Call of Duty: Modern Warfare

 Xbox One
User Score
4.0

Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 1375 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 496 out of 1375
  2. Mixed: 75 out of 1375
  3. Negative: 804 out of 1375
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Matthew38
    Jan 26, 2020
    4
    Maps that supports campers, microtransactions, bad Maps. The only thing that is good in this game, is the control.
  2. RobertoLins
    Jul 15, 2020
    4
    call of duty has good graphics but I found many bugs, I hope they fix the errors.
  3. Zumbie101
    May 7, 2022
    4
    Decent enough COD game, campaign is short and fairly enjoyable, characters are okay and some missions have variety. Multiplayer is simaler to it was years ago, fun enough with friends for a few games, cant complain about the game itself at all. Fairly solid COD game. However game is really glitchy and runs very poorly and you are forced to download warzone to play it for some reason, gameDecent enough COD game, campaign is short and fairly enjoyable, characters are okay and some missions have variety. Multiplayer is simaler to it was years ago, fun enough with friends for a few games, cant complain about the game itself at all. Fairly solid COD game. However game is really glitchy and runs very poorly and you are forced to download warzone to play it for some reason, game took nearly a day to install all that nonsense and continues to run poorly aftewards. Campaign straight up does not work sometimes. The game itself is good but cant recommend due to poor performance… Expand
  4. LunarWrens
    Nov 5, 2020
    4
    Call of Campers: Modern Campfare
    campaign is great though, but multiplayer is the worst in the franchise
  5. Razorjim
    May 6, 2021
    4
    I understand that this game has a lot of content which I will give it praise for but most of the maps are too big with too many camping spots and is it just me or does the new engine feel inferior and too weird compared to the older one?
  6. kholland65
    Nov 4, 2019
    3
    First of all, It’s funny watching all the butt hurt russians pissed that their **** hole country that is actually quite evil and whose recent history is a bit dodgy (soviet union anyone) is the bad guy in this game. Yes we know who you are by your terrible English. Campaign is great, multiplayer is one of the worst yet.
  7. Ysegrim
    Feb 21, 2020
    3
    The Campaign was ok (Unless you are a Russian citizen), but the multiplayer is just bad. Especially the maps and the spawn points are a catastrophe. Nearly all players are camping because the maps reward this behaviour. They are mostly slow and boring matches. The absolute worst is the Map Schippement, it was really funny in WWII, in this one it happens quite often that you spawn in frontThe Campaign was ok (Unless you are a Russian citizen), but the multiplayer is just bad. Especially the maps and the spawn points are a catastrophe. Nearly all players are camping because the maps reward this behaviour. They are mostly slow and boring matches. The absolute worst is the Map Schippement, it was really funny in WWII, in this one it happens quite often that you spawn in front of shooting enemies or in their killstreak.
    Also annoying, is this intrusive promotion of the Battlepass.    … Expand
  8. metadubrev2
    May 3, 2020
    3
    on ok game but the mere fact it takes so much storage and has so many huge (100gb) updates makes it unattractive to buy or play.
  9. AlexKidd
    Oct 26, 2019
    3
    Lack of content and terrible multiplayermaps, lootboxes that will come after the reviews are in, makes this a no go. Singleplayer is not too bad though.
  10. mlemm
    Oct 29, 2019
    3
    The gameplay and graphics in the campaign are absolutely amazing! That's something I realy enjoyed while I played this game...
    But sadly, that's the only positive thing in this game.
    I don't want to write about the singleplayer, because there is already enough here. I will only rate the multiplayer! Multiplayer is like..i can't find any words for it. It is so bad! Ground War is not    The gameplay and graphics in the campaign are absolutely amazing! That's something I realy enjoyed while I played this game...
    But sadly, that's the only positive thing in this game.
    I don't want to write about the singleplayer, because there is already enough here.
    I will only rate the multiplayer!
    Multiplayer is like..i can't find any words for it. It is so bad!
    Ground War is not playable - sniper/camper everywhere!
    TDM - time runs out before one team even hit 50 kills, because everyone is sitting around drinking tea!
    Domination..there are two kinds of people in this mode: The people who understand what to do and the people who wonder why the flag is changing it's colors. Ah, and of course the one's with broken keyboards!
    There are so many camper in this game..just terrible for people who like to rush und play a little faster.
    Also the players in the loosing team quit their games very often. So it's not unusual that you're playing 2 vs 6. Very frustating!
    I was so hyped for this game, but the fact that 80% of the players are just sitting around with a Sniper or an SMG is just annoying.
    One thing i didn't mention is spawn camping - also extrem annoying since the update, because the spawns are changing extrem slowly now.
    Rate: 3/10    … Expand
  11. Harbl
    Nov 4, 2019
    3
    New year, Same CoD. Seems like they could of done a better job copying Battlefield. Customer Support is a joke as usual. Kinda upset I fell for it again. Activision ruined the Call of Duty franchise at this point.
  12. Shogunroman
    Nov 11, 2019
    3
    Single player good graphics, forgettable story. Multiplayer camp fest, zero online achievements, not even for lvl 55 like other cod games, no incentive to play online with zero achievements to earn. The death sound when dying from a headshot or knife is terribly loud. It sounds like a cannon going off in real life. It’s so loud it makes me want to just not play.
  13. KevinJohnsBP
    Nov 28, 2019
    3
    I would have given a much higher rating if they hadn't killed every good thing about multiplayer in the latest updates. They have ruined stealth completely, somehow made spawning and camping ten times worse. Guns that didn't need to be nerfed have been nerfed
  14. IronCityBoy
    Dec 3, 2019
    3
    I paid $99 for them steelbok special edition. Played it starting with early access. Enjoyed the single player campaign, and multiplayer was pretty good. Got to level 144 before season one made me start back at 55. What do you get for playing the hell out of the game? Go back to being enlisted level 55 and nobody would know that I almost leveled out at 155 except for a few minorI paid $99 for them steelbok special edition. Played it starting with early access. Enjoyed the single player campaign, and multiplayer was pretty good. Got to level 144 before season one made me start back at 55. What do you get for playing the hell out of the game? Go back to being enlisted level 55 and nobody would know that I almost leveled out at 155 except for a few minor “badges.” No guns, banners, skins...NOTHING!!! Then comes the money grab. I paid $99 for the game and now they want me to spend more money on a battle pass to unlock all 100 levels?!? Oh, but they give you a free 20 levels but they are all bull crap and it’s one free level folllwed by 4 locked levels (the good loot), then another freebie. Enough of this I’m done.… Expand
  15. Criticbird
    Aug 15, 2020
    3
    This might go down as the WORST COD of all time, if not for Warzone. Even Warzone isn’t that great. Every patch update is 50Gb+ and they fix nothing. They only add “cool skins” and “battle pass” updates to encourage you to spend more money on top of the $60 you already paid. This game is even worse than WW2. I would rate 1 star if not for warzone. Multiplayer is unplayable from aThis might go down as the WORST COD of all time, if not for Warzone. Even Warzone isn’t that great. Every patch update is 50Gb+ and they fix nothing. They only add “cool skins” and “battle pass” updates to encourage you to spend more money on top of the $60 you already paid. This game is even worse than WW2. I would rate 1 star if not for warzone. Multiplayer is unplayable from a competitive perspective. Spawns follow little to no logic. Enemies will spawn directly into your crosshairs multiple times a game. Holding “anchor” for spawns in a competitive match is useless now. The game just spawns players anywhere on the map. The maps are made to encourage corner campers, it is impossible to check everywhere. The game has a real problem with peaker’s advantage, and angles. When one player may be completely hidden behind a wall on their screen, half of their body will be sticking out on anothers screen. You will often die from an enemy jumping around a corner before you can even see their character. The movement feels very smooth, but the game never works the way it’s supposed to. They don’t focus on fixing any problems. Especially for xbox users, you will often feel like activision is giving xbox the middle finger. Xbox has the most issues. All in all, I wish I never wasted my time on this game. If the next COD isn’t good, i wouldn’t buy any more in the future.… Expand
  16. TheGreenCow
    Oct 26, 2019
    2
    Let's start with the pros:

    - the game looks good - the campaign has some intensely captivating moments. other than that though, this is probably the worst CoD I have ever played in my life. The biggest issue is mainly that the game doesn't feel or play like a CoD game at all and I feel really robbed when the game was supposed to "go back to the roots of what made CoD a massive    Let's start with the pros:

    - the game looks good
    - the campaign has some intensely captivating moments.

    other than that though, this is probably the worst CoD I have ever played in my life. The biggest issue is mainly that the game doesn't feel or play like a CoD game at all and I feel really robbed when the game was supposed to "go back to the roots of what made CoD a massive success" and it turned out like this. The game certainly doesn't captivate the arcadey fun feeling of say MW2, and it actually reminds me more of something like Rainbow Six Siege, combined with Insurgency and a little bit of Battlefield. Which is far away from the expectations I had when purchasing a CoD game. At the end of the day, if you think you'd like such a combination of FPS's, then, by all means, buy this game and you'll probably have a blast. However, if you're actually looking for a CoD game then I suggest that you wait until the next one is released.    … Expand
  17. LeoGeo1989
    Jan 23, 2020
    2
    CAMPAIGN 9/10 BEST WEVE PROBABLY EVER HAD.
    MULTIPLAYER 0/10 WORST WE EVER HAD !
    SO MANY THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN INPLEMENTED IN MP MAKE NO SENSE AND HINDER/DESTROY THE ACTUAL GAMEPLAY. EVERYTHING FROM LOUD FEET AKA (SOUNDWHORING) TO CLAYMORES WITH ALMOST NO COUNTER, AND GIANT OVERSIZED MAPS WITH 1 MILLION LINES OF SIGHT TO BE SHOT FROM. AND OF COURSE SBMM. THIS IS EASILY THE WORST MP    CAMPAIGN 9/10 BEST WEVE PROBABLY EVER HAD.
    MULTIPLAYER 0/10 WORST WE EVER HAD !

    SO MANY THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN INPLEMENTED IN MP MAKE NO SENSE AND HINDER/DESTROY THE ACTUAL GAMEPLAY. EVERYTHING FROM LOUD FEET AKA (SOUNDWHORING) TO CLAYMORES WITH ALMOST NO COUNTER, AND GIANT OVERSIZED MAPS WITH 1 MILLION LINES OF SIGHT TO BE SHOT FROM. AND OF COURSE SBMM. THIS IS EASILY THE WORST MP EXPERIENCE YOU WILL EVER HAVE THINK OF COD GHOST ONLY 10XS WORSE !    … Expand
  18. WarkKnight
    Oct 27, 2019
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A lot of people are saying this is anti-Russian propaganda? Ignore that noise, this is an actual review. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is not a great game or a good game, it's an ok game with a lot of problematic issues that no AAA game in 2019 should have. I'll start by talking about the general gameplay "improvements." At first Modern Warfare's new lighting, animations, and sound effects give the indication that you are playing a new and revamped Call of Duty game, this is reinforced by the ability to use night vision, clammer, and peek through doors. However underneath these mostly useless mechanics and the deceiving facelifts it's still the same shooter as Black Ops 4 and Modern Warfare (2007) Remastered.

    In multiplayer this years entry still has all the same problems aim stutter, server input delays, spawn killing, run and gun spam, it's a gameplay loop that frankly has grown tired and it really is telling of Call of Duty's age. In multiplayer specifically, the larger maps don't remedy any of these issues in fact they create new ones like camping and increased likeliness afk teammates. The smaller maps are all uninspired and frankly it's weird we didn't get the greatest hits of all the old Modern Warfare maps.

    Now I'm going to talk about the campaign, it's just not very good. There's one mission in the middle of the game that slightly surprised me but the novelty of taking a break from shooting in one mission and guiding a civilian to a safe place wore off on me very quickly. Most of the other missions try to shock and grab the interest of the player by having you witness something shocking through the eyes of characters ranging from bystandards to terrorists, it's not shocking or very interesting. We've seen this pov of terrorists and their victims in video games and movies before and I fail to see how this does it in a new or provocative way. In other missions, the game will try to "surprise" you by taking a cue from the page of American Sniper, you'll occasionally have to shoot enemy combatants who happen to be children or women. I know some people have said that this is in poor taste or promotes violence against women, and I definitely disagree with that, but frankly, it doesn't add to or make the experience better. It's a frustrating moment that slows night sections of the game to a snail's pace, has very little with the overarching story, and frankly yeah hurting children will just make some people uncomfortable regardless of political affiliation. Real soldiers in my family have experienced this and I know that it's something they never wanted to see in the service. I assume some group of edgelords will find joy in these moments, they are the scum of the Earth, that is what I have to say on that subject.

    Finally, I want to examine the story's use of Russian and Muslim fighters in the game. A lot of people are saying this game is Democratic propaganda because it portrays Russians as "evil" and supposedly sets back stereotypes of Russians many years while at the same time portraying Muslims in too positive of a light and rewriting history. This is blatantly false. The Call of Duty games have always sided with the US in their FICTIONAL portrayals of conflicts with Russia, it seems people have forgotten this in recent years because the threats of the last three Call of Duty games were futuristic ethnically diverse private armies. With Russia becoming a more prominent threat to the security of the US and the United Nations IRL in the past few years it makes sense that Russia was chosen as the villain in this Call of Duty game. Does it have the twists and turns of the original trilogy? No. Is it as well done? No. It's doing its own thing for better or for worse. I don't know why pro-Russia groups in the US and Russia suddenly think this game should appeal to them, it never has and never will, Call of Duty has and always will have a pro-US narrative. Regardless of how I feel about people trying to insert their weird pro-Russia politics into the discussion surrounding this game, I think this is just a passable uninspired Call od Duty campaign that relies on shock value and Captain Price nostalgia. It's no good.

    The gameplay here is as solid (and outdated) as it was 10 years ago, and the rest is a mediocre cookie-cutter shooter that's only claim-to-fame is being in a series that is way past due for retirement; and strangely this year, in particular, having a very vocal pro-Russian national group try and hijack the dialogue to manipulate modern-American conservatives. I find this ironic because my conservative friends have been hyping this game for it's unapologetic and gruesome nature. It goes to show that when you try to shove your political identity into art like this you just create a confusing mess of controversy that was frankly never necessary, and only serves to generate more interest and profits for Activision Blizzard.    … Expand
  19. Rabbitslayar
    Nov 15, 2019
    2
    Campaign is decent but the multiplayer is just a trash dumpster fire. Did they have to try and reinvent the wheel for this game. How could the multiplayer be so broken. This is what the Infinity Ward makers do, how did they screw this up.
  20. agni939
    Oct 25, 2019
    2
    The multiplayer maps are all god awful camp fests. Too many angles and dark corners you will never know where you got shot from until you are already dead. The single player has been (((diversified))) featuring black and brown SAS troops as well as a black female general. Spec ops is fun but very hard with randoms. Its the only good thing about this game.
  21. Dahmersnack
    Oct 30, 2019
    2
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Netcode is garbage. This is the most unreliable game I've played in a decade. DO NOT BUY!!! DO NOT PURCHASE! Believe me this is a huge pile… Expand
  22. CrownFucnRoyal
    Oct 31, 2019
    2
    For a AAA title this game is broken at absolutely every level. The game was made 100% with campers in mind while trying to call it "Tactical Gameplay"
    Infinite claymores with no emps or perks to get through them
    The Challenges are all broken at some point in their line. Voice chat shows my name as people from previous lobbies when i talk. Foot steps sound like a dang elephant. Forces    For a AAA title this game is broken at absolutely every level. The game was made 100% with campers in mind while trying to call it "Tactical Gameplay"
    Infinite claymores with no emps or perks to get through them
    The Challenges are all broken at some point in their line.
    Voice chat shows my name as people from previous lobbies when i talk.
    Foot steps sound like a dang elephant.
    Forces you into a new lobby every game. Can't make friends to play with like this.
    Dead silence barely works.
    Pistols are too weak on HC.
    Friends list is completely broken saying people are online/offline when they are not.
    Coop mode you cant use score streaks after you die once.
    Cyber Attack allies bodies disappear making it impossible to find the res point in HC
    This is a AAA game that acts like an early access steam indie game....

    From the reviews the companys have given this game they seem to have been bought out for reviews or have not ever even played the game.    … Expand
  23. Slavicbeets
    Oct 31, 2019
    2
    Wow, another anti Russian game from call of duty.... Maybe choose a new bad guy? Its story is supposedly "grey" which means there is no right or wrong when it comes to morals, but oh my what a lie that is... It's portrayal of Russian soliders is disgusting.... Remember these are soliders no different from Canadian or American, they are soliders fighting for their country and againstWow, another anti Russian game from call of duty.... Maybe choose a new bad guy? Its story is supposedly "grey" which means there is no right or wrong when it comes to morals, but oh my what a lie that is... It's portrayal of Russian soliders is disgusting.... Remember these are soliders no different from Canadian or American, they are soliders fighting for their country and against terrorism to make the world a better place, real people, and they are treated like garbage because of politics? Imagine of they portrayed black or Asians like this? Even Aboriginals? It would be taken off the shelves... Russia is not evil, they depict it as if all Russians support Putin, like saying all Americans support Trump or Obama, and all Canadian support Trudeau... Silly. Were. It all evil, my great uncles and grandfather's died fighting the Nazis, now we become the Nazis huh? And don't give me foolishness of "it's just a game, it's all fiction" there are literally parts thatimic real life events. The highway mission? Yeah that was a real even that was actually an American mission that left hundreds of Iraqis dead. But let's make it Russia's fault.lets give these people the impression that Russia is commiting these atrocities. There is a mission when a Russian soliders is beating little kids, if this was American solider, you would understand, you would be insulted, please look at this from our perspective. Start depicting them as a force against terrorism, not terrorist themselves...I'll definitely be sticking with the outer world's this month...… Expand
  24. WIDEBim
    Oct 31, 2019
    2
    The multiplayer sucks. You can’t do anything if you’re spawn trapped. When you die you spawn all the way in the back of the map which isn’t helpful because these are the worst maps I have ever played on in my life. And that’s including all games.
  25. skeetermcgee
    Nov 2, 2019
    2
    I am not a Russian bot (or even a Russian person) like most of these reviewers. Allegations that Russia is ‘depicted as pure evil’ is nonsense, as the Russian gov’t is represented by Kamarov and he is a good guy in the story (or, at least no worse than the rest of the CIA).

    The game gets one point for the campaign. The acting is mostly good, especially Price. It pushes nostalgia    I am not a Russian bot (or even a Russian person) like most of these reviewers. Allegations that Russia is ‘depicted as pure evil’ is nonsense, as the Russian gov’t is represented by Kamarov and he is a good guy in the story (or, at least no worse than the rest of the CIA).

    The game gets one point for the campaign. The acting is mostly good, especially Price. It pushes nostalgia buttons. It makes me yearn for the first time that the name ‘Makarov’ is mentioned, likely coming in the next game. However, the campaign represents 1% of gameplay by time for most buyers.
    The second point is because it is technically sound (at least on PC, I know XBONE players have had trouble). Regardless, the game looks great, sounds great, and the gun handling is as good as ever. The motion cap is excellent (because they used people who actually know how to handle firearms) as is the attention to detail in Gunsmith (though I wish that they licensed items that are depicted like Magpul, Aimpoint, EOTech, Accuracy Int’l, Sig, Glock, etc.)

    Spec Ops is a joke. It’s an afterthought that is comprised solely of recycled assets from a BR mode that is either on hold or cancelled after Activision realized that BR is dying and that this game can’t be just another BR COD.

    The multiplayer, which is the meat of why most buy COD, is simply the worst I have played since COD Ghosts. IW stated that they wanted to allow “less skilled” players to be able to better compete. In effect, what they did is create a game where anyone who tries to move around even cautiously is punished severely.
    - M-4/725 meta: This is likely just a launch problem, but these guns are basically the only viable weapons at the moment. With such a short TTK, you simply cannot compete with people who are using these guns if you are using something even slightly inferior. The idea of going into a game with an inferior loadout to just “have fun” or “try stuff out” is not an option except for the best players in the game.
    - Footsteps are the loudest I have ever heard in a game. In a way, they are a technical marvel, because I feel like I can see through walls with my ears. It’s uncanny at times. But this means that even crouch walking around results in you being soundwhored by people who are camped and hardscoping the door you’re about to come through. Because of this, Ghost is a required perk in slot 2, because you simply cannot afford to show up on UAV while you’re camping.
    - Netcode often results in single-frame deaths or the perception that you were killed by someone you couldn’t see yet.
    - The spawns are astoundingly resistant to flipping, even in Domination when a team holds a triple cap. This means that Domination usually results in a spawn trap within the first 50 points of a game, with no opportunity for comebacks by most teams. Maps such as Piccadilly and Euphrates are especially susceptible to this.
    All of these issues can and likely will be fixed or at least adjusted in future patches. There are two problems that I believe are fundamentally wrong with the game that will not ever be fixed:
    - The maps are designed for Window Warfare. The massive array of angles and verticality again means that anyone who tries to run and gun will always be cut down by those who are camping windows even after the footstep volume and camping issues are solved. The existing maps will NEVER be changed, and the first one or two drops of DLC maps are probably already beyond the point of no return in development at this point. Domination is especially hurt by this design. I have never played a COD game where B will often stay uncapped for the first 3+ minutes of a game. It’s because players post up and hardscope the flag, waiting to rip the face off the first poor bastard to even think of wandering near it.
    - The largely unacknowledged Skill Based Matchmaking means that you have to sweat hard to play the game. You cannot play casually. Because of this, you must use the meta guns all the time because you cannot afford to give up any advantage to the players you are matched against. Always competing exactly at your skill level sounds good on paper, but it makes the game extremely fatiguing to play since you can never just sit back and relax. In a number of other shooting games, my friends and I will easily play for 5-6+ hours at a time, but we find this game so fatiguing and unfun to play that we rarely play for more than an hour or so before we want to take a break or lose interest altogether. Even when we win, we still feel that the game simply isn’t fun to play most of the time.
    I’ll follow the development for a few months to see how aggressively IW will correct these problems. It seems highly likely that old fan favorite maps from previous MW games are coming as DLC, and they will further scratch the nostalgia itch. But I will 100% not play this game in 2020 if the meta isn’t adjusted to make all play styles viable.    … Expand
  26. Enragedflea
    Jan 3, 2020
    2
    Campaign is amazing, one of the best I have played for a cod game.

    Multiplayer is a mess and the Devs should be **** ashamed to release this like of crap. Want something that looks cool, gotta pay more money. Camera angles are broken as hell. Hit detection does not work you shoot first shore more hits and die anyway. Spec ops is just lazy and again a broken **** mess.

    0/10
  27. Torch294
    Sep 9, 2020
    2
    Least enjoyable multiplayer of all time. Campaign was good though. Missed opportunity.
  28. gamer_bunny
    Sep 7, 2021
    2
    Great graphics but, mediocre campaign, the levels are boring and very generic. Please no more politics and agendas in video games.
  29. Zeij
    Oct 27, 2019
    1
    When I pre-ordered Ghosts in 2013, it was a very big disappointment. I played it for no more than 10 hours. When Infinite Warfare came out in 2016, I was happy that I did not buy it, as it was another passing project. And now three years later, this game comes out which is so praised paid-criticism. Terrible level design in multiplayer, crazy story and plastic sounds, all this put an endWhen I pre-ordered Ghosts in 2013, it was a very big disappointment. I played it for no more than 10 hours. When Infinite Warfare came out in 2016, I was happy that I did not buy it, as it was another passing project. And now three years later, this game comes out which is so praised paid-criticism. Terrible level design in multiplayer, crazy story and plastic sounds, all this put an end to the games from the Studio Infinity Ward. If they have not been able to release anything good in six years, then there is no point in waiting for new games from them.
    Treyarch 4ever!    … Expand
  30. StHouston
    Nov 3, 2019
    1
    This is baseness. This is mean. This devalues ​​our death.
    highway death it was your doing.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

41
#41 Best Xbox One Game of 2019
2
#2 Most Discussed Xbox One Game of 2019
36
#36 Most Shared Xbox One Game of 2019

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
80

Generally favorable reviews - based on 22 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 18 out of 22
  2. Mixed: 4 out of 22
  3. Negative: 0 out of 22
  1. Pure Xbox
    Mar 18, 2020
    80
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare serves up the freshest take on a stale formula in years, with a new engine and revitalised multiplayer mode that takes full advantage of a finely-tuned weapon customisation system and some welcome changes to ballistic mechanics. While Spec Ops fails to deliver much long-term attraction, the story mode proves there’s plenty of justification for a narrative element in a modern shooter. Free maps and updates bring everyone onto the same page in multiplayer, but Infinity Ward's take on the battle pass template still needs some work.
    Read full review
  2. Cultured Vultures
    Dec 6, 2019
    70
    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is a mixed bag. A fantastic returning campaign, some decent multiplayer and terrible co-op makes MW an interesting entry.
    Read full review
  3. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    Nov 18, 2019
    70
    If you don’t mind being killed by the odd nuke – how anyone can score 30 consecutive kills is beyond our tiny minds – PvP could swallow your damn life. Pair it with a gutsy (if insensitive) campaign, and this tonally conflicted series continues to stay relevant thanks to the best guns in the biz. [Issue#184, p.68]
See all critic reviews »