Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PlayStation 4
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1157 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 737 out of 1157
  2. Mixed: 224 out of 1157
  3. Negative: 196 out of 1157
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. Noxbits
    Jan 4, 2020
    7
    The game does quite well it's proposal, but it should have more - interesting- game modes
  2. steco2000
    Jul 7, 2020
    7
    One of the most innovative shooters in the history of video games. Very fun and well studied gameplay, with a wide choice of operators with differentiated skills that make the games dynamic and unpredictable. Unfortunately, the game is plagued by a huge number of bugs and glitches, obscene servers and one of the worst communities ever seen. All this, unfortunately, profoundly ruins theOne of the most innovative shooters in the history of video games. Very fun and well studied gameplay, with a wide choice of operators with differentiated skills that make the games dynamic and unpredictable. Unfortunately, the game is plagued by a huge number of bugs and glitches, obscene servers and one of the worst communities ever seen. All this, unfortunately, profoundly ruins the experience of a game that could have become a true masterpiece of the world of shooters.… Expand
  3. amirhosine
    Nov 5, 2020
    7
    I like this game but ubisoft don't care about game . This game have very cheater in pc and very DDoser in console .
  4. jkuras08223
    May 24, 2021
    7
    Rainbow is one of the best tactical online shooters. But what is holding back is the lack of content every season. They dont add any new maps which makes the first 2 weeks of the season fun then I wont play it for the next 3 months. The ranked game mode is really fun and competitive but it has its flaws with high ranked players purposely loosing there games to play bad players. They shouldRainbow is one of the best tactical online shooters. But what is holding back is the lack of content every season. They dont add any new maps which makes the first 2 weeks of the season fun then I wont play it for the next 3 months. The ranked game mode is really fun and competitive but it has its flaws with high ranked players purposely loosing there games to play bad players. They should add the ability to make comunity made tournaments for all ranked levels to freshen up the game a bit. But overall a good game.… Expand
  5. jakesporea
    Sep 2, 2021
    7
    fun game but i like fortnite moreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  6. indiesuckup
    Dec 31, 2021
    7
    Note: This review will only cover multiplayer content.

    If you're looking for a break from the run of the mill fast paced first person shooter this is the game for you. It combines a wide array of operators with unique abilities and weapons with tactical gameplay which rewards good positioning, gadget use and game sense. The game has plenty of unique mechanics including one-shot headshots,    Note: This review will only cover multiplayer content.

    If you're looking for a break from the run of the mill fast paced first person shooter this is the game for you. It combines a wide array of operators with unique abilities and weapons with tactical gameplay which rewards good positioning, gadget use and game sense. The game has plenty of unique mechanics including one-shot headshots, the lack of a jump button and incredibly destructible environments but the one that makes the game different from its competitors are the drones and cameras. It allows players that are dead to contribute by pinging enemies or making callouts. The base gameplay is well thought out and surprisingly deep. Every match can play out in millions of different ways. However this game has what I like to call an "Overwatch problem" where players are forced into playing a certain way in order to win, some operators are incredibly powerful like ash, ace, jäger or mute and others are incredibly situational or next to useless like glaz, nökk, warden or wamai. Some objective sites are very easy to defend, and others are almost impossible. Ubisoft also seems to have no idea how to use there time because despite some maps being in desperate need of a rework (Theme Park, Kanal and Skyscraper) they decide to rework outback, one if the better maps in the game. If this concept was in the hands of a more competent game studio it could be one of the best shooters of all time, but instead we have to deal with Ubisoft fumbling yet another golden opportunity.    … Expand
  7. dankmeow
    Mar 16, 2022
    7
    There is fun to be had but the monetization of the content within the game is quite heavy.
  8. DavideMoro
    Apr 19, 2022
    7
    Another Ubisoft title, by Tom Clancy's.
    Seasonal updates have allowed it to last a long time and maintain a solid player base. The graphics are not the most modern, although the said updates have allowed for some rejuvenating tweaks. The controls and mechanics work, allowing ample mobility, which is also quite intuitive. The story, being a game based on online multiplayer, is absent, but    Another Ubisoft title, by Tom Clancy's.
    Seasonal updates have allowed it to last a long time and maintain a solid player base. The graphics are not the most modern, although the said updates have allowed for some rejuvenating tweaks. The controls and mechanics work, allowing ample mobility, which is also quite intuitive. The story, being a game based on online multiplayer, is absent, but that's okay. The defect of all games of this genre is and remains habit. Abandoning it for a few months, or a year, could blow the player away once he takes it back. The various non-competitive modes help to a certain extent in this.
    However, it remains one of the most successful and popular Tom Clancy's chapters, also for the scalability of levels and, above all, for personal skill, which remains the best way to get some satisfaction with this Ubisoft title.
    The grade would be 7.5 / 10. Given the absence of a history and the advancing age, I decided to round it down.    … Expand
  9. ArekSuzme
    Oct 2, 2022
    7
    Great fps game ruined by it's **** community. It's a love and hate relationship.
  10. Tomplexthis
    Jul 8, 2022
    7
    Dont know, dont care, but this games gunplay is the top of the line. it feels solid.
    i loved this game, its a grind to get a new character, but it is doable
    It is a really fun, tactical game. but. people suck
    They shoot you in the back, on your own team
    They fight, scream, argue, then kick you.
    Play with friends, or not at all. Get Good...
  11. Agt_Killionaire
    Oct 7, 2022
    7
    Siege is a stressful game to get into. Initially I was brought into the game because of the one shot headshot mechanic but once I reached level 100 I drifted away from that. About 33% of your time you will more than likely be dead or waiting for the drone phase to finish. In my opinion there is too much down time but there is always Call of Duty with little to no down time.
  12. GAME-OVERcv
    Nov 1, 2022
    7
    a broken but fun game, one of the best tactical multiplayer shooters ive played
  13. glypheye
    Jan 20, 2016
    6
    6/10 for me. Here's the thing. Without question, the game is challenging. The tactical considerations for each scenario are extensive. The issue is that the complexities of the situation play out in a sterile, claustrophobic atmosphere (especially if you're defending) that makes for tension, sure, but without any inherent fun involved. And, without the fun, there's not much incentive6/10 for me. Here's the thing. Without question, the game is challenging. The tactical considerations for each scenario are extensive. The issue is that the complexities of the situation play out in a sterile, claustrophobic atmosphere (especially if you're defending) that makes for tension, sure, but without any inherent fun involved. And, without the fun, there's not much incentive to grind through the learning curve to become proficient in the game, from where I'm standing. Graphically, it's ok...the gunplay/feel seems pretty solid while the character modeling is kind of dated...but really, that's only an issue when watching your team-mates run towards the structure while attacking. Once in perpetual crouch mode while inching stealthily around the map, this kind of thing hardly matters. Destruction, as advertised, is everything...which plays into the whole tactical complexity schtick. It seems like enemies can make holes almost everywhere, so "cover" is misleading almost all the time. You can't mark, beyond scout missions at the beginning with the little drones, so if you see something that looks like a human appendage, you'd best laden it with bullets. And if you hear definitive sounds of human mucking about just beyond a said destructable wall, let er rip in that direction as well. Sound is uber-amplified almost to the point of absurdity, in this game....obviously meant to be an important thing to pay attention to for aforementioned reasons.

    Anyways, I"m sure this kind of game appeals to the rabid tactical shooter fanatics but, for me, enjoyment overall is lacking, squelched by the crushing emphasis on all things tactical.

    Anyways    … Expand
  14. DemonicSoul
    Dec 28, 2015
    6
    Story: There really is no single-player component of this game, unfortunately. All you get are tiny challenges known as "Situations" that take place on all 10 MP maps and a little bit of story after you complete the last one. So don't come here expecting any compelling story to the game.

    Gameplay/Multiplayer: To get the other 2 modes over with: "Situations" is throwaway, and "Terrorist    Story: There really is no single-player component of this game, unfortunately. All you get are tiny challenges known as "Situations" that take place on all 10 MP maps and a little bit of story after you complete the last one. So don't come here expecting any compelling story to the game.

    Gameplay/Multiplayer: To get the other 2 modes over with: "Situations" is throwaway, and "Terrorist Hunt" (co-op mode) could be better if it didn't recycle MP maps, have stupid AI, and DIDN'T run on 30fps. Anyways, the real meat of the game is in its MP component where it's 5 v 5 on several maps with no respawns, and with 1 team pitched to defend a certain objective while another team attacks. And while the MP had so much potential to be a strong e-sports game, the MP disappoints with some balance issues and horribly casual-ized shooting. With the game, their mode design is based on classic e-sports modes (5 v 5, no respawns, etc.) with attack/defend modes. With each side, you'll be treated to a healthy amount of "operators" - characters with special gadgets from 5 elite CTUs (US, UK, RU, GER, and FR) and most of them are fun to use, have quality weapons/gadgets, and some are balanced well - keyword is some. Unfortunately, some Operators - like "IQ," "Tachanka," or "Pulse" are underpowered when compared to their peers; some - like "Thermite" or "Mute" - are almost essential if you want to succeed on either side; and the 3 Riot Shield Operators on the Attacking side are incredibly annoying to deal with and disrupt the flow of the game. 99% of your engagements will be in close-quarter hallways, so having a shield come in and harass you with pistol rounds is annoying even if they only hipfire. It also doesn't help that, for a "tactical" shooter, there's 1-hit kill melee. Way to give more power to the shields. When it comes to modes, there's only 3 (you decide whether that's good or bad): one acting as Search and Destroy from CoD, one where you must either rescue or defend a hostage, or one where you must either defend or secure a specific room full of chemical weapons; each one plays out almost identically. At the beginning of every round in a game, a "Preparation Phase" begins where for about 45 seconds, the defending team gets to set-up and fortify the room containing the objective and the attacking team uses small drones to locate the objective and identify enemies. This phase is great as it allows for planning to occur before the "Action Phase" even begins since the attackers have to work together to find the objective and identify what kind of Operators they're up against while the defenders have decide which walls to reinforce, which doors to barricade, etc. Even after the Preparation Phase ends, the first minute of the round is also tense since attackers have to be cautious about entering the building and watch for cameras and other gadgets getting in their way while defenders have to be on the alert for where the enemy is engaging from using sound, cameras, or other means to locate the attackers. Everything is all well and good....until the **** hits the fan and the guns start shooting. The biggest sin this game can ever accomplish with being a serious and "tactical" shooter is having some of the EASIEST recoil in any FPS. You could also lower the recoil further by putting certain attachments on a gun. When you get into a gunfight with someone - especially if they're a defender and have chosen a good spot to camp (not using the term negatively here) in, the game turns into CoD with how easy the recoil is the maintain and usually, whoever has the better camping spot will win most of the time. Part of this reason is the 1-shot headshot rule which DOESN'T belong in this game due to the casual shooting. Most of the time I die from a headshot is because the guy sprayed me down and got a lucky hit instead of having to be a skilled shooter and compensate for any recoil. This leads to continued frustration after experiencing several insta-deaths since those shooters hardly earned their headshot kill. The game also suffers from repetition because of its lack of variety in modes. In the end, I'd like the MP more, but repetition, balance issues, and casual recoil pretty much tainted my experience. 5/10

    Graphics: While not photo-realistic, the visuals are still good with texture quality and models. Besides the overly obnoxious lighting when peeking in or out of windows, the visuals are fine. 7/10

    Sound: The game's strongest quality. Everything from footsteps, the gunshots, to explosions all sound incredible. Only thing missing is a score. 9/10

    Verdict: R6:S could have been the next big FPS with its excellent sound and tactical planning element - but it stumbles due to casual shooting, wasted game modes, and several other flaws already covered. For a recommendation: rent or pick it up at a price drop on the PC - especially if you want a 60fps+ experience on ALL game modes.

    Rating: 6/10    … Expand
  15. Trepadora
    Jan 4, 2017
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is actually a surprisingly good game. It's a thankfully breath of fresh air amidst the run-n-gun regenerating fair that FPS' usually get. It's just a shame that everything that surrounds the game is so **** bad.

    I can't praise enough about the gameplay. The emphasis on tactics and teamwork makes for a very tense and exciting shooter. If I could just play the game like    Rainbow Six Siege is actually a surprisingly good game. It's a thankfully breath of fresh air amidst the run-n-gun regenerating fair that FPS' usually get. It's just a shame that everything that surrounds the game is so **** bad.

    I can't praise enough about the gameplay. The emphasis on tactics and teamwork makes for a very tense and exciting shooter. If I could just play the game like I wanted this would be an 8 or 9 out of 10 straight away. Unfortunately, Ubisoft is pretty good at stopping that.

    The different operators are pretty well balanced. Everyone has their own niche and can be useful in their own right. One can shoot clusters of bombs into a particular room through a breakable surface, and another can set up additional cameras to spot enemies from. There are a decent amount of operators in the base game, however a significant amount are locked behind season passes. Yes, plural. It's not the most gregarious example in gaming, but after being spoiled by the likes of overwatch, it's hard not to raise an eyebrow.

    A major issue however, is the servers. It's not infrequent to be kicked from squads, games and experience large spikes in lag during gameplay. For a game in which a fraction of a second can mean the difference been victory and defeat, it's a very concerning issue.

    Another problem is the players. If you don't go in with a squad full of friends, you're very likely to find yourself on the receiving end of a painful situation. Team killing is extremely frequent, and more often than not completely on purpose. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be very heavily punished other than a slight docking of points. It's not unusual to find the defending team a man down before the attackers have moved an inch.

    Speaking of which, quitting is also very frequent. The matchmaking doesn't always find replacements, often meaning you'll find yourself in a match where you are missing teammates and at a significant disadvantage. Even just one missing teammate can make a match impossible to win. Terrorist hunt is almost unplayable for this reason, as by the one minute mark you'll frequently find yourself with only two players on your team. That's ignoring the pretty severe issues this game has with AI.

    Finally, bugs plague this game, even to this date. In my short time playing, I found numerous glitches such as your gun turning invisible, or getting stuck at 0 bullets in your clip and being unable to reload or do anything but move despite having ammo.

    In summary, Rainbow Six Siege is a very good game. Unfortunately, it seems Ubisoft royally screwed the pooch on this one and packaged it very incompetently.    … Expand
  16. damman
    Dec 15, 2015
    6
    Graphics are up to par with the PS3. Good luck getting team killed by stupid team mates. I rented this game from Redbox and return it fast. I purchased Mad Max instead for cheap on Ebay.
  17. hkpan4
    Dec 1, 2015
    6
    This is a very good and the most realistic shooter on PS4, most map design is so detailed that allows umlimited possibilities. Guns handle and sound awesome, each match feel so intense even the gameplay is not fast like call of duty I personally think it is way more exciting and I prefer this type of tactical shooter. If you have friends who play with you coop this is one of the bestThis is a very good and the most realistic shooter on PS4, most map design is so detailed that allows umlimited possibilities. Guns handle and sound awesome, each match feel so intense even the gameplay is not fast like call of duty I personally think it is way more exciting and I prefer this type of tactical shooter. If you have friends who play with you coop this is one of the best experience you will get, the setting of counter terrorism is just Cool!
    It is very disappointing though it has some unnecessary flaws, without a singleplayer campaign it feels it is lacking a lot of contents and Ubisoft had been lazy.. I played Rainbow Six Raven Shield back then it had an awesome campaign each mission had detailed background and briefings, even 12 years ago had AI teamates to play with you singleplayer. The most IMPORTANT issue is that the Terrorist Hunt mode (which I only cares about as I don't enjoy multiplayer) drops to 30 Frames per second on PS4. I expected a 60 Frame smooth movement as advertised, I wonder why they couldn't make it into 60frames in such a small map.. Even Battlefield could handle 60 frames in 64 player matches. Apart from this me and my mate had problem choosing maps, we thought we can't choose maps in matchmaking. There is actually a hidden setting in options you could turn off what maps you don't want to play, they should have made it more obvious..
    Overall I really love this style of game, in recent years FPS had been all about sci-fi and I am glad to see a realistic shooter back out here, great game with lots of potential.    … Expand
  18. ramtinkamanian
    Jun 7, 2016
    6
    my biggest problem about this game is the lack of content i mean is it to much to ask for a campain in a fps and if you dont have friends to play with in this game i will not recommend it
  19. albodoin
    Jan 13, 2018
    6
    This game is okay if you play with some friends but even then it can be frustrating when you fight against elite players. The graphics are fine and it's fun to destroy the environment by trying tactics. Honestly I would have liked something less "cartoony" because you feel less like an elite squad and more like fps DOTA and also the fact than everything is based onThis game is okay if you play with some friends but even then it can be frustrating when you fight against elite players. The graphics are fine and it's fun to destroy the environment by trying tactics. Honestly I would have liked something less "cartoony" because you feel less like an elite squad and more like fps DOTA and also the fact than everything is based on micro-transaction...can't you just release a full game other than pay to win crap?… Expand
  20. AgentVenom117
    Feb 21, 2016
    6
    Although it's lacking in content by having only 3 online modes and the only single player content are the equivalent to tutorials,it's the most realistic and intense FPS to date and I had a lot of fun blowing up walls and spraying bullets in the huge hole and getting a lucky kill or planting the defuser near the bomb and having a panicking team run into my teams trap and watch them getAlthough it's lacking in content by having only 3 online modes and the only single player content are the equivalent to tutorials,it's the most realistic and intense FPS to date and I had a lot of fun blowing up walls and spraying bullets in the huge hole and getting a lucky kill or planting the defuser near the bomb and having a panicking team run into my teams trap and watch them get massacred. Buy it on sale if you have some cash lying around.… Expand
  21. THATcreepyUncle
    Sep 7, 2016
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is a funny beast. The most enjoyable aspect of this game is the Team Kill. There is nothing more glorious than dropping a C4 on the armour bag as all your other team mates run to it, grossly unaware of the pain coming their way. Take the Team Kill away however and it would be a distinctly remedial and average squad shooter.

    R6 Siege is by no means a bad game it is just    Rainbow Six Siege is a funny beast. The most enjoyable aspect of this game is the Team Kill. There is nothing more glorious than dropping a C4 on the armour bag as all your other team mates run to it, grossly unaware of the pain coming their way. Take the Team Kill away however and it would be a distinctly remedial and average squad shooter.

    R6 Siege is by no means a bad game it is just a bit meh. Maybe under the influence of Columbian Marching Powder whilst getting a rusty trombone from your latest Tinder conquest (who is a bit nice looking but is probably a few Mmm Bops short of a Hanson), you may get the same enjoyment as you would from the superior Overwatch.

    In summary, if you are massive troll and just like winding up your friends can't fault it. Furthermore, it is a solid entry into this genre....but not the best....that is Overwatch.    … Expand
  22. carlgoza
    Oct 27, 2016
    6
    I really have fun with this game, I've spent several hours playing it. But the experience could be better if ubisoft would fix the F....ING bugs.....................................................................
  23. XxAlbertoBuzzxX
    Jun 2, 2020
    6
    Tom Clancy´s Rainbow Six Siege
    ..............................................................
  24. RK800
    Jun 13, 2019
    6
    Game is 8/10, but community of this game is retard. Kicking each other for nothing, team killing.
  25. The_GamingFan01
    Jun 19, 2020
    6
    A great game with Major flaws.

    Singleplayer: For Singleplayer, you have 10 situations which play like 2min missions with no plot but defuse that bomb, rescue hostage etc. All of these are meant to be tutorials, but way to hard to be completed with the sidegoals by new players. Theres also Terrorist hunt, which can be played solo, but not offline. Its more of a training mode with bots,    A great game with Major flaws.

    Singleplayer:
    For Singleplayer, you have 10 situations which play like 2min missions with no plot but defuse that bomb, rescue hostage etc. All of these are meant to be tutorials, but way to hard to be completed with the sidegoals by new players.
    Theres also Terrorist hunt, which can be played solo, but not offline. Its more of a training mode with bots, where you can try the diffrent multiplayer modes solo.
    The lack of a singleplayer hurts this game, seeing as all other R6 games had decent ones.

    Multiplayer: The main focus is multiplayer.
    You can play 4 modes, of these are 2 completly useless. The only viables are CASUAL and RANKED. Multiplayer plays smooth, although litered with DDOSers (Console) and Hackers (PC).

    Gameplay: No match is the same in R6S. Although that statement is true, it gets boring after awhile through the sheer toxicity and seriousness of games, even in CASUAL. Most of the time you get enemies which think they will be the next pro players, making this game not really fun. Toxic teammates, that kill you for every little thing dont help. You will get burned out fast.

    Bugs and gliches take long to be fixed, mostly 3 months, some even returning after they got "patched" Also the devs seem to only listen to the pro players, not the playerbase.

    Should you buy this game? If its on sale somewhere? Yes
    Otherwise no    … Expand
  26. Menni
    Apr 27, 2020
    6
    Tecnicamente e graficamente povero, con pochissime modalità di gioco, un downgrade impressionante dal video di presentazione in particolare riguardo la distruttibilità. Online con gli amici è un buon passatempo, per un paio d'ore
  27. CoolDave06
    Feb 28, 2020
    6
    Rainbow Six Siege is one of my favorite (not best) games i have played. It adds new things to the tactical shooter genre but all those things have already been said. Ubisoft are good developers only when they want to. For Rainbow Six they became total sell outs when it came to certain things. I respect so of their financial decisions like elite skins. I love the game play especially whenRainbow Six Siege is one of my favorite (not best) games i have played. It adds new things to the tactical shooter genre but all those things have already been said. Ubisoft are good developers only when they want to. For Rainbow Six they became total sell outs when it came to certain things. I respect so of their financial decisions like elite skins. I love the game play especially when it came to exclusive game modes like outbreak (which i loved). When their game wasn't selling well what do they decide to do, walk the 100 mile and GO ALL THE WAY TO BATTLE PASS. Now i understand the trend of riding waves but everyone who knows me knows that I despise fortnite with a burning passion, so when they decided to copy them like i was bow down and suck some multi-millionarie corporate cock i said otherwise. this made me delete this game in a burning rage. believe me, i love this game, I just hate fortnite more.… Expand
  28. Elite_Soldier
    Nov 21, 2020
    6
    An ok game, its pretty fun playing with your friends but the multiplayer at times feels lacklustre
  29. Axelle_1
    Sep 6, 2021
    6
    пару лет назад все было гараааааздо лучше....
  30. kc0321
    Mar 24, 2021
    6
    This is more expensive version of CSGO and its battle pass don't have 1 time spending feature.
  31. Snowy14
    Nov 24, 2021
    6
    This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Bon, je tiens à me présenter en tant que joueur et temps passer sur ce jeux pour que mon avis ai une certaines importance :
    PSEUDO : MrSnowy92
    Temps de jeu :+1000h
    RANK : Diamant
    Platform : PS4/PS5. Bien que je joue encore à R6, je ne retrouve plus la jouabilité d'avant. On dirait que les nouveaux propriétaires D'R6, n'en ont plus rien à faire de leur jeu, à part de l'argent (je n'y voit aucun inconvénients) Mais on peut facilement se rendre compte que au fur et à mesure que les mise à jour viennent le jeu se transforme en un jeu visant un nouveau public, (du genre des joueurs de fortnite venant sur R6) Donc le la commu devient plus toxic. Également que c'est mise à jours apportent en général rien d'exceptionnel (un perso par nouvel saison avec des armes recyclé) ce qui est franchement décevant.    … Expand
  32. Jollyolfun
    Mar 16, 2022
    6
    reallllyyyy not that great on ps4. it's pretty good on pc but still a little stinky.
  33. JOZZZUE
    Oct 28, 2022
    6
    Un excelente juego arruinado por una comunidad tóxica y un nulo emparejamiento , el modo clasificatoria está hasta sierto punto des-balanceado y las cuentas smurff arruinan mucho la experiencia de los nuevos jugadores.
  34. AnimeKing
    Dec 2, 2015
    5
    For $60 this game is totally not worth the money $40 yes, $50 maybe.

    Graphics, there nice looking but seem to be on par with ps3 graphics Sound, it's nice very nice I use the sound to my advantage all the time but in this game you have to use everything to your benefit. voice acting in cutscenes seem useless since the only time a CS happens is when you start the game, unlock an    For $60 this game is totally not worth the money $40 yes, $50 maybe.

    Graphics, there nice looking but seem to be on par with ps3 graphics

    Sound, it's nice very nice I use the sound to my advantage all the time but in this game you have to use everything to your benefit. voice acting in cutscenes seem useless since the only time a CS happens is when you start the game, unlock an operator, or when you do a Situation(which is the games tutorial).

    Gameplay, plays normal like any other FPS with WAY less customization on weapons. The game is a real challenge since you have only 1 life, you have a point system on health, and no way to heal your health. If you die you have on down to get revived but if you go down again you die. The guns are specific to the organization you choose and the weapons are specific to the person you choose. There is little customization on weapons, scopes, lasers, grip.
    You have 20 people to choose from but there split between 2 defenders and 2 attackers so you really only have a choice of 10 people. defenders defend there position in the building while the attackers infiltrate the building and that's the WHOLE **** GAME. Sure there's other mods like hostage, bomb, or the classic terrorist hunt but that's about it. Each operator has about 1-3 guns to choose from and 2 of the operators have nothing but a shield. The shield guys have piss poor shield aiming and if you want to sight aim you loose the effect of the shield. Mutiplayer is ok but it's just the same as terrorist hunt but with other players. This game got old real fast with the fact that you can unlock every operator and all the customization with the guns within a days time. from there you can do challenges but whats the point if you unlocked everything already.

    Controls, feel fine no big issue

    Balance, from what I could see each weapon is decent since it's all mostly CQC you always get the full damaging power of the gun so it's really just keeping the gun stable or getting that headshot's.

    Overall, it's not a bad game it really is fun but there's a lack of content and mods to play. it's all just 5v5, kill the other team or do the objective. it's like the Star wars Battlefront how it's got a lack of content.    … Expand
  35. LittleHastur
    Dec 4, 2015
    5
    This game is not what they've promised to us.
    Few contents and repetitive dynamics, absolutely few customizations and micro transaction everywhere.
    I remember that Payday was sold at a low price because it was on-line only and with few things to do while Siege has the same costs of Fallout 4 or other "complete" games. No campaign, no single player modes, no soul in this game. Just an    This game is not what they've promised to us.
    Few contents and repetitive dynamics, absolutely few customizations and micro transaction everywhere.
    I remember that Payday was sold at a low price because it was on-line only and with few things to do while Siege has the same costs of Fallout 4 or other "complete" games.
    No campaign, no single player modes, no soul in this game. Just an anonymous on-line shooter which is fun to play but that costs too much for what it offers.
    My advice: buy this game when is at a cheaper price or only if you have a good team of friends to play with....    … Expand
  36. ToxicGent
    Apr 28, 2018
    5
    Story? No. Great player base? also no. Reliable connection and fair matchmaking? no again. The game does have a good base but lacks any polish, absolutely filled with cringe and cheap shots. This isnt call of duty but it is not the great RSV2. Gets better if you play with friends.
  37. Ki-Rich51
    Jan 25, 2016
    5
    Поиграл в бету. Ну что тут сказать, да,, это тактический шутер, но матч за 5 мин и убийства с одной пули... Серьезно? Не знаю как вы, но я играю в игры ради наслаждения, а не ради того чтобы меня каждые пять минут задры убивали. 5 из 10 имхоПоиграл в бету. Ну что тут сказать, да,, это тактический шутер, но матч за 5 мин и убийства с одной пули... Серьезно? Не знаю как вы, но я играю в игры ради наслаждения, а не ради того чтобы меня каждые пять минут задры убивали. 5 из 10 имхо
  38. AtariGhost
    Feb 15, 2016
    5
    This could have been a great overall game like Rainbow 6 Vegas on PS3. The training situations are challenging and build excitement as to what’s to come in the single player campaign…but there isn’t one. Play online or play the situation again. Not everyone wants to go online. And if you do, you have to pay for it. After a long day at work, I just want to come home and play a single playerThis could have been a great overall game like Rainbow 6 Vegas on PS3. The training situations are challenging and build excitement as to what’s to come in the single player campaign…but there isn’t one. Play online or play the situation again. Not everyone wants to go online. And if you do, you have to pay for it. After a long day at work, I just want to come home and play a single player campaign. Also no multiplayer. Have friends over and play split screen? No. They need to buy their own copy, stay home, and get online. Big fun. Wise up developers. Not everyone wants to go online. Check eBay for my copy…cheap.… Expand
  39. Monsterrr
    Jun 20, 2018
    5
    This right here is a textbook example of a great game ruined by a terrible playerbase.
  40. chilabard
    Feb 29, 2016
    5
    I wish I could give this game a positive review. I am a huge Rainbow Six Vegas fan and Tom Clancy games in general. Considering this game at full price, giving it a positive review would be a lie.
    First, there is no campaign.
    Second, there are basically 3 modes--attack and defend, hostage extraction, and king of the hill. The objective for each one of these modes is always within a room    I wish I could give this game a positive review. I am a huge Rainbow Six Vegas fan and Tom Clancy games in general. Considering this game at full price, giving it a positive review would be a lie.
    First, there is no campaign.
    Second, there are basically 3 modes--attack and defend, hostage extraction, and king of the hill. The objective for each one of these modes is always within a room so there's not a whole lot of variety when planning an attack other than breaching in. The variety is limited by which operator you choose...
    Third, the customization that was in previous Rainbows is replaced by these operators. Personally, I like to create my own soldiers and enjoyed doing so on Rainbow Six Vegas and RSV2. Each operator comes with a few certain select guns and items, and you cannot customize the appearance of the operator.

    As far as gameplay goes, it feels like an average first person shooter once you actually find an enemy. It takes one bullet to the head to confirm a kill and you have to react quickly to survive. Spraying and praying can be just as effective here as in other popular FPS's. Since the objectives are located in a certain room of the map, defenders will camp and hide around the objective more times than not. Luckily, there are a several infiltrating operator abilities to help counter this camping. Attacking the defending team can be fun when the teamwork is there and you can avoid some of the overpowered defender abilities (Frost.)

    Matchmaking is awful and it takes sometimes several minutes to get into a ranked game.    … Expand
  41. SpookyPete71
    Feb 26, 2017
    5
    Rainbow 6 is a classic built on competition gameplay. New features are constantly coming out however this game is overshadowed by classic Ubisoft issues that the studio just doesn't seem to care about.

    Frequent server outages combined with plagues of bugs they grow after each update. Ubisoft is clueless and doesn't care about user experience. Ubisoft only cares about developing new    Rainbow 6 is a classic built on competition gameplay. New features are constantly coming out however this game is overshadowed by classic Ubisoft issues that the studio just doesn't seem to care about.

    Frequent server outages combined with plagues of bugs they grow after each update. Ubisoft is clueless and doesn't care about user experience. Ubisoft only cares about developing new characters and promotional material to generate sales not improving a half bake game.

    Ranked match making is awful and doesn't even come close to actually matching players based on skill. Unless you have a full group prepare to get destroyed each game against pre made teams against solo players 9/10 times.

    When will gamers wise up and stop buying titles like this?    … Expand
  42. ShadowWarriorL
    May 5, 2017
    5
    Hey there. I’m here to give anyone that’s willing to listen my opinion on a game I’ve been playing for quite some time—Rainbow 6 Siege. I’m just going to get right to the point:
    Siege might have been the best FPS I’ve ever played, but it ends up falling so flat that it hurts. It’s one of those games that most people classify as having potential—but just to waste it and not do what    Hey there. I’m here to give anyone that’s willing to listen my opinion on a game I’ve been playing for quite some time—Rainbow 6 Siege. I’m just going to get right to the point:
    Siege might have been the best FPS I’ve ever played, but it ends up falling so flat that it hurts. It’s one of those games that most people classify as having potential—but just to waste it and not do what could’ve been done several times better. I’m not saying that Siege has to meet every single one of my expectations, or that it needs to be what I want it to be—I’m trying to say that as a game in its genre it needs to cover some bases before even trying to be an FPS.
    I’m talking about net code, fixing the issue with peekers advantage, giving spawn protection to attackers for a few seconds to protect them from spawn camping, and lastly preventing players with more latency to benefit from said latency. These are things that have a DIRECT influence in the way people play the game. It affects how each round plays out, how encounters work, and how players approach the game. If you know that you will have an advantage over someone if you peek them first, you’re more than likely going to run in and go for a peek. If you know you can get one or two picks at the very start of the round, you’re more than likely going to take the risk and take out those key ops. If you see you’re connected to a server and you’re lagging a bit—and you have peekers advantage, you’re more than likely going to run in first.
    Most people take any advantage they can get. And are they to blame? No, I can’t say they are. I myself am guilty of peeking outside, spawn killing, and rushing in. If my team is down by one, or if we’re tied up, or if the other team is outperforming us by using these things to their advantage, why am I going to take it? I won’t.
    And here is where my problem with this game really comes in: it almost forces you to accommodate your play style to these factors. Most matches play out the same way now. The same repetitious outside peeking, excessive rushing, defenders not doing their job—which is defending the objective, etc. I feel like as a player, I’ve lost the advantage in being to choose the way I play the game. I feel constrained in my choices in play-style because everything I’ve tried doesn’t work. I don’t really like the way I have to play the game now, but because it works I do it. And that’s where the game becomes just about winning and that’s where the fun factor ends for me. I try my best to only play when my friends are online as well. When they aren’t, I stick to terrorist hunt. But when they are on, they ultimately suffer the same fate—and for the most part, share the same opinion.
    Lastly, I feel like the game puts too much of a focus on adding in new operators. It is clearly an important part of the game and helps to “shift the meta”, but the season passes and the constant weapon skin additions really just detracts from what I would consider other important content. And by content I mean fixing the stuff that I’ve mentioned earlier. I’m not about to claim that I know anything and everything about how to manage a game like Siege, but from my perspective I’d shift focus.
    In summation, the problem I have with this game currently is that it lacks the foundation it needs to support its wonderful concept. It focuses too much on other things—like weapon skins and other gear—when it should be directing its focus on what makes the game function. By allowing problems like peekers advantage, spawn killing, and using latency as an advantage, the game shoots itself in the foot. It limits the player’s choices regarding play-style tremendously, and instead of building on its concept—it stunts its growth. You can’t build a house without a solid foundation.
    (EDIT: This review is based primarily around the PC version of this game--so if there's any inconsistencies I apologize. I didn't notice that this was for PS4)    … Expand
  43. gabrielmazutti
    Jul 22, 2017
    5
    Ok,vamos começar minha review,pontos positivos:Ótimo estilo de jogo,gameplay razoavelmente simples,mapas bem desenvolvidos,personagens com habilidades super legais e unicas,Pontos negativos:Os servidores são péssimos,hitdetection e hit box muito inferiores a jogos grátis,os bugs são inumeros e a grande maioria atrapalha a gameplay de forma direta,o jogo tem muitos e muitos defeitos quaseOk,vamos começar minha review,pontos positivos:Ótimo estilo de jogo,gameplay razoavelmente simples,mapas bem desenvolvidos,personagens com habilidades super legais e unicas,Pontos negativos:Os servidores são péssimos,hitdetection e hit box muito inferiores a jogos grátis,os bugs são inumeros e a grande maioria atrapalha a gameplay de forma direta,o jogo tem muitos e muitos defeitos quase incontaveis,resumindo eu não recomendaria tom clancy's rainbow six siege para ninguém a menos que essa pessoa goste de passar raiva… Expand
  44. darthcooper
    Apr 8, 2019
    5
    The only thing realistic or tactical about this game is the toxic players who know when and how to piss everyone off. The game could be good if it wasn't for all the toxic players who team kill and make nasty comments. Most of these are brats and I have literally left games based on how other people are treated. Furthermore, the trophies don't work or pop and good luck with getting thatThe only thing realistic or tactical about this game is the toxic players who know when and how to piss everyone off. The game could be good if it wasn't for all the toxic players who team kill and make nasty comments. Most of these are brats and I have literally left games based on how other people are treated. Furthermore, the trophies don't work or pop and good luck with getting that patched or fixed because Ubisoft doesn't give a ****. Ubisoft's response to toxicity is "We are working on it". As for the Trophies absolutely no response. Finally, their microtransactions are way over the top and you don't get **** from them either. Basically, you spend $60 on a game that's Overpriced, Broken and for Trophy Hunters don't even bother trying.… Expand
  45. R3HAP3R
    Feb 3, 2019
    5
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  46. TheDatenshiMMA
    Dec 30, 2020
    5
    Had it for 8 bucks with a bunch of characters and what hit me first was... well the characters ! The game tryna be realist and take itself seriously but why there is some girls with pink hair using drones and can see through walls ? Woman cant make it to response team and when they do they bately interveine !why the game is still crashing in 2021 ?had a blast but my god those detail pissHad it for 8 bucks with a bunch of characters and what hit me first was... well the characters ! The game tryna be realist and take itself seriously but why there is some girls with pink hair using drones and can see through walls ? Woman cant make it to response team and when they do they bately interveine !why the game is still crashing in 2021 ?had a blast but my god those detail piss me off, had more crash than 1.04 Cyberpunk… Expand
  47. Ivan_Lovushkin
    Feb 6, 2020
    5
    Хуже этой игры в плане стрельбы нету ничего. Стрельба просто отвратительная. Как будто держишь деревянную дилду.
  48. delutopian
    Feb 22, 2020
    5
    Has a questionable hit registration system. You can land 5+ shots on the enemy and don’t kill them, but they can one-shot you absolutely randomly. Also has quite a lot of toxic players and just full-on idiots. Though visually the game is nice, and the gameplau is also good.
  49. Sopranzzz_
    Mar 24, 2020
    5
    I have mixed thoughts about this game: in one hand, is basically one of the thousands fps titles, on the other, is a unique experience of tactical close quarter battles. Let's be real here, back in 2016 this game was almost unplayable, due to the hundreds of bugs and glitches, maps and gamemodes unbalanced, overpowered operators, very bad optimization, and so on...
    But when i look at it    I have mixed thoughts about this game: in one hand, is basically one of the thousands fps titles, on the other, is a unique experience of tactical close quarter battles. Let's be real here, back in 2016 this game was almost unplayable, due to the hundreds of bugs and glitches, maps and gamemodes unbalanced, overpowered operators, very bad optimization, and so on...
    But when i look at it in 2020, it is a completely different game. Hats off to Ubisoft for transforming the pile of garbage that R6 was into a more enjoyable and balanced experience. Yep, Ubi has almost re-touched every single aspect of the game, from barricades to the defenders shields and more.
    However, despite the general experience of the game became decent, still this game doesn't stand out in a very good way, personally: microtransactions are everywhere, the game will force you to spend real money in order to keep up with all the new operators (which, by the way, have a ridicolous price); most of the new operators are not original at all, using the exact same abilities of others (such as Nook and Warden); also, there are not new maps anymore, the ones left in the game are getting rebalanced, which is a good thing, but they get stale after a while. The mini events are cool, but in order to get the skins of that event you have to (guess what) pay with real money.

    It's actually kinda sad that this game completely shifted away from the original idea of counter terrorism units: that's the thing that attracted me the most when i started playing it.
    Nowdays, Rainbow Six Siege is just copying what other games have already done in the past, following the trend of battle pass, mini seasonal events and useless skins. Sad.    … Expand
  50. INU4SH4
    Jun 25, 2020
    5
    To be fair, I think this game manages to be successful in some departments. The game promises a realistic, tense, and strategic FPS and is probably one of the best in the market at that, however it is riddled with issues.

    I haven't played this game in years and I lost my interest in FPS games a while ago. This was actually one of the last FPS titles I actually played for a while before    To be fair, I think this game manages to be successful in some departments. The game promises a realistic, tense, and strategic FPS and is probably one of the best in the market at that, however it is riddled with issues.

    I haven't played this game in years and I lost my interest in FPS games a while ago. This was actually one of the last FPS titles I actually played for a while before moving into other types of games. This game offers good things like the continued development of new operators through the years, allowing the player base to stick and improving mechanics/characters. The game also looks and sounds pretty good but it's filled with visual bugs who ruin the immersion.

    Now I'm gonna talk about my terrible experience with this game. The gameplay always moved too slow, all the characters seemed the same, the learning curve was too steep and the game was too punishing and heavily favors cheaters. The PvE modes were also pretty boring.

    Definitely not a bad FPS game, just an extremely inaccessible, boring, and repetitive one to me. But this was just my personal experience, you might like it if you give it the appropriate time.    … Expand
  51. Bonzey-60
    Jul 2, 2020
    5
    This game has big problem with Ubi servers.often headshots are not included
  52. Bidson
    Dec 11, 2020
    5
    Would be great but... And that BUT should be understood by the largest letters ever.
    **** community
    -indestructible riot shields -problems with servers - and once again indestructible riot shields. How is that even possible to be so dumb to make shield held by a man to be impossible to destroy by grenades, C4 or any weapon in the game that seems to be realistic and tactical? Game with    Would be great but... And that BUT should be understood by the largest letters ever.
    **** community
    -indestructible riot shields
    -problems with servers
    - and once again indestructible riot shields. How is that even possible to be so dumb to make shield held by a man to be impossible to destroy by grenades, C4 or any weapon in the game that seems to be realistic and tactical? Game with great potential wasted by stupid decisions.
    Edit: i forgot about players using XiM or Conus Plus, when you see someone killing you aiming and tilting sideways be sure he is using one of those, works even on Ps4 and devs dont give a single S.    … Expand
  53. SirWondra2001
    Aug 21, 2020
    5
    Very buggy game and it is very space taking game on your HDD. Almost 150 GB...

    If you do not play for full game you will have disadvatage with low agent pool. But it is still fun
  54. hhhgt11
    Sep 8, 2020
    5
    Used to love this game have a thousand hours in it, ruined by the toxic community and cheaters. mnk is everywhere and get ddossed everynow and then. Just got rid of it, hopefully ubisoft starts giving a f about console siege but i doubt it.
  55. Jero29
    Aug 11, 2023
    5
    ¡CASI!

    sip lo que te imaginas en este momento es: NO! le va a dar un 0 ¡PUES NO! le dare un 5 ¿porque? bueno hay 3 razones: 1. este juego es muy bueno y todo peeero, la verdad hay mejores opciones mejor echas. 2. este juego es entretenido? SI! 8 puntos mas 3. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, tubo un downgrade, literalmente (No Es Broma De Verdad) el juego en el trailer se veia de    ¡CASI!

    sip lo que te imaginas en este momento es: NO! le va a dar un 0 ¡PUES NO!

    le dare un 5

    ¿porque?

    bueno hay 3 razones:

    1. este juego es muy bueno y todo peeero, la verdad hay mejores opciones mejor echas.

    2. este juego es entretenido? SI! 8 puntos mas

    3. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, tubo un downgrade, literalmente (No Es Broma De Verdad) el juego en el trailer se veia de ps4, si la consola para la cual se lanzo Peeero esque el juego final parecia de ps3!
    este punto es para mi el mas importante y en mi opinion bajo que tiene este juego, por todo lo demas es recomendado, pero por 2da vez digo, hay juegos (Muchos) 1.000 veces mejor.

    8/10 (Y CON CARIÑO PORQUE SINO UN 5/10 EN VERDAD)

    -Jero29    … Expand
  56. M1sfiT
    Sep 3, 2023
    5
    Gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamessss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! rainbow six siege
  57. chrismango
    Dec 15, 2015
    4
    This Rainbow..... is sad no, campaign. 0 weapon customization and piss poor matchmaking. This is so light on content free to play comes to mind. Its not worth 60.00 or 40.00 bad game ubi soft.. question how do you name a game after books... and you hqve no campaign. No story and you play the same 4 maps all the time...... ubi made watch dogs, so i should have seen this coming. PleaseThis Rainbow..... is sad no, campaign. 0 weapon customization and piss poor matchmaking. This is so light on content free to play comes to mind. Its not worth 60.00 or 40.00 bad game ubi soft.. question how do you name a game after books... and you hqve no campaign. No story and you play the same 4 maps all the time...... ubi made watch dogs, so i should have seen this coming. Please dont buy this game, its worth 20 at best..… Expand
  58. Glitchy97
    Jan 16, 2016
    4
    Boring and repetitive, laggy servers, some cool gadgets but that's about it any cod type fps is more intense and more fun than this, not very fun getting killed by team mates at the start of a round then having to watch them lose
  59. Jacen
    Feb 20, 2016
    4
    This a a sub par game not deserving to have Tom Clancy or Rainbow six attached to it. No story mode is obviously becoming a trend with this generation of gaming and thats a trend that should not be followed if you're a Tom Clancy title. No content. i haven't seen this much lack of content since the sega genesis days. There is only one game mode to play even if you're doing a terroristThis a a sub par game not deserving to have Tom Clancy or Rainbow six attached to it. No story mode is obviously becoming a trend with this generation of gaming and thats a trend that should not be followed if you're a Tom Clancy title. No content. i haven't seen this much lack of content since the sega genesis days. There is only one game mode to play even if you're doing a terrorist hunt, you're still essentially playing online but with the AI. Lack of customizing. Rainbow six vegas was the undisputed king of freedom within the game and before. From customizing Guns, apparel, add-ons and etc. There was nothing you couldn't do. Aren't these new machines suppose to superior? why can't the customizing stay in a more powerful system. I loved having the option to put a silencer on in the middle of the game and taking it off, added something called realism. They obviously tried making a very different game than whats on the market today but its sad to say the game is just not good for. Its good to play for a few matches and then you realize its the same thing again again. Maybe they'll release a DLC to customize the operators they are forcing me to use.… Expand
  60. bearclaws14
    Mar 14, 2016
    4
    Granted, I am not a young player, but this game is a bit too ridiculous from a standpoint of what you can do in situations. No support, no ability to choose your load out, timing of some of these. Sure, they can be done, but not a very good effort in production. I am sure this is just another game - like most everything these days - that is really made for online gaming. A greatGranted, I am not a young player, but this game is a bit too ridiculous from a standpoint of what you can do in situations. No support, no ability to choose your load out, timing of some of these. Sure, they can be done, but not a very good effort in production. I am sure this is just another game - like most everything these days - that is really made for online gaming. A great disappointment for me.… Expand
  61. orange_weebean
    May 10, 2016
    4
    I'm not sure how this game has such a high rating with rampant matchmaking errors. Ranked matchmaking might as well be non-existent. Usually takes about 20-30 minutes to find a ranked game. The gunplay and realism is very cool when you FINALLY do get into a game. There are 11 maps but feels as if there are 3 or 4. There is no campaign. So many steps back from Rainbow Six Vegas in terms ofI'm not sure how this game has such a high rating with rampant matchmaking errors. Ranked matchmaking might as well be non-existent. Usually takes about 20-30 minutes to find a ranked game. The gunplay and realism is very cool when you FINALLY do get into a game. There are 11 maps but feels as if there are 3 or 4. There is no campaign. So many steps back from Rainbow Six Vegas in terms of customization and custom servers. Might be worth getting on a substantial sale if you can deal with the matchmaking issues. I have an Open Nat type and have never experienced such a frustrating matchmaking system on any game before.… Expand
  62. whoischarlotte
    Sep 28, 2017
    4
    As a tactical first person shooter, it didn't go down well with me. I found this to be boring, with the complete lack of campaign and split screen. Waste of money, trading it in was a good decision.
  63. AresYon
    Jul 26, 2020
    4
    TOXIC - Huge problem with this game is the toxic community that thinks no one should play it but them. The system of the vote to kick and team kill ruins the experience for everyone. Shame that people aren't allowed to play a game they spend $60 because the team you don't even know either vote you out or kills you.
  64. OpillReviews
    Jul 17, 2019
    4
    As one of the most promising games I have played, when it was released I enjoyed it quite a lot. However, the operators are being recycled, the fact that the maps are inconsistent - range from great (villa) to absolute dog **** (theme park) and the toxic community who teamkill every round make this a 4 for me. I lost a couple of friends via this game due to the competitive element. it isAs one of the most promising games I have played, when it was released I enjoyed it quite a lot. However, the operators are being recycled, the fact that the maps are inconsistent - range from great (villa) to absolute dog **** (theme park) and the toxic community who teamkill every round make this a 4 for me. I lost a couple of friends via this game due to the competitive element. it is not recommended for the average player. Also complete disregard for ps4 and xbox players. glad i moved on in 2018 after operation chimera (****-mera). 60$ for some skins, get out of here. new event with cowboy is 50$ with only 2/30 able to be unlocked without money. Greedy… Expand
  65. Flashyboy89
    Dec 28, 2020
    4
    I bought R6 Siege when it released Dec 2015. Had a bit of fun doing multiplayer terrorist hunt at the time. Ubisoft basically released the game as a bare-bones beta without telling anyone, for full retail price of 70 Euro and have been releasing PAY-Walled DLC content over the years. People accept this? What is wrong with the people who accept this, seriously? Ubisoft, EA, Activision.I bought R6 Siege when it released Dec 2015. Had a bit of fun doing multiplayer terrorist hunt at the time. Ubisoft basically released the game as a bare-bones beta without telling anyone, for full retail price of 70 Euro and have been releasing PAY-Walled DLC content over the years. People accept this? What is wrong with the people who accept this, seriously? Ubisoft, EA, Activision. Watch out for some of these cabal run companies. Edit: Up-score a little for free PS5 upgrade. The whole thing is set up like a virtual gambling money racket though. Terrible, Terrible value for money.… Expand
  66. Ndesu
    Apr 10, 2020
    4
    Sistema di Matchmaking al limite del ridicolo. Problemi inaccettabili per un titolo di questo calibro. Voto 4
  67. Cmpfcf
    Nov 19, 2020
    4
    I would give a 7 for the game itself but only because of the community is only 4
  68. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    4
    Was fine at first but they are just trowing **** at the wall to see if it sticks. Feels like a free to play game with the amount of dlc's and ****ty graphics. I cringe every time I watch the new cinematics. A disgrace to Tom Clancy 's name.
  69. Kai55
    May 25, 2023
    4
    Before reading , understand i suck

    Unless you love shooters and are very good at them, this isnt really a game you can pick up late in my opinion. Its effectively search and destroy fromolder call of duty titles on hardcore mode at a slower pace and longer waiting times between rounds and games. My general feeling is that I'll sit down to play a game for a couple hours, and if its    Before reading , understand i suck

    Unless you love shooters and are very good at them, this isnt really a game you can pick up late in my opinion.

    Its effectively search and destroy fromolder call of duty titles on hardcore mode at a slower pace and longer waiting times between rounds and games.

    My general feeling is that I'll sit down to play a game for a couple hours, and if its siiege, that two hours will have about 20 minutes of actual gameplay that isnt drving a silly rc car or looking for one, and about 3 minutes of gun fire... Not my cup of tea    … Expand
  70. doonsa11
    Dec 8, 2015
    3
    Although Rainbow Six Siege has a great concept, the mechanics of this game is majorly flawed. Controls are absolutely sloppy and the in game graphics are not up to par with a lot of PS4 games out there.
    I've been told that the PC version is great, but unfortunately, I can only judge the PS4 version and I had to take it back because of the actual game play. Quite disappointing as I was    Although Rainbow Six Siege has a great concept, the mechanics of this game is majorly flawed. Controls are absolutely sloppy and the in game graphics are not up to par with a lot of PS4 games out there.
    I've been told that the PC version is great, but unfortunately, I can only judge the PS4 version and I had to take it back because of the actual game play. Quite disappointing as I was looking forward to this one.    … Expand
  71. claytastic
    Jul 27, 2016
    3
    Holy crap I hate this game. Not only is it a massive disappointment, it's not even really a Tom Clancy game, let alone a Rainbow Six game. If a hyped game is just disappointing, I'd say that. But this goes beyond disappointing. It even goes beyond bad. This might just be up there with some of the worst games I've ever played, and the fact I'm giving it a 3 says something about how many badHoly crap I hate this game. Not only is it a massive disappointment, it's not even really a Tom Clancy game, let alone a Rainbow Six game. If a hyped game is just disappointing, I'd say that. But this goes beyond disappointing. It even goes beyond bad. This might just be up there with some of the worst games I've ever played, and the fact I'm giving it a 3 says something about how many bad games I've played. So let's talk about what makes this game so bad. First, it has a serious lack of content, removing campaign and local multiplayer. Anyone who has ever played a Rainbow Six game will know that these are staples of the series, so they're pretty much essentials. A lot of multiplayer games these days suffer from these additions being removed when they could greatly benefit it. Rainbow Six seems to be the most upsetting one for the removal. Instead of singleplayer campaign, you get operations. Operations are essentially tutorial missions to help you get a feel for gamemodes and certain situations. Let's make this clear: they're awful. They aren't fun, they don't teach you anything. Apparently, their purpose is supposed to be for early XP gain. However, after completing half of them, I barely made it to level 1. It's pretty useless doing them, so I wouldn't bother. Next up we have multiplayer, the heart of the game. Is it fun? Well, no. When you break it down, it's really not. For starters, matchmaking is terrible. It was broken from launch, and that hasn't changed to this day. Even if the matchmaking worked, the multiplayer couldn't save this game. Don't get me wrong, the concept is cool and the game plays well, but it suffers from a multitude of issues. One main one being that the game tries so hard to stress that strategy is key. Well, it's hard to strategizing is pretty damn difficult if your team won't listen to you. I can't blame the developers for this, but I can blame them for why they don't listen. Nobody wants to strategize. Honestly, I'm not feeling the urge to do so either. A lot of the tools given to you seem like they should be used to plane out some trap or attack, but I'd never use them in any certain situation, so they feel like they have no use. It's not just the feeling of no strategy, though. This game is also loaded with bugs. Still. Still! It's been 8 months, why haven't they fixed the bugs!!!!!!! Anyway, I'll wrap up this review so I don't get too angry. To sum it all up, don't invest in Rainbow Six. It's complete garbage. 3/10.… Expand
  72. ZXSth
    Feb 4, 2023
    3
    After experiencing Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 in my younger years and thoroughly enjoying it, I was hoping to experience something similar with Siege, only to be left slack-jawed at just how disappointed it left me.

    Siege's controls and gameplay felt foreign, and it gave me zero reason to maintain any significant level of interest. It is a functional game, but feels entirely devoid of life.    After experiencing Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 in my younger years and thoroughly enjoying it, I was hoping to experience something similar with Siege, only to be left slack-jawed at just how disappointed it left me.

    Siege's controls and gameplay felt foreign, and it gave me zero reason to maintain any significant level of interest. It is a functional game, but feels entirely devoid of life. If you enjoyed Vegas 2, stick to that - none of its charms will be found here.    … Expand
  73. Joogle
    Aug 13, 2019
    3
    Not my favorite game. I think that the game does not use it's full potential if the game had larger more open maps and was not subjected to a single building or structure it would be much more fun and have more of a longevity however I think that gunplay is near flawless.
  74. jakandjoe
    May 3, 2021
    3
    fun game but it is super hard it's so difficult everyones so good and the game is so hard so yea.
  75. Kamarr
    Mar 27, 2018
    2
    Love this game and its 2018!! I just wish there was a bigger player base and better match making.

    Changed. After 1200 hours I can calmly say this game is bad Playerbase is growing, Matchmaking still bad please avoid like the plague. From grifters to mnk players and ubisoft doesn't do anything about it. Recycled guns every new character has the same weapon as someone else. If another    Love this game and its 2018!! I just wish there was a bigger player base and better match making.

    Changed. After 1200 hours I can calmly say this game is bad Playerbase is growing, Matchmaking still bad please avoid like the plague. From grifters to mnk players and ubisoft doesn't do anything about it. Recycled guns every new character has the same weapon as someone else. If another company had the Tom Clancy's name I'm sure they would do a better job of this franchise.    … Expand
  76. QuarterToSix
    Dec 30, 2015
    2
    The most fun, strategic, and addictive game you won't be able to play. Server issues causing a horrible closed beta, was to be expected. Terrible open beta for the same issues, well obviously they must be ironing it out for launch. With Launch came the same issues, and now with the holiday peak servers not functional.

    Don't get me wrong it is a good game. But with no single player    The most fun, strategic, and addictive game you won't be able to play. Server issues causing a horrible closed beta, was to be expected. Terrible open beta for the same issues, well obviously they must be ironing it out for launch. With Launch came the same issues, and now with the holiday peak servers not functional.

    Don't get me wrong it is a good game. But with no single player campaign the game basically requires multiplayer. Having constant server issues making it impossible to play bet the games shelf life to be short.

    Just check the lack of updates from Ubisoft, their forums exploding with complaints, and Twitter reaction.

    You may want to hold off on it to save yourself the frustration.    … Expand
  77. arostislavna
    May 23, 2021
    2
    (Disclaimer: I have played this game since pre-alpha)

    Great gameplay with destructible environments, but the direction shifts away from anything remotely similar to counter-terror units, and contain fictitious weapons such as the Scorpion EVO S1 Carbine that should be only semi auto (only the SMG variant has a fire select) This game is not noob-friendly, contains a ton of cheaters on    (Disclaimer: I have played this game since pre-alpha)

    Great gameplay with destructible environments, but the direction shifts away from anything remotely similar to counter-terror units, and contain fictitious weapons such as the Scorpion EVO S1 Carbine that should be only semi auto (only the SMG variant has a fire select)

    This game is not noob-friendly, contains a ton of cheaters on PC, people who use keyboard and mouse on console, and glitchers that will abuse a glitch until mid-season patches.

    The microtransactions are vast and have a lot of diversity, while containing systems that are obsolete for 2020 standards, on top of a paywall entry, and lack of operators with the standard version... they basically force you spend at least $180 if you want any chance at winning from a brand new account's perspective.

    Lastly, do not claim this game has any realism, because it hasn't had an element of realism since year 1.    … Expand
  78. Sammiches25
    May 20, 2020
    2
    This game is in such a weird spot for me for several reasons. On one hand, it has/had the best online combat that required the most tactical thought of any game I've played. On the other hand, if you play the game on anything other than ranked/unranked (level 30 and 10 minimum), the game essentially becomes a team back stabbing simulator to see who or how your team will kill you. You spendThis game is in such a weird spot for me for several reasons. On one hand, it has/had the best online combat that required the most tactical thought of any game I've played. On the other hand, if you play the game on anything other than ranked/unranked (level 30 and 10 minimum), the game essentially becomes a team back stabbing simulator to see who or how your team will kill you. You spend 2/3 matches getting shot in the back by your teammates or blown up before you can move because there is virtually no serious repercussions for betraying your team and throwing a match. The reason I get so bitter about it is because I dump $30 into the game and then I'm immediately reminded (repeatedly) why I stop playing every two years. I've played this game over the course of five years and they have barely done anything about team kills. Used to be you had to kill two team mates before they'd kick you and make you wait just 15 minutes (which is oddly generous.) Now, you kill someone and it activates reflective damage if that person marks it as intentional. That would almost solve it except their team mates are typically exempt so if they still want you dead, they can kill you until the squad has reflective damage. The magic is, there's no repercussions for repeat offenders either. In one day of playing, you could wait for the various cooldowns and get away with 20-30 team mate kills if you were bored. It's absolutely **** that the penalties for leaving a game early is worse than shooting your own team.

    I originally bought this in Feb 2016 when the gold edition was down to $30 because they thought it was a failure (which serves them right for the deception they pulled at E3 2015.) What's ironic is that now I think the game is in a worse position than it was at that time. Aside from the constant shots to the back, children playing like it's COD, and your own team mates actively working against you, there's also the monetization that's become a problem. You pay $20-40 for a game that then makes you spend 2-3 weeks unlocking even just the basic content which is the operators. Then, if you want skins for your guns or uniforms, you either have to pay hard cash, gamble (with strong odds for duplicates), or wait several weeks/months to get it. Obviously the goal is that you pay to run into a pay wall that is either overcome by playing the game even more for a really long time, or paying even more. Proof is that the "epic" uniforms cost an equivalent of about $8-10 and the legendary are about $15 for what amounts to 2-3 items if that. This game would be as bad as Fortnite and Epic, except that at least those are free and you don't have people shooting you in the back randomly because they think it's hilarious.

    The good news is, I have several throwaway PSN accounts and I'm totally going to be blowing myself and as many teams as I can up so maybe they'll finally do something about it. **** you Ubisoft. I won't be buying anything from you people anymore and you're going to have a lot more pissed off players very soon. If for some reason I do end up with any more of your trash, I'll be sure to make the other online experiences just as unpleasant for everyone as I can manage. I have literally all day and night every day. It won't take long before literally hundreds of players are done with your half baked ****    … Expand
  79. OC_Hugz
    May 10, 2019
    2
    Hackers everywhere and sound bugs ruined this game. Over 500 hours and I am done. Ubisoft has given up
  80. DeathSurgeon
    Aug 5, 2020
    2
    This game is full of bugs, glitches, cheaters, ddosers, very bad servers and hitboxes.
    The only reason Im still playing it is because it's one of a kind. I hope they make a better game of the same style so that I can dump this trash in the toilet.
  81. codfaaan
    Jan 23, 2021
    2
    allora,ho giocato diverso ore a questo titolo e ora mi sento pronto a scriverne una recensione,il gioco ha troppi problemi,quindi da qualche parte devo cominciare e partirei dai contenuti che in questo gioco sono davvero scarni. il gioco offre le simulazioni che fanno da tutorial, sono noiosissime e basta, fanno cagare. passiamo al fulcro cioè il multiplayer, che offre un totale di 3allora,ho giocato diverso ore a questo titolo e ora mi sento pronto a scriverne una recensione,il gioco ha troppi problemi,quindi da qualche parte devo cominciare e partirei dai contenuti che in questo gioco sono davvero scarni. il gioco offre le simulazioni che fanno da tutorial, sono noiosissime e basta, fanno cagare. passiamo al fulcro cioè il multiplayer, che offre un totale di 3 modalità, bombe, contenitore e ostaggio. inoltre offre altre tre tipi di "sottocategorie" di partite che sono: libere, classificate , non classificate. le libere sono partite che si fanno per cazzeggiare e non contano. le classificate sono partite in cui gioco per salire di rango, invece le non classificate sono uguali alle classificate solo che non ti cambiano il rango.
    ah, è vero, quasi scordavo il più bello!
    nelle classificate e non classificate c'è solo una modalità cioè bombe.
    quindi già il gioco offre poche modalità e nella classificate (partite più giocate ed importanti) puoi giocarne solo una, cioè ma è uno scherzo?
    poi manca la campagna che è sempre stata il punto di forza dei vecchi capitoli della saga e qui è scomparsa a caso.
    poi a volte il gioco è piagato da glitch che lo rendono ingiocabile e dosser che interrompono le partite facendoti bloccare.
    e se a questo vogliamo aggiungere anche che la community è una delle più tossiche che abbia mai visto....
    poi vabbè il gioco sta peggiorando aggiungendo operatori sempre più inverosimili che rovinano sempre di più lo stile realistico che caratterizzava il gioco un esempio: hanno aggiunto un operatore che sfonda i muri correndoci contro, ma che cazzo mi dovrebbe rappresentare?
    il mio voto non può andare oltre il 2.
    se vi piace il gioco, o siete dei casual gamer di merda, o non avete mai provato un vero rainbow six    … Expand
  82. jac283
    Jan 26, 2016
    1
    decent potential but glitchy, broken, and incomplete. matchmaking is horrendous. the number of hackers is going up by the day. all game modes are basically the same
  83. Yoshimitsu84
    Dec 3, 2015
    1
    I'm not even sure where to begin honestly....

    People review this game and games in general because they care about it, they truly do if they invest time to talk about it. so whats positive? - Music (yes, I found it nice honestly) - the idea that you got different agents (tho absolutely not as I expect it to be, more details below) - the concept of defending is somewhat improved in    I'm not even sure where to begin honestly....

    People review this game and games in general because they care about it, they truly do if they invest time to talk about it.

    so whats positive?
    - Music (yes, I found it nice honestly)
    - the idea that you got different agents (tho absolutely not as I expect it to be, more details below)
    - the concept of defending is somewhat improved in a certain way compared to its predecessors

    whats bad?:
    boy oh boy where do I start?...

    - LAG (the game is unplayable, 1 shots without seeing bullets?), it's just unplayable most of the times
    - No customization of the agents (very basic in fact, just look at games like Rainbow six: Raven Shield or Rogue Spear and you'll understand what is missing here... it's just dull and extremely basic...
    - No modes (seriously, every mode they have, that I guess are somewhat 3, feel all the same... no all vs all, no possibility to choose the map and you are not even able to choose the mod u wanna play... that is just depressing).
    - Match Making lag/loop (if you cant find a match, the solution according to Ubi, is to quit the menu and enter again... Why do I need to be forced to find a workaround like that instead of implementing a proper Match making feature?...)
    - Wall glitches, body parts passing trough the walls, showing off your position in a tactical game is just plain retarded

    and the list goes on, I just cba anymore to list the negative stuff. As a customer who basically has/had all the Rainbow six games for PC I am speechless at how low Ubi fell down, I am deeply saddend and very disappointed.

    Shame on you guys, how can you even feel good about this?...    … Expand
  84. Atiwiex
    Jul 16, 2017
    1
    Don't buy this game, it is a waste of money. This game has a lot of potential but because it's a Ubisoft ip, it is terrible. They don't listen to the community what so ever, therefore no MAJOR problems with the game are every fixed. I'M NOT EXAGGERATING the hit registration is awful, the game will crash frequently (AND SOMETIMES WHEN IT CRASHES IT **** UNINSTALLS ITSELF), the game has aDon't buy this game, it is a waste of money. This game has a lot of potential but because it's a Ubisoft ip, it is terrible. They don't listen to the community what so ever, therefore no MAJOR problems with the game are every fixed. I'M NOT EXAGGERATING the hit registration is awful, the game will crash frequently (AND SOMETIMES WHEN IT CRASHES IT **** UNINSTALLS ITSELF), the game has a ton of bugs that Ubisoft just refuses to listen and fix!!!… Expand
  85. tanay97
    Oct 29, 2017
    1
    If you have skill, don't buy this game. If you are smart, don't buy this game. This game rewards luck and omly luck. If you have good aim, u will suck at this game. If you play tactically, u will lose. This is a game where luck is key. If you practice in this game, u will fail 100%. The best thing to do to win is run in without droning. It works for everyone else but me, but **** it. ThisIf you have skill, don't buy this game. If you are smart, don't buy this game. This game rewards luck and omly luck. If you have good aim, u will suck at this game. If you play tactically, u will lose. This is a game where luck is key. If you practice in this game, u will fail 100%. The best thing to do to win is run in without droning. It works for everyone else but me, but **** it. This game is so ****ing ****… Expand
  86. dasbo
    Nov 24, 2017
    1
    I regret a lot buying this game, stay away from it.
    Pay to win, lots of micro transactions and you basically have to pay to unlock anything (or grind for hours and hours for a single character or item), this game should be free to play by the level of micro transactions it contains.
  87. RottenCritic
    Oct 14, 2021
    1
    This isn't a siege, this is camping trip with horrible matchmaking times. This should be free with the micro transactions and battle passes tossed in. People that rate this a 10 are simps for either ubisoft or fan boys of playing games that rewards camping.
  88. CXC2INQRGx2D
    Jul 19, 2019
    1
    Самая отвратительная игра в плане багов, комьюнити, стрельбы, так точно, эта игра отберёт у тебя время, нервы и деньги, я ненавижу эту игру, как минимум потому, что если ты играешь без свой команды - то ты никто, если не делаешь айс за раунд.Самая отвратительная игра в плане багов, комьюнити, стрельбы, так точно, эта игра отберёт у тебя время, нервы и деньги, я ненавижу эту игру, как минимум потому, что если ты играешь без свой команды - то ты никто, если не делаешь айс за раунд.
  89. unionmark
    Nov 1, 2019
    1
    I like the game I mean it's well designed and has thought put into it but sadly the ping ruins the entire game you have to be in Montreal to have a good time with this game and i fear that it won't get any better any time soon
  90. KevinGostosin
    Apr 10, 2020
    1
    ASH TANKOU,NAO CONSIGO GANHAR DE CESINHA O JOGO É TITALTATE E EU VOU GANHAR DE CESINHA CUSTE O QUE CUSTAR
  91. nibbble
    Jan 2, 2021
    1
    Pretty good game ruined by the toxic community and the devs. The game has so many issues all the time, and issues that comes back with updates. The devs clearly only caters to the pro, which doesn't make for a good experience for the average player. So this was a yes for me, but nowadays, it's a huge fat no.
    The closer you live to the server, the better your K.D is gonna be. and that's a fact!
  92. EscorpiaoVEJR
    Sep 28, 2021
    1
    R6 talvez não seja o jogo mais desbalanceado do mercado, afinal, a empresa lança atualizações mesmo depois de 5 anos do seu lançamento, porém se prepare para se frustar ao encontrar um jogo com mecânicas quebras ele uma disparidade enorme entre jogadores.
    Ainda hoje enfrenta problemas de personagens imortais, e balas que mais parecem explosivos, pela quantidade ridícula de dano, apesar    R6 talvez não seja o jogo mais desbalanceado do mercado, afinal, a empresa lança atualizações mesmo depois de 5 anos do seu lançamento, porém se prepare para se frustar ao encontrar um jogo com mecânicas quebras ele uma disparidade enorme entre jogadores.
    Ainda hoje enfrenta problemas de personagens imortais, e balas que mais parecem explosivos, pela quantidade ridícula de dano, apesar disso ainda é um jogo que tenta simular a realidade, e muita ênfase em "simular" porque ele só tenta, nenhum ser humano sobreviveria a uma rajada de balas no peito.
    Se prepare para se frustar ao jogar esse jogo.    … Expand
  93. OtakuAnime
    Oct 13, 2022
    1
    The game is a very intense FPS game. I used to play rank on this game, getting as highly skilled as Diamond. However, the game is very frustrating when it updates. The game always feels there is some kind of error. After updates, I always try to give it a week, because the audio sounds were always messed up, it was also a time where ranking would be frustrating as you could run into higherThe game is a very intense FPS game. I used to play rank on this game, getting as highly skilled as Diamond. However, the game is very frustrating when it updates. The game always feels there is some kind of error. After updates, I always try to give it a week, because the audio sounds were always messed up, it was also a time where ranking would be frustrating as you could run into higher skilled players and very low skilled players during placements matches. The idea of droning ahead for intelligence and team calling and scouting is great. I absolutely loved the idea that even with bad aim, you can do well on a team. However, there are indeed the arrogant and annoying players on the game. The game also lacks a better system of anti-cheats. I have found a very small but reasonable amount of cheaters in games. They tend to be leaning towards casual or un-ranked than ranked.… Expand
  94. Volumeplus
    Feb 21, 2016
    0
    Fun game, but it is too bad it is literally unplayable 95.4% of the time due to server issues. I had even put my PS4 in DMZ to try and stop the constant disconnects. With no luck. If I could get a refund I would.
  95. el_prez
    Dec 2, 2015
    0
    Garbage - absolute garbage.
    OK, say we give Ubisoft a pass on the weak rollout beta, say we give them a pass on the lack of mp modes, say we give them a pass on the really bad graphics/player movements and animations - RB6S is just straight up boring. I've been playing Tom Clancy days since the days of the original Rainbow Six on PC and I really enjoyed RB6 Vegas but this is a huge step    Garbage - absolute garbage.
    OK, say we give Ubisoft a pass on the weak rollout beta, say we give them a pass on the lack of mp modes, say we give them a pass on the really bad graphics/player movements and animations - RB6S is just straight up boring. I've been playing Tom Clancy days since the days of the original Rainbow Six on PC and I really enjoyed RB6 Vegas but this is a huge step back in the evolution of the tactical genre.
    I guess my problem is the game just puts me to sleep, there's no excitement or tension in this game - its just defend, now invade, back to defend. Maybe mix in a terrorist hunt. Back to defend, then invade again.
    And before you call me a COD fan boy/Run and Gun type, I'm not. At all. But I do like some actual tension and drama in my shooter - this has none. I was hoping it would be more like TLOU Factions....
    Also, can we please change the voice of the kid who announces the objective at the start of the round - he sounds like the kid at Von's who bags my groceries - not a military commander.    … Expand
  96. heronn
    Dec 3, 2015
    0
    All that needs to be said is the graphics are years behind and the gameplay is like watching paint dry. So old and dated with no game modes. Probably the worst game I have ever played.
  97. statusone
    Dec 2, 2015
    0
    I registered for Metacritic specifically to give this game a zero. I waited for this POS for over a year. Hyped it up with my friends and forced one of them to also buy it only to find out that I literally cannot play the game. I have been stuck at the "creating squad" loading screen for both betas and now the actual game. Apparently this is due to the netcode Ubisoft has created whichI registered for Metacritic specifically to give this game a zero. I waited for this POS for over a year. Hyped it up with my friends and forced one of them to also buy it only to find out that I literally cannot play the game. I have been stuck at the "creating squad" loading screen for both betas and now the actual game. Apparently this is due to the netcode Ubisoft has created which interferes with certain ISPs. They knowingly shipped a game that failed in beta that they don't have a solution for. Literally theft of $60 and now I have to deal with not only that but the ire of a friend. Thanks Ubisoft for the stealing.… Expand
  98. BatmanOnATurtle
    Jun 14, 2017
    0
    I wouldn't recommend purchasing the game. It's basically just camping, the only thing I like about Siege is that you can teamkill. Uninstalled it after 2 hours :/
  99. MRPOTUS
    Feb 27, 2020
    0
    Playstation+ just to be able to play against BOTS!

    Seriously? The game is kind of fun, but all this monetization takes all the fun out of it. There is no way to play by yourself, and if you like me enjoy LONE WOLF. Well guess what, you need a PS+ for that! More and more i see this corrupted and disgusting approach from more and more publishers! And Ubisoft are way up there    Playstation+ just to be able to play against BOTS!

    Seriously?

    The game is kind of fun, but all this monetization takes all the fun out of it.

    There is no way to play by yourself, and if you like me enjoy LONE WOLF. Well guess what, you need a PS+ for that!

    More and more i see this corrupted and disgusting approach from more and more publishers!

    And Ubisoft are way up there with the worst of them!

    No more support from me regarding this game!

    Shove it up your tailpipe!    … Expand
  100. Lonit
    Sep 16, 2019
    0
    used to be good. I can't stabd censorship and the weak, pandering people at ubisoft did a lot of it.
Page:

Awards & Rankings

18
#18 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2015
18
#18 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 40 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 40
  2. Mixed: 16 out of 40
  3. Negative: 1 out of 40
  1. Edge Magazine
    Feb 16, 2016
    60
    Siege can feel cool and inhospitable, but when the conditions are right and you're playing with friends, the game's tense gameplay and measured pacing makes for a refreshing, cerebral contrast to the run-and-gun hyperactivity of most online shooters. [Feb 2016, p.104]
  2. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Feb 10, 2016
    80
    Impossible to recommend as a single-player game. Siege is an absolutely splendid multiplayer shooter for well-organised (and forgiving) teams, with great tactical terrain destruction. [Feb 2016, p.86]
  3. Play UK
    Jan 16, 2016
    80
    A slight but superior multiplayer experience. What it lacks in single-player content, Rainbow Six Siege makes up in sheer quality. Just remember to use voice chat. [Issue#265, p.76]
See all critic reviews »