Call of Duty: WWII

 Xbox One
User Score
5.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 520 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 193 out of 520
  2. Mixed: 89 out of 520
  3. Negative: 238 out of 520
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. JustMK
    Dec 30, 2017
    1
    Boringest Call of Duty that put me into sleep with first minutes of gameplay. I really liked Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare for their awesome futuristing setting, and I completely bored, annoyed of WWII theme in 2000's.
    I want back AW/IW-like CoD games. That was awesome
  2. rusyn
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Good polish and pretty game, but the gameplay is nothing new, if even a few steps backwards for shooters. Also, Activision's grip is VERY apparent: In my two hours of multiplayer time, I swear I saw at least 15 microtransaction pushes. Greedy and hollow.
  3. Lochie
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    As an Australian it is now 57 hours since I purchased this game. I can't play online at all with a fibre connection. I will not praise a single player campaign of 5 hours, that standard should've never become acceptable. I have stayed away from CoD for a while, returning with high hopes. I'll try and get a refund today.
  4. Broyax
    Feb 7, 2019
    1
    Voici l'Appel du Devoir numéro 425621556 dont le sujet se déroule cette fois pendant la Seconde Guerre Mondiale... comme un certain Appel du Devoir 2 il y a des lunes et des lunes ! quelle originalité, les bras nous en tombent et nous en restons bouche bée.

    C'est reparti donc comme en 40 ou 44 plutôt pour sauver le monde libre mais occupé et comme jadis, c'est la foire aux scripts dans    Voici l'Appel du Devoir numéro 425621556 dont le sujet se déroule cette fois pendant la Seconde Guerre Mondiale... comme un certain Appel du Devoir 2 il y a des lunes et des lunes ! quelle originalité, les bras nous en tombent et nous en restons bouche bée.

    C'est reparti donc comme en 40 ou 44 plutôt pour sauver le monde libre mais occupé et comme jadis, c'est la foire aux scripts dans ce jeu-couloir certes spectaculaire mais rapidement aussi ennuyeux qu'un discours à l'Assemblée. En vérité, on s'ennuie si vite qu'on envoit des SMS et qu'on lâche des "kikoos" sur les réseaux sochiasses.

    Aux scripts innombrables viennent se greffer des saloperies de QTE et si la vie ne remonte plus toute seule (incroyable...) si on peut utiliser des trousses de soin, le jeu reste fidèle à lui-même, entièrement suspendu à votre bon vouloir, car la guerre c'est vous qui allez la gagner et personne d'autre : tant que vous ne percutez pas le script qui déclenche l'évènement suivant, les ennemis et vos copains se mettent sur la gueule et ressuscitent en masse ad vitam eternam comme des **** bots coincés dans une boucle. C'est assez risible à voir !

    On reste en tout cas souvent à l'étroit dans ces niveaux et la jouabilité n'a pas évolué d'un iota pour sa part : épaulez, visez et visez surtout la tête parce que sinon il en faudra des bastos pour les zigouiller ces andouilles ! De toute façon, on a jamais l'impression de vraiment jouer mais d'être coincé dans un caddy de supermarché lancé à grande vitesse avec des dialogues écrits par la ménagère de moins de 50 ans.

    Même le bilan technique qui devrait être bon, voire très bon, ne l'est pas totalement... En effet, si on a la 4K à 60 im/s (sur la X), toutes les cinématiques semblent soit à 30, soit victimes de sévères ralentissements... Le jeu reste terne (à tous les égards d'ailleurs) et depuis cet abruti de Soldat Ryan, toutes les oeuvres "modernes" sur la WWII veulent nous faire croire que les vaillants soldats étaient daltoniens.

    Enfin, je ne comprends pas pourquoi ce retour sur la WWII qui commence à sentir le réchauffé... remarquez, parler de "réchauffé" à propos d'un Call of est un pléonasme doublé d'une lapalissade. On dit que la guerre est terrible et c'est vrai : terriblement ennuyeuse et percluse de rhumatismes comme ce Call of qui n'en peut plus : achevez-le et enterrez-le dans le désert, qu'on en parle plus !    … Expand
  5. kyaz
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    This is call of duty, where they take your money and deliver a piss poor game.

    I've spent more time on loading screens than playing the game. It takes 5 minutes to connect to a base of ops. fine. join a game, the scoreboard at the end is broken 90% of the time so you cant leave or vote for another map. then when you finally are able to quit at the end of the timer, it takes another 5    This is call of duty, where they take your money and deliver a piss poor game.

    I've spent more time on loading screens than playing the game. It takes 5 minutes to connect to a base of ops. fine. join a game, the scoreboard at the end is broken 90% of the time so you cant leave or vote for another map. then when you finally are able to quit at the end of the timer, it takes another 5 minutes to join a base of ops again. Thats if you don't timeout, btw.

    AND THIS IS AFTER THEY "FIXED" IT AFTER THE FUMBLED LAUNCH.

    gave it a 1/10 because it has a campaign, but tbh it doesn't matter how the campaign is, its overshadowed by the fact that they have no idea what they are doing when it comes to multiplayer or social space or anything regarding a network. at all. if they can't fix it in the next day or so, its not even worth it to me. i'll be returning it without hesitation.    … Expand
  6. Juder007
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Putting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sightPutting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sight killing enemies you can barely see. It's like the most beautiful cinematic piece of **** phone app game. I don't know about multiplayer because I can't join. But judging from campaign, it's **** I've yet to see a good Activision game, personally, not sure how they keep getting contracts to create games. Sledgehammer, what, has a b or c rated xbox original game that hardly anyone plays? The gameplay is **** the story is way oversold by the company and it's bought for critics. They make it out to be like some Private Ryan movie, not even close. It's just another video game story with some cool cinematic scenes in between garbage gameplay. This was the first game I ever pre-bought, and the last. I'm a big call of duty fan, missed the last couple, all advanced stuff, but **** off. This is not some groundbreaking new stuff they claimed it to be. It's the same old garbage.… Expand
  7. Fragnum24
    Nov 6, 2017
    1
    You can tell they tried, but this has to be the final nail in this coffin? I really tried to enjoy it but the whole game seems flacid and devoid of anything that embraces you as a gamer.
    I gave my copy to my 10 year old cousin and he absolutely hates it too.
    TL;DR - bought once, already had two owners, both owners wanted it out of the house asap.
  8. highbynine
    Nov 21, 2017
    1
    Very disappointed in this game. I guess I missed the info. But no campaign coop?? You're telling me I can't storm the beaches of Normandy with friends? Extremely disappointing!!
  9. MollyMagoo
    Dec 21, 2017
    1
    WORST COD OF ALL TIME. I generously give it one point for removing jet packs. I've played a lot of COD's. Some I loved, some I liked, some I didn't like. This is the first one I hate. I want my money back. I feel cheated. Multiplayer is an absolute **** show. Activision buys its servers at local garage sales, and hires high school drop-outs and homeless people to run them. Only 9WORST COD OF ALL TIME. I generously give it one point for removing jet packs. I've played a lot of COD's. Some I loved, some I liked, some I didn't like. This is the first one I hate. I want my money back. I feel cheated. Multiplayer is an absolute **** show. Activision buys its servers at local garage sales, and hires high school drop-outs and homeless people to run them. Only 9 multiplayer maps at launch, and 7 of them suck. The other 2 aren't very good either. If someone tells you the 3 War mode maps count as multiplayer maps, spit in their face. This game is utterly devoid of content and any sort of personality. The new divisions system is **** Sprint distances/sprint out times are **** This game does everything it can to punish you for trying to enjoy COD as we've always known it.. Don't waste your time or money on this trash. I will never buy another Sledgehammer COD.… Expand
  10. skidzilla
    Mar 23, 2018
    1
    this game is crap utter crap, like for them to give this game a 80 makes me wonder whom is on the take ....
  11. Nathan-D
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    So the first two written "reviews" by voodoo_911 and bdelpesco below giving this game 10 and 9 respectively are suspiciously brief and likely fake. This is the first COD game I've bought in years and it's such a tragic disappointment. The main issues with the game for me are the Divisions classes, the unresponsive controls and the maps. The Division classes essentially force you to playSo the first two written "reviews" by voodoo_911 and bdelpesco below giving this game 10 and 9 respectively are suspiciously brief and likely fake. This is the first COD game I've bought in years and it's such a tragic disappointment. The main issues with the game for me are the Divisions classes, the unresponsive controls and the maps. The Division classes essentially force you to play certain ways. So instead of picking perks to best suit your play-style you choose divisions. It's needlessly restrictive and feels as though this is just another way that the developers are trying to "even out" the competition, as so to give newcomers a better chance. The maps are designed in a way whereby if you're playing S&D it's hard to flank and you'll usually just run into people head-glitching on something. There is nothing "dynamic" about this game. It's unresponsive, the map design feels lazy and the visuals are poor compared to other current-gen games. It's one of those rare instances where the game is so rubbish that I can't even be bothered to give it a longer, more in-depth review. Waste of money… Expand
  12. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that dont fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  13. WillgocostaBR
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
  14. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  15. koolaidman486
    Apr 26, 2018
    0
    Call of Duty World War 2 is the single worst video game that I have ever played. Every single "professional" reviewer is wrong here.
    Campaign:
    Generic One theatre of the war Bland Literally MW3 but in World War 2 without any of the character Zombies: Flat downgrade to Treyarch and Infinity Ward in almost every way, fails at being scary or fun. Multiplayer: Connections are ****    Call of Duty World War 2 is the single worst video game that I have ever played. Every single "professional" reviewer is wrong here.
    Campaign:
    Generic
    One theatre of the war
    Bland
    Literally MW3 but in World War 2 without any of the character

    Zombies:
    Flat downgrade to Treyarch and Infinity Ward in almost every way, fails at being scary or fun.

    Multiplayer:
    Connections are ****
    Balance is far and away the worst in the series
    DLC weapons are way too common (close to as many or more than Infinite Warfare during that game's entire cycle, and this game is 6 months in as of me posting this).
    You will unload on people and have them take 0 hits, multiple times a match
    You will be shot around corners
    The division system is complete trash when compared to Pic 10 and the classic system
    Maps are mostly bland, boring, samey, and generally terrible
    Spawns are laughable

    Yeah, I will under zero circumstances recommend this game to anybody. If you want a frustrating and overall crap experience, this is the game for you, even then, Ghosts will only cost you $15 so go for the miserable experience that actually works, not this pile of literal garbage.    … Expand
  16. iamevilhomer
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol. Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol.

    Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough research and have seen that the game is as I had expected. Trash... But hey... We smart people all saw this coming. We knew it was going to suck lol. Just another terrible cod game with the WW2 paint coat put on.

    Short 6 hour campaign that's not very historically accurate as advertised. Also has dumb AI and glitches on top of stuttering issues many have been reporting.

    Game also has micro transactions which automatically knocks the game down several points.

    Lobbies and load times are totally garbage in this game. Dead zone issues with aiming have been reported multiple times.

    Trash maps that are very few with many guns missing that I'm sure will be released over time through dlc/micro transaction horse **** and butt ****ery...

    Here's the funniest thing of all... Apparently the ps4 version is working better than the xbox one version. The xbox one version was unplayable for the first few days of launch for most xbox one folk... At least the online multiplayer part. So why is the ps4 version getting a slightly lower metacritic critic score by the critics???? Lol whatever... Maybe it's got something to do with that over priced and pretty much useless for gamers console known as the xbox one x? Who knows who cares...

    There are other problems but I don't care to remember them right now. I'm just caring enough to do this review for laughs and for the good of gaming. DON'T buy jokes of a game like this one. They exist to rob you blind and leave you with nothing but frustration. You people should honestly know this by now. I mean for ****s sake... It's cod... It's crap division... It's supposed to suck lol.

    Decent visuals though... Lets not let this review be all negativity... Gotta give credit where it's due I suppose... Just to be fair and nice : )

    Even without many of the problems I listed though... It's still just trashy cod at the end of the day so I would still give it a low score lolz.

    I have never actually given a game a 0 before. I gave the ps4 version a 1 since it at least runs decently on the ps4. But since pretty much absolutely nothing works on the xbox one version... I'm going to have to give this a 0. I'm sorry but decent visuals in this case being the only decent thing about the game isn't enough to give this trash even 1 point. The game being a broken unfinished mess on top of being a corporate cash cow micro transaction game designed to screw you over means I'm not giving it any credit. It's not even a game to me. It's just a scam at the end of the day. You all know it's true. Those of you who actually have a brain that is...    … Expand
  17. Tenacidad963
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Este Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero seEste Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero se pierde el aspecto de inmersión. A pesar de tener gráficos actuales se ve como si fuera para niños. Entonces te das cuenta de que te subestiman como jugador, independientemente de que si ya has jugado a otros Call Of Duty´s. La campaña dura poco de entre 5 o 6 horas, el multijugador parece que le han puesto mucho entusiasmo parece que creen que el jugador es conformista y fácil de manejar.

    In English
    This Call Of Duty is a mockery to the intelligence, it can have in some parts good graphics and few good moments that please those who do not ask much for a game. However, they spoil a very important historical fact by putting boxes of micropayments. Eliminate a moment that should be epic for putting in the face of the player his bad practice of selling items that help you, but you lose the immersive aspect. Despite having current graphics it looks as if it were for children. Then you realize that they underestimate you as a player, regardless of whether you have already played other Call Of Duty's. The campaign lasts little between 5 or 6 hours, the multiplayer seems to have put a lot of enthusiasm seems to believe that the player is conformist and easy to handle.    … Expand
  18. weirdmagican21
    Jul 3, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. awful i thought this was gonna be the cod i got to max level on but it was not because of the connection issues and loading problems this is the last call of duty i am buying and the game made 500 million dollars and yet they still put loot boxes in it.… Expand
  19. IMPACT_XO
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    I joined here only in order to put the rating 1/10... Very bad. Activision has learned nothing. Best textures as always.
    I have no words how bad this game is
    Best regards, IMPACT.
  20. Chiefaholic9
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Multiplayer server issues galore. Headquarters menu system is a bust. Supply drops don't work. End of match glitches that make the game freeze and force you to restart. And that's if you're lucky enough to be able to connect to Xbox live at all. Poor launch.
  21. Riandaniar
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
  22. Xefan
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game has everything wrong with it that Call of Duty has had wrong with it since 2007, the difference is, it was acceptable then, but technology has moved on.

    The story is targeted entirely at the American audience and as a result entirely re-writes history and is grossly inaccurate almost to the point of being offensive - certainly so to anyone that actually fought in the war, what    This game has everything wrong with it that Call of Duty has had wrong with it since 2007, the difference is, it was acceptable then, but technology has moved on.

    The story is targeted entirely at the American audience and as a result entirely re-writes history and is grossly inaccurate almost to the point of being offensive - certainly so to anyone that actually fought in the war, what few of them there are left in the world for Activision to massively insult by writing their contribution out of history.

    Thus even outside of the non-working servers, the dated gameplay, the abysmal AI, the obscure fluctuations in difficulty, there is a fundamental problem in that even the single player storyline just isn't engaging simply because it's a load of functional nonsense passed off as fact.

    Activision could learn a lot from EA, whilst Battlefield 1 wasn't overly historically accurate in terms of weaponry, it's focus on the disparate storylines across the War was incredibly respectful to the countless sides who fought in it, which is far better than this insult that Activision have produced.

    This is a game from a different era, outdated technology, outdated gameplay, and outdated American exceptionalism that's well past it's sell-by date.    … Expand
  23. wonderwu
    Nov 12, 2017
    0
    This is by far the worst game to ever be released under the "Call of Duty" franchise. The actual gameplay itself is not terrible, but all of the bugs, glitches, and errors make it horrendous. They had a beta for this game, but clearly didn't try to use the information gathered from it to better the game, because it has most of the exact same problems. At launch, no one in America couldThis is by far the worst game to ever be released under the "Call of Duty" franchise. The actual gameplay itself is not terrible, but all of the bugs, glitches, and errors make it horrendous. They had a beta for this game, but clearly didn't try to use the information gathered from it to better the game, because it has most of the exact same problems. At launch, no one in America could play for the first 2 hours. Now a week later, they've released their first "patch" for the game, and screwed that up as well. Now the game has major lag and hit detection problems. I have spent most of my day trying to complete a special order, of winning one of each game type in multiplayer, but it has not gone well. Every single time I win a game of Capture the Flag, it kicks me out and doesn't award me with any EXP or the win towards the order. Though, if I lose the game, it will count. Sledgehammer Games should be ashamed to release this slop, and Activision should be embarrassed to release this under their moniker. I, for one, will never be purchasing another Call of Duty game if they can't even keep their own standards high.… Expand
  24. GaldinoKohler
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    Who cares about campaign? I don't. It might be good or not. We buy COD because we get to play the online multiplayer. Which seems to be awesome this time. No more jetpacking, no more people flying in the sky. But there is a caveat: Matchmaking is not functional. That's it. Totally bugged. 
    I've waited 20 minutes trying everything I could to get one match. Then I've entered in a game in    Who cares about campaign? I don't. It might be good or not. We buy COD because we get to play the online multiplayer. Which seems to be awesome this time. No more jetpacking, no more people flying in the sky. But there is a caveat: Matchmaking is not functional. That's it. Totally bugged. 
    I've waited 20 minutes trying everything I could to get one match. Then I've entered in a game in progress in a team being stomped.
    This is jut not fun at all... Hard-worked money throwed in a trash bin, that's how I feel. 
    By the way, I have a good cabled connection, up-to-date router and all that. Brazil, Xbox One here. I feel other platforms are also affected.
    Feels really bad.    … Expand
  25. OscarAdcock
    Nov 11, 2019
    0
    It’s actually the worst, just not enjoyable for me in any way with friends or solo.
    They made a mockery of WW2 and Sledghammer as a credible developer, **** this game...
  26. Baldpubis
    Dec 12, 2017
    0
    Remember the first 27 times they made this exact same game? Yeah. Those were great. Shooting people in the face and watching their blood squirt across the screen almost never gets old. But then it does. And now it is. Yawn.
  27. leltrollface
    Jan 19, 2018
    0
    This game is very"weird". sometimes its fun, other times you feel like screaming at your TV or monitor.

    CAMPAIGN. The campaign is all over the place.My favorite mission in this "campaign" is the first mission. if the first mission is the only good mission, thats when you have just **** up big time. I legit forgot the ending, but i dont need to know the ending to know what its gonna    This game is very"weird". sometimes its fun, other times you feel like screaming at your TV or monitor.

    CAMPAIGN.

    The campaign is all over the place.My favorite mission in this "campaign" is the first mission. if the first mission is the only good mission, thats when you have just **** up big time. I legit forgot the ending, but i dont need to know the ending to know what its gonna be. Its gonna end all like your the best and no one else could have done what you did. the "campaign" feels more like im watching a on rails movie then a actual game. The amount of explosions in the "campaign" felt like i was watching a battle unfold in fallout 4 if they all had fat mans.

    ZOMBIES.

    Zombies is actually really underrated. I mean, i know it do'sent really have anything special about it but if you think about it, neither did nacth dier untoten from WAW, same with verrtuck, shi no numa, and kino der toten. people always say those are the best maps ever, but they only say that because its treyarch. Like the "campaign" theirs a lot of explosions . Im actually okay with it because its made up so i dont give a **** now lets go into the biggest part of the game yet, the reason you bought this ****ing game.

    MULTI--wait i gotta wait for a update? k.
    *1 hour later*
    MULTIPLAYER.

    Multiplayer is really unbalanced. i mean all of these "nerf's" and "buffs" really do nothing. so what if they nerfed the STG or the FG42, those guns are still really overpowered. the maps are all the same in this game, left middle right.The new DLC guns are trash, the gewher 43 is like a m1a1 carbine, the sten is like a **** version of the grease gun, the GPMG is worse then pre-buffed Bren, the Ice Pick needs a little more range, the trench knifve is ok. my favriote map is opetation neptune. and thats it. TA TA, ****    … Expand
  28. Davis5018
    Dec 16, 2017
    0
    Let me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hopeLet me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hope sledgehammer reads this. Don't waste your money. I'd rather play hacked lobbies on MW2 than play COD ww2 ever again in my life. Can't believe I wasted 60 dollars on this piece of crap game. I say again, don't waste your money on this garbage game.… Expand
  29. bsg0075
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    in a word - THEFT. First, the game is a buggy pile of garbage. The hit markers mean nothing and then of course the bullet drop is non-existent. Four months the game has been out and there are THREE maps for war - THREE. Instead the releases have been uniforms, weapons and calling cards which add ZERO TO THE GAME PLAY. Second, the lobby is setup with features that don't exist -in a word - THEFT. First, the game is a buggy pile of garbage. The hit markers mean nothing and then of course the bullet drop is non-existent. Four months the game has been out and there are THREE maps for war - THREE. Instead the releases have been uniforms, weapons and calling cards which add ZERO TO THE GAME PLAY. Second, the lobby is setup with features that don't exist - Weapons Paint - coming soon since day one... that isn't soon. Finally, the crates for purchase are a rip off. 95% of the crates are calling cards and useless uniforms. THEFT. This is the last COD I will buy. RUN AWAY… Expand
  30. marcus_creamer
    Feb 19, 2018
    0
    I have been a COD fan for many years now. I love Hard Core Team Death Match, but I'm here to say: WWII is the worst game I have ever bought!!!!!! I hate I wasted my money on this stupid game. The maps are really awful. I will not recommend this game to anyone.
  31. urmumgay
    Apr 8, 2018
    0
    If you want a good WW2 CoD game, literally just play World at War. This game is incomplete (WITH A 3 YEAR DEVELOPMENT) and is just a watered down W@W.
  32. Avionic7779x
    Dec 30, 2019
    0
    Probably one of the worst WWII games out there. History wise, it makes almost no sense. The game play of the campaign is so linear it's not even funny. Sections of the campaign where you play as a tank or a plane are horrible. The tank section has you take so many hits from shells that should go right through your tank its not even funny. The plane section is just boring. The campaign alsoProbably one of the worst WWII games out there. History wise, it makes almost no sense. The game play of the campaign is so linear it's not even funny. Sections of the campaign where you play as a tank or a plane are horrible. The tank section has you take so many hits from shells that should go right through your tank its not even funny. The plane section is just boring. The campaign also only follows ONE PERSON. On ONE SIDE, fighting ONE ENEMY. This is World War II. A war that took place on all fronts of the globe. So why only have us play the Americans vs German side. There is also no variety (you just shoot Germans). The "stealth" sections are small and barely cut into the game play. The campaign is also very generic (American kid goes to war, makes buddies, makes enemies with A-hole sergeant, and learns his wife is pregnant). Like seriously, how generic can you get. Now let me talk MP. Match making is as slow as the US communications during the actual war. the guns sound like they were all made in a knockoff warehouse rather than a German or american factory. They sound so bad that it doesn't even sound like warfare, more like an Airsoft fight. The multiplayer just has you run around 3 lane maps with no cover or any style (honestly all the maps feel the same). And yes, I like Gustav cannon as it is a WWII map that makes sense. Battles weren't fought in 3 lane areas, it was fought over massive plots of land or large strategic points. I'm not even going to touch loot boxes but they're there, as well as Zombies, as I don't ply too much of it. Bottom line is that if you want a good WWII game, don't buy this garbage. Campaign wise, World at War or even COD 2 is far superior. This was $60 down the drain.… Expand
  33. Cooper2
    Nov 28, 2020
    0
    **** **** game you seriously need to work on balancing hear guns when a grease gun Is able to 2 shot Boddy shot but a PPSH with 6 bullets can't kill someone. **** off and fix this ****
next
Page:

Awards & Rankings

52
#52 Best Xbox One Game of 2017
8
#8 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2017
6
#6 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 21
  3. Negative: 0 out of 21
  1. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2017
    80
    A streamlined multiplayer and less gimmicky single-player gives CoD a nice refresh.
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 10, 2017
    70
    At its best it's a game of tactics for even the most casual player. [Issue#314, p.112]
  3. The Sydney Morning Herald
    Nov 29, 2017
    70
    This is another fun, fleeting, exceptionally good-looking Call of Duty game, but its World War II theme doesn't add much besides bringing some of its mechanics back down to Earth.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »