Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3

 PlayStation
Metascore
87

Generally favorable reviews - based on 10 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 8 out of 10
  2. Mixed: 2 out of 10
  3. Negative: 0 out of 10
Buy Now
Buy on
  1. Electronic Gaming Monthly
    70
    Seems like the PS2 version’s forgotten kid brother. Its graphics, plagued with texture warping and pop-ups, are bad even by PS1 standards. [Dec 2001, p.264]
    All this publication's reviews
  2. TotalGames.net
    63
    Fundamentally it’s the same game as "Tony Hawk’s 2," only it chugs along like a broken steam train! It stutters, splutters and jerks around like a breakdancer with broken legs and it feels like the batteries are running low on your PlayStation.

Awards & Rankings

4
#4 Best PS1 Game of 2001
9
#9 Most Discussed PS1 Game of 2001

User Reviews

All reviews »
User Score
7.9

Generally favorable reviews- based on 67 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 44 out of 67
  2. Mixed: 18 out of 67
  3. Negative: 5 out of 67
  1. GameMan2005
    Aug 22, 2023
    10
    One of my all time favorite games. Tony Hawk is such a legend and my role model.
  2. AOTfan123
    Jan 10, 2015
    7
    It's a good port if you didn't have a PS2, Gamecube, or XBOX back in the day. the graphics are fair and the levels looks identical to theIt's a good port if you didn't have a PS2, Gamecube, or XBOX back in the day. the graphics are fair and the levels looks identical to the other ports but they did have to make it look a little different along with the soundtrack which some songs are missing. I prefer The PS2 version because it has way better graphics and online play.… Full Review »
  3. Watermelon789
    Jul 14, 2011
    9
    Addictive and very fun, a lot of varied tricks and customizable stuff. The soundtrack is badass and awesome, One of the last games andAddictive and very fun, a lot of varied tricks and customizable stuff. The soundtrack is badass and awesome, One of the last games and probably great for the PS.… Full Review »
See all user reviews »