather Langenkamp really make it even better because she is Nancy Thompson and the first movie was a true classic and one of the reason is because of her, being better doesn't mean is great or good, in this case i though the overall product was just an ok new haunting ride with Freddy Krueger that are still quite fun and entertaining to watch for the most part, the story is better but it's not like the greatest or the best story too, it was an ok story, so do all the performance, there is always still a nit picky here and there, but like the previous movie i was still enjoying all the creative practical and special effect that they did with this one, so overall (like i specifically wrote before) A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is an ok new haunting ride with Freddy Krueger that are still quite fun and entertaining to watch for the most part.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

HellHoleHorrorFeb 16, 2022

Dream warriors my a**. How stupid is that? Having a war in your dreams. Just like America is doing now. The movie is utter insanity and that is how I got some enjoyment from it. I learnt that any movie with a metronome in really sucks. AtDream warriors my a**. How stupid is that? Having a war in your dreams. Just like America is doing now. The movie is utter insanity and that is how I got some enjoyment from it. I learnt that any movie with a metronome in really sucks. At least no-one got pregnant. Told some more of the story but lacked anything exceptional.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

royalguy07Oct 18, 2022

"Welcome to prime time, **** Freddy is awesome in this. Some fun kills and great practical effects. A very fun and rewarding 3rd act.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

YasmimCristinaJun 9, 2023

é muito triste mas lindo no final,é realmente um perola dos filmes de terror dos anos 80 .

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

ComandanteCobraJul 23, 2021

Classic 80's horror movie, where actions , comedy and a (little) scares blend togeter.
Watchable by young adults (But check Rating) because violence is fictional.
Classic VHS for Halloween party...for those of you that where young in the 80's