1917
Universal Pictures | Release Date: December 25, 2019
8.3
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 954 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
846
Mixed:
69
Negative:
39
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
SebkApr 23, 2020
1917 is a movie with an excellent visual representation and a good but predictable story from one specific point of the film. Besides, the movie some absurds moments that makes you feel out of the atmosphere. However, the movie has strong1917 is a movie with an excellent visual representation and a good but predictable story from one specific point of the film. Besides, the movie some absurds moments that makes you feel out of the atmosphere. However, the movie has strong points in relation to the very good performance of the actors, the use of sequence shot, and the visual representation that involves you in this good and warlike film.

--8/10--… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CoreGamer1408Jun 2, 2020
The reluctant heroes journey is a timeless tale that never fails to inspire if done well. 1917 did a pretty good job of that narratively. I was not impressed by the early to mid part of the films cinematography. It looked kind of a low budgetThe reluctant heroes journey is a timeless tale that never fails to inspire if done well. 1917 did a pretty good job of that narratively. I was not impressed by the early to mid part of the films cinematography. It looked kind of a low budget small screen production value.The gimmick of trying to present the film as one flowing shot from start to finish didn't really work. It was really easy to spot where the movie was cut up and sewn back together. The film picked up for me after half way. With some really nice cinematography in mid to late action sections. I ended up really rooting for this down to earth guy trying to do his best in the most desperate of times.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JagzzFeb 10, 2020
There are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the warThere are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the war itself, some things never seem to change.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Iamcritical86Aug 29, 2021
This picture was exceptionally well done all the way around. Excellent cinematography and overall a visual masterpiece! It's been a VERY long time since I've seen a film of this quality. 1917 will be a tough one to beat! I do believe we haveThis picture was exceptionally well done all the way around. Excellent cinematography and overall a visual masterpiece! It's been a VERY long time since I've seen a film of this quality. 1917 will be a tough one to beat! I do believe we have a classic on our hands here!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
kirkenderMay 10, 2020
World War One movies are so hot right now. This one is fine. The whole "continuous shot" gimmick mostly works and is technically impressive, however what is super grounded realism for the first half, becomes wildly outrageous for the secondWorld War One movies are so hot right now. This one is fine. The whole "continuous shot" gimmick mostly works and is technically impressive, however what is super grounded realism for the first half, becomes wildly outrageous for the second half and feels like a damned John Wick movie. Also for a film "depicting the horrors" of World War One, this is super sterile; which I understand, because it's not a gore filled horror movie, but the film loses it's footing in trying to be realistic and not wanting to be realistic enough to scare people. The first third and the last scene are amazing and totally worth the watch, toss the rest.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SoulWarfareFeb 27, 2020
People call this film "The Birdman of WWI" and to be fair that is a justified assessment. This entire film is filmed like it is one camera shot and it is AWESOME! think one of the most impressive thing apart from the one looking shot is thePeople call this film "The Birdman of WWI" and to be fair that is a justified assessment. This entire film is filmed like it is one camera shot and it is AWESOME! think one of the most impressive thing apart from the one looking shot is the AMAZING CINEMATOGRAPHY. This shouldn’t be no surprising since it is the legend himself Roger Deakins (Blade Runner 2049 Cinematographer). Every scene feels like a painting and it is absolutely stunning. There is a scene at night where the lighting was done in such a creative way that heighten the tension of the scene. On that note there must also be praise for the score by Thomas Newman who somehow manages to make a score that somehow manages toe elevate every scene and help tell the story. There is also some amazing sound design that manages to make the War actually scary with moments that give horror movie jump scares a run for its money. Additionally, the props and set design should also get praise for creating such large,realistic but elaborate sets to accommodate for a more natural one shot scene. Everything in this film just feels like a technical achievement. We haven’t even touched on the acting or story yet but just for the way this was filmed is already engaging enough. Nevertheless, the two main actors George MacKay as Lance Corporal William "Will" Schofield and Dean-Charles Chapma as Lance Corporal Thomas "Tom" Blake manages to do a phenomenal job in showing the horror of war and giving authentic,believable characters. The story, while relatively simple, is engaging enough to keep you invested in the objective of the main characters. They must send a message to allies stop them running into a trap. It’s simple but works well for the aim of one shot as now it makes the audience a part of the journey.

There isn’t much negative to this movie but I guess if I have to be quite nitpicky it is the fact that halfway through the movie there is a obvious cut. So this movie is actually really a two shot film. The cut was necessary to make the situation more desperate and allow for a unique change in scenery even though it was a bit of a jarring cut. Another sort of nitpick is that we don’t really get much info on the main characters. We get their names and we know what their mission is but their backstory is just given in tidbits. It goes in a Dunkirk route in which we care about these characters because of the situation they are in rather than the fact that we are invested in the characters. It can be argued that the tidbits more than gives you enough info about the characters but it’s really up to the audience in the end. Personally, I don’t find it too much of a fault but can see how others could consider it so.

Honestly my negatives are just nitpicks. This movie is amazing and it is definitely worth watching right now.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Snowden111Feb 19, 2020
Masterpiece. You have to watch this movie. The way it was shot was mind blowing. You have to watch this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
LivingTribunalSep 10, 2020
There isn’t any unnecessary shot in this…, no I’ll have to say this is a perfect masterpiece without having any unnecessary 1/1000 shot.

spoiler below: ----------------------------------------- First of all, Roger Deakins has accomplishedThere isn’t any unnecessary shot in this…, no I’ll have to say this is a perfect masterpiece without having any unnecessary 1/1000 shot.

spoiler below:
-----------------------------------------

First of all, Roger Deakins has accomplished absolutely transcendent work using the one-take technique. But I often see that not many people recognize the movie’s well-organized plot. Schofield is a soldier who doesn’t have any certain direction of life just like many other soldiers. He's just tired of long-lasting war. I think his journey can also be considered as a journey of asking. He has to ask people to get to Colonel MacKenzie because the map is useless for him. The plot is very well designed in a symmetrical way. In the end, he runs along the trench line, not toward the enemy, and finally finds out that his way should be home.

