Call of Duty: WWII

 Xbox One
User Score
5.0

Mixed or average reviews- based on 520 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 193 out of 520
  2. Mixed: 89 out of 520
  3. Negative: 238 out of 520
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Xbox_Alive
    Jan 2, 2018
    9
    I was actually quite a fan of Infinite Warfare and I found it to be a pleasant change in the Call of Duty series, but at times I must admit that it did miss a certain something. Thankfully Call of Duty: WWII brings that certain something back to the series and I must admit that this is one of the best Call of Duty’s I’ve played in years. The boots on ground combat is back and it’sI was actually quite a fan of Infinite Warfare and I found it to be a pleasant change in the Call of Duty series, but at times I must admit that it did miss a certain something. Thankfully Call of Duty: WWII brings that certain something back to the series and I must admit that this is one of the best Call of Duty’s I’ve played in years. The boots on ground combat is back and it’s addictive as ever and the main reason for that is because it’s exciting throughout. Another reason why it’s so enjoyable is because of the improved gunplay, which I found to be more precise and responsive than it was in Infinite Warfare. Without a doubt this game is packed to the brim with content and they’ve even included some new modes, which by the way are brilliant and a great addition to the franchise. Multiplayer also has a lot of content and once again it’s addictive as ever, and the best thing is that I’ve suffered with no problems online to date. If you’re not a massive fan of multiplayer then you will be pleased to know that the game offers you a very good single player campaign. The campaign has been done really well and it really gives you an insight into some of the events that happened in WWII, I will say however that I would have liked a bit more variety when it came to the missions. The presentation side of the game is absolutely fantastic. Visually the game looks superb the whole way through and the voice actors really made the game even more of an immersive and enjoyable experience. At the end of the day fans of the Call of Duty series will be extremely pleased with the new addition to the genre, and I must applaud the amount of effort that has gone into Call of Duty: WWII. Without a doubt it’s clear that the developers/publishers have listened to fans of the series and tried to improve every key area, and the best thing is that these improvements have created one of the best Call of Duty game’s in years. Call of Duty: WWII has in my opinion made the series relevant again and I can’t recommend it enough.… Expand
  2. yazman
    Dec 3, 2017
    2
    What a dissapointment, this is it COD needs a new engine ASAP, for me personally i am done with the franchise. COD WW2 is so weak in so many fronts i dont know where to start. Id say the campaign is the only thing id save here. Plot is solid in comparison to previous games and overall you underatand what you are doing. But we all know that the bread and butter here is the multiplayer andWhat a dissapointment, this is it COD needs a new engine ASAP, for me personally i am done with the franchise. COD WW2 is so weak in so many fronts i dont know where to start. Id say the campaign is the only thing id save here. Plot is solid in comparison to previous games and overall you underatand what you are doing. But we all know that the bread and butter here is the multiplayer and that one is , well just a mess for starters the game looks HORRIBLE i really dont understand how they keep using this ancient engine and then mask it with huge advertising campaigns and pre-rendered footage. These maps are disastrous, so small i dont even understand why they include scope snipers. Game physics are so poor or non existent weapons feel toyish and the pace of the game is just off for the ww2 setting maybe too fast. I am really dissapointed i feel sorry for sledgehammer cuz they put their best into it but again the games looks from last gen big time.… Expand
  3. GaldinoKohler
    Nov 14, 2017
    0
    Who cares about campaign? I don't. It might be good or not. We buy COD because we get to play the online multiplayer. Which seems to be awesome this time. No more jetpacking, no more people flying in the sky. But there is a caveat: Matchmaking is not functional. That's it. Totally bugged. 
    I've waited 20 minutes trying everything I could to get one match. Then I've entered in a game in    Who cares about campaign? I don't. It might be good or not. We buy COD because we get to play the online multiplayer. Which seems to be awesome this time. No more jetpacking, no more people flying in the sky. But there is a caveat: Matchmaking is not functional. That's it. Totally bugged. 
    I've waited 20 minutes trying everything I could to get one match. Then I've entered in a game in progress in a team being stomped.
    This is jut not fun at all... Hard-worked money throwed in a trash bin, that's how I feel. 
    By the way, I have a good cabled connection, up-to-date router and all that. Brazil, Xbox One here. I feel other platforms are also affected.
    Feels really bad.    … Expand
  4. Bruno1943
    Nov 11, 2017
    4
    After the sophistication of previous games the recent WW2 is a significant disappointment. Restricted playing field, less than believable characters and generally second rate graphics. Also, way too short for the price. I recall that even the old 'World at War' had a more usable playing field and compared to (EG) Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (which in my opinion is a classic!) thisAfter the sophistication of previous games the recent WW2 is a significant disappointment. Restricted playing field, less than believable characters and generally second rate graphics. Also, way too short for the price. I recall that even the old 'World at War' had a more usable playing field and compared to (EG) Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (which in my opinion is a classic!) this product is very second rate. A great disappointment! and whichever team was responsible for this one needs a wake-up call.… Expand
  5. discman
    Nov 13, 2017
    4
    The setting is "new" but it's still a modern CoD. The campaign is actually much better than the last games but the multiplayer is still not classic CoD. This doesn't have to be a bad thing if you like it but the developers always said "classic CoD" so I expected it and was disappointed.
  6. nate024
    Nov 14, 2017
    3
    Quick summary: The game is a bug-ridden disaster almost 2 weeks after launch. HQ, one of the main selling points of the game, is still disabled. The lobbies are very unstable, and you will constantly have to back out and close the app when your party gets separated. Zombies is fun if that is your thing, as it is very similar to past installments. And lastly campaign, is very forgettable.Quick summary: The game is a bug-ridden disaster almost 2 weeks after launch. HQ, one of the main selling points of the game, is still disabled. The lobbies are very unstable, and you will constantly have to back out and close the app when your party gets separated. Zombies is fun if that is your thing, as it is very similar to past installments. And lastly campaign, is very forgettable. The epic scale and theater of war in WW2 is nowhere found as there are essentially 4 main characters that you don't care about. You go from shooting gallery to shooting gallery only for it to just.... end.

    I was gonna write a more in depth review, but I dont think the game deserves it in its current state. Multiplayer is in shambles. As I mentioned above, playing with friends is broken. Lag compensation is broken, making firefights just a dice roll more than anything else. Only 9 maps?! The game in general is lacking any sort of polish or thought and the whole came gives off a strong vibe that it was rushed out the door. I don't believe for a second that this is what 3 years of development produces. Between the broken UI, and the broken netcode, this game is an insult to any CoD multiplayer fan. Just wait till Black Friday, or wait another few months until patches come out to make this even remotely resemble a $60 game.    … Expand
  7. highbynine
    Nov 21, 2017
    1
    Very disappointed in this game. I guess I missed the info. But no campaign coop?? You're telling me I can't storm the beaches of Normandy with friends? Extremely disappointing!!
  8. skidzilla
    Mar 23, 2018
    1
    this game is crap utter crap, like for them to give this game a 80 makes me wonder whom is on the take ....
  9. Wildghost68
    Nov 21, 2017
    3
    This game over all was pretty bad i mean come on the french resistance was so cringe worthy. Where the campaign ended was just dumb as all he** . Zombies was OK i guess and multiply player is so boring it isn't even funny. If you want to play with some random people online you will almost never find a match and even if you do your going to get kicked off the game around round 10-12. CodThis game over all was pretty bad i mean come on the french resistance was so cringe worthy. Where the campaign ended was just dumb as all he** . Zombies was OK i guess and multiply player is so boring it isn't even funny. If you want to play with some random people online you will almost never find a match and even if you do your going to get kicked off the game around round 10-12. Cod Get your SJW BS out of are dang games.… Expand
  10. CodGod
    Nov 14, 2017
    2
    This has to be one of the worst CODs ever. Everyone knows the launch was a complete embarrassment to Call of Duty but it's even worse than that. First of all they should be even more embarrassed to legit steal headquarters from Destiny. I mean a complete and 100% rip off. And it is not good. Then the menus are absolutely awful. Why does it take seven button presses to leave a game? 7! AndThis has to be one of the worst CODs ever. Everyone knows the launch was a complete embarrassment to Call of Duty but it's even worse than that. First of all they should be even more embarrassed to legit steal headquarters from Destiny. I mean a complete and 100% rip off. And it is not good. Then the menus are absolutely awful. Why does it take seven button presses to leave a game? 7! And why when I am in the lobby am I looking at a bunch of soldiers standing around. I canno't tell who is in a party or not. Please just show me a list of players in the lobby and the teams they are on before the match starts. Now about the create a class system. Why would you try to replace the pick 10 system. It literally is the gold standard. A near perfect system. Yet leave it to sledgehammer to kill a good thing. Why can't I put a suppressor on my AR? It makes no sense. And why when I pick a gun up that a guy was using that had a suppressor on it does it magically not have the suppressor anymore? You can no longer have stock and ghost on the same class because of this archaic system. To further that, why is stock a perk and not a gun attachment...There are so so many things wrong with this game. No dedicated servers, terrible connectivity, slowest gameplays ever. They reduced the TDM to 75 kills and still it's rare to get 75 kills in a match. Huge huge miss by activision and sledgehammer on this one.… Expand
  11. martinsll
    Nov 28, 2017
    4
    Não comprem este jogo, se estão procurando um jogo de guerra de verdade Battlefiled ou Wolfstein. As armas parecem de brinquedo, o sistema de acampamento (multiplayer) é tão confuso que até assusta. Missões e diálogos manjados, horrível !
  12. Roblaw
    Dec 8, 2017
    3
    The campaign is fairly engaging, but where the game really falls flat is the multiplayer. Maps are dull and one-dimensional, and prone to failed finishing (can't jump on a two foot ledge - walls are uniformly flat. The game is built for the "run and gun" mindless shooter crowd, with very little nuance or strategy. The pinnacle, really was, Ghosts, and it's been a sad effort since then.The campaign is fairly engaging, but where the game really falls flat is the multiplayer. Maps are dull and one-dimensional, and prone to failed finishing (can't jump on a two foot ledge - walls are uniformly flat. The game is built for the "run and gun" mindless shooter crowd, with very little nuance or strategy. The pinnacle, really was, Ghosts, and it's been a sad effort since then. Probably my last COD purchase.… Expand
  13. Baldpubis
    Dec 12, 2017
    0
    Remember the first 27 times they made this exact same game? Yeah. Those were great. Shooting people in the face and watching their blood squirt across the screen almost never gets old. But then it does. And now it is. Yawn.
  14. Davis5018
    Dec 16, 2017
    0
    Let me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hopeLet me start off by saying this game had the potential to be one of the best COD yet. But they somehow made it the worst COD I have ever played in my life... First off who in the **** made the maps for the game? There is not one good map on COD WW2, they are so garbage. Sadly I ordered this game online, if I hadn't made that mistake I would have returned it. THE MAPS SUCK, I hope sledgehammer reads this. Don't waste your money. I'd rather play hacked lobbies on MW2 than play COD ww2 ever again in my life. Can't believe I wasted 60 dollars on this piece of crap game. I say again, don't waste your money on this garbage game.… Expand
  15. Xefan
    Nov 10, 2017
    0
    This game has everything wrong with it that Call of Duty has had wrong with it since 2007, the difference is, it was acceptable then, but technology has moved on.

    The story is targeted entirely at the American audience and as a result entirely re-writes history and is grossly inaccurate almost to the point of being offensive - certainly so to anyone that actually fought in the war, what    This game has everything wrong with it that Call of Duty has had wrong with it since 2007, the difference is, it was acceptable then, but technology has moved on.

    The story is targeted entirely at the American audience and as a result entirely re-writes history and is grossly inaccurate almost to the point of being offensive - certainly so to anyone that actually fought in the war, what few of them there are left in the world for Activision to massively insult by writing their contribution out of history.

    Thus even outside of the non-working servers, the dated gameplay, the abysmal AI, the obscure fluctuations in difficulty, there is a fundamental problem in that even the single player storyline just isn't engaging simply because it's a load of functional nonsense passed off as fact.

    Activision could learn a lot from EA, whilst Battlefield 1 wasn't overly historically accurate in terms of weaponry, it's focus on the disparate storylines across the War was incredibly respectful to the countless sides who fought in it, which is far better than this insult that Activision have produced.

    This is a game from a different era, outdated technology, outdated gameplay, and outdated American exceptionalism that's well past it's sell-by date.    … Expand
  16. TomasLacerda
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped    Activision should be ashamed, clearly a move to get more money out of us. Not care to polish a decent story, nothing.
    The story is dangerously inaccurate. The characters are as predictable as every bad movie you ever seen. Lifeless, idiotic bunch. The A.I. is surprising awful for a 2017 game, even for a 2014 game would be an issue. There's no ambience to the game, constantly being stopped by irrelevant cutscenes. This game isn't made for adults.

    Don't play it.    … Expand
  17. FerPSX
    Nov 7, 2017
    2
    If SH fixes their game I will change the score.
    The game is broken, it have several issues, like input lag, hit detection, servers... and it have minor issues like emotes (the worst emotes in the past 4yrs) menus, time to wait between matches.
    I can’t believe all the bad critics to CoD IW from the CoD community (haters doesn’t count, they hate every CoD), infinity Ward made a better    If SH fixes their game I will change the score.
    The game is broken, it have several issues, like input lag, hit detection, servers... and it have minor issues like emotes (the worst emotes in the past 4yrs) menus, time to wait between matches.
    I can’t believe all the bad critics to CoD IW from the CoD community (haters doesn’t count, they hate every CoD), infinity Ward made a better game than CoD WWII, at least a complete game.    … Expand
  18. LabiusMaximus
    Nov 12, 2017
    2
    Never thought I'd see the day when the gaming critics end up bought and paid for. Here we are. Over and over the critics giving a high score to crap games with an A+ in champagne left politics. Saving a Jewess from the SS for example. Since when was this anyone's COD? I'd rather save my cash. Has the franchise been bought enough to vitiate the original game into a political football forNever thought I'd see the day when the gaming critics end up bought and paid for. Here we are. Over and over the critics giving a high score to crap games with an A+ in champagne left politics. Saving a Jewess from the SS for example. Since when was this anyone's COD? I'd rather save my cash. Has the franchise been bought enough to vitiate the original game into a political football for people who can't help themselves? Are you that bloody minded to put your politics supraordinate to the heart of a game, which is gaming, to the point where the game sucks? Here we also have historical rewriting to be more PC across the board. The Nazis made no bones about enslaving and killing off the Untermensch, with nazi peasant soldiers each allocated 120 hectares of the conquered lands in Generalplanost. Their blood and soul ethos. You won't see it here in this fanciful PC schmaltz hoping for end user$$$. Equally, the Jewish Bolsheviks fomented civil discord in a hellish way in Germany and not only Germany. The Germans had their strong views and so did the Jewish Marxists of the Soviet Nomenklatura and Comintern. Full on war was the outcome. As for us, good gaming was always irreverent and above all about gaming, amplifying these historical absurdities, not cucking, no kowtow. Amplifying! It needs to said three times. Games are about gaming, ie competition, which is totally nonPC! This is another example of sequels in the ever more oppressive framework we all live in. What a shame. Looks like the only highlights this year are racing games. Hope RDR doesn't take a turn to the left, but not holding my breath after "that" scene in zombie mode. Too much time spent on perfecting PC and much less on the game itself, as per other reviews. So sad as I was really looking forward to this, after playing the first COD and all of them before the rubbish futurist ones.… Expand
  19. Allthat
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit    This game is not a true return to the glory days of Call of Duty like everyone said it would be. Setting it during WW2 didn't really do much since it feels exactly like the last few CoD games. Micro-transactions and loot boxes never existed during CoD's true glory days, yet they play a huge role in this entry.

    There is a Destiny style social space that makes no sense. There's no benefit to having this feature apart from showing off to everyone what you get from loot boxes. This allows Activision to bank on other players jealousy and sell even more loot boxes.

    The historical inaccuracies are really insulting too. Red dot sights and hollow sights did not exist during WW2, soldiers weren't allowed to wear colorful uniforms yet this game allows you to buy weird skins that dont fit warfare or even the time period, AND WHY ARE THERE BLACK NAZIS? This is insulting to black people. Nazis were openly racist and I wouldn't want to dress up as someone who committed major atrocities against my race.

    Swastikas are censored BTW. And you can play as female soldiers just as easily as male ones. SJWs have hit the gaming industry really hard.

    Not gonna talk about zombies cause I'm tired of shooting zombies. ENOUGH ZOMBIES.

    Campaign has a very good story and characters are interesting, but its too short. 6 hours is too little and this game was clearly developed multiplayer first with single-player as an afterthought. I won't be surprised when the day comes that CoD ships without a single player campaign.

    DONT BUY THIS. LETS CHANGE THE INDUSTRY WE LOVE. VOTE WITH YOUR WALLET.    … Expand
  20. AngryShark92
    Nov 12, 2017
    4
    Call of Duty, oh boy. This series has been around for nearly 15 years, and year after year they release a new instalment that sells solely based on hype. I was idiotic enough to buy into the hype because of my love for COD 2 and WAW, and now I obviously regret it.

    Basically, this COD was meant to be a nod to the games of old with a bs tagline of "Get your old squad back together". Well,    Call of Duty, oh boy. This series has been around for nearly 15 years, and year after year they release a new instalment that sells solely based on hype. I was idiotic enough to buy into the hype because of my love for COD 2 and WAW, and now I obviously regret it.

    Basically, this COD was meant to be a nod to the games of old with a bs tagline of "Get your old squad back together". Well, I did, and while some think the game is passable and others would give this a zero, 4 is where I stand. I have played the series since Call of Duty 2 on Xbox 360 back in 05, and I believe I have just grown tired of the same formula, on top of the fact that this game is absolutely horrible. My review is more focused on the Multiplayer as it is the primary focus.

    Positives:

    - Campaign is great looking and very cinematic
    - WWII setting is nice to see again in both SP & MP
    - Headquarters setup for pre-game is a unique touch and offers some variety
    - Boots on the ground, no robots and jetpacks

    Negatives (Primarily in MP):

    - Cinematic campaigns do not equal fun
    - Nothing we have not seen before
    - Abysmal map design (3 main lanes, funnelled into the middle)
    - SMG focused CQB combat, not much variety for battles
    - No bolt action rifles without a scope? In a WWII based game? Is this a joke? (For Multiplayer)
    - Micro-transaction push with useless loot crates (near ubiquitous these days)
    - Forget about team focused gameplay (war mode is not as good as promised)
    - Spawning and spawn zones don't flip as much as they should, too easy to trap or be trapped
    - Forced perk system (divisions), does not allow you to mix and match perks to your liking as easily as previous entries

    Not even gonna bother commenting on nazi zombies since it really does not change much and is usually pretty consistent in its ability to create chaotic fun and endless nights with friends. I am sure it does its job properly as its standalone mode, which I would technically deem a positive.

    This game feels way too much like a re-skin, and less like a new and innovative AAA product (Yes, I know I should never expect COD and innovation to be mentioned in the same sentence nowadays). Alongside this, I have to mention that the servers for this game have been terrible as well, I did not want to mention it in the negatives as I am sure that it will be corrected soon.

    Also, for the love of gaming, I do not know why Swastikas have to be removed from a game that is being released outside of Germany? It was part of WWII, gaming is not a place for sensitive SJWs to modify every aspect to their liking. The soldier configurations and officers fall in this category as well. A black woman on the front lines for the reich? Stop. Historical accuracy is important for these types of games IMO, and as great looking as the campaign may be, why are german soldiers wielding PPSH (Russian) sub machine guns in D-Day bunkers? The social justice aspect has become so intrusive in video games that its sad. I do not care who it offends, this has to be part of the review. If you want a fake and dishonest review about these games, go watch your favourite YouTuber or check your favourite game review site who both get paid to say good things about the product. AAA products are dying in the quality department with things like this and micro-transactions and nobody says or does anything about it.

    Overall, you just cannot find enough positive things in this game to truly override the negatives, and for that reason, I end up giving this game a 4 or 40%, because while it is nice to see a return to boots on the ground and a WWII setting, the abysmal map design, exceptionally poor balancing, toxic community, lack of weaponry, and bad game mechanics just make this game a disaster that is relying on hype for a return to the old style of COD many of us miss. Take a pass on this one, those days are long gone.    … Expand
  21. PowerGamer
    Nov 9, 2017
    4
    Quite simply if the bugs don't kill you than the script kiddie hack buyers will.
    Game crashes a lot, has lame bugs like having to reset your weapons every round, etc., and still not fixed a week later.
    Then apparently bored of the game, the hacks started showing up in full force a week after launch. You watch the kill cam and they obviously see where you are, do constant head shots and    Quite simply if the bugs don't kill you than the script kiddie hack buyers will.
    Game crashes a lot, has lame bugs like having to reset your weapons every round, etc., and still not fixed a week later.
    Then apparently bored of the game, the hacks started showing up in full force a week after launch.
    You watch the kill cam and they obviously see where you are, do constant head shots and have 15 kills and 0 deaths.
    And how is it a level 4 mastered the game with out even leveling yet. But I'm sure if you look tomorrow they'll be easily level 50 at their hack rates.
    Where is the anti-cheat?

    Finally the solo mission is nothing special. Pretty boring. Adds nothing new.

    I should have known to wait awhile for reviews first..    … Expand
  22. wonderwu
    Nov 12, 2017
    0
    This is by far the worst game to ever be released under the "Call of Duty" franchise. The actual gameplay itself is not terrible, but all of the bugs, glitches, and errors make it horrendous. They had a beta for this game, but clearly didn't try to use the information gathered from it to better the game, because it has most of the exact same problems. At launch, no one in America couldThis is by far the worst game to ever be released under the "Call of Duty" franchise. The actual gameplay itself is not terrible, but all of the bugs, glitches, and errors make it horrendous. They had a beta for this game, but clearly didn't try to use the information gathered from it to better the game, because it has most of the exact same problems. At launch, no one in America could play for the first 2 hours. Now a week later, they've released their first "patch" for the game, and screwed that up as well. Now the game has major lag and hit detection problems. I have spent most of my day trying to complete a special order, of winning one of each game type in multiplayer, but it has not gone well. Every single time I win a game of Capture the Flag, it kicks me out and doesn't award me with any EXP or the win towards the order. Though, if I lose the game, it will count. Sledgehammer Games should be ashamed to release this slop, and Activision should be embarrassed to release this under their moniker. I, for one, will never be purchasing another Call of Duty game if they can't even keep their own standards high.… Expand
  23. Lochie
    Nov 4, 2017
    1
    As an Australian it is now 57 hours since I purchased this game. I can't play online at all with a fibre connection. I will not praise a single player campaign of 5 hours, that standard should've never become acceptable. I have stayed away from CoD for a while, returning with high hopes. I'll try and get a refund today.
  24. Chiefaholic9
    Nov 4, 2017
    0
    Multiplayer server issues galore. Headquarters menu system is a bust. Supply drops don't work. End of match glitches that make the game freeze and force you to restart. And that's if you're lucky enough to be able to connect to Xbox live at all. Poor launch.
  25. Fragnum24
    Nov 6, 2017
    1
    You can tell they tried, but this has to be the final nail in this coffin? I really tried to enjoy it but the whole game seems flacid and devoid of anything that embraces you as a gamer.
    I gave my copy to my 10 year old cousin and he absolutely hates it too.
    TL;DR - bought once, already had two owners, both owners wanted it out of the house asap.
  26. dchoover1987
    Nov 12, 2017
    1
    The game is a joke. It is HORRIBLY unbalanced. It's just like how Infinity Ward made MW2, the best CoD to date, but they also made Infinite Warfare.....the worst CoD to date, and one of the worst FPS ever made. Same company....two completely different game balance and performace presentations. Sledgehammer is the same thing. They made Advanced Warfare....one of my 3 favorite CoD (the otherThe game is a joke. It is HORRIBLY unbalanced. It's just like how Infinity Ward made MW2, the best CoD to date, but they also made Infinite Warfare.....the worst CoD to date, and one of the worst FPS ever made. Same company....two completely different game balance and performace presentations. Sledgehammer is the same thing. They made Advanced Warfare....one of my 3 favorite CoD (the other two MW2 and BLOPS3)....then they made this travesty of a game. It's as bad as Ghosts and IW.

    I sat behind someone in a Dom match....not 8 feet from them, with the Type 100....emptied the ENTIRE CLIP into them, 8 feet......8.....feet, and got 2 hit markers. 2.....2 hit markers.

    This game needs to be fixed asap. The PVP is just unbalanced. There is no other work for it. This game sucks in its current build. Please fix it. Please.....I want this game to be good so bad. My K/D is a 0.78 and it is 100% from how bad this game performs.

    And dont even gir me stsrted on the terrible spawn points. COD has had bad spawn poij issues for years....but this takes the cake. I've watched enemies appear dead in front of me out of thin air and kill me. (They dont appear on the ground, they fall from about 7 feet up and shoot you). Real hard to shoot people who appear right in front of you unkess you have suoer human reflexes.

    The only reason this is getting such a high score is because Activision PAID for the good reviews. Notice the majority of actual user reviews are negative but the review site reviews are positive? Yeah.....goes to show you how unreliable paid reviewers are. Don't listen to that stuff......this game is a 1, at best...and thats just because I like the timeline and the guns...    … Expand
  27. mechroblaster
    Nov 7, 2017
    8
    This is the first CoD game I've purchased in years and I'm happy with the purchase.

    Pros: Really enjoying the WWII campaign and story. The MP is a lot of fun with a variety of modes. War mode is especially fun. The graphics, sound and feel of the game are of great quality. Cons: With only 9 MP maps and 3 War mode maps it leaves a lot to be desired with map variety for a base    This is the first CoD game I've purchased in years and I'm happy with the purchase.

    Pros:

    Really enjoying the WWII campaign and story. The MP is a lot of fun with a variety of modes. War mode is especially fun. The graphics, sound and feel of the game are of great quality.

    Cons:

    With only 9 MP maps and 3 War mode maps it leaves a lot to be desired with map variety for a base game. Would have been better to have 14 or so maps for MP and 6 or so for War mode. Never been a huge Zombies fan of any of the CoDs so I can't comment on that since it wouldn't be specific to this game.

    Overall Impression:

    Solid, super fun game. If you like boots-on-the-ground CoD then this game is a pleasant return to CoDs roots. The MP is really fun and enjoyable. Divisions is a welcome addition creating additional variety. Overall really well pleased with this imperfect game. Hopefully they continue to make QoL improvements throughout its lifespan.    … Expand
  28. Juder007
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Putting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sightPutting aside that multiplayer doesn't even work. Tried many times. Game has many many problems. I gave it 2/10, because the cinematic is pretty cool. Gameplay is **** in campaign. 80% of the time you can barely see the enemy you're killing(so what's the point?). The other 20% they run up and kill you without you seeing them. One shot. The entire game you're squinting down an iron sight killing enemies you can barely see. It's like the most beautiful cinematic piece of **** phone app game. I don't know about multiplayer because I can't join. But judging from campaign, it's **** I've yet to see a good Activision game, personally, not sure how they keep getting contracts to create games. Sledgehammer, what, has a b or c rated xbox original game that hardly anyone plays? The gameplay is **** the story is way oversold by the company and it's bought for critics. They make it out to be like some Private Ryan movie, not even close. It's just another video game story with some cool cinematic scenes in between garbage gameplay. This was the first game I ever pre-bought, and the last. I'm a big call of duty fan, missed the last couple, all advanced stuff, but **** off. This is not some groundbreaking new stuff they claimed it to be. It's the same old garbage.… Expand
  29. Riandaniar
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
  30. WillgocostaBR
    Nov 6, 2017
    0
    The worst game of COD franchises ever.
    Nothing does work well. The soldier class builder is horroble.
    I do not know what they did, the IW was great, they could use a similar mechanic. Poor game, with the exception of graphics, everything else sucks.
  31. BradDavide
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    Disclaimer- I'm a 35 year old full time employed, Father, Husband and college student, I buy these COD games knowing quite well that a large population of the online community plays for 20+ hours a week. Now-a-days if I buy a shooter it's mostly for the Campaign play.

    I would say this is the best COD campaign to date, but unfortunately that's a rather low bar set by a series who    Disclaimer- I'm a 35 year old full time employed, Father, Husband and college student, I buy these COD games knowing quite well that a large population of the online community plays for 20+ hours a week. Now-a-days if I buy a shooter it's mostly for the Campaign play.

    I would say this is the best COD campaign to date, but unfortunately that's a rather low bar set by a series who clearly focuses on the multiplayer aspect. I had fun with the story which took me around 9 hours to play through on regular difficulty. I'm a little surprised to see that such a huge franchise not only fails to push the envelope on graphics/emersion/sound, but doesn't even seem to meet the expectations set by games like Battlefield 1 and Ghost Recon Wild Lands. Granted BF1 may have been ahead of it's time, but it's also a year old, so my biggest gripe with WW2 is the unmistakably inferior gameplay. Most notably, the first person movement, it still glides along way too fast and sporadic very unlike true POV movement should be. Cut scenes where normally a game gets to flex it's graphic muscles, still lack. There is definite mismatching of mouth/words, choppy movement and "game" feel. But it's a review and I'm mostly pointing out the flaws, I did enjoy it and don't regret $60 purchase.

    Multiplayer- Come one guys, there must be SOMETHING you can do to fix this. Unless you are a habitual COD or other FPS multiplayer gamer, the multiplayer is simply no fun, and actually quite irritating. I don't blame the kids who are scoring 30-2 in team deathmatch, I DO blame the creators for not correcting the problem. There are definitely ways to create lobby's either manual or auto where players can play with similar K:D ranges as themselves. I don't want an "I suck" lobby, I don't mind scoring low, I just want to play and have some fun after $60 and only a 9 hour campaign. I've logged about 3 hours of online play at the time of this review, and in team deathmatch/domination play I'm averaging about a 5:20. Simply no fun and pisses off the rest of the team. If I could rate the story and multiplayer separate I'd say 7 and 1. Even the war mode, which is nice they don't show my huge amount of deaths, the gameplay isn't much more fun since I'm still being shot in the face every 6 steps.
    I'm not sure what was different, but while BF1's campaign was a better single player experience, they also seemed to write a multiplayer experience that was accommodating for the "Dad" players like me. I think after a few days I was close to a 1:2 average and 1:1 on good days, not a selfish goal for online play. It probably has to do with the COD players adapting to really what is only new maps/guns per release, and right back to praying on guys like me haha.

    Thanks for reading, please check out my profile for other "Dad" reviews.    … Expand
  32. Benjiib
    Nov 21, 2017
    2
    Game is outdated and its only just been released, feel like the engine used is from COD 2 just smoother.. campaign sucks balls (just one square map to the next square map while shooting people in between) the multiplayer is an unbalanced pack of **** and suffers from lag i have never had lag issues this bad since my Xbox 360 Virtua Tennis Days.
    im sure companies get paid to rate    Game is outdated and its only just been released, feel like the engine used is from COD 2 just smoother.. campaign sucks balls (just one square map to the next square map while shooting people in between) the multiplayer is an unbalanced pack of **** and suffers from lag i have never had lag issues this bad since my Xbox 360 Virtua Tennis Days.
    im sure companies get paid to rate positively about these ****ty pre-packaged yearly releases.
    not a fan of Battlefield 1 but even now that is far superior in every aspect from Graphics to world design and variety on gameplay    … Expand
  33. Cyrodin
    Jan 1, 2018
    9
    Another awesome COD game. Nice Campaign, good visuals and a extremely fun multiplayer. Even the Zombies mode is great and quite scary sometimes. I think that Sledgehammer Games did a fantastic job. It even has a pretty fair microtransactions system. This game isn´t perfect, but it´s far from being horrible. Sure, the older games were a bit more better, but i think a casual or a competitiveAnother awesome COD game. Nice Campaign, good visuals and a extremely fun multiplayer. Even the Zombies mode is great and quite scary sometimes. I think that Sledgehammer Games did a fantastic job. It even has a pretty fair microtransactions system. This game isn´t perfect, but it´s far from being horrible. Sure, the older games were a bit more better, but i think a casual or a competitive player can have a good time on this.… Expand
  34. IMPACT_XO
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    I joined here only in order to put the rating 1/10... Very bad. Activision has learned nothing. Best textures as always.
    I have no words how bad this game is
    Best regards, IMPACT.
  35. iamevilhomer
    Nov 5, 2017
    0
    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol. Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough    Please take this review seriously as it's for the good of gaming...

    Call of duty world war 2? More like Call of duty wont work 2 lololol.

    Know that I haven't played the game myself but also know that I'm not a idiot when it comes to quality FPS games and guess what? This game sucks. You play one of these crappy cod games and you have pretty much played them all... I have done enough research and have seen that the game is as I had expected. Trash... But hey... We smart people all saw this coming. We knew it was going to suck lol. Just another terrible cod game with the WW2 paint coat put on.

    Short 6 hour campaign that's not very historically accurate as advertised. Also has dumb AI and glitches on top of stuttering issues many have been reporting.

    Game also has micro transactions which automatically knocks the game down several points.

    Lobbies and load times are totally garbage in this game. Dead zone issues with aiming have been reported multiple times.

    Trash maps that are very few with many guns missing that I'm sure will be released over time through dlc/micro transaction horse **** and butt ****ery...

    Here's the funniest thing of all... Apparently the ps4 version is working better than the xbox one version. The xbox one version was unplayable for the first few days of launch for most xbox one folk... At least the online multiplayer part. So why is the ps4 version getting a slightly lower metacritic critic score by the critics???? Lol whatever... Maybe it's got something to do with that over priced and pretty much useless for gamers console known as the xbox one x? Who knows who cares...

    There are other problems but I don't care to remember them right now. I'm just caring enough to do this review for laughs and for the good of gaming. DON'T buy jokes of a game like this one. They exist to rob you blind and leave you with nothing but frustration. You people should honestly know this by now. I mean for ****s sake... It's cod... It's crap division... It's supposed to suck lol.

    Decent visuals though... Lets not let this review be all negativity... Gotta give credit where it's due I suppose... Just to be fair and nice : )

    Even without many of the problems I listed though... It's still just trashy cod at the end of the day so I would still give it a low score lolz.

    I have never actually given a game a 0 before. I gave the ps4 version a 1 since it at least runs decently on the ps4. But since pretty much absolutely nothing works on the xbox one version... I'm going to have to give this a 0. I'm sorry but decent visuals in this case being the only decent thing about the game isn't enough to give this trash even 1 point. The game being a broken unfinished mess on top of being a corporate cash cow micro transaction game designed to screw you over means I'm not giving it any credit. It's not even a game to me. It's just a scam at the end of the day. You all know it's true. Those of you who actually have a brain that is...    … Expand
  36. kyaz
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    This is call of duty, where they take your money and deliver a piss poor game.

    I've spent more time on loading screens than playing the game. It takes 5 minutes to connect to a base of ops. fine. join a game, the scoreboard at the end is broken 90% of the time so you cant leave or vote for another map. then when you finally are able to quit at the end of the timer, it takes another 5    This is call of duty, where they take your money and deliver a piss poor game.

    I've spent more time on loading screens than playing the game. It takes 5 minutes to connect to a base of ops. fine. join a game, the scoreboard at the end is broken 90% of the time so you cant leave or vote for another map. then when you finally are able to quit at the end of the timer, it takes another 5 minutes to join a base of ops again. Thats if you don't timeout, btw.

    AND THIS IS AFTER THEY "FIXED" IT AFTER THE FUMBLED LAUNCH.

    gave it a 1/10 because it has a campaign, but tbh it doesn't matter how the campaign is, its overshadowed by the fact that they have no idea what they are doing when it comes to multiplayer or social space or anything regarding a network. at all. if they can't fix it in the next day or so, its not even worth it to me. i'll be returning it without hesitation.    … Expand
  37. Xalon
    Nov 7, 2017
    1
    They screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game aThey screwed up the launch. That's unacceptable in the modern era, where this should be easily anticipated as these launches happen with regularity. Also, the game is horribly inaccurate. The guns are wrong and used by the wrong groups at the wrong times. There's heavy censorship. The characters are unlikable. The mechanics are annoying. WTF was I thinking giving another COD game a chance? Pass on this at all costs.… Expand
  38. Nathan-D
    Nov 3, 2017
    0
    So the first two written "reviews" by voodoo_911 and bdelpesco below giving this game 10 and 9 respectively are suspiciously brief and likely fake. This is the first COD game I've bought in years and it's such a tragic disappointment. The main issues with the game for me are the Divisions classes, the unresponsive controls and the maps. The Division classes essentially force you to playSo the first two written "reviews" by voodoo_911 and bdelpesco below giving this game 10 and 9 respectively are suspiciously brief and likely fake. This is the first COD game I've bought in years and it's such a tragic disappointment. The main issues with the game for me are the Divisions classes, the unresponsive controls and the maps. The Division classes essentially force you to play certain ways. So instead of picking perks to best suit your play-style you choose divisions. It's needlessly restrictive and feels as though this is just another way that the developers are trying to "even out" the competition, as so to give newcomers a better chance. The maps are designed in a way whereby if you're playing S&D it's hard to flank and you'll usually just run into people head-glitching on something. There is nothing "dynamic" about this game. It's unresponsive, the map design feels lazy and the visuals are poor compared to other current-gen games. It's one of those rare instances where the game is so rubbish that I can't even be bothered to give it a longer, more in-depth review. Waste of money… Expand
  39. rusyn
    Nov 3, 2017
    1
    Good polish and pretty game, but the gameplay is nothing new, if even a few steps backwards for shooters. Also, Activision's grip is VERY apparent: In my two hours of multiplayer time, I swear I saw at least 15 microtransaction pushes. Greedy and hollow.
  40. riverkev95
    Nov 3, 2017
    3
    Una correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente queUna correcta decisión regresar al multiplayer clásico y a una historia mas acorde a la saga tras el gran fiasco de COD: Infinite Warfare, por lo cual en ese apartado mejora bastante, aunque cabe resaltar que la historia pudo haberse aprovechado de mejor manera siendo "la segunda guerra mundial" y el multiplayer corre muy bien pero el desbalance que genera el matchmaking entre gente que paga por mejores armas con la gente que juega sin pagar mas por el videojuego es terrible.
    A pesar de sus puntos positivos anteriormente descritos, lo que mas choca en este juego es el hecho de que se hayan implementado todas las políticas mas nefastas que existen actualmente en el mundo de los videojuegos, aprovechandose así de su inmensa base de usuarios fieles a la saga.
    Entre estas políticas nefastas puedo mencionar que el juego viene recortado de lanzamiento (Prueba de esto es el DLC ya anunciado para enero de 2018), las lootboxes que están tan de moda en casi todos los videojuegos pero en este juego son implementadas de una forma mas descarada ya que tú puedes ver como los otros jugadores reciben sus premios tras comprar una cajita de estas, esto va acorde al matchmaking que relacione jugadores que no han gastado dinero extra en el videojuego con personas que gastan un montón y por lo tanto consiguen mejores armas en tu cara, lo cual provoca un online totalmente desbalanceado, por no decir que roto.
    En conclusión, este juego mejora algunos aspectos del juego del año anterior, pero la forma tan descarada en que Activision gana dinero de sus usuarios en este juego no me deja ponerle una mejor nota que "3".    … Expand
  41. Tenacidad963
    Nov 7, 2017
    0
    Este Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero seEste Call Of Duty es una burla a la inteligencia, puede tener en algunas partes buenos gráficos y pocos momentos buenos que contentan a los que no piden mucho a un juego. Sin embargo, malogran un hecho histórico muy importante al ponerle cajas de micropagos. Eliminan un momento que debería ser épico por ponerle en la cara al jugador su mala praxis de vender ítems que te ayudan, pero se pierde el aspecto de inmersión. A pesar de tener gráficos actuales se ve como si fuera para niños. Entonces te das cuenta de que te subestiman como jugador, independientemente de que si ya has jugado a otros Call Of Duty´s. La campaña dura poco de entre 5 o 6 horas, el multijugador parece que le han puesto mucho entusiasmo parece que creen que el jugador es conformista y fácil de manejar.

    In English
    This Call Of Duty is a mockery to the intelligence, it can have in some parts good graphics and few good moments that please those who do not ask much for a game. However, they spoil a very important historical fact by putting boxes of micropayments. Eliminate a moment that should be epic for putting in the face of the player his bad practice of selling items that help you, but you lose the immersive aspect. Despite having current graphics it looks as if it were for children. Then you realize that they underestimate you as a player, regardless of whether you have already played other Call Of Duty's. The campaign lasts little between 5 or 6 hours, the multiplayer seems to have put a lot of enthusiasm seems to believe that the player is conformist and easy to handle.    … Expand
  42. Warhawk-1999
    Nov 8, 2017
    9
    I have not had any problems with this game so far i think that ww2 is a great game and it is a great tribute to the old games like cod waw. The zombies has brought back the fear factor is zombies. the ee for the maps are to easy there sapost to be achievements not a easy step by step tutorial. When i do the eastereggs i want to feel accomplished that i was one of the top .9% ect toI have not had any problems with this game so far i think that ww2 is a great game and it is a great tribute to the old games like cod waw. The zombies has brought back the fear factor is zombies. the ee for the maps are to easy there sapost to be achievements not a easy step by step tutorial. When i do the eastereggs i want to feel accomplished that i was one of the top .9% ect to complete the map not already hav 10% of all players complete the map because there so easy… Expand
  43. Tigerstripe612
    Nov 6, 2017
    8
    This COD is actually pretty good! Passed on Infinite Warfare because I was sick of the futuristic CODs; however, decided to give WWII a go since WAW was one of my favorite CODs of all time. Also, I think Advanced Warfare was a great game since it wasn't completely over the top with the futuristic crap and it brought fun/innovation to the COD series, hence giving Sledgehammer Games myThis COD is actually pretty good! Passed on Infinite Warfare because I was sick of the futuristic CODs; however, decided to give WWII a go since WAW was one of my favorite CODs of all time. Also, I think Advanced Warfare was a great game since it wasn't completely over the top with the futuristic crap and it brought fun/innovation to the COD series, hence giving Sledgehammer Games my support again. Kinda disappointed with only getting 9 multiplayer maps when older CODs would give us 14 or so at launch. Weapons are cool and sound great. The new War mode is fun and engaging; I always wondered what it would be like to be a German soldier mowing down the Americans from the machine gun bunker on the beaches of Normandy (you get to do this in one of the War mode sections). There's a new social space like Destiny's tower which allows you team up with others, tryout score streaks, do weapon paint jobs, and pick up challenges that help with level progression and allow you to acquire special weapons/gear. Lastly, it's great to have boots on the ground again!

    The graphics are good for what the outdated engine will allow but the developers need to design a new COD engine if they want to keep up with Destiny and Battlefield visuals. Sledgehammer Games did a great job again and delivered a fine product. It's not perfect by no means but there's not too much to complain about. If they would've used an updated engine and delivered more maps, most of us COD fans would be more than happy. Lastly, it's great to have boots on the ground again!    … Expand
  44. KittyWhisky
    Nov 4, 2017
    8
    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The    I couldn't put less points, but wanted. This game has amazing graphics, gameplay is a step back. But Sledgehammer Games was able to show a real war. It showed the war without embellishment, real, brutal war. We have forgotten what it is. We used fun to kill enemies in video games without hesitation. After CALL OF DUTY: WWII start to appreciate the peaceful times in which we live.

    The story tells the usual story of a military soldier. Together with brothers in arms wades through a real hell. We've seen similar stories in games, the war has not been shown so realistically. Basically, this effect causes dismemberment. Very often we will see people without body parts, burning people and the atrocities of the Nazis.

    The plot is simple, but you believe in this war, believe what is happening on the screen. All the characters have their own character, everyone has their demons. It is interesting to observe the drama of the characters.

    The gameplay is now in spirit first every part OF CALL OF DUTY. Because of this the gameplay has become more boring. You sit behind cover and aims at enemies. Diversity is not. But there is one good innovation. The developers decided to implement in a single company element of teamwork. If we need supplies, first aid kit or swegene about the enemy - we are asking comrades. This is an interesting thing. and Yes, now health itself is not restored - it is necessary to look for kits. Here you don't feel like a super soldier ready to kill everyone, you could die at any moment.

    Call of Duty: WWII is a game about realistic warfare. A single company is not very long, but no time to get bored. It's not the best Call of Duty, gameplay and artistic design can to lose IW, but nevertheless it was nice to return to the battlefields of WWII.    … Expand
  45. APMerry
    Nov 8, 2017
    9
    My first cod since black ops 2 and I'm really enjoying it. It's the same multiplayer as before, fast paced and fun. The campaign is entertaining, but a bit too "American" if you know what I mean. Most reviews seem to be hating on this game because that the "cool" thing to do isn't it with COD. They really messed up the launch, but you can't base a review on 1 weekend where the servers wereMy first cod since black ops 2 and I'm really enjoying it. It's the same multiplayer as before, fast paced and fun. The campaign is entertaining, but a bit too "American" if you know what I mean. Most reviews seem to be hating on this game because that the "cool" thing to do isn't it with COD. They really messed up the launch, but you can't base a review on 1 weekend where the servers were down. I really like the HQ section and working towards the orders objectives and redeeming collections keeps you grinding up the ranks. There's nothing in the loot crates that give's the player an advantage (at the time of this review) and I hope it stays that way. Cosmetic items are fun and I enjoy the customisation. The divisions are pretty much the same as create a class from the old games, it's just been renamed.

    Overall i think it's a solid game that will have my attention into the new year. The move back to WW2 was a welcome one.    … Expand
  46. Plush
    Nov 6, 2017
    9
    I was almost scared away by all the outrageously negative user reviews, but I was lured by the prospect of WW2 returning to the glory days of MW2 & MW3 that I loved so much. Glad I went for it! The multiplayer simply feels like an updated 2017 version of "boots on the ground" MW2.

    The negative reviews show that the game isn't for everyone, though. What I'm about to say will squarely    I was almost scared away by all the outrageously negative user reviews, but I was lured by the prospect of WW2 returning to the glory days of MW2 & MW3 that I loved so much. Glad I went for it! The multiplayer simply feels like an updated 2017 version of "boots on the ground" MW2.

    The negative reviews show that the game isn't for everyone, though. What I'm about to say will squarely mark me as the classic CoD d-bag player stereotype, but all these players' way over-the-top level of freaking out almost makes me wonder if they're just mad because they can't handle getting killed. You can't walk in and pwn people from the first moment and have success from the beginning like it's Candy Crush or something. Sheesh.

    Everyone overrates themselves and their skill level with these games. Maybe you just suck. I have no other explanation for such a visceral reaction and all the 0/10 scores. It's silly. You have to be fast on the trigger to beat people, and when you're not, you get to watch kill cams all day... and then you go cry to the internet that the game is broken. It's not broken, and I'm looking forward to shooting you up till you call me a "hacker" and rage quit. REEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!    … Expand
  47. Maverickneo
    Nov 5, 2017
    8
    There will alway sbe hate for COD games. While the online still has some fixing to do, (Lag and launch problems) I really like how its back to boots on the ground and based on gunplay. It has the WW2 look and feel while also adding some modern moments to it. If you are tired of all the fast paced jump packs and flying, this turns it down a notch. I finally feel like Im playing classicThere will alway sbe hate for COD games. While the online still has some fixing to do, (Lag and launch problems) I really like how its back to boots on the ground and based on gunplay. It has the WW2 look and feel while also adding some modern moments to it. If you are tired of all the fast paced jump packs and flying, this turns it down a notch. I finally feel like Im playing classic COD again. The campaign is a bit weird to follow at first but from halfway to the end it comes together really well. We finally get to experience the WW2 campaign on next gen systems. I dont think this game is bad at all. Im loving it. Dont let the hater reviews fool you check it out for yourself.… Expand
  48. dlwatso15
    Nov 3, 2017
    10
    Absolutely amazing. What everyone has been waiting for. Do not listen to the reviews from the kids who can't afford the game and so they hate on it. It's a 10 out of 10.
  49. bdelpesco
    Nov 3, 2017
    9
    I don't know where all this hate is coming from. The graphics are awesome. The multiplayer is dynamic. I promised myself I'd only play for 2 hours and ended up forcing myself to quit after 3.5
  50. hjsimp5
    Nov 5, 2017
    9
    Finally a decent Call of Duty. The last few years the multiplayer has just been rubbish. This one feels fresh but familiar. Boots on the ground! No more getting shot in the back by some idiot jetpacking over you before you even realise there is someone there.

    The single player campaign is amazing. Something about doing the beach landings at Normandy sends a chill down my spine    Finally a decent Call of Duty. The last few years the multiplayer has just been rubbish. This one feels fresh but familiar. Boots on the ground! No more getting shot in the back by some idiot jetpacking over you before you even realise there is someone there.

    The single player campaign is amazing. Something about doing the beach landings at Normandy sends a chill down my spine every time. Nazi Zombies is decent, but I have to admit that I still miss Extinction.

    Very impressive visually, and the controls and gameplay just feel nice and smooth. Welcome back COD!    … Expand
  51. SchroederRock
    Nov 5, 2017
    6
    Outside of an OK campaign and strong Nazi Zombies game mode, there's not much to love with WWII. For $60, that will make CoD WWII another letdown for CoD, which has again churned out a somewhat boring yearly release. No timeline change can mask the problems with the gameplay design and the lack of imagination. Only a significant drop in sales will signal to Activision to kill off thisOutside of an OK campaign and strong Nazi Zombies game mode, there's not much to love with WWII. For $60, that will make CoD WWII another letdown for CoD, which has again churned out a somewhat boring yearly release. No timeline change can mask the problems with the gameplay design and the lack of imagination. Only a significant drop in sales will signal to Activision to kill off this series and let the studios do their own thing. If you haven't been happy with CoD for years, you're not going to like this much at all. My advice: rent the game for a couple days and play the campaign. If you love Nazi Zombies, that's about the only high replay value you can find from this otherwise-limited shooter. If you love the era, what are you doing buying this game? Battlefield 1, though more complex and less rookie-friendly at times, is a MUCH better display into this era of history and should be favored over WWII. Side note: this game looks pretty lame in multiplayer - Call of Duty has finally shown its age as its game engine has lacked convincing detail on consoles. Some may find it appealing but I'd have to contest their gameplay catalog as several other AAA titles do a significantly better job of showing something beautiful on-screen.… Expand
  52. CygnusX1Bk2
    Nov 13, 2017
    6
    Was looking forward to this but it’s a little disappointing. The campaign is a bit thin and was hoping for more. 11 chapters is about half of what I expected. Multiplayer took multiple tries and restarts to even get to the menus. The original score is good and the player guns sound great but the rest of the sound is lack luster. I’ve never been crazy about a first person on consoles andWas looking forward to this but it’s a little disappointing. The campaign is a bit thin and was hoping for more. 11 chapters is about half of what I expected. Multiplayer took multiple tries and restarts to even get to the menus. The original score is good and the player guns sound great but the rest of the sound is lack luster. I’ve never been crazy about a first person on consoles and this doesn’t help. It wasn’t horrible but also not great. Wish there were more meat.… Expand
  53. Pherball66
    Dec 8, 2017
    8
    Single player is great and looks amazing on the one x. Thank you devs for including the offline multiplayer, that is much appreciated. Multiplayer is well...COD multiplayer run and gun although the sniper rifles seem to be just point in the general direction and pull the trigger and you get a kill. I like the days when you had to be prone to use the sniper with any accuracy but I guessSingle player is great and looks amazing on the one x. Thank you devs for including the offline multiplayer, that is much appreciated. Multiplayer is well...COD multiplayer run and gun although the sniper rifles seem to be just point in the general direction and pull the trigger and you get a kill. I like the days when you had to be prone to use the sniper with any accuracy but I guess those days are gone. :( Overall this game is awesome, buy it just for the single player, it is THAT good.… Expand
  54. SmittShow
    Nov 16, 2017
    6
    So the campaign is really good, I wish it was longer because I wasnt bored for a second playing it. The characters and story are historically accurate for the most part*, interesting and very detailed. The only thing I was really disappointed about was the game seemed to avoid anything to do with Nazi's or death camps*. While I understand the lack of this content I feel like they shouldSo the campaign is really good, I wish it was longer because I wasnt bored for a second playing it. The characters and story are historically accurate for the most part*, interesting and very detailed. The only thing I was really disappointed about was the game seemed to avoid anything to do with Nazi's or death camps*. While I understand the lack of this content I feel like they should have made an edit for the countries where this was not permissible. Unfortunately for the first three days after purchasing this game I was unable to play the game online at all due to server problems. This was my first clue of many that the game, while playable in its current state, could have used several more months of fine-tuning. Before I dive back into the problems I want to talk about another positive of the game which was the zombie game mode. While the map is rather small compared to many recent zombie maps it is a rather fun experience. There are many hidden easter eggs to discover including the main one being summoning the zombie boss which required team-work and coordination between your online party. I am continually dissapointed every time a new call of duty is released with zombies and it doesnt include a search paramater option. I am sick of backing out of groups a hundred times over again trying to find three other people with microphones. Searching for people close to your level and with a mic would make the game mode a million times better. As you level up in zombies you unlock new weapon attachments, loot boxes with skins or one time use consumables, and raven tokens which are used to as a class system to include minor perk upgrades. The only problem is aside from the hold three gun perk that you start with most of these perks that you can unlock are relatively useless. Now to dive into arguably the worst and most unpolished part of the game, the online multiplayer. Aside from connection problems that seem to be plaguing most of the gaming population right now it doesnt take long playing and leveling up in multiplayer to notice how unfinished this part of the game is. I wont go into detail but if you really want to read the long, laundry list of problems you can find it on the ww2 reddit page. I will however mention a few of the problems quickly. The main one being the longer load times after and before you get into games due to the hq having to constantly reload, which is rather pointless because in its current state no other players load into the hq which at one time was meant to be a shared hq between people to marvel at what other people were getting in their loot boxes. This leads me to my next point which is how poorly thought our this games entire loot system is. Lets talk about the fact that they have seemingly hundreds of different pistol grips which is entirely pointless because you cant even see the pistol grips in game, and when you have camo on the pistol it completely covers them up. Also the multiplayer mechanics are grossly misbalanced with people able to quick scope with no need to aim, people drop-shotting way too fast (going prone needs to be slowed alot), terrible gun balance with only a few guns being viable competitively. The multiplayer is by far the worst part of this game and you can tell they ran out of time and shoved it out the door before they should have. As it is now I would recommend this game as a rental and if they add some polish and the game drops in price it could very well be worth a buy in the future. People, however, need to stop supporting these game companies releasing. unfinished products… Expand
  55. ultraviper
    Nov 22, 2017
    5
    The campaign is decent. The multiplayer isn't. TTK is too low. You die in 1-2 hits from anything. There's no counterplay because as soon as you notice someone shooting at you, you're already dead. Because killing is so fast, the slow-firing, inaccurate guns you start with are worthless and the good guns are locked behind hours and hours of progression. which isn't fun if you're playingThe campaign is decent. The multiplayer isn't. TTK is too low. You die in 1-2 hits from anything. There's no counterplay because as soon as you notice someone shooting at you, you're already dead. Because killing is so fast, the slow-firing, inaccurate guns you start with are worthless and the good guns are locked behind hours and hours of progression. which isn't fun if you're playing against everyone that HAS the good guns already. Oh yeah, and the sniper rifles have a new built-in auto aim feature for some reason.… Expand
  56. gamenerd64x
    Nov 11, 2017
    7
    Call of duty WWII is the blandest title in the series to date. While the game is competently made (apart of the horrendous server issues and some absolutely terrible maps) it just feels like a mash of other cod games without standing on it's own.

    The multiplayer hasn't changed much. Apart from headquarters and the war mode, there is nothing here that's hasn't been done in previous cods    Call of duty WWII is the blandest title in the series to date. While the game is competently made (apart of the horrendous server issues and some absolutely terrible maps) it just feels like a mash of other cod games without standing on it's own.

    The multiplayer hasn't changed much. Apart from headquarters and the war mode, there is nothing here that's hasn't been done in previous cods and it in fact loses some modes like ground war and gun game. everything that the game does well, feels like something black ops 2 did before it and better like the camo challenges (which were way to hard in AW), the emblem editor and the general fast pace of the gameplay.
    the new divisions are basically just a load of perks divided into groups while having one separate called basic training. technically you can have 5 perks at once, but not mix them and you can't switch them out with attachments or grenades which really limits the creativity found in the "pick 10" system
    The maps themselves are mostly close quarters so shotguns are rampant. There are quite a few maps that aren't very good. USS Texas is one of the worst maps i've ever played in a cod game. It's almost as bad as stonehaven from ghosts. There are only 9 maps (not including the 3 war maps) where only around 3-4 of them are any good.

    As far as the campaign goes, it's the same story there. You get exactly what you expect, without anything really surprising happening. The only real difference is that it has gone back to the health pack system from the very first cod and its expansion. You can either find them around the levels or kill enough Nazis for your teammate to give you one. It doesn't really make that much of a difference since the game is fairly easy to get trough, even on veteran difficulty.
    It does have one or two missions that are pretty nice, like the stealth mission in France, but overall the eastern front setting already has been done to death in previous cod games or equivalent.

    As for the zombie mode... it's alright. It is way easier compared to the say the black ops 2 ZM. I am not the biggest zombies player out there, so i don't know how it stacks up with all the Easter egg things and what not, But for the casual zombie player, it's alright.

    WWII is by no means a bad game. Compared to some of the previous games like cod ghosts, it really is good. But ghosts actually tried something different, With the bigger maps and faster time to kill to make team-play more viable. It failed miserably but at least it tried. This game just feels like a less polished black ops 2 with worse maps and a different setting. If you haven't played a cod game in the last 4 years and just want a "boots on the ground" cod, and don't really care that it hasn't changed much then this is for you. For anyone burned out by the series by now, it probably won't change your opinion of it.    … Expand
  57. Jonathan117
    Nov 19, 2017
    5
    The good:
    - Fun, enjoyable and rather a historically focused story.
    - Nazi zombies is by far the most enjoyable aspect of the game.
    - New War mode is great, the only good maps if you ask me.
    The bad:
    - Awful multiplayer maps
    - Lousy scorestreaks
    - Bad weapon balancing
    - Some features not finished on launch (Paintjob for example). Rushed game.
  58. sgy0003
    Nov 5, 2017
    7
    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter bs

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are fun    Set in WWII, you think they would put more effort into the game since it's an actual part of the history and not some sci-fi future shooter bs

    Well, although the campaign is much better than the last three entries (BO3, AW, and IW). There are mix of tank section, aviation battle, espionage, and stealth. However, tank and aviation battle especially sucks, because even though they are fun it only lasts about 15-20 min as part of a mission, and NOT as a whole mission. Espionage while entertaining, it's easy enough for anyone with basic stealth instincts can plow through. And Stealth.....oh my god, it sucks. There is so much stealth in this game. You'd think that would be nice taking a break from full frontal combat, but these stealth sections are annoyingly paced. I was expecting a brother-in-arms type of bonding with my npc comrades, but that never happened.

    Multiplayer is also a lot better, but still kinda the same. We finally don't have jet-packs and futuristic abilities, so the gameplay is much more grounded (literally). It's still only fun when you are the one kicking asses, but you'll still be plagued with cheap shots, 6-year olds who apparently did your mother, and those who are better than you. Oh and lootboxes, while unnecessary, shows the greedy corperate bs side of Activision in a full force.

    If you are looking to get COD, WWII is the game I'd recommend(sorta). The game looks great, campaign has its moments, and multiplayer as always needs some serious balancing.    … Expand
  59. abscherz
    Nov 30, 2017
    8
    I haven't been on the CoD train in a few years. I hated all the jumping and boosting around.. it got a little too sci-fi for me. WWII isn't as authentic as WaW (which was my second favorite behind CoD4 MW), but it's still nice. Back to boots on the ground and it looks great. The new War mode is pretty cool and intense, especially the D-Day map.. in which you're literally able to playI haven't been on the CoD train in a few years. I hated all the jumping and boosting around.. it got a little too sci-fi for me. WWII isn't as authentic as WaW (which was my second favorite behind CoD4 MW), but it's still nice. Back to boots on the ground and it looks great. The new War mode is pretty cool and intense, especially the D-Day map.. in which you're literally able to play the opening scene of Saving Private Ryan. It's still an arcady/twitch shooter, but it's supposed to be. So no need to compare to Battlefield, as they are two completely separate types of gameplay. If you were a fan of the earlier CoDs, then I recommend this. 8/10… Expand
  60. B5HARP
    Dec 27, 2017
    3
    Game is garbage, i only gave it a 3 because once it does let you play, it's a fun experience. I timed it and it takes upwards of 20 minutes from loading the game to actually being able to play it. As if Sledgehammer doesn't have enough to deal with after the horrible launch and crappy servers, they also need to address cheaters. Folks using modded controllers in order to dive down withGame is garbage, i only gave it a 3 because once it does let you play, it's a fun experience. I timed it and it takes upwards of 20 minutes from loading the game to actually being able to play it. As if Sledgehammer doesn't have enough to deal with after the horrible launch and crappy servers, they also need to address cheaters. Folks using modded controllers in order to dive down with lightning speed once you're shooting them is just dumb. The quick scoping with the sniper rifles is also a joke. If they wanted this game to be a close to realistic as they set out to do, they would stop this completely. No where in the history of wars are there snipers that run and gun. You have to put your eye on the scope and then take your shot. One of these developers one of these days needs to address this. Campaign is great. Good story amazing graphics, but online waiting, load times and cheaters make this game a bad one. When crtiics rate it at 80 and users have it at 3.9 it really tells you about the paid to rate critic situation. Stay away from this game.… Expand
  61. DBurkeG
    Nov 24, 2017
    5
    There are a few reviewers giving this game high ratings. At least one of them attempts to insult those giving the game low reviews. There are a few possible reasons to give this game a high review. Maybe those reviewers played a different, maybe beta, version, that actually had more working parts. Maybe this is their second or third first person shooter, and this game was actuallyThere are a few reviewers giving this game high ratings. At least one of them attempts to insult those giving the game low reviews. There are a few possible reasons to give this game a high review. Maybe those reviewers played a different, maybe beta, version, that actually had more working parts. Maybe this is their second or third first person shooter, and this game was actually better than the other one or two. It's possible. They could be the designers of the game, or their friends and relatives. Or they are idiots. This game is not better than 90% of the other CoD games, or Tribes, Doom, Halo, Battlefield (except Battlefield Hardline), and the list goes on. Give this game a seven, maybe... The 1's and 2's are a bit harsh. 8's, 9's, 10's... Those reviewers just look silly to those of us with any experience in the genre. My guess is that most of the negative reviews have come from folks like myself that have been playing first person shooters for many years and this one does not rate in the top 30. These dweebs act like we are complaining about the game because we are getting killed? Is it the other way around and those giving this game a high score are thrilled because they are performing much better now that the game is so skewed?

    Play is smooth. A few maps support whatever play style you prefer. Others strongly benefit either the submachinegunner, or the sniper. The sldkf;lkjad;lifj!@#%^@#$^& sniper rifle. Who is the %*^% jerk that decided sniper rifles should, yet again, kill people with one quick trigger shot to the knee while multiple rounds from assault rifles or light machine guns is insufficient to kill. End of mission kill cams showing the lame sniper pow pow powing 3 in a row while other players have to EARN it. Really, the game play programming seems to be pretty good, but THE GAME isn't so hot. The maps aren't great. It's like Hexen and the other hundreds of first person shooters did not come before this game was made. I just don't want to be a sprinting sub machine gun user, or a sniper. I want to whine about not being able to play the game the way I want to play it. Oh yeah, a bunch of stuff out side of battle does not work. The wander around and get stuff area is silly. Arg. I prepaid for the special edition with season passes... A lame Call of Duty???? Some better than others throughout franchise history, but this is a new low. Battlefield Hardline was lame too, and I prepaid for that one. Lesson learned. These franchises are just waiting for me to prepay and then whamo, mediocrity. Every other day there seems to be an update to this game. Maybe a big game company should buy the franchise. One that will be ready for launch. Gosh I am irritated. I have probably played a thousand computer and console games since 1980. This isn't one of the worst games I have played, but the disappointment level makes it pretty frustrating.    … Expand
  62. JustMK
    Dec 30, 2017
    1
    Boringest Call of Duty that put me into sleep with first minutes of gameplay. I really liked Advanced Warfare and Infinite Warfare for their awesome futuristing setting, and I completely bored, annoyed of WWII theme in 2000's.
    I want back AW/IW-like CoD games. That was awesome
  63. TheFreeman148
    Nov 7, 2017
    7
    Been a huge Call of Duty fan for over a decade now and this rendition is good but simply not great. The campaign has some great cinematics and graphics but it is extremely boring and repetitive. The first couple of missions feel great but that feeling washes away after your 100th Nazi kill. There's just nothing really pulling me in here. The multiplayer has some nice additions like theBeen a huge Call of Duty fan for over a decade now and this rendition is good but simply not great. The campaign has some great cinematics and graphics but it is extremely boring and repetitive. The first couple of missions feel great but that feeling washes away after your 100th Nazi kill. There's just nothing really pulling me in here. The multiplayer has some nice additions like the Headquarters which basically adds a Destiny like "kick-back area" that allows you to interact with players. I do really like this because it adds more to the wait times in between matches. The interface is kind of confusing at first but you get used to it eventually. In terms of actual gameplay in multiplayer, there are so many hardos ALREADY. Finding a lobby without at least 2 prestigers is almost impossible. My suggestion is to get the game ASAP so you can keep up with everyone already playing. FInally, Zombies is very well done. New enemy varieties come in waves and the guns feel really great to use. I gave this game a 7 because I feel like there is just something I wish was here but isn't. Maybe time will add new features but until then i'll be playing off and on.… Expand
  64. Broyax
    Feb 7, 2019
    1
    Voici l'Appel du Devoir numéro 425621556 dont le sujet se déroule cette fois pendant la Seconde Guerre Mondiale... comme un certain Appel du Devoir 2 il y a des lunes et des lunes ! quelle originalité, les bras nous en tombent et nous en restons bouche bée.

    C'est reparti donc comme en 40 ou 44 plutôt pour sauver le monde libre mais occupé et comme jadis, c'est la foire aux scripts dans    Voici l'Appel du Devoir numéro 425621556 dont le sujet se déroule cette fois pendant la Seconde Guerre Mondiale... comme un certain Appel du Devoir 2 il y a des lunes et des lunes ! quelle originalité, les bras nous en tombent et nous en restons bouche bée.

    C'est reparti donc comme en 40 ou 44 plutôt pour sauver le monde libre mais occupé et comme jadis, c'est la foire aux scripts dans ce jeu-couloir certes spectaculaire mais rapidement aussi ennuyeux qu'un discours à l'Assemblée. En vérité, on s'ennuie si vite qu'on envoit des SMS et qu'on lâche des "kikoos" sur les réseaux sochiasses.

    Aux scripts innombrables viennent se greffer des saloperies de QTE et si la vie ne remonte plus toute seule (incroyable...) si on peut utiliser des trousses de soin, le jeu reste fidèle à lui-même, entièrement suspendu à votre bon vouloir, car la guerre c'est vous qui allez la gagner et personne d'autre : tant que vous ne percutez pas le script qui déclenche l'évènement suivant, les ennemis et vos copains se mettent sur la gueule et ressuscitent en masse ad vitam eternam comme des **** bots coincés dans une boucle. C'est assez risible à voir !

    On reste en tout cas souvent à l'étroit dans ces niveaux et la jouabilité n'a pas évolué d'un iota pour sa part : épaulez, visez et visez surtout la tête parce que sinon il en faudra des bastos pour les zigouiller ces andouilles ! De toute façon, on a jamais l'impression de vraiment jouer mais d'être coincé dans un caddy de supermarché lancé à grande vitesse avec des dialogues écrits par la ménagère de moins de 50 ans.

    Même le bilan technique qui devrait être bon, voire très bon, ne l'est pas totalement... En effet, si on a la 4K à 60 im/s (sur la X), toutes les cinématiques semblent soit à 30, soit victimes de sévères ralentissements... Le jeu reste terne (à tous les égards d'ailleurs) et depuis cet abruti de Soldat Ryan, toutes les oeuvres "modernes" sur la WWII veulent nous faire croire que les vaillants soldats étaient daltoniens.

    Enfin, je ne comprends pas pourquoi ce retour sur la WWII qui commence à sentir le réchauffé... remarquez, parler de "réchauffé" à propos d'un Call of est un pléonasme doublé d'une lapalissade. On dit que la guerre est terrible et c'est vrai : terriblement ennuyeuse et percluse de rhumatismes comme ce Call of qui n'en peut plus : achevez-le et enterrez-le dans le désert, qu'on en parle plus !    … Expand
  65. thehonestwalrus
    Jan 9, 2018
    9
    A beautiful and well-written campaign. A pretty mediocre multiplayer mode, but very solid gameplay.
  66. TrumpHater67420
    Nov 8, 2017
    6
    Call Of Duty WWII is my favorite COD in the series. It has a great campaign and fun multiplayer, but it has one major flaw. As of a few days after launch, COD WWII has major multiplayer connection issues. Nobody appears in the HQ, just myself, and about 20-30% of games I get disconnected from at the end and lose all my XP earned. This is very frustrating as I would be prestiged by now (ICall Of Duty WWII is my favorite COD in the series. It has a great campaign and fun multiplayer, but it has one major flaw. As of a few days after launch, COD WWII has major multiplayer connection issues. Nobody appears in the HQ, just myself, and about 20-30% of games I get disconnected from at the end and lose all my XP earned. This is very frustrating as I would be prestiged by now (I am Rank 50). This is a great game but I would not buy it now, wait a few weeks for server issues to be fixed.… Expand
  67. cem12
    Nov 10, 2017
    5
    Gráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas lasGráficamente el juego está bien, lo único que puedo decir bueno de el. El modo Zombies esta entretenido, y es totalmente diferente a los vistos hasta hoy. La historia de la segunda guerra mundial para nada se parece a lo que representa en este juego. Se han burlado de la gente. Metiendo mujeres en la segunda guerra mundial, uniformes inventados, armas fuera de su tiempo y pantallas las cuales jamás hubo batalla alguna. Es un juego lleno de micro transacciones, fomentando la compra de productos ya que te muestra descaradamente lo que le toca al resto de jugadores. Los emblemas nazis "volaron", jamás podrás elegir uniforme aleman. Siendo americano juegas con armas alemanas, no te da opción a elegir. Sigo enamorado el Cod: World at War, un juego que sí cumplía con la historia, escenarios y soldados. pensaba que Activision por fin lo iba a volver a hacer, pero me equivoque. Han creado un juego de "guerra antigua" por llamarlo de alguna manera, para que los "niños rata" sean felices. Creando micro transacciones, matar por matar ya que no matas Nazis, sino alemanes que no han hecho nada; poniendo mujeres que apenas las hubo en los ejércitos alemanes ni americanos, creando las cajas de de premios "traga perras" Lo único que celebro, es que por fin se abandonen los malditos juegos futuristas.… Expand
  68. MBK
    Nov 11, 2017
    6
    This game has okay campaign, has okay multiplayer, has okay zombies. They have included micro- transactions which are cosmetic only but this will change soon. Conclusion overall this game is okay, would I pay full price? Definitely not because this game will soon be a pay to win game with Activision ripping us off even more.
  69. TheWalkingBBQ
    Nov 13, 2017
    8
    Lets be honest here. We (most) hate call of duty. Don't get me wrong from 2012 their games have been trash but this one is surprisingly good. It starts out to D-Day where you actually feel like you are their and the story is really good with balanced graphics and amazing sounds. Multiplayer feels like black ops 1 which in my opinion was fun and good. The zombies is pretty good to! TheirsLets be honest here. We (most) hate call of duty. Don't get me wrong from 2012 their games have been trash but this one is surprisingly good. It starts out to D-Day where you actually feel like you are their and the story is really good with balanced graphics and amazing sounds. Multiplayer feels like black ops 1 which in my opinion was fun and good. The zombies is pretty good to! Theirs new zombies and its really cool. Don't listen to other reviews, They are either mad because they are super pissed with Cod franchise or they suck at the game XD. But pick up this game its really worth it. The headquarters are really dumb I don't think they needed it but its okay just an extra thing. Black ops 3 sucks a lot and people like it. I hated the series after that mainly because i spent 100 on it and thought it was gonna be good and it turned out to be trash but then i bought this and it made me happy. i still hate treyarch....… Expand
  70. OGmackPLAYRcool
    Nov 13, 2017
    5
    VERY average.

    Graphics - Average Single player - Average Multiplayer - Average Gameplay - Average Etc, etc etc. I haven't purchased a cod game in about 4 years and I went into this one expecting it to feel a little new, fresh, or different. Unfortunately it wasn't any of those. It comes across very cartoonish and unrealistic to me. Single player feels like a Michael bay movie but    VERY average.

    Graphics - Average
    Single player - Average
    Multiplayer - Average
    Gameplay - Average
    Etc, etc etc.

    I haven't purchased a cod game in about 4 years and I went into this one expecting it to feel a little new, fresh, or different. Unfortunately it wasn't any of those. It comes across very cartoonish and unrealistic to me. Single player feels like a Michael bay movie but doesn't have the graphical wow factor to be memorable in any way.    … Expand
  71. Manyflange
    Nov 15, 2017
    5
    Honestly, I really wanted and hoped I would enjoy this game.
    I'm a long term CoD player, it's my favourite and most played multiplayer IP. So when I bought and played this I was sorely disappointed. Please don't listen to the 0-3 reviews, and equally please ignore the 8-10 reviews, they're total bull.
    I won't go too in depth as to why I don't like this game I'll just list a few points I    Honestly, I really wanted and hoped I would enjoy this game.
    I'm a long term CoD player, it's my favourite and most played multiplayer IP. So when I bought and played this I was sorely disappointed. Please don't listen to the 0-3 reviews, and equally please ignore the 8-10 reviews, they're total bull.
    I won't go too in depth as to why I don't like this game I'll just list a few points I think are most important.
    Everyone is raving about war, I can understand why people like it but for me dying 10+ times is infuriating and pointless, if I wanted to play a purely objective game mode is play battlefield who actually have a player base who will play the objective.
    Zombies is good at first but very very boring and too complicated to play more than a few times for me.
    Campaign was pretty good to be honest.
    The multiplayer is the core to this game and I hate the new class system it's restrictive and honestly ruined the game for me, I prestiges all classes just for the weapons then changed them all to mountain. Spawns are terrible, maps are terrible and theres 9?! There's literally 3 decent maps. Weapons are all about the assault rifles of the ppsh.
    Quickscoping is here.
    I'll say no more it's not worth the time to structure this review knowing about 5 people will read, but if you are reading and a real a big cod fan, I was 38th in Europe on WaW and It will take alot of convincing for me to buy the next game. Traded in.    … Expand
  72. LordDork
    Nov 19, 2017
    5
    This is a good game to me. The graphics are good and the game play is fine. The zombies I really enjoy and for me I haven't had this much fun in a call of duty zombies mode for a long time. The campaign is och I played threw it once and I'm good with just playing threw it once. I found the headquarters fine to mess around in with friends. The bad things about are that the servers on theThis is a good game to me. The graphics are good and the game play is fine. The zombies I really enjoy and for me I haven't had this much fun in a call of duty zombies mode for a long time. The campaign is och I played threw it once and I'm good with just playing threw it once. I found the headquarters fine to mess around in with friends. The bad things about are that the servers on the game are terrible. When me and my friends leave a game everyone but the party leader gets put in limbo where all we can see is a black screen and we have to get kicked from the party and re invited to the party for it to fix. Until they fix it there are certain guns that are way to overpowered and if anyone uses it that get tons of kills. So for me its a 5 just because of how bad the servers are right now and there are times I have a hard time playing the game because of the servers but if they ever get them fixed the game is around a 7 in my opinion so is worth it if you get it on sale.… Expand
  73. Droppen
    Nov 24, 2017
    5
    This is an alright game but it could be better because the maps are terrible and if you're playing yourself it gets boring really quick so in my opinion, Don't buy this, go ahead and buy another game.
  74. Bunnybooce95
    Nov 29, 2017
    10
    Holy crap... This game is absolutely amazing, from running up Normandy in war mode to hearing screaming when someone is being burned from the flamethrower, yeah sure the servers are DOWNRIGHT broken, the story is okay, but this still is an amazing game, the multiplayer is balanced, the headquarters is a lot of fun and the zombies are terrifying with the jumps and intense when they are allHoly crap... This game is absolutely amazing, from running up Normandy in war mode to hearing screaming when someone is being burned from the flamethrower, yeah sure the servers are DOWNRIGHT broken, the story is okay, but this still is an amazing game, the multiplayer is balanced, the headquarters is a lot of fun and the zombies are terrifying with the jumps and intense when they are all coming at you. THIS CALL OF DUTY IS THE BEST CALL DUTY SINCE MW!!!!!!!!. Sledgehammer has done SO MUCH BETTER! Since AW, I can't wait to buy their dlc pack which has MORE war scenarios, more maps for multiplayer and zombies( obviously). I do some minor problems like a lot of lag sometimes, one thing about this game is about how polished this game is, when you inspect your weapon it looks SOOOOOOOO GOOOD looking.… Expand
  75. OscarAdcock
    Nov 11, 2019
    0
    It’s actually the worst, just not enjoyable for me in any way with friends or solo.
    They made a mockery of WW2 and Sledghammer as a credible developer, **** this game...
  76. leltrollface
    Jan 19, 2018
    0
    This game is very"weird". sometimes its fun, other times you feel like screaming at your TV or monitor.

    CAMPAIGN. The campaign is all over the place.My favorite mission in this "campaign" is the first mission. if the first mission is the only good mission, thats when you have just **** up big time. I legit forgot the ending, but i dont need to know the ending to know what its gonna    This game is very"weird". sometimes its fun, other times you feel like screaming at your TV or monitor.

    CAMPAIGN.

    The campaign is all over the place.My favorite mission in this "campaign" is the first mission. if the first mission is the only good mission, thats when you have just **** up big time. I legit forgot the ending, but i dont need to know the ending to know what its gonna be. Its gonna end all like your the best and no one else could have done what you did. the "campaign" feels more like im watching a on rails movie then a actual game. The amount of explosions in the "campaign" felt like i was watching a battle unfold in fallout 4 if they all had fat mans.

    ZOMBIES.

    Zombies is actually really underrated. I mean, i know it do'sent really have anything special about it but if you think about it, neither did nacth dier untoten from WAW, same with verrtuck, shi no numa, and kino der toten. people always say those are the best maps ever, but they only say that because its treyarch. Like the "campaign" theirs a lot of explosions . Im actually okay with it because its made up so i dont give a **** now lets go into the biggest part of the game yet, the reason you bought this ****ing game.

    MULTI--wait i gotta wait for a update? k.
    *1 hour later*
    MULTIPLAYER.

    Multiplayer is really unbalanced. i mean all of these "nerf's" and "buffs" really do nothing. so what if they nerfed the STG or the FG42, those guns are still really overpowered. the maps are all the same in this game, left middle right.The new DLC guns are trash, the gewher 43 is like a m1a1 carbine, the sten is like a **** version of the grease gun, the GPMG is worse then pre-buffed Bren, the Ice Pick needs a little more range, the trench knifve is ok. my favriote map is opetation neptune. and thats it. TA TA, ****    … Expand
  77. tastybaldeagle
    Feb 5, 2018
    7
    Underwhelming zombies, campaign, and multiplayer, but still somewhat playable all around. Maybe worth purchasing but probably should just wait another year for a Treyarch game.
  78. SKSK
    Jul 22, 2018
    9
    A fantastic experience. It has perhaps the best Multiplayer in the Call of Duty series.
  79. cableguy3333
    Apr 30, 2019
    7
    It has an enjoyable solo campaign but the game doesn't have a steady climb rate of difficulty, instead has spikes of extremely hard bits in random bits of the game and possibly the hardest part of the game is right at the start trying to get off the beach which is certainly a no no for a game even though in reality this would be factually correct as alot of people died on those beaches
  80. Misaghjrh
    Jun 19, 2019
    10
    In this review, only the negative aspects of the game are considered. The purpose of this work is to help you to get a better decision on the purchase of the game

    Weak points:
    - There is nothing here :) go and buy this game ASAP!
  81. RamboDash
    Jan 20, 2018
    3
    Bottom line: it's just a bad game.

    I got sick of call of duty after MW2. I grew up with the franchise and had been playing since COD 2. I've been playing mostly Battlefield since 2013, but when I heard COD was ditching the futuristic and was heading back to WW2 I was interested. But it really is just more of the same with a WW2 skin. I thought modern warfare 2 was too fast, but this is    Bottom line: it's just a bad game.

    I got sick of call of duty after MW2. I grew up with the franchise and had been playing since COD 2. I've been playing mostly Battlefield since 2013, but when I heard COD was ditching the futuristic and was heading back to WW2 I was interested. But it really is just more of the same with a WW2 skin. I thought modern warfare 2 was too fast, but this is ridiculous. The game feels like a round of speedball with everyone on crack. Waaay too fast. waaaay too reliant on how fast you can get your sights on and pull the trigger than actual teamwork. Waaaay too easy to die and know exactly where your enemy is going after your death. There's things you begin to take for granted when you switch over to a game like battlefield - destructible environments, different classes that actually PLAY differently, vehicles, large maps, more team play... I could go on. The game feels like it caters to hormonal teenage boys.

    This game is very easy to hate. Very easy to laugh at. And for very good reason. I didn't buy the last 6 call of duty games before this and I will never buy another one after. I've learned my lesson.    … Expand
  82. Emperor_Unicorn
    Jun 2, 2018
    1
    The Campaign Mode was okay... Nazi Zombies is fun with friends.

    The Multiplayer? I'm never buying another Call of Duty title every again. Not unless they actually bring about dedicated servers. Every single matching having one to two players that are moving 1.5x faster than everyone else, just mopping up kills is no fun. I'd recommend buying this this game up when it's $20 or less,    The Campaign Mode was okay... Nazi Zombies is fun with friends.

    The Multiplayer? I'm never buying another Call of Duty title every again. Not unless they actually bring about dedicated servers. Every single matching having one to two players that are moving 1.5x faster than everyone else, just mopping up kills is no fun.

    I'd recommend buying this this game up when it's $20 or less, or rent it and see what you think.    … Expand
  83. Spaceacer2012
    Dec 28, 2017
    7
    I had fun... Good game... Campaign was a decent length and there was fun to be had. Zombies was good but I think the COD Zombies modes have gotten over complicated after BO2. I go back to Black Ops zombie maps from time to time, I don't see myself revisiting COD: WW2 zombies in the future. Also World at War has this game beat, but still, I like this game too, just not as much... KeepI had fun... Good game... Campaign was a decent length and there was fun to be had. Zombies was good but I think the COD Zombies modes have gotten over complicated after BO2. I go back to Black Ops zombie maps from time to time, I don't see myself revisiting COD: WW2 zombies in the future. Also World at War has this game beat, but still, I like this game too, just not as much... Keep trying Activision.… Expand
  84. DausenMoore
    Dec 7, 2020
    2
    I barely touched WW2 because it was so bad. It's easily my most hated CoD of all time and I genuinely have a hard time thinking of anything positive to say about it. Bad maps, bad gameplay, bad almost everything. I am aware it received a lot of improvements after I quit though so it may be worth trying now.
  85. Wander22
    Feb 17, 2019
    4
    Gameplay/Mechanics: 6
    Sound/Music: 8
    Graphics/Art: 8.5 Story/Atmosphere: 1 OVERALL: 4/10 Concentration camps and the holocaust covered in a call of duty campaign?? ill-conceived and very ignorant. In a game where you shoot each other dead with tie dye grenade launchers and wacko killstreaks, this subject matter should not be within a 1000 feet of this game's narrative. The tone is    Gameplay/Mechanics: 6
    Sound/Music: 8
    Graphics/Art: 8.5
    Story/Atmosphere: 1
    OVERALL: 4/10

    Concentration camps and the holocaust covered in a call of duty campaign?? ill-conceived and very ignorant. In a game where you shoot each other dead with tie dye grenade launchers and wacko killstreaks, this subject matter should not be within a 1000 feet of this game's narrative. The tone is completely incoherent. Severe missteps on Sledgehammer's part. The characters/story all showed promise up until the very end, which is even more disappointing. Multiplayer is riddled with microtransaction/loot box garbage and overall isn't a very solid experience even to play. The campaign does have a few really cool moments, and the technical aspects of the game are quite impressive, but overall this game is an misguided mess.    … Expand
  86. Muskrat147
    Feb 8, 2018
    6
    With one of the worst launches of any game in recent memory, Call of Duty WWII has tried desperately to claw its way out of the terrific hole that it dug for itself on day one, and all there is to say for it is “meh”. WWII is a COD game, to say the least, and has everything you could expect from the series at this point. The Online Multiplayer is fine, even though the map design is,With one of the worst launches of any game in recent memory, Call of Duty WWII has tried desperately to claw its way out of the terrific hole that it dug for itself on day one, and all there is to say for it is “meh”. WWII is a COD game, to say the least, and has everything you could expect from the series at this point. The Online Multiplayer is fine, even though the map design is, frankly, utter garbage. Each map feels uninspired and lazy in its design, and, my God, the Three-Lane-Structure is just the worst. The Campaign is pretty enjoyable, surprisingly - the relationships between the characters throughout the 7-8 hour ordeal is reminiscent of Saving Private Ryan and Band of Brothers, and the story borrows heavily from the two properties as well. Headquarters is a welcome yet heavily flawed addition to the franchise, but it manages to offer some interesting activities to complete away from the chaos of the Multiplayer. Call of Duty WWII is a decent game, but does not live up to its expectations as a game that spent, supposedly, three whole years in development.… Expand
  87. koolaidman486
    Apr 26, 2018
    0
    Call of Duty World War 2 is the single worst video game that I have ever played. Every single "professional" reviewer is wrong here.
    Campaign:
    Generic One theatre of the war Bland Literally MW3 but in World War 2 without any of the character Zombies: Flat downgrade to Treyarch and Infinity Ward in almost every way, fails at being scary or fun. Multiplayer: Connections are ****    Call of Duty World War 2 is the single worst video game that I have ever played. Every single "professional" reviewer is wrong here.
    Campaign:
    Generic
    One theatre of the war
    Bland
    Literally MW3 but in World War 2 without any of the character

    Zombies:
    Flat downgrade to Treyarch and Infinity Ward in almost every way, fails at being scary or fun.

    Multiplayer:
    Connections are ****
    Balance is far and away the worst in the series
    DLC weapons are way too common (close to as many or more than Infinite Warfare during that game's entire cycle, and this game is 6 months in as of me posting this).
    You will unload on people and have them take 0 hits, multiple times a match
    You will be shot around corners
    The division system is complete trash when compared to Pic 10 and the classic system
    Maps are mostly bland, boring, samey, and generally terrible
    Spawns are laughable

    Yeah, I will under zero circumstances recommend this game to anybody. If you want a frustrating and overall crap experience, this is the game for you, even then, Ghosts will only cost you $15 so go for the miserable experience that actually works, not this pile of literal garbage.    … Expand
  88. Alex_Pilgrim008
    May 10, 2023
    8
    "Call of Duty: WW II" is a solid, but not superb shooter. After the release of "Battlefield 1", it feels like a slight let down due to its reliance on well-worn FPS tropes. The game is fun, but it steals ideas from both "Destiny" and "Overwatch". While I appreciate the return to the series' roots, the WW II setting has been a bit played out. Developer Sledgehammer Games has done an"Call of Duty: WW II" is a solid, but not superb shooter. After the release of "Battlefield 1", it feels like a slight let down due to its reliance on well-worn FPS tropes. The game is fun, but it steals ideas from both "Destiny" and "Overwatch". While I appreciate the return to the series' roots, the WW II setting has been a bit played out. Developer Sledgehammer Games has done an admirable job with the campaign and multiplayer, but none of it stands out from what's been done before. The same goes for the new Zombies mode; it's enjoyable, but too similar to past versions.

    Ultimately, a lack of innovation is the reason "Call of Duty: WW II" doesn't rank up with the best COD titles. Yes, there are now soldier classes in multiplayer, but aside from "War", there are no new competitive modes to speak of. The maps are also a bit lacking in creative design. Regardless, fans of "World at War" and "Call of Duty 2" should enjoy the game despite its inferiority. I personally think it's a big step up from "Infinite Warfare". It's fast, fluid and enjoyable, although it's not the best. I'd give it an 8 out of 10    … Expand
  89. irbegui
    Dec 31, 2017
    6
    una campaña corta que fue buena pero el final se quedo muy corto, pero me gusto, el multiplayer aun no lo pruebo pero espero que sea decente , aunque lo mejor de cod es la campaña y esta me decepciono, su multiplayer es muy inestable y los mapas son para camp ... aburrido
  90. weirdmagican21
    Jul 3, 2018
    0
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. awful i thought this was gonna be the cod i got to max level on but it was not because of the connection issues and loading problems this is the last call of duty i am buying and the game made 500 million dollars and yet they still put loot boxes in it.… Expand
  91. computerfinch
    Jan 18, 2018
    5
    This was my first extended game on my new xbox one. I had to get a couple of hours in before I started enjoying playing it. let me preface this by saying that I'm nothing special when gaming; I usually have to be at the easier levels to get through. That being said, I spent far too much time on the beach dying, so much so, that I nearly gave up and quit. I didn't, and as I got better IThis was my first extended game on my new xbox one. I had to get a couple of hours in before I started enjoying playing it. let me preface this by saying that I'm nothing special when gaming; I usually have to be at the easier levels to get through. That being said, I spent far too much time on the beach dying, so much so, that I nearly gave up and quit. I didn't, and as I got better I started to enjoy it more and more. But, at the end of the day this is a mediocre game, and I wouldn't spend new game money on it.
    What's to like? The graphics are intense....maybe some of the best I've seen. I haven't got a lot of experience, but jumping from bioshock infinite to this is incredible. I also enjoyed the game play. Like I said, once I got better, I got in to it. I loved the sighting with scopes, I got immersed in the play and enjoyed the excursions from regular play style (there is a fighter plane mission that is kind of cool).
    What's to hate? Far too much. First and foremost, it's short. So much so that I felt cheated...just as I was getting in to it, it ended. Second, waaaaay too much video. I've never been fond of these sequences and my god, the end of the game is a half hour of video. wtf? I also really hated how much I would die, and then have to redo some portion of the game. There are also some crappy sequences where you have no idea what you need to do to succeed; weird sequences where you finally figure out you have to move your right stick to center and hit x, etc. etc. There's also an insane mission you don't realize you have to do in stealth mode to beat, so you spend an hour fighting through going wth?
    All in all, I think I liked playing it, but if I knew ahead of time I would've gotten dishonored instead.    … Expand
  92. Naruto78909
    Apr 2, 2018
    10
    I am probaly one of the few who bought this for the campaign and this game really was way better than infinite warfare i played multiplayer a few times it was ok and the story was really great retelling of ww2 the invasion of germany the only problem is all the cutscenes
  93. MollyMagoo
    Dec 21, 2017
    1
    WORST COD OF ALL TIME. I generously give it one point for removing jet packs. I've played a lot of COD's. Some I loved, some I liked, some I didn't like. This is the first one I hate. I want my money back. I feel cheated. Multiplayer is an absolute **** show. Activision buys its servers at local garage sales, and hires high school drop-outs and homeless people to run them. Only 9WORST COD OF ALL TIME. I generously give it one point for removing jet packs. I've played a lot of COD's. Some I loved, some I liked, some I didn't like. This is the first one I hate. I want my money back. I feel cheated. Multiplayer is an absolute **** show. Activision buys its servers at local garage sales, and hires high school drop-outs and homeless people to run them. Only 9 multiplayer maps at launch, and 7 of them suck. The other 2 aren't very good either. If someone tells you the 3 War mode maps count as multiplayer maps, spit in their face. This game is utterly devoid of content and any sort of personality. The new divisions system is **** Sprint distances/sprint out times are **** This game does everything it can to punish you for trying to enjoy COD as we've always known it.. Don't waste your time or money on this trash. I will never buy another Sledgehammer COD.… Expand
  94. MRBeanJoga
    Jan 14, 2022
    5
    Cool campaign, mediocre multiplayer with bad designed maps and mediocre zombies mode.
  95. blakefreeman64
    Jan 30, 2018
    10
    Starting off with the campaign. Most people do not like or purchase Call of Duty for the campaign, but I always play campaign before I go play online. i think the campaign was one of the best ones that they have made. It does not beat MW2 but I think the campaign has great graphics and a good story line. After the campaign is complete then i go to online and play online. I personally thinkStarting off with the campaign. Most people do not like or purchase Call of Duty for the campaign, but I always play campaign before I go play online. i think the campaign was one of the best ones that they have made. It does not beat MW2 but I think the campaign has great graphics and a good story line. After the campaign is complete then i go to online and play online. I personally think online is great, the graphics and game play are great. Overall I think this game is a winner, and will continue to play it.… Expand
  96. neolaron
    Feb 2, 2018
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. the campian was good but the multiplayer was terebole and was like bad copyright from battlefled1… Expand
  97. cdh1996
    Feb 3, 2018
    6
    As someone that hadn't really been that into COD since they switched away from boots on the ground gameplay, I was excited to hear that Sledgehammer Games was going away from the jetpacking ways of recent COD titles.

    Generally speaking, the game is pretty average to below average. While there is a decent selection of weapons, and more have come out as the game has matured, the balancing    As someone that hadn't really been that into COD since they switched away from boots on the ground gameplay, I was excited to hear that Sledgehammer Games was going away from the jetpacking ways of recent COD titles.

    Generally speaking, the game is pretty average to below average. While there is a decent selection of weapons, and more have come out as the game has matured, the balancing is still off, most notably with the shotguns. Maps on the other hand are severely lacking. At release, there were only nine maps, and most of them were pretty terrible. New DLC was released that addressed this issue a bit, with the inclusion of a few new maps. While this does help the issue a bit, I surely don't think players should have to pay $15 just to play on a couple of decent maps.

    A couple things that I have enjoyed thus far have been the inclusion of the War game mode, the Headquarters, and the supply drop system, specifically the many ways that they can be earned through gameplay. The War game mode has provided a different style of game where players don't have to worry about kills and deaths so much, which allows for a better objective based mode. I think that is a great addition to a game where normal objective based matches are played more like a team deathmatch than they are a true objective mode. Further, I think the inclusion of the Headquarters has been nice, as it is just something different to play around with between games. Finally, I am very impressed with the way that contracts and challenges work in regards to earning supply drops daily, which allows players to earn new weapons and uniforms for their characters just by completing a handful of easy objectives each day.

    Overall, the game does play pretty well, but it has too many issues to be considered a classic COD title.    … Expand
  98. bsg0075
    Feb 14, 2018
    0
    in a word - THEFT. First, the game is a buggy pile of garbage. The hit markers mean nothing and then of course the bullet drop is non-existent. Four months the game has been out and there are THREE maps for war - THREE. Instead the releases have been uniforms, weapons and calling cards which add ZERO TO THE GAME PLAY. Second, the lobby is setup with features that don't exist -in a word - THEFT. First, the game is a buggy pile of garbage. The hit markers mean nothing and then of course the bullet drop is non-existent. Four months the game has been out and there are THREE maps for war - THREE. Instead the releases have been uniforms, weapons and calling cards which add ZERO TO THE GAME PLAY. Second, the lobby is setup with features that don't exist - Weapons Paint - coming soon since day one... that isn't soon. Finally, the crates for purchase are a rip off. 95% of the crates are calling cards and useless uniforms. THEFT. This is the last COD I will buy. RUN AWAY… Expand
  99. marcus_creamer
    Feb 19, 2018
    0
    I have been a COD fan for many years now. I love Hard Core Team Death Match, but I'm here to say: WWII is the worst game I have ever bought!!!!!! I hate I wasted my money on this stupid game. The maps are really awful. I will not recommend this game to anyone.
  100. BurgerBum4892
    Mar 30, 2018
    8
    I'm very shocked about the negative feedback that this game has gotten. I think that it's one of the greatest call of duty games to come out sine the series has moved to the next gen of consoles (Xbox One and Ps4). The game doesn't have a chance with COD games like BO2 our MW1 but for how the quality of the series has been lowered down, if feel that WWII has given this quality to a newI'm very shocked about the negative feedback that this game has gotten. I think that it's one of the greatest call of duty games to come out sine the series has moved to the next gen of consoles (Xbox One and Ps4). The game doesn't have a chance with COD games like BO2 our MW1 but for how the quality of the series has been lowered down, if feel that WWII has given this quality to a new standard for the COD series now. Now I hope that COD B04 can raise the bar higher to get the COD series going again… Expand
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

52
#52 Best Xbox One Game of 2017
8
#8 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2017
6
#6 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2017

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 21 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 21
  2. Mixed: 3 out of 21
  3. Negative: 0 out of 21
  1. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    Dec 12, 2017
    80
    A streamlined multiplayer and less gimmicky single-player gives CoD a nice refresh.
  2. Edge Magazine
    Dec 10, 2017
    70
    At its best it's a game of tactics for even the most casual player. [Issue#314, p.112]
  3. The Sydney Morning Herald
    Nov 29, 2017
    70
    This is another fun, fleeting, exceptionally good-looking Call of Duty game, but its World War II theme doesn't add much besides bringing some of its mechanics back down to Earth.
    Read full review
See all critic reviews »