Universal Pictures | Release Date: December 25, 2019
8.3
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 954 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
846
Mixed:
69
Negative:
39
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
9
eagleeyevikingApr 21, 2020
While the screenplay can feel mawkish, "1917" is still a technically masterful, immersive, and impeccably shot WW1 drama.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
jacob4Jan 18, 2020
1917 is truly a marvelous fantastic war film like no other! You must see this movie to truly appreciate every aspect of this amazing movie. Everything about this movie is just magnificent, from the action, to the story, to the incredible feat1917 is truly a marvelous fantastic war film like no other! You must see this movie to truly appreciate every aspect of this amazing movie. Everything about this movie is just magnificent, from the action, to the story, to the incredible feat of filming the entire movie in like two long continuous takes! An absolute thrill ride from start to finish with plenty of thrills and some heart wrenching moments thrown in there as well. Definitely one of the greatest feat in cinematic history! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
condythugFeb 1, 2020
excellent ww1 movie; nicely shot without gratuitous blood and gore. actors are generally ok although it might be an even better movie if it had top quality actors to bring out the characters.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
GeorgemortinJan 11, 2020
Esta película es una obra de arte, y solo con la forma de ser dirigida con esos largos planos secuencia merece ser vista en el cine.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
9
Kalele005Jan 13, 2020
i don't go watch movie in theater often in fact i don't go at all but i listenened what the director of the movie said it's a movie made to be experienced on a big screen so i did go watch it in theater and he was right, that movie is such ani don't go watch movie in theater often in fact i don't go at all but i listenened what the director of the movie said it's a movie made to be experienced on a big screen so i did go watch it in theater and he was right, that movie is such an emotive experience i'm quite young and can easy relate to the characters,i love both main character and i felt their friendship i just think that dean chapman death felt really early in the story they should have develop the friendship the two character more but life can be inpredictable i think it was the desire to the writer to shock peoples if it was i was really sad about his death,the movie other than that is almost a masterpiece not everyone will agree with me it's a movie to entertain people it did is job, i just think that other countries aren't the ennemy but in that movie they are shown as such it's war peoples were crazy as a human being that movie just shown me a reality that i hope will never be again, let's be wise humankind,that movie was entertaining,hearthbreaking and intense, sam mandes is really a good director and a good human being. I don't regret any second of it, i didn't seen time go by,it's a movie who would deserved a 3hours long experience! =) i hope sam mandes will do other movies with that high quality and emotion drive i'll go more often in cinema watch his work. He deserve the oscar 2020. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
PanchogulJan 11, 2020
Una instantánea obra maestra en todos los aspectos posibles, a nivel técnico es perfecta, el montaje de la película está hecho de forma tal que de la impresión de ser un permanente plano secuencia, lo que hará que el espectador se mantengaUna instantánea obra maestra en todos los aspectos posibles, a nivel técnico es perfecta, el montaje de la película está hecho de forma tal que de la impresión de ser un permanente plano secuencia, lo que hará que el espectador se mantenga atento a la pantalla pudiendo apenas pestañear, la banda sonora y edición de sonido son impecablemente asombrosos y el diseño de producción es maravilloso. A nivel actoral es inmejorable, al protagonista lo vemos permanentemente expuesto a la cámara por lo que podemos ponernos fácilmente en sus zapatos, su rango emocional es bastante discreto pero bien logrado, podemos ver cómo progresivamente es devastado por todas las situaciones vividas en la cinta, no es una actuación a nivel de grandes premiaciones, pero es muy buena sin duda alguna.

Le ganó el Globo de Oro a Mejor Película al Joker y siendo objetivo, merece todos los premios a Mejor Película, Mejor Montaje y Mejor Fotografía, quizás también Mejor Sonido y Banda Sonora.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
SrPepeJan 24, 2020
1917 es una película excelente, la producción, el sonido, la fotografía, todo es excelente y personalmente me atrapo desde los primeros minutos.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Lone_Wolf_SonesFeb 3, 2020
Following They Shall Not Grow Old, 1917 is the latest WW1 film to hit the silver screen. While They Shall Not Grow Old is more accurate by virtue of the use of actual footage and documentary style? 1917 is still inspired by the real accountsFollowing They Shall Not Grow Old, 1917 is the latest WW1 film to hit the silver screen. While They Shall Not Grow Old is more accurate by virtue of the use of actual footage and documentary style? 1917 is still inspired by the real accounts of director Sam Mendes'grandfather. Mendes has made it clear that 1917 is a fictional story with fictional characters. However that doesn't mean it doesn't feel authentic. Much like They Shall Not Grow Old; 1917 gets much of it's authenticity from the way it is crafted. Filmed/manufactured to give the impression of one long continuous shot, you are made to feel like your right there with these characters. Your there in the claustrophobic confines of the trenches as well as the misery and muck of no man's land.

If the film has one flaw? It's that the characters themselves aren't all that well developed. But given the way the movie is filmed I am willing to forgive that because of how ambitious it is. It's also fair I think that these two men are just two ordinary men that are given a herculean task (as shown in the trailers). They are caught up in events bigger than themselves. We do get small snippets and vignettes that give us an idea of what these characters are like. But don't go in expecting something like Band of Brothers where you see characters grow and change over the course of several episodes. It's not the underlying point of this movie. There are some spectacular moments in the film that make you sit on the edge of your seat. Again I don't think you'd get the same experience if not for the way it was shot. This is a stunning technical achievement and a definite Oscar contender for cinematography.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
savvas1967Jan 11, 2020
Best film I’ve seen for years !!! A masterpiece of a movie .I did not expect this !! A brilliant absolutely astonishing film for an antiwar movie
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
UridonJan 12, 2020
war is bad, not much more to it. not bad not great
;xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;xxfffffffffffffffffffffff
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
irbeguiFeb 4, 2020
a great movie, the camera, photography, the tension of it, without any cut, I really had many years without seeing a war movie that shows raw that it is and above all that focused on that, it's not the typical shooting movie and a hero thata great movie, the camera, photography, the tension of it, without any cut, I really had many years without seeing a war movie that shows raw that it is and above all that focused on that, it's not the typical shooting movie and a hero that can against all , you see human suffering, despair and above all the decline of the first world war, it really is a film that one should see if or if. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
PepeLobos1Jan 25, 2020
WENA PELICULA CULIA ENTERA DETONADA, UNA DE LAS MEJORES DEL 2019, CHUPA EL PICO PIÑERA, AGUANTE LA PRIMERA LINEA VIEJA.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
Acoustic_TomJan 18, 2020
1917 is a visual storytelling masterpiece. The one shot camera is a visual feat that lends itself to the tragic tales of two soldiers delivering a message to a general on the western front.
Throughout the film there is a constant feeling of
1917 is a visual storytelling masterpiece. The one shot camera is a visual feat that lends itself to the tragic tales of two soldiers delivering a message to a general on the western front.
Throughout the film there is a constant feeling of anxiety that you truly share with the characters as the camera never cuts. A true masterpiece of story, film
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
Harsh657Jan 19, 2020
1917 is a film that takes you on a journey that you won't forget your entire life. You will feel like you are with these 2 characters and you will every every emotion they feel. It feels like a one continuous shot and it is done with such1917 is a film that takes you on a journey that you won't forget your entire life. You will feel like you are with these 2 characters and you will every every emotion they feel. It feels like a one continuous shot and it is done with such perfection that you won't even notice if there was as cut.
Cinematography is outstanding and I think this time Roger Deakins will win an oscar.
The thing that can bother you is that it feels like a video-game. Also there are no emotional backstory given to the characters which is the only think that I have an issue with.
It is a must watch in theatre and I think everyone should experience this in theatres.
Grade: A-
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
GLADIADORJan 26, 2020
Filme muito bom, com cenas de ação incriveis, so acho ele lento ate demais, mais é um filme bonito de se assistir
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
TASOSJan 11, 2020
A breath-taking Masterpiece. You walk out the cinema and you ask your shelf what was that you saw. Cinephiles have to see this film twice, just to understand how was it shot. The movie of the decade!
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
DerekReideJan 11, 2020
1917...That's going to be a film I'll be talking about for a long time. Straight up, it's a war film masterpiece. It'll be the best movie of the year for a long time until I see more movies, but if anything, it'll be in my top 3. It's my1917...That's going to be a film I'll be talking about for a long time. Straight up, it's a war film masterpiece. It'll be the best movie of the year for a long time until I see more movies, but if anything, it'll be in my top 3. It's my favorite war film by far. The story is so humane, gutwrenching, and pure. The immersion and realism this film goes for is stunning. I swear, they shot the film in 2 halves. I don't think there was a single cut until a certain part of the film. And that's a very far point into the movie itself. If anything, there was probably one transition that I never noticed. My eyes were so locked on the screen and I just drifted into the movie as another soldier watching the events. My heart was pounding, I was fearful, but overall, I was so stunned and stoked that this movie lived higher than my anticipations. The climax sends chills, major intensity and squirms, and overall, sheer beauty with the cinematography. The visuals were incredibly captivating, the acting was stellar, and the production design was awesome. 1917 deserves all the awards it'll get. And that's saying something. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Lonewolf63Jan 22, 2020
1917,what can I say that others haven't already. Was it amazing, yes. Was the cinematography as good as described, yes. Did it feel real, yes. the only thing else I can say is .. War, war never changes.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
BrunoVn00Jan 22, 2020
This movie isn't about the characters or the story...This movie is an experience. Really if you think about the characters, they are pretty weak and underdeveloped, but at least the performances of the main actors are pretty good. The storyThis movie isn't about the characters or the story...This movie is an experience. Really if you think about the characters, they are pretty weak and underdeveloped, but at least the performances of the main actors are pretty good. The story is pretty straight-forward get to point A to point B and there isn't anything too special to it, but, like I said, this is more about the experience. This movie achieves to make the viewer feel part of the war, which I think that was the intention of the one-continuous take "gimmick" (which it isn't). This movie is called 1917 instead of "The Adventure of blue-eyed blond Soldier" (that's why the characters are forgettable, I can't remember their names) because the long take is what adds to the experience. Sure, the long take isn't obviously anything new and movies like Birdman (I know, they are completely different genres) make it better, but for this movie it works. Some moments feel slow and all but, again, it adds to the whole point of feeling part of the war. The sound design and the cinematography are great and the score, while sometimes it sounds like generic stock music, sometimes it sounds amazing. Overall, this movie is more about the experience than the characters or plot. I recommend it because is still a pretty good movie. I don't think it's a masterpiece or the best of the year but it is certainly a really well done film. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
DiptanshuFeb 19, 2020
Wow!That ending was heart warming,literally from starting each and every moment was engaging but after sometime pacing was somewhat disturbed but tension and gripping was to the point great score,cinematography and good acting performances asWow!That ending was heart warming,literally from starting each and every moment was engaging but after sometime pacing was somewhat disturbed but tension and gripping was to the point great score,cinematography and good acting performances as well cameos were great!at last a good movie with crazy camera shots especially felt we are living in it! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
BeardedYodaJan 21, 2020
1917 is one of the best war films I have seen in a long time and the minor flaws in it don't hold back the film much at all. You have to see it.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
BradMorganJan 18, 2020
This movie touches you. A portrait of the terrible reality that once took place. Emotional, powerfully and portrayed in a beautiful way (like a "one-take"). This film will stay with you!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Sierra-117Jan 23, 2020
1917, the most recent film by acclaimed director Sam Mendes (skyfall, American beauty), is a phenomenon to say the least. With a magnificent combination of excellent editing, superb acting and an outstanding score from Thomas Newman, 1917 is1917, the most recent film by acclaimed director Sam Mendes (skyfall, American beauty), is a phenomenon to say the least. With a magnificent combination of excellent editing, superb acting and an outstanding score from Thomas Newman, 1917 is a rare example of absolute cinematic perfection. Like 2014s Birdman (A personal favorite of mine) 1917 has been, to my delight cut so cleanly it gives the illusion of a single take and like Birdman, it works exceptionally conveying a feeling of realism and desperation never before seen in a film. The movie is to my understanding shot entirely in Scotland, and Mendes makes use of the stunning landscapes whilst also creating his own sets providing a dramatic and even shocking contrast between the two. For example, The film opens in a luscious field full of plants and other wildlife, but very quickly as our protagonists enter the trenches you are introduced to the desolate wastes of No mans’s land. Thomas Newman really does a fantastic job with the movie’s soundtrack, which feeds wonderfully into the already immersive atmosphere. It strikes the perfect balance of being calm and soft in some instances, or extremely intense in others. Another thing that really stood out was the incredible sound design. Here, every gunshot has weight, causing each and every one to make you question whether or not it landed.
The cast is also brilliant, with each actor giving stellar performances and countless cameos from well renowned figures such as Benedict Cumberbatch, Colin Firth, Mark Strong and Richard Madden. The story remains consistent throughout the film keeping you guessing and on the edge of your seat at all times, but some could (maybe) argue that there were some minor pacing issues, but other than that there is no more I can say.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
DMLYxCriticJan 23, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Gritty, violent, emotional and cathartic. These are the words that comes into mind after watching Sam Mendes' World War I take, 1917. Unlike any other war movies of late, this film seems to take on a fresher approach with its "one shot" cinematography, although it became quite problematic in the long run as the audiences get frustrated, wanting to see the whole thing. It also affected the editing, as some scenes that were supposedly essential are sacrificed for the singular shot cinematography. But it also has its perks, though, as it made the film much more grittier. Overall, this film is a wild ride into the horrors of the first World War, something that isn't quite tackled in any other war films. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MiloGrayJan 11, 2020
A cinematic masterpiece! Absolutely incredible acting with an incredible cast!! I’m definitely gonna see it again - if u read this - see 1917 now or I’ll cut ur throats
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
Hwinter07Jan 16, 2020
Best movie of the year in my opinion. Excellent cinematography and score coupled with the spectacular "long shot" style of filming.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
RaventhornJan 17, 2020
From the moment the movie begins to the end, the movie shows you the horrors of World War 1 and keeps you in suspense as to what will happen to the men and the mission. Great pace and suspense!
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
ChrisM1979Jan 20, 2020
As just a movie maybe it wasn't a 10 but for people interested in film making this was a masterpiece. As a movie alone I will give it an 8 but for what it achieved from a film making perspective a 10 so overall I'd give it a 9.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
DerekMedeirosJan 10, 2020
The best film I’ve seen all year, and that includes 2019. Beautifully shot and executed. Truly a mastery of cinematography. Can not recommend this movie more.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
Swaggerdude11Jan 11, 2020
Phenomenal movie, gritty, dark, and most of all historically accurate to the brutalities of warfare.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
TheJokerxJan 12, 2020
1917 is one of the best movies I’ve ever seen don’t listen to the negative reviews and watch it yourself and by the way it was WAY better than Dunkirk
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
RaginglamottaJan 12, 2020
This movie is a classic which is hard to stomach and shows the horrors of war
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
Cinemalover1Jan 12, 2020
The cinematography and the camera work wowww, this movie deserved best motion picture and best director at the globes
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
KingMercuryJan 12, 2020
1917 is one of the best war movies ever made, Hope it gets best cinematography and best score at the least
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
TheTerminatorrJan 12, 2020
1917 is one of the greatest achievements of 2019 of not the greatest, have been listening to the score for days now
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
QueenloverJan 12, 2020
1917 really captures the first WW in a captivating way and is 2019s best movie along with The Irishman
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
ThebaynewazeJan 12, 2020
One of the best movies I have ever seen in my life, thank you and good job Sam Mendes
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
Jamesbond008Jan 12, 2020
This is one of my favourite movies of all time, captivating performances by George McKay and Chapman, excellent cinematography and score wouldn’t be mad at all if this won best picture.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
FerreAndradeJan 25, 2020
Beautifully crafted film. Editing was seamless. And felt as if In one shot it was filmed. Stunning
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MartyscorseseJan 12, 2020
A movie that was far better than Dunkirk, love this movie and hope it wins many academy awards
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
9
MaksCoolJan 14, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 9 из-за пары недочётов и фейл моментов. Но оно очень классное и великое и передоёт весь ужас войны Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
DasWizzyJan 15, 2020
1 Take is all you need I guess, ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect ect
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
Photog1Jan 16, 2020
Do not listen to the bad reviews...this is a masterpiece. There are always critics who have to be the one bad review. This should win Best Picture.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
Jcummings2Jan 18, 2020
One of the most beautifully shot war movies I have ever seen. Nice story, very good acting. Great film.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Cart3rJan 21, 2020
1917 is a masterpiece, breathtaking, it makes your heart beat fast from the beginning to the end. Great soundtrack.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
MaciejkamilJan 25, 2020
It's a great movie, since not only does it show that being humane during the war will be used by the enemy, but it also shows the enemy who is a real threat, not a stormtrooper.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
Stream2BigScreeJan 28, 2020
A Race Against Time in 1917

The Stream: The storyline is completely unimportant. The Big Screen: Tremendous filming, scenery and intense moments. The Final Bill: Travel down the intense path less traveled in 1917. -S2S Welcome back
A Race Against Time in 1917

The Stream: The storyline is completely unimportant.

The Big Screen: Tremendous filming, scenery and intense moments.

The Final Bill: Travel down the intense path less traveled in 1917.

-S2S

Welcome back everyone! This week we were able to get an early screening of the movie, 1917. 1917 hits the theaters in limited release on Christmas Day, but it doesn’t go wide until January 17, 2020. Let’s get to the nitty gritty of this World War I spectacle.

Let’s get the plot out of the way, as it is the most forgettable part of the movie. 1917 features two young British privates during the First World War. Of course, the “powers that be” give the most expendable pawns with the most to lose the “impossible mission”. The privates must deliver a message deep in enemy territory that is necessary to save the lives of 1,600 men. And yes, of course, one of the privates has a brother among that 1,600 that must be saved from walking straight into a deadly German trap. Now that the first 5 minutes of the movie are out of the way, we can get to the brilliance.

To me one of the most awesome feats of this movie is the single shot filming. Now, we all know it is impossible to shoot a nearly two hour movie in one shot flawlessly, but truly the editing and camerawork is amazing. The single shot view enhances the feel of anxiety and urgency. Throughout the movie, I felt as if I couldn’t take my eyes off the screen. One thing I can be certain of is that this movie will definitely receive consideration during award season, especially for the cinematography by Roger Deakins.

The filming was great in the execution but also in the setting/scenery. While most of the movie is flat and barren due to the war-torn wasteland, yet the actors take us on the path less travelled. Seriously, through the ups and downs of bunkers, craters, farmlands, waterways, etc. the film moves us. Speaking of moving us, Chapman and MacKay provide a few moving moments, lame ones as well. Both do a very good job conveying the emotional rollercoaster that 1917 and war in general provides to our brave soldiers in the field. The viewer truly follows the ebbs and flows of the privates from beginning to end. We see you King Tommen.

Long story short, 1917 is an intense, watch your every step, war epic that will garner Oscar buzz from its incredible camera work and set management. The storyline is the most basic it can get but that’s not why you’re going to this movie in the first place. Get a bucket of popcorn and chow down while you race (pensively) to the end.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
ecw0647Jan 28, 2020
Just a comment on the review by Orioniscool. He says:, "This movie did hit me on a personal note, my grant [sic] grandfather served for England in WW1 and he saw clips of the movie and now he is hooked." Assuming his great-grandfather wasJust a comment on the review by Orioniscool. He says:, "This movie did hit me on a personal note, my grant [sic] grandfather served for England in WW1 and he saw clips of the movie and now he is hooked." Assuming his great-grandfather was horribly young to serve in WWI he would be over 130 which has to be some kind of record. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
felipguilera10Jan 30, 2020
HABEMUS PELICULÓN. Película en la cual se interpreta a dos jóvenes soldados británicos una misión prácticamente suicida en la cual tienen que salvar a una compañía británica que está a punto de caer en una trampa de los alemanes. AmbientaciónHABEMUS PELICULÓN. Película en la cual se interpreta a dos jóvenes soldados británicos una misión prácticamente suicida en la cual tienen que salvar a una compañía británica que está a punto de caer en una trampa de los alemanes. Ambientación increíble, banda sonora de 10, los actores lo hacen excelente. Empezamos fuertes el 2020. Ojalá sea un buen año para el cine. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
AsclepiusJan 31, 2020
Something about continuous shot movies I really admire, but this film was particularly good in that I didn't feel it drag. Everyone involved with the production should be proud.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
IAmaMovieGeekApr 29, 2020
Epic war movie with fantastic screenplay and visuals. Please see this film! It deserved it's Oscar award. 9/10
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
DimocracyJul 6, 2023
I adore the cinematography in this movie, very talented, just a masterpiece!
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
donelsonFeb 13, 2020
Truly astonishing filmmaking. The long take woth camera leading then following then side tracking seamlessly, fluidly brings us close to the players in a way that I've never seen before. Roger Deakins is a magician, far beyond a master. SamTruly astonishing filmmaking. The long take woth camera leading then following then side tracking seamlessly, fluidly brings us close to the players in a way that I've never seen before. Roger Deakins is a magician, far beyond a master. Sam Mendes vision is astounding, yet tempered by some truly intimate moments, truly poignant. Especially loved "the miracle of the milk". Oscar worthy in many ways. Must see. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JoeCoolFeb 1, 2020
The continouos one shot of the movie is it's main feature. It unfortunately also limits what can be done in storytelling. In a massive action scene it's really a phenomenal achievement, but in rather boring uneventful scenes you as a viewerThe continouos one shot of the movie is it's main feature. It unfortunately also limits what can be done in storytelling. In a massive action scene it's really a phenomenal achievement, but in rather boring uneventful scenes you as a viewer have to walk the distance. The one shot gimmick makes the movie less enjoyable than it could be IMO. Sticking with at least trying to make it look like it was shot in one go does have downsides. If you admire how movies are made you'll probably be extatic about this one. If you're just in it to see a good movie, you might be slightly disappointed. Don't let the hoarde of one-review 10's fool you. This is not a movie you just have to see for anything other than to marvel at the technical one-shot feat. While it is quite the remarkable achievement it's also it's achilles heel. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
mbeckfordOct 17, 2020
An epic visual masterpiece of the often ignored (at least in this generation) horror of World War I.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
gracjanskiMar 29, 2020
Wow, what a movie. I am still excited. After 5 minutes you get the feeling, that this movie is special, because it is a long shot and clever done, where you see more and more of the dugout. After 10 minutes I was asking myself, if they areWow, what a movie. I am still excited. After 5 minutes you get the feeling, that this movie is special, because it is a long shot and clever done, where you see more and more of the dugout. After 10 minutes I was asking myself, if they are crazy, there is still no edit, and still the first shot. When do they end it? After more minutes I was looking where did they hid the edits. But this is not the only genius thing in the movie. The cameraman made a perfect job and shows you only the things, you shall see to get a certain feeling and the moods in the pictures are changing slowly...but still on one shot. Perfect. In addition you are all the time close to the protagonists. What a organisation to do it with so few shots.
And of course the actors. It is so demanding to avoid mistakes for so long and act for so long.
Ok, but there are some few things I didnt like: There were some unrealistic scenes, not only, that the germans could shoot well, but also their behaviour was not realistic.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
lager96Jul 15, 2020
1917 hit all the right notes that it needed to make me love it. The first time watching this movie in the theater was a great experience and I went back a week later to watch it again! The movie builds to a climax and then continues and1917 hit all the right notes that it needed to make me love it. The first time watching this movie in the theater was a great experience and I went back a week later to watch it again! The movie builds to a climax and then continues and repeats. The one take feel adds so much to the story and makes you truly feel like you're with the characters. The final 20min is so good and gives me chills every time I watch it. Everything about this movie is great and is my favorite film of 2019. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
naufri27May 24, 2020
Secuencias imponentes y una gran interpretación de su actor principal para narrarnos la misión de un soldado anónimo, pasando por diferentes escenarios del frente.
Se echa en falta algo más de crítica social sobre lo que significó la Gran
Secuencias imponentes y una gran interpretación de su actor principal para narrarnos la misión de un soldado anónimo, pasando por diferentes escenarios del frente.
Se echa en falta algo más de crítica social sobre lo que significó la Gran Guerra.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Voodoo123Feb 10, 2020
1917 looks stunning in places, I was really impressed by the 'one shot'style and some very clever 'impossible camera' moments (esp drifting down into the crater!). Overall impressive production value to be seen here. The story was basic yet I1917 looks stunning in places, I was really impressed by the 'one shot'style and some very clever 'impossible camera' moments (esp drifting down into the crater!). Overall impressive production value to be seen here. The story was basic yet I never quite felt connected to any of the characters and I felt the modern film score was inappropriate in places over blowing the more emotional sequences. To get so much so right within an over saturated genre like this is in itself an achievement so there's that. Worth a look IMO. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
mcblancaflorJul 8, 2020
1917 reminds us that film is and will always be an art form. A very simple yet compelling story told in a manner where audience were immersed in a wide open field yet a very claustrophobic feel. The pre-production prep should’ve been so1917 reminds us that film is and will always be an art form. A very simple yet compelling story told in a manner where audience were immersed in a wide open field yet a very claustrophobic feel. The pre-production prep should’ve been so grueling. The blocking was phenomenal. The timing of the shots to make sure the sun is covered by the clouds requires a lot of dedication. 

Personally, my favorite part of the film is the deserted city inhabited by the Germans. Deakins is really a master of light. The timing of the flares just to make sure they film the shadows waving through George Mackay is perfect. There is nothing like it. There is nothing like 1917 and we, as viewers, are blessed to have it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
superbatApr 29, 2021
1917 is, in some ways, a mixed bag. From a visual standpoint, the film is a masterpiece. The one-shot technique is executed well. The action scenes are harrowing. The settings in the battlefields are vivid. The film excels at capturing the1917 is, in some ways, a mixed bag. From a visual standpoint, the film is a masterpiece. The one-shot technique is executed well. The action scenes are harrowing. The settings in the battlefields are vivid. The film excels at capturing the brutal and dreadful nature of war. main drawback to this movie is that it focuses on the technical aspects at the expense of a good storyline. The film invests little time in its characters and their backgrounds, as a result of the focus being on the protagonists quest to accomplish their mission. Without that connection to the characters, remaining engaged was difficult. 1917's visuals and technical aspects made it a good war film. However, it falls short of greatness due to a lack of a compelling storyline Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JP32Mar 25, 2020
To discuss this movie based on its cinematography alone, ignores how stunning the rest of the movie is, and the way every element works together. Forget the "gimmick" talk. 1917 is simply a brilliant, harrowing war film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
eva3si0nJan 4, 2021
1917 great military drama. There is no pseudogeroity and a lot of patriotic speeches. The story is simple and quite real. And while as in Dunkirk the true enemy is not very often shown, the film keeps in tension throughout time. Yeah,1917 great military drama. There is no pseudogeroity and a lot of patriotic speeches. The story is simple and quite real. And while as in Dunkirk the true enemy is not very often shown, the film keeps in tension throughout time. Yeah, operator 's work, it 's better than what 's in the movie. Made just fine, one of the best films of 2019. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
samstylleApr 7, 2020
This movie is one of the most tense and exciting movies I've seen in years. Amazing cinematography and overall amazing experience of a movie.
The best movie ever. Very touching. Deserved the Oscar of direction.
I THOROUGHLY RECOMMEND
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Mitya64Feb 9, 2020
Отличный фильм про двух пацанов. Сьемка просто вау, без склеек монтажа, почти весь фильм. При этом там происходит боевые действия, сменяются локации, люди погибают.Отличный фильм про двух пацанов. Сьемка просто вау, без склеек монтажа, почти весь фильм. При этом там происходит боевые действия, сменяются локации, люди погибают.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DubeauJan 21, 2020
Interesting style for a war movie. It is filmed in one shot sequence (you will know were they cut). The story is more of a journey. Emotions are established in an intimate settings most of the time. The FX are excellent. The acting veryInteresting style for a war movie. It is filmed in one shot sequence (you will know were they cut). The story is more of a journey. Emotions are established in an intimate settings most of the time. The FX are excellent. The acting very sincere. There some tense moments. The dialogues felt true to me. I would have like to know more about the main character. I give it 82%, Nothing bad to say. It's an interesting way to present WW1, not always valid but visually captivating. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SebkApr 23, 2020
1917 is a movie with an excellent visual representation and a good but predictable story from one specific point of the film. Besides, the movie some absurds moments that makes you feel out of the atmosphere. However, the movie has strong1917 is a movie with an excellent visual representation and a good but predictable story from one specific point of the film. Besides, the movie some absurds moments that makes you feel out of the atmosphere. However, the movie has strong points in relation to the very good performance of the actors, the use of sequence shot, and the visual representation that involves you in this good and warlike film.

--8/10--
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CoreGamer1408Jun 2, 2020
The reluctant heroes journey is a timeless tale that never fails to inspire if done well. 1917 did a pretty good job of that narratively. I was not impressed by the early to mid part of the films cinematography. It looked kind of a low budgetThe reluctant heroes journey is a timeless tale that never fails to inspire if done well. 1917 did a pretty good job of that narratively. I was not impressed by the early to mid part of the films cinematography. It looked kind of a low budget small screen production value.The gimmick of trying to present the film as one flowing shot from start to finish didn't really work. It was really easy to spot where the movie was cut up and sewn back together. The film picked up for me after half way. With some really nice cinematography in mid to late action sections. I ended up really rooting for this down to earth guy trying to do his best in the most desperate of times. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
JagzzFeb 10, 2020
There are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the warThere are plenty of stunning sets and visuals all strung together into one continuous shot that puts you front and center of the story. This film is all about the journey rather than the destination as we see later on that, not unlike the war itself, some things never seem to change. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Iamcritical86Aug 29, 2021
This picture was exceptionally well done all the way around. Excellent cinematography and overall a visual masterpiece! It's been a VERY long time since I've seen a film of this quality. 1917 will be a tough one to beat! I do believe we haveThis picture was exceptionally well done all the way around. Excellent cinematography and overall a visual masterpiece! It's been a VERY long time since I've seen a film of this quality. 1917 will be a tough one to beat! I do believe we have a classic on our hands here!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
kirkenderMay 10, 2020
World War One movies are so hot right now. This one is fine. The whole "continuous shot" gimmick mostly works and is technically impressive, however what is super grounded realism for the first half, becomes wildly outrageous for the secondWorld War One movies are so hot right now. This one is fine. The whole "continuous shot" gimmick mostly works and is technically impressive, however what is super grounded realism for the first half, becomes wildly outrageous for the second half and feels like a damned John Wick movie. Also for a film "depicting the horrors" of World War One, this is super sterile; which I understand, because it's not a gore filled horror movie, but the film loses it's footing in trying to be realistic and not wanting to be realistic enough to scare people. The first third and the last scene are amazing and totally worth the watch, toss the rest. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SoulWarfareFeb 27, 2020
People call this film "The Birdman of WWI" and to be fair that is a justified assessment. This entire film is filmed like it is one camera shot and it is AWESOME! think one of the most impressive thing apart from the one looking shot is thePeople call this film "The Birdman of WWI" and to be fair that is a justified assessment. This entire film is filmed like it is one camera shot and it is AWESOME! think one of the most impressive thing apart from the one looking shot is the AMAZING CINEMATOGRAPHY. This shouldn’t be no surprising since it is the legend himself Roger Deakins (Blade Runner 2049 Cinematographer). Every scene feels like a painting and it is absolutely stunning. There is a scene at night where the lighting was done in such a creative way that heighten the tension of the scene. On that note there must also be praise for the score by Thomas Newman who somehow manages to make a score that somehow manages toe elevate every scene and help tell the story. There is also some amazing sound design that manages to make the War actually scary with moments that give horror movie jump scares a run for its money. Additionally, the props and set design should also get praise for creating such large,realistic but elaborate sets to accommodate for a more natural one shot scene. Everything in this film just feels like a technical achievement. We haven’t even touched on the acting or story yet but just for the way this was filmed is already engaging enough. Nevertheless, the two main actors George MacKay as Lance Corporal William "Will" Schofield and Dean-Charles Chapma as Lance Corporal Thomas "Tom" Blake manages to do a phenomenal job in showing the horror of war and giving authentic,believable characters. The story, while relatively simple, is engaging enough to keep you invested in the objective of the main characters. They must send a message to allies stop them running into a trap. It’s simple but works well for the aim of one shot as now it makes the audience a part of the journey.

There isn’t much negative to this movie but I guess if I have to be quite nitpicky it is the fact that halfway through the movie there is a obvious cut. So this movie is actually really a two shot film. The cut was necessary to make the situation more desperate and allow for a unique change in scenery even though it was a bit of a jarring cut. Another sort of nitpick is that we don’t really get much info on the main characters. We get their names and we know what their mission is but their backstory is just given in tidbits. It goes in a Dunkirk route in which we care about these characters because of the situation they are in rather than the fact that we are invested in the characters. It can be argued that the tidbits more than gives you enough info about the characters but it’s really up to the audience in the end. Personally, I don’t find it too much of a fault but can see how others could consider it so.

Honestly my negatives are just nitpicks. This movie is amazing and it is definitely worth watching right now.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Snowden111Feb 19, 2020
Masterpiece. You have to watch this movie. The way it was shot was mind blowing. You have to watch this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
LivingTribunalSep 10, 2020
There isn’t any unnecessary shot in this…, no I’ll have to say this is a perfect masterpiece without having any unnecessary 1/1000 shot.

spoiler below: ----------------------------------------- First of all, Roger Deakins has accomplished
There isn’t any unnecessary shot in this…, no I’ll have to say this is a perfect masterpiece without having any unnecessary 1/1000 shot.

spoiler below:
-----------------------------------------

First of all, Roger Deakins has accomplished absolutely transcendent work using the one-take technique. But I often see that not many people recognize the movie’s well-organized plot. Schofield is a soldier who doesn’t have any certain direction of life just like many other soldiers. He's just tired of long-lasting war. I think his journey can also be considered as a journey of asking. He has to ask people to get to Colonel MacKenzie because the map is useless for him. The plot is very well designed in a symmetrical way. In the end, he runs along the trench line, not toward the enemy, and finally finds out that his way should be home.

p.s.
-"I'm only going over Jordan, I'm only going over home"
- When Blake died two soldiers appear to Schofield. One was short and little fat, and the other was tall and skinny just like Blake and Schofield. This scene shows that this film is really about ordinary soldiers.
-Unlike World War II, World War 1 didn't have any specific bad guy like Hitler, it was just a difference of ideology. This is why 1917 is different from all other war movies.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
PalpetineSheevMar 20, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The shot of Schofield running at the end of the film will become one of cinemas most iconic shots. Mark my words. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
markjamie20Feb 8, 2020
Technically brilliant with the cinematography and editing, but as an actual immersive movie experience it's lacking emotionally and is substantially hollow.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Marlock101Jul 31, 2020
This movie is a near-perfect representation of the gritty and dark reality of World War 1. This perfectly encapsulated the scale and gravity of the war. The protagonist is likable, and the characters are portrayed well (in terms of WW1This movie is a near-perfect representation of the gritty and dark reality of World War 1. This perfectly encapsulated the scale and gravity of the war. The protagonist is likable, and the characters are portrayed well (in terms of WW1 soldiers). Overall very emotional, well made, very impressive on a cinematographical level, and amazingly believable and immersive. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ViccoMay 31, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Amazing movie.
Touching story.
My favorite part is when he meets the french lady and gives her milk for the baby.
I also think they should have done the waterfall part different more realistic.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AJGo85Feb 9, 2020
There are not many films about World War I. The most well-known ones are anti-war dramas: All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), Grand Illusion (1938), Paths of Glory (1957), Gallipoli (1981). On the surface 1917 is a well-done, thrillingThere are not many films about World War I. The most well-known ones are anti-war dramas: All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), Grand Illusion (1938), Paths of Glory (1957), Gallipoli (1981). On the surface 1917 is a well-done, thrilling action-war movie. It is also such an immersive and intense experience that without making any overt political statement it is firmly an antiwar film. It may be a good, thrilling movie but it is never exciting in the way an adventure movie is exciting. Even in the quiet moments 1917 makes you want to be as far away from this war as possible and hope another one like it never happens.

The plot is simple and very straightforward. Two young British soldiers are selected to deliver a message to a distant regiment calling off an attack the next morning. If the attack goes forward 1,600 soldiers, including the brother of one of the messengers, will charge into a trap. The encounters Corporals Blake and Schofield (Dean-Charles Chapman and Georgy MacKay) have as they make their journey across enemy territory are what you might expect from a story about soldiers on a mission: attacks from the enemy, crossing paths with another group of soldiers, finding shelter that is actually dangerous, even stumbling across a villager trying to care for a child. 1917 isn’t a total onslaught to the senses for two hours though. There are respites here and there that allow us to get to know Blake and Schofield. There are some surprising cameos by well-known British actors along the way too (or unsurprising if you’ve seen the trailer or the cast list on IMDb). Fortunately, none of these cameos take you out of the movie (Andrew Scott and Mark Strong could slip comfortably into just about any movie).

Director Sam Mendes employs long takes and expert, precise cinematography by Roger Deakins and stealthy editing by Lee Smith to make the film look and feel as though it exists in one long unbroken shot. This gimmick works well for the movie when it is not distracting. In its successful moments the one-shot effect is largely responsible for the film’s frantic, immersive effect. The climatic sequence of Schofield running like mad across the top of a trench as a battle begins to find the colonel to call off the attack makes excellent use of the one shot effect; it had me gripping the armrests of my seat. Also, the nighttime sequence in a bombed-out village where flairs illuminate the night with a bright, eerie white light and a fire rages in the distance is surreal and terrifying. Other scenes, however, like when a group of soldiers (and the camera) climb into the back of a truck, then get out to push the truck, then climb back in again feel like they are straining to keep the shot unbroken. Though I think there’s nothing in 1917 that couldn’t have been achieved with conventional editing, I understand why Mendes chose to present his film as a single unbroken shot. It puts us right there with the two soldiers and we are as unsure as they are of what will happen next. There are two consequences of using the one-shot/single-take gimmick in a war film. 1) Whether intentional or not, the one-shot effect, which keeps the camera right behind, or in front of, or over the shoulder of the characters, along with the nature of the story makes the film feel like a video game at certain times. This is not really a fault against the film. It is more likely due to video games being influenced by movies and then filtering back into the culture, but the comparison comes to mind nonetheless. 2) I think all of the focus and talk surrounding the one-shot effect actually diverts attention away from the harrowing experience of the characters in the film. 1917 has already won several awards and praise as a technical achievement (which it certainly is). I just hope people can get past the film’s style to fully appreciate and experience the events on screen.

1917 only tangentially touches on the larger scale of the war. One character makes a background comment on the unimpressive patch of land they’ve been fighting the Germans over for years. Mendes chose not to focus on the politics of the war but instead tell the story of the enlisted men that fought in the trenches and in open fields. This movie is based in part on the experiences of Lance Corporal Alfred Mendes, Sam Mendes’s grandfather, to whom the film is dedicated. Mends co-wrote the screenplay, his only writing credit. For all the unrelenting action in 1917, the final shot makes this an emotional and affecting movie.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
zNeverSleepingFeb 8, 2020
Esse é um dos filmes que te deixam com uma interrogação na cabeça, mas não relacionada a trama, e sim a técnica.

Impressionante. O trabalho e dedicação do Sam Mendes aqui é notável. Todo o filme estava friamente conectado. A direção faz com
Esse é um dos filmes que te deixam com uma interrogação na cabeça, mas não relacionada a trama, e sim a técnica.

Impressionante. O trabalho e dedicação do Sam Mendes aqui é notável. Todo o filme estava friamente conectado. A direção faz com que a cinematografia tenha um controle total de como tudo ocorre, como se fossemos um hospedeiro e/ou todo cenário fosse uma esteira, e falando nisso, que cenografia absurda - que contribui e muito para a atmosfera. E aqui vem uma curiosidade: como foi possível planos tão longos? É como se o cenário não acabasse mais.

O roteiro tem seus méritos. Sabe bem como familiarizar o publico com historias ou alívios cômicos - bem no inicio do filme; também consegue nos fazer ficar vidrado num gênero que já se tornou maçante há um tempo - quando não aproveitado da maneira correta; e traz justamente a possibilidade de fazer um filme com pouquíssimos cortes, se assemelhando a um plano sequencia por completo. E por ultimo, devo apenas mencionar o plano sequencia que ocorre próximo ao final do filme, que é simplesmente maestral e emocionante. Ver isso num Imax faz toda a diferença!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ILikeToBreatheNov 7, 2020
Loved it. A touching story and relatively accurate historically, though I think they could have done more with the 'one continuous shot' idea.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
clem666Mar 18, 2023
Outstanding artwork. A poetic and intense story about friendship, family, death, boldness and abnegation in the context of war. The movie really shines in my opinion for its ability to give precise proportion of time to storytelling, silence,Outstanding artwork. A poetic and intense story about friendship, family, death, boldness and abnegation in the context of war. The movie really shines in my opinion for its ability to give precise proportion of time to storytelling, silence, roaring fear, moments of comradeship and plain jokes.
Terrific acting performances for both George MacKay (playing as Scholfield) and Dean-Charles Chapman (as Blake). Their interactions embellish their respective roles and manage to craft a touching bond.
Amazing work from Sam Mendes and his team for the shooting, the colours, the sound-design, the editing and the overall atmosphere. Thank you too, Thomas Newman, for this notable soundtrack. '1917' is not a film with many plots and sub-plots, in fact it doesn't tell much of anything, but it does take us into a very dark moment in the history of mankind in our modern and contemporary times. It's more a movie to live than to watch. The film clearly lacks a 'must-see' label.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
akyla2077Feb 15, 2020
Игра года и тысячелетия и десятилетия и столетия и тысячелетия
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SimonsRantsSep 16, 2020
Compelling visuals and masterful technical filmmaking from cinematography to editing to sound mixing - all fantastic (although, some of the "invisible cuts" were blatantly obvious)
The fact that it's based on Sam Mendes' grandfathers memoirs
Compelling visuals and masterful technical filmmaking from cinematography to editing to sound mixing - all fantastic (although, some of the "invisible cuts" were blatantly obvious)
The fact that it's based on Sam Mendes' grandfathers memoirs also makes it all the more compelling. But it has many drawbacks not the least of which is that the single cut style never stops feeling like a gimmick in this film - unlike in Birdman where you're absorbed into the story - so the film itself never stops quite feeling like a gimmick either.
It also suffers from a lack of having much to say as the plot is a rather basic A B C plot with no surprises or messages to make you think in the least. Just a standard story with nothing new or original to say. Now, it tells that story well but it's not particularly compelling in any way if you've seen other more masterful war movies. To call 1917 a war film may not be entirely fair or accurate either as it feels much more akin to a thriller. But even then, it's not quite thrilling enough to be a thriller so perhaps just a war drama?
It's a masterfully made film with very few technical flaws but with many, many storytelling flaws. Far from a bad film, but still almost just as far from being great - definitely good though, just unfortunately not much more than good.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
glommanOct 20, 2022
Don't get me wrong the whole one-shot camera thing is an incredibly brilliant idea and delivers a really immersive experience, but this movie honestly doesn't have much else going on besides that. It follows the same images of WWI you'veDon't get me wrong the whole one-shot camera thing is an incredibly brilliant idea and delivers a really immersive experience, but this movie honestly doesn't have much else going on besides that. It follows the same images of WWI you've probably seen dozens of times, the characters, although walking through trauma, are mostly flat. The Germans are just plain evil henchmen getting mowed down or just plain insidious whenever the chance arises (as per usual).
I really don't see how this movie is supposed to be special, once you take the incredible camera work away, it becomes a desolate wasteland of caricatures.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ChrisPaniaguaApr 20, 2021
Although it might seem like just another war plot, the "uncut" sequential shot is the originality of this film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
aukalenderFeb 13, 2022
A looker. The movie is basically a one-shot (yes I know they disguise the cuts). It is very immersive. Saw this with my mother, who, like me, does not really have a massive thing for the war movie genre. But we were both gripped. The mostlyA looker. The movie is basically a one-shot (yes I know they disguise the cuts). It is very immersive. Saw this with my mother, who, like me, does not really have a massive thing for the war movie genre. But we were both gripped. The mostly unknown lead actors delivered greatly. Same for Andrew Scott, Benedict Cumberbatch, Colin Firth and Richard Madden who jolted the movie with energy in the few scenes they were in. The story is pretty thin, but this is a movie and not a novel. It does not need a convoluted story and incredible dialogue to be compelling. Good acting, great shots, some dramatic music here and there and boom Bob's your uncle. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Diesel6401Mar 26, 2020
Excellent! Beautifully shot.
Great story. Fantastic score, although I would have had Ed Sheeran camo for Wayfaring Stranger - his version years ago was fantastic. For a fan of war films - must see!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
tarekaliJun 16, 2022
This movie is a love letter to old-school storytelling and cinematography in particular. From the opening shot to the final cut, there was only one single absolutely justified disruption in the viewpoint of the audience. End to end, thisThis movie is a love letter to old-school storytelling and cinematography in particular. From the opening shot to the final cut, there was only one single absolutely justified disruption in the viewpoint of the audience. End to end, this brutal mission was a singular journey through blasted hell scapes, lush meadows, dark caverns, and erupting fields of fire. It is truly a master class in filmmaking to seamlessly tell a story in a single cut. The mission itself is the point, where the will to live and save lives, to sacrifice for the greater good, can infect even the most nonchalant of protagonists. In turn, such sacrifice can lead to inner peace and resolution of old hurts. There are moments of utter terror where our heroes are running for their lives and complete peace where they take a moment to enjoy the miracle of life itself. But all in all, this is one unforgettable war story, told in a single sweeping vision. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
keanureveesMar 16, 2020
As someone who isn't big on war movies, I wasn't sure how I'd feel about this, and now, after I've seen it I'm still not too sure. There's a lot to like. Visually it's stunning, with the directing and cinematography (the Écoust scenes were myAs someone who isn't big on war movies, I wasn't sure how I'd feel about this, and now, after I've seen it I'm still not too sure. There's a lot to like. Visually it's stunning, with the directing and cinematography (the Écoust scenes were my favourite part of the film); I also really liked the brotherhood between the soldiers that drove the story. The story as a whole, however, felt a bit flat to me and I feel like the ending was missing...something. Again, mixed emotions, but, without a doubt, worth the trip to the cinema. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DiegoDFFeb 16, 2020
Filme incrível, com roteiro e cenas grandiosos, impecáveis. Para os brasileiros assistam legendando deu uma emoção maior em varias cenas!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ArthuuFeb 21, 2020
Impressively well directed, very atmospheric with stunning sound design and convincing play - a must watch
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
tayvoodooFeb 15, 2020
this movie was something else. the plot, the cinematography, the ambience, the score, the cast, ugh everything is perfect. also george mackay and richard madden own this b*ssy. go see 1917 on theaters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DouglasspompeuJun 10, 2020
1917 goes beyond its great achievement in cinema technique. It is poetic and will delivery a beautiful and deep message for those who care about life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
BRJacobsFeb 10, 2020
What a great film, this is an intense, heartbreaking, thrill ride of a movie from beginning to end. This is how you put the audience on the edge of their seats. Does a fantastic job of making us feel the times as they are. The characters areWhat a great film, this is an intense, heartbreaking, thrill ride of a movie from beginning to end. This is how you put the audience on the edge of their seats. Does a fantastic job of making us feel the times as they are. The characters are fun, active, and relatable. Color pallet and cinematography are all great to establish tone and message. Some scenes are profoundly unnerving in a good way. Worth everyone's time to see a glimpse of history. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Timmy121Feb 10, 2020
Если не лучший, то один из лучших фильмов которые я смотрел когда-либо, все говорят “Конечно не Хокиан Феникс, но актёрская игра не плохая”, люди, это совсем другой фильм, по вашему актёры должны играть в этом фильме Джокера, актёры играютЕсли не лучший, то один из лучших фильмов которые я смотрел когда-либо, все говорят “Конечно не Хокиан Феникс, но актёрская игра не плохая”, люди, это совсем другой фильм, по вашему актёры должны играть в этом фильме Джокера, актёры играют охуенно, даже когда один из них умирает, а другой не плачет, но на его лице больше чем слёзы, ты чувствуеш их игру Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
eutohiusFeb 12, 2020
This movie is definitely a must-see. Dickins' work is as stunning as always. A pure pleasure to an eye.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
KatanaVoidFeb 13, 2020
1917 has one of the best photographies and editing that Hollywood has ever seen, but Sam Mendes doesn't make a good plot or an interesting debate about WW1 and its surroundings, instead, he makes a beautiful and technically impeccable movie,1917 has one of the best photographies and editing that Hollywood has ever seen, but Sam Mendes doesn't make a good plot or an interesting debate about WW1 and its surroundings, instead, he makes a beautiful and technically impeccable movie, but with an almost unimportant story. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
NiallHayesFeb 15, 2020
This is the best war movie Ive seen for a long time. It takes over an hour for a bullet to even be fired but i was on the edge of my seat the while time. The one shot style of the movie keeps you grounded and there with them for the entireThis is the best war movie Ive seen for a long time. It takes over an hour for a bullet to even be fired but i was on the edge of my seat the while time. The one shot style of the movie keeps you grounded and there with them for the entire journey. Its very impressive to experience. Shame it missed out on the best picture award. Wouldve been a well deserved win Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThePeruvianPostFeb 18, 2020
"Director Sam Mendes employs distinctive but extraordinary shots in the first person during the two-hour footage, which makes the production work in many different ways. Although it sometimes results too shaky, it is thanks to George MacKay"Director Sam Mendes employs distinctive but extraordinary shots in the first person during the two-hour footage, which makes the production work in many different ways. Although it sometimes results too shaky, it is thanks to George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman's performances that 1917 preserves both sombre but optimistic tones throughout the montage. In short, this is an exceptional approach to memorialise the hundredth anniversary of the end of the First World War".
...
We are somewhere in France during the Trench Warfare [1915 - 1917] with a depleted British Army; the atmosphere, alongside with the dialogues, can define by itself how was life at the front: scarce water and food, despair between soldiers to go home, endless weapons and corpses scattered on the floor, and so forth. Corporals Blake and Schofield are told to attain a severe/impossible mission despite not having any reinforcements. Before achieving this goal in sending General MacKenzie [Bennedict Cumberbatch] the infamous fallback letter, both privates must penetrate the frightful No Man's Land and experience horrendous life-and-death encounters in many places.
...
Regardless of the silent second half, the absence of preeminent performers and the woozy experience of watching the film in one sole perspective director Sam Mendes and executive producers deliver an eloquent portrayal about surprising facts of the four-year global conflict. For example, both soldiers are bewildered by the superiority of the German trenches in proportions and in quality considering that historically they were far better equipped than the Allied ones which allow the audience the opportunity of a lifetime to analyse the condition millions of innocent citizens were facing. The result improves with some accurate shots at landscapes, underground warfare channels, entire villages pulverised, etcetera. I must acknowledge the last fifteen minutes of the film; it has been a long time since I spotted such an imposing ending. Countless emotions appear regardless of having reached the climax. What a masterpiece ladies and gentlemen!
...
What amazes me the most is that despite being a World War film, 1917 does not give the impression in duplicating the ordinary details of previous same-genre releases such as Hacksaw Ridge [2017]. Once Mr Gibson introduced a brief biography of Desmond Doss [the main character] he began recording some ultraviolent scenes as though you were spotting the most savage state of humankind. As an alternative, 1917 delivers some innovative procedures in creating a war film without increasing the brutal strength of instant classics as Saving Private Ryan.
...
Congratulations!
...
[80/100]
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews