Metascore
79

Generally favorable reviews - based on 44 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 35 out of 44
  2. Negative: 0 out of 44
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Edge Magazine
    70
    While Snowblind never truly escapes the feeling of being a well-dressed, derivative run'n'gun shooter, it never fails to get the running and gunning right, and in that respect, at least, it's a sound success. [March 2005, p.86]
  2. Boomtown
    70
    There are times you want to be challenged, made to think, swept away by something unique and brilliant – and there are times where you just want to kick back and be entertained. For the latter, step up Project: Snowblind.
  3. 70
    Using the various bio-augmentations is a hoot (one makes you invulnerable, another slows down time, etc.) Unfortunately, the developers were damn stingy with the save points, which means you'll be replaying some levels more times than you'd like.
  4. 70
    Easily forgotten, Project: Snowblind delivers on the promise of an FPS game and nothing more. Were it the only option, it would be instantly snatched up; however in a crowded market, there's no reason to settle for "average" when you could be playing "great."
  5. It seems content simply toying with features found in other first-person shooters and doesn't really go the distance with any of them. The result is a decent if predictable shooter saved by a beefy online component. It might be inspired, but that doesn't make it inspirational.
  6. TotalGames.net
    66
    A dumbed down first-person shooter designed specifically for the PS2, which isn't equipped to run the more exciting elements of the Deus Ex universe. The result is a bland shooting experience that may as well run under the title of 'Generic Game With Fancy Guns' - a real shame when the potential to create something truly different was handed to the developer on a plate by Eidos.
  7. 50
    While the main ingredients are all there, the final product certainly feels less than the sum of its parts, resulting in a distinctly hollow-feeling and average game.
  8. games(TM)
    50
    Unfortunately, the difference between what Crystal Dynamics wanted to do with Snowblind and the finished product is a crevasse that good intentions fall well short of bridging, leaving the game lying in a Wile E. Coyote-style could of dust at the bottom. [March 2005, p.110]
  9. While the kind of run-and-gun gameplay Snowblind strongly promotes may offer a fun experience for some, I personally feel that the game has little to offer beyond a depressingly average experience, marred further by a number of gameplay and interface problems, as well as multiplayer support that feels entirely half-assed.

Awards & Rankings

55
77
#77 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2005
77
#77 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2005
User Score
7.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 14 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 14
  2. Negative: 2 out of 14
  1. Oct 19, 2020
    8
    I just can´t figure out why Project: Snowblind was just overlooked. It has everything a good shooter needs to convince. Beautiful graphics,I just can´t figure out why Project: Snowblind was just overlooked. It has everything a good shooter needs to convince. Beautiful graphics, great sound and a badass story and gameplay. Even the cinematics are hollywoodesque. Maybe the competition was too hard in the futuristic FPS genre regarding the Halo series. But this game is really worth a look! Full Review »
  2. RichardS.
    Jul 17, 2006
    8
    "It's no Halo 2." True. It's better. Halo 2 is the most over-rated game of all time: a truely awful game that I can't bear to "It's no Halo 2." True. It's better. Halo 2 is the most over-rated game of all time: a truely awful game that I can't bear to play (the first 2 levels alone should indicate how dire it all is) and Halo 1 is my all-time fave. PS is nothing like Halo 1 or 2 - it is a straight action game, run and gun, loads of weapons, full on action and tremendous fun. There are almost too many weapons, but they are all cool - the pistol fires rockets, the shotgun fires exploding pellets etc. Great controls and HUDs. The graphics are okay - I would have preferred a more techy sci-fi feel liek Blade Runner, but still nice. The cut scenes are a bit dodgy - mouth mechanics are poor, but don't hurt at all. Lots of variety - controlling robots, driving armoured cars, sneaking around vents etc. Not as good as Halo 1, Half-Life 2, Riddick or Oddworld: Strangers Wrath, but still a great laugh and since I only paid NZ$20 brilliant value. Full Review »
  3. ApocalypseBrown
    Sep 21, 2005
    7
    Entertaining single player with great weaponery, which makes you go on a power trip like mr bush! What drags the score down is no co-op, Entertaining single player with great weaponery, which makes you go on a power trip like mr bush! What drags the score down is no co-op, online is shocking and the fact that it has more bugs than what were in sadams office! A shame really but still way better than halo 2 single player. Full Review »