p.s.
-"I'm only going over Jordan, I'm only going over home"
- When Blake died two soldiers appear to Schofield. One was short and little fat, and the other was tall and skinny just like Blake and Schofield. This scene shows that this film is really about ordinary soldiers.
-Unlike World War II, World War 1 didn't have any specific bad guy like Hitler, it was just a difference of ideology. This is why 1917 is different from all other war movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PalpetineSheevMar 20, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The shot of Schofield running at the end of the film will become one of cinemas most iconic shots. Mark my words.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
markjamie20Feb 8, 2020
Technically brilliant with the cinematography and editing, but as an actual immersive movie experience it's lacking emotionally and is substantially hollow.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Marlock101Jul 31, 2020
This movie is a near-perfect representation of the gritty and dark reality of World War 1. This perfectly encapsulated the scale and gravity of the war. The protagonist is likable, and the characters are portrayed well (in terms of WW1This movie is a near-perfect representation of the gritty and dark reality of World War 1. This perfectly encapsulated the scale and gravity of the war. The protagonist is likable, and the characters are portrayed well (in terms of WW1 soldiers). Overall very emotional, well made, very impressive on a cinematographical level, and amazingly believable and immersive.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ViccoMay 31, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Amazing movie.
Touching story.
My favorite part is when he meets the french lady and gives her milk for the baby.
I also think they should have done the waterfall part different more realistic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AJGo85Feb 9, 2020
There are not many films about World War I. The most well-known ones are anti-war dramas: All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), Grand Illusion (1938), Paths of Glory (1957), Gallipoli (1981). On the surface 1917 is a well-done, thrillingThere are not many films about World War I. The most well-known ones are anti-war dramas: All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), Grand Illusion (1938), Paths of Glory (1957), Gallipoli (1981). On the surface 1917 is a well-done, thrilling action-war movie. It is also such an immersive and intense experience that without making any overt political statement it is firmly an antiwar film. It may be a good, thrilling movie but it is never exciting in the way an adventure movie is exciting. Even in the quiet moments 1917 makes you want to be as far away from this war as possible and hope another one like it never happens.

The plot is simple and very straightforward. Two young British soldiers are selected to deliver a message to a distant regiment calling off an attack the next morning. If the attack goes forward 1,600 soldiers, including the brother of one of the messengers, will charge into a trap. The encounters Corporals Blake and Schofield (Dean-Charles Chapman and Georgy MacKay) have as they make their journey across enemy territory are what you might expect from a story about soldiers on a mission: attacks from the enemy, crossing paths with another group of soldiers, finding shelter that is actually dangerous, even stumbling across a villager trying to care for a child. 1917 isn’t a total onslaught to the senses for two hours though. There are respites here and there that allow us to get to know Blake and Schofield. There are some surprising cameos by well-known British actors along the way too (or unsurprising if you’ve seen the trailer or the cast list on IMDb). Fortunately, none of these cameos take you out of the movie (Andrew Scott and Mark Strong could slip comfortably into just about any movie).

Director Sam Mendes employs long takes and expert, precise cinematography by Roger Deakins and stealthy editing by Lee Smith to make the film look and feel as though it exists in one long unbroken shot. This gimmick works well for the movie when it is not distracting. In its successful moments the one-shot effect is largely responsible for the film’s frantic, immersive effect. The climatic sequence of Schofield running like mad across the top of a trench as a battle begins to find the colonel to call off the attack makes excellent use of the one shot effect; it had me gripping the armrests of my seat. Also, the nighttime sequence in a bombed-out village where flairs illuminate the night with a bright, eerie white light and a fire rages in the distance is surreal and terrifying. Other scenes, however, like when a group of soldiers (and the camera) climb into the back of a truck, then get out to push the truck, then climb back in again feel like they are straining to keep the shot unbroken. Though I think there’s nothing in 1917 that couldn’t have been achieved with conventional editing, I understand why Mendes chose to present his film as a single unbroken shot. It puts us right there with the two soldiers and we are as unsure as they are of what will happen next. There are two consequences of using the one-shot/single-take gimmick in a war film. 1) Whether intentional or not, the one-shot effect, which keeps the camera right behind, or in front of, or over the shoulder of the characters, along with the nature of the story makes the film feel like a video game at certain times. This is not really a fault against the film. It is more likely due to video games being influenced by movies and then filtering back into the culture, but the comparison comes to mind nonetheless. 2) I think all of the focus and talk surrounding the one-shot effect actually diverts attention away from the harrowing experience of the characters in the film. 1917 has already won several awards and praise as a technical achievement (which it certainly is). I just hope people can get past the film’s style to fully appreciate and experience the events on screen.

1917 only tangentially touches on the larger scale of the war. One character makes a background comment on the unimpressive patch of land they’ve been fighting the Germans over for years. Mendes chose not to focus on the politics of the war but instead tell the story of the enlisted men that fought in the trenches and in open fields. This movie is based in part on the experiences of Lance Corporal Alfred Mendes, Sam Mendes’s grandfather, to whom the film is dedicated. Mends co-wrote the screenplay, his only writing credit. For all the unrelenting action in 1917, the final shot makes this an emotional and affecting movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
zNeverSleepingFeb 8, 2020
Esse é um dos filmes que te deixam com uma interrogação na cabeça, mas não relacionada a trama, e sim a técnica.

Impressionante. O trabalho e dedicação do Sam Mendes aqui é notável. Todo o filme estava friamente conectado. A direção faz comEsse é um dos filmes que te deixam com uma interrogação na cabeça, mas não relacionada a trama, e sim a técnica.

Impressionante. O trabalho e dedicação do Sam Mendes aqui é notável. Todo o filme estava friamente conectado. A direção faz com que a cinematografia tenha um controle total de como tudo ocorre, como se fossemos um hospedeiro e/ou todo cenário fosse uma esteira, e falando nisso, que cenografia absurda - que contribui e muito para a atmosfera. E aqui vem uma curiosidade: como foi possível planos tão longos? É como se o cenário não acabasse mais.

O roteiro tem seus méritos. Sabe bem como familiarizar o publico com historias ou alívios cômicos - bem no inicio do filme; também consegue nos fazer ficar vidrado num gênero que já se tornou maçante há um tempo - quando não aproveitado da maneira correta; e traz justamente a possibilidade de fazer um filme com pouquíssimos cortes, se assemelhando a um plano sequencia por completo. E por ultimo, devo apenas mencionar o plano sequencia que ocorre próximo ao final do filme, que é simplesmente maestral e emocionante. Ver isso num Imax faz toda a diferença!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ILikeToBreatheNov 7, 2020
Loved it. A touching story and relatively accurate historically, though I think they could have done more with the 'one continuous shot' idea.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
clem666Mar 18, 2023
Outstanding artwork. A poetic and intense story about friendship, family, death, boldness and abnegation in the context of war. The movie really shines in my opinion for its ability to give precise proportion of time to storytelling, silence,Outstanding artwork. A poetic and intense story about friendship, family, death, boldness and abnegation in the context of war. The movie really shines in my opinion for its ability to give precise proportion of time to storytelling, silence, roaring fear, moments of comradeship and plain jokes.
Terrific acting performances for both George MacKay (playing as Scholfield) and Dean-Charles Chapman (as Blake). Their interactions embellish their respective roles and manage to craft a touching bond.
Amazing work from Sam Mendes and his team for the shooting, the colours, the sound-design, the editing and the overall atmosphere. Thank you too, Thomas Newman, for this notable soundtrack. '1917' is not a film with many plots and sub-plots, in fact it doesn't tell much of anything, but it does take us into a very dark moment in the history of mankind in our modern and contemporary times. It's more a movie to live than to watch. The film clearly lacks a 'must-see' label.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
akyla2077Feb 15, 2020
Игра года и тысячелетия и десятилетия и столетия и тысячелетия
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SimonsRantsSep 16, 2020
Compelling visuals and masterful technical filmmaking from cinematography to editing to sound mixing - all fantastic (although, some of the "invisible cuts" were blatantly obvious)
The fact that it's based on Sam Mendes' grandfathers memoirsCompelling visuals and masterful technical filmmaking from cinematography to editing to sound mixing - all fantastic (although, some of the "invisible cuts" were blatantly obvious)
The fact that it's based on Sam Mendes' grandfathers memoirs also makes it all the more compelling. But it has many drawbacks not the least of which is that the single cut style never stops feeling like a gimmick in this film - unlike in Birdman where you're absorbed into the story - so the film itself never stops quite feeling like a gimmick either.
It also suffers from a lack of having much to say as the plot is a rather basic A B C plot with no surprises or messages to make you think in the least. Just a standard story with nothing new or original to say. Now, it tells that story well but it's not particularly compelling in any way if you've seen other more masterful war movies. To call 1917 a war film may not be entirely fair or accurate either as it feels much more akin to a thriller. But even then, it's not quite thrilling enough to be a thriller so perhaps just a war drama?
It's a masterfully made film with very few technical flaws but with many, many storytelling flaws. Far from a bad film, but still almost just as far from being great - definitely good though, just unfortunately not much more than good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
glommanOct 20, 2022
Don't get me wrong the whole one-shot camera thing is an incredibly brilliant idea and delivers a really immersive experience, but this movie honestly doesn't have much else going on besides that. It follows the same images of WWI you'veDon't get me wrong the whole one-shot camera thing is an incredibly brilliant idea and delivers a really immersive experience, but this movie honestly doesn't have much else going on besides that. It follows the same images of WWI you've probably seen dozens of times, the characters, although walking through trauma, are mostly flat. The Germans are just plain evil henchmen getting mowed down or just plain insidious whenever the chance arises (as per usual).
I really don't see how this movie is supposed to be special, once you take the incredible camera work away, it becomes a desolate wasteland of caricatures.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ChrisPaniaguaApr 20, 2021
Although it might seem like just another war plot, the "uncut" sequential shot is the originality of this film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
aukalenderFeb 13, 2022
A looker. The movie is basically a one-shot (yes I know they disguise the cuts). It is very immersive. Saw this with my mother, who, like me, does not really have a massive thing for the war movie genre. But we were both gripped. The mostlyA looker. The movie is basically a one-shot (yes I know they disguise the cuts). It is very immersive. Saw this with my mother, who, like me, does not really have a massive thing for the war movie genre. But we were both gripped. The mostly unknown lead actors delivered greatly. Same for Andrew Scott, Benedict Cumberbatch, Colin Firth and Richard Madden who jolted the movie with energy in the few scenes they were in. The story is pretty thin, but this is a movie and not a novel. It does not need a convoluted story and incredible dialogue to be compelling. Good acting, great shots, some dramatic music here and there and boom Bob's your uncle.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Diesel6401Mar 26, 2020
Excellent! Beautifully shot.
Great story. Fantastic score, although I would have had Ed Sheeran camo for Wayfaring Stranger - his version years ago was fantastic. For a fan of war films - must see!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
tarekaliJun 16, 2022
This movie is a love letter to old-school storytelling and cinematography in particular. From the opening shot to the final cut, there was only one single absolutely justified disruption in the viewpoint of the audience. End to end, thisThis movie is a love letter to old-school storytelling and cinematography in particular. From the opening shot to the final cut, there was only one single absolutely justified disruption in the viewpoint of the audience. End to end, this brutal mission was a singular journey through blasted hell scapes, lush meadows, dark caverns, and erupting fields of fire. It is truly a master class in filmmaking to seamlessly tell a story in a single cut. The mission itself is the point, where the will to live and save lives, to sacrifice for the greater good, can infect even the most nonchalant of protagonists. In turn, such sacrifice can lead to inner peace and resolution of old hurts. There are moments of utter terror where our heroes are running for their lives and complete peace where they take a moment to enjoy the miracle of life itself. But all in all, this is one unforgettable war story, told in a single sweeping vision.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
keanureveesMar 16, 2020
As someone who isn't big on war movies, I wasn't sure how I'd feel about this, and now, after I've seen it I'm still not too sure. There's a lot to like. Visually it's stunning, with the directing and cinematography (the Écoust scenes were myAs someone who isn't big on war movies, I wasn't sure how I'd feel about this, and now, after I've seen it I'm still not too sure. There's a lot to like. Visually it's stunning, with the directing and cinematography (the Écoust scenes were my favourite part of the film); I also really liked the brotherhood between the soldiers that drove the story. The story as a whole, however, felt a bit flat to me and I feel like the ending was missing...something. Again, mixed emotions, but, without a doubt, worth the trip to the cinema.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DiegoDFFeb 16, 2020
Filme incrível, com roteiro e cenas grandiosos, impecáveis. Para os brasileiros assistam legendando deu uma emoção maior em varias cenas!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ArthuuFeb 21, 2020
Impressively well directed, very atmospheric with stunning sound design and convincing play - a must watch
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
hnestlyontheslyMar 2, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 1917 was designed to make you feel really, really sad and hate rats more than you already did, but the fact that it has received so much critical love I think requires us to think more deeply about whether or not it understands contemporary cultural anxieties relative to the other films we have had on offer this year. We're doing a full review with spoilers. Sam Mendes's take on the war film genre isn't especially novel, but some of his approach shows that an update was a long time coming. 1917 fits nicely into the zeitgeist of nihilistic skepticism. It is a war film that for the most part does away with any heroic shoot-em-up scenes. After our first protagonist, played by the fabulous best-friend Dean-Charles Chapman from Blinded by the Light, dies in a particularly grisly way, stabbed in the belly by a German pilot as he tends to the pilot's burns--this death reduced Wife to tears for the next two hours--she said to me, "I don't want to watch anymore," and when I asked her if she wanted to leave, she said, "No"--talk about complicated feelings about a movie--the focus shifts to our new main guy played by George MacKay. MacKay spends most of the rest of the film running ignobly as fast as his feet will carry him through the rubble of bombed out cities, scurrying past patrols with stormtrooper-like aim, even pushing his way past his his own men after his arrives late-but-not-too-late to the first wave of soldiers being sent off to certain doom. Lance Corporal Schofield (MacKay) is set up originally as the grisled vet who's seen worse days at the beginning of the film. LC Blake moons over Schofield's participation in a storied past battle and cannot seem to understand how and why Schofield might have lost his medal from those days. Schofield seems like he is destined to die in order to create stakes for the growth of our young idealist who needs to grow up in the 48 hours it'll take for him to reach the new front and save his brother, but instead, the film inverts our expectations by gutting the innocent younger brother character before the mission has really even begun. Even Schofield's finest hour, his shoot-out with the sniper after receiving way, way too much advice from a very chatty Mark Strong, is bookended by a bit of a slapstick moment from the trailer where he's knocked back down the stairs as he comes upon the injured German. The glamor of his kill is undercut by the way that his fall disrupts the continuity of the take and possibly dooms the mission, as an inexplicable amount of time has passed while he's been out. The objective presentation of corpses in 1917 is an accomplishment. They are not used as spectacle or in order to evoke moral outrage, rather, they serve to strengthen a sense of disconnect between soldiers and their humanity. Blake stares as curiously at the carcass of a dead horse just before No Man's Land as Schofield does when he's making his way through muck and accidentally shoves his arm chest deep into a human corpse. Schofield's sudden dip into the river would have been a pretty standard juxtaposition of the madness of battle with the peace of nature, cherry blossoms coating the surface of a calm stream leading into a lake. It would have recalled Blake's powerful pronouncement about the cherry trees cut down at the farm in his final scene: when the fruit rots and the seeds sprout, there'll be more trees than ever here. But that added twist of the knife, having Schofield tearfully clamber over floating corpses to get his footing is really what ties the two experiences together: not only is the river a means of connecting us with Schofield's memory of his friend or a haven from the chaos, but it is also littered with dozens of indiscernible bodies of young men from both sides, blocking the "sieve" from his bedtime story to the child in town. Only now, the sieve is not a ship unready for sea, a symbol for the hopelessness and cruelty of powers beyond these young men's control, but the men themselves are the sieve. Generally, I'm pleased with the direction, the cinematography, the action, and the pacing, but I don't see what is so innovative about this form of storytelling or even its cultural significance relative to some of the other films made this year. It's a film made up of an almost entirely white cast, bankable English stars whose cameos are either awkwardly long or puzzlingly short, and its only female character's actions are basically 1) act frightened, 2) care for stranger's baby, 3) thank soldier for milk, 4) unsuccessfully ask him to stay in her hovel. I want to resist making comparisons to Dunkirk, because I don't want to inadvertantly compliment Dunkirk by placing it next to another film on the same level of slightly disappointing, but what I will say is that the structural complexity of Dunkirk enabled it to tell a much less conventional story. 1917 is a little bit trapped by its own cinematic limitations. Much more review on the site.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
tayvoodooFeb 15, 2020
this movie was something else. the plot, the cinematography, the ambience, the score, the cast, ugh everything is perfect. also george mackay and richard madden own this b*ssy. go see 1917 on theaters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DouglasspompeuJun 10, 2020
1917 goes beyond its great achievement in cinema technique. It is poetic and will delivery a beautiful and deep message for those who care about life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
BRJacobsFeb 10, 2020
What a great film, this is an intense, heartbreaking, thrill ride of a movie from beginning to end. This is how you put the audience on the edge of their seats. Does a fantastic job of making us feel the times as they are. The characters areWhat a great film, this is an intense, heartbreaking, thrill ride of a movie from beginning to end. This is how you put the audience on the edge of their seats. Does a fantastic job of making us feel the times as they are. The characters are fun, active, and relatable. Color pallet and cinematography are all great to establish tone and message. Some scenes are profoundly unnerving in a good way. Worth everyone's time to see a glimpse of history.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Timmy121Feb 10, 2020
Если не лучший, то один из лучших фильмов которые я смотрел когда-либо, все говорят “Конечно не Хокиан Феникс, но актёрская игра не плохая”, люди, это совсем другой фильм, по вашему актёры должны играть в этом фильме Джокера, актёры играютЕсли не лучший, то один из лучших фильмов которые я смотрел когда-либо, все говорят “Конечно не Хокиан Феникс, но актёрская игра не плохая”, люди, это совсем другой фильм, по вашему актёры должны играть в этом фильме Джокера, актёры играют охуенно, даже когда один из них умирает, а другой не плачет, но на его лице больше чем слёзы, ты чувствуеш их игру… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
eutohiusFeb 12, 2020
This movie is definitely a must-see. Dickins' work is as stunning as always. A pure pleasure to an eye.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
KatanaVoidFeb 13, 2020
1917 has one of the best photographies and editing that Hollywood has ever seen, but Sam Mendes doesn't make a good plot or an interesting debate about WW1 and its surroundings, instead, he makes a beautiful and technically impeccable movie,1917 has one of the best photographies and editing that Hollywood has ever seen, but Sam Mendes doesn't make a good plot or an interesting debate about WW1 and its surroundings, instead, he makes a beautiful and technically impeccable movie, but with an almost unimportant story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NiallHayesFeb 15, 2020
This is the best war movie Ive seen for a long time. It takes over an hour for a bullet to even be fired but i was on the edge of my seat the while time. The one shot style of the movie keeps you grounded and there with them for the entireThis is the best war movie Ive seen for a long time. It takes over an hour for a bullet to even be fired but i was on the edge of my seat the while time. The one shot style of the movie keeps you grounded and there with them for the entire journey. Its very impressive to experience. Shame it missed out on the best picture award. Wouldve been a well deserved win… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThePeruvianPostFeb 18, 2020
"Director Sam Mendes employs distinctive but extraordinary shots in the first person during the two-hour footage, which makes the production work in many different ways. Although it sometimes results too shaky, it is thanks to George MacKay"Director Sam Mendes employs distinctive but extraordinary shots in the first person during the two-hour footage, which makes the production work in many different ways. Although it sometimes results too shaky, it is thanks to George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman's performances that 1917 preserves both sombre but optimistic tones throughout the montage. In short, this is an exceptional approach to memorialise the hundredth anniversary of the end of the First World War".
...
We are somewhere in France during the Trench Warfare [1915 - 1917] with a depleted British Army; the atmosphere, alongside with the dialogues, can define by itself how was life at the front: scarce water and food, despair between soldiers to go home, endless weapons and corpses scattered on the floor, and so forth. Corporals Blake and Schofield are told to attain a severe/impossible mission despite not having any reinforcements. Before achieving this goal in sending General MacKenzie [Bennedict Cumberbatch] the infamous fallback letter, both privates must penetrate the frightful No Man's Land and experience horrendous life-and-death encounters in many places.
...
Regardless of the silent second half, the absence of preeminent performers and the woozy experience of watching the film in one sole perspective director Sam Mendes and executive producers deliver an eloquent portrayal about surprising facts of the four-year global conflict. For example, both soldiers are bewildered by the superiority of the German trenches in proportions and in quality considering that historically they were far better equipped than the Allied ones which allow the audience the opportunity of a lifetime to analyse the condition millions of innocent citizens were facing. The result improves with some accurate shots at landscapes, underground warfare channels, entire villages pulverised, etcetera. I must acknowledge the last fifteen minutes of the film; it has been a long time since I spotted such an imposing ending. Countless emotions appear regardless of having reached the climax. What a masterpiece ladies and gentlemen!
...
What amazes me the most is that despite being a World War film, 1917 does not give the impression in duplicating the ordinary details of previous same-genre releases such as Hacksaw Ridge [2017]. Once Mr Gibson introduced a brief biography of Desmond Doss [the main character] he began recording some ultraviolent scenes as though you were spotting the most savage state of humankind. As an alternative, 1917 delivers some innovative procedures in creating a war film without increasing the brutal strength of instant classics as Saving Private Ryan.
...
Congratulations!
...
[80/100]… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
andyfilm24Feb 16, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Finally got to see 1917. A film I was hoping to see in IMAX. Thank goodness I didn't. It was a real disappointment. Great visual effects and art direction, but I lean more to watching a good story, with characters I care about. 1917, didn't have the latter. I think more time was spent on the blocking and building eye-popping sets than on the script. The character of Lance Corporal Blake was killed off WAY too soon. I would have like to have seen more time with him interacting with his friend, Lance Corporal Schofield. I think this made the film mostly cold and unfeeling. I didn't really make me feel anything when Blake was killed or the meeting of Blake's older brother. Want to see a good, emotional war flick? See Saving Private Ryan, or try to find Gallipoli.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Dcuniverse101Feb 19, 2020
The cinematography is beautiful and the single shot visual is an amazing feat, however with this comes a long winded plot with a lot of empty unnecessary scenes which deeply affects the overall pacing of the film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
skyhelper0505Feb 19, 2020
지위가 있는 간부도 아닌 일개 두명의 병사가 영화 전체를 긴장감 안에서 풀어나가는 전개가 상당히 흥미진진했다. 특히 독특한 촬영기법으로 마치 잘 만들어진 비디오 게임속에서 전쟁을 직접 체험하는 듯한 느낌을 선사해주고 영화가 끝나고나서 안도의 숨을 내쉬었던 작품.지위가 있는 간부도 아닌 일개 두명의 병사가 영화 전체를 긴장감 안에서 풀어나가는 전개가 상당히 흥미진진했다. 특히 독특한 촬영기법으로 마치 잘 만들어진 비디오 게임속에서 전쟁을 직접 체험하는 듯한 느낌을 선사해주고 영화가 끝나고나서 안도의 숨을 내쉬었던 작품.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
prashant99084Feb 23, 2020
I liked the movie very much it has lot of emotions and screenplay is engaging direction is upto the mark
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
RobwinzApr 19, 2020
An amazing war movie, which shows the struggles and dangers on what it was like in WW1. Also, this movie does something amazing and that's by making the clips they've got from this movie and making it look like it's been shot in one clip,An amazing war movie, which shows the struggles and dangers on what it was like in WW1. Also, this movie does something amazing and that's by making the clips they've got from this movie and making it look like it's been shot in one clip, it's pretty outstanding.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
kmtd1971Mar 28, 2020
well done set and costume. Great cinematography. I found the 2 main characters seems to have no clues how dangerous war is. Overall the script is good and I totally stay engaged thru the entire film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
loremApr 1, 2020
A great movie, impeccably shot, managing to captivate you and make you feel that you are part of the action of the movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
bradens584Dec 19, 2020
1917 is more than a movie. It’s an experience. It demands to be seen in a cinema on the big screen, because this is a work of art. It perfectly encapsulates the feeling of the front lines of WW1 in a riveting fashion. Filmed all in one take,1917 is more than a movie. It’s an experience. It demands to be seen in a cinema on the big screen, because this is a work of art. It perfectly encapsulates the feeling of the front lines of WW1 in a riveting fashion. Filmed all in one take, it follows Lance Corporals Schofield and Blake as they embark on a dangerous mission to deliver a message across enemy lines. Sam Mendes’s (Spiderman, Skyfall) direction coupled with beautiful cinematography by Roger Deakin (Fargo, No Country for Old Men) make this film a true spectacle. Emotional, moving, technically brilliant, 1917 is one of the best movies ever made, and the equal best movie I’ve reviewed on this account.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Legit_LeeJan 18, 2021
Every time a heard a gun shot i shat my pants, it tasted like my custom made cum pancakes ;)
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
FreddoFazbeardoMay 11, 2020
I thought it was a very good movie, the suspense and everything else, it was very well controlled and it's also fun.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MatthewNicollApr 16, 2020
I never get sucked in by movies, I usually just end up bored at most parts, wondering why I even started watching it in the first place, but this movie broke that streak! I was constantly sucked into the action and felt like I was on theI never get sucked in by movies, I usually just end up bored at most parts, wondering why I even started watching it in the first place, but this movie broke that streak! I was constantly sucked into the action and felt like I was on the journey with these 2 boys! Truly incredible!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThejodjeremieOct 28, 2020
The movie is non stop tension all the way through and it's great. The cinematography is incredible when it looks like the camera never cuts. The movie does slow down a little at times but it's still great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JordanLaytonApr 28, 2020
This movie is nearly pure spectacle. Jaw-dropping scenes of the journey of these two soldiers across a war torn France only break for small spurts of effective pathos injections a handful of times. Otherwise, this movie is a beautiful andThis movie is nearly pure spectacle. Jaw-dropping scenes of the journey of these two soldiers across a war torn France only break for small spurts of effective pathos injections a handful of times. Otherwise, this movie is a beautiful and technically impressive ride through WWI. Being made to look like it was done in one shot puts you directly into the shoes of the soldiers but I'm not sure that makes up for the cost of losing the emotion that regular editing usually conveys. 1917 pushes the boundaries of what is possible in film making, but I just didn't connect to it quite as much as I wanted to.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
vince13612Jun 25, 2020
This movie is best watched in theaters for the ultimate and best experience i think. overall the movie is great but the main thing that stands out is the outstanding and amazing cinematography it is incredibly fluid and looks like it wasThis movie is best watched in theaters for the ultimate and best experience i think. overall the movie is great but the main thing that stands out is the outstanding and amazing cinematography it is incredibly fluid and looks like it was taken in one shot with some amazing scenes, also the audio is amazing too especially in theaters.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MistergrandeJul 10, 2020
Never forgotten film...! Good story and good action i ever seen.bless god....
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DirodiJul 22, 2020
Una historia simple, que sabe que su punto fuerte es el apartado técnico. No decepciona.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
knightgamer325Dec 7, 2020
esta película me encanto, es una obra de arte audiovisual que retrata el trabajo de los soldados mensajeros en la primera guerra mundial les recomiendo que la vean para los apacionas sobre la gran guerra
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TowballNov 3, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Now, before I begin this review, I just want to say some things I didn’t like about this film. I found that the dialogue was a little stiff at some point, and didn’t really feel genuine. As a result, I found myself not being able to form much of a connect with the characters of the film. But ultimately, I have not been able to stop thinking about this film since I had watched it. This movie is a masterpiece, in pretty much every form. The whole movie is made to look like it is one long take, and some of the transitions of the film are truly seamless. They did a really good job of not making the camera feel restricted, and instead chose to push the cinematography of each scene, which really impressed me. My main concern coming into this movie was that the narrative structure would fall short, mainly because of the fact that they would not be able to cut between scene. However, I was pleased to say that I was proven wrong. The writing for this film is fantastic. Each scene never feels slow or dragged out, but instead holds a consistent level of tension, making the audience feel like the characters are constantly in danger, because ultimately, they are.
I would also like to make note that the set design for this film are some of the best I have ever seen. Each scene is composed of visually breathtaking set locations, which are dripping with atmosphere. My favourite scene of the whole movie is the scene where the protagonist is running through a destroyed town at night, where the only source of light is flares being shot up into the sky, casing shifting shadows across the whole location. It look absolutely amazing, and I was left speechless after watching that scene, and that is the kind of experience that the film provides for the viewer.
The movie is truly breathtaking in almost every aspect. I cannot recommend this movie enough, as it was such a privilege for myself to watch and enjoy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
OlavLNov 10, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very good movie. The characters have good chemistry, the scenes are an even mix of depressing and beautiful, and the effects are just amazing. I saw this movie in IMAX, and it did not disappoint. I ended up really liking the main character, and the deaths throughout were really affecting. I also loved how the film tackled the uselessness of war, showing in harrowing detail how many lives were lost for nothing. The way the movie ends in an almost exact replica of the first shot, and reminds you only a day has passed, really makes you think about the endless circle that war feels like. Its a little too long, and a couple of the guest stars felt a little forced, but it was a good movie overall.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Dan_BDec 13, 2020
It runs 1917 on the French front. Two British Army corporals, William Schofield and Tom Blake (George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman, respectively) are sent to carry a note to stop the offensive of another English battalion on German linesIt runs 1917 on the French front. Two British Army corporals, William Schofield and Tom Blake (George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman, respectively) are sent to carry a note to stop the offensive of another English battalion on German lines that he believes are in retreat, when in fact the Germans fell back there to ambush him. A true suicide mission, stimulated however by the incentive of Blake's reunion with his brother in that battalion.

1917 is an astonishing immersive experience in the horrors of the trench warfare of World War I, filmed in a (almost) shot sequence that accompanies the protagonists at all times, so the film takes place practically in real time. At certain times, the warlike character gives way practically to horror movies. The anecdote, then, is minimal, as well as the characters. The power of images, sound and music (by Thomas Newman) is prodigious. Roger Deakins' photography (multi-award winning, as well as the film in general) is beautiful and his twists are fundamental in creating the different climates of the film. There is a nocturnal sequence that is simply anthological because of its tension, its aesthetics and the variety of feelings and sensations that it brings into play and produces.

Some critics have objected to this film by the eclectic Sam Mendes two central aspects that in my opinion are virtues. One of them is that the adventures of the protagonists and the sequence shot in motion resemble the perception of the film to the experience of a video game. And will it not be the other way around? Video games simply don't reflect the experience of war and especially now with its remote and virtual control aspects? The First War was a labyrinthine trench warfare.

The other criticism is the lack of "personal history" of the protagonists, which would take away psychological depth. 1917 in this sense resembles Dunkirk: it addresses its characters in media res, that is, in the middle of the battle front. Well, I must say that this "lack" and the simplicity of their motivations places the protagonists in the shoes of true "anonymous soldiers."

1917 is one of those films that one regrets not having seen in the cinema, a cinematographic display with capital letters at the service of a war story where despair and duty go hand in hand.Astonishing immersive experience in the horrors of the trench warfare of World War… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
kittykoo6447Dec 27, 2020
Well written and acted, understated emotional impact, great suspense leading to its climax
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DCosloff1999Jan 8, 2021
I do love War movies. I don't know which I like more 1917 or Dunkirk. They are both phenomenal.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AuthoJan 17, 2021
In my opinion, it was pretty tense and entertaining. Although maybe it was because I watched it on a plane, with a massive headache.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
iCampoRamilNov 16, 2021
Un peliculón de inicio a final. Una manera de hacer cine sensacional, me encanta.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AJ_13Jan 11, 2021
Great war film. Definitely filming it in a long take was a great decision and makes it a really immersive movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DonnieTrumpJan 28, 2021
The 'everything recorded in one shot' technique is made famous by Mexican director Alejandro Iñárritu and Sam Mendez has applied this technique in the same way for 1917. It brings you closer to the action where the viewer follows the actionsThe 'everything recorded in one shot' technique is made famous by Mexican director Alejandro Iñárritu and Sam Mendez has applied this technique in the same way for 1917. It brings you closer to the action where the viewer follows the actions of a two soldiers that have the order to stop a battle. The biggest attraction of this movie is however the theme of isolation throughout their campaign. That feeling of isolation is conveyed in a believable and immersive way. The cinematography is one of the greatest in recent history, but the plot is unfortunately a little bit shallow and the movie has also a (misplaced) melancholic sentiment. Small mistakes in a enjoyable movie experience.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MattFornerFeb 10, 2021
1917 is the pinnacle of filmmaking and my favorite movie of 2019. Sam Mendes went above and beyond with his WWI epic. From the personal, up-close one-take cinematography approach to the believable characters, 1917 is filmmaking at its best.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Dunder-MifflinMar 6, 2021
There are few movies that really convey the horrors of WW1 as well as the true beauty of human compassion and kindness even in the hardest and most brutal of enviroments - 1917 does just that. The 'single-shot' style puts us right in theThere are few movies that really convey the horrors of WW1 as well as the true beauty of human compassion and kindness even in the hardest and most brutal of enviroments - 1917 does just that. The 'single-shot' style puts us right in the action as we follow two British soldiers tasked with warning a battallion that the attack they are planning is a German trap design to lure them in. The set design is simply brilliant, the dead horses, rotten corpses embeded in the dirt, destroyed trees and houses makes it clear that the war has not just taken its toll on the land, but became a part of it.

The story-telling is another major highlight as are its characters, they are flawed, make silly mistakes but they are also compassionate, kind and with loved ones that they hope they will all be returning to, even if that increasingly becomes a vain hope - ultimately they are human.

Ultimately it is a masterpiece in story-telling that anyone who is passionate about cinema should see at least once in their life-time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
alivemau5Mar 29, 2021
if theres one thing you should watch the movie for, its the beautifully done cinematography, but you already know that probably from the awards its won. Why are you even still reading this, just watch it already.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Sarian263Mar 15, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A movie that shows just how horrific but also how heroic our soldiers were during the First World War. Thing about this movie that makes it work so well is that the majority of the movie is all across one take. So from the start to the end, You are following these two young soldiers, these two young lads go through literal hell and all the time your watching it, your biting your nails and on the edge of your seat hoping that they don't get ambushed. The moments where the characters are resting in a open area, you as the audience member are watching around to see if there is anyone there the characters have missed. Almost as if we as the audience are the third member of the group. Fantastic movie well worth a watch!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
jovincenMay 2, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Beautiful movie focuses on amazing scenery and themes and characters. Supporting characters were well written and great. The main characters.... and are horribly flawed and a massive let down.

I really wanted to enjoy the movie but found the 2 main characters totally ruined the movie for me. I found their story ark, decision making and follow through very frustrating... First 30 minutes was the best part of the movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
HepkunApr 19, 2021
1917 is a thrilling war documentary and also a breathtaking film, the whole movie was edited in almost one cut, until the last few minutes of the film i didn't see a single cut. the immersion in this movie made feel like i was actually there1917 is a thrilling war documentary and also a breathtaking film, the whole movie was edited in almost one cut, until the last few minutes of the film i didn't see a single cut. the immersion in this movie made feel like i was actually there and it also had very good pacing with compiling all the information in the running time, the rating i would give this movie is an 8/10, great plot, great acting, great directing and amazing visuals.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
M7AMDMar 5, 2023
i didn't know how good this movie was and I didn't know that I would be hooked from the beginning to the end, cast and scenery and direction were really good, I liked how the whole movie was filmed using 1 camera following the protagonisti didn't know how good this movie was and I didn't know that I would be hooked from the beginning to the end, cast and scenery and direction were really good, I liked how the whole movie was filmed using 1 camera following the protagonist along which added more into how horrifying the war is and thrilling journey.

i rarely rate movies 10 out of 10 but this war movie unlike many others has some uniqueness which again thanks to the direction and the places they chose to film, I highly recommend to give it try.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Dam02Jun 5, 2021
A "MASTER PIECE".amazing, shocking,
exciting ... it's one of my favorite movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
EmmalynnJun 23, 2021
Outstanding story, a story you could hear from one of your relatives and such a sad truth about the time and the horrific times of world war 1. Best cinematography I’ve seen in awhile, and amazing performances by whole cast.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021
Playing like Alfred Hitchcock's "Rope" where the film is simulated to be all done in one take, "1917" could have easily been more gritty and ambitious with its subject matter and film techniques, but it nonetheless delivers as a characterPlaying like Alfred Hitchcock's "Rope" where the film is simulated to be all done in one take, "1917" could have easily been more gritty and ambitious with its subject matter and film techniques, but it nonetheless delivers as a character study with a solid grasp on the awful historic war.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Romal_maithreeSep 8, 2021
This is an absolutely a greatest movie ever produced with beautiful pictures, beaitiful music and clever acting. We always see violence in war movies. But in this movie we can't see much violence and movie contains lots of drama with a warThis is an absolutely a greatest movie ever produced with beautiful pictures, beaitiful music and clever acting. We always see violence in war movies. But in this movie we can't see much violence and movie contains lots of drama with a war sorrounding. This is a very natural movie. The meatscore f This is absolutely a masterpiece of sam mendes. And the music direction is outstanding. Absolutely this is a magneficient creation. Top class movie ever. Outstanding work by the directors and producers.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AgentLviJul 21, 2023
Great movie. The story is decent. The scoring is great, visual is really amazing, the voice & sound is also amazing
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Hbrass23Mar 9, 2022
Movie is kinda boring outside of being artsy and it's hard to enjoy an artsy movie with really bad editing. There's multiple points where people are being shot at and the bullets are magically flying from the opposite direction
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DarkwingSchmuckJul 27, 2023
1917 is as much of a showcase for Roger Deakins as anything -- as if he needed it. This is very much deserving of its comparisons to Dunkirk, or even something like The Revenant or Gravity; a film to watch for its technical merits, historical1917 is as much of a showcase for Roger Deakins as anything -- as if he needed it. This is very much deserving of its comparisons to Dunkirk, or even something like The Revenant or Gravity; a film to watch for its technical merits, historical significance, and high stakes action more so than for any sort of strong emotional core or story thread.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
FunGaminghdApr 29, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Der Film ist sehr Spannend und die Story ist auch gut geschrieben. Die Schauspieler machen ihren Job auch Super. Dennoch hat der Film in der Mitte eine Kleine Phase wo er nicht so Spannend ist. Das gleicht aber der Rest aus… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MarlaIsBackJun 24, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Very well directed by Sam Mendes, some scenes like the "poor wayfaring stranger" scene are very powerful.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RekiazJan 17, 2023
Solo los efectos y fotografía me encantaron, lo demás es bueno, pero no memorable para mí.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CarlElmoreNov 22, 2022
The cinematography and lighting are absolutely amazing but the characters and writing are just okay.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
leandroo17Jan 30, 2023
fanstatic film,the best of its kind I ever watched,immersive camera plan,good characters and the environments are some of the strengths of this work of art
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
saplignFeb 2, 2023
cool‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎cool‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Salvatore506Jul 28, 2023
Muy buena pelicula, te deja ver como era la vida en la primera guerra mundial muy recomendable, de lo mejorcito de prime video 9/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ObsessedMeatJun 6, 2023
This movie is OK. Many movies on World War I were made, and many are better than this, even if its enjoyable.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
zrsafarJun 22, 2023
I've never been so impressed by a film's cinematography ever in my life. Fantastic movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
leraje9Sep 9, 2023
The fact that it was recorded in one take is already an achievement, excellent acting
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
next
Page:
More From This Movie

78 Critic Reviews

8.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL