- Publisher: Activision
- Release Date: Mar 19, 2013
- Also On: PC, PlayStation 3, Wii U
User Score
Generally unfavorable reviews- based on 417 Ratings
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 98 out of 417
-
Mixed: 65 out of 417
-
Negative: 254 out of 417
Buy Now
Review this game
-
-
Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.
-
-
Submit
-
Check Spelling
- User score
- By date
- Most helpful
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013I personally enjoyed the stealth aspects of the game as well as the health system. While the game could use a little work, I think it was a good game overall.
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013The game is terrible. Off the gate, the gameplay videos looked terrible. Booting up the game the UI is horrendous and really out dated. The game seems to have been outsourced to college students, but none of them did the work except that one kid that didnt want to get a F.
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013Very good game sound,zombie vibe and gameplay is amazing too bad that graphic isnt great but its decent overall this is very good game and it turns better if you like zombies in games
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 20, 2013
-
Mar 19, 2013This game blows massive chunks. Horrible plot and terrible graphics. I had hoped the game would've at least pleased me half as much as the Telltale game... So much for hope.
-
Mar 19, 2013I believe that for a $49.99 price, this is definitely worth it. It stays true to the story, and the game play is great. I highly recommend you buy this game.
-
Mar 19, 2013
-
Mar 19, 2013Almost as bad as The Walking Dead: The Game by Failtell Games. Graphics are subpar, story is meh, and the only redeeming quality is the game play which eventually feels kind of meh as well. Funny how people are saying all these things about this game that can also be directed at the Telltale Game failure. At least this has gameplay though.
-
Mar 19, 2013
-
Mar 19, 2013
-
Mar 19, 2013
-
Mar 19, 2013Terrible game. The developers fail to make a game that grasps the player in the least. The graphics are awful, the gameplay is even worse. Don't even get me started on the story, its full of cliches and cheesy lines. Stay away from this game. Obviously, all of the good user scores are made by the pathetic activision. I would not recommend this game to anyone even to the biggest fans of TWD world.
-
Mar 19, 2013
-
Mar 19, 2013
-
Mar 19, 2013This game is amazing. I have never played a game that made me actually feel like I was surviving the zombie apocalypse like this game does! Yes, the graphics are outdated but the gameplay delivers. Plus, its only 50 bucks so its not like they tried to make it appear to be some huge blockbuster...it is what it is and that is zombie apocalypse gameplay superior to any seen yet on consoles!
-
Mar 19, 2013This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
-
Mar 19, 2013I remember when a Dragon Age 2 developer hopped on here to shower praise on their half assed game. Seems alot like what's going on here. reviews that read like a promo cash in. So, show of hands...how many that scored it 10 are employed by Activision, AMC or Terminal Reality? Ya I figured.
Awards & Rankings
-
May 28, 2013With the success of Telltale Games’s arcade game, there were high hopes for this full-fledged retail title. As it happens you would be best off saving your pennies for the already announced sequel to the arcade title as Survival Instinct will leave you with bitter feelings towards The Walking Dead series. Unless you are an absolute nutter for anything to do with The Walking Dead, your money will be best spent elsewhere.
-
games(TM)May 20, 2013It's as if the developer simply ceased to care, or ran out of time, or both. Who knows? What we do know is that Terminal Velocity has crafted something truly loathsome and undeserving of its heritage. [Issue#135, p.108]
-
Games Master UKMay 9, 2013Archaic design spoils good ideas in this shoddy squandering of one of the hottest licenses going. [June 2013, p.74]