Read User Reviews and Submit your own for 1917 - Page 2

9

FranzHcriticDec 25, 2019

Director Sam Mendes and the great cinematographer Roger Deakins give us an innovative edition to the war genre, with a one-shot style that has the effect of not only providing a captivating point-of-view of the young soldier, but also inDirector Sam Mendes and the great cinematographer Roger Deakins give us an innovative edition to the war genre, with a one-shot style that has the effect of not only providing a captivating point-of-view of the young soldier, but also in making the Great War seem claustrophobic. The two leads McKay and Chapman each have their breakout role here as two soldiers we follow and identify with throughout their journey, and the cameos of veterans such as Colin Firth and Benedict Cumberbatch elevate the talent of acting in '1917'. Mendes and Deakins are one of the better creative teams in our modern filmmaking. To breathe new life into a dulled genre like war movies takes a true marvel but '1917' is just the film. I was engrossed, and I actually felt as if I was with the young soliders through their whole ordeal.… Expand

8 of 9 users found this helpful81

All this user's reviews

9

LincsJan 10, 2020

1917 was as beautiful as it was gritty. Do not go into this expecting it to be the next Saving Private Ryan. It is a vastly different movie, and that's a good thing. One of the few movie worth your time (and money).

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

eagleeyevikingApr 21, 2020

While the screenplay can feel mawkish, "1917" is still a technically masterful, immersive, and impeccably shot WW1 drama.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Brent_MarchantJan 1, 2020

Despite a somewhat slow beginning, this otherwise-gripping World War I tale, filmed ostensibly as one long continuous shot, takes viewers on a first-person journey through battle-ravaged France as two British soldiers try to warn their fellowDespite a somewhat slow beginning, this otherwise-gripping World War I tale, filmed ostensibly as one long continuous shot, takes viewers on a first-person journey through battle-ravaged France as two British soldiers try to warn their fellow troops about an impending trap set for them by allegedly retreating Germans. By bringing the war to the front row of the theater, audiences get to experience the terror of the conflict up close, a story capable of genuinely frightening viewers better than any of the best horror flicks on the market. The fine lead performances of George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman, combined by the stunning photography of Roger Deakins, the riveting score of Thomas Newman and the expert direction of Sam Mendes, combine to make this truly one of the year's best. The effect may leave you feeling a bit claustrophobic and shell-shocked at times, but then that's a sure sign the filmmakers have done their job.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

9

GeorgemortinJan 11, 2020

Esta película es una obra de arte, y solo con la forma de ser dirigida con esos largos planos secuencia merece ser vista en el cine.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

9

twall3Jan 31, 2020

I gave up trying to figure out how the filmed it to look like the entire film was one continuous camera shot. Loved the courage of the 2 main characters, and the contrast of the young man on the mission vs everyone else who was just goingI gave up trying to figure out how the filmed it to look like the entire film was one continuous camera shot. Loved the courage of the 2 main characters, and the contrast of the young man on the mission vs everyone else who was just going along with war as usual. Wow. Quite a movie.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

9

mcblancaflorJul 8, 2020

1917 reminds us that film is and will always be an art form. A very simple yet compelling story told in a manner where audience were immersed in a wide open field yet a very claustrophobic feel. The pre-production prep should’ve been so1917 reminds us that film is and will always be an art form. A very simple yet compelling story told in a manner where audience were immersed in a wide open field yet a very claustrophobic feel. The pre-production prep should’ve been so grueling. The blocking was phenomenal. The timing of the shots to make sure the sun is covered by the clouds requires a lot of dedication.

Personally, my favorite part of the film is the deserted city inhabited by the Germans. Deakins is really a master of light. The timing of the flares just to make sure they film the shadows waving through George Mackay is perfect. There is nothing like it. There is nothing like 1917 and we, as viewers, are blessed to have it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Kalele005Jan 13, 2020

i don't go watch movie in theater often in fact i don't go at all but i listenened what the director of the movie said it's a movie made to be experienced on a big screen so i did go watch it in theater and he was right, that movie is such ani don't go watch movie in theater often in fact i don't go at all but i listenened what the director of the movie said it's a movie made to be experienced on a big screen so i did go watch it in theater and he was right, that movie is such an emotive experience i'm quite young and can easy relate to the characters,i love both main character and i felt their friendship i just think that dean chapman death felt really early in the story they should have develop the friendship the two character more but life can be inpredictable i think it was the desire to the writer to shock peoples if it was i was really sad about his death,the movie other than that is almost a masterpiece not everyone will agree with me it's a movie to entertain people it did is job, i just think that other countries aren't the ennemy but in that movie they are shown as such it's war peoples were crazy as a human being that movie just shown me a reality that i hope will never be again, let's be wise humankind,that movie was entertaining,hearthbreaking and intense, sam mandes is really a good director and a good human being. I don't regret any second of it, i didn't seen time go by,it's a movie who would deserved a 3hours long experience! =) i hope sam mandes will do other movies with that high quality and emotion drive i'll go more often in cinema watch his work. He deserve the oscar 2020.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

SrPepeJan 24, 2020

1917 es una película excelente, la producción, el sonido, la fotografía, todo es excelente y personalmente me atrapo desde los primeros minutos.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

LoyolaProp1Dec 31, 2019

I don’t know if you’ll find a feature film that more properly captures the carnage left behind by trench warfare. The images are haunting and convey the horror of war more than any movie I can remember. Some complain the story is simple, butI don’t know if you’ll find a feature film that more properly captures the carnage left behind by trench warfare. The images are haunting and convey the horror of war more than any movie I can remember. Some complain the story is simple, but it really doesn’t need to be more complicated. The visuals are masterfully achieved, but I’m not sure the camera technique used was necessary or particularly affective.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

JP32Mar 25, 2020

To discuss this movie based on its cinematography alone, ignores how stunning the rest of the movie is, and the way every element works together. Forget the "gimmick" talk. 1917 is simply a brilliant, harrowing war film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

eva3si0nJan 4, 2021

1917 great military drama. There is no pseudogeroity and a lot of patriotic speeches. The story is simple and quite real. And while as in Dunkirk the true enemy is not very often shown, the film keeps in tension throughout time. Yeah,1917 great military drama. There is no pseudogeroity and a lot of patriotic speeches. The story is simple and quite real. And while as in Dunkirk the true enemy is not very often shown, the film keeps in tension throughout time. Yeah, operator 's work, it 's better than what 's in the movie. Made just fine, one of the best films of 2019.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

KeithDowJan 10, 2020

The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The director, the actor, and the cinematographer. Sam Mendes, George MacKay, and Roger Deakins.

This trinity of artists has achieved something truly special with their World War War I masterpieceThe Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The director, the actor, and the cinematographer. Sam Mendes, George MacKay, and Roger Deakins.

This trinity of artists has achieved something truly special with their World War War I masterpiece ‘1917.’ There are good movies. There are great movies. And every so often—perhaps once a year at most, if we the audience may be so spoiled—there are movies that advance the art form beyond its present state, towards a loftier plane of existence. ‘1917’ is indeed one of these movies.

Upon seeing the film, words feel trivial in trying to characterize or describe in any meaningful way the experience that this movie provides. Give director Sam Mendes a pen and a camera and there isn’t anything he can’t do. Afford him the privilege of working with lead actor George MacKay and sublimity follows. Pair them both with legendary cinematographer Roger Deakins and transcendence awaits.

The “single take” effect in which the film is presented is not new. Others have also done it to great acclaim, such as Alejandro G. Inarritu with ‘Birdman’ or Ilya Naishuller with ‘Hardcore Henry.’ But no other film has done it better than ‘1917’ and quite frankly there are few, if any films in recent memory, that have been so thoroughly exceptional in every other facet of the filmmaking process.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

Mitya64Feb 9, 2020

Отличный фильм про двух пацанов. Сьемка просто вау, без склеек монтажа, почти весь фильм. При этом там происходит боевые действия, сменяются локации, люди погибают.Отличный фильм про двух пацанов. Сьемка просто вау, без склеек монтажа, почти весь фильм. При этом там происходит боевые действия, сменяются локации, люди погибают.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

SquaredRenJan 19, 2020

This movie is a masterpiece, the plot is pretty simple. But the cinematography, film editing, and acting is this film is top quality. The single-shot illusion makes the viewer feel things more personal, given the fact that the viewer isThis movie is a masterpiece, the plot is pretty simple. But the cinematography, film editing, and acting is this film is top quality. The single-shot illusion makes the viewer feel things more personal, given the fact that the viewer is pretty much travelling with the protagonist. Highly recommended.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

fifi3Jan 16, 2020

Between the magnificent one-shot cinematography, the twist and turns and extraordinary acting, this is one of the most complete war films in recent memory and certainly amongst the best films of 2019.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

estonismJan 12, 2020

The camera work was stunning, the acting was excellent. Aside from some obligatory, non-essential scenes, this was an enjoyable movie. Some sequences were really edge of your seat and amazing in their ability to draw you into the movie.The camera work was stunning, the acting was excellent. Aside from some obligatory, non-essential scenes, this was an enjoyable movie. Some sequences were really edge of your seat and amazing in their ability to draw you into the movie. Others seemed like a short-cut was taken to piece the movie story-line together. A must see on the big screen with Dolby Sound for a fully immersive experience. 10/10 for me cinematography, but overall a 9/10.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

JagzzFeb 10, 2020

There are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the warThere are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the war itself, some things never seem to change.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MallRat15Jan 31, 2020

This movie is so beautifully shot, with a crazy attention to detail. The score also plays with the movie very well. Movie flows so well it keeps your eyes locked to the screen the entire time. A very simple story but paced well and shot soThis movie is so beautifully shot, with a crazy attention to detail. The score also plays with the movie very well. Movie flows so well it keeps your eyes locked to the screen the entire time. A very simple story but paced well and shot so well turns it into one of the years best movies. Going to win many awards this awards season and maybe even take home best picture of the year.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

jaredwallace91Jan 10, 2020

Beautiful cinematography and a reminder of what consequences we face when our leaders play dangerous war games. Hopefully the War to End All Wars can give us the urgency to end our Endless Wars.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

KuggzMar 15, 2020

The first 30 mins is one story and one that might turn people off but the movie takes off and becomes a classic. Fans of The Revenant and Apocalypse Now should see this immediately.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

CharlieSGJan 28, 2020

The simple story made this all together a great movie. The acting was just there, very good by all the characters, but the cinematic pulling together of the tale made it well worth watching. Could be well enjoyed on a small screen but inThe simple story made this all together a great movie. The acting was just there, very good by all the characters, but the cinematic pulling together of the tale made it well worth watching. Could be well enjoyed on a small screen but in the theater really makes to grand.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

d0vla11Jan 10, 2020

What a great war movie. Cinematography and acting were phenomenal, also the score blown me away.

Definitely in top 5 war movies ever.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

SoulWarfareFeb 27, 2020

People call this film "The Birdman of WWI" and to be fair that is a justified assessment. This entire film is filmed like it is one camera shot and it is AWESOME! think one of the most impressive thing apart from the one looking shot is thePeople call this film "The Birdman of WWI" and to be fair that is a justified assessment. This entire film is filmed like it is one camera shot and it is AWESOME! think one of the most impressive thing apart from the one looking shot is the AMAZING CINEMATOGRAPHY. This shouldn’t be no surprising since it is the legend himself Roger Deakins (Blade Runner 2049 Cinematographer). Every scene feels like a painting and it is absolutely stunning. There is a scene at night where the lighting was done in such a creative way that heighten the tension of the scene. On that note there must also be praise for the score by Thomas Newman who somehow manages to make a score that somehow manages toe elevate every scene and help tell the story. There is also some amazing sound design that manages to make the War actually scary with moments that give horror movie jump scares a run for its money. Additionally, the props and set design should also get praise for creating such large,realistic but elaborate sets to accommodate for a more natural one shot scene. Everything in this film just feels like a technical achievement. We haven’t even touched on the acting or story yet but just for the way this was filmed is already engaging enough. Nevertheless, the two main actors George MacKay as Lance Corporal William "Will" Schofield and Dean-Charles Chapma as Lance Corporal Thomas "Tom" Blake manages to do a phenomenal job in showing the horror of war and giving authentic,believable characters. The story, while relatively simple, is engaging enough to keep you invested in the objective of the main characters. They must send a message to allies stop them running into a trap. It’s simple but works well for the aim of one shot as now it makes the audience a part of the journey.

There isn’t much negative to this movie but I guess if I have to be quite nitpicky it is the fact that halfway through the movie there is a obvious cut. So this movie is actually really a two shot film. The cut was necessary to make the situation more desperate and allow for a unique change in scenery even though it was a bit of a jarring cut. Another sort of nitpick is that we don’t really get much info on the main characters. We get their names and we know what their mission is but their backstory is just given in tidbits. It goes in a Dunkirk route in which we care about these characters because of the situation they are in rather than the fact that we are invested in the characters. It can be argued that the tidbits more than gives you enough info about the characters but it’s really up to the audience in the end. Personally, I don’t find it too much of a fault but can see how others could consider it so.

Honestly my negatives are just nitpicks. This movie is amazing and it is definitely worth watching right now.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Harsh657Jan 19, 2020

1917 is a film that takes you on a journey that you won't forget your entire life. You will feel like you are with these 2 characters and you will every every emotion they feel. It feels like a one continuous shot and it is done with such1917 is a film that takes you on a journey that you won't forget your entire life. You will feel like you are with these 2 characters and you will every every emotion they feel. It feels like a one continuous shot and it is done with such perfection that you won't even notice if there was as cut.
Cinematography is outstanding and I think this time Roger Deakins will win an oscar.
The thing that can bother you is that it feels like a video-game. Also there are no emotional backstory given to the characters which is the only think that I have an issue with.
It is a must watch in theatre and I think everyone should experience this in theatres.
Grade: A-… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

LivingTribunalSep 10, 2020

There isn’t any unnecessary shot in this…, no I’ll have to say this is a perfect masterpiece without having any unnecessary 1/1000 shot.

spoiler below: ----------------------------------------- First of all, Roger Deakins has accomplishedThere isn’t any unnecessary shot in this…, no I’ll have to say this is a perfect masterpiece without having any unnecessary 1/1000 shot.

spoiler below:
-----------------------------------------

First of all, Roger Deakins has accomplished absolutely transcendent work using the one-take technique. But I often see that not many people recognize the movie’s well-organized plot. Schofield is a soldier who doesn’t have any certain direction of life just like many other soldiers. He's just tired of long-lasting war. I think his journey can also be considered as a journey of asking. He has to ask people to get to Colonel MacKenzie because the map is useless for him. The plot is very well designed in a symmetrical way. In the end, he runs along the trench line, not toward the enemy, and finally finds out that his way should be home.

p.s.
-"I'm only going over Jordan, I'm only going over home"
- When Blake died two soldiers appear to Schofield. One was short and little fat, and the other was tall and skinny just like Blake and Schofield. This scene shows that this film is really about ordinary soldiers.
-Unlike World War II, World War 1 didn't have any specific bad guy like Hitler, it was just a difference of ideology. This is why 1917 is different from all other war movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Marlock101Jul 31, 2020

This movie is a near-perfect representation of the gritty and dark reality of World War 1. This perfectly encapsulated the scale and gravity of the war. The protagonist is likable, and the characters are portrayed well (in terms of WW1This movie is a near-perfect representation of the gritty and dark reality of World War 1. This perfectly encapsulated the scale and gravity of the war. The protagonist is likable, and the characters are portrayed well (in terms of WW1 soldiers). Overall very emotional, well made, very impressive on a cinematographical level, and amazingly believable and immersive.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BulgarianCriticFeb 2, 2020

This movie for me is one of the most beautifully shot films ever made. Every scene was aesthetically pleasing and surrounded with beauty and despair. Every time they went into trenches you could see and feel the paranoia and claustrophobiaThis movie for me is one of the most beautifully shot films ever made. Every scene was aesthetically pleasing and surrounded with beauty and despair. Every time they went into trenches you could see and feel the paranoia and claustrophobia just from the way it was filmed. The movie also keeps you constantly on your toes by relaxing you in a scene and beauty and then something tragic or intense happens. The cinematography and music was amazing and the story was beautiful.I suggest for every movie watcher to check this film even if you are not a fan of this genre.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

ahmedaiman1999Feb 3, 2020

I won't say anything about how immersive and impressive on a technical level this gritty yet moving film is; I just want to say that I can't remember the last time I identified with and was emotionally invested in a character in a war film asI won't say anything about how immersive and impressive on a technical level this gritty yet moving film is; I just want to say that I can't remember the last time I identified with and was emotionally invested in a character in a war film as I did with George MacKay's William Schofield. What a talent! (9/10)… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

djbattJan 12, 2020

Wow Great editing.. the feel of one (take) continues filming was different and nice

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

MurphyBrandonDec 31, 2019

1917 has a constant nervous tension that will grip your attention and refuse to let go. I think it must be mentioned among the best World War I films from now on. Aesthetically, the cinematography will remind people of Dunkirk, plus they1917 has a constant nervous tension that will grip your attention and refuse to let go. I think it must be mentioned among the best World War I films from now on. Aesthetically, the cinematography will remind people of Dunkirk, plus they blended long clips together to make it look continuous. In my opinion, that core concept does not cause pacing issues. The story keeps up at a decent pace and rarely lingers too long. With one main goal in mind, the plot is powerful and easy to follow.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

Iann22Apr 5, 2020

Please not another WW2 drama! But while watching this movie I was glued to my seat. Main characters are interesting, relatable and captivating. Was really a pleasant surprise.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

BrunoVn00Jan 22, 2020

This movie isn't about the characters or the story...This movie is an experience. Really if you think about the characters, they are pretty weak and underdeveloped, but at least the performances of the main actors are pretty good. The storyThis movie isn't about the characters or the story...This movie is an experience. Really if you think about the characters, they are pretty weak and underdeveloped, but at least the performances of the main actors are pretty good. The story is pretty straight-forward get to point A to point B and there isn't anything too special to it, but, like I said, this is more about the experience. This movie achieves to make the viewer feel part of the war, which I think that was the intention of the one-continuous take "gimmick" (which it isn't). This movie is called 1917 instead of "The Adventure of blue-eyed blond Soldier" (that's why the characters are forgettable, I can't remember their names) because the long take is what adds to the experience. Sure, the long take isn't obviously anything new and movies like Birdman (I know, they are completely different genres) make it better, but for this movie it works. Some moments feel slow and all but, again, it adds to the whole point of feeling part of the war. The sound design and the cinematography are great and the score, while sometimes it sounds like generic stock music, sometimes it sounds amazing. Overall, this movie is more about the experience than the characters or plot. I recommend it because is still a pretty good movie. I don't think it's a masterpiece or the best of the year but it is certainly a really well done film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

zNeverSleepingFeb 8, 2020

Esse é um dos filmes que te deixam com uma interrogação na cabeça, mas não relacionada a trama, e sim a técnica.

Impressionante. O trabalho e dedicação do Sam Mendes aqui é notável. Todo o filme estava friamente conectado. A direção faz comEsse é um dos filmes que te deixam com uma interrogação na cabeça, mas não relacionada a trama, e sim a técnica.

Impressionante. O trabalho e dedicação do Sam Mendes aqui é notável. Todo o filme estava friamente conectado. A direção faz com que a cinematografia tenha um controle total de como tudo ocorre, como se fossemos um hospedeiro e/ou todo cenário fosse uma esteira, e falando nisso, que cenografia absurda - que contribui e muito para a atmosfera. E aqui vem uma curiosidade: como foi possível planos tão longos? É como se o cenário não acabasse mais.

O roteiro tem seus méritos. Sabe bem como familiarizar o publico com historias ou alívios cômicos - bem no inicio do filme; também consegue nos fazer ficar vidrado num gênero que já se tornou maçante há um tempo - quando não aproveitado da maneira correta; e traz justamente a possibilidade de fazer um filme com pouquíssimos cortes, se assemelhando a um plano sequencia por completo. E por ultimo, devo apenas mencionar o plano sequencia que ocorre próximo ao final do filme, que é simplesmente maestral e emocionante. Ver isso num Imax faz toda a diferença!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

clem666Mar 18, 2023

Outstanding artwork. A poetic and intense story about friendship, family, death, boldness and abnegation in the context of war. The movie really shines in my opinion for its ability to give precise proportion of time to storytelling, silence,Outstanding artwork. A poetic and intense story about friendship, family, death, boldness and abnegation in the context of war. The movie really shines in my opinion for its ability to give precise proportion of time to storytelling, silence, roaring fear, moments of comradeship and plain jokes.
Terrific acting performances for both George MacKay (playing as Scholfield) and Dean-Charles Chapman (as Blake). Their interactions embellish their respective roles and manage to craft a touching bond.
Amazing work from Sam Mendes and his team for the shooting, the colours, the sound-design, the editing and the overall atmosphere. Thank you too, Thomas Newman, for this notable soundtrack. '1917' is not a film with many plots and sub-plots, in fact it doesn't tell much of anything, but it does take us into a very dark moment in the history of mankind in our modern and contemporary times. It's more a movie to live than to watch. The film clearly lacks a 'must-see' label.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

vusal_iskandarMar 24, 2020

A deadly drama. Breathtaking war film. I dont know who was the director, but they depicted 1st world war very well. There were 2-3second moments in the film which it can take you to think about it for 3-4hours, there were 2-3 seconds momentsA deadly drama. Breathtaking war film. I dont know who was the director, but they depicted 1st world war very well. There were 2-3second moments in the film which it can take you to think about it for 3-4hours, there were 2-3 seconds moments in the film that you can dive into it and stay here for 3-4 hours.. Yeah really deserved to take time and watch it !!… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

Bcap1415Jan 11, 2020

Great movie. Best picture? Not sure, haven't seen them all yet, however I feel Joker is a movie that sticks with you, and 1917 is a great movie but one I don't feel I'll remember all that much in a few years.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

DiptanshuFeb 19, 2020

Wow!That ending was heart warming,literally from starting each and every moment was engaging but after sometime pacing was somewhat disturbed but tension and gripping was to the point great score,cinematography and good acting performances asWow!That ending was heart warming,literally from starting each and every moment was engaging but after sometime pacing was somewhat disturbed but tension and gripping was to the point great score,cinematography and good acting performances as well cameos were great!at last a good movie with crazy camera shots especially felt we are living in it!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

tarekaliJun 16, 2022

This movie is a love letter to old-school storytelling and cinematography in particular. From the opening shot to the final cut, there was only one single absolutely justified disruption in the viewpoint of the audience. End to end, thisThis movie is a love letter to old-school storytelling and cinematography in particular. From the opening shot to the final cut, there was only one single absolutely justified disruption in the viewpoint of the audience. End to end, this brutal mission was a singular journey through blasted hell scapes, lush meadows, dark caverns, and erupting fields of fire. It is truly a master class in filmmaking to seamlessly tell a story in a single cut. The mission itself is the point, where the will to live and save lives, to sacrifice for the greater good, can infect even the most nonchalant of protagonists. In turn, such sacrifice can lead to inner peace and resolution of old hurts. There are moments of utter terror where our heroes are running for their lives and complete peace where they take a moment to enjoy the miracle of life itself. But all in all, this is one unforgettable war story, told in a single sweeping vision.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

BeardedYodaJan 21, 2020

1917 is one of the best war films I have seen in a long time and the minor flaws in it don't hold back the film much at all. You have to see it.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

DMLYxCriticJan 23, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Gritty, violent, emotional and cathartic. These are the words that comes into mind after watching Sam Mendes' World War I take, 1917. Unlike any other war movies of late, this film seems to take on a fresher approach with its "one shot" cinematography, although it became quite problematic in the long run as the audiences get frustrated, wanting to see the whole thing. It also affected the editing, as some scenes that were supposedly essential are sacrificed for the singular shot cinematography. But it also has its perks, though, as it made the film much more grittier. Overall, this film is a wild ride into the horrors of the first World War, something that isn't quite tackled in any other war films.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Hwinter07Jan 16, 2020

Best movie of the year in my opinion. Excellent cinematography and score coupled with the spectacular "long shot" style of filming.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

RaventhornJan 17, 2020

From the moment the movie begins to the end, the movie shows you the horrors of World War 1 and keeps you in suspense as to what will happen to the men and the mission. Great pace and suspense!

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

ChrisM1979Jan 20, 2020

As just a movie maybe it wasn't a 10 but for people interested in film making this was a masterpiece. As a movie alone I will give it an 8 but for what it achieved from a film making perspective a 10 so overall I'd give it a 9.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

BatMiteJan 9, 2020

An intense and perilous journey seen through the eyes of two young soldiers that are tossed into this mission: stopping their fellow British troops from advancing and falling into a ambush. The film follows what seems to be two young andAn intense and perilous journey seen through the eyes of two young soldiers that are tossed into this mission: stopping their fellow British troops from advancing and falling into a ambush. The film follows what seems to be two young and fairly inexperienced troops as they fight the elements and their own fears through foreign land to save their fellow soldiers from a trap from the opposing forces. The story has its moments of intense, stressful situations weaved with some time to let the audience breathe a sigh of relief, if only for a second or two. The visuals are what keep the performances and the writing tied together. There are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the war itself, some things never seem to change.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

9

FerreAndradeJan 25, 2020

Beautifully crafted film. Editing was seamless. And felt as if In one shot it was filmed. Stunning

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

v1ntageJan 12, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. To be honest, I went into this movie thinking it would be some Hollywood blockbuster spun on a WWI theme. I was quite wrong and was moved on this master piece of adventure and suspense. The personal connection of director Sam Mendes helps form the on-edge story of two men set out on a journey to deliver an order to call off a predetermined attack. One of the best films of the year.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

MaksCoolJan 14, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 9 из-за пары недочётов и фейл моментов. Но оно очень классное и великое и передоёт весь ужас войны… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

DonChristopherJan 20, 2020

Holy Cow, this movie was fantastic – my heart was really pounding and I felt transported into the action!

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Jcummings2Jan 18, 2020

One of the most beautifully shot war movies I have ever seen. Nice story, very good acting. Great film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MaciejkamilJan 25, 2020

It's a great movie, since not only does it show that being humane during the war will be used by the enemy, but it also shows the enemy who is a real threat, not a stormtrooper.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

THCJan 26, 2020

1917 offers a World War One true story epic, featuring events that are almost realistic and historical. 1917 gives viewers an opportunity to feel and see just what it was like during the First World War, making it truly inspiring.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

fiftywordreviewJan 30, 2020

Sam Mendes takes a simple story and turns it into a technically stunning cinematic masterpiece. Likable leads, gripping action, and unrivaled cinematography come together for a movie-going experience unlike any other, and one of the best warSam Mendes takes a simple story and turns it into a technically stunning cinematic masterpiece. Likable leads, gripping action, and unrivaled cinematography come together for a movie-going experience unlike any other, and one of the best war films of our generation.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

felipguilera10Jan 30, 2020

HABEMUS PELICULÓN. Película en la cual se interpreta a dos jóvenes soldados británicos una misión prácticamente suicida en la cual tienen que salvar a una compañía británica que está a punto de caer en una trampa de los alemanes. AmbientaciónHABEMUS PELICULÓN. Película en la cual se interpreta a dos jóvenes soldados británicos una misión prácticamente suicida en la cual tienen que salvar a una compañía británica que está a punto de caer en una trampa de los alemanes. Ambientación increíble, banda sonora de 10, los actores lo hacen excelente. Empezamos fuertes el 2020. Ojalá sea un buen año para el cine.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

niemaddFeb 1, 2020

1. This movie should definetly be seen.
2. This movie should definetly be seen at cinema.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

brunodecFeb 2, 2020

A must-watch movie. 1917 is not just another war movie with explosions and gunfights: it's a masterpiece. The directing and acting is superb! Emotionally intense and really brings out the unexpected.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

BRJacobsFeb 10, 2020

What a great film, this is an intense, heartbreaking, thrill ride of a movie from beginning to end. This is how you put the audience on the edge of their seats. Does a fantastic job of making us feel the times as they are. The characters areWhat a great film, this is an intense, heartbreaking, thrill ride of a movie from beginning to end. This is how you put the audience on the edge of their seats. Does a fantastic job of making us feel the times as they are. The characters are fun, active, and relatable. Color pallet and cinematography are all great to establish tone and message. Some scenes are profoundly unnerving in a good way. Worth everyone's time to see a glimpse of history.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

eutohiusFeb 12, 2020

This movie is definitely a must-see. Dickins' work is as stunning as always. A pure pleasure to an eye.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

RobwinzApr 19, 2020

An amazing war movie, which shows the struggles and dangers on what it was like in WW1. Also, this movie does something amazing and that's by making the clips they've got from this movie and making it look like it's been shot in one clip,An amazing war movie, which shows the struggles and dangers on what it was like in WW1. Also, this movie does something amazing and that's by making the clips they've got from this movie and making it look like it's been shot in one clip, it's pretty outstanding.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

loremApr 1, 2020

A great movie, impeccably shot, managing to captivate you and make you feel that you are part of the action of the movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

FreddoFazbeardoMay 11, 2020

I thought it was a very good movie, the suspense and everything else, it was very well controlled and it's also fun.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

IAmaMovieGeekApr 29, 2020

Epic war movie with fantastic screenplay and visuals. Please see this film! It deserved it's Oscar award. 9/10

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

TowballNov 3, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Now, before I begin this review, I just want to say some things I didn’t like about this film. I found that the dialogue was a little stiff at some point, and didn’t really feel genuine. As a result, I found myself not being able to form much of a connect with the characters of the film. But ultimately, I have not been able to stop thinking about this film since I had watched it. This movie is a masterpiece, in pretty much every form. The whole movie is made to look like it is one long take, and some of the transitions of the film are truly seamless. They did a really good job of not making the camera feel restricted, and instead chose to push the cinematography of each scene, which really impressed me. My main concern coming into this movie was that the narrative structure would fall short, mainly because of the fact that they would not be able to cut between scene. However, I was pleased to say that I was proven wrong. The writing for this film is fantastic. Each scene never feels slow or dragged out, but instead holds a consistent level of tension, making the audience feel like the characters are constantly in danger, because ultimately, they are.
I would also like to make note that the set design for this film are some of the best I have ever seen. Each scene is composed of visually breathtaking set locations, which are dripping with atmosphere. My favourite scene of the whole movie is the scene where the protagonist is running through a destroyed town at night, where the only source of light is flares being shot up into the sky, casing shifting shadows across the whole location. It look absolutely amazing, and I was left speechless after watching that scene, and that is the kind of experience that the film provides for the viewer.
The movie is truly breathtaking in almost every aspect. I cannot recommend this movie enough, as it was such a privilege for myself to watch and enjoy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Dan_BDec 13, 2020

It runs 1917 on the French front. Two British Army corporals, William Schofield and Tom Blake (George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman, respectively) are sent to carry a note to stop the offensive of another English battalion on German linesIt runs 1917 on the French front. Two British Army corporals, William Schofield and Tom Blake (George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman, respectively) are sent to carry a note to stop the offensive of another English battalion on German lines that he believes are in retreat, when in fact the Germans fell back there to ambush him. A true suicide mission, stimulated however by the incentive of Blake's reunion with his brother in that battalion.

1917 is an astonishing immersive experience in the horrors of the trench warfare of World War I, filmed in a (almost) shot sequence that accompanies the protagonists at all times, so the film takes place practically in real time. At certain times, the warlike character gives way practically to horror movies. The anecdote, then, is minimal, as well as the characters. The power of images, sound and music (by Thomas Newman) is prodigious. Roger Deakins' photography (multi-award winning, as well as the film in general) is beautiful and his twists are fundamental in creating the different climates of the film. There is a nocturnal sequence that is simply anthological because of its tension, its aesthetics and the variety of feelings and sensations that it brings into play and produces.

Some critics have objected to this film by the eclectic Sam Mendes two central aspects that in my opinion are virtues. One of them is that the adventures of the protagonists and the sequence shot in motion resemble the perception of the film to the experience of a video game. And will it not be the other way around? Video games simply don't reflect the experience of war and especially now with its remote and virtual control aspects? The First War was a labyrinthine trench warfare.

The other criticism is the lack of "personal history" of the protagonists, which would take away psychological depth. 1917 in this sense resembles Dunkirk: it addresses its characters in media res, that is, in the middle of the battle front. Well, I must say that this "lack" and the simplicity of their motivations places the protagonists in the shoes of true "anonymous soldiers."

1917 is one of those films that one regrets not having seen in the cinema, a cinematographic display with capital letters at the service of a war story where despair and duty go hand in hand.Astonishing immersive experience in the horrors of the trench warfare of World War… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

iCampoRamilNov 16, 2021

Un peliculón de inicio a final. Una manera de hacer cine sensacional, me encanta.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

AJ_13Jan 11, 2021

Great war film. Definitely filming it in a long take was a great decision and makes it a really immersive movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

leandroo17Jan 30, 2023

fanstatic film,the best of its kind I ever watched,immersive camera plan,good characters and the environments are some of the strengths of this work of art

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

saplignFeb 2, 2023

cool‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎cool‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Salvatore506Jul 28, 2023

Muy buena pelicula, te deja ver como era la vida en la primera guerra mundial muy recomendable, de lo mejorcito de prime video 9/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

zrsafarJun 22, 2023

I've never been so impressed by a film's cinematography ever in my life. Fantastic movie

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryJan 10, 2020

During World War I, two young British soldiers are assigned to cross enemy lines and deliver a message that will keep 1600 of their troops from being ambushed. While the mission seems virtually impossible, it's rendered even more incredibleDuring World War I, two young British soldiers are assigned to cross enemy lines and deliver a message that will keep 1600 of their troops from being ambushed. While the mission seems virtually impossible, it's rendered even more incredible by director Sam Mendes' decision to shoot the film as if it were one continuous shot. Not only does this lend an urgency to the journey, but it boggles the mind to consider how some of the scenes were even staged/captured. The trek itself is full of setbacks that make the mission even more challenging for the soldiers and the viewer (if not a bit strained on credibility). Even though there is a continuous level of stress, the drama never has the poignant power that the story demands. As a result, this is a masterful piece of filmmaking that's impact is more technical than emotional.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

DukeJonFeb 7, 2020

A powerful and moving war film showing the folly and futility of war. A few gripes I would have though; the distances and time required to get everywhere seems to have been shorted to move the film along, so from their starting point throughA powerful and moving war film showing the folly and futility of war. A few gripes I would have though; the distances and time required to get everywhere seems to have been shorted to move the film along, so from their starting point through the trench through no mans land through a German bunker to the German rear artillery positions takes no more than half an hour. Not quite enough mud and destruction everywhere either, the landscape would have been almost lunar in its desolation. Other than that a gripping and interesting film.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

moviemitch96Jan 11, 2020

A jaw-dropping and undeniably impressive achievement! This film is set in the midst of World War I in France, and follows two young British soldiers tasked with hand-delivering a message to their 2nd battalion that warns them to call off aA jaw-dropping and undeniably impressive achievement! This film is set in the midst of World War I in France, and follows two young British soldiers tasked with hand-delivering a message to their 2nd battalion that warns them to call off a planned attack that will lure them into an ambush set by the Germans. First off, what truly makes this film stand out is the nifty cinematography technique it employs. The film is 2 hours long, and it's filmed and edited to appear like one long continuous 2-hour shot (not unlike the best picture Oscar-winning film 'Birdman' from 5 years ago.) We literally follow these two young soldiers in real time from start to finish, with no cuts in between, adding to the film an even bigger sense of realism. But even setting aside this impressive technique, the cinematography is absolutely gorgeous, and if this film deserves an Oscar for anything, it's the impeccable camerawork! Other great highlights of the film include its majestic musical score, as well as the acting from the two young soldiers, who make you feel like you're right in the middle of war with them with their realistic fear and performances. There were a couple of moments and stretches where the pacing slows down a bit much, but the one-take appearance does a solid job of making up for this and helped me stay fixated and invested in everything happening, and there was definitely a fair share of tense moments throughout too. Overall, it's undoubtedly a grand and truly unique war film, and one of the most harrowing and memorable ones I've seen in quite some time.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

radixlecti84Jan 19, 2020

Pheonominally shot war epic, though the events that take place are a little larger than life the manner in which the tale is presented really draws you in, the movie is shot as if it is one long nightmare rarely stopping for you to take aPheonominally shot war epic, though the events that take place are a little larger than life the manner in which the tale is presented really draws you in, the movie is shot as if it is one long nightmare rarely stopping for you to take a breath. Defintely see this in your local cinema.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Gods_Son23Jan 18, 2020

"There is no sense of real danger, because the mission has to continue, if only to keep this impressive long shot going..." I won't be clicking on a The Atlantic or a David Sims link again. SPOILER. One of the two soldiers on the mission"There is no sense of real danger, because the mission has to continue, if only to keep this impressive long shot going..." I won't be clicking on a The Atlantic or a David Sims link again. SPOILER. One of the two soldiers on the mission die... How can you say there is no sense of danger. The other one nearly dies numerous times. Some critics are as dumb as a box of hammers.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

condythugFeb 1, 2020

excellent ww1 movie; nicely shot without gratuitous blood and gore. actors are generally ok although it might be an even better movie if it had top quality actors to bring out the characters.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

moviecritic68Jan 15, 2020

A worthwhile film to attend but hardly worthy of a Best Picture award. Great prop scenes & photography but basically the story is a repeat of Saving Private Ryan only in a hard to understand at times British dialogue. I'll score it at 7.8 forA worthwhile film to attend but hardly worthy of a Best Picture award. Great prop scenes & photography but basically the story is a repeat of Saving Private Ryan only in a hard to understand at times British dialogue. I'll score it at 7.8 for those who follow me.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

RalfbergsJan 19, 2020

While the story in the movie is not the most interesting I would have ever seen, the cinematography is so great in this one as it is all made to be like one shot so just for that it is already worth watching. If not that, probably movieWhile the story in the movie is not the most interesting I would have ever seen, the cinematography is so great in this one as it is all made to be like one shot so just for that it is already worth watching. If not that, probably movie itself would get a bit lower score.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

DubeauJan 21, 2020

Interesting style for a war movie. It is filmed in one shot sequence (you will know were they cut). The story is more of a journey. Emotions are established in an intimate settings most of the time. The FX are excellent. The acting veryInteresting style for a war movie. It is filmed in one shot sequence (you will know were they cut). The story is more of a journey. Emotions are established in an intimate settings most of the time. The FX are excellent. The acting very sincere. There some tense moments. The dialogues felt true to me. I would have like to know more about the main character. I give it 82%, Nothing bad to say. It's an interesting way to present WW1, not always valid but visually captivating.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SebkApr 23, 2020

1917 is a movie with an excellent visual representation and a good but predictable story from one specific point of the film. Besides, the movie some absurds moments that makes you feel out of the atmosphere. However, the movie has strong1917 is a movie with an excellent visual representation and a good but predictable story from one specific point of the film. Besides, the movie some absurds moments that makes you feel out of the atmosphere. However, the movie has strong points in relation to the very good performance of the actors, the use of sequence shot, and the visual representation that involves you in this good and warlike film.

--8/10--… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JLuis_001Jan 18, 2020

Finally yesterday I was able to experience 1917 and I ended up doing it at IMAX, something I didn't plan on, but after seeing it there, I can say this film deserves to be seen and heard in an IMAX room to remember why movies still need to beFinally yesterday I was able to experience 1917 and I ended up doing it at IMAX, something I didn't plan on, but after seeing it there, I can say this film deserves to be seen and heard in an IMAX room to remember why movies still need to be lived on a big screen.

The visual odyssey of Sam Mendes and Roger Deakins is an incredible journey. Yes, the story is very thin but that's something that made 1917 a somewhat different film
It's not a war epic, nor does it try to be one. It's kind of a lone wolf war story, though at the beginning it wasn't like that, and that's good because despite everything that happens, the film doesn't lose that sense of camaraderie at the task that remains after the loss.

1917 is a story of survival and that although it could not be considered completely original, that's totally the least of its problems because after all the experience is just spectacular.

I admit the film has certain rhythm dropouts that I didn't like, especially the scene where Schofield loses consciousness, but at that point we are given the extraordinary night sequence, so my discomfort ended up disappearing.

1917 is not a perfect film, but it's a reminder of how wonderful is to enjoy a film as they should be, even if it's a film that deals with the horrors of war.

This is the kind of film that should be lived and experienced that way, otherwise it loses its resonance, so if you have the chance to see 1917 at a big screen do it.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

blassterJan 21, 2020

the technical aspects in this movie are perfect, the long scenes in one shot are great, the cinematography looks beautiful, the music is something very different from any other war movie, maybe because it doesn't really focus on war but onthe technical aspects in this movie are perfect, the long scenes in one shot are great, the cinematography looks beautiful, the music is something very different from any other war movie, maybe because it doesn't really focus on war but on the camaraderie of the characters and the determination with which they act, feels some tension in not knowing what awaits them. It has a sequence in which we can't see where the shots come from that reminds of a video game like Metal Gear Solid thanks to the camera angles and the music that indicates that there is danger. On the negative side, it's a topic that has already been very explored although with a new vision and some scenes feels like a choreography in which the camera simply follows them down a long corridor full of extras.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Bertaut1Jan 22, 2020

Although partly a technical showcase rather than a story, it's still a terrific Great War movie

Written by Sam Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns, and directed by Mendes, unless you've been living under a rock, you'll know that 1917 has beenAlthough partly a technical showcase rather than a story, it's still a terrific Great War movie

Written by Sam Mendes and Krysty Wilson-Cairns, and directed by Mendes, unless you've been living under a rock, you'll know that 1917 has been done in such a way as to give the impression that it all takes place in two shots (the marketing material says one, but it's two – there's a time-jump where no attempt is made to hide the transition). In reality, there are a lot more than two shots, but the edits have been digitally 'hidden', much like Birdman (2014) or Utøya 22. Juli (2018). And although I have some issues with it, I think Mendes has made an exceptional film, one in which form and content are tightly matched, with the style effectively delivering the story in a thematically justified manner.

April 6, 1917; the Western Front. German forces have fallen back, and a pursuing British colonel believes that if he attacks now, he can turn the tide of the war. However, he's unaware that the Germans have fallen back to the heavily fortified Hindenburg Line and are lying in wait. With communication lines cut, two British Lance Corporals, Will Schofield (George MacKay) and Tom Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) are assigned to physically carry an order calling off the following morning's attack. If they fail, 1,600 soldiers will be slaughtered.

So, the film's big selling point is its aesthetic design. The use of the single-shot format is such a noticeable type of form that whenever it's used, it automatically places pressure on the content, which must justify why the film is shot this way, or the form becomes gimmicky. Think of Rope (1948) which was edited to look like one shot, or Victoria (2015), which was legitimately one shot. Very little in either film justifies the stylistic design. Compare this with one-shot films such as Russkij Kovcheg (2002) or the aforementioned Utøya 22. Juli, both of which tie form to content. And I think Mendes and cinematographer Roger Deakins achieve like synergy.

Is the one-shot effect distracting? At first, yes, it is a little, especially if you're trying to spot where editor Lee Smith has hidden the transitions. But after sussing two edits in the first twenty minutes, I stopped looking, because I was just pulling myself out of the film unnecessarily. In essence, once you go with the aesthetic on its own terms, you forget about trying to spot the edits, instead letting the cinematography do exactly what it's supposed to do – immerse you.

The opening scene is a superb introduction to the technique. The film starts with a shot of a daffodil field, before pulling back and revealing Schofield and Blake taking a break. They rouse themselves and begin walking, first past more resting soldiers, then the mess, then down a ramp into the trenches. We see the tactile transition from Edenic to hellish because we're moving in real-time through the milieu; we see the boundary between peace and war because the characters walk along that boundary. You shoot this sequence conventionally, and you undercut that.

Along slightly more conventional lines, one has to commend Deakins's work during the nighttime scenes in Écoust-Saint-Mein. As we pass through the ruined town, the only light is from flares creating very hard shadows in constant motion. The whole thing is almost otherworldly, and as the light traverses the sky, it's as if the ground itself is in motion. You won't find a better study in how to compose a sequence using light and shadow.

Thematically, by its very nature, 1917 is far more focused on the micro than the macro – you might learn something about life on the front, but you'll learn nothing about the politics behind the conflict. Partly because of this, it avoids, for the most part, the kind of cartoonish jingoism that make films like Saving Private Ryan (1998) so obnoxious. Indeed, the protagonists' nationality is largely anonymous, which is not something you can usually say of a war film. On the other hand, you shouldn't expect too much psychological insight. The Thin Red Line (1998) it most definitely isn't.

The story is unquestionably paper-thin, but that's by design. One criticism I did have, however, is how well-groomed Scholfield and Blake are. One only need watch They Shall Not Grow Old (2018) to see how unrealistic this is. Indeed, they look like they've just stepped out of the makeup trailer most of the time, and it's glaring enough to pull you out of things on occasion.

All things considered though, I thoroughly enjoyed 1917. The single-shot strategy worked well, and even if the film is weak from a character/storyline/theme perspective, it didn't really matter when form and content are this well matched. It could have been an empty technical exercise, but Mendes hasn't allowed that to happen. The Great War was hell on Earth. 1917 doesn't make us feel what that hell was like. Because no art form can do that. But it's a very fine approximation.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

GLADIADORJan 26, 2020

Filme muito bom, com cenas de ação incriveis, so acho ele lento ate demais, mais é um filme bonito de se assistir

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

8

ViccoMay 31, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Amazing movie.
Touching story.
My favorite part is when he meets the french lady and gives her milk for the baby.
I also think they should have done the waterfall part different more realistic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ILikeToBreatheNov 7, 2020

Loved it. A touching story and relatively accurate historically, though I think they could have done more with the 'one continuous shot' idea.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ChrisPaniaguaApr 20, 2021

Although it might seem like just another war plot, the "uncut" sequential shot is the originality of this film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Diesel6401Mar 26, 2020

Excellent! Beautifully shot.
Great story. Fantastic score, although I would have had Ed Sheeran camo for Wayfaring Stranger - his version years ago was fantastic. For a fan of war films - must see!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ArthuuFeb 21, 2020

Impressively well directed, very atmospheric with stunning sound design and convincing play - a must watch

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

TheEventsOf1989Jan 11, 2020

As far as war movies go, "1917" was a fantastic watch. The story was well written, it didn't blow my socks off, and while I anticipated some of the reveals (midpoint reversal), they still affected me, and it didn't at all take away from theAs far as war movies go, "1917" was a fantastic watch. The story was well written, it didn't blow my socks off, and while I anticipated some of the reveals (midpoint reversal), they still affected me, and it didn't at all take away from the experience. The dialogue was very well crafted, and there was only maybe one line that I thought was to on the nose. The visuals are from Deakins (a very well known cinematographer) and as always he is tremendous. While maybe not every frame is epic or grandiose, the visuals encompass the tone while also adhering to each scene's needs.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

8

claire1205Jan 8, 2020

good,amazing,...............nice.........interesting movie..... love it...................................................

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

8

CPNJan 30, 2020

Excellent storytelling. Good ensemble performances all around. Although a simple story I was gripped throughout. The camera work was fantastic and there were some beautiful moments.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Stream2BigScreeJan 28, 2020

A Race Against Time in 1917

The Stream: The storyline is completely unimportant. The Big Screen: Tremendous filming, scenery and intense moments. The Final Bill: Travel down the intense path less traveled in 1917. -S2S Welcome backA Race Against Time in 1917

The Stream: The storyline is completely unimportant.

The Big Screen: Tremendous filming, scenery and intense moments.

The Final Bill: Travel down the intense path less traveled in 1917.

-S2S

Welcome back everyone! This week we were able to get an early screening of the movie, 1917. 1917 hits the theaters in limited release on Christmas Day, but it doesn’t go wide until January 17, 2020. Let’s get to the nitty gritty of this World War I spectacle.

Let’s get the plot out of the way, as it is the most forgettable part of the movie. 1917 features two young British privates during the First World War. Of course, the “powers that be” give the most expendable pawns with the most to lose the “impossible mission”. The privates must deliver a message deep in enemy territory that is necessary to save the lives of 1,600 men. And yes, of course, one of the privates has a brother among that 1,600 that must be saved from walking straight into a deadly German trap. Now that the first 5 minutes of the movie are out of the way, we can get to the brilliance.

To me one of the most awesome feats of this movie is the single shot filming. Now, we all know it is impossible to shoot a nearly two hour movie in one shot flawlessly, but truly the editing and camerawork is amazing. The single shot view enhances the feel of anxiety and urgency. Throughout the movie, I felt as if I couldn’t take my eyes off the screen. One thing I can be certain of is that this movie will definitely receive consideration during award season, especially for the cinematography by Roger Deakins.

The filming was great in the execution but also in the setting/scenery. While most of the movie is flat and barren due to the war-torn wasteland, yet the actors take us on the path less travelled. Seriously, through the ups and downs of bunkers, craters, farmlands, waterways, etc. the film moves us. Speaking of moving us, Chapman and MacKay provide a few moving moments, lame ones as well. Both do a very good job conveying the emotional rollercoaster that 1917 and war in general provides to our brave soldiers in the field. The viewer truly follows the ebbs and flows of the privates from beginning to end. We see you King Tommen.

Long story short, 1917 is an intense, watch your every step, war epic that will garner Oscar buzz from its incredible camera work and set management. The storyline is the most basic it can get but that’s not why you’re going to this movie in the first place. Get a bucket of popcorn and chow down while you race (pensively) to the end.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

ecw0647Jan 28, 2020

Just a comment on the review by Orioniscool. He says:, "This movie did hit me on a personal note, my grant [sic] grandfather served for England in WW1 and he saw clips of the movie and now he is hooked." Assuming his great-grandfather wasJust a comment on the review by Orioniscool. He says:, "This movie did hit me on a personal note, my grant [sic] grandfather served for England in WW1 and he saw clips of the movie and now he is hooked." Assuming his great-grandfather was horribly young to serve in WWI he would be over 130 which has to be some kind of record.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

akhilanJan 29, 2020

We have crossed across many war movie but 1917 might be a total different for you. For me, it's something a strange way of execution and portrayal. The uninterrupted shots make us believable as a single one hop on me to the edge of the seatWe have crossed across many war movie but 1917 might be a total different for you. For me, it's something a strange way of execution and portrayal. The uninterrupted shots make us believable as a single one hop on me to the edge of the seat many more times on the theater. Roger Deakins was exceptional with his photography along with Lee Smith's brilliant hide way editing. That was in my mind that the film is formatted in one single shot but I just want to experience the truth inside and there is something in my mind that it might have the same pattern as Birdman and Rope. Exactly, it was right. Poetically we can say, the film flows like a river. It has that kinetics from the first frame to the end. Into the list of brilliant war epics, I must add 1917 and give a prominent role there.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

AsclepiusJan 31, 2020

Something about continuous shot movies I really admire, but this film was particularly good in that I didn't feel it drag. Everyone involved with the production should be proud.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

kasaletkaFeb 1, 2020

Good afternoon, come here. I want to say some of my thoughts on the film. I think the film deserves this assessment because it strongly touches on the theme of the horrors of war, which should now be shown in any movie about the war. Also,Good afternoon, come here. I want to say some of my thoughts on the film. I think the film deserves this assessment because it strongly touches on the theme of the horrors of war, which should now be shown in any movie about the war. Also, the plot here is not bad enough, but at the beginning we are somehow not brought up to date with everything that happens at the front. Therefore, a solid eight, I really liked the film, I advise everyone to go down who has at least some representation of the Great War… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

D_TTFeb 1, 2020

This movie does everything it's trying to do right but does something's it's not trying to do very wrong. The emotional wait of every scene in this movie is insane. Even though a lot of the movie is spent simply walking it somehow manages toThis movie does everything it's trying to do right but does something's it's not trying to do very wrong. The emotional wait of every scene in this movie is insane. Even though a lot of the movie is spent simply walking it somehow manages to make it incredibly interesting, when the real action starts it is really really good. The main issues I have with this movie are that it is quite slow to get going, it also has a very weird sence of time, they say it will take around 6 hours to make the journey but it is completed in 2. Lastly I absolutely hate how much motion blur is in this film, you cant look at anything except what the camera is focusing on, I actually came out of the cinema with a headache it was so bad (I didnt watch it in 3d) all in all a great movie with just some minor flaws.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

ThePeruvianPostFeb 18, 2020

"Director Sam Mendes employs distinctive but extraordinary shots in the first person during the two-hour footage, which makes the production work in many different ways. Although it sometimes results too shaky, it is thanks to George MacKay"Director Sam Mendes employs distinctive but extraordinary shots in the first person during the two-hour footage, which makes the production work in many different ways. Although it sometimes results too shaky, it is thanks to George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman's performances that 1917 preserves both sombre but optimistic tones throughout the montage. In short, this is an exceptional approach to memorialise the hundredth anniversary of the end of the First World War".
...
We are somewhere in France during the Trench Warfare [1915 - 1917] with a depleted British Army; the atmosphere, alongside with the dialogues, can define by itself how was life at the front: scarce water and food, despair between soldiers to go home, endless weapons and corpses scattered on the floor, and so forth. Corporals Blake and Schofield are told to attain a severe/impossible mission despite not having any reinforcements. Before achieving this goal in sending General MacKenzie [Bennedict Cumberbatch] the infamous fallback letter, both privates must penetrate the frightful No Man's Land and experience horrendous life-and-death encounters in many places.
...
Regardless of the silent second half, the absence of preeminent performers and the woozy experience of watching the film in one sole perspective director Sam Mendes and executive producers deliver an eloquent portrayal about surprising facts of the four-year global conflict. For example, both soldiers are bewildered by the superiority of the German trenches in proportions and in quality considering that historically they were far better equipped than the Allied ones which allow the audience the opportunity of a lifetime to analyse the condition millions of innocent citizens were facing. The result improves with some accurate shots at landscapes, underground warfare channels, entire villages pulverised, etcetera. I must acknowledge the last fifteen minutes of the film; it has been a long time since I spotted such an imposing ending. Countless emotions appear regardless of having reached the climax. What a masterpiece ladies and gentlemen!
...
What amazes me the most is that despite being a World War film, 1917 does not give the impression in duplicating the ordinary details of previous same-genre releases such as Hacksaw Ridge [2017]. Once Mr Gibson introduced a brief biography of Desmond Doss [the main character] he began recording some ultraviolent scenes as though you were spotting the most savage state of humankind. As an alternative, 1917 delivers some innovative procedures in creating a war film without increasing the brutal strength of instant classics as Saving Private Ryan.
...
Congratulations!
...
[80/100]… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

skyhelper0505Feb 19, 2020

지위가 있는 간부도 아닌 일개 두명의 병사가 영화 전체를 긴장감 안에서 풀어나가는 전개가 상당히 흥미진진했다. 특히 독특한 촬영기법으로 마치 잘 만들어진 비디오 게임속에서 전쟁을 직접 체험하는 듯한 느낌을 선사해주고 영화가 끝나고나서 안도의 숨을 내쉬었던 작품.지위가 있는 간부도 아닌 일개 두명의 병사가 영화 전체를 긴장감 안에서 풀어나가는 전개가 상당히 흥미진진했다. 특히 독특한 촬영기법으로 마치 잘 만들어진 비디오 게임속에서 전쟁을 직접 체험하는 듯한 느낌을 선사해주고 영화가 끝나고나서 안도의 숨을 내쉬었던 작품.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews