Call of Duty: WWII

 Xbox One
User Score
5.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 520 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 193 out of 520
  2. Mixed: 89 out of 520
  3. Negative: 238 out of 520
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. cem12
    Nov 10, 2017
    5
    Gráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas lasGráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas las cuales jamás hubo batalla alguna. Es un juego lleno de micro transacciones, fomentando la compra de productos ya que te muestra descaradamente lo que le toca al resto de jugadores. Los emblemas nazis "volaron", jamás podrás elegir uniforme aleman. Siendo americano juegas con armas alemanas, no te da opción a elegir. Sigo enamorado el Cod: World at War, un juego que sí cumplía con la historia, escenarios y soldados. pensaba que Activision por fin lo iba a volver a hacer, pero me equivoque. Han creado un juego de "guerra antigua" por llamarlo de alguna manera, para que los "niños rata" sean felices. Creando micro transacciones, matar por matar ya que no matas Nazis, sino alemanes que no han hecho nada; poniendo mujeres que apenas las hubo en los ejércitos alemanes ni americanos, creando las cajas de de premios "traga perras" Lo único que celebro, es que por fin se abandonen los malditos juegos futuristas.… Expand
  2. PowerGamer
    Nov 9, 2017
    4
    Quite simply if the bugs don't kill you than the script kiddie hack buyers will.
    Game crashes a lot, has lame bugs like having to reset your weapons every round, etc., and still not fixed a week later.
    Then apparently bored of the game, the hacks started showing up in full force a week after launch. You watch the kill cam and they obviously see where you are, do constant head shots and    Quite simply if the bugs don't kill you than the script kiddie hack buyers will.
    Game crashes a lot, has lame bugs like having to reset your weapons every round, etc., and still not fixed a week later.
    Then apparently bored of the game, the hacks started showing up in full force a week after launch.
    You watch the kill cam and they obviously see where you are, do constant head shots and have 15 kills and 0 deaths.
    And how is it a level 4 mastered the game with out even leveling yet. But I'm sure if you look tomorrow they'll be easily level 50 at their hack rates.
    Where is the anti-cheat?

    Finally the solo mission is nothing special. Pretty boring. Adds nothing new.

    I should have known to wait awhile for reviews first..    … Expand
  3. Warhawk-1999
    Nov 8, 2017
    9
    I have not had any problems with this game so far i think that ww2 is a great game and it is a great tribute to the old games like cod waw. The zombies has brought back the fear factor is zombies. the ee for the maps are to easy there sapost to be achievements not a easy step by step tutorial. When i do the eastereggs i want to feel accomplished that i was one of the top .9% ect toI have not had any problems with this game so far i think that ww2 is a great game and it is a great tribute to the old games like cod waw. The zombies has brought back the fear factor is zombies. the ee for the maps are to easy there sapost to be achievements not a easy step by step tutorial. When i do the eastereggs i want to feel accomplished that i was one of the top .9% ect to complete the map not already hav 10% of all players complete the map because there so easy… Expand
  4. TrumpHater67420
    Nov 8, 2017
    6
    Call Of Duty WWII is my favorite COD in the series. It has a great campaign and fun multiplayer, but it has one major flaw. As of a few days after launch, COD WWII has major multiplayer connection issues. Nobody appears in the HQ, just myself, and about 20-30% of games I get disconnected from at the end and lose all my XP earned. This is very frustrating as I would be prestiged by now (ICall Of Duty WWII is my favorite COD in the series. It has a great campaign and fun multiplayer, but it has one major flaw. As of a few days after launch, COD WWII has major multiplayer connection issues. Nobody appears in the HQ, just myself, and about 20-30% of games I get disconnected from at the end and lose all my XP earned. This is very frustrating as I would be prestiged by now (I am Rank 50). This is a great game but I would not buy it now, wait a few weeks for server issues to be fixed.… Expand
  5. APMerry
    Nov 8, 2017
    9
    My first cod since black ops 2 and I'm really enjoying it. It's the same multiplayer as before, fast paced and fun. The campaign is entertaining, but a bit too "American" if you know what I mean. Most reviews seem to be hating on this game because that the "cool" thing to do isn't it with COD. They really messed up the launch, but you can't base a review on 1 weekend where the servers wereMy first cod since black ops 2 and I'm really enjoying it. It's the same multiplayer as before, fast paced and fun. The campaign is entertaining, but a bit too "American" if you know what I mean. Most reviews seem to be hating on this game because that the "cool" thing to do isn't it with COD. They really messed up the launch, but you can't base a review on 1 weekend where the servers were down. I really like the HQ section and working towards the orders objectives and redeeming collections keeps you grinding up the ranks. There's nothing in the loot crates that give's the player an advantage (at the time of this review) and I hope it stays that way. Cosmetic items are fun and I enjoy the customisation. The divisions are pretty much the same as create a class from the old games, it's just been renamed.

    Overall i think it's a solid game that will have my attention into the new year. The move back to WW2 was a welcome one.    … Expand
  6. FerPSX
    Nov 7, 2017
    2
    If SH fixes their game I will change the score.
    The game is broken, it have several issues, like input lag, hit detection, servers... and it have minor issues like emotes (the worst emotes in the past 4yrs) menus, time to wait between matches.
    I can’t believe all the bad critics to CoD IW from the CoD community (haters doesn’t count, they hate every CoD), infinity Ward made a better    If SH fixes their game I will change the score.
    The game is broken, it have several issues, like input lag, hit detection, servers... and it have minor issues like emotes (the worst emotes in the past 4yrs) menus, time to wait between matches.
    I can’t believe all the bad critics to CoD IW from the CoD community (haters doesn’t count, they hate every CoD), infinity Ward made a better game than CoD WWII, at least a complete game.    … Expand
  7. Tenacidad963
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Este Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero seEste Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero se pierde el aspecto de inmersión. A pesar de tener gráficos actuales se ve como si fuera para niños. Entonces te das cuenta de que te subestiman como jugador, independientemente de que si ya has jugado a otros Call Of Duty´s. La campaña dura poco de entre 5 o 6 horas, el multijugador parece que le han puesto mucho entusiasmo parece que creen que el jugador es conformista y fácil de manejar.

    In English
    This Call Of Duty is a mockery to the intelligence, it can have in some parts good graphics and few good moments that please those who do not ask much for a game. However, they spoil a very important historical fact by putting boxes of micropayments. Eliminate a moment that should be epic for putting in the face of the player his bad practice of selling items that help you, but you lose the immersive aspect. Despite having current graphics it looks as if it were for children. Then you realize that they underestimate you as a player, regardless of whether you have already played other Call Of Duty's. The campaign lasts little between 5 or 6 hours, the multiplayer seems to have put a lot of enthusiasm seems to believe that the player is conformist and easy to handle.    … Expand
  8. mechroblaster
    Nov 7, 2017
    8
    This is the first CoD game I've purchased in years and I'm happy with the purchase.

    Pros: Really enjoying the WWII campaign and story. The MP is a lot of fun with a variety of modes. War mode is especially fun. The graphics, sound and feel of the game are of great quality. Cons: With only 9 MP maps and 3 War mode maps it leaves a lot to be desired with map variety for a base    This is the first CoD game I've purchased in years and I'm happy with the purchase.

    Pros:

    Really enjoying the WWII campaign and story. The MP is a lot of fun with a variety of modes. War mode is especially fun. The graphics, sound and feel of the game are of great quality.

    Cons:

    With only 9 MP maps and 3 War mode maps it leaves a lot to be desired with map variety for a base game. Would have been better to have 14 or so maps for MP and 6 or so for War mode. Never been a huge Zombies fan of any of the CoDs so I can't comment on that since it wouldn't be specific to this game.

    Overall Impression:

    Solid, super fun game. If you like boots-on-the-ground CoD then this game is a pleasant return to CoDs roots. The MP is really fun and enjoyable. Divisions is a welcome addition creating additional variety. Overall really well pleased with this imperfect game. Hopefully they continue to make QoL improvements throughout its lifespan.    … Expand
  9. Riandaniar
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
  10. Xalon
    Nov 7, 2017
    1
    They screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game aThey screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game a chance? Pass on this at all costs.… Expand
  11. TheFreeman148
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Been a huge Call of Duty fan for over a decade now and this rendition is good but simply not great. The campaign has some great cinematics and graphics but it is extremely boring and repetitive. The first couple of missions feel great but that feeling washes away after your 100th Nazi kill. There's just nothing really pulling me in here. The multiplayer has some nice additions like theBeen a huge Call of Duty fan for over a decade now and this rendition is good but simply not great. The campaign has some great cinematics and graphics but it is extremely boring and repetitive. The first couple of missions feel great but that feeling washes away after your 100th Nazi kill. There's just nothing really pulling me in here. The multiplayer has some nice additions like the Headquarters which basically adds a Destiny like "kick-back area" that allows you to interact with players. I do really like this because it adds more to the wait times in between matches. The interface is kind of confusing at first but you get used to it eventually. In terms of actual gameplay in multiplayer, there are so many hardos ALREADY. Finding a lobby without at least 2 prestigers is almost impossible. My suggestion is to get the game ASAP so you can keep up with everyone already playing. FInally, Zombies is very well done. New enemy varieties come in waves and the guns feel really great to use. I gave this game a 7 because I feel like there is just something I wish was here but isn't. Maybe time will add new features but until then i'll be playing off and on.… Expand
  12. Plush
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    I was almost scared away by all the outrageously negative user reviews, but I was lured by the prospect of WW2 returning to the glory days of MW2 & MW3 that I loved so much. Glad I went for it! The multiplayer simply feels like an updated 2017 version of "boots on the ground" MW2.

    The negative reviews show that the game isn't for everyone, though. What I'm about to say will squarely    I was almost scared away by all the outrageously negative user reviews, but I was lured by the prospect of WW2 returning to the glory days of MW2 & MW3 that I loved so much. Glad I went for it! The multiplayer simply feels like an updated 2017 version of "boots on the ground" MW2.

    The negative reviews show that the game isn't for everyone, though. What I'm about to say will squarely mark me as the classic CoD d-bag player stereotype, but all these players' way over-the-top level of freaking out almost makes me wonder if they're just mad because they can't handle getting killed. You can't walk in and pwn people from the first moment and have success from the beginning like it's Candy Crush or something. Sheesh.

    Everyone overrates themselves and their skill level with these games. Maybe you just suck. I have no other explanation for such a visceral reaction and all the 0/10 scores. It's silly. You have to be fast on the trigger to beat people, and when you're not, you get to watch kill cams all day... and then you go cry to the internet that the game is broken. It's not broken, and I'm looking forward to shooting you up till you call me a "hacker" and rage quit. REEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!    … Expand
  13. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  14. Tigerstripe612
    Nov 6, 2017
    8
    This COD is actually pretty good! Passed on Infinite Warfare because I was sick of the futuristic CODs; however, decided to give WWII a go since WAW was one of my favorite CODs of all time. Also, I think Advanced Warfare was a great game since it wasn't completely over the top with the futuristic crap and it brought fun/innovation to the COD series, hence giving Sledgehammer Games myThis COD is actually pretty good! Passed on Infinite Warfare because I was sick of the futuristic CODs; however, decided to give WWII a go since WAW was one of my favorite CODs of all time. Also, I think Advanced Warfare was a great game since it wasn't completely over the top with the futuristic crap and it brought fun/innovation to the COD series, hence giving Sledgehammer Games my support again. Kinda disappointed with only getting 9 multiplayer maps when older CODs would give us 14 or so at launch. Weapons are cool and sound great. The new War mode is fun and engaging; I always wondered what it would be like to be a German soldier mowing down the Americans from the machine gun bunker on the beaches of Normandy (you get to do this in one of the War mode sections). There's a new social space like Destiny's tower which allows you team up with others, tryout score streaks, do weapon paint jobs, and pick up challenges that help with level progression and allow you to acquire special weapons/gear. Lastly, it's great to have boots on the ground again!

    The graphics are good for what the outdated engine will allow but the developers need to design a new COD engine if they want to keep up with Destiny and Battlefield visuals. Sledgehammer Games did a great job again and delivered a fine product. It's not perfect by no means but there's not too much to complain about. If they would've used an updated engine and delivered more maps, most of us COD fans would be more than happy. Lastly, it's great to have boots on the ground again!    … Expand
  15. WillgocostaBR
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
  16. Fragnum24
    Nov 6, 2017
    1
    You can tell they tried, but this has to be the final nail in this coffin? I really tried to enjoy it but the whole game seems flacid and devoid of anything that embraces you as a gamer.
    I gave my copy to my 10 year old cousin and he absolutely hates it too.
    TL;DR - bought once, already had two owners, both owners wanted it out of the house asap.
  17. hjsimp5
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Finally a decent Call of Duty. The last few years the multiplayer has just been rubbish. This one feels fresh but familiar. Boots on the ground! No more getting shot in the back by some idiot jetpacking over you before you even realise there is someone there.

    The single player campaign is amazing. Something about doing the beach landings at Normandy sends a chill down my spine    Finally a decent Call of Duty. The last few years the multiplayer has just been rubbish. This one feels fresh but familiar. Boots on the ground! No more getting shot in the back by some idiot jetpacking over you before you even realise there is someone there.

    The single player campaign is amazing. Something about doing the beach landings at Normandy sends a chill down my spine every time. Nazi Zombies is decent, but I have to admit that I still miss Extinction.

    Very impressive visually, and the controls and gameplay just feel nice and smooth. Welcome back COD!    … Expand
  18. iamevilhomer
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol. Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol.

    Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough research and have seen that the game is as I had expected. Trash... But hey... We smart people all saw this coming. We knew it was going to suck lol. Just another terrible cod game with the WW2 paint coat put on.

    Short 6 hour campaign that's not very historically accurate as advertised. Also has dumb AI and glitches on top of stuttering issues many have been reporting.

    Game also has micro transactions which automatically knocks the game down several points.

    Lobbies and load times are totally garbage in this game. Dead zone issues with aiming have been reported multiple times.

    Trash maps that are very few with many guns missing that I'm sure will be released over time through dlc/micro transaction horse **** and butt ****ery...

    Here's the funniest thing of all... Apparently the ps4 version is working better than the xbox one version. The xbox one version was unplayable for the first few days of launch for most xbox one folk... At least the online multiplayer part. So why is the ps4 version getting a slightly lower metacritic critic score by the critics???? Lol whatever... Maybe it's got something to do with that over priced and pretty much useless for gamers console known as the xbox one x? Who knows who cares...

    There are other problems but I don't care to remember them right now. I'm just caring enough to do this review for laughs and for the good of gaming. DON'T buy jokes of a game like this one. They exist to rob you blind and leave you with nothing but frustration. You people should honestly know this by now. I mean for ****s sake... It's cod... It's crap division... It's supposed to suck lol.

    Decent visuals though... Lets not let this review be all negativity... Gotta give credit where it's due I suppose... Just to be fair and nice : )

    Even without many of the problems I listed though... It's still just trashy cod at the end of the day so I would still give it a low score lolz.

    I have never actually given a game a 0 before. I gave the ps4 version a 1 since it at least runs decently on the ps4. But since pretty much absolutely nothing works on the xbox one version... I'm going to have to give this a 0. I'm sorry but decent visuals in this case being the only decent thing about the game isn't enough to give this trash even 1 point. The game being a broken unfinished mess on top of being a corporate cash cow micro transaction game designed to screw you over means I'm not giving it any credit. It's not even a game to me. It's just a scam at the end of the day. You all know it's true. Those of you who actually have a brain that is...    … Expand
  19. SchroederRock
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Outside of an OK campaign and strong Nazi Zombies game mode, there's not much to love with WWII. For $60, that will make CoD WWII another letdown for CoD, which has again churned out a somewhat boring yearly release. No timeline change can mask the problems with the gameplay design and the lack of imagination. Only a significant drop in sales will signal to Activision to kill off thisOutside of an OK campaign and strong Nazi Zombies game mode, there's not much to love with WWII. For $60, that will make CoD WWII another letdown for CoD, which has again churned out a somewhat boring yearly release. No timeline change can mask the problems with the gameplay design and the lack of imagination. Only a significant drop in sales will signal to Activision to kill off this series and let the studios do their own thing. If you haven't been happy with CoD for years, you're not going to like this much at all. My advice: rent the game for a couple days and play the campaign. If you love Nazi Zombies, that's about the only high replay value you can find from this otherwise-limited shooter. If you love the era, what are you doing buying this game? Battlefield 1, though more complex and less rookie-friendly at times, is a MUCH better display into this era of history and should be favored over WWII. Side note: this game looks pretty lame in multiplayer - Call of Duty has finally shown its age as its game engine has lacked convincing detail on consoles. Some may find it appealing but I'd have to contest their gameplay catalog as several other AAA titles do a significantly better job of showing something beautiful on-screen.… Expand
  20. sgy0003
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter bs

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are fun    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter bs

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are fun it only lasts about 15-20 min as part of a mission, and NOT as a whole mission. Espionage while entertaining, it's easy enough for anyone with basic stealth instincts can plow through. And Stealth.....oh my god, it sucks. There is so much stealth in this game. You'd think that would be nice taking a break from full frontal combat, but these stealth sections are annoyingly paced. I was expecting a brother-in-arms type of bonding with my npc comrades, but that never happened.

    Multiplayer is also a lot better, but still kinda the same. We finally don't have jet-packs and futuristic abilities, so the gameplay is much more grounded (literally). It's still only fun when you are the one kicking asses, but you'll still be plagued with cheap shots, 6-year olds who apparently did your mother, and those who are better than you. Oh and lootboxes, while unnecessary, shows the greedy corperate bs side of Activision in a full force.

    If you are looking to get COD, WWII is the game I'd recommend(sorta). The game looks great, campaign has its moments, and multiplayer as always needs some serious balancing.    … Expand
  21. Maverickneo
    Nov 5, 2017
    8
    There will alway sbe hate for COD games. While the online still has some fixing to do, (Lag and launch problems) I really like how its back to boots on the ground and based on gunplay. It has the WW2 look and feel while also adding some modern moments to it. If you are tired of all the fast paced jump packs and flying, this turns it down a notch. I finally feel like Im playing classicThere will alway sbe hate for COD games. While the online still has some fixing to do, (Lag and launch problems) I really like how its back to boots on the ground and based on gunplay. It has the WW2 look and feel while also adding some modern moments to it. If you are tired of all the fast paced jump packs and flying, this turns it down a notch. I finally feel like Im playing classic COD again. The campaign is a bit weird to follow at first but from halfway to the end it comes together really well. We finally get to experience the WW2 campaign on next gen systems. I dont think this game is bad at all. Im loving it. Dont let the hater reviews fool you check it out for yourself.… Expand
  22. Lochie
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    As an Australian it is now 57 hours since I purchased this game. I can't play online at all with a fibre connection. I will not praise a single player campaign of 5 hours, that standard should've never become acceptable. I have stayed away from CoD for a while, returning with high hopes. I'll try and get a refund today.
  23. KittyWhisky
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The story tells the usual story of a military soldier. Together with brothers in arms wades through a real hell. We've seen similar stories in games, the war has not been shown so realistically. Basically, this effect causes dismemberment. Very often we will see people without body parts, burning people and the atrocities of the Nazis.

    The plot is simple, but you believe in this war, believe what is happening on the screen. All the characters have their own character, everyone has their demons. It is interesting to observe the drama of the characters.

    The gameplay is now in spirit first every part OF CALL OF DUTY. Because of this the gameplay has become more boring. You sit behind cover and aims at enemies. Diversity is not. But there is one good innovation. The developers decided to implement in a single company element of teamwork. If we need supplies, first aid kit or swegene about the enemy - we are asking comrades. This is an interesting thing. and Yes, now health itself is not restored - it is necessary to look for kits. Here you don't feel like a super soldier ready to kill everyone, you could die at any moment.

    Call of Duty: WWII is a game about realistic warfare. A single company is not very long, but no time to get bored. It's not the best Call of Duty, gameplay and artistic design can to lose IW, but nevertheless it was nice to return to the battlefields of WWII.    … Expand
  24. Chiefaholic9
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Multiplayer server issues galore. Headquarters menu system is a bust. Supply drops don't work. End of match glitches that make the game freeze and force you to restart. And that's if you're lucky enough to be able to connect to Xbox live at all. Poor launch.
  25. Juder007
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Putting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sightPutting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sight killing enemies you can barely see. It's like the most beautiful cinematic piece of **** phone app game. I don't know about multiplayer because I can't join. But judging from campaign, it's **** I've yet to see a good Activision game, personally, not sure how they keep getting contracts to create games. Sledgehammer, what, has a b or c rated xbox original game that hardly anyone plays? The gameplay is **** the story is way oversold by the company and it's bought for critics. They make it out to be like some Private Ryan movie, not even close. It's just another video game story with some cool cinematic scenes in between garbage gameplay. This was the first game I ever pre-bought, and the last. I'm a big call of duty fan, missed the last couple, all advanced stuff, but **** off. This is not some groundbreaking new stuff they claimed it to be. It's the same old garbage.… Expand
  26. riverkev95
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    Una correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente queUna correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente que paga por mejores armas con la gente que juega sin pagar mas por el videojuego es terrible.
    A pesar de sus puntos positivos anteriormente descritos, lo que mas choca en este juego es el hecho de que se hayan implementado todas las políticas mas nefastas que existen actualmente en el mundo de los videojuegos, aprovechandose así de su inmensa base de usuarios fieles a la saga.
    Entre estas políticas nefastas puedo mencionar que el juego viene recortado de lanzamiento (Prueba de esto es el DLC ya anunciado para enero de 2018), las lootboxes que están tan de moda en casi todos los videojuegos pero en este juego son implementadas de una forma mas descarada ya que tú puedes ver como los otros jugadores reciben sus premios tras comprar una cajita de estas, esto va acorde al matchmaking que relacione jugadores que no han gastado dinero extra en el videojuego con personas que gastan un montón y por lo tanto consiguen mejores armas en tu cara, lo cual provoca un online totalmente desbalanceado, por no decir que roto.
    En conclusión, este juego mejora algunos aspectos del juego del año anterior, pero la forma tan descarada en que Activision gana dinero de sus usuarios en este juego no me deja ponerle una mejor nota que "3".    … Expand
  27. kyaz
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    This is call of duty, where they take your money and deliver a piss poor game.

    I've spent more time on loading screens than playing the game. It takes 5 minutes to connect to a base of ops. fine. join a game, the scoreboard at the end is broken 90% of the time so you cant leave or vote for another map. then when you finally are able to quit at the end of the timer, it takes another 5    This is call of duty, where they take your money and deliver a piss poor game.

    I've spent more time on loading screens than playing the game. It takes 5 minutes to connect to a base of ops. fine. join a game, the scoreboard at the end is broken 90% of the time so you cant leave or vote for another map. then when you finally are able to quit at the end of the timer, it takes another 5 minutes to join a base of ops again. Thats if you don't timeout, btw.

    AND THIS IS AFTER THEY "FIXED" IT AFTER THE FUMBLED LAUNCH.

    gave it a 1/10 because it has a campaign, but tbh it doesn't matter how the campaign is, its overshadowed by the fact that they have no idea what they are doing when it comes to multiplayer or social space or anything regarding a network. at all. if they can't fix it in the next day or so, its not even worth it to me. i'll be returning it without hesitation.    … Expand
  28. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that dont fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  29. rusyn
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Good polish and pretty game, but the gameplay is nothing new, if even a few steps backwards for shooters. Also, Activision's grip is VERY apparent: In my two hours of multiplayer time, I swear I saw at least 15 microtransaction pushes. Greedy and hollow.
  30. dlwatso15
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Absolutely amazing. What everyone has been waiting for. Do not listen to the reviews from the kids who can't afford the game and so they hate on it. It's a 10 out of 10.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

52
#52 Best Xbox One Game of 2017
8
#8 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2017
6
#6 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 21
  3. Negative: 0 out of 21
  1. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2017
    80
    A streamlined multiplayer and less gimmicky single-player gives CoD a nice refresh.
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 10, 2017
    70
    At its best it's a game of tactics for even the most casual player. [Issue#314, p.112]
  3. The Sydney Morning Herald
    Nov 29, 2017
    70
    This is another fun, fleeting, exceptionally good-looking Call of Duty game, but its World War II theme doesn't add much besides bringing some of its mechanics back down to Earth.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »