Call of Duty: WWII

 Xbox One
User Score
5.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 520 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 193 out of 520
  2. Mixed: 89 out of 520
  3. Negative: 238 out of 520
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Awanka
    May 7, 2023
    3
    I can't comment on the multiplayer, but the single-player campaign is among the most generic paint-by-numbers FPS gameplay I've ever encountered. Cinematic, and graphically pleasing? Yes, and also completely soul-less and devoid of any real emotion, as if it was created by Hollywood committee.

    The game does an admirable job of making you feel like you're a part of a war with many    I can't comment on the multiplayer, but the single-player campaign is among the most generic paint-by-numbers FPS gameplay I've ever encountered. Cinematic, and graphically pleasing? Yes, and also completely soul-less and devoid of any real emotion, as if it was created by Hollywood committee.

    The game does an admirable job of making you feel like you're a part of a war with many combatants on screen, but it is undermined by the sloppy frustrating combat. You don't know who is firing at you half the time. The last mission is one of the most terribly designed levels I've ever encountered, with rockets fired at you that you can't dodge, and so much smoke everywhere that you can't see the enemy. They've also brought back the egregious use of quick-time events, and added what are essentially terrible escort missions in the way of dragging wounded soldiers to safety. This is not what the genre was missing, and feels like a step backwards.    … Expand
  2. DarCbrGr
    Jun 26, 2021
    4
    Wowie this is bad. The campaign is the most forgettable and generic in the whole series, the multiplayer gets stale quickly, and the zombies mode is bland and not a ton of fun. I really don't like this game.
  3. Jaytonitus
    Apr 5, 2021
    2
    This game is probably the worst Call of Duty that I've played in every sense of the word. It was a shame I got suckered into this for $120 as a pre-release, thinking it might have some redeemable quality, but compared to most other Call of Duties, it does not. I'll be going into the 3 main components of the game, and I've played this for 130 hours to 100% the game.

    Campaign: Now there    This game is probably the worst Call of Duty that I've played in every sense of the word. It was a shame I got suckered into this for $120 as a pre-release, thinking it might have some redeemable quality, but compared to most other Call of Duties, it does not. I'll be going into the 3 main components of the game, and I've played this for 130 hours to 100% the game.

    Campaign: Now there are some good things here. The cutscenes are fantastic, the health packs are a nice way to change up the COD formula, and it has some touching moments. However, that doesn't even come close to making it worth to play. Veteran is a challenge because of the context, and it isn't unfair in most areas. However it feels exactly like Halo, where you're a one man army mowing down enemies, while your crew doesn't do much unless you tell them to push or give you an item. The collectibles are laughable, the characters don't really feel like much and give little to no motivation for us to move on. The conflict is USA vs Germany. No other countries, when the game is based on the LARGEST WAR THE WORLD HAS SEEN with THE MOST COUNTRIES. The game also doesn't have the ability to use certain elements that were in WW2. But besides the point, the campaign is on of the reasons I played Call of Duty, and this one is very underwhelming to say the least.

    Multiplayer: It's one of the most boring multiplayer experiences in COD history. Barely any guns on launch, can't get more without coughing up money it seems, and the lootboxes make the game even worse. The social space has no reason to exist, though I do like some of the things it did, like testing out killstreaks, guns, and 1v1'ing friends. Other than that, any other COD will give you a better experience and more worth for your money.

    Zombies: I enjoyed every other game's zombies to some degree (excluding Advanced Warfare), but this one is the worst of all of them so far. The maps are so dark for no apparent reason in the beginning, the boss zombies are just the worst in the franchise's history, and the Easter Eggs are grindy and non-sensical for the most part. The gun play is garbage and every weapon feels terrible. It's boring, not fun, uninspired, not worth it for any zombies player.

    In conclusion: This game is worth $5-$10 at most. The amount of effort that went into this game is appalling, and the priorities of the development team are clearly towards money rather than a good game. A disappointment for everyone who played or bought the game.    … Expand
  4. DausenMoore
    Dec 7, 2020
    2
    I barely touched WW2 because it was so bad. It's easily my most hated CoD of all time and I genuinely have a hard time thinking of anything positive to say about it. Bad maps, bad gameplay, bad almost everything. I am aware it received a lot of improvements after I quit though so it may be worth trying now.
  5. Cooper2
    Nov 28, 2020
    0
    **** **** game you seriously need to work on balancing hear guns when a grease gun Is able to 2 shot Boddy shot but a PPSH with 6 bullets can't kill someone. **** off and fix this ****
  6. Yaboihasataco
    Jul 17, 2020
    3
    The game was just a disappointment. Almost everything except for graphics and sound fall behind world at war. The campaign was alright, but so linear. The characters were decent and the twist was cool, but not unique at all and was so shallow. The campaign could have been a gritty and realistic take on WW2, but wasn’t. The multiplayer was even worse. The customization was funded down soThe game was just a disappointment. Almost everything except for graphics and sound fall behind world at war. The campaign was alright, but so linear. The characters were decent and the twist was cool, but not unique at all and was so shallow. The campaign could have been a gritty and realistic take on WW2, but wasn’t. The multiplayer was even worse. The customization was funded down so much it hurts. The maps were so derivative and annoyingly simple . The modes it offered were just not up to snuff with the better games in the series. The nazi zombies mode was also terrible because the characters aware uninteresting and don’t have memorable lines. Just an example of missing the mark as a whole.… Expand
  7. PalpetineSheev
    Mar 20, 2020
    4
    It's... bad. There's no other way around it. This game is bad. The lootboxes, poor customization, weak singleplayer story, horrid multiplayer maps, and a bare bones zombie mode make this possibly the worst Call of Duty so far (although I still haven't played BO4). This is the game that made me swear an oath to never pre-order a game.
  8. Avionic7779x
    Dec 30, 2019
    0
    Probably one of the worst WWII games out there. History wise, it makes almost no sense. The game play of the campaign is so linear it's not even funny. Sections of the campaign where you play as a tank or a plane are horrible. The tank section has you take so many hits from shells that should go right through your tank its not even funny. The plane section is just boring. The campaign alsoProbably one of the worst WWII games out there. History wise, it makes almost no sense. The game play of the campaign is so linear it's not even funny. Sections of the campaign where you play as a tank or a plane are horrible. The tank section has you take so many hits from shells that should go right through your tank its not even funny. The plane section is just boring. The campaign also only follows ONE PERSON. On ONE SIDE, fighting ONE ENEMY. This is World War II. A war that took place on all fronts of the globe. So why only have us play the Americans vs German side. There is also no variety (you just shoot Germans). The "stealth" sections are small and barely cut into the game play. The campaign is also very generic (American kid goes to war, makes buddies, makes enemies with A-hole sergeant, and learns his wife is pregnant). Like seriously, how generic can you get. Now let me talk MP. Match making is as slow as the US communications during the actual war. the guns sound like they were all made in a knockoff warehouse rather than a German or american factory. They sound so bad that it doesn't even sound like warfare, more like an Airsoft fight. The multiplayer just has you run around 3 lane maps with no cover or any style (honestly all the maps feel the same). And yes, I like Gustav cannon as it is a WWII map that makes sense. Battles weren't fought in 3 lane areas, it was fought over massive plots of land or large strategic points. I'm not even going to touch loot boxes but they're there, as well as Zombies, as I don't ply too much of it. Bottom line is that if you want a good WWII game, don't buy this garbage. Campaign wise, World at War or even COD 2 is far superior. This was $60 down the drain.… Expand
  9. OscarAdcock
    Nov 11, 2019
    0
    It’s actually the worst, just not enjoyable for me in any way with friends or solo.
    They made a mockery of WW2 and Sledghammer as a credible developer, **** this game...
  10. Critine
    Oct 11, 2019
    4
    Campaign: 10
    Multiplayer: 0
    Zombies: 3
    Average: 4.3

    Players will ask what went wrong in COD WW2, and that’s a shame. Even if it does have an awesome campaign that you can probably watch on YouTube, it’s plagued by an awful zombies experience and decaying multiplayer.
  11. Wander22
    Feb 17, 2019
    4
    Gameplay/Mechanics: 6
    Sound/Music: 8
    Graphics/Art: 8.5 Story/Atmosphere: 1 OVERALL: 4/10 Concentration camps and the holocaust covered in a call of duty campaign?? ill-conceived and very ignorant. In a game where you shoot each other dead with tie dye grenade launchers and wacko killstreaks, this subject matter should not be within a 1000 feet of this game's narrative. The tone is    Gameplay/Mechanics: 6
    Sound/Music: 8
    Graphics/Art: 8.5
    Story/Atmosphere: 1
    OVERALL: 4/10

    Concentration camps and the holocaust covered in a call of duty campaign?? ill-conceived and very ignorant. In a game where you shoot each other dead with tie dye grenade launchers and wacko killstreaks, this subject matter should not be within a 1000 feet of this game's narrative. The tone is completely incoherent. Severe missteps on Sledgehammer's part. The characters/story all showed promise up until the very end, which is even more disappointing. Multiplayer is riddled with microtransaction/loot box garbage and overall isn't a very solid experience even to play. The campaign does have a few really cool moments, and the technical aspects of the game are quite impressive, but overall this game is an misguided mess.    … Expand
  12. Broyax
    Feb 7, 2019
    1
    Voici l'Appel du Devoir numéro 425621556 dont le sujet se déroule cette fois pendant la Seconde Guerre Mondiale... comme un certain Appel du Devoir 2 il y a des lunes et des lunes ! quelle originalité, les bras nous en tombent et nous en restons bouche bée.

    C'est reparti donc comme en 40 ou 44 plutôt pour sauver le monde libre mais occupé et comme jadis, c'est la foire aux scripts dans    Voici l'Appel du Devoir numéro 425621556 dont le sujet se déroule cette fois pendant la Seconde Guerre Mondiale... comme un certain Appel du Devoir 2 il y a des lunes et des lunes ! quelle originalité, les bras nous en tombent et nous en restons bouche bée.

    C'est reparti donc comme en 40 ou 44 plutôt pour sauver le monde libre mais occupé et comme jadis, c'est la foire aux scripts dans ce jeu-couloir certes spectaculaire mais rapidement aussi ennuyeux qu'un discours à l'Assemblée. En vérité, on s'ennuie si vite qu'on envoit des SMS et qu'on lâche des "kikoos" sur les réseaux sochiasses.

    Aux scripts innombrables viennent se greffer des saloperies de QTE et si la vie ne remonte plus toute seule (incroyable...) si on peut utiliser des trousses de soin, le jeu reste fidèle à lui-même, entièrement suspendu à votre bon vouloir, car la guerre c'est vous qui allez la gagner et personne d'autre : tant que vous ne percutez pas le script qui déclenche l'évènement suivant, les ennemis et vos copains se mettent sur la gueule et ressuscitent en masse ad vitam eternam comme des **** bots coincés dans une boucle. C'est assez risible à voir !

    On reste en tout cas souvent à l'étroit dans ces niveaux et la jouabilité n'a pas évolué d'un iota pour sa part : épaulez, visez et visez surtout la tête parce que sinon il en faudra des bastos pour les zigouiller ces andouilles ! De toute façon, on a jamais l'impression de vraiment jouer mais d'être coincé dans un caddy de supermarché lancé à grande vitesse avec des dialogues écrits par la ménagère de moins de 50 ans.

    Même le bilan technique qui devrait être bon, voire très bon, ne l'est pas totalement... En effet, si on a la 4K à 60 im/s (sur la X), toutes les cinématiques semblent soit à 30, soit victimes de sévères ralentissements... Le jeu reste terne (à tous les égards d'ailleurs) et depuis cet abruti de Soldat Ryan, toutes les oeuvres "modernes" sur la WWII veulent nous faire croire que les vaillants soldats étaient daltoniens.

    Enfin, je ne comprends pas pourquoi ce retour sur la WWII qui commence à sentir le réchauffé... remarquez, parler de "réchauffé" à propos d'un Call of est un pléonasme doublé d'une lapalissade. On dit que la guerre est terrible et c'est vrai : terriblement ennuyeuse et percluse de rhumatismes comme ce Call of qui n'en peut plus : achevez-le et enterrez-le dans le désert, qu'on en parle plus !    … Expand
  13. ItzClockWork
    Nov 23, 2018
    2
    Historically inaccurate, winding storyline, absurd game play. I already sold my copy to buy a better game. Don't waste your money.
  14. weirdmagican21
    Jul 3, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. awful i thought this was gonna be the cod i got to max level on but it was not because of the connection issues and loading problems this is the last call of duty i am buying and the game made 500 million dollars and yet they still put loot boxes in it.… Expand
  15. Emperor_Unicorn
    Jun 2, 2018
    1
    The Campaign Mode was okay... Nazi Zombies is fun with friends.

    The Multiplayer? I'm never buying another Call of Duty title every again. Not unless they actually bring about dedicated servers. Every single matching having one to two players that are moving 1.5x faster than everyone else, just mopping up kills is no fun. I'd recommend buying this this game up when it's $20 or less,    The Campaign Mode was okay... Nazi Zombies is fun with friends.

    The Multiplayer? I'm never buying another Call of Duty title every again. Not unless they actually bring about dedicated servers. Every single matching having one to two players that are moving 1.5x faster than everyone else, just mopping up kills is no fun.

    I'd recommend buying this this game up when it's $20 or less, or rent it and see what you think.    … Expand
  16. koolaidman486
    Apr 26, 2018
    0
    Call of Duty World War 2 is the single worst video game that I have ever played. Every single "professional" reviewer is wrong here.
    Campaign:
    Generic One theatre of the war Bland Literally MW3 but in World War 2 without any of the character Zombies: Flat downgrade to Treyarch and Infinity Ward in almost every way, fails at being scary or fun. Multiplayer: Connections are ****    Call of Duty World War 2 is the single worst video game that I have ever played. Every single "professional" reviewer is wrong here.
    Campaign:
    Generic
    One theatre of the war
    Bland
    Literally MW3 but in World War 2 without any of the character

    Zombies:
    Flat downgrade to Treyarch and Infinity Ward in almost every way, fails at being scary or fun.

    Multiplayer:
    Connections are ****
    Balance is far and away the worst in the series
    DLC weapons are way too common (close to as many or more than Infinite Warfare during that game's entire cycle, and this game is 6 months in as of me posting this).
    You will unload on people and have them take 0 hits, multiple times a match
    You will be shot around corners
    The division system is complete trash when compared to Pic 10 and the classic system
    Maps are mostly bland, boring, samey, and generally terrible
    Spawns are laughable

    Yeah, I will under zero circumstances recommend this game to anybody. If you want a frustrating and overall crap experience, this is the game for you, even then, Ghosts will only cost you $15 so go for the miserable experience that actually works, not this pile of literal garbage.    … Expand
  17. Physastra
    Apr 21, 2018
    2
    BORing, bland , ordinary. This game is possibly the worst cod ever. All the reviews from last year were completely blinded by the hype and nostalgia for botg. Don’t be fooled, this game has zero innovation. It has stepped backwards in almost every aspect of the game. It’s just not fun to play. The maps are dire, the weapons are boring, the scorestreaks are terrible.
    The people giving    BORing, bland , ordinary. This game is possibly the worst cod ever. All the reviews from last year were completely blinded by the hype and nostalgia for botg. Don’t be fooled, this game has zero innovation. It has stepped backwards in almost every aspect of the game. It’s just not fun to play. The maps are dire, the weapons are boring, the scorestreaks are terrible.
    The people giving this a 10/10 should take a long hard look at themselves!    … Expand
  18. urmumgay
    Apr 8, 2018
    0
    If you want a good WW2 CoD game, literally just play World at War. This game is incomplete (WITH A 3 YEAR DEVELOPMENT) and is just a watered down W@W.
  19. skidzilla
    Mar 23, 2018
    1
    this game is crap utter crap, like for them to give this game a 80 makes me wonder whom is on the take ....
  20. marcus_creamer
    Feb 19, 2018
    0
    I have been a COD fan for many years now. I love Hard Core Team Death Match, but I'm here to say: WWII is the worst game I have ever bought!!!!!! I hate I wasted my money on this stupid game. The maps are really awful. I will not recommend this game to anyone.
  21. bsg0075
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    in a word - THEFT. First, the game is a buggy pile of garbage. The hit markers mean nothing and then of course the bullet drop is non-existent. Four months the game has been out and there are THREE maps for war - THREE. Instead the releases have been uniforms, weapons and calling cards which add ZERO TO THE GAME PLAY. Second, the lobby is setup with features that don't exist -in a word - THEFT. First, the game is a buggy pile of garbage. The hit markers mean nothing and then of course the bullet drop is non-existent. Four months the game has been out and there are THREE maps for war - THREE. Instead the releases have been uniforms, weapons and calling cards which add ZERO TO THE GAME PLAY. Second, the lobby is setup with features that don't exist - Weapons Paint - coming soon since day one... that isn't soon. Finally, the crates for purchase are a rip off. 95% of the crates are calling cards and useless uniforms. THEFT. This is the last COD I will buy. RUN AWAY… Expand
  22. RamboDash
    Jan 20, 2018
    3
    Bottom line: it's just a bad game.

    I got sick of call of duty after MW2. I grew up with the franchise and had been playing since COD 2. I've been playing mostly Battlefield since 2013, but when I heard COD was ditching the futuristic and was heading back to WW2 I was interested. But it really is just more of the same with a WW2 skin. I thought modern warfare 2 was too fast, but this is    Bottom line: it's just a bad game.

    I got sick of call of duty after MW2. I grew up with the franchise and had been playing since COD 2. I've been playing mostly Battlefield since 2013, but when I heard COD was ditching the futuristic and was heading back to WW2 I was interested. But it really is just more of the same with a WW2 skin. I thought modern warfare 2 was too fast, but this is ridiculous. The game feels like a round of speedball with everyone on crack. Waaay too fast. waaaay too reliant on how fast you can get your sights on and pull the trigger than actual teamwork. Waaaay too easy to die and know exactly where your enemy is going after your death. There's things you begin to take for granted when you switch over to a game like battlefield - destructible environments, different classes that actually PLAY differently, vehicles, large maps, more team play... I could go on. The game feels like it caters to hormonal teenage boys.

    This game is very easy to hate. Very easy to laugh at. And for very good reason. I didn't buy the last 6 call of duty games before this and I will never buy another one after. I've learned my lesson.    … Expand
  23. leltrollface
    Jan 19, 2018
    0
    This game is very"weird". sometimes its fun, other times you feel like screaming at your TV or monitor.

    CAMPAIGN. The campaign is all over the place.My favorite mission in this "campaign" is the first mission. if the first mission is the only good mission, thats when you have just **** up big time. I legit forgot the ending, but i dont need to know the ending to know what its gonna    This game is very"weird". sometimes its fun, other times you feel like screaming at your TV or monitor.

    CAMPAIGN.

    The campaign is all over the place.My favorite mission in this "campaign" is the first mission. if the first mission is the only good mission, thats when you have just **** up big time. I legit forgot the ending, but i dont need to know the ending to know what its gonna be. Its gonna end all like your the best and no one else could have done what you did. the "campaign" feels more like im watching a on rails movie then a actual game. The amount of explosions in the "campaign" felt like i was watching a battle unfold in fallout 4 if they all had fat mans.

    ZOMBIES.

    Zombies is actually really underrated. I mean, i know it do'sent really have anything special about it but if you think about it, neither did nacth dier untoten from WAW, same with verrtuck, shi no numa, and kino der toten. people always say those are the best maps ever, but they only say that because its treyarch. Like the "campaign" theirs a lot of explosions . Im actually okay with it because its made up so i dont give a **** now lets go into the biggest part of the game yet, the reason you bought this ****ing game.

    MULTI--wait i gotta wait for a update? k.
    *1 hour later*
    MULTIPLAYER.

    Multiplayer is really unbalanced. i mean all of these "nerf's" and "buffs" really do nothing. so what if they nerfed the STG or the FG42, those guns are still really overpowered. the maps are all the same in this game, left middle right.The new DLC guns are trash, the gewher 43 is like a m1a1 carbine, the sten is like a **** version of the grease gun, the GPMG is worse then pre-buffed Bren, the Ice Pick needs a little more range, the trench knifve is ok. my favriote map is opetation neptune. and thats it. TA TA, ****    … Expand
  24. JustMK
    Dec 30, 2017
    1
    Boringest Call of Duty that put me into sleep with first minutes of gameplay. I really liked Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare for their awesome futuristing setting, and I completely bored, annoyed of WWII theme in 2000's.
    I want back AW/IW-like CoD games. That was awesome
  25. B5HARP
    Dec 27, 2017
    3
    Game is garbage, i only gave it a 3 because once it does let you play, it's a fun experience. I timed it and it takes upwards of 20 minutes from loading the game to actually being able to play it. As if Sledgehammer doesn't have enough to deal with after the horrible launch and crappy servers, they also need to address cheaters. Folks using modded controllers in order to dive down withGame is garbage, i only gave it a 3 because once it does let you play, it's a fun experience. I timed it and it takes upwards of 20 minutes from loading the game to actually being able to play it. As if Sledgehammer doesn't have enough to deal with after the horrible launch and crappy servers, they also need to address cheaters. Folks using modded controllers in order to dive down with lightning speed once you're shooting them is just dumb. The quick scoping with the sniper rifles is also a joke. If they wanted this game to be a close to realistic as they set out to do, they would stop this completely. No where in the history of wars are there snipers that run and gun. You have to put your eye on the scope and then take your shot. One of these developers one of these days needs to address this. Campaign is great. Good story amazing graphics, but online waiting, load times and cheaters make this game a bad one. When crtiics rate it at 80 and users have it at 3.9 it really tells you about the paid to rate critic situation. Stay away from this game.… Expand
  26. MollyMagoo
    Dec 21, 2017
    1
    WORST COD OF ALL TIME. I generously give it one point for removing jet packs. I've played a lot of COD's. Some I loved, some I liked, some I didn't like. This is the first one I hate. I want my money back. I feel cheated. Multiplayer is an absolute **** show. Activision buys its servers at local garage sales, and hires high school drop-outs and homeless people to run them. Only 9WORST COD OF ALL TIME. I generously give it one point for removing jet packs. I've played a lot of COD's. Some I loved, some I liked, some I didn't like. This is the first one I hate. I want my money back. I feel cheated. Multiplayer is an absolute **** show. Activision buys its servers at local garage sales, and hires high school drop-outs and homeless people to run them. Only 9 multiplayer maps at launch, and 7 of them suck. The other 2 aren't very good either. If someone tells you the 3 War mode maps count as multiplayer maps, spit in their face. This game is utterly devoid of content and any sort of personality. The new divisions system is **** Sprint distances/sprint out times are **** This game does everything it can to punish you for trying to enjoy COD as we've always known it.. Don't waste your time or money on this trash. I will never buy another Sledgehammer COD.… Expand
  27. Davis5018
    Dec 16, 2017
    0
    Let me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hopeLet me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hope sledgehammer reads this. Don't waste your money. I'd rather play hacked lobbies on MW2 than play COD ww2 ever again in my life. Can't believe I wasted 60 dollars on this piece of crap game. I say again, don't waste your money on this garbage game.… Expand
  28. Baldpubis
    Dec 12, 2017
    0
    Remember the first 27 times they made this exact same game? Yeah. Those were great. Shooting people in the face and watching their blood squirt across the screen almost never gets old. But then it does. And now it is. Yawn.
  29. Roblaw
    Dec 8, 2017
    3
    The campaign is fairly engaging, but where the game really falls flat is the multiplayer. Maps are dull and one-dimensional, and prone to failed finishing (can't jump on a two foot ledge - walls are uniformly flat. The game is built for the "run and gun" mindless shooter crowd, with very little nuance or strategy. The pinnacle, really was, Ghosts, and it's been a sad effort since then.The campaign is fairly engaging, but where the game really falls flat is the multiplayer. Maps are dull and one-dimensional, and prone to failed finishing (can't jump on a two foot ledge - walls are uniformly flat. The game is built for the "run and gun" mindless shooter crowd, with very little nuance or strategy. The pinnacle, really was, Ghosts, and it's been a sad effort since then. Probably my last COD purchase.… Expand
  30. yazman
    Dec 3, 2017
    2
    What a dissapointment, this is it COD needs a new engine ASAP, for me personally i am done with the franchise. COD WW2 is so weak in so many fronts i dont know where to start. Id say the campaign is the only thing id save here. Plot is solid in comparison to previous games and overall you underatand what you are doing. But we all know that the bread and butter here is the multiplayer andWhat a dissapointment, this is it COD needs a new engine ASAP, for me personally i am done with the franchise. COD WW2 is so weak in so many fronts i dont know where to start. Id say the campaign is the only thing id save here. Plot is solid in comparison to previous games and overall you underatand what you are doing. But we all know that the bread and butter here is the multiplayer and that one is , well just a mess for starters the game looks HORRIBLE i really dont understand how they keep using this ancient engine and then mask it with huge advertising campaigns and pre-rendered footage. These maps are disastrous, so small i dont even understand why they include scope snipers. Game physics are so poor or non existent weapons feel toyish and the pace of the game is just off for the ww2 setting maybe too fast. I am really dissapointed i feel sorry for sledgehammer cuz they put their best into it but again the games looks from last gen big time.… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

52
#52 Best Xbox One Game of 2017
8
#8 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2017
6
#6 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 21
  3. Negative: 0 out of 21
  1. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2017
    80
    A streamlined multiplayer and less gimmicky single-player gives CoD a nice refresh.
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 10, 2017
    70
    At its best it's a game of tactics for even the most casual player. [Issue#314, p.112]
  3. The Sydney Morning Herald
    Nov 29, 2017
    70
    This is another fun, fleeting, exceptionally good-looking Call of Duty game, but its World War II theme doesn't add much besides bringing some of its mechanics back down to Earth.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »