Read User Reviews and Submit your own for 1917 - Page 2

10

HihihahahohoDec 15, 2020

Dumb critics. This movie MUST have at least 90 point combined. Watching 1917 is something truly special. Just a piece of art

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

OlivierPielJan 18, 2020

Why set this movie in 1917? That year was the most immobile miserable part of the war on the Western front! Setting this aside, we are constantly reminded of the technical prowess ("look at this trenchline that goes on forever", "what aWhy set this movie in 1917? That year was the most immobile miserable part of the war on the Western front! Setting this aside, we are constantly reminded of the technical prowess ("look at this trenchline that goes on forever", "what a beautifully lit night scene"...) at the expense of any real sense of involvement and feelings apart from the death of the first protagonist. Some scenes are so caricatural and preposterous it reminded me of the worst in the Revenant. Some reviewers felt like in a computer game, and they are right!… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

3

TwiTuMar 18, 2020

The main actors are good and believable, except for a few situations that werent authentic, like soldiers in WW1 would have reacted.
And thats the only good thing about this movie.
The rest reminded me of the plot of bad video games (incl.The main actors are good and believable, except for a few situations that werent authentic, like soldiers in WW1 would have reacted.
And thats the only good thing about this movie.
The rest reminded me of the plot of bad video games (incl. massive plot holes, like one area being extremely muddy and wet and then they only move a few hundred meters further on and its suddenly dry as a desert with dust blowing up, etc.).
The action scenes were basically exactly like a video game where the main guy doesnt get hit at all (or if he does, he doesnt care much, because he just gets a healthkit) and his enemies dont know how to use a rifle or how to stop a human at all.
Especially the scenes in Écoust are extremely unrealistic, and literally reminded me of a certain video game. And the sniper scene was so bad that that German sniper should have shot that guy 20 times. Especially at the last shot, where he knew EXACTLY where the guy was gonna pop up again.
Also the main guy going out without seeking cover in a flare-lit town where everyone can see him was face palm inducing. Again he wasnt hit at all.

Also there are many reports that made all the reactions in this movie look weird: Soldiers actually were very often reluctant to shoot or otherwise kill people. Especially in situations where they didnt have peer pressure or pressure from an officer (and thats why military training was massively altered after WW1, to make people more willing to shoot other people), which happen often in this movie. But even then they wouldnt try to kill people. Does the movie try to explain the bad shots with this? If so, that would be stupid, because especially in the scene where he is caught alone by a lone soldier, they wouldnt have fired at him at all, since he didnt even make an effort to shoot at them either. Him shooting first, trying to get cover and shooting back, instead of hoping that these guys were utter bad shots, would have made sense, since hes on such an important mission. But he didnt. The funny thing is, the drunk guy was the one that placed his shot as close to him as the sniper did, while all others couldnt hit a barn door from point blank.

Then theres the scene with the airplane crash that simply was stupid. Why would the pilot act that way? It made no sense whatsoever. Pilots on both sides were actually one of the most honorable people back then. They had mutual "fair play" rules that would be impossible nowadays or even in WW2. Totally unbelievable.

All in all the movie felt a lot like Fury. Fury also had many of these unrealistic situations that simply could not be true, which made it seem like a propaganda film right out of that time.
Same with this movie.
But they obviously made a huge effort to find out if there were really many racial minorities serving in Europe in the British Army. Should have put that effort into other research, too. For example the accuracy of German rifles and the differences in training of German and British soldiers.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

4

GinaKJan 17, 2020

A very long, very dull, more or less competent war movie. The only reason I made it through was the acting, which was believable if a bit naive in style and often bordered on the sentimental. Anyone who manages to sit through this movieA very long, very dull, more or less competent war movie. The only reason I made it through was the acting, which was believable if a bit naive in style and often bordered on the sentimental. Anyone who manages to sit through this movie deserves an Academy Award more than the director.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

10

Compi24Jan 12, 2020

It is a rare, rare thing for me to feel as though I need to unsheathe the "M-word" from my vocabulary after seeing a movie. Though, with Sam Mendes's "1917" freshly in mind, I find the experience impossible to describe without dropping it atIt is a rare, rare thing for me to feel as though I need to unsheathe the "M-word" from my vocabulary after seeing a movie. Though, with Sam Mendes's "1917" freshly in mind, I find the experience impossible to describe without dropping it at least once. I don't think I've seen a filmic narrative since "The Revenant" that's more adequately aligned itself with the term "journey" than this one has. It is a wild, traumatic, and relentlessly thrilling, near-real-time chronicling of a fateful day in the lives of so many that I find infinitely more epic in scope and theme than any movie I've seen in the past few years -- and some of those had more than triple the budget Mendes had at his disposal. This is what moviemaking is all about. So many moments come to pass throughout where not only the acting and writing, but the camerawork, production design, music, and thematics are firing on all cylinders, welling up feelings of wonderment, terror, anxiety, despair and grief at various points in a magnificently well-paced 2-hour running time. They absolutely do not make movies like this very often, so do yourself a favor and immediately treat yourself to viewing this masterpiece in the biggest theater you have near you.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

Rebecca31Jan 19, 2020

Set during WWI, two young British soldiers Schofield (George MacKay) and Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) are given an impossible mission, to deliver a message to call off a planned attack that would see 1,600 men walk straight into a trap. 1917Set during WWI, two young British soldiers Schofield (George MacKay) and Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) are given an impossible mission, to deliver a message to call off a planned attack that would see 1,600 men walk straight into a trap. 1917 follows these two soldiers on their deadly mission across enemy territory. You're going to feel every minute of this film because it's a outstanding story and a masterclass in film making.
MacKay and Chapman quickly meld into their characters, you can no longer see the acting and you're thrown headfirst into this incredibly tense film. Throughout 1917 you could hear a pin drop it was that quiet, and my local cinema generally tends to sound something like a zoo at the best of times so for it to be that quiet is almost unheard of. With a nearly sold out screen, every single person was fully immersed in this spectacular War film. Expertly directed by Sam Mendes and complimented by a haunting soundtrack by Thomas Newman. The score is beautiful and it looks like it will be a very close competition between Newman and Hildur Guðnadóttir's Joker soundtrack.
I should have known the cinematographer was Roger Deakins and his decision to film 1917 as a series of long takes is extremely bold and ambitious. At nearly two hours it plays out like one continuous shot, it's truly stunning and I can't imagine the amount of work that went into that. The sweeping camera work is skilfully done and it's near impossible to see the edits. All the behind the scenes work should pay off because I believe 1917 is going to clean up at the Oscars and rightly so. If you've made it this far without seeing the trailer then keep it that way because the trailer does this film no justice. It honestly gave me the impression that this was a generic Oscar bait war movie. This far from the case, 1917 is an original take on a war film and I know it's early in the year to say this but we've already seen one of the best films of the year. A film that needs to be seen on the big screen, so what are you waiting for, get to a cinema and see 1917. Highly recommended.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

JPKJan 12, 2020

Incredible
1917 is brutal, brilliantly acted, and fantastically filmed and definitely deserves all the award nominations it's getting.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

10

GamerLifeeJan 19, 2020

Best movie of the year. cinematic photography in this movie is amazing, it hooks you into the movie and makes you feel like you are with the two young soldiers. The story was so well writen and kept me hooked all the way through, the film.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

d0vla11Jan 10, 2020

What a great war movie. Cinematography and acting were phenomenal, also the score blown me away.

Definitely in top 5 war movies ever.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

claire1205Jan 8, 2020

good,amazing,...............nice.........interesting movie..... love it...................................................

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

BatMiteJan 9, 2020

An intense and perilous journey seen through the eyes of two young soldiers that are tossed into this mission: stopping their fellow British troops from advancing and falling into a ambush. The film follows what seems to be two young andAn intense and perilous journey seen through the eyes of two young soldiers that are tossed into this mission: stopping their fellow British troops from advancing and falling into a ambush. The film follows what seems to be two young and fairly inexperienced troops as they fight the elements and their own fears through foreign land to save their fellow soldiers from a trap from the opposing forces. The story has its moments of intense, stressful situations weaved with some time to let the audience breathe a sigh of relief, if only for a second or two. The visuals are what keep the performances and the writing tied together. There are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the war itself, some things never seem to change.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

4

ibbsteDec 26, 2019

Typically, if you're going to employ an ostentatious filmmaking device it should be to serve a story. Unfortunately, in 1917, the story is completely perfunctory in the service of a gimmick that got old after Hitchcock already perfected it inTypically, if you're going to employ an ostentatious filmmaking device it should be to serve a story. Unfortunately, in 1917, the story is completely perfunctory in the service of a gimmick that got old after Hitchcock already perfected it in Rope. Deakins' consistency in tracking is impressive, I suppose, and there are some interesting images, but it is far from being one of the more interesting photographic achievements in film this year, and it really did feel like watching friends playing a video game right down to adjusting angles/perspectives and the occasionally random side characters say throwaway lines and breaks where you hear some random superior officer give expository dialogue directing the player on where they should be headed next.

As a history buff, I do think there's a valuable opportunity to present a proper World War I film to audiences who otherwise know very little about the context that led to the second World War, of which the marketplace is saturated with by comparison. There were some details that give context to the event, but it does little to nothing to offer audiences a substantive idea of the true horrors of the war other than the occasionally panning to a decomposing body part or blunt exposition in a speaking manner that no soldier of the time would speak like. The characters were supposed to show camaraderie but acted like any display of affection or sympathy for one another would have come with a fear of a contemporary "no homo" from their fellow soldiers (by comparison, see 1927's "Wings" where the men practically make out with each other in the end). Your friend is dying and not even a hug or kiss on the forehead before leaving him? You meet someone coming to terms with profound loss and a simple handshake suffices? Men in that time were not that self-conscious.

The climax of the film is the only sequence of the film I felt was truly gripping and felt any real stakes, until it goes right back into Saving Private Richard Madden at the end. Is the story *at all* interesting? No. Is it well made? Not particularly, unless a "well made" film is divorced from any sense of purpose or meaning to filming something logistically challenging! Sadly I thought this film was rather silly and a profoundly missed opportunity.… Expand

4 of 14 users found this helpful410

All this user's reviews

3

GimbuJan 15, 2020

3. Not much different than your average war movie..................................

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

5

zmgalen2000Dec 28, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Allow me to start with a disclaimer: 1917 is an excellently-acted and directed film whose aesthetics are visually captivating. It truly is worthy of the cinematic praise it is receiving. However, where it falls short is its historical significance and missed-out enlightening opportunities. With a one-dimensional plot solely focused on the trek of one soldier to deliver a letter (sans providing any relevant historical context), 1917 is a suspenseful, gripping film whose appeal slowly fades throughout its repetitive runtime of just under two hours. Don't get me wrong -- the film is a fabulous source of entertainment and certainly a cinematic masterpiece. As a historical piece, however, 1917 lacks the poignancy that would have made the film a complete home-run, stopping at around third base.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

6

RTMJan 5, 2020

The movie was tense, and gorgeously shot, but with so many limitations. I see where Mendes was going with this, in the way of wanting the viewer to see art, and the tension accomplished with the one long take. The problem is the long singleThe movie was tense, and gorgeously shot, but with so many limitations. I see where Mendes was going with this, in the way of wanting the viewer to see art, and the tension accomplished with the one long take. The problem is the long single shot approach here, can be exhausting, and not particularly enjoyable with this narrative. Great performances by the two young boys. But again, the development of the characters was minimal. I found myself just wanting it to be over, and not caring about them much. Lastly, for a war time movie, it was actually boring. Not enough to keep the viewer engaged. I witnessed many in the theater squirming and getting restless. Not exactly the reaction I'd expect. Overall a good movie that I wanted to be great. In the end I found myself looking for a "Saving Private Ryan" or "The Thin Red Line" type of movie.… Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

1

DoxdivaJan 24, 2020

After 45 minutes of boredom, we left. What we saw was painfully slow and uninteresting...the dialogue stilted. American Beauty on the other hand was so cleverly designed and executed...what happened, Sam?

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

10

wanted99Jan 17, 2020

This movie is a special war epic,its a simple story with a simple characters acted by the actors in a good way,not OMG!!,comparing it to the other perfomaces in this year,this movie if its shot in a regular way it will not be special,as iThis movie is a special war epic,its a simple story with a simple characters acted by the actors in a good way,not OMG!!,comparing it to the other perfomaces in this year,this movie if its shot in a regular way it will not be special,as i said its a simple story that consecncrete on those character mission that we connect with them by the one shot,its showing a different enemy in war not the germans ,the time and the atmosphere ,that shown in a beautifull way by roger deakens ,its not showing heroek stuff that make us want to go to war and be like them,its vs the war ,and its so entertainment ,i was near my seat in some scenes and the adranaline with connecting the event with the great music by this picture ,from certain angle its like dunkirk that show the reality of war ,and its vs the war like kubric's epic paths of glory,and this movie has to be written beside best war classics like the one that i wrote ,and its has some negaives because every movie has, but you avoide them and its the best war movie in the dicade .… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

3

netflicJan 14, 2020

The latest movie from a talented director Sam Mendes, who made "American Beauty", one of my most favorite movies. Nominated for 10 Oscars, it just won Golden Globe award. Our expectations were high, obviously.

How could Sam Mendes, afterThe latest movie from a talented director Sam Mendes, who made "American Beauty", one of my most favorite movies. Nominated for 10 Oscars, it just won Golden Globe award. Our expectations were high, obviously.

How could Sam Mendes, after "American Beauty", make a film like "1917"?
A question comes to my mind, Did the director watch that movie?
It only made sense when comparing to Nikita Mikhalkov.
A film that was supposed to be a serious war drama turned out to be a video game filled with all kinds of cliches.
"Saving Private Ryan" - 2 it is not.
To begin with the episode inside German bunker which made me think something like "WTF?!"
Two protagonists enter it, notice it is rigged with explosives, and immediately there is an explosion. Half of the bunker falls on top of one of the two, with pieces up to two feet each. He lied there, trapped under those rocks, not breathing. The other one starts digging him out. The way he was handling those rocks, their weight had to be a pound or two, with density of a pillow. When the first guy was finally completely out, he could not either move or see. In a few minutes his vision was back, and he could even run. As a person with first-hand knowledge what falling rocks do to a human body, my suspicion was more that justified.

Closer to the end of the movie, the same protagonist jumps into a river that looked like a calm small city river that after the jump turned into a white water torrent. Not every experienced rafter would be able to get out of it, not even mentioning wearing a backpack and high boots. Then the guy gets into a waterfall, falls 100 or so feet down and then quietly swims ashore in a nice freestyle stroke.
Even corpses of soldiers here and there cause laughter instead of horror. I do not think it was intended. A movie about WWI, a horrific and senseless slaughterhouse, that gobbled the whole generation, deserves better than a-la Indiana Jones style flick.
If you want to see what WWI really looked like, there is a documentary "They shall never grow old" made completely out of restored reels of that times.… Expand

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

6

GreatMartinJan 10, 2020

Right now "1917" having already winning the Best Picture Golden Globe is the front runner for Best Picture Oscar. After seeing the picture it is obvious that the visual technique of director's Sam Mendes's collaboration with cinematographerRight now "1917" having already winning the Best Picture Golden Globe is the front runner for Best Picture Oscar. After seeing the picture it is obvious that the visual technique of director's Sam Mendes's collaboration with cinematographer Roger Deakins is what makes this movie rate so high. It looks like the picture has been made in one continuous take with 2-3 exceptions which are carefully explained in the script by Sam Mendes, with the help of Krysty-Wilson Cairns and based on stories told by his uncle Alfred Mendes.

The story is a basic one of two young British soldiers who have to deliver a message to stop a raid which would be a deathtrap for 1600 men, one being a brother of one of the soldiers. One of the illogical parts of the script is that the two men are are too inexperienced to take on a task but 1) going to the movies in most cases you have to park your logic out in the lobby and 2) this takes place at the beginning of the movie when you are caught up in the film's technique so by the time you get involved with the story itself they have picked up much needed experience along with many coincidences that might not ring true.

The two leads, Dean-Charles Chapman and George MacKay, are more than adequate, with one carrying a heavier load than the other, while there are many cameos from such actors as Colin Firth, Benedict Cumberbatch, Richard Madden, Daniel Mays and Claire Duburcq.

"1917" is interesting for the way it appears to have been filmed but there have been much better war movies in the past and certainly better movies in 2019.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

3

lunanulJan 20, 2020

Overall, this was an epic dud with an abundance of carefully-constructed visuals and set pieces that are mostly devoid of emotional impact (with a few solid exceptions, to be fair). File under 'one shot wonder': a filming technique that isOverall, this was an epic dud with an abundance of carefully-constructed visuals and set pieces that are mostly devoid of emotional impact (with a few solid exceptions, to be fair). File under 'one shot wonder': a filming technique that is practically guaranteed to land the director in the Oscars pool, regardless of content. Much of the time, the viewing experience was akin to watching a video game; sometimes, a quite silly, unrealistic video game. Those interested in WWI are advised to check out the superior "They Shall Not Grow Old" - a documentary on WWI by Peter Jackson.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

0

lukelewisMar 11, 2020

Very boring. Do not waste your time/money. I wanted to scream this movie sucks about half way through.

3 of 19 users found this helpful316

All this user's reviews

0

antoniomitJan 13, 2020

Muy mala la pelicula, justo llega el momento que crees que habra algo mas y cae en picado

3 of 25 users found this helpful322

All this user's reviews

3

Phix105Apr 7, 2021

Cinematography was horrible. I felt like they were going to run the camera up the butt of the actors any minute, plus it was shake, and make me dizzy. The story was boring. I don't know why it was rated so high. To each their own. I made itCinematography was horrible. I felt like they were going to run the camera up the butt of the actors any minute, plus it was shake, and make me dizzy. The story was boring. I don't know why it was rated so high. To each their own. I made it to the sniper, and turned it off.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

DexEngineerSep 26, 2022

I enjoyed the movie and would watch it again. Great time. Very believable scenery and concept. Visually amazing. If you would like to experience a good story, watch it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

WhySoSerious54Nov 24, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An unoriginal WW1 version of Saving Private Ryan. Like Force Awakens and Ghostbusters Afterlife you feel you've seen this before and better. The single shot technique makes the movie feel drawn out and boring. I felt like a few quick edits and a flashback or two similar to All Quite while using a new original story would have helped. I watched it a second time and couldn't finish due to the obvious set up sequences that attempt to shift tone and fails. Typically you're not thrilled when falls. This i was like thankfully this annoyance is gone.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

SteyrausDec 16, 2021

Amazing, haunting film. The single shot 10 minute trek through No Man's Land is some of the best shot I've ever scene.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

eagleeyevikingApr 21, 2020

While the screenplay can feel mawkish, "1917" is still a technically masterful, immersive, and impeccably shot WW1 drama.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

jacob4Jan 18, 2020

1917 is truly a marvelous fantastic war film like no other! You must see this movie to truly appreciate every aspect of this amazing movie. Everything about this movie is just magnificent, from the action, to the story, to the incredible feat1917 is truly a marvelous fantastic war film like no other! You must see this movie to truly appreciate every aspect of this amazing movie. Everything about this movie is just magnificent, from the action, to the story, to the incredible feat of filming the entire movie in like two long continuous takes! An absolute thrill ride from start to finish with plenty of thrills and some heart wrenching moments thrown in there as well. Definitely one of the greatest feat in cinematic history!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

condythugFeb 1, 2020

excellent ww1 movie; nicely shot without gratuitous blood and gore. actors are generally ok although it might be an even better movie if it had top quality actors to bring out the characters.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

KamamuraFeb 29, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Alice in Wonderland, this time in WW1 settings. Wrap three layers of plot armor around your body and stumble with your invulnerable main protagonist through drunken-like series of seductive, yet hard-to-believe but Oscar-ready imagery where most characters are just paper-thin cut-outs of this artificially dramatized Betlem of strangely sanitary war horrors, finished with liberal helpings of ham-fisted symbolism. Sakura blossoms falling into the river signifying the vanity of human efforts and hopes? Check, got those! Maria with innocent child, saved by a field flask of milk randomly filled from a fly-infested burnt farm? Check! Although the Sam/Frodo dynamics dies early with the demise of Sam who learns the hard way about the risks of saving big Germans from crashed planes, Frodo is not alone on his quest for Mordor - others went "the other way around the barn", and strangely get way ahead of him, to hand him a helping hand, a helpful truck ride and useful info as needed, so that next computer-generated marvel can seamlessly pick up the drama where the last moment left off. From miles and miles of barren farmland to immediately adjacent ruins filled with devious snipers, to ruined houses filled with desperate survivors to lush forest full of troops getting ready for that last push, not bothering even to post simple sentries. Run parallel to charging troops through the frontline, through both friendly and enemy fire, because what the heck, we are the camera wrapped up in plot armor. Be there just in time to save private Ryan to finally rest against the Silver Tree of Lothlorien. So much drama and pretty choreography (at the expense of believable story, historical accuracy and well, common sense). What, no Oscar? Blimey, mate, maybe next time, eh?… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

GeorgemortinJan 11, 2020

Esta película es una obra de arte, y solo con la forma de ser dirigida con esos largos planos secuencia merece ser vista en el cine.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

Kalele005Jan 13, 2020

i don't go watch movie in theater often in fact i don't go at all but i listenened what the director of the movie said it's a movie made to be experienced on a big screen so i did go watch it in theater and he was right, that movie is such ani don't go watch movie in theater often in fact i don't go at all but i listenened what the director of the movie said it's a movie made to be experienced on a big screen so i did go watch it in theater and he was right, that movie is such an emotive experience i'm quite young and can easy relate to the characters,i love both main character and i felt their friendship i just think that dean chapman death felt really early in the story they should have develop the friendship the two character more but life can be inpredictable i think it was the desire to the writer to shock peoples if it was i was really sad about his death,the movie other than that is almost a masterpiece not everyone will agree with me it's a movie to entertain people it did is job, i just think that other countries aren't the ennemy but in that movie they are shown as such it's war peoples were crazy as a human being that movie just shown me a reality that i hope will never be again, let's be wise humankind,that movie was entertaining,hearthbreaking and intense, sam mandes is really a good director and a good human being. I don't regret any second of it, i didn't seen time go by,it's a movie who would deserved a 3hours long experience! =) i hope sam mandes will do other movies with that high quality and emotion drive i'll go more often in cinema watch his work. He deserve the oscar 2020.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

PanchogulJan 11, 2020

Una instantánea obra maestra en todos los aspectos posibles, a nivel técnico es perfecta, el montaje de la película está hecho de forma tal que de la impresión de ser un permanente plano secuencia, lo que hará que el espectador se mantengaUna instantánea obra maestra en todos los aspectos posibles, a nivel técnico es perfecta, el montaje de la película está hecho de forma tal que de la impresión de ser un permanente plano secuencia, lo que hará que el espectador se mantenga atento a la pantalla pudiendo apenas pestañear, la banda sonora y edición de sonido son impecablemente asombrosos y el diseño de producción es maravilloso. A nivel actoral es inmejorable, al protagonista lo vemos permanentemente expuesto a la cámara por lo que podemos ponernos fácilmente en sus zapatos, su rango emocional es bastante discreto pero bien logrado, podemos ver cómo progresivamente es devastado por todas las situaciones vividas en la cinta, no es una actuación a nivel de grandes premiaciones, pero es muy buena sin duda alguna.

Le ganó el Globo de Oro a Mejor Película al Joker y siendo objetivo, merece todos los premios a Mejor Película, Mejor Montaje y Mejor Fotografía, quizás también Mejor Sonido y Banda Sonora.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

SrPepeJan 24, 2020

1917 es una película excelente, la producción, el sonido, la fotografía, todo es excelente y personalmente me atrapo desde los primeros minutos.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Lone_Wolf_SonesFeb 3, 2020

Following They Shall Not Grow Old, 1917 is the latest WW1 film to hit the silver screen. While They Shall Not Grow Old is more accurate by virtue of the use of actual footage and documentary style? 1917 is still inspired by the real accountsFollowing They Shall Not Grow Old, 1917 is the latest WW1 film to hit the silver screen. While They Shall Not Grow Old is more accurate by virtue of the use of actual footage and documentary style? 1917 is still inspired by the real accounts of director Sam Mendes'grandfather. Mendes has made it clear that 1917 is a fictional story with fictional characters. However that doesn't mean it doesn't feel authentic. Much like They Shall Not Grow Old; 1917 gets much of it's authenticity from the way it is crafted. Filmed/manufactured to give the impression of one long continuous shot, you are made to feel like your right there with these characters. Your there in the claustrophobic confines of the trenches as well as the misery and muck of no man's land.

If the film has one flaw? It's that the characters themselves aren't all that well developed. But given the way the movie is filmed I am willing to forgive that because of how ambitious it is. It's also fair I think that these two men are just two ordinary men that are given a herculean task (as shown in the trailers). They are caught up in events bigger than themselves. We do get small snippets and vignettes that give us an idea of what these characters are like. But don't go in expecting something like Band of Brothers where you see characters grow and change over the course of several episodes. It's not the underlying point of this movie. There are some spectacular moments in the film that make you sit on the edge of your seat. Again I don't think you'd get the same experience if not for the way it was shot. This is a stunning technical achievement and a definite Oscar contender for cinematography.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

savvas1967Jan 11, 2020

Best film I’ve seen for years !!! A masterpiece of a movie .I did not expect this !! A brilliant absolutely astonishing film for an antiwar movie

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

UridonJan 12, 2020

war is bad, not much more to it. not bad not great
;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;xxfffffffffffffffffffffff

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

irbeguiFeb 4, 2020

a great movie, the camera, photography, the tension of it, without any cut, I really had many years without seeing a war movie that shows raw that it is and above all that focused on that, it's not the typical shooting movie and a hero thata great movie, the camera, photography, the tension of it, without any cut, I really had many years without seeing a war movie that shows raw that it is and above all that focused on that, it's not the typical shooting movie and a hero that can against all , you see human suffering, despair and above all the decline of the first world war, it really is a film that one should see if or if.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

PepeLobos1Jan 25, 2020

WENA PELICULA CULIA ENTERA DETONADA, UNA DE LAS MEJORES DEL 2019, CHUPA EL PICO PIÑERA, AGUANTE LA PRIMERA LINEA VIEJA.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Acoustic_TomJan 18, 2020

1917 is a visual storytelling masterpiece. The one shot camera is a visual feat that lends itself to the tragic tales of two soldiers delivering a message to a general on the western front.
Throughout the film there is a constant feeling of1917 is a visual storytelling masterpiece. The one shot camera is a visual feat that lends itself to the tragic tales of two soldiers delivering a message to a general on the western front.
Throughout the film there is a constant feeling of anxiety that you truly share with the characters as the camera never cuts. A true masterpiece of story, film… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

Harsh657Jan 19, 2020

1917 is a film that takes you on a journey that you won't forget your entire life. You will feel like you are with these 2 characters and you will every every emotion they feel. It feels like a one continuous shot and it is done with such1917 is a film that takes you on a journey that you won't forget your entire life. You will feel like you are with these 2 characters and you will every every emotion they feel. It feels like a one continuous shot and it is done with such perfection that you won't even notice if there was as cut.
Cinematography is outstanding and I think this time Roger Deakins will win an oscar.
The thing that can bother you is that it feels like a video-game. Also there are no emotional backstory given to the characters which is the only think that I have an issue with.
It is a must watch in theatre and I think everyone should experience this in theatres.
Grade: A-… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

ahmettvanMar 12, 2020

A regular movie that has the same strengths and weaknesses but I recommend watching the movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

GLADIADORJan 26, 2020

Filme muito bom, com cenas de ação incriveis, so acho ele lento ate demais, mais é um filme bonito de se assistir

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

TASOSJan 11, 2020

A breath-taking Masterpiece. You walk out the cinema and you ask your shelf what was that you saw. Cinephiles have to see this film twice, just to understand how was it shot. The movie of the decade!

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

DerekReideJan 11, 2020

1917...That's going to be a film I'll be talking about for a long time. Straight up, it's a war film masterpiece. It'll be the best movie of the year for a long time until I see more movies, but if anything, it'll be in my top 3. It's my1917...That's going to be a film I'll be talking about for a long time. Straight up, it's a war film masterpiece. It'll be the best movie of the year for a long time until I see more movies, but if anything, it'll be in my top 3. It's my favorite war film by far. The story is so humane, gutwrenching, and pure. The immersion and realism this film goes for is stunning. I swear, they shot the film in 2 halves. I don't think there was a single cut until a certain part of the film. And that's a very far point into the movie itself. If anything, there was probably one transition that I never noticed. My eyes were so locked on the screen and I just drifted into the movie as another soldier watching the events. My heart was pounding, I was fearful, but overall, I was so stunned and stoked that this movie lived higher than my anticipations. The climax sends chills, major intensity and squirms, and overall, sheer beauty with the cinematography. The visuals were incredibly captivating, the acting was stellar, and the production design was awesome. 1917 deserves all the awards it'll get. And that's saying something.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Lonewolf63Jan 22, 2020

1917,what can I say that others haven't already. Was it amazing, yes. Was the cinematography as good as described, yes. Did it feel real, yes. the only thing else I can say is .. War, war never changes.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

BrunoVn00Jan 22, 2020

This movie isn't about the characters or the story...This movie is an experience. Really if you think about the characters, they are pretty weak and underdeveloped, but at least the performances of the main actors are pretty good. The storyThis movie isn't about the characters or the story...This movie is an experience. Really if you think about the characters, they are pretty weak and underdeveloped, but at least the performances of the main actors are pretty good. The story is pretty straight-forward get to point A to point B and there isn't anything too special to it, but, like I said, this is more about the experience. This movie achieves to make the viewer feel part of the war, which I think that was the intention of the one-continuous take "gimmick" (which it isn't). This movie is called 1917 instead of "The Adventure of blue-eyed blond Soldier" (that's why the characters are forgettable, I can't remember their names) because the long take is what adds to the experience. Sure, the long take isn't obviously anything new and movies like Birdman (I know, they are completely different genres) make it better, but for this movie it works. Some moments feel slow and all but, again, it adds to the whole point of feeling part of the war. The sound design and the cinematography are great and the score, while sometimes it sounds like generic stock music, sometimes it sounds amazing. Overall, this movie is more about the experience than the characters or plot. I recommend it because is still a pretty good movie. I don't think it's a masterpiece or the best of the year but it is certainly a really well done film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

DiptanshuFeb 19, 2020

Wow!That ending was heart warming,literally from starting each and every moment was engaging but after sometime pacing was somewhat disturbed but tension and gripping was to the point great score,cinematography and good acting performances asWow!That ending was heart warming,literally from starting each and every moment was engaging but after sometime pacing was somewhat disturbed but tension and gripping was to the point great score,cinematography and good acting performances as well cameos were great!at last a good movie with crazy camera shots especially felt we are living in it!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

BeardedYodaJan 21, 2020

1917 is one of the best war films I have seen in a long time and the minor flaws in it don't hold back the film much at all. You have to see it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

BradMorganJan 18, 2020

This movie touches you. A portrait of the terrible reality that once took place. Emotional, powerfully and portrayed in a beautiful way (like a "one-take"). This film will stay with you!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Sierra-117Jan 23, 2020

1917, the most recent film by acclaimed director Sam Mendes (skyfall, American beauty), is a phenomenon to say the least. With a magnificent combination of excellent editing, superb acting and an outstanding score from Thomas Newman, 1917 is1917, the most recent film by acclaimed director Sam Mendes (skyfall, American beauty), is a phenomenon to say the least. With a magnificent combination of excellent editing, superb acting and an outstanding score from Thomas Newman, 1917 is a rare example of absolute cinematic perfection. Like 2014s Birdman (A personal favorite of mine) 1917 has been, to my delight cut so cleanly it gives the illusion of a single take and like Birdman, it works exceptionally conveying a feeling of realism and desperation never before seen in a film. The movie is to my understanding shot entirely in Scotland, and Mendes makes use of the stunning landscapes whilst also creating his own sets providing a dramatic and even shocking contrast between the two. For example, The film opens in a luscious field full of plants and other wildlife, but very quickly as our protagonists enter the trenches you are introduced to the desolate wastes of No mans’s land. Thomas Newman really does a fantastic job with the movie’s soundtrack, which feeds wonderfully into the already immersive atmosphere. It strikes the perfect balance of being calm and soft in some instances, or extremely intense in others. Another thing that really stood out was the incredible sound design. Here, every gunshot has weight, causing each and every one to make you question whether or not it landed.
The cast is also brilliant, with each actor giving stellar performances and countless cameos from well renowned figures such as Benedict Cumberbatch, Colin Firth, Mark Strong and Richard Madden. The story remains consistent throughout the film keeping you guessing and on the edge of your seat at all times, but some could (maybe) argue that there were some minor pacing issues, but other than that there is no more I can say.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

DMLYxCriticJan 23, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Gritty, violent, emotional and cathartic. These are the words that comes into mind after watching Sam Mendes' World War I take, 1917. Unlike any other war movies of late, this film seems to take on a fresher approach with its "one shot" cinematography, although it became quite problematic in the long run as the audiences get frustrated, wanting to see the whole thing. It also affected the editing, as some scenes that were supposedly essential are sacrificed for the singular shot cinematography. But it also has its perks, though, as it made the film much more grittier. Overall, this film is a wild ride into the horrors of the first World War, something that isn't quite tackled in any other war films.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MiloGrayJan 11, 2020

A cinematic masterpiece! Absolutely incredible acting with an incredible cast!! I’m definitely gonna see it again - if u read this - see 1917 now or I’ll cut ur throats

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

Hwinter07Jan 16, 2020

Best movie of the year in my opinion. Excellent cinematography and score coupled with the spectacular "long shot" style of filming.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

RaventhornJan 17, 2020

From the moment the movie begins to the end, the movie shows you the horrors of World War 1 and keeps you in suspense as to what will happen to the men and the mission. Great pace and suspense!

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

GeoaveneJan 1, 2020

O filme tem uma paisagem linda, elenco incrível. Mas a narrativa não me chamou atenção, o filme é confuso.

0 of 18 users found this helpful018

All this user's reviews

9

ChrisM1979Jan 20, 2020

As just a movie maybe it wasn't a 10 but for people interested in film making this was a masterpiece. As a movie alone I will give it an 8 but for what it achieved from a film making perspective a 10 so overall I'd give it a 9.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

DerekMedeirosJan 10, 2020

The best film I’ve seen all year, and that includes 2019. Beautifully shot and executed. Truly a mastery of cinematography. Can not recommend this movie more.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Swaggerdude11Jan 11, 2020

Phenomenal movie, gritty, dark, and most of all historically accurate to the brutalities of warfare.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

TheJokerxJan 12, 2020

1917 is one of the best movies I’ve ever seen don’t listen to the negative reviews and watch it yourself and by the way it was WAY better than Dunkirk

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

RaginglamottaJan 12, 2020

This movie is a classic which is hard to stomach and shows the horrors of war

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Cinemalover1Jan 12, 2020

The cinematography and the camera work wowww, this movie deserved best motion picture and best director at the globes

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

KingMercuryJan 12, 2020

1917 is one of the best war movies ever made, Hope it gets best cinematography and best score at the least

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

TheTerminatorrJan 12, 2020

1917 is one of the greatest achievements of 2019 of not the greatest, have been listening to the score for days now

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

QueenloverJan 12, 2020

1917 really captures the first WW in a captivating way and is 2019s best movie along with The Irishman

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

ThebaynewazeJan 12, 2020

One of the best movies I have ever seen in my life, thank you and good job Sam Mendes

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

Jamesbond008Jan 12, 2020

This is one of my favourite movies of all time, captivating performances by George McKay and Chapman, excellent cinematography and score wouldn’t be mad at all if this won best picture.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

FerreAndradeJan 25, 2020

Beautifully crafted film. Editing was seamless. And felt as if In one shot it was filmed. Stunning

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

MartyscorseseJan 12, 2020

A movie that was far better than Dunkirk, love this movie and hope it wins many academy awards

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

MaksCoolJan 14, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 9 из-за пары недочётов и фейл моментов. Но оно очень классное и великое и передоёт весь ужас войны… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

DasWizzyJan 15, 2020

1 Take is all you need I guess, ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

Photog1Jan 16, 2020

Do not listen to the bad reviews...this is a masterpiece. There are always critics who have to be the one bad review. This should win Best Picture.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

Jcummings2Jan 18, 2020

One of the most beautifully shot war movies I have ever seen. Nice story, very good acting. Great film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Cart3rJan 21, 2020

1917 is a masterpiece, breathtaking, it makes your heart beat fast from the beginning to the end. Great soundtrack.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MaciejkamilJan 25, 2020

It's a great movie, since not only does it show that being humane during the war will be used by the enemy, but it also shows the enemy who is a real threat, not a stormtrooper.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

Stream2BigScreeJan 28, 2020

A Race Against Time in 1917

The Stream: The storyline is completely unimportant. The Big Screen: Tremendous filming, scenery and intense moments. The Final Bill: Travel down the intense path less traveled in 1917. -S2S Welcome backA Race Against Time in 1917

The Stream: The storyline is completely unimportant.

The Big Screen: Tremendous filming, scenery and intense moments.

The Final Bill: Travel down the intense path less traveled in 1917.

-S2S

Welcome back everyone! This week we were able to get an early screening of the movie, 1917. 1917 hits the theaters in limited release on Christmas Day, but it doesn’t go wide until January 17, 2020. Let’s get to the nitty gritty of this World War I spectacle.

Let’s get the plot out of the way, as it is the most forgettable part of the movie. 1917 features two young British privates during the First World War. Of course, the “powers that be” give the most expendable pawns with the most to lose the “impossible mission”. The privates must deliver a message deep in enemy territory that is necessary to save the lives of 1,600 men. And yes, of course, one of the privates has a brother among that 1,600 that must be saved from walking straight into a deadly German trap. Now that the first 5 minutes of the movie are out of the way, we can get to the brilliance.

To me one of the most awesome feats of this movie is the single shot filming. Now, we all know it is impossible to shoot a nearly two hour movie in one shot flawlessly, but truly the editing and camerawork is amazing. The single shot view enhances the feel of anxiety and urgency. Throughout the movie, I felt as if I couldn’t take my eyes off the screen. One thing I can be certain of is that this movie will definitely receive consideration during award season, especially for the cinematography by Roger Deakins.

The filming was great in the execution but also in the setting/scenery. While most of the movie is flat and barren due to the war-torn wasteland, yet the actors take us on the path less travelled. Seriously, through the ups and downs of bunkers, craters, farmlands, waterways, etc. the film moves us. Speaking of moving us, Chapman and MacKay provide a few moving moments, lame ones as well. Both do a very good job conveying the emotional rollercoaster that 1917 and war in general provides to our brave soldiers in the field. The viewer truly follows the ebbs and flows of the privates from beginning to end. We see you King Tommen.

Long story short, 1917 is an intense, watch your every step, war epic that will garner Oscar buzz from its incredible camera work and set management. The storyline is the most basic it can get but that’s not why you’re going to this movie in the first place. Get a bucket of popcorn and chow down while you race (pensively) to the end.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

ecw0647Jan 28, 2020

Just a comment on the review by Orioniscool. He says:, "This movie did hit me on a personal note, my grant [sic] grandfather served for England in WW1 and he saw clips of the movie and now he is hooked." Assuming his great-grandfather wasJust a comment on the review by Orioniscool. He says:, "This movie did hit me on a personal note, my grant [sic] grandfather served for England in WW1 and he saw clips of the movie and now he is hooked." Assuming his great-grandfather was horribly young to serve in WWI he would be over 130 which has to be some kind of record.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

felipguilera10Jan 30, 2020

HABEMUS PELICULÓN. Película en la cual se interpreta a dos jóvenes soldados británicos una misión prácticamente suicida en la cual tienen que salvar a una compañía británica que está a punto de caer en una trampa de los alemanes. AmbientaciónHABEMUS PELICULÓN. Película en la cual se interpreta a dos jóvenes soldados británicos una misión prácticamente suicida en la cual tienen que salvar a una compañía británica que está a punto de caer en una trampa de los alemanes. Ambientación increíble, banda sonora de 10, los actores lo hacen excelente. Empezamos fuertes el 2020. Ojalá sea un buen año para el cine.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

AsclepiusJan 31, 2020

Something about continuous shot movies I really admire, but this film was particularly good in that I didn't feel it drag. Everyone involved with the production should be proud.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

IAmaMovieGeekApr 29, 2020

Epic war movie with fantastic screenplay and visuals. Please see this film! It deserved it's Oscar award. 9/10

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

GazMoviesOct 16, 2020

Was pretty slow and boring for the most part. I didn't really care for this considering all the hype it got. There a lot of massive name actors in this that only play a small part in the movie. It's one of those films for me that I don'tWas pretty slow and boring for the most part. I didn't really care for this considering all the hype it got. There a lot of massive name actors in this that only play a small part in the movie. It's one of those films for me that I don't think I will be bothering to watch again.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

DimocracyJul 6, 2023

I adore the cinematography in this movie, very talented, just a masterpiece!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

CMCFeb 9, 2020

Typical Hollywood fare, one long video game, overly sentimental manipulative music that does not even manipulate well, a series of contrived shots art-directed to give the cinematography visual opportunities, deeply unsatisfyingTypical Hollywood fare, one long video game, overly sentimental manipulative music that does not even manipulate well, a series of contrived shots art-directed to give the cinematography visual opportunities, deeply unsatisfying underdeveloped characters, lost opportunities for character interactions that could have communicated something deeper, predictable plot. The reviews by the New Yorker, Roger Ebert, New York Times and Los Angeles Times are all spot-on. How could so many other reviewers say those stupid things and award the movie a 100 score? I give it a 6 only because it is more watchable than most movies, but these days that sure is not saying much. Many cite Saying Private Ryan, but that film had much more humanity to it. It does not hold a candle to The Thin Red Line, or possibly more importantly, Paths of Glory.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

donelsonFeb 13, 2020

Truly astonishing filmmaking. The long take woth camera leading then following then side tracking seamlessly, fluidly brings us close to the players in a way that I've never seen before. Roger Deakins is a magician, far beyond a master. SamTruly astonishing filmmaking. The long take woth camera leading then following then side tracking seamlessly, fluidly brings us close to the players in a way that I've never seen before. Roger Deakins is a magician, far beyond a master. Sam Mendes vision is astounding, yet tempered by some truly intimate moments, truly poignant. Especially loved "the miracle of the milk". Oscar worthy in many ways. Must see.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

premium_sauceApr 14, 2020

It’s a shame I was really looking forward to watching this movie. Extremely strong start, great first 40min and then it all went downhill.. the pilot scene for example, why would the German stab Schofield’s friend? Already outnumbered, BritsIt’s a shame I was really looking forward to watching this movie. Extremely strong start, great first 40min and then it all went downhill.. the pilot scene for example, why would the German stab Schofield’s friend? Already outnumbered, Brits showed empathy yet any human being wouldn’t be stupid enough to commit an act that gets you killed but rather opt to get captured. Écoust city plot sealed it off for me, how can the Germans miss so many shots, run behind a guy without even bothering aiming… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JoeCoolFeb 1, 2020

The continouos one shot of the movie is it's main feature. It unfortunately also limits what can be done in storytelling. In a massive action scene it's really a phenomenal achievement, but in rather boring uneventful scenes you as a viewerThe continouos one shot of the movie is it's main feature. It unfortunately also limits what can be done in storytelling. In a massive action scene it's really a phenomenal achievement, but in rather boring uneventful scenes you as a viewer have to walk the distance. The one shot gimmick makes the movie less enjoyable than it could be IMO. Sticking with at least trying to make it look like it was shot in one go does have downsides. If you admire how movies are made you'll probably be extatic about this one. If you're just in it to see a good movie, you might be slightly disappointed. Don't let the hoarde of one-review 10's fool you. This is not a movie you just have to see for anything other than to marvel at the technical one-shot feat. While it is quite the remarkable achievement it's also it's achilles heel.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

mbeckfordOct 17, 2020

An epic visual masterpiece of the often ignored (at least in this generation) horror of World War I.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

gracjanskiMar 29, 2020

Wow, what a movie. I am still excited. After 5 minutes you get the feeling, that this movie is special, because it is a long shot and clever done, where you see more and more of the dugout. After 10 minutes I was asking myself, if they areWow, what a movie. I am still excited. After 5 minutes you get the feeling, that this movie is special, because it is a long shot and clever done, where you see more and more of the dugout. After 10 minutes I was asking myself, if they are crazy, there is still no edit, and still the first shot. When do they end it? After more minutes I was looking where did they hid the edits. But this is not the only genius thing in the movie. The cameraman made a perfect job and shows you only the things, you shall see to get a certain feeling and the moods in the pictures are changing slowly...but still on one shot. Perfect. In addition you are all the time close to the protagonists. What a organisation to do it with so few shots.
And of course the actors. It is so demanding to avoid mistakes for so long and act for so long.
Ok, but there are some few things I didnt like: There were some unrealistic scenes, not only, that the germans could shoot well, but also their behaviour was not realistic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

lager96Jul 15, 2020

1917 hit all the right notes that it needed to make me love it. The first time watching this movie in the theater was a great experience and I went back a week later to watch it again! The movie builds to a climax and then continues and1917 hit all the right notes that it needed to make me love it. The first time watching this movie in the theater was a great experience and I went back a week later to watch it again! The movie builds to a climax and then continues and repeats. The one take feel adds so much to the story and makes you truly feel like you're with the characters. The final 20min is so good and gives me chills every time I watch it. Everything about this movie is great and is my favorite film of 2019.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

VickimageMar 7, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 1917 is a gimmicky disappointment. The one-continuous-take conceit doesn’t work because the film ends up looking like a Call of Duty video game. You never feel any real connection with the two central characters on their dangerous mission. The other issue is that having different set pieces every 20 minutes or so - in which characters are in inevitable peril - feels contrived and undermines the film’s supposed authenticity. A stunt involving a plane has been pinched straight from Hitchcock’s North By Northwest. The first 15 minutes - in which the characters go through no man’s land - is the best in the picture. After that it is downhill.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

naufri27May 24, 2020

Secuencias imponentes y una gran interpretación de su actor principal para narrarnos la misión de un soldado anónimo, pasando por diferentes escenarios del frente.
Se echa en falta algo más de crítica social sobre lo que significó la GranSecuencias imponentes y una gran interpretación de su actor principal para narrarnos la misión de un soldado anónimo, pasando por diferentes escenarios del frente.
Se echa en falta algo más de crítica social sobre lo que significó la Gran Guerra.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

vitortfvDec 16, 2020

The story itself does not bring many surprises and the fact that it continues to be shot in sequence, perhaps has attracted the attention of many. In addition, beautiful photography.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Voodoo123Feb 10, 2020

1917 looks stunning in places, I was really impressed by the 'one shot'style and some very clever 'impossible camera' moments (esp drifting down into the crater!). Overall impressive production value to be seen here. The story was basic yet I1917 looks stunning in places, I was really impressed by the 'one shot'style and some very clever 'impossible camera' moments (esp drifting down into the crater!). Overall impressive production value to be seen here. The story was basic yet I never quite felt connected to any of the characters and I felt the modern film score was inappropriate in places over blowing the more emotional sequences. To get so much so right within an over saturated genre like this is in itself an achievement so there's that. Worth a look IMO.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

mcblancaflorJul 8, 2020

1917 reminds us that film is and will always be an art form. A very simple yet compelling story told in a manner where audience were immersed in a wide open field yet a very claustrophobic feel. The pre-production prep should’ve been so1917 reminds us that film is and will always be an art form. A very simple yet compelling story told in a manner where audience were immersed in a wide open field yet a very claustrophobic feel. The pre-production prep should’ve been so grueling. The blocking was phenomenal. The timing of the shots to make sure the sun is covered by the clouds requires a lot of dedication.

Personally, my favorite part of the film is the deserted city inhabited by the Germans. Deakins is really a master of light. The timing of the flares just to make sure they film the shadows waving through George Mackay is perfect. There is nothing like it. There is nothing like 1917 and we, as viewers, are blessed to have it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

superbatApr 29, 2021

1917 is, in some ways, a mixed bag. From a visual standpoint, the film is a masterpiece. The one-shot technique is executed well. The action scenes are harrowing. The settings in the battlefields are vivid. The film excels at capturing the1917 is, in some ways, a mixed bag. From a visual standpoint, the film is a masterpiece. The one-shot technique is executed well. The action scenes are harrowing. The settings in the battlefields are vivid. The film excels at capturing the brutal and dreadful nature of war. main drawback to this movie is that it focuses on the technical aspects at the expense of a good storyline. The film invests little time in its characters and their backgrounds, as a result of the focus being on the protagonists quest to accomplish their mission. Without that connection to the characters, remaining engaged was difficult. 1917's visuals and technical aspects made it a good war film. However, it falls short of greatness due to a lack of a compelling storyline… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

JP32Mar 25, 2020

To discuss this movie based on its cinematography alone, ignores how stunning the rest of the movie is, and the way every element works together. Forget the "gimmick" talk. 1917 is simply a brilliant, harrowing war film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

eva3si0nJan 4, 2021

1917 great military drama. There is no pseudogeroity and a lot of patriotic speeches. The story is simple and quite real. And while as in Dunkirk the true enemy is not very often shown, the film keeps in tension throughout time. Yeah,1917 great military drama. There is no pseudogeroity and a lot of patriotic speeches. The story is simple and quite real. And while as in Dunkirk the true enemy is not very often shown, the film keeps in tension throughout time. Yeah, operator 's work, it 's better than what 's in the movie. Made just fine, one of the best films of 2019.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

samstylleApr 7, 2020

This movie is one of the most tense and exciting movies I've seen in years. Amazing cinematography and overall amazing experience of a movie.
The best movie ever. Very touching. Deserved the Oscar of direction.
I THOROUGHLY RECOMMEND

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Mitya64Feb 9, 2020

Отличный фильм про двух пацанов. Сьемка просто вау, без склеек монтажа, почти весь фильм. При этом там происходит боевые действия, сменяются локации, люди погибают.Отличный фильм про двух пацанов. Сьемка просто вау, без склеек монтажа, почти весь фильм. При этом там происходит боевые действия, сменяются локации, люди погибают.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DubeauJan 21, 2020

Interesting style for a war movie. It is filmed in one shot sequence (you will know were they cut). The story is more of a journey. Emotions are established in an intimate settings most of the time. The FX are excellent. The acting veryInteresting style for a war movie. It is filmed in one shot sequence (you will know were they cut). The story is more of a journey. Emotions are established in an intimate settings most of the time. The FX are excellent. The acting very sincere. There some tense moments. The dialogues felt true to me. I would have like to know more about the main character. I give it 82%, Nothing bad to say. It's an interesting way to present WW1, not always valid but visually captivating.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews