Super Contra

 Xbox 360
Metascore
61

Mixed or average reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 1 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 8 out of 10
  3. Negative: 1 out of 10
  1. TeamXbox
    74
    It’s extremely challenging and demanding, so those looking for a more casual shooter might be best served going for another game. Additionally, the lightweight “enhanced” graphics and audio don’t bring the game as far into the next-gen era as some XBLA titles have done.
  2. Official Xbox Magazine
    65
    Old-time arcaders will dig the ramped-up challenge: Super's tough even with a partner, and we had to lower the difficulty and hoard the spread gun - our sidearm soulmate - to beat all five levels solo. [Sept 2007, p.76]
    All this publication's reviews
  3. GameSpot
    65
    Super Contra's blistering level of difficulty makes it best suited for those looking for an exceptionally punishing arcade run-and-gun experience.
  5. GamesRadar+
    60
    With limited continues and a good level of challenge, this game definitely won’t be a cakewalk. Just don’t expect anything that spectacular, either.
  6. GameZone
    60
    Super Contra should only be downloaded by the most experience arcade players. Its difficulty will make the learning curve too high for novice players giving it a run-through for the first time.
  7. X-ONE Magazine UK
    60
    Insanely hard. [Issue#24, p.101]
    All this publication's reviews
  8. IGN
    57
    From ugly borders and out of place visual effects to choppy net code, it's clear that a lot more work could have gone into this title.
  9. Official Xbox Magazine UK
    50
    Another cheap money-spinner. [Nov 2007, p.107]
    All this publication's reviews

Awards & Rankings

82
#82 Most Shared Xbox 360 Game of 2007

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
6.4

Mixed or average reviews- based on 9 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 6 out of 9
  2. Mixed: 1 out of 9
  3. Negative: 2 out of 9
  1. B.K.
    Jul 31, 2007
    0
    This game is lost in the past. Outdated graphics and gameplay, mixed with the missing widescreen support. This game was pushed out for the This game is lost in the past. Outdated graphics and gameplay, mixed with the missing widescreen support. This game was pushed out for the sake of pushing it out, and no effort was made to make it the best game it could possibly be. Take pride in your creations.… Full Review »
  2. LasPlays
    Nov 6, 2017
    8
    La verdad que esta muy bien para aquella época, tengo que admitir que la jugabilidad esta maso menos pero aun así me gusta, un control fácil yLa verdad que esta muy bien para aquella época, tengo que admitir que la jugabilidad esta maso menos pero aun así me gusta, un control fácil y una dificultad mediana decente así que para mi es un 8.
    Tengo que admitir que yo no se ingles y solo lo jugué para ver como era y pasarla bien, así que por la historia y demás no se mucho pero para mi es un 8 sinceramente se lo merece, gran juego!    … Full Review »
  3. ICUH8N
    Dec 8, 2010
    0
    An absolute joke of a release and waste of money regardless the price. Shamelessly crapped out as a quick money grab during the XBLA's infancyAn absolute joke of a release and waste of money regardless the price. Shamelessly crapped out as a quick money grab during the XBLA's infancy this game does nothing to truly enhance or refine the original arcade release, such as including widescreen support, improve the graphics (the "enhanced" mode actually just makes things difficult to see), update the god-awful controls or provide any extended stages. There are a million things to nitpick, such as the delay when aiming, short range of fire during top-down stages and an inability to differentiate weapon drops, but I'd only be wasting my time. In short, if you're looking for great Contra action stick to the classic NES versions of Contra and Super C, Contra 3 Alien Wars on the SNES or the more recent Contra 4 on Nintendo DS and be sure to avoid this putrid XBLA arcade port at all costs.… Full Review »
See all user reviews »