Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege

 PlayStation 4
User Score
7.2

Mixed or average reviews- based on 1157 Ratings

User score distribution:
  1. Positive: 737 out of 1157
  2. Mixed: 224 out of 1157
  3. Negative: 196 out of 1157
Buy Now
Buy on

Review this game

  1. Your Score
    0 out of 10
    Rate this:
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
  1. Submit
  2. Check Spelling
view
per page
  1. chrismango
    Dec 15, 2015
    4
    This Rainbow..... is sad no, campaign. 0 weapon customization and piss poor matchmaking. This is so light on content free to play comes to mind. Its not worth 60.00 or 40.00 bad game ubi soft.. question how do you name a game after books... and you hqve no campaign. No story and you play the same 4 maps all the time...... ubi made watch dogs, so i should have seen this coming. PleaseThis Rainbow..... is sad no, campaign. 0 weapon customization and piss poor matchmaking. This is so light on content free to play comes to mind. Its not worth 60.00 or 40.00 bad game ubi soft.. question how do you name a game after books... and you hqve no campaign. No story and you play the same 4 maps all the time...... ubi made watch dogs, so i should have seen this coming. Please dont buy this game, its worth 20 at best..… Expand
  2. Glitchy97
    Jan 16, 2016
    4
    Boring and repetitive, laggy servers, some cool gadgets but that's about it any cod type fps is more intense and more fun than this, not very fun getting killed by team mates at the start of a round then having to watch them lose
  3. Jacen
    Feb 20, 2016
    4
    This a a sub par game not deserving to have Tom Clancy or Rainbow six attached to it. No story mode is obviously becoming a trend with this generation of gaming and thats a trend that should not be followed if you're a Tom Clancy title. No content. i haven't seen this much lack of content since the sega genesis days. There is only one game mode to play even if you're doing a terroristThis a a sub par game not deserving to have Tom Clancy or Rainbow six attached to it. No story mode is obviously becoming a trend with this generation of gaming and thats a trend that should not be followed if you're a Tom Clancy title. No content. i haven't seen this much lack of content since the sega genesis days. There is only one game mode to play even if you're doing a terrorist hunt, you're still essentially playing online but with the AI. Lack of customizing. Rainbow six vegas was the undisputed king of freedom within the game and before. From customizing Guns, apparel, add-ons and etc. There was nothing you couldn't do. Aren't these new machines suppose to superior? why can't the customizing stay in a more powerful system. I loved having the option to put a silencer on in the middle of the game and taking it off, added something called realism. They obviously tried making a very different game than whats on the market today but its sad to say the game is just not good for. Its good to play for a few matches and then you realize its the same thing again again. Maybe they'll release a DLC to customize the operators they are forcing me to use.… Expand
  4. bearclaws14
    Mar 14, 2016
    4
    Granted, I am not a young player, but this game is a bit too ridiculous from a standpoint of what you can do in situations. No support, no ability to choose your load out, timing of some of these. Sure, they can be done, but not a very good effort in production. I am sure this is just another game - like most everything these days - that is really made for online gaming. A greatGranted, I am not a young player, but this game is a bit too ridiculous from a standpoint of what you can do in situations. No support, no ability to choose your load out, timing of some of these. Sure, they can be done, but not a very good effort in production. I am sure this is just another game - like most everything these days - that is really made for online gaming. A great disappointment for me.… Expand
  5. orange_weebean
    May 10, 2016
    4
    I'm not sure how this game has such a high rating with rampant matchmaking errors. Ranked matchmaking might as well be non-existent. Usually takes about 20-30 minutes to find a ranked game. The gunplay and realism is very cool when you FINALLY do get into a game. There are 11 maps but feels as if there are 3 or 4. There is no campaign. So many steps back from Rainbow Six Vegas in terms ofI'm not sure how this game has such a high rating with rampant matchmaking errors. Ranked matchmaking might as well be non-existent. Usually takes about 20-30 minutes to find a ranked game. The gunplay and realism is very cool when you FINALLY do get into a game. There are 11 maps but feels as if there are 3 or 4. There is no campaign. So many steps back from Rainbow Six Vegas in terms of customization and custom servers. Might be worth getting on a substantial sale if you can deal with the matchmaking issues. I have an Open Nat type and have never experienced such a frustrating matchmaking system on any game before.… Expand
  6. whoischarlotte
    Sep 28, 2017
    4
    As a tactical first person shooter, it didn't go down well with me. I found this to be boring, with the complete lack of campaign and split screen. Waste of money, trading it in was a good decision.
  7. AresYon
    Jul 26, 2020
    4
    TOXIC - Huge problem with this game is the toxic community that thinks no one should play it but them. The system of the vote to kick and team kill ruins the experience for everyone. Shame that people aren't allowed to play a game they spend $60 because the team you don't even know either vote you out or kills you.
  8. OpillReviews
    Jul 17, 2019
    4
    As one of the most promising games I have played, when it was released I enjoyed it quite a lot. However, the operators are being recycled, the fact that the maps are inconsistent - range from great (villa) to absolute dog **** (theme park) and the toxic community who teamkill every round make this a 4 for me. I lost a couple of friends via this game due to the competitive element. it isAs one of the most promising games I have played, when it was released I enjoyed it quite a lot. However, the operators are being recycled, the fact that the maps are inconsistent - range from great (villa) to absolute dog **** (theme park) and the toxic community who teamkill every round make this a 4 for me. I lost a couple of friends via this game due to the competitive element. it is not recommended for the average player. Also complete disregard for ps4 and xbox players. glad i moved on in 2018 after operation chimera (****-mera). 60$ for some skins, get out of here. new event with cowboy is 50$ with only 2/30 able to be unlocked without money. Greedy… Expand
  9. Flashyboy89
    Dec 28, 2020
    4
    I bought R6 Siege when it released Dec 2015. Had a bit of fun doing multiplayer terrorist hunt at the time. Ubisoft basically released the game as a bare-bones beta without telling anyone, for full retail price of 70 Euro and have been releasing PAY-Walled DLC content over the years. People accept this? What is wrong with the people who accept this, seriously? Ubisoft, EA, Activision.I bought R6 Siege when it released Dec 2015. Had a bit of fun doing multiplayer terrorist hunt at the time. Ubisoft basically released the game as a bare-bones beta without telling anyone, for full retail price of 70 Euro and have been releasing PAY-Walled DLC content over the years. People accept this? What is wrong with the people who accept this, seriously? Ubisoft, EA, Activision. Watch out for some of these cabal run companies. Edit: Up-score a little for free PS5 upgrade. The whole thing is set up like a virtual gambling money racket though. Terrible, Terrible value for money.… Expand
  10. Ndesu
    Apr 10, 2020
    4
    Sistema di Matchmaking al limite del ridicolo. Problemi inaccettabili per un titolo di questo calibro. Voto 4
  11. Cmpfcf
    Nov 19, 2020
    4
    I would give a 7 for the game itself but only because of the community is only 4
  12. MaxieZeus
    Sep 20, 2022
    4
    Was fine at first but they are just trowing **** at the wall to see if it sticks. Feels like a free to play game with the amount of dlc's and ****ty graphics. I cringe every time I watch the new cinematics. A disgrace to Tom Clancy 's name.
  13. Kai55
    May 25, 2023
    4
    Before reading , understand i suck

    Unless you love shooters and are very good at them, this isnt really a game you can pick up late in my opinion. Its effectively search and destroy fromolder call of duty titles on hardcore mode at a slower pace and longer waiting times between rounds and games. My general feeling is that I'll sit down to play a game for a couple hours, and if its    Before reading , understand i suck

    Unless you love shooters and are very good at them, this isnt really a game you can pick up late in my opinion.

    Its effectively search and destroy fromolder call of duty titles on hardcore mode at a slower pace and longer waiting times between rounds and games.

    My general feeling is that I'll sit down to play a game for a couple hours, and if its siiege, that two hours will have about 20 minutes of actual gameplay that isnt drving a silly rc car or looking for one, and about 3 minutes of gun fire... Not my cup of tea    … Expand
  14. doonsa11
    Dec 8, 2015
    3
    Although Rainbow Six Siege has a great concept, the mechanics of this game is majorly flawed. Controls are absolutely sloppy and the in game graphics are not up to par with a lot of PS4 games out there.
    I've been told that the PC version is great, but unfortunately, I can only judge the PS4 version and I had to take it back because of the actual game play. Quite disappointing as I was    Although Rainbow Six Siege has a great concept, the mechanics of this game is majorly flawed. Controls are absolutely sloppy and the in game graphics are not up to par with a lot of PS4 games out there.
    I've been told that the PC version is great, but unfortunately, I can only judge the PS4 version and I had to take it back because of the actual game play. Quite disappointing as I was looking forward to this one.    … Expand
  15. claytastic
    Jul 27, 2016
    3
    Holy crap I hate this game. Not only is it a massive disappointment, it's not even really a Tom Clancy game, let alone a Rainbow Six game. If a hyped game is just disappointing, I'd say that. But this goes beyond disappointing. It even goes beyond bad. This might just be up there with some of the worst games I've ever played, and the fact I'm giving it a 3 says something about how many badHoly crap I hate this game. Not only is it a massive disappointment, it's not even really a Tom Clancy game, let alone a Rainbow Six game. If a hyped game is just disappointing, I'd say that. But this goes beyond disappointing. It even goes beyond bad. This might just be up there with some of the worst games I've ever played, and the fact I'm giving it a 3 says something about how many bad games I've played. So let's talk about what makes this game so bad. First, it has a serious lack of content, removing campaign and local multiplayer. Anyone who has ever played a Rainbow Six game will know that these are staples of the series, so they're pretty much essentials. A lot of multiplayer games these days suffer from these additions being removed when they could greatly benefit it. Rainbow Six seems to be the most upsetting one for the removal. Instead of singleplayer campaign, you get operations. Operations are essentially tutorial missions to help you get a feel for gamemodes and certain situations. Let's make this clear: they're awful. They aren't fun, they don't teach you anything. Apparently, their purpose is supposed to be for early XP gain. However, after completing half of them, I barely made it to level 1. It's pretty useless doing them, so I wouldn't bother. Next up we have multiplayer, the heart of the game. Is it fun? Well, no. When you break it down, it's really not. For starters, matchmaking is terrible. It was broken from launch, and that hasn't changed to this day. Even if the matchmaking worked, the multiplayer couldn't save this game. Don't get me wrong, the concept is cool and the game plays well, but it suffers from a multitude of issues. One main one being that the game tries so hard to stress that strategy is key. Well, it's hard to strategizing is pretty damn difficult if your team won't listen to you. I can't blame the developers for this, but I can blame them for why they don't listen. Nobody wants to strategize. Honestly, I'm not feeling the urge to do so either. A lot of the tools given to you seem like they should be used to plane out some trap or attack, but I'd never use them in any certain situation, so they feel like they have no use. It's not just the feeling of no strategy, though. This game is also loaded with bugs. Still. Still! It's been 8 months, why haven't they fixed the bugs!!!!!!! Anyway, I'll wrap up this review so I don't get too angry. To sum it all up, don't invest in Rainbow Six. It's complete garbage. 3/10.… Expand
  16. ZXSth
    Feb 4, 2023
    3
    After experiencing Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 in my younger years and thoroughly enjoying it, I was hoping to experience something similar with Siege, only to be left slack-jawed at just how disappointed it left me.

    Siege's controls and gameplay felt foreign, and it gave me zero reason to maintain any significant level of interest. It is a functional game, but feels entirely devoid of life.    After experiencing Rainbow Six: Vegas 2 in my younger years and thoroughly enjoying it, I was hoping to experience something similar with Siege, only to be left slack-jawed at just how disappointed it left me.

    Siege's controls and gameplay felt foreign, and it gave me zero reason to maintain any significant level of interest. It is a functional game, but feels entirely devoid of life. If you enjoyed Vegas 2, stick to that - none of its charms will be found here.    … Expand
  17. Joogle
    Aug 13, 2019
    3
    Not my favorite game. I think that the game does not use it's full potential if the game had larger more open maps and was not subjected to a single building or structure it would be much more fun and have more of a longevity however I think that gunplay is near flawless.
  18. jakandjoe
    May 3, 2021
    3
    fun game but it is super hard it's so difficult everyones so good and the game is so hard so yea.
  19. Kamarr
    Mar 27, 2018
    2
    Love this game and its 2018!! I just wish there was a bigger player base and better match making.

    Changed. After 1200 hours I can calmly say this game is bad Playerbase is growing, Matchmaking still bad please avoid like the plague. From grifters to mnk players and ubisoft doesn't do anything about it. Recycled guns every new character has the same weapon as someone else. If another    Love this game and its 2018!! I just wish there was a bigger player base and better match making.

    Changed. After 1200 hours I can calmly say this game is bad Playerbase is growing, Matchmaking still bad please avoid like the plague. From grifters to mnk players and ubisoft doesn't do anything about it. Recycled guns every new character has the same weapon as someone else. If another company had the Tom Clancy's name I'm sure they would do a better job of this franchise.    … Expand
  20. QuarterToSix
    Dec 30, 2015
    2
    The most fun, strategic, and addictive game you won't be able to play. Server issues causing a horrible closed beta, was to be expected. Terrible open beta for the same issues, well obviously they must be ironing it out for launch. With Launch came the same issues, and now with the holiday peak servers not functional.

    Don't get me wrong it is a good game. But with no single player    The most fun, strategic, and addictive game you won't be able to play. Server issues causing a horrible closed beta, was to be expected. Terrible open beta for the same issues, well obviously they must be ironing it out for launch. With Launch came the same issues, and now with the holiday peak servers not functional.

    Don't get me wrong it is a good game. But with no single player campaign the game basically requires multiplayer. Having constant server issues making it impossible to play bet the games shelf life to be short.

    Just check the lack of updates from Ubisoft, their forums exploding with complaints, and Twitter reaction.

    You may want to hold off on it to save yourself the frustration.    … Expand
  21. arostislavna
    May 23, 2021
    2
    (Disclaimer: I have played this game since pre-alpha)

    Great gameplay with destructible environments, but the direction shifts away from anything remotely similar to counter-terror units, and contain fictitious weapons such as the Scorpion EVO S1 Carbine that should be only semi auto (only the SMG variant has a fire select) This game is not noob-friendly, contains a ton of cheaters on    (Disclaimer: I have played this game since pre-alpha)

    Great gameplay with destructible environments, but the direction shifts away from anything remotely similar to counter-terror units, and contain fictitious weapons such as the Scorpion EVO S1 Carbine that should be only semi auto (only the SMG variant has a fire select)

    This game is not noob-friendly, contains a ton of cheaters on PC, people who use keyboard and mouse on console, and glitchers that will abuse a glitch until mid-season patches.

    The microtransactions are vast and have a lot of diversity, while containing systems that are obsolete for 2020 standards, on top of a paywall entry, and lack of operators with the standard version... they basically force you spend at least $180 if you want any chance at winning from a brand new account's perspective.

    Lastly, do not claim this game has any realism, because it hasn't had an element of realism since year 1.    … Expand
  22. Sammiches25
    May 20, 2020
    2
    This game is in such a weird spot for me for several reasons. On one hand, it has/had the best online combat that required the most tactical thought of any game I've played. On the other hand, if you play the game on anything other than ranked/unranked (level 30 and 10 minimum), the game essentially becomes a team back stabbing simulator to see who or how your team will kill you. You spendThis game is in such a weird spot for me for several reasons. On one hand, it has/had the best online combat that required the most tactical thought of any game I've played. On the other hand, if you play the game on anything other than ranked/unranked (level 30 and 10 minimum), the game essentially becomes a team back stabbing simulator to see who or how your team will kill you. You spend 2/3 matches getting shot in the back by your teammates or blown up before you can move because there is virtually no serious repercussions for betraying your team and throwing a match. The reason I get so bitter about it is because I dump $30 into the game and then I'm immediately reminded (repeatedly) why I stop playing every two years. I've played this game over the course of five years and they have barely done anything about team kills. Used to be you had to kill two team mates before they'd kick you and make you wait just 15 minutes (which is oddly generous.) Now, you kill someone and it activates reflective damage if that person marks it as intentional. That would almost solve it except their team mates are typically exempt so if they still want you dead, they can kill you until the squad has reflective damage. The magic is, there's no repercussions for repeat offenders either. In one day of playing, you could wait for the various cooldowns and get away with 20-30 team mate kills if you were bored. It's absolutely **** that the penalties for leaving a game early is worse than shooting your own team.

    I originally bought this in Feb 2016 when the gold edition was down to $30 because they thought it was a failure (which serves them right for the deception they pulled at E3 2015.) What's ironic is that now I think the game is in a worse position than it was at that time. Aside from the constant shots to the back, children playing like it's COD, and your own team mates actively working against you, there's also the monetization that's become a problem. You pay $20-40 for a game that then makes you spend 2-3 weeks unlocking even just the basic content which is the operators. Then, if you want skins for your guns or uniforms, you either have to pay hard cash, gamble (with strong odds for duplicates), or wait several weeks/months to get it. Obviously the goal is that you pay to run into a pay wall that is either overcome by playing the game even more for a really long time, or paying even more. Proof is that the "epic" uniforms cost an equivalent of about $8-10 and the legendary are about $15 for what amounts to 2-3 items if that. This game would be as bad as Fortnite and Epic, except that at least those are free and you don't have people shooting you in the back randomly because they think it's hilarious.

    The good news is, I have several throwaway PSN accounts and I'm totally going to be blowing myself and as many teams as I can up so maybe they'll finally do something about it. **** you Ubisoft. I won't be buying anything from you people anymore and you're going to have a lot more pissed off players very soon. If for some reason I do end up with any more of your trash, I'll be sure to make the other online experiences just as unpleasant for everyone as I can manage. I have literally all day and night every day. It won't take long before literally hundreds of players are done with your half baked ****    … Expand
  23. OC_Hugz
    May 10, 2019
    2
    Hackers everywhere and sound bugs ruined this game. Over 500 hours and I am done. Ubisoft has given up
  24. DeathSurgeon
    Aug 5, 2020
    2
    This game is full of bugs, glitches, cheaters, ddosers, very bad servers and hitboxes.
    The only reason Im still playing it is because it's one of a kind. I hope they make a better game of the same style so that I can dump this trash in the toilet.
  25. codfaaan
    Jan 23, 2021
    2
    allora,ho giocato diverso ore a questo titolo e ora mi sento pronto a scriverne una recensione,il gioco ha troppi problemi,quindi da qualche parte devo cominciare e partirei dai contenuti che in questo gioco sono davvero scarni. il gioco offre le simulazioni che fanno da tutorial, sono noiosissime e basta, fanno cagare. passiamo al fulcro cioè il multiplayer, che offre un totale di 3allora,ho giocato diverso ore a questo titolo e ora mi sento pronto a scriverne una recensione,il gioco ha troppi problemi,quindi da qualche parte devo cominciare e partirei dai contenuti che in questo gioco sono davvero scarni. il gioco offre le simulazioni che fanno da tutorial, sono noiosissime e basta, fanno cagare. passiamo al fulcro cioè il multiplayer, che offre un totale di 3 modalità, bombe, contenitore e ostaggio. inoltre offre altre tre tipi di "sottocategorie" di partite che sono: libere, classificate , non classificate. le libere sono partite che si fanno per cazzeggiare e non contano. le classificate sono partite in cui gioco per salire di rango, invece le non classificate sono uguali alle classificate solo che non ti cambiano il rango.
    ah, è vero, quasi scordavo il più bello!
    nelle classificate e non classificate c'è solo una modalità cioè bombe.
    quindi già il gioco offre poche modalità e nella classificate (partite più giocate ed importanti) puoi giocarne solo una, cioè ma è uno scherzo?
    poi manca la campagna che è sempre stata il punto di forza dei vecchi capitoli della saga e qui è scomparsa a caso.
    poi a volte il gioco è piagato da glitch che lo rendono ingiocabile e dosser che interrompono le partite facendoti bloccare.
    e se a questo vogliamo aggiungere anche che la community è una delle più tossiche che abbia mai visto....
    poi vabbè il gioco sta peggiorando aggiungendo operatori sempre più inverosimili che rovinano sempre di più lo stile realistico che caratterizzava il gioco un esempio: hanno aggiunto un operatore che sfonda i muri correndoci contro, ma che cazzo mi dovrebbe rappresentare?
    il mio voto non può andare oltre il 2.
    se vi piace il gioco, o siete dei casual gamer di merda, o non avete mai provato un vero rainbow six    … Expand
  26. jac283
    Jan 26, 2016
    1
    decent potential but glitchy, broken, and incomplete. matchmaking is horrendous. the number of hackers is going up by the day. all game modes are basically the same
  27. Yoshimitsu84
    Dec 3, 2015
    1
    I'm not even sure where to begin honestly....

    People review this game and games in general because they care about it, they truly do if they invest time to talk about it. so whats positive? - Music (yes, I found it nice honestly) - the idea that you got different agents (tho absolutely not as I expect it to be, more details below) - the concept of defending is somewhat improved in    I'm not even sure where to begin honestly....

    People review this game and games in general because they care about it, they truly do if they invest time to talk about it.

    so whats positive?
    - Music (yes, I found it nice honestly)
    - the idea that you got different agents (tho absolutely not as I expect it to be, more details below)
    - the concept of defending is somewhat improved in a certain way compared to its predecessors

    whats bad?:
    boy oh boy where do I start?...

    - LAG (the game is unplayable, 1 shots without seeing bullets?), it's just unplayable most of the times
    - No customization of the agents (very basic in fact, just look at games like Rainbow six: Raven Shield or Rogue Spear and you'll understand what is missing here... it's just dull and extremely basic...
    - No modes (seriously, every mode they have, that I guess are somewhat 3, feel all the same... no all vs all, no possibility to choose the map and you are not even able to choose the mod u wanna play... that is just depressing).
    - Match Making lag/loop (if you cant find a match, the solution according to Ubi, is to quit the menu and enter again... Why do I need to be forced to find a workaround like that instead of implementing a proper Match making feature?...)
    - Wall glitches, body parts passing trough the walls, showing off your position in a tactical game is just plain retarded

    and the list goes on, I just cba anymore to list the negative stuff. As a customer who basically has/had all the Rainbow six games for PC I am speechless at how low Ubi fell down, I am deeply saddend and very disappointed.

    Shame on you guys, how can you even feel good about this?...    … Expand
  28. Atiwiex
    Jul 16, 2017
    1
    Don't buy this game, it is a waste of money. This game has a lot of potential but because it's a Ubisoft ip, it is terrible. They don't listen to the community what so ever, therefore no MAJOR problems with the game are every fixed. I'M NOT EXAGGERATING the hit registration is awful, the game will crash frequently (AND SOMETIMES WHEN IT CRASHES IT **** UNINSTALLS ITSELF), the game has aDon't buy this game, it is a waste of money. This game has a lot of potential but because it's a Ubisoft ip, it is terrible. They don't listen to the community what so ever, therefore no MAJOR problems with the game are every fixed. I'M NOT EXAGGERATING the hit registration is awful, the game will crash frequently (AND SOMETIMES WHEN IT CRASHES IT **** UNINSTALLS ITSELF), the game has a ton of bugs that Ubisoft just refuses to listen and fix!!!… Expand
  29. tanay97
    Oct 29, 2017
    1
    If you have skill, don't buy this game. If you are smart, don't buy this game. This game rewards luck and omly luck. If you have good aim, u will suck at this game. If you play tactically, u will lose. This is a game where luck is key. If you practice in this game, u will fail 100%. The best thing to do to win is run in without droning. It works for everyone else but me, but **** it. ThisIf you have skill, don't buy this game. If you are smart, don't buy this game. This game rewards luck and omly luck. If you have good aim, u will suck at this game. If you play tactically, u will lose. This is a game where luck is key. If you practice in this game, u will fail 100%. The best thing to do to win is run in without droning. It works for everyone else but me, but **** it. This game is so ****ing ****… Expand
  30. dasbo
    Nov 24, 2017
    1
    I regret a lot buying this game, stay away from it.
    Pay to win, lots of micro transactions and you basically have to pay to unlock anything (or grind for hours and hours for a single character or item), this game should be free to play by the level of micro transactions it contains.
prev
Page:

Awards & Rankings

18
#18 Most Discussed PS4 Game of 2015
18
#18 Most Shared PS4 Game of 2015

Critic Reviews

All reviews »
Metascore
73

Mixed or average reviews - based on 40 Critic Reviews

Critic score distribution:
  1. Positive: 23 out of 40
  2. Mixed: 16 out of 40
  3. Negative: 1 out of 40
  1. Edge Magazine
    Feb 16, 2016
    60
    Siege can feel cool and inhospitable, but when the conditions are right and you're playing with friends, the game's tense gameplay and measured pacing makes for a refreshing, cerebral contrast to the run-and-gun hyperactivity of most online shooters. [Feb 2016, p.104]
  2. Playstation Official Magazine UK
    Feb 10, 2016
    80
    Impossible to recommend as a single-player game. Siege is an absolutely splendid multiplayer shooter for well-organised (and forgiving) teams, with great tactical terrain destruction. [Feb 2016, p.86]
  3. Play UK
    Jan 16, 2016
    80
    A slight but superior multiplayer experience. What it lacks in single-player content, Rainbow Six Siege makes up in sheer quality. Just remember to use voice chat. [Issue#265, p.76]
See all critic reviews »