User Score
8.0

Generally favorable reviews- based on 17 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 12 out of 17
  2. Negative: 2 out of 17

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
  1. Sep 10, 2021
    4
    This is an empty game, mainly because of how the player interacts with the gameplay via an input device (gamepad/etc). A computer can easily compute the optimal path of the golf ball in this game to always score a birdie, even if pseudo-random numbers are involved. Instead of presenting relevant data in order for the player to use logic to determine an optimal strategy, the game feeds theThis is an empty game, mainly because of how the player interacts with the gameplay via an input device (gamepad/etc). A computer can easily compute the optimal path of the golf ball in this game to always score a birdie, even if pseudo-random numbers are involved. Instead of presenting relevant data in order for the player to use logic to determine an optimal strategy, the game feeds the gamer only a very limited amount of information. The highlights of competing players' gameplay feel artificial because of the simplicity of the underlying algorithms. Commentator dialogues contain a very limited set of sentences for the game engine to choose from, and the algorithm involves only a rudimentary form of artificial intelligence.

    Graphics and lighting are for the most part good - except for trees and vegetation which are composed of flat polygons and transparent textures. Movements of tree branches in the virtual wind are unrealistic. Stones have medium complexity.
    Expand

There are no critic reviews yet.