User Score
2.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 45 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 45
  2. Negative: 37 out of 45
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Masochist
    Feb 13, 2007
    10
    This game is cheap enough to buy just to enjoy how utterly awful it is. I laughed until I cried. It's almost worth the money just because of that.
  2. SilentRogue
    May 27, 2004
    10
    Best xbox game to date. Forget Riddick or SplinterCell's graphics this game totally destroys them in graphics. It's a true showcase title and the gameplay is revolutionary!! Drake sets the standard. A must buy A++
  3. DrakeRockslikehell
    Oct 23, 2004
    10
    This game ROcks its the best game ever made no question.
  4. DonK.
    Dec 22, 2003
    10
    This is by far the greatest game ever created. Keep in mind I'm a blind def mute.
  5. Jun 3, 2022
    10
    this game was pretty good,you know why? it was fixed it has great graphics and great controls and even the guns are way to powerful right now.

Awards & Rankings

13
#13 Most Discussed Xbox Game of 2003
7
#7 Most Shared Xbox Game of 2003
Metascore
22

Generally unfavorable reviews - based on 16 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 0 out of 16
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 16
  3. Negative: 16 out of 16
  1. Xbox Nation Magazine
    30
    The camera alone is enough to condemn Drake to the eigth circle of gaming hell. [Dec/Jan 2004, p.90]
  2. Cheat Code Central
    40
    The sad part is that there are just too many problems that were not fixed before the release. The main thing is the controls of the game itself... It's a game with some cool gimmicks that try to hide a poorly made game.
  3. Official Xbox Magazine
    30
    Even at $20 it's worse than dull - it's unoriginal. When the loading screen is prettier than anything in the game, then you know you've got problems. [Jan 2004, p.70]