Gun
Xbox- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Nov 8, 2005
- Also On: PC, PlayStation 2, Xbox 360
Buy Now
- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Born on the Playstation 2, and it looks it. Muddy Textures, low detail. The large gameworld is technically impressive though.
-
The experience just doesn't last long enough to be savored. Gun's main story missions are exciting, but the main plot is over so quickly that the whole thing just ends up feeling rushed, and the various side missions aren't compelling enough to hold your interest after the end credits roll.
-
The majority of the game is one long gunfight, shifting between a traditional free-looking aim to lock-on, slow-mo shooting. It's good stuff, if you don't mind your foes acting like targets in a carnival game.
-
If you want to compare GUN to GTA, it's fair to say that it doesn't reach the level of enjoyment found in the GTA games mainly because the missions push you forward a little too much and you don't get the chance to explore as much as you might want to do.
-
Gun is a fun little game of Cowboys and Indians worth checking out if you're a fan of this era, but don't expect more than a few hours of gameplay.
-
Gun is the best Wild West game to date but it is a low-down dirty shame that developers Neversoft didn't apply the same comprehensive approach to the design work as they did to the soundtrack, voice casting and the plot.
-
Activities such as poker tournaments, capturing felons, gold mining, animal herding and hunting provide variety but their appeal is short-lived.
-
You'll enjoy the gunplay, you'll probably be numbed by the slo-mo gunplay repetition, and then see it through anyway because it's all quite undemanding fun with a decent story. On horseback. Just don't expect Gun to change the world. It really is just "True Crime in the Wild West."
-
AceGamezIt has interesting features and plenty of action and intense shootouts to keep you entertained (especially when you get your grubby hands on the gatling gun) but between these parts you're left wandering around a dull environment with very little to keep you occupied.
-
While the game is impressive in many ways, it ultimately comes up a little short.
-
Average at best. The great voice acting and the solid graphics are just not enough to keep the game afloat. Somewhat shoddy controls and the lack of depth just drag this title down too much.
-
Edge MagazineWhy roam freely (when the game lets you, which is by no means always) when all that's out there to find is an empty trek between jarring episodes of production-line gaming? [Christmas 2005, p.105]
-
games(TM)Far too generic to be considered anything other than average. [Christmas 2005, p.114]
Awards & Rankings
|
51
|
|
|
26
|
#26 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2005
|
|
44
|
#44 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2005
|
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 21 out of 33
-
Mixed: 7 out of 33
-
Negative: 5 out of 33
-
ConstantineH.Dec 21, 2006
-
RoundMoonSep 10, 2006
-
[Anonymous]Aug 16, 2006