Call of Duty: WWII

 Xbox One
User Score
5.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 520 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 193 out of 520
  2. Mixed: 89 out of 520
  3. Negative: 238 out of 520
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Xbox_Alive
    Jan 2, 2018
    9
    I was actually quite a fan of Infinite Warfare and I found it to be a pleasant change in the Call of Duty series, but at times I must admit that it did miss a certain something. Thankfully Call of Duty: WWII brings that certain something back to the series and I must admit that this is one of the best Call of Duty’s I’ve played in years. The boots on ground combat is back and it’sI was actually quite a fan of Infinite Warfare and I found it to be a pleasant change in the Call of Duty series, but at times I must admit that it did miss a certain something. Thankfully Call of Duty: WWII brings that certain something back to the series and I must admit that this is one of the best Call of Duty’s I’ve played in years. The boots on ground combat is back and it’s addictive as ever and the main reason for that is because it’s exciting throughout. Another reason why it’s so enjoyable is because of the improved gunplay, which I found to be more precise and responsive than it was in Infinite Warfare. Without a doubt this game is packed to the brim with content and they’ve even included some new modes, which by the way are brilliant and a great addition to the franchise. Multiplayer also has a lot of content and once again it’s addictive as ever, and the best thing is that I’ve suffered with no problems online to date. If you’re not a massive fan of multiplayer then you will be pleased to know that the game offers you a very good single player campaign. The campaign has been done really well and it really gives you an insight into some of the events that happened in WWII, I will say however that I would have liked a bit more variety when it came to the missions. The presentation side of the game is absolutely fantastic. Visually the game looks superb the whole way through and the voice actors really made the game even more of an immersive and enjoyable experience. At the end of the day fans of the Call of Duty series will be extremely pleased with the new addition to the genre, and I must applaud the amount of effort that has gone into Call of Duty: WWII. Without a doubt it’s clear that the developers/publishers have listened to fans of the series and tried to improve every key area, and the best thing is that these improvements have created one of the best Call of Duty game’s in years. Call of Duty: WWII has in my opinion made the series relevant again and I can’t recommend it enough.… Expand
  2. yazman
    Dec 3, 2017
    2
    What a dissapointment, this is it COD needs a new engine ASAP, for me personally i am done with the franchise. COD WW2 is so weak in so many fronts i dont know where to start. Id say the campaign is the only thing id save here. Plot is solid in comparison to previous games and overall you underatand what you are doing. But we all know that the bread and butter here is the multiplayer andWhat a dissapointment, this is it COD needs a new engine ASAP, for me personally i am done with the franchise. COD WW2 is so weak in so many fronts i dont know where to start. Id say the campaign is the only thing id save here. Plot is solid in comparison to previous games and overall you underatand what you are doing. But we all know that the bread and butter here is the multiplayer and that one is , well just a mess for starters the game looks HORRIBLE i really dont understand how they keep using this ancient engine and then mask it with huge advertising campaigns and pre-rendered footage. These maps are disastrous, so small i dont even understand why they include scope snipers. Game physics are so poor or non existent weapons feel toyish and the pace of the game is just off for the ww2 setting maybe too fast. I am really dissapointed i feel sorry for sledgehammer cuz they put their best into it but again the games looks from last gen big time.… Expand
  3. GaldinoKohler
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    Who cares about campaign? I don't. It might be good or not. We buy COD because we get to play the online multiplayer. Which seems to be awesome this time. No more jetpacking, no more people flying in the sky. But there is a caveat: Matchmaking is not functional. That's it. Totally bugged. 
    I've waited 20 minutes trying everything I could to get one match. Then I've entered in a game in    Who cares about campaign? I don't. It might be good or not. We buy COD because we get to play the online multiplayer. Which seems to be awesome this time. No more jetpacking, no more people flying in the sky. But there is a caveat: Matchmaking is not functional. That's it. Totally bugged. 
    I've waited 20 minutes trying everything I could to get one match. Then I've entered in a game in progress in a team being stomped.
    This is jut not fun at all... Hard-worked money throwed in a trash bin, that's how I feel. 
    By the way, I have a good cabled connection, up-to-date router and all that. Brazil, Xbox One here. I feel other platforms are also affected.
    Feels really bad.    … Expand
  4. Bruno1943
    Nov 11, 2017
    4
    After the sophistication of previous games the recent WW2 is a significant disappointment. Restricted playing field, less than believable characters and generally second rate graphics. Also, way too short for the price. I recall that even the old 'World at War' had a more usable playing field and compared to (EG) Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (which in my opinion is a classic!) thisAfter the sophistication of previous games the recent WW2 is a significant disappointment. Restricted playing field, less than believable characters and generally second rate graphics. Also, way too short for the price. I recall that even the old 'World at War' had a more usable playing field and compared to (EG) Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (which in my opinion is a classic!) this product is very second rate. A great disappointment! and whichever team was responsible for this one needs a wake-up call.… Expand
  5. discman
    Nov 13, 2017
    4
    The setting is "new" but it's still a modern CoD. The campaign is actually much better than the last games but the multiplayer is still not classic CoD. This doesn't have to be a bad thing if you like it but the developers always said "classic CoD" so I expected it and was disappointed.
  6. nate024
    Nov 14, 2017
    3
    Quick summary: The game is a bug-ridden disaster almost 2 weeks after launch. HQ, one of the main selling points of the game, is still disabled. The lobbies are very unstable, and you will constantly have to back out and close the app when your party gets separated. Zombies is fun if that is your thing, as it is very similar to past installments. And lastly campaign, is very forgettable.Quick summary: The game is a bug-ridden disaster almost 2 weeks after launch. HQ, one of the main selling points of the game, is still disabled. The lobbies are very unstable, and you will constantly have to back out and close the app when your party gets separated. Zombies is fun if that is your thing, as it is very similar to past installments. And lastly campaign, is very forgettable. The epic scale and theater of war in WW2 is nowhere found as there are essentially 4 main characters that you don't care about. You go from shooting gallery to shooting gallery only for it to just.... end.

    I was gonna write a more in depth review, but I dont think the game deserves it in its current state. Multiplayer is in shambles. As I mentioned above, playing with friends is broken. Lag compensation is broken, making firefights just a dice roll more than anything else. Only 9 maps?! The game in general is lacking any sort of polish or thought and the whole came gives off a strong vibe that it was rushed out the door. I don't believe for a second that this is what 3 years of development produces. Between the broken UI, and the broken netcode, this game is an insult to any CoD multiplayer fan. Just wait till Black Friday, or wait another few months until patches come out to make this even remotely resemble a $60 game.    … Expand
  7. highbynine
    Nov 21, 2017
    1
    Very disappointed in this game. I guess I missed the info. But no campaign coop?? You're telling me I can't storm the beaches of Normandy with friends? Extremely disappointing!!
  8. skidzilla
    Mar 23, 2018
    1
    this game is crap utter crap, like for them to give this game a 80 makes me wonder whom is on the take ....
  9. Wildghost68
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    This game over all was pretty bad i mean come on the french resistance was so cringe worthy. Where the campaign ended was just dumb as all he** . Zombies was OK i guess and multiply player is so boring it isn't even funny. If you want to play with some random people online you will almost never find a match and even if you do your going to get kicked off the game around round 10-12. CodThis game over all was pretty bad i mean come on the french resistance was so cringe worthy. Where the campaign ended was just dumb as all he** . Zombies was OK i guess and multiply player is so boring it isn't even funny. If you want to play with some random people online you will almost never find a match and even if you do your going to get kicked off the game around round 10-12. Cod Get your SJW BS out of are dang games.… Expand
  10. CodGod
    Nov 14, 2017
    2
    This has to be one of the worst CODs ever. Everyone knows the launch was a complete embarrassment to Call of Duty but it's even worse than that. First of all they should be even more embarrassed to legit steal headquarters from Destiny. I mean a complete and 100% rip off. And it is not good. Then the menus are absolutely awful. Why does it take seven button presses to leave a game? 7! AndThis has to be one of the worst CODs ever. Everyone knows the launch was a complete embarrassment to Call of Duty but it's even worse than that. First of all they should be even more embarrassed to legit steal headquarters from Destiny. I mean a complete and 100% rip off. And it is not good. Then the menus are absolutely awful. Why does it take seven button presses to leave a game? 7! And why when I am in the lobby am I looking at a bunch of soldiers standing around. I canno't tell who is in a party or not. Please just show me a list of players in the lobby and the teams they are on before the match starts. Now about the create a class system. Why would you try to replace the pick 10 system. It literally is the gold standard. A near perfect system. Yet leave it to sledgehammer to kill a good thing. Why can't I put a suppressor on my AR? It makes no sense. And why when I pick a gun up that a guy was using that had a suppressor on it does it magically not have the suppressor anymore? You can no longer have stock and ghost on the same class because of this archaic system. To further that, why is stock a perk and not a gun attachment...There are so so many things wrong with this game. No dedicated servers, terrible connectivity, slowest gameplays ever. They reduced the TDM to 75 kills and still it's rare to get 75 kills in a match. Huge huge miss by activision and sledgehammer on this one.… Expand
  11. martinsll
    Nov 28, 2017
    4
    Não comprem este jogo, se estão procurando um jogo de guerra de verdade Battlefiled ou Wolfstein. As armas parecem de brinquedo, o sistema de acampamento (multiplayer) é tão confuso que até assusta. Missões e diálogos manjados, horrível !
  12. Roblaw
    Dec 8, 2017
    3
    The campaign is fairly engaging, but where the game really falls flat is the multiplayer. Maps are dull and one-dimensional, and prone to failed finishing (can't jump on a two foot ledge - walls are uniformly flat. The game is built for the "run and gun" mindless shooter crowd, with very little nuance or strategy. The pinnacle, really was, Ghosts, and it's been a sad effort since then.The campaign is fairly engaging, but where the game really falls flat is the multiplayer. Maps are dull and one-dimensional, and prone to failed finishing (can't jump on a two foot ledge - walls are uniformly flat. The game is built for the "run and gun" mindless shooter crowd, with very little nuance or strategy. The pinnacle, really was, Ghosts, and it's been a sad effort since then. Probably my last COD purchase.… Expand
  13. Baldpubis
    Dec 12, 2017
    0
    Remember the first 27 times they made this exact same game? Yeah. Those were great. Shooting people in the face and watching their blood squirt across the screen almost never gets old. But then it does. And now it is. Yawn.
  14. Davis5018
    Dec 16, 2017
    0
    Let me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hopeLet me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hope sledgehammer reads this. Don't waste your money. I'd rather play hacked lobbies on MW2 than play COD ww2 ever again in my life. Can't believe I wasted 60 dollars on this piece of crap game. I say again, don't waste your money on this garbage game.… Expand
  15. Xefan
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game has everything wrong with it that Call of Duty has had wrong with it since 2007, the difference is, it was acceptable then, but technology has moved on.

    The story is targeted entirely at the American audience and as a result entirely re-writes history and is grossly inaccurate almost to the point of being offensive - certainly so to anyone that actually fought in the war, what    This game has everything wrong with it that Call of Duty has had wrong with it since 2007, the difference is, it was acceptable then, but technology has moved on.

    The story is targeted entirely at the American audience and as a result entirely re-writes history and is grossly inaccurate almost to the point of being offensive - certainly so to anyone that actually fought in the war, what few of them there are left in the world for Activision to massively insult by writing their contribution out of history.

    Thus even outside of the non-working servers, the dated gameplay, the abysmal AI, the obscure fluctuations in difficulty, there is a fundamental problem in that even the single player storyline just isn't engaging simply because it's a load of functional nonsense passed off as fact.

    Activision could learn a lot from EA, whilst Battlefield 1 wasn't overly historically accurate in terms of weaponry, it's focus on the disparate storylines across the War was incredibly respectful to the countless sides who fought in it, which is far better than this insult that Activision have produced.

    This is a game from a different era, outdated technology, outdated gameplay, and outdated American exceptionalism that's well past it's sell-by date.    … Expand
  16. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  17. FerPSX
    Nov 7, 2017
    2
    If SH fixes their game I will change the score.
    The game is broken, it have several issues, like input lag, hit detection, servers... and it have minor issues like emotes (the worst emotes in the past 4yrs) menus, time to wait between matches.
    I can’t believe all the bad critics to CoD IW from the CoD community (haters doesn’t count, they hate every CoD), infinity Ward made a better    If SH fixes their game I will change the score.
    The game is broken, it have several issues, like input lag, hit detection, servers... and it have minor issues like emotes (the worst emotes in the past 4yrs) menus, time to wait between matches.
    I can’t believe all the bad critics to CoD IW from the CoD community (haters doesn’t count, they hate every CoD), infinity Ward made a better game than CoD WWII, at least a complete game.    … Expand
  18. LabiusMaximus
    Nov 12, 2017
    2
    Never thought I'd see the day when the gaming critics end up bought and paid for. Here we are. Over and over the critics giving a high score to crap games with an A+ in champagne left politics. Saving a Jewess from the SS for example. Since when was this anyone's COD? I'd rather save my cash. Has the franchise been bought enough to vitiate the original game into a political football forNever thought I'd see the day when the gaming critics end up bought and paid for. Here we are. Over and over the critics giving a high score to crap games with an A+ in champagne left politics. Saving a Jewess from the SS for example. Since when was this anyone's COD? I'd rather save my cash. Has the franchise been bought enough to vitiate the original game into a political football for people who can't help themselves? Are you that bloody minded to put your politics supraordinate to the heart of a game, which is gaming, to the point where the game sucks? Here we also have historical rewriting to be more PC across the board. The Nazis made no bones about enslaving and killing off the Untermensch, with nazi peasant soldiers each allocated 120 hectares of the conquered lands in Generalplanost. Their blood and soul ethos. You won't see it here in this fanciful PC schmaltz hoping for end user$$$. Equally, the Jewish Bolsheviks fomented civil discord in a hellish way in Germany and not only Germany. The Germans had their strong views and so did the Jewish Marxists of the Soviet Nomenklatura and Comintern. Full on war was the outcome. As for us, good gaming was always irreverent and above all about gaming, amplifying these historical absurdities, not cucking, no kowtow. Amplifying! It needs to said three times. Games are about gaming, ie competition, which is totally nonPC! This is another example of sequels in the ever more oppressive framework we all live in. What a shame. Looks like the only highlights this year are racing games. Hope RDR doesn't take a turn to the left, but not holding my breath after "that" scene in zombie mode. Too much time spent on perfecting PC and much less on the game itself, as per other reviews. So sad as I was really looking forward to this, after playing the first COD and all of them before the rubbish futurist ones.… Expand
  19. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that dont fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  20. AngryShark92
    Nov 12, 2017
    4
    Call of Duty, oh boy. This series has been around for nearly 15 years, and year after year they release a new instalment that sells solely based on hype. I was idiotic enough to buy into the hype because of my love for COD 2 and WAW, and now I obviously regret it.

    Basically, this COD was meant to be a nod to the games of old with a bs tagline of "Get your old squad back together". Well,    Call of Duty, oh boy. This series has been around for nearly 15 years, and year after year they release a new instalment that sells solely based on hype. I was idiotic enough to buy into the hype because of my love for COD 2 and WAW, and now I obviously regret it.

    Basically, this COD was meant to be a nod to the games of old with a bs tagline of "Get your old squad back together". Well, I did, and while some think the game is passable and others would give this a zero, 4 is where I stand. I have played the series since Call of Duty 2 on Xbox 360 back in 05, and I believe I have just grown tired of the same formula, on top of the fact that this game is absolutely horrible. My review is more focused on the Multiplayer as it is the primary focus.

    Positives:

    - Campaign is great looking and very cinematic
    - WWII setting is nice to see again in both SP & MP
    - Headquarters setup for pre-game is a unique touch and offers some variety
    - Boots on the ground, no robots and jetpacks

    Negatives (Primarily in MP):

    - Cinematic campaigns do not equal fun
    - Nothing we have not seen before
    - Abysmal map design (3 main lanes, funnelled into the middle)
    - SMG focused CQB combat, not much variety for battles
    - No bolt action rifles without a scope? In a WWII based game? Is this a joke? (For Multiplayer)
    - Micro-transaction push with useless loot crates (near ubiquitous these days)
    - Forget about team focused gameplay (war mode is not as good as promised)
    - Spawning and spawn zones don't flip as much as they should, too easy to trap or be trapped
    - Forced perk system (divisions), does not allow you to mix and match perks to your liking as easily as previous entries

    Not even gonna bother commenting on nazi zombies since it really does not change much and is usually pretty consistent in its ability to create chaotic fun and endless nights with friends. I am sure it does its job properly as its standalone mode, which I would technically deem a positive.

    This game feels way too much like a re-skin, and less like a new and innovative AAA product (Yes, I know I should never expect COD and innovation to be mentioned in the same sentence nowadays). Alongside this, I have to mention that the servers for this game have been terrible as well, I did not want to mention it in the negatives as I am sure that it will be corrected soon.

    Also, for the love of gaming, I do not know why Swastikas have to be removed from a game that is being released outside of Germany? It was part of WWII, gaming is not a place for sensitive SJWs to modify every aspect to their liking. The soldier configurations and officers fall in this category as well. A black woman on the front lines for the reich? Stop. Historical accuracy is important for these types of games IMO, and as great looking as the campaign may be, why are german soldiers wielding PPSH (Russian) sub machine guns in D-Day bunkers? The social justice aspect has become so intrusive in video games that its sad. I do not care who it offends, this has to be part of the review. If you want a fake and dishonest review about these games, go watch your favourite YouTuber or check your favourite game review site who both get paid to say good things about the product. AAA products are dying in the quality department with things like this and micro-transactions and nobody says or does anything about it.

    Overall, you just cannot find enough positive things in this game to truly override the negatives, and for that reason, I end up giving this game a 4 or 40%, because while it is nice to see a return to boots on the ground and a WWII setting, the abysmal map design, exceptionally poor balancing, toxic community, lack of weaponry, and bad game mechanics just make this game a disaster that is relying on hype for a return to the old style of COD many of us miss. Take a pass on this one, those days are long gone.    … Expand
  21. PowerGamer
    Nov 9, 2017
    4
    Quite simply if the bugs don't kill you than the script kiddie hack buyers will.
    Game crashes a lot, has lame bugs like having to reset your weapons every round, etc., and still not fixed a week later.
    Then apparently bored of the game, the hacks started showing up in full force a week after launch. You watch the kill cam and they obviously see where you are, do constant head shots and    Quite simply if the bugs don't kill you than the script kiddie hack buyers will.
    Game crashes a lot, has lame bugs like having to reset your weapons every round, etc., and still not fixed a week later.
    Then apparently bored of the game, the hacks started showing up in full force a week after launch.
    You watch the kill cam and they obviously see where you are, do constant head shots and have 15 kills and 0 deaths.
    And how is it a level 4 mastered the game with out even leveling yet. But I'm sure if you look tomorrow they'll be easily level 50 at their hack rates.
    Where is the anti-cheat?

    Finally the solo mission is nothing special. Pretty boring. Adds nothing new.

    I should have known to wait awhile for reviews first..    … Expand
  22. wonderwu
    Nov 12, 2017
    0
    This is by far the worst game to ever be released under the "Call of Duty" franchise. The actual gameplay itself is not terrible, but all of the bugs, glitches, and errors make it horrendous. They had a beta for this game, but clearly didn't try to use the information gathered from it to better the game, because it has most of the exact same problems. At launch, no one in America couldThis is by far the worst game to ever be released under the "Call of Duty" franchise. The actual gameplay itself is not terrible, but all of the bugs, glitches, and errors make it horrendous. They had a beta for this game, but clearly didn't try to use the information gathered from it to better the game, because it has most of the exact same problems. At launch, no one in America could play for the first 2 hours. Now a week later, they've released their first "patch" for the game, and screwed that up as well. Now the game has major lag and hit detection problems. I have spent most of my day trying to complete a special order, of winning one of each game type in multiplayer, but it has not gone well. Every single time I win a game of Capture the Flag, it kicks me out and doesn't award me with any EXP or the win towards the order. Though, if I lose the game, it will count. Sledgehammer Games should be ashamed to release this slop, and Activision should be embarrassed to release this under their moniker. I, for one, will never be purchasing another Call of Duty game if they can't even keep their own standards high.… Expand
  23. Lochie
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    As an Australian it is now 57 hours since I purchased this game. I can't play online at all with a fibre connection. I will not praise a single player campaign of 5 hours, that standard should've never become acceptable. I have stayed away from CoD for a while, returning with high hopes. I'll try and get a refund today.
  24. Chiefaholic9
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Multiplayer server issues galore. Headquarters menu system is a bust. Supply drops don't work. End of match glitches that make the game freeze and force you to restart. And that's if you're lucky enough to be able to connect to Xbox live at all. Poor launch.
  25. Fragnum24
    Nov 6, 2017
    1
    You can tell they tried, but this has to be the final nail in this coffin? I really tried to enjoy it but the whole game seems flacid and devoid of anything that embraces you as a gamer.
    I gave my copy to my 10 year old cousin and he absolutely hates it too.
    TL;DR - bought once, already had two owners, both owners wanted it out of the house asap.
  26. dchoover1987
    Nov 12, 2017
    1
    The game is a joke. It is HORRIBLY unbalanced. It's just like how Infinity Ward made MW2, the best CoD to date, but they also made Infinite Warfare.....the worst CoD to date, and one of the worst FPS ever made. Same company....two completely different game balance and performace presentations. Sledgehammer is the same thing. They made Advanced Warfare....one of my 3 favorite CoD (the otherThe game is a joke. It is HORRIBLY unbalanced. It's just like how Infinity Ward made MW2, the best CoD to date, but they also made Infinite Warfare.....the worst CoD to date, and one of the worst FPS ever made. Same company....two completely different game balance and performace presentations. Sledgehammer is the same thing. They made Advanced Warfare....one of my 3 favorite CoD (the other two MW2 and BLOPS3)....then they made this travesty of a game. It's as bad as Ghosts and IW.

    I sat behind someone in a Dom match....not 8 feet from them, with the Type 100....emptied the ENTIRE CLIP into them, 8 feet......8.....feet, and got 2 hit markers. 2.....2 hit markers.

    This game needs to be fixed asap. The PVP is just unbalanced. There is no other work for it. This game sucks in its current build. Please fix it. Please.....I want this game to be good so bad. My K/D is a 0.78 and it is 100% from how bad this game performs.

    And dont even gir me stsrted on the terrible spawn points. COD has had bad spawn poij issues for years....but this takes the cake. I've watched enemies appear dead in front of me out of thin air and kill me. (They dont appear on the ground, they fall from about 7 feet up and shoot you). Real hard to shoot people who appear right in front of you unkess you have suoer human reflexes.

    The only reason this is getting such a high score is because Activision PAID for the good reviews. Notice the majority of actual user reviews are negative but the review site reviews are positive? Yeah.....goes to show you how unreliable paid reviewers are. Don't listen to that stuff......this game is a 1, at best...and thats just because I like the timeline and the guns...    … Expand
  27. mechroblaster
    Nov 7, 2017
    8
    This is the first CoD game I've purchased in years and I'm happy with the purchase.

    Pros: Really enjoying the WWII campaign and story. The MP is a lot of fun with a variety of modes. War mode is especially fun. The graphics, sound and feel of the game are of great quality. Cons: With only 9 MP maps and 3 War mode maps it leaves a lot to be desired with map variety for a base    This is the first CoD game I've purchased in years and I'm happy with the purchase.

    Pros:

    Really enjoying the WWII campaign and story. The MP is a lot of fun with a variety of modes. War mode is especially fun. The graphics, sound and feel of the game are of great quality.

    Cons:

    With only 9 MP maps and 3 War mode maps it leaves a lot to be desired with map variety for a base game. Would have been better to have 14 or so maps for MP and 6 or so for War mode. Never been a huge Zombies fan of any of the CoDs so I can't comment on that since it wouldn't be specific to this game.

    Overall Impression:

    Solid, super fun game. If you like boots-on-the-ground CoD then this game is a pleasant return to CoDs roots. The MP is really fun and enjoyable. Divisions is a welcome addition creating additional variety. Overall really well pleased with this imperfect game. Hopefully they continue to make QoL improvements throughout its lifespan.    … Expand
  28. Juder007
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Putting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sightPutting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sight killing enemies you can barely see. It's like the most beautiful cinematic piece of **** phone app game. I don't know about multiplayer because I can't join. But judging from campaign, it's **** I've yet to see a good Activision game, personally, not sure how they keep getting contracts to create games. Sledgehammer, what, has a b or c rated xbox original game that hardly anyone plays? The gameplay is **** the story is way oversold by the company and it's bought for critics. They make it out to be like some Private Ryan movie, not even close. It's just another video game story with some cool cinematic scenes in between garbage gameplay. This was the first game I ever pre-bought, and the last. I'm a big call of duty fan, missed the last couple, all advanced stuff, but **** off. This is not some groundbreaking new stuff they claimed it to be. It's the same old garbage.… Expand
  29. Riandaniar
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
  30. WillgocostaBR
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

52
#52 Best Xbox One Game of 2017
8
#8 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2017
6
#6 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 21
  3. Negative: 0 out of 21
  1. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2017
    80
    A streamlined multiplayer and less gimmicky single-player gives CoD a nice refresh.
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 10, 2017
    70
    At its best it's a game of tactics for even the most casual player. [Issue#314, p.112]
  3. The Sydney Morning Herald
    Nov 29, 2017
    70
    This is another fun, fleeting, exceptionally good-looking Call of Duty game, but its World War II theme doesn't add much besides bringing some of its mechanics back down to Earth.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »