- Critic score
- Publication
- By date
-
Feb 13, 2011Breach looks nice, but does not offer anything innovative except for the magnificent destruction. Everything does feel a bit clinical and adrenaline is nowhere to be found in the game. If you buy this game for 1200 Microsoft Points, you will be disappointed because it's just not worth it.
-
Jan 30, 2011A poorly thought out attempt to take on Call Of Duty and Battlefield, whose main gimmick is as a flawed as its other elements are overfamiliar.
-
Jan 29, 2011Does not hold a candle to heavyweights of the genre.
-
Jan 28, 2011That's pretty much Breach's biggest issue: Even if it's a cheaper XBLA alternative, everything it does has been done better elsewhere. If it had contributed something new to the FPS landscape, I'd forgive its attempt at imitation, but most folks interested in it already have immediate access to great games such as Halo, Black Ops and Battlefield.
-
Jan 27, 2011he game is definitely built to favor more methodical, communicative teams over groups of lone wolves. However, aside from diehard fans of the genre, it's difficult to imagine someone convincing enough of his friends to buy Breach to form a cohesive team.
-
Jan 26, 2011Whatever it ought to have been, it's not. It has a few new features, but nothing to separate it from the more popular, more polished games that cover exactly the same ground. It may be inexpensive, but the cost-to-value ratio is still too high.
-
Feb 10, 2011Breach is barely worth the effort, a plodding experience that sucks you dry of your time offering very little long term reward and a minuscule amount of instant gratification.
-
Feb 8, 2011It's difficult to understand how something like this, that seemed to be a good idea on paper, turned out to be so awful.
User score distribution:
-
Positive: 3 out of 11
-
Mixed: 2 out of 11
-
Negative: 6 out of 11
-
May 6, 2011
-
Dec 12, 2012
-
Mar 23, 2012