2001: A Space Odyssey
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) | Release Date: April 2, 1968
8.2
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1319 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,086
Mixed:
79
Negative:
154
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
ScorsescockFeb 1, 2018
This film you might not get on the first watch but it all comes together it's truly amazing. it uses visual storytelling and little dialogue to show exactly what's happening and provide a deep hidden message about change both good and bad.This film you might not get on the first watch but it all comes together it's truly amazing. it uses visual storytelling and little dialogue to show exactly what's happening and provide a deep hidden message about change both good and bad. P.S. best special effects ever.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
CTHReviewsFeb 1, 2018
2001: A Space Odyssey is a cinematic, science fiction masterpiece. I had so many questions when I first watched it, and I still do now.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
theCRITIC2May 21, 2018
I hate how this movie doesn't have a score of 100 here in Metacritic. This movie is I think one of the best films ever created (if not the best). If you're criticizing this film because it's not entertaining and it's boring, you're doing itI hate how this movie doesn't have a score of 100 here in Metacritic. This movie is I think one of the best films ever created (if not the best). If you're criticizing this film because it's not entertaining and it's boring, you're doing it wrong. This film is not supposed to be entertaining, this film is the testimony of the future, an allegory in other terms. The shot of this film from beginning up to the ending is marvelous (especially the ending sequence). There was no scene in this where I wasn't amazed by the cinematography, every scene is a painting. Stanley Kubrick is truly one of the best directors of all time to have ever lived and I think this is his best work throughout his entire life. The soundtrack of this film is also great like the use Also Sprach Zarathustra: Einleitung at the opening and at the ending of film or the use of the Waltz on the Blue Danube or even the breathing sound which some have said that Kubrick himself recorded is astounding.
You could argue that every actor in this film feels robotic and that is actually one of the points of this film, technology has taken and driven us to the point that we ourselves are robotic in many ways. This film influence the Sci-Fi genre (which would influence George Lucas in his film Star Wars 9 years later) and in fact not only the genre, but also the whole film industry. This film is as genius is as genius as the one who directed it. I love this film so much, go watch this if you haven't but don't go watch this like something entertaining or just your regular pastimes, watch this like you're viewing a series of paintings painted by Kubrick himself and also a poetic testimony of what future could bring to the existence of humanity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
LivingTribunalJul 11, 2020
This movie itself is a Monolith of the movie industry. I've watched many classics, but this is on whole other level.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
cameronhalmansJan 9, 2019
Rich with symbolism and outstanding visual effects/cinematography, 2001: A Space Odyssey transcends time. Confusing yes, but once you understand Kubricks vision, this film clicks. 100/100
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
mrafrotastic00Jun 2, 2018
Cinematic Masterpieces: 2001: A Space Odyssey. Starring: Keir Dullea. Gary Lockwood. Douglas Rain. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. No one has ever experienced a film like "2001: A Space Odyssey." Science-fiction moviesCinematic Masterpieces: 2001: A Space Odyssey. Starring: Keir Dullea. Gary Lockwood. Douglas Rain. Directed by Stanley Kubrick. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. No one has ever experienced a film like "2001: A Space Odyssey." Science-fiction movies have tried to be as profound as Kubrick's masterpiece, but they lack an elaborately complex theme. To contemplate that this motion picture was released in 1968, fifty years ago, conveys how Kubrick's film is a stunning achievement. "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a creepily breathtaking meditation on mankind from an evolutionary perspective; the film score and cinematography exude an unsettling atmosphere for audiences. Stanley Kubrick is the real star of this motion picture, because he was able to establish a revolutionary film with the help of a superb cast and crew. From the opening sequence to the wicked conclusion, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a ravishing, sophisticated study of humanity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MattJacks2003Mar 9, 2019
This movie has all lovely and sexy pieces of music and this movie is pretty damn fascinating.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Filmix16Mar 19, 2019
Un scénario original.Des effets bien réussit pour un film de 1969.Stanley Kubrics offre sa meilleure adaptation au cinéma.Une trame sonore incroyable.Des idées mémorables.Les acteurs sont bons comme ils devraient êtres.La direction photo estUn scénario original.Des effets bien réussit pour un film de 1969.Stanley Kubrics offre sa meilleure adaptation au cinéma.Une trame sonore incroyable.Des idées mémorables.Les acteurs sont bons comme ils devraient êtres.La direction photo est superbe.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Will_PalmerApr 26, 2019
This movie is truly astounding, the leaps made by this film cannot be understated. Stanley Kubrick shines in the definitive sci-fi movie before star wars. It is ingenious with long drawn out, silent, speechless sequences. Which explain moreThis movie is truly astounding, the leaps made by this film cannot be understated. Stanley Kubrick shines in the definitive sci-fi movie before star wars. It is ingenious with long drawn out, silent, speechless sequences. Which explain more through symbolism and imagery than any other movie could with dialogue. It is a testament to the movie franchise and cinema today wouldn't be the same if it wasn't made.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DwayneHernandeAug 13, 2019
In my opinion the great film ever made. This is art. From the technical skills to the themes and motifs nothing can match 2001 in my opinion. Citizen Kane asks good questions central to the meaning of life of a man, but 2001 asks us to ponderIn my opinion the great film ever made. This is art. From the technical skills to the themes and motifs nothing can match 2001 in my opinion. Citizen Kane asks good questions central to the meaning of life of a man, but 2001 asks us to ponder not just our lives but our very place in the vast cosmos. The film is long, but you won't look at the watch at all. The cinematography is still so good it is hard to imagine this is a 50-year-old film. Keir Dullea is great as the center stage in a mainly special effects laden film, but such is his composure that we the audience associate with him solely, against the backdrop of the cold, inconsiderate blackness of space and high tech. Thus Spake Zarathustra will forever be associated with this great film and the soundtrack is so good in complementing its subject one cannot imagine the film without it. Above all 2001 A Space Odyssey is the work child of a genius(The greatest motion picture ever, all things considered)… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
JamedrisApr 10, 2019
One of those mind-blowing movie that left you amazed and you want to tell your friends about it as soon as possible, but you know that most of them will not appreciate it in the way you did. I had two or three approaches but I am more thanOne of those mind-blowing movie that left you amazed and you want to tell your friends about it as soon as possible, but you know that most of them will not appreciate it in the way you did. I had two or three approaches but I am more than glad that I did decide to watch it. Any cinema fan should see it, even despite for the classic-role of this title. Also, HAL = IBM -1 letter each, but y'all know this. :) +fav… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
WillemJApr 28, 2019
Kubrick's 2001 is a classic that should be shown in history classes. It's soundtrack played in music lessons. And even more, be playing in all theaters once a year - to show any upcoming filmmaker the true way of making a great picture. It'sKubrick's 2001 is a classic that should be shown in history classes. It's soundtrack played in music lessons. And even more, be playing in all theaters once a year - to show any upcoming filmmaker the true way of making a great picture. It's from the 60s but it easily outstands todays Hollywood's flicks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ChristianTianApr 28, 2019
2001: A Space Odyssey is visual poetry, and like great poetry it demands something from you. Stanley Kubrick created films for people who seek more than escapist entertainment, and with 2001 he gave us an audacious conceit that is staggering2001: A Space Odyssey is visual poetry, and like great poetry it demands something from you. Stanley Kubrick created films for people who seek more than escapist entertainment, and with 2001 he gave us an audacious conceit that is staggering in its ambition, representing through film the 'Cosmic Ascension' with the utmost gravitas. There is real beauty in 2001 akin to the great masters of painting. The famous 'Space Ballet' is the most beautiful sequence in film history and it predates the age of computer graphics. It not only withstands today's visual standards in a technical sense, but contemporary filmmakers have yet to surpass its intense detail and realism. So much of the story exists visually, something film audiences may find disconcerting, but if you disconnect from the realm of motherhood and apple pie and answer to the demands made of you, you may find rich rewards. Within its grand scope and immeasurable odds, 2001 tells us a story: the story of evolution. The first monolith inspires apes to use tools as a violent means to justify ends; the second monolith motivates men to pursue a mysterious radio signal into the cold, dark, vacuum of space; and the third monolith pulls Dave through the stargate, across vast oceans of time and space, where upon his last dying breath, he reaches toward it one final time before his rebirth as the starchild, marking the ultimate phase in human evolution: to a being of pure energy and spirit with limitless capabilities and ungraspable intelligence, and the savior of humanity.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
branflakes4547Jun 25, 2019
Absolutely incredible. It is so rare that a movie blows me away time and time again, but this movie captures my attention immediately and never ceases to let go. I saw it 5 times before seeing it in theaters, and even for the sixth andAbsolutely incredible. It is so rare that a movie blows me away time and time again, but this movie captures my attention immediately and never ceases to let go. I saw it 5 times before seeing it in theaters, and even for the sixth and seventh time in a theater it blew me away. Probably the pinnacle of film making, and I do not believe it will ever be topped. It is certainly not for everybody, and there is no problem with that. But speaking for myself it is the bar to be reached by anyone and everyone in the coming decades. The cinematography, the sound design, the lighting, the acting, the writing, the production design (also the same person that did the special effects for the original star wars), literally everything about this film except possibly the pacing is just completely masterful. Definitely a movie everybody should see. If you don't like it, well that's okay, the average modern moviegoer will not be impressed. But if you like it, watch it again, and you will enjoy it just as much as every time preceding it. 110% mindboggling, and I do not use that term lightly. My jaw was on the floor, even on the seventh viewing. Always new stuff to uncover with this film… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MahmusSep 25, 2020
2001: A Space Odyssey is a miracle.
A thought-provoking exploration of the mankind's place in the universe, but most surprisingly, an incredibly entertaining and endlessly rewatchable audio-visual experience, despite its slow pace.
This2001: A Space Odyssey is a miracle.
A thought-provoking exploration of the mankind's place in the universe, but most surprisingly, an incredibly entertaining and endlessly rewatchable audio-visual experience, despite its slow pace.

This movie keeps my eyes glued to the screen for its whole runtime. Through the long sequence of ships moving through space, through the seemingly endless stargate sequence, even when it's literally just a black screen, I'm hooked; hypnotized, entranced. Once it's starts, there's no going back.

This movie came out in 1968 and it still holds up. The effects are some of the best of all time. The sound is terrifying. The visuals are stunning.

This is easily one of the most beautiful films ever. Everything comes together so perfectly. Lighting, set design, costumes, special effects, music, colors, sound, editing; It's all cinematic perfection.

This is the ultimate Sci-fi film.
One of the few movies that I would call Perfect.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
jakepanek0125Sep 15, 2019
The single greatest achievement in the history of cinema - maybe even in general. A profound, striking film. MASTERPIECE
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
FRETIYRApr 28, 2020
An EPIC movie, by Stanley Kubrick and yet is one of the greatest movies of all time, might not predicted the future but still is amazing to watch
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Louw_BurgerApr 4, 2020
One of the most influential of all sci-fi films -- and one of the most controversial -- Stanley Kubrick's 2001 is a delicate, poetic meditation on the ingenuity -- and folly -- of mankind.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
ZiphiasFeb 20, 2021
The greatest film ever made. It tells a profound story of humanity and evolution. It completely blew me away on first watch and it was engaging all the way through. Even though I hate the word, this is a so-called masterpiece and perhaps theThe greatest film ever made. It tells a profound story of humanity and evolution. It completely blew me away on first watch and it was engaging all the way through. Even though I hate the word, this is a so-called masterpiece and perhaps the greatest of such.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ShonnakanJul 26, 2020
A dazzling movie whose ambitions lie as high as the stars...... 2001 : A Space Odyssey by Stanley Kubrick is a revolutionary movie. The visual effects used in this movie still holds up after 52 years of release.The storytelling is subtle andA dazzling movie whose ambitions lie as high as the stars...... 2001 : A Space Odyssey by Stanley Kubrick is a revolutionary movie. The visual effects used in this movie still holds up after 52 years of release.The storytelling is subtle and requires a lot of attention and thought. Not everyone
will understand the intentions of this movie but if you do, this movie will grow on you and never leave your mind......… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
abrarqadirJul 21, 2020
2001 is Not my favorite Kubrick film, but I would feel silly if I didn't acknowledge it as Kubrick's best. 2001 must be on the short list for best Movie of all time. This is despite the fact that the movie is undeniably boring. But slowly2001 is Not my favorite Kubrick film, but I would feel silly if I didn't acknowledge it as Kubrick's best. 2001 must be on the short list for best Movie of all time. This is despite the fact that the movie is undeniably boring. But slowly hurtling through space could be nothing but boring, which only adds to the iconic realism. It is unendingly shocking that this movie was made in the 60's, and yet manages to stand head and shoulders above any other movie's representation of living in the dark vastness of space. Even Interstellar ends up feeling somewhat childish after seeing this. The 2 astronaut leads may seem "cold and distant" but are exactly what someone in their position would be. The celestial ballet Kubrick manages to convey/visualize is certainly spiritual in nature, even if no religious thought sits behind it. This film's prescience in visualizing the future (i.e. now - the present) is stupefying. The "Hal" storyline holds as much suspense as a Hitchcock movie. I was underwhelmed by the very end of the film, but I have also come to believe that Kubrick is both bad at, and apathetic to, the art of ending movies. I don't think he finds any joy in the end of movies, and it shows. But even certifiable flaws cannot upend this movie's clear status as 21st Century Masterpiece.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SeyeerGameFeb 25, 2022
при просмотре данного шедевра, у меня возникло сильное желание завести себе домашнюю обезьяну
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DipkhatiwadaMar 24, 2021
Cinema's biggest achievement . One of the hypnotic films with some of the best special effects ever
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Edgy_666Dec 26, 2020
Bluffing! A real aesthetic slap in the face! Of a nameless beauty. With amazing special effects.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Amirhosein2005Jul 4, 2021
An extremely amazing and wonderful film that is considered one of the greatest science fiction films. A film that closes the mouths and captivates the eyes! It is definitely amazing to see a film about the evolution of human beings with aAn extremely amazing and wonderful film that is considered one of the greatest science fiction films. A film that closes the mouths and captivates the eyes! It is definitely amazing to see a film about the evolution of human beings with a very beautiful visual style of the 60's!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
EdReviewMay 21, 2023
2001: A Space Odyssey is not just a science-fiction film, it is THE science-fiction film par excellance.
All sci-fi films released after 1968 owe something to it.
This film is mesmerizing and it glues you to the screen with extraordinary2001: A Space Odyssey is not just a science-fiction film, it is THE science-fiction film par excellance.
All sci-fi films released after 1968 owe something to it.
This film is mesmerizing and it glues you to the screen with extraordinary shots that show just how visionary Kubrick was. Its slow pace can be tedious for some people, but I really don't consider it a flaw. If I really have to find a downside, it is that over the course of the film it's impossibile to become emotionally attached to the characters, because they are not so developed. 2001: A Space Odyssey is the film that showed how science-fiction cinema can be great cinema.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Abso_lute1Jul 14, 2021
A beautiful and mesmerizing piece of cinema that is undeniably a masterpiece as well as very subtle.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021
Amazing. I wish I could summarize my experience of Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" using one word, but that is unfeasible. Sure, I typed ‘Amazing' as the one opening word of this review, but it is an understatement because KubrickAmazing. I wish I could summarize my experience of Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" using one word, but that is unfeasible. Sure, I typed ‘Amazing' as the one opening word of this review, but it is an understatement because Kubrick has boldly sculptured a magnificently ambitious work of art which continues to innovate filmmaking, challenge audience expectations and perceptions, and welcome intellectual discussions about its subject matter. If I could award a film that goes above and beyond a five star rating, this would be it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NickTheCritickMar 28, 2022
One of those masterpieces that you can hardly explain in words. Any word spoke to describe this movie may just be superfluous. This film is light years ahead of its time, still modern today and, in hindsight, frighteningly predictive. One ofOne of those masterpieces that you can hardly explain in words. Any word spoke to describe this movie may just be superfluous. This film is light years ahead of its time, still modern today and, in hindsight, frighteningly predictive. One of the greatest films ever shot by one of the greatest directors ever.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
Arthur2021Nov 21, 2021
The best movie about space I’ve ever seen.I assure you by watching it you won’t be disappointed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JayCasparDec 21, 2021
A Masterpiece? Yes.

Groundbreaking? Yes.

Beautiful? Yes.

The best science fiction Film ever made? No.

No, because I don't believe in Imperialism.


A must see? Most definitely.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ChoppersBagFeb 28, 2022
There are not many words I can use to describe this film but I will say this: 2001: A Space Odyssey is a masterpiece, Amazing Story, Incredible Cinematography, and a soundtrack that you won't be able to get out of your head for months.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Raiden301Sep 18, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. When I first tried watching 2001, I thought it was the most boring movie ever. You just want Hal to show up and cause trouble but instead you're dealing with monkeys for 15 minutes. On my second viewing something about the film clicked and I found it to be one of the most beautiful films I've ever seen. While the classic theme of the film can come off as silly when the money sashes a bone onto the skeletal remains of a mammoth. The music genuinely carries other parts of the film later. For example the entire first half is mostly silence, with the addition of classical music as we're shown off all the spectacular effects Kubrick has painstakingly created. The story mostly comes in slowly until the introduction of Dave and Hal, who develop an interesting dynamic, which becomes a total opposition to each other by the end. Hal himself is one of the best representations of the artificial intelligence concept, from the clear pride he displays in his voice, to his desperate peas by then end of his story, he encapsulates all sorts of human emotion throughout his time.in the film. The ending becomes a different story all together with dave gaining a weather of knowledge that turns the film into an lsd trip. While many people might think this last segment of the film means nothing, to me it means everything. I don't necessarily want to say what my interpretation is, because I think this is a scene you should see without any influences on what to think or feel about it. Regardless Kubrick's 2001, is one of the greatest achievements in film without a doubt. I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to experience a different type of film that's more comfortable with visually conveying it's ideas to you then any real character interaction. It's beautiful and please watch it… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Maxisgoat1717Apr 9, 2023
Why it rocks: A very revolutionary film. A film that really made you think about yourself. 2001 makes you think about the endless vacuum of space and the horrors of our own technology. The first time viewing this is unlike anything I’ve everWhy it rocks: A very revolutionary film. A film that really made you think about yourself. 2001 makes you think about the endless vacuum of space and the horrors of our own technology. The first time viewing this is unlike anything I’ve ever experienced in my life. It felt like I was watching the movie of the universe. It was something I’ll never experience again.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ChleoslJun 16, 2023
"Movie" is an "Expression". and this movie had expressed the original, universal value for entire humanity, eternity beyond trinity. the transcends of individual intelligence, society intelligence, (our) real genuine to it's intellect own,"Movie" is an "Expression". and this movie had expressed the original, universal value for entire humanity, eternity beyond trinity. the transcends of individual intelligence, society intelligence, (our) real genuine to it's intellect own, existing as intelligence itself; showing our future, genuinely.

The looking of advancement and omnipresentic value of existing intelligence, on the existing universe. In the perspective of human, to the universal value of us and beyond intellectual bodies.

my all time favorite.
pure aesthetics form of value universal.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ChrisNortonAug 7, 2023
A near perfect movie, one of the greatest films of all time. Should be on everyone's top ten list of all time. To say this film was beyond its time in 1968 is an understatement from its technicality, set design, execution of every shot - it'sA near perfect movie, one of the greatest films of all time. Should be on everyone's top ten list of all time. To say this film was beyond its time in 1968 is an understatement from its technicality, set design, execution of every shot - it's all some of the best you'll ever see and will leave you in complete awe. It's a film that is everlasting in time and will make you question what is the meaning of life and what is out there? It also somehow predicts at some point a machine created by man can also create its own ego and conflict with that man, meaning life or death and the struggle for our existence of both. At the end it also might say does the struggle for existence really matter? And by how much? I can only imagine when this film originally came out the conversations it spawned from it's accompanied viewers and it will continue to inspire that forever.

Setting, Conflict, Character, Dialogue, Theme, Plot, and Climax: A+

Runtime: 2:29

Audience Engagement (do you feel runtime): No

Top Genres: Adventure, Sci-Fi (Fiction)

Genre(s) rating Adventure - 9 Sci-Fi- 10

Genre Average Score: 9.5 Directing: 10 Cinematography/lighting: 10 Story/Narrative: 10 Structure: 9 Dialogue: 10 Score(music): 10 Editing: 10 Acting: 10 Characterization: 8 Mise en Scène/Visual Design: 10 Visual Effects: 10 Sound Design: 10 Costumes/Makeup: 10 Lasting Impact: 10 Originality: 10

Overall: 9.78… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
RobertR.Dec 9, 2006
This movie is probably the only of its kind. It is the kind of movie that combines wacky ideas with serious and realistic scenes. An incredible picture. Nobody could have done this better than Stanley Kubrick. One of the things I liked best This movie is probably the only of its kind. It is the kind of movie that combines wacky ideas with serious and realistic scenes. An incredible picture. Nobody could have done this better than Stanley Kubrick. One of the things I liked best was the slowness, and how there were 5-minute scenes just of a space pod departing from the ship. Kubrick is able to realistically portray outer space, and to create a beautiful film.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
9
WakoJ.May 7, 2006
Finally saw this flick and finally understand what all the fuss is about, from those who love it and from those who hate it. For my part, I mostly appreciated this as one is apt to appreciate an awe inspiring work of art. I liked it more Finally saw this flick and finally understand what all the fuss is about, from those who love it and from those who hate it. For my part, I mostly appreciated this as one is apt to appreciate an awe inspiring work of art. I liked it more after doing some reading on it, guess I'm not smart enough to figure everything out by myself. Perhaps that is the point of the movie, and the best advice I can give: don't try to figure it out too much. In time things will sink in and bring different meanings to different people, the way all great art does.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
TokyochuchuOct 10, 2012
2001: A Space Odyssey is an amazing science fiction film with astonishing, timeless effects. The movie manages to be quite terrifying without the use of action sequences or monsters (as is the want of modern sci-fi). Fear and wonder of the2001: A Space Odyssey is an amazing science fiction film with astonishing, timeless effects. The movie manages to be quite terrifying without the use of action sequences or monsters (as is the want of modern sci-fi). Fear and wonder of the unknown makes for quite the potent mix. I love the fact that the ending is so inscrutable. It leaves you startled and uneasy with a total lack of understanding. But that's the way the universe is; totally beyond our understanding.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
9
EdwinApr 9, 2014
The grandaddy of sci-fi, an incomparable experience of sense and of mind. Best to approach the revelationary details of the book afterwards, allowing Kubrick's sense of style and majesty to pervade the inner mind.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
SilverManOct 7, 2012
It doesnt make any sense!!!! It's hard to understand the story, and it's too long and it has some unnecessary parts, therefore it looks like they prefer the worst scenes. I just gave it a 9 becuase this is not a movie, it is a psychdelicIt doesnt make any sense!!!! It's hard to understand the story, and it's too long and it has some unnecessary parts, therefore it looks like they prefer the worst scenes. I just gave it a 9 becuase this is not a movie, it is a psychdelic experience, a outrageous epiphany. It must be aprecciated with patience and open-mind.… Expand
1 of 7 users found this helpful16
All this user's reviews
9
EnricoDandoloMar 23, 2014
Beautiful, deep and mind-blowing, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is definitely a film that needs reconsideration before blind criticism over its plot. The story is not linear and simple, but piled with lots of metaphors and symbols. The use of musicBeautiful, deep and mind-blowing, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is definitely a film that needs reconsideration before blind criticism over its plot. The story is not linear and simple, but piled with lots of metaphors and symbols. The use of music is absolutely fantastic. I recommend it to everyone who loves to argue about philosophical topics and to everyone who just really like movies.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
GHarrisonDec 24, 2017
Visually exceptional masterpiece with a soundtrack so fantastic its usage has become cliché. Dramatic, intense, iconic and truly incredible to think it's almost half a century old. For me Clive, Kubrick's finest.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Joao452364Jan 3, 2017
Um Filme que quebra todas as barreiras de como fazer um bom Sci-Fi, 2001: Uma odisseia no espaço traz tudo de melhor que um Sci-Fi precisa ter: Um roteiro emocionante e denso, e efeitos visuais maravilhosos, que são reforçados pela fotografiaUm Filme que quebra todas as barreiras de como fazer um bom Sci-Fi, 2001: Uma odisseia no espaço traz tudo de melhor que um Sci-Fi precisa ter: Um roteiro emocionante e denso, e efeitos visuais maravilhosos, que são reforçados pela fotografia e Mixagem de som.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
VirgonoShakaMay 26, 2018
2001: A Space odessey is one of the fundamentals of Sci-fi and I can definitely say that it is honor well deserved. Not only it has some incredible effects for it's time, but the way the story starts, and how it uses it's dialogues, silence2001: A Space odessey is one of the fundamentals of Sci-fi and I can definitely say that it is honor well deserved. Not only it has some incredible effects for it's time, but the way the story starts, and how it uses it's dialogues, silence and music to convey it's message is superb. My only gripe would be that the last scene is maybe a tad bit too long and can be hard on the eyes. But other than that, this is one journey that everyone, not matter where they come from, should embark in.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AkumaJackJun 6, 2018
2001: A space odyssey is the definition of Masterpiece. Although is a very slow paced movie it has one of the best directing i've ever seen. The Soundtrack is perfect and the whole "plot" is very meaningful. This film is so deep that will2001: A space odyssey is the definition of Masterpiece. Although is a very slow paced movie it has one of the best directing i've ever seen. The Soundtrack is perfect and the whole "plot" is very meaningful. This film is so deep that will tell you more about yourself that any other piece of art you'll ever experience.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(93/100)
Stanley YOU ARE MY HERO! This movie is one of my favorite sci-fi movies of all time.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
DawdlingPoetNov 20, 2021
I found this to be quite an impressive film - not so much in terms of amazing special effects but moreso the absorbing mix of music used with the symbolism behind the visuals. Its quite old fashioned looking nowadays but then, of course, theI found this to be quite an impressive film - not so much in terms of amazing special effects but moreso the absorbing mix of music used with the symbolism behind the visuals. Its quite old fashioned looking nowadays but then, of course, the film dates from the late 1960s so thats hardly surprising, more inevitable. As others have, I believe, argued, it feels very relevant in modern day society, I say that with my thought being the main themes present, which I'd say are isolation, humanity (the future of) and within that, community (the importance of community), plus of course our reliance on technology.

It wouldn't feel quite so impactful if it weren't for the stirring use/placement of classical music. Its a very atmospheric film I'd say and I liked that I could hear the more mechanical, automated type noises in the background of scenes, reminding us that technology is relied upon to keep the spacecraft operating, adding to the artificial or sterile feel to the place, which in this instance is good, as unlike in other films, it (to me) felt genuinely unnerving, how close to the perceived environment the viewer felt through the use of sound and music. There are times when there's no dialogue and all that can be heard is, for example, the sound of oxygen flowing into a spacesuit, to keep the person alive while investigating outside the vessel.

There is definitely a feel of 'big brother' about it - with the computer device HAL 9000 being the inbuilt 'voice of technological reason' you could say. That voice being quite unemotional, quite matter-of-fact (you could say, robotic, funnily enough). There is something unsettling about that somehow. I thought it was interesting how said device/being seemingly challenged the humans/astronauts on board by making some potentially challenging observations and raising questions. I felt it was a well thought out script and it inevitably was quite thought provoking, in terms of me wondering where society is heading in the medium term. I find it hard to imagine we'll all routinely be in space but then no doubt people would find it very hard to believe we could interact with others by video screens in real time as is shown on this film released in the late 60s and that is now possible via iPhones and Facetime and the like.

I noted the use of what seemed to me like pinhole camera angles/shots used, whereby the viewer only sees the middle of the image, or at other times around the sort of border of the shot the surroundings appear to be pointing inwards. This added to the sense of claustrophobia, I felt. I'd say there's almost a hypnotic sense to it.

I was just watching this at home on a smallish (under 28 inch) screen but yet I felt surprisingly engrossed in it and I quite enjoyed it - its certainly one of the better sci-fi films I've seen, so I'd happily recommend it and give it a high star rating.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Onlyclassicvg1Feb 18, 2021
2001: A Space Odyssey is a countdown to tomorrow, a road map to human destiny, a quest for the infinite. To begin his voyage into the future, Kubrick visits our prehistoric ape-ancestry past, then leaps millenia (via one of the most2001: A Space Odyssey is a countdown to tomorrow, a road map to human destiny, a quest for the infinite. To begin his voyage into the future, Kubrick visits our prehistoric ape-ancestry past, then leaps millenia (via one of the most mind-blowing jump cuts ever conceived) into colonized space, and ultimately whisks astronaut Bowman (Dulle… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AJ_13Jan 11, 2021
This film is one of the infinite reasons why Kubrick was way ahead of his time. The cinematography and OST are stunning. Nevertheless it may be a bit slow and its ending practically cant be understood unless you search an explanation for it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
tonyGreenJul 15, 2011
A film way ahead of it's time, it's scarcely beleivable it was made in 1968. The pace is slow and there is an excess of kubrickian unease, but for originality and visual impact this is a winner. There is a lot of thought-povoking material here
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
FIlmsareawesomeSep 22, 2011
Such a Interesting idea, Jupiter and the infinite, and the mission and all those segments, unfortunately, when this was passed to a movie, it got a little bit boring and without action, I mean don't get me wrong i liked the movie, for thatSuch a Interesting idea, Jupiter and the infinite, and the mission and all those segments, unfortunately, when this was passed to a movie, it got a little bit boring and without action, I mean don't get me wrong i liked the movie, for that time, this was a very big step into the industry, but it should have been more interesting, like not only showing a lot of images and stuff, but like a little bit more action . I though the dialogues between Bowman & Hal were very well written, the idea of a automatically computer was awesome and very well structured. So once again Stanley Kubrick did a very good job, and this time he did the whole thing, not only the writing and the directing, but also the special effects, like wow.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
grandpajoe6191Oct 6, 2011
Acclaimed director Stanley Kubrick's SF masterpiece "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a conservative movie, asking the audience not to be amazed by the extraordinary visuals but the maturity and growth of a universal subject. The climax of the movieAcclaimed director Stanley Kubrick's SF masterpiece "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a conservative movie, asking the audience not to be amazed by the extraordinary visuals but the maturity and growth of a universal subject. The climax of the movie speeds up consistently and precisely with the breath taking cinematography of silence,and in the end....the movie itself becomes the universal subject.… Expand
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
8
House0fWolves_Dec 16, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Some parts were extremely interesting, some were hard to sit through. The color sequence that lasted ten minutes and the long first stage of evolution with the primates were definitely both my favorite parts of the film. The ending was confusing and awful, in my opinion. It left me wondering why they would end a film with that much potential like a premature fetus.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JLLorenJan 2, 2013
An amazing cinematic experience that engages the viewer with its visuals. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
SpangleJul 9, 2014
This film is fantastic. Now, it is very, very slow and can be a tad dull for sure, but for the most part, it is wraps you up and refuses to let go. The imagery is immaculate and you can see Kubrick's trademark cinematography here and it isThis film is fantastic. Now, it is very, very slow and can be a tad dull for sure, but for the most part, it is wraps you up and refuses to let go. The imagery is immaculate and you can see Kubrick's trademark cinematography here and it is absolutely gorgeous. It was hard to pick my jaw up from the floor at times when seeing the beautiful images he managed to construct. In addition, the special effects are phenomenal. For 2014 they are great, let alone for 1968. Just absolutely stunning to watch. The sets are also brilliantly put together. In terms of sound, the soundtrack is phenomenal and is a great companion to the images. The acting here is solid, but that was all that was required, as there is not that much dialogue where acting is crucial, but they were competent and in the more dialogue carried sequences did well. This film is undoubtedly tough to grasp after watching it, but there is certainly more going on than meets the eye. However, what does meet the eye is the brilliant imagery and amazing "future" (past now) that Stanley Kubrick put on screen. Just truly a brilliant work of art.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
bm2759Apr 14, 2013
This truly is the fantastic film everyone says it is... almost. Yes it was ahead of it's time, yes it was groundbreaking in many areas and yes it is memorable. It is the brilliant film people say it is.

It is not perfect however. It isThis truly is the fantastic film everyone says it is... almost. Yes it was ahead of it's time, yes it was groundbreaking in many areas and yes it is memorable. It is the brilliant film people say it is.

It is not perfect however. It is slow, has little dialogue, and is cryptic. But these gripes of mine are offset my great cinematography and a powerful soundtrack.

I'm glad to have finally seen it and recommend this defining film. Just be aware it is not going to be what you expect as it is unique.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
EpicLadySpongeJan 5, 2016
There's much from the movie that you'll enjoy. You know what else could mean sound and minimal dialogue in this movie? It means that some people won't give this movie the score as expected, but at least those science fans can at least showThere's much from the movie that you'll enjoy. You know what else could mean sound and minimal dialogue in this movie? It means that some people won't give this movie the score as expected, but at least those science fans can at least show this movie a little bit higher, right?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
kieranlborgJul 9, 2019
This movie is a simple yet significant representation of the human race from the eye of the great Stanley Kubrick or else its a no bad computer vs human movies. It depends if you want to watch the movies and take it at face value or if youThis movie is a simple yet significant representation of the human race from the eye of the great Stanley Kubrick or else its a no bad computer vs human movies. It depends if you want to watch the movies and take it at face value or if you want to immerse yourself in the story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Kevin41Jan 4, 2017
This movie revolutionized the use of the frame, that here is no longer a simple tool to tell, but it takes on a meaning of its own, being able to express the meaning by itself. Images must "speak": it is for this reason taht the timing ofThis movie revolutionized the use of the frame, that here is no longer a simple tool to tell, but it takes on a meaning of its own, being able to express the meaning by itself. Images must "speak": it is for this reason taht the timing of this film are dilated and shots lasting longer than expected. In this work, in fact, Kubrick creates a communication with the viewer that exceeds the verbal level, reducing the dialogue to a minimum quantity. Music and images become strnger than any words and this is just a skill that the movie has, which is to hit the unconscious without words.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
GrantD243Apr 25, 2018
2001: A Space Odyssey is a film I've been wanting to watch for a while now. I've always heard that it's a great one, and that it is a must-watch for sci-fi fans. Well, I finally watched it yesterday, and I enjoyed it. I think it's a very2001: A Space Odyssey is a film I've been wanting to watch for a while now. I've always heard that it's a great one, and that it is a must-watch for sci-fi fans. Well, I finally watched it yesterday, and I enjoyed it. I think it's a very solid sci-fi film with an interesting story that can be interpreted in more than a few ways (as proven by the hundreds of explanation/theory videos and essays that are out there). The thing that struck me the most about the film is how beautiful it is for a 1968 release. There are some shots that you could show me completely out of context and I'd probably think that it's from a modern movie. The effects are also truly incredible for the era. I am definitely looking forward to attending one of the 70mm screenings that they'll be doing with Nolan's restored version soon. This is also one of those films where I'm going to have to watch it multiple times. It's not really an option. The first time around I was merely trying to take everything I could in, but now I can go back and pay more attention to certain things. With all of that being said, this isn't a perfect film. I think some of the sequences drag on a little too long (although I'm sure audiences were not complaining back when this first came out) and the story does move a little too slow for me at times. But I was still very much satisfied when it ended.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Maarten95Feb 8, 2019
This movie contains the most complex story I have ever seen in a movie before. The movie tries to tell that humanity can only advance through conflict. I doubt anyone however will understand its story by simply watching the movie and thatThis movie contains the most complex story I have ever seen in a movie before. The movie tries to tell that humanity can only advance through conflict. I doubt anyone however will understand its story by simply watching the movie and that might be its biggest flaw. I didn't enjoy the movie until I read on the plot on the internet after the movie was over. If you like complex stories then this is a great movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TheEventsOf1989Dec 29, 2019
A tangent on subject material or origins doesn't mean a movie is a failure. And while 2001: A Space Odyssey is a heavy re-interpretation of the original short story, it doesn't fall short of being a icon of cinema. But that's not the reasonA tangent on subject material or origins doesn't mean a movie is a failure. And while 2001: A Space Odyssey is a heavy re-interpretation of the original short story, it doesn't fall short of being a icon of cinema. But that's not the reason for all its fame, the story and visuals puts a distinct feeling on the audience, allowing for many different takes and perceptions, but I didn't see this as to prestigious or artsy. I think if you have the patience, you can easily enjoy the drama.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
royalguy07Jun 5, 2022
Features about 25 minutes too much of overindulgent setup and display. But I was ultimately won over by the other 2 hours of gorgeous "how the F did they shoot that scene?" cinematography and composition.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
infraReconJun 23, 2023
"What in the actual F is this movie" is the reaction I had after watching this, I had to do a little research into the ending because it just hits you like a Brick. Now before going on about how I wouldn't say I like this movie, that it's a"What in the actual F is this movie" is the reaction I had after watching this, I had to do a little research into the ending because it just hits you like a Brick. Now before going on about how I wouldn't say I like this movie, that it's a masterpiece...

Let me say this, this is a well-filmed, uneasy, exciting movie about the potential evolution of mankind, while this won't necessarily be the path we will choose anytime soon, I think that in the grand scope of things, and I mean grand, this movie explores potential vital things that the human race will have to endure.

I like everything up to the point of the very end, I think it's a bit creepy and maybe a bit forced that Dave became a, well you know.

For a movie made back in 1968 where there was literally little to no CGI, it's impressive. Does it still hold up by today's standards? Ha, No but I understood the intention.

Is this a masterpiece of a space film, well that's purely based on your perspective, and personally I don't think so.

It's not the story it's just that it maybe takes a little bit too long on some scenes, it would've been better if there were more scenarios happening, also some plot lines and scenes are a bit stupid, maybe it's just me but I saw the whole reading the lips of the 2 characters an obvious thing that would happen, but it's still all around great.

I'm gonna give this an 8/10, for some, this may be boring, but for others fairly interesting.
We need a more modern space movie with this type of film prowess, done correctly, only this time make it have the 70s, and 80s flare to it, focusing perhaps on a specific period of human space evolution.

Nothing like the Cloverfield paradox, something Drama based, uneasy, and realistic.

Space may be the final frontier but we first need to conquer reviews.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
clydeDec 28, 2009
This movie was good.. anyone who thinks otherwise does not know a good movie.I think if you watched it at the time it should of gotten a 8 but for the modern generation i will be giving it a 7.
2 of 3 users found this helpful
7
ERG1008Sep 1, 2010
Stanley Kubrick's epic sci-fi tale involving monkeys, space, monoliths & a Russian Leonard Rossiter.
The first two hours of the film are fine, yes it does drag a little here & there, but builds the story up nicely.
The parts with HAL & Dave &Stanley Kubrick's epic sci-fi tale involving monkeys, space, monoliths & a Russian Leonard Rossiter.
The first two hours of the film are fine, yes it does drag a little here & there, but builds the story up nicely.
The parts with HAL & Dave & Frank are, for me, just fantastic.
You get a great sense of claustrophobia with the space suit scenes & the breathing being the only soundtrack. There's also something very sinister about HAL singing Daisy Daisy, with his voice getting lower & lower.
Then the last half hour. I watched it again just to make sure I hadn't missed anything. Looking at some of the other reviews, it seems I'm not alone in missing the point of it. Total nonsense.
Anyway, aside from that, it is still a good film which has stood the test of time 40 years on. Great visuals, brilliant soundtrack & very influential in the way sci-fi films were made afterwards.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
AlienSpaceBatsJul 30, 2011
Its tempting to consider 2001 a companion piece to Arthur C. Clarke's novel only, as its visual narrative can be hard to grasp for many. Is it boring? Yes, but will it blow your mind? Probably.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
Compi24Nov 14, 2013
Despite its sluggish pace, Kubrick's sci-fi epic "2001: A Spacey Odyssey" is still powerful, thought-provoking, chock full of "how-the-hell-did-they-do-that" shots, and a must-watch.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
ragekoiAug 16, 2013
This film expects the viewer to be a philosopher in order to understand the enigmatic allegory Kubrick is trying to convey. Despite the excruciatingly slow pace, parts that feel irrelevant and/or drag on too long, and the extremelyThis film expects the viewer to be a philosopher in order to understand the enigmatic allegory Kubrick is trying to convey. Despite the excruciatingly slow pace, parts that feel irrelevant and/or drag on too long, and the extremely pretentious message, 2001: A Space Odyssey remains an avant-garde experience that deserves a watch/interpretation from everyone.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
CPD98Jul 21, 2014
Que difícil es hacer una crítica de esta película... la odio y me gusta a la vez. Una película muy compleja, buena para la época en la que se hizo, ya que si la hubieran hecho el año pasado puede que le bajara dos o tres puntos. De KubrickQue difícil es hacer una crítica de esta película... la odio y me gusta a la vez. Una película muy compleja, buena para la época en la que se hizo, ya que si la hubieran hecho el año pasado puede que le bajara dos o tres puntos. De Kubrick hay obras mejores pero esta al fin y al cabo es una buena película.… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
SilentTacticianFeb 21, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A fantastic film but it wasn't able to keep me entertained. Lifeless characters and a dull plot. The best thing about this movie was the voice of Hal and its interaction with the pilots. Everything else is what brought this movie down for me.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
MglovesfunFeb 4, 2020
While I can sympathize with people who don't like this film, I was very much drawn into the whole atmosphere and very much enjoyed it. My attention did wander in parts, however.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
xklnbx14Aug 4, 2020
The only reason I'm giving this film a seven is because of the ending which piqued my interest. Otherwise, it would have been a six. The setting is incredibly well made, the symbolism is cool, but the pacing is just so, so slow. The acting,The only reason I'm giving this film a seven is because of the ending which piqued my interest. Otherwise, it would have been a six. The setting is incredibly well made, the symbolism is cool, but the pacing is just so, so slow. The acting, for me, just wasn't quite there, but I enjoyed some of it, so it would have been a six but the ending was quite intriguing, so it's a seven.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
WalkingDead5640Apr 2, 2014
A well crafted piece of art. Incredibly unusual last act! From "Open the pod bay doors, HAL" unleash the thrills and mystery of an influential, mind blowing adventure unlike any other, from prehistoric ape-ancestry into uncharted realms ofA well crafted piece of art. Incredibly unusual last act! From "Open the pod bay doors, HAL" unleash the thrills and mystery of an influential, mind blowing adventure unlike any other, from prehistoric ape-ancestry into uncharted realms of space. Personally, I loved the middle, HAL was terrifying and unpredictable villain. Not everyones type of movie. The film ends leaving more questions than answers.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
NitishJul 23, 2013
First thing first, this is not a movie; this is a piece of art completely focused on realism, logics and detailing of complicated space science of expected future. Additionally some imaginations are also added in the movie to giveFirst thing first, this is not a movie; this is a piece of art completely focused on realism, logics and detailing of complicated space science of expected future. Additionally some imaginations are also added in the movie to give philosophical and dramatic touch.
Overall this is a combination of Failure and success and both are so much mixed up with each other that one can’t classify them.
Still elements of success and failure are as under:-

SUCCESS POINTS
• Most detailed and realistic picturization of outer space and technology.
• Realistic acting.
• No attempt to create any kind of thrill, a completely different approach for a Sci-Fi movie.
• Beautiful use of Music.

FAILURES POINTS

• Lack of connectivity through entire movie between the different phases.
• Lack of conclusiveness. (Either thrill or conclusiveness, one is must).
• Poor ending.… Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
6
TheApplegnomeAug 14, 2015
A spectacular and metaphorically masterpiece. But unfortunately slow and boring.

The first thing you notice while watching 2001: A Space Odyssey are the incredible visuals, that's so incredible. This movie is from the 60s, and I'm stunnedA spectacular and metaphorically masterpiece. But unfortunately slow and boring.

The first thing you notice while watching 2001: A Space Odyssey are the incredible visuals, that's so incredible. This movie is from the 60s, and I'm stunned by how awesome they made the film. We see astronauts in zero-gravity, spinning space ships and a lot more that I didn't think was possible in the 1960s. It's a deep and meaningful movie, that gives the audience a lot to think of, that's worth a lot! That, in combination with a mysterious feeling and much metaphorical scenes that means a lot makes this movie really unique. Those are the most important aspects of the film, but there are also many bad things. The worst thing is the second act, where nothing really happens and I was overall very bored. The space scenes in the second act are great but they're just too slow. It's the same with the characters, they are a bit vague and the conversations are boring. Even though the film is in my taste a bit too boring, is every scene important if you want to understand the bigger picture.

In fact, I do like this movie, but everyone knows that a boring and slow film might not work with every individual. Especially not with me. The opening scene is fantastic, but it's too slow, but interesting. The best parts of the film is actually the beginning and the ending, they are both spectacular and fascinating. They should on the other hand have laid much more focus on the middle of the movie, it's to slow there. Of course, imagine seeing this film in the 60s, a time when most people haven't seen our Earth from above, it must have been something extraordinary! Well; it's a new generation now, and we want more action, but I bet I would have loved this Kubrick-movie it in the 70s! The best aspect of the film I forgot to mention is the soundtrack, so incredible! The sad thing is that it disappeared in the second act.

2001: A Space Odyssey is overall a great film, but the boring scenes are just too much for me. I recommend everyone to see this film twice, because there're many fundamental aspects of the film that you don't perceive the first time. The boring scenes does unfortunately lower my rating considerably.

6.8/10… Expand
5 of 7 users found this helpful52
All this user's reviews
6
SmagsFeb 23, 2014
Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" is often claimed to be the greatest and most influential Sci-Fi classic of all-time. Cases have been made for and against it, mainly whether the film is brilliant or boring. Which is it? Is it aStanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" is often claimed to be the greatest and most influential Sci-Fi classic of all-time. Cases have been made for and against it, mainly whether the film is brilliant or boring. Which is it? Is it a brilliant, sacred jewel of cinema, or is it a dull, lifeless bore? In this case, it's not a matter of OR, but rather, a case of AND. "2001: A Space Odyssey" is both brilliant and boing, however not necessarily at the same time.

Before an examination of both sides, a few points must be made Crystal clear. There are two absolutely essential qualities that must be exhibited to attain enjoyment: A persistent patience, and a clear, conscious open mind. If neither of these two factors are present upon viewing, the film will come off as an instant failure, thus remaining as a frail, distant memory.

As I conclude this introduction, it must be noted that this movie is not any way, shape, or form a "bad" movie. There are spurts and shines of both brilliance and bore; however, it is up to the viewer to decide where and how these victories and faults outweigh the other. Now, onward to the actual review. Let's take a look at the cons first.

CONS:

Pace. Pace. Pace. Paint drying on a wall is faster than the pace that is demonstrated in this film. The momentum is excrutionally painful and abysmally slow, which serves as the prime reason for its downgrades. For those who require a constant, accelerated speed for pace, this would be an ill-suited movie. For those who don't mind a slower progressing, trance inducing plot, this is the quintessential film.

No emotional connection with any of the characters. At no point throughout the course of the film does the viewer feel any sort of liking, disliking, sympathy, suspicion, or annoyance for any character. They are all bland, with no exceptional quality. Kubrick should've known this, and it's an unfortunate shame that a movie as potentially great as this has this undeniable flaw.

PROS:

Excellency of 'Style over Substance': Despite the cons, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a beautifully and wonderfully constructed movie. It is the pinnacle of movies that was able to escape the grasp of the basic fundamental concept of substance over style. Where it lacks in substance, it makes up for - plus more - in style. The effects? To say these effects were way past its time would be an understatement.

The Famous Match-Cut: This, in my purest opinion, is the strongest suit for this movie's credentials. If unclear on what a Match-Cut is, Wikipedia defines it as "a cut in film editing between either two different objects, spaces, or compositions in which an object in the two shots graphically match" (this is often done to link a strong parallel between the two objects). Although the effects are seen by the general public as the film's greatest accolade, this Match-Cut can't be denied as the best in cinema history. The appraisal this sequence could receive should be endless, an even that wouldn't be enough. Starting with the opening of "The Dawn of Man" (literally), the segment spirals through the events of a tribe of apes being ruled by another, discovering the use of bones, and overcoming the tribe through the use of those bones. As the leader of the victorious tribe throws the bone in the air, it rotates in a clockwise rotation. Upon its coming down, the scene shifts from the falling bone to a satellite in outer space, 4 million years later. The scene that transpires is one that truly can not be put into words. The segment, along with the music implemented, unquestionably makes this one of the most appraised and memorable segments in all of cinema. Just that 5 minute work of art will make every viewer indulge deeply in thought to realize how far the human race has truly come.

Cinematography: Time and time again, Stanley Kubrick is able to achieve perfection when it comes to cinematography. Every shot and every angle is executed perfectly without any sort of fault. What else should we expect? There's a reason why he's often labeled as a perfectionist.

These are the pros and cons of the movie as I saw fit. This movie will not be viewed as awe-inspiring by all, but is definitely a journey that everyone must experience. As stated in the beginning of this review, "2001: A Space Odyssey" will be remembered either as a life-changing endeavor, or a time-wasting, disappointing tease of what could have been. 6.25/10… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsDec 1, 2021
This certainly isn't for an average viewer. First of all as for cinematography Kubrick doesn't disappoint just like in all his movie and it really is 10 out of 10. Secondly, the futuristic feel and the fact that so many things where predictThis certainly isn't for an average viewer. First of all as for cinematography Kubrick doesn't disappoint just like in all his movie and it really is 10 out of 10. Secondly, the futuristic feel and the fact that so many things where predict that exists now but in those times didn't really exist, is also insane. So from this aspect I agree, the movie is incredible. As for the plot itself - I do think it could've been better. Yes, now people are guessing what it meant or explaining it etc, but there are many movies which are much less known and also show things ambiguously, but people bash them and say they don't mean nothing. I really enjoy most of other Kubrick's movies, but this is somewhat in the middle - I like the visuals, but I didn't like the ending that much and also I think some shots are too long - like you can watch at 8 times speed and nothing changes really.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LaskeudeungJan 28, 2017
Ya film ini dari awal sampai akhir nonjolin satu aspek doang, artisitik. Kenapa jadi lagendari ? Dikeluarin tahun 1968 tapi teknologi nyatanya baru kita temuin di abad 22. Jenius , tapi ya sekali lagi film artistik yang penonton blockbustersYa film ini dari awal sampai akhir nonjolin satu aspek doang, artisitik. Kenapa jadi lagendari ? Dikeluarin tahun 1968 tapi teknologi nyatanya baru kita temuin di abad 22. Jenius , tapi ya sekali lagi film artistik yang penonton blockbusters 100% bilang "aneh". Legend… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
beeanadouAug 31, 2019
The beginning was great, music was fine but really not get getting what the ending is about.....
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
AtomicjackMay 16, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This film is... interesting. i personally can not argue with the impact this movie had and its heavy symbolism (most of which i do not understand) but this film was over hyped for me as people called it the best film of all time. And do not even get me started on the acid trip sequence near the end of the film, i got a splitting head ache from watching it. overall its fine but way too over hyped and personally confusing.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
akshatmahajanJun 15, 2021
2001: A Space Odyssey is ahead of it's time. Movie came in 1968 and showed so many things which didn't exist before 90s. This movie is said to be best space movie ever made. I disagree. Yes, it might be best space movie of it's time but not2001: A Space Odyssey is ahead of it's time. Movie came in 1968 and showed so many things which didn't exist before 90s. This movie is said to be best space movie ever made. I disagree. Yes, it might be best space movie of it's time but not of all time.

Movie doesn't make perfect sense to me. The story is normal, the characters don't really get through you and the ending made no sense to me. The movie was unnecessarily slow paced and too long (2½ hours). Movie didn't have any proper explaination. I just think this movie is too much overrated. I liked this movie just because it was ahead of its time wheather you talk about visual effects, general idea of the movie and the idea of what space was like. Overall, I liked the movie for the reasons I told earlier but at the same time I would same that it is overrated and boring.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
billrullerApr 14, 2012
Honestly, I couldn't handle this movie at all. I only watched about 15 minutes of it, and after the second time I couldn't handle it. It just seemed very very boring. All I saw were monkeys going abe sh*t because there's a giant black...IHonestly, I couldn't handle this movie at all. I only watched about 15 minutes of it, and after the second time I couldn't handle it. It just seemed very very boring. All I saw were monkeys going abe sh*t because there's a giant black...I don't know. A Bar? A Box? I don't know and I don't care. If this whole movie is gonna be quiet and weird than I don't think this is the movie for me. I'm just amazed that this was critically the best movie by Stanley Kubrick. I've seen some of his weird movies that I don't get and understand how people would actually like it. Like 'A Clockwork Orange' and 'The Shining'. The only movie I found very decent was Full Metal Jacket. I'm just gonna give this movie half credit for the popularity for the viewers and reviewers.… Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
5
lagendofdoomFeb 6, 2020
I have a really mixed feelings about the movie,
on one had the visuals and the shots are simply outstanding very impressive and mind blowing, the carefully planned shots, the way the characters move in the spaceship the composition and miseI have a really mixed feelings about the movie,
on one had the visuals and the shots are simply outstanding very impressive and mind blowing, the carefully planned shots, the way the characters move in the spaceship the composition and mise en scene is just phenomenal.
On the other hand the characters are forgetful, the story in the beginning and the ending is nonexistent, nothing makes sense, you can try and interpret it however you want which is something that is both positive and negative I took it the negative way for the simple reason that I laughed at those scenes of how it doesn't make any sense.
The worst of all is the pacing oh god the pacing... you could shorten the movie by 1 hour and it still would be the same.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
Movie1997Jul 21, 2015
Stanley Kubrick really likes to throw us for a loop. However, it doesn't work like I would have hoped. First off, there is no denying that this movie is straight up beautiful. Absolutely gorgeous to look at. The effects still hold up to thisStanley Kubrick really likes to throw us for a loop. However, it doesn't work like I would have hoped. First off, there is no denying that this movie is straight up beautiful. Absolutely gorgeous to look at. The effects still hold up to this day. The musical score is also beautifully orchestrated and unforgettable. I doubt that anyone will deny that. But the biggest problem with "2001: A Space Odyssey" is that it is excruciatingly slow. It pains me to say it, but this is the first Kubrick movie that got me bored at parts. There are sections in this movie that drag on for so long. And in those moments they really rely on the visual spectacle and beautiful score to cover up the progression of the story (at least I thought). At one point near the end when it was suppose to be super intense, I was trying to keep my eyes open. This movie could have easily been cut 30-40 minutes shorter.And honestly, you don't care about the characters. They seem kind of emotionless. The character you care about is the HAL - 9000. It was such an interesting antagonist and it really is what carries the weight of the movie on its shoulders. This is a hard movie to understand on a first viewing. It's not really a fault of the movie, however with the slow pace, it can distract you from what's going on in the story. Overall, "2001: A Space Odyssey" is a masterpiece on a technical and orchestral level, but sadly nothing more than a painfully slow burn to endure with not so memorable characters. I give this a C!… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
finfroskDec 18, 2014
Technically and visually good, but boring and long.
Yeah, the visual effects are incredible considering the movie is soon to be 50 years old. The main character's acting is good, but you know what? The movie is incredibly long, and almostTechnically and visually good, but boring and long.
Yeah, the visual effects are incredible considering the movie is soon to be 50 years old. The main character's acting is good, but you know what? The movie is incredibly long, and almost nothing happens at all. Some of the scenes go on and on and on and on. And on. It is supposed to be very artistic, but I found it dull and boring. It's just ok. And don't get your panties in a bunch and say I can't appreciate art, because I can, I am an artist myself, so shush. Go watch The Shining, if you have to watch Kubrick.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
JanKrevatinAug 13, 2015
Great philosophy inside the movie itself,. I wouldn`t reccomend it to people that cannot stand a movie without tension happening all the time. There is approximately 25 minutes of two and a half hour film that are really tense. Yet I`m notGreat philosophy inside the movie itself,. I wouldn`t reccomend it to people that cannot stand a movie without tension happening all the time. There is approximately 25 minutes of two and a half hour film that are really tense. Yet I`m not that kind of person but I still found that movie way too long. The movie portrays bunch of interesting topics such as technology, time, space, human evolution, human behaviour which is pretty cool and presented in a good way. But the thing missing were the characters. After the movie was finished I didn`t know almost nothing about persons in the movie.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
ahmedaiman9999Jun 7, 2018
To be honest, I hate 2001, because I think it tells its relies so heavily on its message that there's almost no story to tell. It keeps repeating its messages, that we have already recognized from the get-go, throughout its running time.To be honest, I hate 2001, because I think it tells its relies so heavily on its message that there's almost no story to tell. It keeps repeating its messages, that we have already recognized from the get-go, throughout its running time. Adding insult to injury, it tries to be riveting by showing how wonderful the camera work is,how mesmerizing the cinematography is, how fascinating the production design is, how masterful the editing is, etc. While all these technical points made this movie the most beautiful movie I've ever seen, instead of relying on the technical aspect, I think it should have engaged us with the use of narrative elements, such as a dramatic plot, well-wrought and fleshed-out characters, or in a worst-case scenario, a mysterious event or even character. Also, this movie is the most boring movie I've ever watched.

(5.5/10)… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
clem666Sep 13, 2021
As my score shows it I have very mixed feelings about this movie. Considered a classic, I only discovered it this week (in 2021), which makes it very difficult to bridge the fifty years-gap between its genesis and my very first look. ThatAs my score shows it I have very mixed feelings about this movie. Considered a classic, I only discovered it this week (in 2021), which makes it very difficult to bridge the fifty years-gap between its genesis and my very first look. That being said I still can (even if partially) comprehend why this feature is so important to the hearts of many. Yet it is not my case.

Of course, "2001: A Space Odyssey" benefits from exceptional visuals, sequences and staging. Yes, the colours, the lighting, the perspective and the montage are outstanding. Obviously the soundtrack is really intense and adds a lot to the story (or what seems to be so), even if such a sound environment reveals quite a lot of Kubrick's megalomania when conceptualizing this movie. It is undeniable that the acting (even if represents so few of the work) is great. To conclude with positive aspects I would say that the messages behind this feature are really interesting.

Despite these assets what ruined the experience for me was (amongst others) the movie length. I totally get that the concepts of space and time are really close and that representing such a fact in a movie requires both silences and very dark sequences. But here it is just too much. If you saw the first ten minutes of it you do know what I mean. The story is way too confusing. Events succeed each other without any obvious link or explanation. If Kubrick manages to make us deduce some symbols and causes of events he also surprisingly manages to make his movie just unintelligible and messy. If you witnessed the twenty last minutes of it you do know what I'm talking about. In overall the third and fourth acts are simply mindnumbing in addition to be punctuated by this endless weird psychedelic sequence. Until the end, I looked for something to hold onto, I looked for meaning in all those silent scenes I saw, but nothing came. It gets weirder and weirder until Kubrick finally lets you out of his indelicate, jerky experience.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ThejodjeremieOct 30, 2020
The movie has nice visuals and great acting for a movie that came out in 1968 but it's very slow and boring at times. I can kinda see how this movie is considered great but for me it just didn't work.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
CritiqueGirlMar 1, 2011
It is way to long and drawn out. I suggest you read the book. There is no reason to sit through the process when you can curl up with a good read. It actually is like watching paint dry.
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
4
drlowdonJan 11, 2014
I like to think that I'm pretty open minded when it comes to different film genre's but 2001: A Space Odyssey is one of those critically acclaimed films that has just never connected with me. Yes, I understand that there is hiding depth andI like to think that I'm pretty open minded when it comes to different film genre's but 2001: A Space Odyssey is one of those critically acclaimed films that has just never connected with me. Yes, I understand that there is hiding depth and meaning behind the (especially at the time) beautifully crafted scenes but the slow pace, and running time of over two and a half hours, made it a chore to sit through. I'm all for cinema that does something different but I watch movies to be entertained and in that regard 2001: A Space Odyssey just doesn't work for me.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
4
BradySmithNov 8, 2015
I'm going to get a lot of flack for saying this, but 2001 is probably the most overrated movie of all time. Sure, the effects are serviceable in 2015, the camerawork is stunning, and there are a few moments of transcendent beauty, but thatI'm going to get a lot of flack for saying this, but 2001 is probably the most overrated movie of all time. Sure, the effects are serviceable in 2015, the camerawork is stunning, and there are a few moments of transcendent beauty, but that amounts to like 15 good minutes total if I'm being generous. The rest of the movie is a meticulously constructed boredom. There were times when I wanted to scream with boredom. Kubrick seems to think holding shots on absolutely nothing interesting happening makes him a master, and apparently everyone else thinks this too, but it doesn't. I had moral objections to a clockwork orange and the second half was pretty slow, but overall that was a movie that could entertain, shock and fascinate. I also thought The Shining was one of the creepiest movies ever made. But this? As artful and visionary as it occasionally is, I could barely stand to finish it. I know I'm in the minority, but I have to call out pretension when I see it. Interstellar may have taken much inspiration from this movie, but that one was awe inspiring, heartbreaking and exciting. Gravity was also 1000 times more engaging than this while still containing moments of jaw dropping beauty. I love atmosphere and when a film is drenched in it I encourage slow pacing, but 2001 only has glimpses of atmosphere. 2001 may not be the worst movie ever, but it's one of the most boring.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
vikesh2206Nov 12, 2014
Too abstract to provide anything, Stanley Kubrick's "masterpiece" is an overlong, lifeless adventure with one dimensional characters and a terribly disjointed plot (if there is any).
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
4
RobertOBrienJul 9, 2015
With it's tediously long shots of people floating around space, obnoxious music, distracting intermissions, lack of flowing narrative, little character development, and the conflict of the story only appearing in the last 35 minutes and theWith it's tediously long shots of people floating around space, obnoxious music, distracting intermissions, lack of flowing narrative, little character development, and the conflict of the story only appearing in the last 35 minutes and the ending being a severe case of too much, too late, I simply did not enjoy this film.

But with it's groundbreaking special effects, beautiful cinematography and genuinely disturbing antagonist, I get why the film is remembered.

It tries to be more of an experience than a story, but my personal music and film preferences kept me from enjoying it. The film just constantly felt like a pat on the back followed by a slap in the face. Recommended, but only because I'm sure lots of people will like it, even though I don't.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
CinemassacreMar 13, 2016
When Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi specialist Arthur C. Clarke first conceived the idea of making a Cinerama film, neither had any idea that it would run into a project of several years. Shooting actually began late December, 1965, in EnglandWhen Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi specialist Arthur C. Clarke first conceived the idea of making a Cinerama film, neither had any idea that it would run into a project of several years. Shooting actually began late December, 1965, in England and continued, if one counts added footage and retakes, until early this year. Much of the lengthy shooting time, of course, is attributable to the detailed special effects the story made necessary. Keir Dullea, for instance, completed another film (“The Fox”) and did a Broadway play (“Dr Cook’s Garden”) between completion of his role in “2001” and its current release.

Was all this painstaking research and work worthwhile? There will be many filmgoers, fortunately for Metro, who’ll think it was; there’ll be others who won’t see this in the finished handiwork of Kubrick and his staff. A major achievement in cinematography and special effects, “2001” lacks dramatic appeal to a large degree and only conveys suspense after the halfway mark. Despite the enormous technical staff involved in making the film, it is almost entirely one man’s conception and Kubrick must receive all the praise – and take all the blame.

The plot, so-called, uses up almost two hours in exposition of scientific advances in space travel and communications, before anything happens. The surprisingly dull prolog deals with the “advancement of man,” centering on a group of apes (the makeup is amateurish compared to that in “Planet of the Apes”). An important prop is also introduced but so sketchily that many viewers will scarcely note, and promptly forget it–a huge black monolith is shown briefly (to reappear light years later as the key to possible life on planets other than Earth).

The little humor is provided by introducing well-known commercial names which are presumably still operational during the space age: the Orbiter Hilton hotel, refreshments by Howard Johnson, picture phones by Bell, and Pan Am space ships (although one shown is carrying only a single passenger). A computer named Hal that can talk is, initially, good for a laugh but when it turns out to be the villain, this attitude quickly changes. Hal (voiced by Douglas Rain, although originally done by Martin Balsam) is one of the film’s best effects and surprisingly acceptable, considering reaction to it is based on the use of a voice.

Dullea and Gary Lockwood, as the two principal astronauts, are not introduced until well along in the film. Their complete lack of emotion becomes rather implausible during scenes where they discover, and discuss, the villainy of the computer. Except for William Sylvester, as the scientist who reveals the project to investigate possibility of life on another planet, the other human roles are little more than walkons.

Kubrick and Clarke have kept dialog to a minimum, frequently inserting lengthy passages where everything is told visually. One inside joke is the remark by a femme Russian scientist that her husband is busy elsewhere doing underwater exploration (Clarke’s real-life hobby). Scientific advances appear much further along than would seem possible for the 33 intervening years until 2001. The only earth shots shown are interiors transmitted over picture phones or closed-circuit TV but, incongruously, Earth citizens are shown dressed and acting 1968 while the scientists (even in their casual attire) wear stylized space-age garb.

Film ends on a confused note, never really tackling the “other life” situation and evidently leaving interpretation up to the individual viewer. To many this will smack of indecision or hasty scripting. Dullea, after being subjected to a wild celestial ride through a series of galaxies that create a psychedelic effort on both him and the audience, finds himself in a room decorated in a style familiar to Earth although the implication is that he’s on Jupiter. After confronting himself in various advance stages of age, he finally succumbs to the power generated by the black monolith (still unexplained) which has reappeared. The ending shot blends a planet with an orb-shaped view of an embryo, possibly suggesting the rebirth of civilization in another universe.

Ray Lovejoy’s editing, generally good, too often holds views to the point of losing interest while other scenes are chopped abruptly, sometimes with no explanation. This suggests some wholesale and rather hasty cutting decisions on the part of Kubrick. The 160-minute running time, still over­long, could be shortened sufficiently by some slicing in the lengthy introduction to make the intermission unnecessary.

But “2001” is not a cinematic landmark. It compares with, but does not best, previous efforts at science fiction; lacking the humanity of “Forbidden Planet,” the imagination of “Things to Come” and the simplicity of “Of Stars and Men,” it actually belongs to the technically-slick group previously dominated by George Pal and the Japanese.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
DoctorFilmMar 31, 2016
Stanley Kubrick is alive and well and living in Outer Space. Those filmgoers who have wondered what happened to the man who gave screen birth to "Lolita" and "Dr. Strangelove" can stop worrying. He's taken up a new hobby--science-fiction--andStanley Kubrick is alive and well and living in Outer Space. Those filmgoers who have wondered what happened to the man who gave screen birth to "Lolita" and "Dr. Strangelove" can stop worrying. He's taken up a new hobby--science-fiction--and his first effort comes close to running away with itself. One criticism that will be raised is that film cost too much for so "personal" (i.e. Kubrick) a film.

When Stanley Kubrick and sci-fi specialist Arthur C. Clarke first conceived the idea of making a Cinerama film, neither had any idea that it would run into a project of several years. Shooting actually began late December, 1965, in England and continued, if one counts added footage and retakes, until early this year. Much of the lengthy shooting time, of course, is attributable to the detailed special effects the story made necessary. Keir Dullea, for instance, completed another film (“The Fox”) and did a Broadway play (“Dr Cook’s Garden”) between completion of his role in “2001” and its current release.

Was all this painstaking research and work worthwhile? There will be many filmgoers, fortunately for Metro, who’ll think it was; there’ll be others who won’t see this in the finished handiwork of Kubrick and his staff. A major achievement in cinematography and special effects, “2001” lacks dramatic appeal to a large degree and only conveys suspense after the halfway mark. Despite the enormous technical staff involved in making the film, it is almost entirely one man’s conception and Kubrick must receive all the praise – and take all the blame.

The plot, so-called, uses up almost two hours in exposition of scientific advances in space travel and communications, before anything happens. The surprisingly dull prolog deals with the “advancement of man,” centering on a group of apes (the makeup is amateurish compared to that in “Planet of the Apes”). An important prop is also introduced but so sketchily that many viewers will scarcely note, and promptly forget it–a huge black monolith is shown briefly (to reappear light years later as the key to possible life on planets other than Earth).

The little humor is provided by introducing well-known commercial names which are presumably still operational during the space age: the Orbiter Hilton hotel, refreshments by Howard Johnson, picture phones by Bell, and Pan Am space ships (although one shown is carrying only a single passenger). A computer named Hal that can talk is, initially, good for a laugh but when it turns out to be the villain, this attitude quickly changes. Hal (voiced by Douglas Rain, although originally done by Martin Balsam) is one of the film’s best effects and surprisingly acceptable, considering reaction to it is based on the use of a voice.

Dullea and Gary Lockwood, as the two principal astronauts, are not introduced until well along in the film. Their complete lack of emotion becomes rather implausible during scenes where they discover, and discuss, the villainy of the computer. Except for William Sylvester, as the scientist who reveals the project to investigate possibility of life on another planet, the other human roles are little more than walkons.

Kubrick and Clarke have kept dialog to a minimum, frequently inserting lengthy passages where everything is told visually. One inside joke is the remark by a femme Russian scientist that her husband is busy elsewhere doing underwater exploration (Clarke’s real-life hobby). Scientific advances appear much further along than would seem possible for the 33 intervening years until 2001. The only earth shots shown are interiors transmitted over picture phones or closed-circuit TV but, incongruously, Earth citizens are shown dressed and acting 1968 while the scientists (even in their casual attire) wear stylized space-age garb.

Film ends on a confused note, never really tackling the “other life” situation and evidently leaving interpretation up to the individual viewer. To many this will smack of indecision or hasty scripting. Dullea, after being subjected to a wild celestial ride through a series of galaxies that create a psychedelic effort on both him and the audience, finds himself in a room decorated in a style familiar to Earth although the implication is that he’s on Jupiter. After confronting himself in various advance stages of age, he finally succumbs to the power generated by the black monolith (still unexplained) which has reappeared. The ending shot blends a planet with an orb-shaped view of an embryo, possibly suggesting the rebirth of civilization in another universe.

Ray Lovejoy’s editing, generally good, too often holds views to the point of losing interest while other scenes are chopped abruptly, sometimes with no explanation. This suggests some wholesale and rather hasty cutting decisions on the part of Kubrick. The 160-minute running time, still over­long, could be shortened sufficiently by some slicing in the lengthy introduction to make the intermission unnecessary.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
jonslowDec 15, 2018
I must say I don't get the hype of this movie. I could not even see the whole thing in one sitting because i was having trouble staying awake.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
3
imthenoobJun 2, 2019
Visually stunning but that is about it. There is very little dialogue and you could honestly skip more than half the movie and not miss a beat. 2001 would have been much better as a short film than a feature.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
Page:
More From This Movie

84 Critic Reviews

8.2 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL