User Score
8.8

Generally favorable reviews- based on 347 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Negative: 27 out of 347
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Dec 18, 2022
    0
    Probably the worst game I've ever played. The graphics come from 2000s, gameplay is bad, animations & physics are hilarious, horse riding is awfull, NPCs are brain-dead, map is full of copy-paste etc.

    Wokepunk 77 is much better than this dialogue simulator. What a shame...
  2. Mar 14, 2023
    0
    Don't think for a second I'm done criticizing your game CDPR. How can I forget the obvious downgrade in graphics this garbage had. If this were Ubisoft, we all know how that narrative would've went. Speaking of Ubisoft, it's funny when CDPR fans make fun of Ubisoft physics. Do they not pay attention to CDPR physics? Those physics are even worse than Ubisoft. The Gwent minigame is horrible.Don't think for a second I'm done criticizing your game CDPR. How can I forget the obvious downgrade in graphics this garbage had. If this were Ubisoft, we all know how that narrative would've went. Speaking of Ubisoft, it's funny when CDPR fans make fun of Ubisoft physics. Do they not pay attention to CDPR physics? Those physics are even worse than Ubisoft. The Gwent minigame is horrible. The characters don't even use the cards in real-time. Red Dead Redemption 1 is from 2010 in a 360/PS3 console, and the characters actually hold the cards in real-time. That's embarrassing and it just goes to show how cheap and lazy these greedy developers are.

    For a game made by "consumer friendly" developers, they sure did a fantastic job at allowing me to play with friends. Oh that's right, there is no multiplayer. The greedy developers had the audacity to slap a $60 price tag at launch for only half of the game. It's easy to brag about no microtransactions when these lazy and greedy developers only worked on half the game. I guarantee you their future games with online multiplayer will have MTX. Speaking of which, this game did technically have microtransactions. Those story DLCs were the MTX. If CDPR were truly the good guys, then they would've gave us the complete game at the start rather than joining the greedy trend of releasing an incomplete game for $60, only to complete it with paid DLC 1 year later. What's laughable is that this practice gets praised by gamers and journalists, and then they have a surprised Pikachu face when their beloved developers become even greedier. The DLCs are now free, but that should've been the case in the beginning. I don't recommend this boring game at all.
    Expand
Metascore
94

Universal acclaim - based on 7 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 7 out of 7
  2. Mixed: 0 out of 7
  3. Negative: 0 out of 7
  1. Jan 3, 2023
    90
    The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt was already one of the best games of all-time, but now the Complete Edition has cemented that legacy and will ensure that it is a game which is talked about for many more years to come.
  2. Dec 19, 2022
    90
    The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Complete Edition joins the current generation in style. To be honest this is the best graphics work ever implemented and is worth admiring with all the technical improvements made with raytracing. In addition, the new content of the Netflix series included in the game is a great detail.
  3. Dec 14, 2022
    95
    The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is a must play title for any gamer, and the next gen upgrade is an excellent excuse to jump back into the bleak monster ridden world.